Krdbot not using nowiki in "content was"

Hi again. I addressed this issue of not using nowiki in "content was" at User talk:Krd/archive/2025#Template:VRTrestore, but it has recurred with Special:Diff/1089702356 and similar edits, populating Category:Malformed deletion requests (and in this case Category:Collections of Musée Cernuschi). Please fix your bot and what it has done, and then purge Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2025/07/24.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:22, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I have the feeling we change this back and forth. I have now made a comment in the code for the next occurence. Krd 18:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Deletion log entries are not interpreted as wikitext, but they are so interpreted when Krdbot puts them on pages, so they should be sanitized. What possible opposing viewpoint would there be?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:21, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Sadly I don't remember. We'll see if it arises again. Krd 07:59, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Indeed. Johnj1995 (who thankfully fixed the problem I noticed) may notice recurrence first, though. I was pleased to see a result of your change in special:diff/1090869201.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

DR post-close cleanup

Hi Krd. Now that Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Texas Historical Commission plaques in Fort Bend County, Texas, I'm wondering whether something about copyright status of each of the photographed plaques should be added to their respective file descriptions so that the files don't get mistakenly tagged/nominated for deletion again. For example, a {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} license seems fine for the photo of File:FBISD Historical Marker.jpg, but technically the uploader wouldn't be considered the copyright holder of the plaque, right? Should there be a different license provided for the plaque based on the VRT ticket or is the same license OK? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:30, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

It should have been done with a custom license template from the beginning because it's causing pain with every new upload. Please see Category:Custom license tags with ticket permission for examples and please prepare a draft. Krd 05:53, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look. FWIW, I didn't upload any of the files discussed in that DR; I only asked about one of them at VPC; I also wasn't involved in the email to VRT. If these files need would be better off with a custom license, then the uploaders or person who emailed VRT should probably be the ones to create it since they'd be privy to all the details. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:00, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Right, sorry. I'd love to clean that up, but no spare time at my side currently. Krd 11:08, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Löschung eines Logos für einen Artikel über eine Schule

Hallo, kannst du mir als unerfahrenem wiki-User erklären, warum das Logo für einen Schulartikel gelöscht worden ist und was ich tun kann/muss, um es wieder hochzuladen und einzubinden? Was bedeutet "No ticket permission since 30 June 2026" konkret? Dankeschön! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_der_Deutschen_Schule_Sofia.png Oct4vi4nus (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Siehe: COM:VRT Krd 06:17, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 11:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Interface-Änderung

zu https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Erzr%C3%B6ste,_Stadl-Predlitz.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=1257785597&diffmode=source

Kannst du das weiter machen, aber bitte die Q-Id statt der alten Objekt-ID als Parameter nehmen? Im konkreten Fall habe ich das bereits händisch gemacht, dein Bot hat dann gedoppelt.

{{Doo}} funktioniert mit beiden Parameterarten (erkennbar an: beginnt mit Q). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Das dauert leider ein paar Tage. Krd 05:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Wie sieht es jetzt aus? --Krd 11:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

in dem genannten Diff, der Baustein den Du hinzugefügt hast, darin ist ein Link "de" als: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_heritage_monuments_in_Stadl-Predlitz#Q38089766 Der führt auf keine Seite. Krd 09:35, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

File:15 at Everfree Northwest 2025.png and File:15 at Everfree Northwest 2025 (full).png

Hello. Both images had permission license sent through VRTS from the copyright holder, but why were they removed? Bronymike2010 (talk) 05:17, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Please provide the ticket number. --Krd 05:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

@Krd: I don't have the ticket number because I'm not the copyright holder. It was added to both files pages in July. Bronymike2010 (talk) 05:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Permission sender did not reply to followup questions. Please encourage them to do. Krd 05:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Email has been sent to them, could the images be un-deleted until they respond? Bronymike2010 (talk) 05:47, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

I should be sufficient to undelete after permission has been achieved. Krd 09:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Deleted image

Dear Krd, could you check File:Bauke Hüsken (2025) (1).jpg again? I thought the permission ticket was succesfully resolved. Kind regards, Perquirius (talk) 10:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Which ticket is that? Krd 10:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Ticket:2026070910010885. Kind regards, Perquirius (talk) 12:56, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Not resolved, permission sender got a reply at 13 July. --Krd 16:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 16:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)