Reverting an image replacement for the Geometry Dash logo

I noticed that you removed the application logo from Wikimedia Commons for copyright reasons. I was considering replacing the current text logo in the article's infobox with the app icon, as it is more widely recognized.

Before I proceed, I wanted to get your thoughts on re-uploading the icon (perhaps under a Fair Use rationale if it doesn't meet the threshold of originality). Alternatively, do you think it would be better to combine both logos into a single image, however the Infobox video game template only supports one primary image field so we would need to find a solution. Midpour (talk) 03:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

@Midpour Hi, and sorry for the delay. Any chance you have a link to/the exact name of the deleted image? Or if it was removed from an article, a link to that article? I don't remember deleting that, or why I did so. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, sorry for the late response. Here is the link to the image that I wanted to replace with the current logo on the article, or include both images if possible: File:Geometry Dash application icon.svg

It says that you removed it for copyright even though both images have the same license I believe.

Here is the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometry_Dash Midpour (talk) 16:32, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

@Midpour I think you can't reupload this on Commons because we don't allow fair use. If it meets the English Wikipedia's w:en:WP:NFCC, then it could be uploaded as nonfree there, but I suspect it doesn't meet criterion 1 (see also w:en:Wikipedia:Non-free content#Meeting the no free equivalent criterion). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Polygon blockchain logo.png

File:Polygon blockchain logo.png has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Polygon blockchain logo.png This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dieseldeee (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You may be an eligible candidate for the U4C election

"Reason" parameter

Hi. A reason has been provided here, but it says "no reason". This is incorrect. At the same time, there are exceptional cases where the message should not be sent, for example if the user is a vandal or an LTA. Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 03:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Noted, hopefully I can rewrite the code in the next week or two. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Let me also leave a note here: this notification does not show the actual primary reason selected, it only shows the additional reason. That also creates confusion. Check this edits: 1, 2 and 3, 4. Especially look at the second action — there I write "and" as an additional reason, but it is missing. Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Question

Can I ask, I wanted to post images from this site (https://www.president.gov.ua/en/photos/zustrich-prezidenta-ukrayini-z-prezidentom-gvineyi-bisau-v-k-4997), but I noticed I couldn't because they were somehow deleted. What was wrong? And many people uploaded similar images from this source (president.gov.ua) and they weren't deleted. The Sergei (talk) 07:09, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

@The Sergei That site now licenses under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, which is not allowed on Commons. So new uploads aren't allowed. (But since the old license is irrevocable, old images from before the license change are still allowed.) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Deletion Notification Bot 2's notifications shouldn't be marked as minor edits

Hi Mdaniels5757, a few days ago your bot left me a talk page message, but because the edit was marked as minor, I didn't get an email notification, so I wasn't aware of the message until long after the file was deleted. Normally it's appropriate for bot edits to be marked as minor, but notifications like these shouldn't be. A new talk page message isn't a minor edit, and marking these notifications as minor partially defeats the purpose of placing them, because for many editors minor edits will be filtered out of their notifications or watchlists. —Mx. Granger (talk  · contribs) 04:42, 16 May 2026 (UTC)