Wikimore

2 June 2026

4 June 2026

Deletion requests on 3 June 2026

June 3

File:大溪普濟堂歷史論證.pdf

Out of scope: plain text. Commons is not an academic journal; this is not an appropriate place to voice historical disputes. Omphalographer (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep — The file is a freely licensed educational document related to the early history of Daxi Puji Temple. It is not uploaded merely as an opinion essay, but contains historical photographs, document images, source references, and source-index information that may help editors identify and evaluate relevant materials for the article.

Therefore, Please KEEP, and NEVER delete Please, Please.

YaoJermyn (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Shibuya Parco in 2023

per COM:DW. The nominated photos are taken at こまねこ公開撮影展 (lit. Komaneko filming exhibition) held at Shibuya PARCO in 2023. The subjects are materials for filming stop motion animation series こまねこ and ja:どーもくん, all of which are copyrighted works of a team headed by 合田経郎 (GŌDA Tsuneo, 1967-). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Komaneko Making Exhibition (53146571867).jpg.

Mzaki (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:LL-Q33578 (ibo)-Chigozirim2005-Abeokuta.wav

Bad recording Chigozirim2005 (talk) 02:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by FotoSV (talk · contribs)

1 found at https://x.com/CeciliaGRM/status/2061634961594073219 the others also sus

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 02:38, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:黑字私纂本神魂執照.png

Out of scope: this image was generated or modified using AI. If this image is of a real work of art, please upload an unmodified version. Omphalographer (talk) 03:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

我上傳的黑字私纂本神魂執照.png，我只用了AI輔助修圖及美化，使全圖文字，背景及線條顔色保持一致！而大部分我是用繪圖軟件製作詩句文字修改版的！道統王陽明 (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

若真有此需要，我可改用未經AI輔助修圖及美化的版本！道統王陽明 (talk) 02:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

本圖片非藝術作品，我的圖片非以 real work of art為目的，是以學術研究為主！圖片所顯示的「黑色偽篡本」特徵（如「魑魅魍魎」的錯植，隨意拼湊、私意重編、杜撰詩句、破壞傳統）無法在其他公版文物中體現，為我的研究及之後引用在文庫上提供了不可或缺的原始資料。道統王陽明 (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

我所知AI暫時未有能修正這類年代十分遠，錯字又多，文理又複雜的民俗宗教用品能力，因必須手頭上有足夠資料才能做到，但偏偏有关神魂執照的文字資料及網上資料十分稀少，我只好做田野實地調查，親身訪問一些行業老前輩及民間老道士採集資料，拯救快消失之文化，再配合家傳古本，筆記！全為第一手資料，全為第一手研究成果！道統王陽明 (talk) 03:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

已上傳改用未經AI輔助修圖及美化的版本道統王陽明 (talk) 04:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

已上傳改用未經AI輔助修圖美化的版本道統王陽明

The new version of this image you've uploaded has clearly been edited as well. Omphalographer (talk) 02:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

我是用繪圖軟件製作詩句文字修改版的！I used drawing software to create the modified version of the poem! 道統王陽明 (talk) 05:12, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

一些行業老前輩，說曾出現過一份手寫修正版！我依其記憶口述之詩句還原之在此黑字私纂本神魂執照執照上，這些手寫修正版執照每次做完法事就會用火燒去，不會留下來的：道統王陽明 (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

手動人工校勘修訂圖（依據一手田野資料）道統王陽明 (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

這涉及不是删去一張圖那麼草率，這是一系列有關神魂執照版本變化之深入研究之一！道統王陽明 (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

一）版本目錄學價值：補全道經民間流變鏈路 1. **建立完整版本演化譜系**：以存檔黑字私纂祖本作標準對照底本，橫向比對各地數種衍生傳抄本，可清晰還原「官刻正統本→初代黑字私改母本→各地二次異改衍生本」三級傳播脈絡，量化文獻從道觀走入民間後，用字、符文、偈文逐代訛變、增改的規律，填補正統道藏只收官修文本、缺失民間流傳環節的空白。 2. **區分刻意篡改與無心傳抄錯訛**：黑字本原始錯字是人為改造所致，後世衍生抄本分為兩類：一類沿襲黑字固有錯處、一類在地再度自行改易，二者用字差異可作為民間文獻鑒定範例，完善近代民間坊本、手抄本的辨偽體系。道統王陽明 (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

請明白這些原版是明清時期的紙寶，是用來祭拜的，纸質差，印刷馬虎，如果真的留下來，也是古董了，而且也是殘破不堪之古董！道統王陽明 (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

讀者需要這張圖才能明白後期流傳版本之變化歷程，之後大部分流傳版本之子版本也由此而來！道統王陽明 (talk) 06:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

