Wikimore

13 February 2026

15 February 2026

Deletion requests on 14 February 2026

February 14

File:UM Logo1.png

Possibly above COM:TOO China TransportationMEE (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Calima El Darién.png

Official Coat of Arms using a non-free licenced type font. According to the official website, the font is NT Marley, which is free only for personal use Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 00:27, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sundance awards 2026 - Hold on to Me - Myrsini Aristidou.jpg

subject has requested that photo be deleted. Another similar photo has been uploaded by a wikiportraits colleague and is now on her wikipedia page. Sarahkjoyce (talk) 01:20, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Photograph of a living person requesting removal under personality/privacy rights. Subject (Myrsini Aristidou) does not consent to continued publication of this image on Wikimedia Commons. JennaRow (talk) 21:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

I assume the photo was taken at a publicity event. So, being photographed can't have been a surprise for her. Or does she have an objection specifically against this shot? Otherwise, in case of deletion we may have to expect deletion-requests also against the other images from likely the same event. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiPortraits organizer here -- yes, this was taken at a press line, so no real surprises here (Getty has a similar photo from the same session). I spoke with the subject via email who said she doesn't like this specific photo, but liked the ones I uploaded from the film's premiere (e.g. this one). Given the uploader Sarahkjoyce requested deletion 10 days after upload (just a few days over our 7-day G7 threshold) and that we have alternative photos of Aristidou from Sundance, I think a courtesy

Delete is fair here. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

That Getty photo looks identical except for the lighting.

Keep Maybe someone could do something about the colors though, they are a bit off. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 11:09, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Danh tướng Lý Thường Kiệt.png

No EXIF data and reverse image search finds many other uses of this image with no indication of free license. Additionally, there is no freedom of panorama in Vietnam after 1/1/2023, and the earliest I could find for this image is in March-April 2023 on a news site and some spam sites. HurricaneZeta (talk) 01:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Also adding cropped version, File:Lý Thường Kiệt.png. HurricaneZeta (talk) 01:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Tandang Sora Women's Museum

Very recent building, which began construction in 2024 and completed in 2025. The plaque still lists the name of the building author, Arc Lico, at the bottom. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama under the Philippine copyright law, it is not allowed for the photographers, content creators, and netizens to reproduce buildings and monuments without permissions from the designers of those works. The most used image may be locally hosted on English Wikipedia, which is not obliged to follow restrictive Philippine laws and is only obliged to follow more lenient US laws under w:en:lex loci protectonis principle in the US. US law allows unrestricted exploitations of buildings without permissions from the architects (w:en:Freedom of panorama#United States).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Downtown Dubai (15259608683).jpg

COM:FOP UAE is not acceptable on Commons. The Address Downtown Dubai is clearly the subject of the photo, as it is so prominent while the filename also reflected this ~2026-99191-0 (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:C3lingo translation booth at 39C3.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

The focus of the photo, as shown by the file name, is the c3lingo translation setup, including the custom-made console that was newly introduced this year. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Bondage Doll.png

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep This doll is a faithful 3d copy of a human. As such, it is uncopyrightable. MarcoSwart (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Raffi kojian-lavash-103115742.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

It's a picture of lavash in the packaging, with the majority of the photo showing the lavash... RaffiKojian (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete, clearly a copyvio. Could perhaps upload a separate version with the artwork censored. Vigilant Cosmic Penguin (talk | contribs) 🐧 02:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Lady of Loreto in Primošten.jpg

Photo: Miljenko Bernfest per description, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Vakhtang Ananyan 1.jpg

No verifiable source provided to confirm dubious free license. Komarof (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Yengibaryan Olympics.png

No verifiable source provided to confirm dubious free license. Komarof (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

The questions is does it meet {{PD-Armenia}}. --RAN (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Yerevan Card 48.jpg

Dubious PD rationale, this is not an official state document. Komarof (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Yerevan Card 24.jpg

Dubious PD rationale, this is not an official state document. Komarof (talk) 05:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Betsy Carr, 2026 SOTC.jpg

Poor wuality Packer1028 (talk) 05:56, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Annobón flagmap.svg

COA is not even right, i.e. File:Bandera Annobon.png. Not used in articles. Yann (talk) 09:12, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Jpg-20170712-WA0072.jpg

No evidence of permission Dronebogus (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:0003 - Zamudio, Ivan con l'Agedo al Bologna Pride 2012 - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 9 giugno 2012 a.jpg

Image in photo under copyright Dronebogus (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

If he can prove it, of course it should be deleted. User:G.dallorto (talk) 12:13, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

@G.dallorto, according to Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, @Dronebogus does not have to "prove it."

