User talk:JarektBot/2014

Category:User talk archives#JarektBot

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Metoc/Template

The user template contained two category parameters, named Category_1 and Category_2. Your bot run should have re-added these now missing categories. Please fix this and re-run the bot. Thanks. --TMg 13:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

TMg, thanks for alerting me. I re-added all the missing categories. --Jarekt (talk) 14:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Misleading edit summary

Hi. Could edits like Special:diff/125151397 please use another edit summary than "improve license template"? That edit didn't change the license template at all. (It is also strange that it does this for the {{De}} template on that page but not for the {{Eo}} template.) darkweasel94 20:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

This is en example of a minor edit which I do while performing the main edits. I usually try to skip the minor edits if main edit are not performed, but I guess I did not do it right. Thanks for letting me know. --JarektBot (talk) 11:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Republic of China

Please don't change Republic of China (rules only Taiwan since 1949) to China (PRC), as you did in this edit. There's a major difference between the two, especially when URAA is concerned. The PRC's URAA date is 1996, while the ROC's is 2002. I've reverted your edit. -Zanhe (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

You are right. My mistake. --JarektBot (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Musée Réattu, Arles

Institution:Musée Réattu, Arles has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Olivier (talk) 20:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Wrong data item in creator template caused many problems on wikidata

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creator%3AJohann_Gottfried_Tannauer&diff=88554506&oldid=73760982 --Oursana (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that. The 4k+ wikidata links I added back then were based on either http://creatorlinks.wmflabs.org database or on wikidata page connected to wikipedia page linked with interwiki links from creator's home category. I do not know what went wrong in this case but this is the first case I knew about when those sources were wrong. --Jarekt (talk) 04:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Royal Collection, Buckingham Palace, London

Institution:Royal Collection, Buckingham Palace, London has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hanover

Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hanover has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christoph Braun (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hannover

Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hannover has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christoph Braun (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Art Association Galleries, Atlanta

Institution:Art Association Galleries, Atlanta has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Wolfgang Ratjen Foundation, Vaduz

Institution:Wolfgang Ratjen Foundation, Vaduz has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 01:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Cathedral Museum, Toledo

Institution:Cathedral Museum, Toledo has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 03:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Earl of Verulam Collection, London

Institution:Earl of Verulam Collection, London has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 06:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Huntarian Art Gallery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow

Institution:Huntarian Art Gallery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Musée Saint-Denis, Reims

Institution:Musée Saint-Denis, Reims has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Museum of Art, Carnegie Institute, Pittsburgh

Institution:Museum of Art, Carnegie Institute, Pittsburgh has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Institution:St John Museum, La Valletta

Institution:St John Museum, La Valletta has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 01:29, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Conventual Church of St. John, Valletta, Malta

Institution:Conventual Church of St. John, Valletta, Malta has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Palazzo d'Arco, Mantua

Institution:Palazzo d'Arco, Mantua has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 22:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Fondazione d'Arco, Mantua

Institution:Fondazione d'Arco, Mantua has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Monastery, Montserrat

Institution:Monastery, Montserrat has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Institution:Viscount Boyne, Bridgnorth, Shropshire

Institution:Viscount Boyne, Bridgnorth, Shropshire has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PKM (talk) 03:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:User talk archives