手動校勘定稿檔：依托家傳古本與田野一手採訪資料，使用繪圖軟體人工逐字校正錯訛（修正訛變詩句），全程無任何AI生成、AI修圖美化；校勘稿僅作學術參考文本，用於對比各類衍生本、還原本來文辭，不覆蓋、不替換原始祖本檔。既恪守歷史文獻真實性，又滿足版本考據的研究需求。道統王陽明 ([[User talk:道統王陽明|

Files uploaded by Danielmodestos1 (talk · contribs)

Mostly book covers and derivative work of book covers. Please contact COM:VRT through permissions-commonswikimedia.org, thank you.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment images below should be kept per De minimis:

File:MANHÃ DE AUTOGRAFOS 2.jpg

File:MANHÃ DE AUTÓGRAFOS.jpg SomeFancyUsername (talk) 10:46, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

SomeFancyUsername, the file page says "The files were uploaded with permission from the author and rights holder, Izabel Cristina da Silva. I am in contact with the author and can provide authorization through the VRT process if necessary." - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:52, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Book cover related deletion requests/pending

Files uploaded by Pavlo79 (talk · contribs)

Not own work. Maybe public domain?

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment person what depicted on this photos died in 1944, also Poland, Ukraine and Russia (сountries in whose territories he lived) had 50 p.m.a on the URAA date. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Lyre Player and Bird Fresco from Pylos Throne Room.jpg

Copyright violation. This image is taken from The Pylos of Nestor at Pylos I, under copyright to the Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, and requires permission of the Greek Ministry of Culture to reproduce. The uploader is not authorized to issue a CC license and is not the creator of the image. Carlwblegen (talk) 04:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep A technical reproduction of a clearly public domain work cannot be seen as artistic work and be eligible to copyright SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Pochód młodzieży 22 lipca 1952.jpg

Ponieważ w całości prawa autorskie i majątkowe należą do Forum Polskie Agenji Fotografów. ~2026-32936-82 (talk) 04:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

For convenience, Google translates this request as Because all copyright and property rights belong to the Forum Polskie Agenji Fotografów.

Question {{PD-Polish}} says "... all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed to be in the public domain in Poland." Therefore, I suppose whether this applies here depends upon whether it was published with a copyright notice in the original publication ("scanned from Bohdan Garliński: Architektura Polska 1950-1951, PWT, Warszawa 1953"). We can't ask the uploader, as, sadly, user Szczebrzeszynski has passed away. If we can't say for sure that it was published without a copyright notice, I would lean towards deletion per COM:PCP. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

This photograph appears — with no copyright reservation on the photographic work itself — in Bohdan Garliński, Architektura polska 1950–1951 (PWT, Warszawa 1953), digitized here: https://delibra.bg.polsl.pl/dlibra/publication/32641/edition/28918?language=en

The only notices in that book are a general "Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone" ("All rights reserved") on the editorial page, and an index of photographers that lists "Sławny W." against the relevant plate numbers. Neither is placed on the photograph itself.

This matters under the Polish Copyright Act of 10 July 1952 (art. 2 §1), which was in force when the photo was taken and published. Under that Act a photograph was protected by copyright only if an explicit copyright reservation was made on the work itself. Polish case law is clear that a general reservation printed on a publication's editorial pages does not meet this requirement — the reservation had to appear on at least one copy of the photograph (a print, negative or slide); see the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznań of 30 June 1992 (I ACr 220/92). A photographer's surname in an index is attribution, not a reservation of economic rights.

Because no reservation appears on the work, the photograph most likely never became subject to copyright at all. This is decisive for the "revival" rule: art. 124(1)(3) of the 1994 Act revived only economic rights that had once existed and then lapsed — not works that were never protected in the first place (Supreme Court, 6 June 2002, I CKN 654/00). So this is not a case of copyright that expired; the photograph was outside copyright from the start and remains in the public domain. This supports the PD-Polish tag. (The only caveat is that none of us can inspect the original print/negative, which is the sole place an on-work reservation could theoretically exist.)

As for the FORUM agency listing, it does not establish copyright:

FORUM cannot hold the moral rights (Polish autorskie prawa osobiste). Under art. 78 of the 1994 Act these are perpetual, inalienable and strictly personal: they belong to Władysław Sławny and, after his death (1991), may be exercised only by the persons named in the statute (spouse, descendants, etc.) — they can never be assigned to an agency.
Ownership of the original photograph is not copyright either. Art. 52 of the Act expressly separates ownership of a physical copy from authors' rights. Owning the negative or print lets FORUM control access to its own object and charge for its own scan under a contract, but it gives no right to control reproductions made from other, public-domain sources — such as the scan from this 1953 book.

So the most plausible reading is the one you suggest: FORUM is the owner/custodian of an original print or negative and licenses access to its high-resolution copy — a contractual/service matter — rather than a holder of subsisting copyright in the image. A commercial listing, a watermark and a price are not evidence that a work is protected; faithful reproductions of public-domain works do not attract fresh protection (cf. art. 14 of the EU DSM Directive 2019/790, implemented in Poland in 2024). Mturajski (talk) 20:26, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Glico Man (Dotonbori, 2014)

"Glico man" is originally a work of 江崎利一 (EZAKI Riichi, 1882-1980) first published in 1921 with several revisions after that. The copyright continues at least till 2050. Files with the "Glico man" ad have been repeatedly discussed for deletion, and we can keep them only when COM:de minimis is applicable. The nominated files feature the "Glico man" ad as the central subject, so de minimis is not applicable. Note that some other files in the category are also questionable in terms of de minimis; files not nominated here should not be considered to be kept.

Mzaki (talk) 04:34, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:LL-Q33578 (ibo)-Geraldine Kene-Izombe.wav

The name already has a pronunciation Geraldine Kene (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:2022 Lunar New Year for All 1.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) JaydenChao (talk) 05:42, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! This picture was taken by a member of Lunar New Year for All and was provided to us and is owned by us. Tinygaybunny (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Stephen Sarsalari (talk · contribs)

Not sure if this is really public domain. Metadata states that copyright is to "Channel 5", which produced the series Big Brother from 2011 to 2018. The Flickr account's name, "BigBrother Junkie", suggests that it is a fan account and not the actually copyright holder (Channel 5), as they post screencaps of the series. The image also shows up on articles that predate the upload date of January 14, 2018, like the Irish Mirror on October 2, 2017 (credited as being from WENN.com).

reppop^talk 05:46, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom – Howardcorn33 (💬) 19:10, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

File:Studio 54 1978.jpg

The source of this publication makes the copyright highly suspect. While I can't identifiy the exact issue this comes from, two issues of New York Magazine from around this time the photo was taken clearly show proper copyright notices (). It is unclear why the defective notice template is being applied here. Based5290 (talk) 07:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

The defective notice rationale is based on the specific publication of the photograph, not on whether New York Magazine generally used copyright notices. The cited issues show that copyright notices were often present, but they do not establish that this particular image was published with a valid notice. Unless evidence is provided for the specific issue and page where the photograph appeared, the defective notice rationale remains applicable. Twixister (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

The burden is on the uploader to prove the copyright status is valid. You have not stated what notice exactly is considered to be defective. Keep in mind that a single copyright notice for the magazine as a whole covers most contributions to said magazine (see https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/404: However, a single notice applicable to the collective work as a whole is sufficient to invoke the provisions of section 401(d) or 402(d), as applicable with respect to the separate contributions it contains (not including advertisements inserted on behalf of persons other than the owner of copyright in the collective work), regardless of the ownership of copyright in the contributions and whether or not they have been previously published.). Based5290 (talk) 07:06, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete This photograph has been identified as Christopher Makos's The Gang of Four at Studio 54 (Liza Minnelli, Andy Warhol, Bianca Jagger, and Halston), 1978. An Art Gallery of Ontario exhibition catalog identifies Makos's related work In Context: Gang of Four, 1978 as part of the Makos Archive, and a Heritage auction record attributes this composition to Makos: source. No defective notice or failure to register the copyright within five years has been demonstrated, so {{PD-US-defective notice-1978-89}} is unsupported. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

The black-and-white photograph in the link provided is not the same image as the color photograph under discussion. It was common for multiple photographers to cover Studio 54 events and photograph the same subjects. Therefore, the existence of Makos's The Gang of Four at Studio 54 does not, by itself, establish that this separate color photograph was taken by him. Without a reliable source specifically attributing the color image to Makos, its authorship remains unconfirmed. Twixister (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete as lacking enough source information to determine the copyright status. The only source given is "New York Magazine", with no issue number specified. If it was published in an issue of NYM, then as the nominator points out, that issue almost certainly included a valid copyright notice. But more importantly, if we don't know when or how the image was published, then we have no evidence that it is in the public domain. hinnk (talk) 23:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Steadicam Operator John Fry with Master Steadicam & Arri Alexa camera.jpg

May also have to be deleted:

The description author=Steadicam indicates that the images was just taken from the web and is not taken by the uploader. The image also appears on other websites like here with the attribution "Steadicam" or places like here with no attribution. Considering the account setup and the published files I don't think that the uplaoder is the real author or the file was ever published under a free licence elsewhere.
@Fryfilm2000~commonswiki: Can you tell us more about the image and/or it's origin?
--D-Kuru (talk) 08:27, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