Can you provide information that the image within this photo is not copyright? -- Ooligan (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

No. It was provided by the family of the victim, which said it was free from copyright. But there is no written contract proving it. User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ficha de detención policial de un homosexual en México.jpg

No evidence of permission Dronebogus (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Montage couvertures La cybernétique en nous.png

no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 09:38, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Nederdammen 25, mindeplade for Mathias Olesen Worm.jpg

Dublet - Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 09:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Baghuset mellem Nederdammen 23 og 25.jpg

Dublet - Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 09:44, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Viktor Kotsaba.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 09:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

No matches via Google Lens, TinyEye nor Yandex reverse image search. Image has full EXIF data. @Komarof why the assumption that this is a derivative work? Nakonana (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:V.Kotsaba.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 09:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Built for the city - Flickr - GR Pei.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 09:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I think we should not close this discussion until the flickr uploader has a chance to respond.

This is an extremely common problem. Flickr really let down their customers, because it seems obvious, even to people who are extremely well informed on intellectual property issues, that if they want to put their own images into the public domain, they should use the public domain tag flickr provided them.

I think if you look at this image, and applied a little common sense, it seems EXTREMELY LIKELY the flickr uploader is one of the vast number of good faith flickr users who wanted to put their ownimages into the public domain.

I left the following note for the flickr uploader, on this image's flickr page... Geo Swan (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I left the following note for the flickr uploader, on this image's flickr page...
Clarification please... I think (1) you took this image yourself; (2) you wanted to release it into the public domain; (3) so you put flickr's public domain mark on it If that is the case, I apologize to you, on flickr's behalf. Flickr confused you. It has confused a lot of people who are very experienced on public domain and intellectual property rights. When an image belongs to you, as it would if you snapped it with your own camera, and you want to put it in the public domain, they want you to use the cc0 license. I know, completely counter-intuitive. They want you to reserve the public domain mark for images you come across, that you believe are in the public domain -- you know, public domain due to age, or public domain because it was taken by an employee of a US Federal agency, in performance of their duties. This fine image was uploaded to the Wikimedia commons. Thank you very much for it. Unfortunately, someone has challenged your right to put it in the public domain, assuming someone else took it, and you claimed it was public domain, without any proof. I apologize for asking you to say something I am sure you thought was obvious... Could you confirm you took the image yourself? I'll check back, every so often, and inform my colleagues that you left that confirmation. Thank you for the fine image, and for your confirmation! Cheers!

File:Генерал-лейтенант Меримский Виктор Аркадьевич, 1965 год.jpg

It's a derivative work of the historical photograph that is uploaded as a own work by the uploader. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

А участник загрузивший фото, как-нибудь объясняет это...--Kalabaha1969 (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

There's another version, uploaded by the same user, with the source provided as "из архива генерала Е.И. Малашенко" ("from the archive of general E.I. Malashenko"), see File:Генерал-лейтенант Меримский В.А., 1965 год.jpg. Though, that doesn't really help this case. Nakonana (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hazbin Hotel Cast Panel.jpg

The characters on the top are copyrighted and clearly visible. Therefore, the De Minimis rule do not apply here. StomboyCarGeek (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Hazbin Hotel QA.jpg

The characters on the top are copyrighted and clearly visible. Therefore, the De Minimis rule do not apply here. StomboyCarGeek (talk) 10:27, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I've just updated the image censoring the copyrighted characters. Does this count? Should I upload it as another picture instead? Artistosteles (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Is the logo not also problematic? JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 17:26, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't think so since it is already uploaded here: "File:Hazbin_Hotel_logo.svg". Artistosteles (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Just in case I decided to censored it too. Artistosteles (talk) 01:17, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Alecu Russo State University Logo.png

It's not a state symbol. {{PD-MD-exempt}} is not applicable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ayuka Khan.jpg

File does not even claim to be own work, and the given source looks like it is invalid. If it isn't, the permission is missing anyway. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola _talk 15:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Ayuka Khan.jpg

No evidence provided that the artist released this work under a CC licence. Artist appears to have been born in 1946 and to still be alive (https://www.artgalleryif.com/en/brands/muhinspvalerijsppetrovichsplb1946rb), so the work wouldn't yet be {{PD-Ukraine}}. Belbury (talk) 11:24, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Also File:Meeting of the Kalmyk Khan Ayuki and Peter I.jpg, an uncropped version of the same painting, with the same credit and licence. Belbury (talk) 11:27, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

According to Kalmyk sources, the painter is not Valery Mukhin but Valery Montyshev (Валерий Монтышев) (which kind of also makes more sense that an Honored Artist of the Republic of Kalmykia would create a painting about a Kalmyk khan rather than a member of the National Union of Artists of Ukraine). Montyshev died in 2012, aged 59. The work won't be PD in Russia until 2083. Nakonana (talk) 19:13, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Oirat Horse Archer.jpg

Artist appears to be ru:Рокчинский,_Гарри_Олегович, who died in 1993, less than 70 years ago. Belbury (talk) 11:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

He participated in the Great Patriotic War so that the longer term of copyright protection applies (74 years p.m.a.).

