User talk:JarektBot/2014
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Metoc/Template
The user template contained two category parameters, named Category_1 and Category_2. Your bot run should have re-added these now missing categories. Please fix this and re-run the bot. Thanks. --TMg 13:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Misleading edit summary
Hi. Could edits like Special:diff/125151397 please use another edit summary than "improve license template"? That edit didn't change the license template at all. (It is also strange that it does this for the {{De}} template on that page but not for the {{Eo}} template.) darkweasel94 20:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Republic of China
Please don't change Republic of China (rules only Taiwan since 1949) to China (PRC), as you did in this edit. There's a major difference between the two, especially when URAA is concerned. The PRC's URAA date is 1996, while the ROC's is 2002. I've reverted your edit. -Zanhe (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Institution:Musée Réattu, Arles
Institution:Musée Réattu, Arles has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Wrong data item in creator template caused many problems on wikidata
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creator%3AJohann_Gottfried_Tannauer&diff=88554506&oldid=73760982 --Oursana (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that. The 4k+ wikidata links I added back then were based on either http://creatorlinks.wmflabs.org database or on wikidata page connected to wikipedia page linked with interwiki links from creator's home category. I do not know what went wrong in this case but this is the first case I knew about when those sources were wrong. --Jarekt (talk) 04:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Institution:Royal Collection, Buckingham Palace, London
Institution:Royal Collection, Buckingham Palace, London has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hanover
Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hanover has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Christoph Braun (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hannover
Institution:Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hannover has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Christoph Braun (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Institution:Art Association Galleries, Atlanta
Institution:Art Association Galleries, Atlanta has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Wolfgang Ratjen Foundation, Vaduz
Institution:Wolfgang Ratjen Foundation, Vaduz has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Cathedral Museum, Toledo
Institution:Cathedral Museum, Toledo has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Earl of Verulam Collection, London
Institution:Earl of Verulam Collection, London has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Huntarian Art Gallery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
Institution:Huntarian Art Gallery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Musée Saint-Denis, Reims
Institution:Musée Saint-Denis, Reims has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Museum of Art, Carnegie Institute, Pittsburgh
Institution:Museum of Art, Carnegie Institute, Pittsburgh has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:St John Museum, La Valletta
Institution:St John Museum, La Valletta has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Conventual Church of St. John, Valletta, Malta
Institution:Conventual Church of St. John, Valletta, Malta has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Palazzo d'Arco, Mantua
Institution:Palazzo d'Arco, Mantua has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Fondazione d'Arco, Mantua
Institution:Fondazione d'Arco, Mantua has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Monastery, Montserrat
Institution:Monastery, Montserrat has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Institution:Viscount Boyne, Bridgnorth, Shropshire
Institution:Viscount Boyne, Bridgnorth, Shropshire has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |