User talk:Bonvol

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bonvol!

Kartenhinweis

Jetzt hab ich es korrigiert. Grüße Lencer (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Corvina veronese IGT Veneto 3689.jpg

File:Corvina veronese IGT Veneto 3689.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Oświecenia

Patrzyłem do Kroniki Miasta Poznania jak było podpisane i jest "os. Oświecenia, na którym pierwsze mieszkania oddano do użytku w 1973. Fragment ulicy Ostrowskiej. Budynki nr 65-69". Wszystko wskazuje na to, że zdjęcie było źle opisane. Spojrzałem na mapę i wydaje mi się, że jest to to samo ujęcie jak na zdjęciu współczesnym lub środkowej części tego zdjęcia. Balkony wyglądają na takie same. W 1973 na tym osiedlu wybudowano 7 bloków i są to właśnie te same które są na współczesnym ujęciu (tylko wieżowca i drzew nie było). Ulica Ostrowska kończyła się wtedy przed tymi blokami, a uliczka osiedlowa (dawna Ostrowska) prowadziła aż do obecnego przejścia podziemnego pod trasą katowicką. W momencie przejścia Ostrowskiej w Wioślarską było rozwidlenie i ostry zakręt - na zdjęciu widać nawet znak drogowy. Patrzyłem też na inne osiedla, ale wszędzie indziej bloki są prostopadle albo równolegle do uliczek - tutaj są pod innym kątem do ulicy, balkony tak na szybko porównywałem, ale są inaczej łączone - na zdjęciu w grupy 20-30, na innych osiedlach widziałem grupy po 10-20. Jeśli przyjąć, że w opisie jest tylko błąd w numerach, a rok i ulica się zgadza, to będą te bloki za szkołą (2-7, 8-13, 29-34). Jak będę w okolicy to spojrzę czy da się powtórzyć ujęcie - wg mnie fotograf stał tam gdzie obecnie jest wieżowiec na Powstań Narodowych 1-2 i mierzył w kierunku obecnego wieżowca na Oświecenia 28.

Oto widok współczesny. Obecnie wieżowiec przysłania bloki z tyłu. Pierwszy z prawej blok to 29-34, z neonem. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi na błędne numery. Pozdrawiam Jakubtr (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

kategorie

Jeszcze się nie orientuje dobrze jak co obsługiwać :-) dotyczy https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheGuru#Kategorie

czy po dodaniu mogę zmienic kategorię czy tylko przy dodawaniu? pozdrawiam robert

Kategorie

Witaj, nie wiem jak dodać tutaj nową kategorię. Chodzi mi o dwie kategorie: "Marketplaces in Poland" i "B.Braun" (koncern medyczny) Z góry dziękuję za pomoc. Pozdrawiam Bialo-zielony (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Kategorie

Wielkie dzięki za szczegółowe objaśnienia:) Pozdrowienia z Pyrlandii Bialo-zielony (talk) 18:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Wymiana zdjęcia

Witaj, mam jeszcze jedno pytanie techniczne. Załadowałem kiedyś tutaj zdjęcie, ale teraz udało mi się wykonać lepsze jakościowo tego samego obiektu z identycznego ujęcia. Czy istnieje możliwość wymiany fotki załadowanej na commons? Pozdrawiam Bialo-zielony (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Dawny browar, ul. Przykop, Grodzisk Wlkp..jpg

Witaj, chciałem załadować nowszą wersję tego pliku, ale nie jestem pewien czy zrobiłem wszystko dobrze. Jeśli możesz, popraw. Pozdrawiam Bialo-zielony (talk) 08:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Browar w Grodzisku

Witaj, dzięki za info. W Grodzisku pozostało wiele budynków po dawnych browarach. Nowy Browar powstał w budynkach przy ul. Poznańskiej, a zdjęcie przedstawia dawny browar przy ul. Przykop. Zapraszam do zapoznania się z artykułem na wiki o historii piwowarstwa w Grodzisku. Jeśli będziesz w Buku to informuję, że w klasztorze w Woźnikach można nabyć książkę o tym miejscu, której jestem współautorem, a właściwie jednym z dwóch redaktorów, ponieważ trzeci - ojciec Alojzy Pańczak chciał pozostać w cieniu.

Pozdrawiam Bialo-zielony (talk) 19:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Popielżyn

Hello, I saw you took a photo of Popielżyn. One of my relatives, Srul Goldberg (c. 1834-1875) lived in Popielżyn and was a miller. I think he may have been in charge of the old water mill. If you would be able to direct me to any resources it would be much appreciated Nashelskeryid (talk) 02:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

File:2023-03-26 Failed redir do Tribbs.png

File:2023-03-26 Failed redir do Tribbs.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

File tagging File:WNK 2024 Bonvol Myszyniec Kurpie comics 2.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:WNK 2024 Bonvol Myszyniec Kurpie comics 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:WNK 2024 Bonvol Myszyniec Kurpie comics 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 14:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File tagging File:WNK 2024 Bonvol Myszyniec Comics with Kurpie motives.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:WNK 2024 Bonvol Myszyniec Comics with Kurpie motives.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:WNK 2024 Bonvol Myszyniec Comics with Kurpie motives.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 14:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.

The files above are derivative works, and we need a formal written permission, at least from the artist. Thanks, --Yann (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)