I am the original uploader and author. The pictures were taken on set by my assistant then Photoshopped in the white background. If you need more information pictured is a Master Elite Steadicam belonging at the time to Dave Crute of Rock Steadi Pictures in Wimborne, the Arri Alexa camera was hired for the job in London, and the Panasonic HPX500 with Canon J9 lens was one or three we owned at the time with our outside broadcast unit. See the website for more photos of me then and now. https://johnfrysteadicam.co.uk/

I'm sorry if at the time I didn't know all the correct information to add to the picture. Fryfilm2000 (talk) 08:49, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

@Fryfilm2000: Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately it took me a bit longer to respond.

1) "I am the original uploader and author" and "The pictures were taken on set by my assistant" don't work together. Either you or you assistant has taken the image (edge cases aside when to people press the shutter button). If your assistant has taken the images, you are therefore not the author (and usually are not allowed to licence the image under a free licence). In some contracts the employer reserves the right to relicence the images. I have no idea what the contract of your assistant says.

2) Why would you use "Steadicam" (so the brand name owned by The Tiffen Company long before the image was taken) and not you real or the author name? Steadicam somewhat implies that the image was taken for somewhere related to The Tiffen Company.

Don't get me wrong: If everything is fine regarding authorship and licencing I'm more than happy to keep the images. Uploading a file tagged with "Own work" that was in reality taken from some website ist just the claim used the most (by far). So forgive me if I'm not easily trusting a claim like that after almost 20 years on this project.

--D-Kuru (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

1) The assistant was employed by me to take promo images for me with my camera. Check the metadata.

Here's the original image.

2) Because I'd never uploaded anything to Wikimedia before and didn't really know what I was doing. And for your information, the name Steadicam is owned by Garret Brown, who only licensed the name to The Tiffen Company in 2000. The rig I am flying is a Master Elite, produced by the previous license, Cinema Products. If I got confused between what two put in what box, author, license or brand then that's my mistake, but not incorrect on two of those three counts and certainly not justification for deletion!

There's no trust necessary. I've been a professional Steadicam operator for well over 20 years which a simple Google would have shown you, but instead you mark my image for deletion and apparently would rather have this argument than just look up my credentials yourself in two minutes flat. I will be cancelling my future donations to Wikipedia. Fryfilm2000 (talk) 20:47, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Thumbnail 7deab7bb-7dc7-4c16-a78b-e5230a769399 (1).jpg

Copyright issue: filename suggest that this file was downloaded from some website and not own work Evelino Ucelo (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Samra Artan .png

Copyright issue: screenshot of Snapchat; depicted person likely isn't notable Evelino Ucelo (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Roma4.jpg

Copyright issue: dubious "own work" claim, looks like scan of old photo Evelino Ucelo (talk) 09:38, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Oksana Zhezhel1.jpg

Copyright issue: looks like scan of old photo, so isn't own work Evelino Ucelo (talk) 09:55, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Eingang Industrieclub Elberfelder Straße 6.jpg

Wir möchten an dieser Stelle ein neues Bild hochladen. Gedankengut (talk) 10:08, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Dann macht doch gerne ein neues Bild der Eingangstür. Keine*r hindert Euch daran ein neues Bild hochzuladen. Dazu muss man dieses Bild von 2017 nicht löschen. Der Löschantrag ist Grundlos ;) Jula2812 (talk) 11:50, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Richtig! -- Kürschner (talk) 15:34, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Benten12 (talk · contribs)

Per: Commons:Nudity#New_uploads

Smooth O (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Deleting these files serves no constructive purpose. They have clear educational, journalistic, and artistic value as documentation of human anatomy (particularly foreskin variation and dynamic processes like urination and erection in slow motion, which remain underrepresented). People who do not wish to see such content are not forced to view it — Commons is a vast repository and users can simply avoid the relevant categories. Dislike or the subjective argument that there are "too many" human body images is not a valid deletion rationale under COM:SCOPE or Commons:Nudity. There is no policy limiting the number of educational human pictures, just as we do not delete other well-documented subjects for being "too numerous". The blanket nomination without individual rationales further weakens this request. ANTICOMMUNISTT (talk) 04:13, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep - (yet) another would be purge. most of these seem to be decently high quality images. this "laundry list" of deletions is pretty much a deliberate kick-in-the-ass to a new commons user, who has done NOTHING WRONG, to deserve such treatment.

i have checked EACH item on the above list nominated for deletion now. some of the pictures are better than others. some of the pictures are GOOD. & the penis type shown is slightly unusual, esp the foreskin. but the fact that the nominating user made NO effort to categorise ANY OF THEM, & just created a "dump list" of everything uploaded by this user, speaks volumes as to their intent.