On a side note: the image was uploaded by w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HorseBro the hemionus. Nakonana (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:We love education.jpg

Copyright violation. Taken from the internet Yousiphh (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

File:We love education.jpg

Low quality and copvio file. Yousiphh (talk) 12:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy keep Previously kept (July 2025). No new evidence provided since the last discussion. JaydenChao (talk)

No matches via Google Lens or TinEye. There's one match via Yandex reverse image searcg, but the uploader's name matches the name on SoundCloud. Nakonana (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cussons "Mists of the Moon" compact copper.jpg

{{SD|G7}} Historian 1875 (talk) 12:15, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

This deletion request satisfies the criteria for speedy deletion as an uploader request (criterion code G7). The request was made within the time period of less than 7 days for unused content, as set out in Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. Historian 1875 (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

File:SanAndresPrepAttackCCTV.png

This is CCTV, not a photographer's own work. Larry Hockett (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Shouldn't it just be changed to

This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it consists entirely of information produced by an automated system, such as a fixed CCTV or traffic enforcement camera, without human input; it is common property and contains no original authorship under the laws of its country of origin. Most jurisdictions do not have clear legal precedent on the copyright status of such works, see Threshold of originality § Pre-positioned recording devices for more information.

Copyright status of body camera footage by US federal and state agencies

Bodycam footage recorded by US state agencies of California, Florida or Massachusetts should use {{PD-CAGov}}, {{PD-FLGov}} or {{PD-MAGov}} instead.
Bodycam footage recorded by US agencies of the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands are for the purpose of copyright considered federal works and should either use {{PD-DCGov}} (District of Columbia), {{PD-USGov}} (Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the United States Virgin Islands), {{PD-PRGov}} (Puerto Rico) or {{PD-American Samoa}} (American Samoa) instead
Bodycam footage recorded by US agencies of the United States Minor Outlying Islands (Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Atoll, Palmyra Atoll, Wake Island and Swains Island and Navassa Island) are for the purpose of copyright considered federal works and should use {{PD-USGov}}
Bodycam footage recorded by US federal agencies should use {{PD-USGov-DOJ}}, {{PD-USGov-DEA}}, {{PD-USGov-FBI}}, {{PD-USGov-DHS}}, {{PD-USGov-DHS-CBP}} or {{PD-USGov-DHS-ICE}} instead

العربية ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ avañe'ẽ ∙ 한국어 ∙ português do Brasil ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（香港） ∙ +/−

then? AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Colegiocervantesmemorialentrance.png

likely copyvio - https://oem.com.mx/elsoldelalaguna/local/por-recomendacion-del-psicologo-alumnos-dejan-el-colegio-cervantes-18186698 Larry Hockett (talk) 12:41, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:HanauMidnightShishaBarCCTV.png

not own work Larry Hockett (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

but whos? Jimmy Crickett ~2026-10790-14 (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

hmm, given that I cannot see the reason for claiming that it is "not own work", I cannot support the deletion request. Ingmar.lippert (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Comment The "own work" claim is disproven by files own description. What is the status of security camera videos in Germany? If PD, can be kept with appropriate change of license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
See enwiki: In the law of continental European countries, works are required to be original to have copyright protection. According to a 2002 book by professor and lawyer Pascal Kamina, written before the European Court of Justice harmonised the threshold of originality between European Union member countries in 2009,[9] "it is unlikely, however, that security camera videos would be considered original". Nakonana (talk) 20:45, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Anna ja Ilmari Kallio.jpg

Listed as “In Copyright”: https://finna.fi/Record/tmk.161012350293300?lng=en-gb. Geohakkeri (talk) 12:51, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep I think the website is in error. Arthur Hedström (1918–1931) was in charge of the studio in 1926 and he died in 1931. --RAN (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Most likely in public domain. Ipr1 (talk) 02:27, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Qwen 2.5.jpg

The authorship of this logo is doubtful. The image appears to represent the Qwen AI branding, but no evidence is provided that the uploader is the original designer or has permission to release it under CC BY-SA 4.0. Request verification of authorship or permission. JaydenChao (talk) 12:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Human Penis Flachdach and erekt.jpg

Fehlerhafte Beschreibung ChrisJürgen (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Comment If the description was incorrect, it could be edited. However no objection to courtesy deletion by late (uploaded 2024) uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Baustelle Schulzentrum Hammelburg Neubau am 14.02.2026.jpg

Bild nicht mehr benötigt Lelomator (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Locomotive GT22CW - Algérie.jpg

This is a possible copyright violation - according to this website (http://emdexport.railfan.net/africa/algeria/algeria3.html) the original image was taken by Jim Claflin on June 5, 1978 in Algiers. There are no credits or tangible sources attatched to this image page on Commons. Zach1055 (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I found it on Algerian pages with credit to SNCFA workers, so I added the public domain template, which applies. However, if you are sure that the exact photograph is by Jim Claflin, then it should be deleted. RiadS99 (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

If you could provide links to the pages that you mention, maybe we can see the claims made on those websites and check who actually took the picture. Zach1055 (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I remember that it was from Facebook page with a name that sounds like Alger dans les années 970s, but I can’t recall the exact post. I’m not sure whether the images of Jim Claffin were photographs taken for SNCFA or whether they were his personal/private photos. I also don’t know if he was the one who originally took the photo or only the one who uploaded it in the website you are referring to. I can’t confirm how reliable the website is. RiadS99 (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Eye from a Tourist in Turkey.pdf

PDF falsely used for photo; photo extracted to File:Eye from a Tourist in Turkey (rotated).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Malhar Thakar.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Zuck28 as no permission (No permission since) Snehrashmi (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

@Zuck28 This image is captured by me at Gujarat Literature Festival (Vadodara-2019) which was an open public event, and the actor and the director of Gujrati films was sharing their ideas and thoughts about their film. As this image is belongs to my own photograph and i have already put "Personality rights warning" can you explain me in details that why it is nominated for the deletion? You can also check the metadata for the technical specification of the image. Snehrashmi (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Same for this cropeed version Snehrashmi (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Please send the email confirmation with the permission and it is okay. Zuck28 (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

@Zuck28 email sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org for both the files as per the the format. Thank you for the guidance. Snehrashmi (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I have just accepted permission for “File:Malhar Thakar.jpg” under ticket:2026021610000828. --JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 03:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
@JJPMaster,@Zuck28 if permission ticket is added and accepted then may i remove delete template or it will be still assessed by any volunteer? Snehrashmi (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Die Knochen eines Hingerichteten.pdf

copyright violation; no permission by author/writer. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Die Knochen eines Hingerichteten.pdf

Keine Lizenz. Zangenfabrik1820 (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Hyperion winter1140x400.jpg

Picture taken from the homepage of the manufacturer. Possible CV Mammut74 (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

The uploader never hid that fact. It's more of a use case for {{No permission since}}. —Andrei^talk 18:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:জুলাই জাতীয় সনদ - ২০২৫ ভবিষ্যতের পথরেখা.pdf

This work is published by the Government of Bangladesh after 18th September, 2023 and according to Bangladesh Copyright Act, 2023, it is deemed to be copyrighted and is subject to deletion. See for context. Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:31, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:EdictGov-Bangladesh Tausheef Hassan (talk) 18:18, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:বাংলাদেশ গেজেট, অতিরিক্ত সংখ্যা, মে ১২, ২০২৫.pdf

This work is published by the Government of Bangladesh after 18th September, 2023 and according to Bangladesh Copyright Act, 2023, it is deemed to be copyrighted and is subject to deletion. See for context. Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete per discussion - Tausheef Hassan Auntu (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Steam Controller in package.jpg

No evidence of permission Trade (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

You may want to notify the uploader, not me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand what this is about. I made the photo; I gave the permission. What more do you need? --Eike sauer (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Try Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator @Eike sauer: --Trade (talk) 18:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Ok, jumped through the hoop. I guess this wasn't a thing ten years ago? --Eike sauer (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

As far as i can tell you have always been supposed to go through VRT when uploading photos that were uploaded elsewhere first and where the license is not stated at the source. If you want this deletion request closed i suggest you make a thread on Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard @Eike sauer: --Trade (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Could you do the same for File:Steam Controller closeup.jpg and File:Steam Controller.jpg please since those are from Tumblr as well? @Eike sauer: --Trade (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Ticket:2026021410004061 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 20:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry for the confusion. I was sure the photos were made by me - but I never owned the camera they were made with, so I guess they were actually taken from Tumblr. I cannot comment on the licensing. I'm optimistic I cared for the right licence back then, but as Tumblr seems need a login, I cannot even check. Do with the photos what you find appropriate. --Eike sauer (talk) 12:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Are you or are you not the photographer of all three pictures? It's a simply binary question @Eike sauer: --Trade (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I find my last contribution quite clear?