Lx 121 (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

- as a matter of fact: the VIDEOS included in the deletion list are much less well represented in the existing catalogue of wmc material. AND the videos appear to be of adequate quality for educational use, & at least some of them are actually slow motion. which we do not have many other examples of on wmc, as far as i know?

checked each video.

the penis type shown is physically distinct from most of the other videos presently in the relevant categories.

-the urination videos are in moderate slow motion. with good illustration of foreskin movements. we DO NOT have much video of that.

-the erection-process video is accelerated-time, competently done, & shows the transition nicely in a short clip. so USEFUL for a sex ed context. also with foreskin, which we do not have as well represented in such videos.

Lx 121 (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete we really don’t need any new pictures of cocks, okay? Dronebogus (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

question: before you commented, did you either: a) read the points i listed above, &/or b) actually GO & LOOK AT EACH FILE (in their relevant categories, comparing with existing material) before deciding to keep/delete each of them? "i don't like it" is not a valid deletion rationale. (& for that matter if we are quantity-limiting categories, there are LOTS of other files, in lots of MORE-POPULATED categories, here @ wmc that should be deleted because "we really don't need any new pictures" of them. or is it just sex that bothers you?) Lx 121 (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep COM:Nudity states: New low-resolution or poor-quality files that provide little descriptive information about a subject for which we already have files may be nominated for deletion citing appropriate rationale(s). No rationales where cited, so this is an invalid DR. Additionally, it's obvious that at least the videos have some uniqueness and are of decent quality. The images can be discussed, but not as a whole. --PaterMcFly (talk) 15:15, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete Commons has enough media of higher quality then this. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 19:20, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

comment - "Commons has enough media of higher quality then this." - this is not a valid rationale. by those standards we could easily delete HALF of the files @ wmc. are you suggesting that we should do so? Lx 121 (talk)

Speedy keep as these images and videos should be considered educational. If it were up to me, we'd have a racially and physically diverse collection of the human anatomy here. We have hundreds of photos of buildings and animals. None of these are low quality in my opinion. Maybe they could do with a bit more specific titles. I would also like to second all of what was said by Lx 121.Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Speedy delete What is still missing in this obscene theme? Юрий Д.К. 17:47, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
please clarify? Lx 121 (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
I believe that we have already a lot of photos of such specific theme. Юрий Д.К. 19:00, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Speedy delete COM:CSDF10. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
please explain how exactly is it that you feel COM:CSD - "F10. Personal files by non-contributors

Low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal files (including AI-generated images) of or by users who have no constructive global contributions.[2]" - applies to EVERY FILE in this DR list? because, i really do not see how that criteria fits here... o__0 ? Lx 121 (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Interesting and varied contributions that offer unique content. Mort121 (talk) 23:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

File:Антон Загорій у Празі.jpg

ніде не використовується Антон Загорій (talk) 10:16, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Blason famille fr d'Araquy.svg

fichier de très mauvaise qualité. Corentin Tauran 46 (talk) 10:40, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Coat of arms-related deletion requests/pending

File:Clube Militar Lagoa.jpg

Copyright issue: low resolution, so likely not own work, but crop of screenshot or something similar Evelino Ucelo (talk) 10:45, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Чжон Кихон.jpg

Definitely not made by the uploader. Разгребатель (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Alexandr Shevchenko no watermark.jpg

Not needed anymore. Heaven is heaven btw (talk) 11:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kecamatan Mandau, Bengkalis, Riau.jpg

COM:FOP Indonesia SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Tech. Sgt. Crystal Maldonado, 92nd Security Forces Squadron military working dog handler, and her dog, Leo, return from UH-1N Huey training Oct. 25, 2022, at Fairchild Air Force Base, Wash.jpg

Duplicate of Tech. Sgt. Crystal Maldonado and her dog Leo.jpg 2pattywhack27 (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, lower quality duplicate of File:Tech. Sgt. Crystal Maldonado and her dog Leo.jpg. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:POL powiat mrągowski COA.svg

To niestety nie jest herb Powiatu Mrągowskiego. Właściwy znajduje się na stronie internetowej www.powiat.mragowo.pl 89.231.29.191 09:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

File:POL powiat mrągowski COA.svg

Prezentowany herb jest nieprawidłowy. Proszę o usunięcie błędnego herbu lub zamianę na prawidłowy dostępny w linku: https://samorzad.gov.pl/web/powiat-mragowo/honorowy-patronat-starosty-mragowskiego Pm2026 (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Coat of arms-related deletion requests/pending

Files in Category:Entrance sign (Legoland Billund)

Nuking the entire category as an infringement of the copyright held by the designer of the arch, presumably someone who worked at w:en:Legoland Billund Resort. The Danish Freedom of Panorama only grants exploitation rights to images of buildings, not other works of art. This entrance sign isn't a building in the first place. Note that I excluded File:Legoland Indgangen.jpg because it is released by the resort itself under the commercial CC license, and we can safely assume the designer has transferred their copyright to the resort.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 12:51, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Seal of Municipality of Ma-ayon.png

DuDuplicate Bud Poning27 (talk) 13:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Meves Gama.jpeg.webp

Copyright issue: looks like scan of old photo, so isn't own work Evelino Ucelo (talk) 13:44, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Lawnbrookclub.jpg

Obviously a screengrab from a video or something equally dubious. Editor has a history of questionable uploads, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brookmountstreet.jpg and also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gerald Donaghey gravestone.jpg (can hardly be disputed that Billsmith60~commonswiki and Billsmith60 are the same person) which was specifically about a screengrab from a video being passed off as own work. FDW777 (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Cutlass ^Ciera 22:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

File:60-jarig Herdenking op 4 mei 2005 van de bevrijding Tweede Wereldoorlog, op Kerkhof Nijenstede.jpg

er staat tekst in de afbeelding, dat bij het uploaden niet gezien werd Agaath (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Grafstenen van de omgekomen geallieerde vliegers L.R. Watts en D.P. Drummond.jpg

er staat tekst in de afbeelding die bij het uploaden niet gezien werd Agaath (talk) 14:48, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Grafstenen van de omgekomen geallieerde vliegers op het Kerkhof Nijenstede.jpg

er staat test in de afbeelding die bij het uploaden niet gezien werd Agaath (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:NGC 0730 DSS.jpg

DSS is copyrightː https://gsss.stsci.edu/Acknowledgements/DSSCopyrights.htm Lithopsian (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

~~: Delete per nomination. C messier (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)~~

Keep This is actually from the SDSS (SDSS9 in particular), which is available with a compatible license and the uploader missidentified in the title as a DSS image. --C messier (talk) 16:16, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

File:LOGO DESA MODISI.png

Duplikat Bili9875615 (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:NantesLOGO.png

Delete The source is a secondary source. The actual source is the club itself. The image is not shown at the source indicated or the club site to be available under the here stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Image appears to be above threshold of originality, and isn't simple text. Hammersoft (talk) 15:34, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Logo related deletion requests/pending

File:Logo Master Point.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Logo related deletion requests/pending

File:Hasior.jpg

Copyright, not own work Wmbata (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Has Canoscan EXIF. But yeah, please contact COM:VRT through permissions-commonswikimedia.org, thank you. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Grand Théatre Rabat.jpg

The main subject of this photograph is the Hadid Grand Theatre of Rabat by en:Zaha Hadid (died in 2016) - there is no freedom of panorama in Morocco Msb (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Hadid Grand Theatre de Rabat 2026.jpg

The main subject of this photograph is the Hadid Grand Theatre of Rabat by en:Zaha Hadid (died in 2016) - there is no freedom of panorama in Morocco Msb (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Volker Marquardt 1997.jpg

possible copyvio (Autogrammkarte) - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Ich bin der alleinige Eigentümer des Urheberrechts. Einmaleinsmachtzehn (talk) 17:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Einmaleinsmachtzehn, gerne kontaktieren COM:VRT nutzen permissions-commonswikimedia.org, danke. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:53, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Indonesia 6 - 07 Fatamorgana ft. Ferina & Lita.ogg

Not clear why this recording (and underlying composition) are in the public domain in both Indonesia and the United States. COM:URAA may apply here. Qzekrom (talk) 18:21, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

As mentioned in the notes in the summery, the copyright in Indonesia were lenient at the time the song is made before Indonesia rejoined the Berne Convention in 1997, but I don't know why it's in the public domain in the first place, let alone for phonographic works. Even so, did the record the band signed on really weave this song? The note doesn't have citations, so I also don't know where did the uploader got the info.