I am not the photographer of the photos.

I do not know the photographer of the photos either.

--Eike sauer (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

So why do you believe that the photos are under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license? Trade (talk) 08:32, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

File has been deleted on 17 March 2026. --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

File:TDK photo final.jpg

Copyright issue, unsured it free. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Stadt Wettin-Löbejün Ortsteile Plötz und Kösseln.jpg

aufgrund von Problemen mit dem Urheberrecht Christian Richtscheid (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:UrubuPix.png

Superseded by UrubuPix.jpg (the intended name of Urubu_do_Pix.jpg) and UrubuPix4K.jpg Bytekast (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Znak T-22.png

Do usunięcia Krzysztof417 (talk) 17:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Alejandra Hernández, compositora y artista sonora.jpg

Previously used in self-promotion page on Spanish Wikipedia, since deleted: es:Alejandra Hernández Btrs (talk) 17:56, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Daniel Diau.png

Copyright protected BrunoGuedes1 (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

{{No source since|month=February|day=14|year=2026}} Zinnmann (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:PREM Rugby logo 2025.png

Could be a PD-textlogo anywhere, but the TOO in the UK is very low. Fma12 (talk) 21:41, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

TOO? SimplyLouis27 (talk) 21:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Under new UK threshold of originality after recent court case (see COM:TOO UK). IronGargoyle (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ktkvtsh (talk · contribs)

These drawings are not {{PD-USGov}}, as they were drawn by Samuel Little, who was not an employee of the U.S. federal government. He never dedicated these drawings to the public domain.

JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 21:50, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Kraus yy 1.tif

possible copyvio - © Dr. Davorin Wagner - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ovarialcyste mit Gefäßversorgung.jpg

possible copyvio - © Dr. Davorin Wagner - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Dr Wagner is cooperator in our common project art of surgery

Thomas Kraus is coauthor Thomas W. Kraus (talk) 22:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:IMG 10 Złotych Obverse.jpg

Violation of polish law, the polish national bank holds the copyright of polish banknotes and coins from the date of it's entry into circulation until its demonetized, partial freedom of numismatic knowledge in poland ~2026-53238-1 (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:2018-04-21-12-27-21-IMG 7260 (46219376054).jpg

COM:DW --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:CAL (también siente).png

porque quiero hacer uno nuevo Camilo pezzottyy (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Revista Academia 1977.png

This file was initially tagged by SamuelInzunza as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from this site (according to Memoria Chilena: "Intellectual property: Protected work") Very simple. Yann (talk) 22:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I was the user that tagged the image. At first I thought the file was allowed since it's a photo of a very simple magazine cover. However, I realized that the photo was not originally taken by the uploader (who claims that the file is his own work), and instead it was taken from a website of the Chilean government that generally states the intellectual property of the historical images that it hosts, either as "Patrimonio cultural común" (Common cultural heritage, equivalent to public domain) or "Obra protegida" (Protected work, i.e. still in copyright). Regardless, I would understand if other users consider that, despite being a case of COM:NETCOPYVIO, it could be allowed under a {{PD-text}} or a similar license. I leave it to the community to determine what to do with this file. SamuelInzunza (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, the whole cover is under a copyright. However cutting only this part makes it very simple. This is most probably in the public domain in USA with {{PD-text}}. Not sure what is the threshold of originality in Chile. Yann (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Epinay pano gerbaux.jpg

Incorrect Franknicht (talk) 23:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:2 cartes postales de Monza (Lombardie) et Nemi (Latium) - btv1b53160059f (4 of 4).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Fransvannes as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photographer/publisher died in 1971 Date: 19th century? Yann (talk) 23:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Reconstruction of Gribshunden by Mats Vänehem.jpg

Real author = Mats Vänehem; a famous Swedish historical illustrator. License =

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

You are free:

to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

; claim of authorship = Militärhistorikern. COPY FRAUD! Creuzbourg (talk) 23:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

@Sebastian Wallroth: See COM:TOO Australia. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 21:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/2026/02/14

February 14

Files in Category:Tandang Sora Women's Museum

Files uploaded by Ktkvtsh (talk · contribs)