This may be in the public domain in the US with the template {{PD-1996}} if the song was in the public domain (or otherwise) in Indonesia The noun wit no name (talk) 05:06, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Additionally, I don't know if the song is retroactively copyrighted or, if indeed, renewed under the subsequent copyright laws of 2002, and 2014, both of which I haven't read fully. The noun wit no name (talk) 06:43, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

File:7 kX203hkwCvH3NKuB7UnA-5wvWhN296nijcQdC2IX-uUuYIi1zSu-fI1x0jFvJ48zm8AoyAXgaQxg7Hvfwn1T9V.jpg

No eidence ity is "own work" from 30 years ago Altenmann (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, obvious copyvio. Quick1984 (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

File:AyTürk Gölgelerin istilası.jpg

yanlış hesapta açıldı o yüzden Ayturkcizgiroman (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

@Ayturkcizgiroman: Which accounts do you have, and why? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:24, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Logo related deletion requests/pending

File:32114122 NissyNiharika ControlSystems.pdf

Personal resumé, out-of-scope, Commons is not your personal hosting service! Btrs (talk) 18:41, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ouroboros.snake.jpg

Unlikely own work claim. Maybe public domain. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:59, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Logo related deletion requests/pending

File:Shawki saeed.jpg

https://sahaafa.net/show7682368.html seemingly dated 2021, upload here 2022 - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:15, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Smurfit Kappa (logo).svg

Ce fichier est un logo d'entreprise privée, il n'est pas libre de droit, l'usage habituel voulant que les logos soient ajoutés sur chaque projet suivant les règles de "fair use" habituelles, et non sur Commons. Laudgutt (talk) 19:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Logo related deletion requests/pending

File:Logo-groupe-atlantic.jpg

Ce fichier est un logo d'entreprise privée, il n'est pas libre de droit, l'usage habituel voulant que les logos soient ajoutés sur chaque projet suivant les règles de "fair use" habituelles, et non sur Commons. C'était mon premier ajout sur Commons et j'ai naivement pensé qu'il pouvait être considéré comme libre de droit car mis à disposition de la presse. Laudgutt (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep I think it is below COM:TOO France. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:59, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Category:Logo related deletion requests/pending

Files uploaded by Ana Ngola Forgotten Souls (talk · contribs)

Per this deletion request, it appears unlikely these are confirmed to be "own work".

– Howardcorn33 (💬) 19:29, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Hawkarjahmed (talk · contribs)

Images from Facebook. Claimed to be "too old" and mistagged as CC0. Also derivative works, combining older and newer photos and graphics. Maybe some public domain, but who knows

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:47, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

those photos are too old because the persons i am sharing their article are dead, so i cant find a new photo of them, and these photos are the latest one we have its like the nations archieve, the Poet Bangina has died from 1972 how could i get his photos, we have them in his poets book but all thoese photos has also been published in social medias specially in facebook. someone removed the photo of Bangina Statue , i was taking the picture by my phone, but because it was published before on facebook and facebook has no copy right and doesnot refer to whom taken it doesnt mention that i am the owner. it is the same thing to the second Article about Dilshad Tofiq Bangina hes is kurdish Veteran martyr, he died in 1981, we just have some pictures that were also shared to social media and 1 website i mentioned it, Wikimedia should allow me to upload these photos because these are our history of our beloved one. Hawkarjahmed (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment ~~You can upload it to local (if your local accept fair use) and Delete because Commons doesn't allowed fair use.~~ JaydenChao (talk) 07:01, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment Wait... see COM:Iran, photograph in Iran only protect Publish + 30 years. JaydenChao (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

File:B.D. JAYARAM.jpg

Dubious own work claim - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:49, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Alexander Zerkowitz (talk · contribs)

Dubious own work claims. Uploader: please fix the author/source/date fields to avoid deletion. Courtesy ping RAN

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:57, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep I will fix them, they all appear to be {{PD-anon-70-EU}} --RAN (talk) 21:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment Probably no copyright issues, but several of the photographs are obviously AI-"enhanced" and should be deleted per COM:AIIP. I don't know whether that should be handled here or on a separate DR after this one is resolved. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

All coloured pictures are private picture and there ar no copyrigt issues to consider Alexander Zerkowitz (talk) 08:47, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Willi Baumeister ARU 5b.jpg

Willi Baumeister died in 1955, so this work is in the public domain in Germany now. However, it is from 1955, so (because of the URAA) it is still protected by copyright in the United States, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2051. Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Thomas Gangale.jpg

This is Thomas Gangale, uploaded by Tgangale13, but it doesn't look like a selfie. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:37, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:צילום מסך 2026-06-03 234158.png

Very low quality, could be a screenshot of a video. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Flag related deletion requests/pending

File:Derry Girls Mural - geograph.org.uk - 7105686.jpg

No COM:FOP UK for 2d works like COM:MURALS. Consigned (talk) 21:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:A-higher-calling-documentary-series.jpg

Part of an enwiki hoax, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A_Higher_Calling PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

User:Ktkvtsh/study

User request delete user sub page. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Amir Mohsen Xan (talk · contribs)

Initially tagged by Jeff G. as CSD F10 - personal photos of or by non-contributors

Phillipedison1891 (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment Uploader has a few constructive contributions and the files don't appear to be purely personal. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 23:11, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

I think the uploader was using most of them to decorate an article or other page on Persian Wikipedia. I can't find it now. Perhaps a Persian Wikipedia Admin or Steward can see their deleted contributions there. For me, examination of the uploader's contributions started with vandalistic edit Special:Diff/1224908472, which seemed to be promoting something about the Karder Nour family from the Naij tribe as one of the real ruling families of Nour. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

به من اهانت نکن. این عکس باید در صفحه قرار بگیرد زیرا عکس واقعی است . Amir Mohsen Xan (talk) 22:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Amir Mohsen Xan: You took these photos personally? Or are they photos of photos, and if so from where? Some appear to be duplicates. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

These photographs are authentic images of the Carder Nouri Naij family, which was the legitimate ruling family of Nur and Naij. The fact that some foreigners may be unfamiliar with this family does not mean that it was not real. Both historical records and the people of the region, along with their ancestors, have always remembered and recognized these individuals and their family.

It is important to understand that your responsibility is not to insult or dismiss genuine prominent families such as the Carder family, but to study history accurately and objectively. The people of the region and their ancestors know this family very well and have preserved the memory of its existence throughout generations. Amir Mohsen Xan (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

So you snapped these photos generations ago? If not, they don't qualify as "own work". See COM:DW and COM:EVID. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:57, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Stunning -moevagirl mahlaghajaberi ready to enjoy a perfect sunny day in style in Skylar bikini (1) (51235527884).jpg

The uploader does not own the copyright to this image, and it was taken from this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=4455978344417332&set=d41d8cd9 Houroosh (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep This photo was taken from Flickr, the link is provided and the license was confirmed. Uploader newer claim "own work". Evelino Ucelo (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Stunning -moevagirl mahlaghajaberi ready to enjoy a perfect sunny day in style in Skylar bikini (2) (51235527799).jpg

The uploader does not own the copyright to this image, and it was taken from this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=4455978421083991&set=d41d8cd9 Houroosh (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment this photo would be simultaneously posted both on Facebook and Flickr; this photo was uploaded from Flickr and the license was confirmed. So if this photo was made by Flickr's user, copyright is OK. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Copyright deletion requests/pending

File:Mahlagha Jaberi -moevagirl 6 (51234044097).jpg

The uploader does not own the copyright to this image, and it was taken from this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=4473683699313463&set=d41d8cd9 Houroosh (talk) 23:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by TERPPYCOCREA-92 (talk · contribs)

Derivative works of w:Minecraft Steve?

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:23, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep. I think that these are original enough to not be classified as copyright infringement of Steve's likeness, especially how they don't include any specific likeness of him. The voxel shape, I believe, is below originality. The only potential issue I would see is the likeness of the Slime present in File:AveryTheMayo.webp and File:Skin d'Avery.png, and even then, it may fall below originality. Crafts97 (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

On further inspection, is TERPPYCOCREA-92 the actual owner/creator of these images? It's not particularly clear whether these were obtained from a database that has licensed them, or whether these were made by this user. Crafts97 (talk) 22:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TERPPYCOCREA-92 (talk · contribs)

COM:Screenshot of some Minecraft mod

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:53, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

File:-moevagirl mahlaghajaberi wearing her shiny orange Ally swimsuit (1) (51235528429).jpg

The uploader does not own the copyright to this image, and it was taken from this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4450083525006814&set=pb.100044342653644.-2207520000&type=3 Houroosh (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Mahlagha Jaberi 23 -moevagirl (51234962178).jpg

The uploader does not own the copyright to this image, and it was taken from this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10158007302572927&set=pb.576577926.-2207520000&type=3 Houroosh (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Copyright deletion requests/pending

The uploader does not own the copyright to this image, and it was taken from this Instagram Highlight Story of 2020: https://www.instagram.com/stories/highlights/17867885671575143/?hl=en Houroosh (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Category:Copyright deletion requests/pending

Commons:Deletion requests/2026/06/03

June 3

Files in Category:Shibuya Parco in 2023

Files uploaded by FotoSV (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Danielmodestos1 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Pavlo79 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Glico Man (Dotonbori, 2014)

Files uploaded by Stephen Sarsalari (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Benten12 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Entrance sign (Legoland Billund)

Files uploaded by Ana Ngola Forgotten Souls (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Hawkarjahmed (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Alexander Zerkowitz (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Amir Mohsen Xan (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by TERPPYCOCREA-92 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by TERPPYCOCREA-92 (talk · contribs)