Commons:Deletion requests/2026/03/18

March 18

File:MC Macau Peninsula 十月初五日街 shop 黃枝記雲吞麵店 decor 梁紀 Liang Ji painting 花鳥圖 art March 2026 R12S 02.jpg

No public interior FOP in Macau, see Commons:Freedom of panorama#Summary table. Yumeto (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:MC Macau Peninsula 十月初五日街 shop 黃枝記雲吞麵店 decor 梁紀 Liang Ji painting 花鳥圖 art March 2026 R12S 03.jpg

No public interior FOP in Macau, see Commons:Freedom of panorama#Summary table. Yumeto (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Yumeto  Speedy keep per Category:Macanese_FOP_cases/kept. JaydenChao (talk) 06:55, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
@JaydenChao, can you point to a legal case or opinion that establishes Macanese FOP for interiors accessible to the public and what the criteria for interior FOP are? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Media without a source as of 10 March 2026

no source?

Krd 06:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment Looks to me like the following are below TOO, in roughly decreasing order of my confidence in that:
That is not by any means an exhaustive list, just enough of these to make me dubious about this DR. I lean toward a procedural keep unless Krd wants to take the time to try to narrow this down to ones that are over TOO. - Jmabel ! talk 23:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
I agree with procedural keep. Lots of different logos with different levels of complexity from different countries and hence different COM:TOO /country/ to take into account. Nominate again one by one and a discussion can be held about each logo instead of all at the same time. Jonteemil (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of the House of Windsor.png

These are not the arms of the houses. Not useful for an educational purpose. DrKay (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:I beati ascendono al cielo, Cappella di San Michele (chiesa del Corlo, Lonato).jpg

Titolo errato Il Lonatese (talk) 08:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Il Lonatese: per favore, richiedi una rinomina; io non posso perché non parlo italiano. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:16, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
↓
Commons:Rinominare file Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:17, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Luis Brito, 2012.jpg

Per COM:PCP as likely copyvio. The copyright holder in the exif metadata cannot be linked to the user. Nv8200pa (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Abeja del género Eulaema 09-09-2025a.jpg

No es del género Eulaema, es del género Eufriesea. Eliminada la subiré de nuevo con el nombre de archivo correcto y nueva descripción. Carlos A. Padrón P. (talk) 11:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Abeja del género Eulaema 09-09-2025b.jpg

No es del género Eulaema, es del género Eufriesea. Eliminada la subiré de nuevo con el nombre de archivo correcto y nueva descripción. Carlos A. Padrón P. (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Abeja del género Eulaema 09-09-2025c.jpg

No es del género Eulaema, es del género Eufriesea. Eliminada la subiré de nuevo con el nombre de archivo correcto y nueva descripción. Carlos A. Padrón P. (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Abeja del género Eulaema 09-09-2025d.jpg

No es del género Eulaema, es del género Eufriesea. Eliminada la subiré de nuevo con el nombre de archivo correcto y nueva descripción. Carlos A. Padrón P. (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Abeja del género Eulaema 09-09-2025e.jpg

No es del género Eulaema, es del género Eufriesea. Eliminada la subiré de nuevo con el nombre de archivo correcto y nueva descripción. Carlos A. Padrón P. (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Please use {{Rename}} instead. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:09, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

File:California-wakeboarding17 (3997512587).jpg

random person - mass upload by Fabe56 Xocolatl (talk) 12:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment Looking at other files in category, this seems to be the only one showing that in wakeboarding sometimes people wind up in the water rather than on top of the board. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Siège social de Télé-Québec.jpg

Incoming reupload with correct licensing (actual is wrong) Dadali21 (talk) 14:17, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. Just edit the licensing as warranted, keeping in mind that you cannot retroactively revoke a free license you gave your own photo more than 1 week ago. This is indeed your own work, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

2D works at Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology

No FoP for 2D works in China. This noticeboard displays a "Table of Categories and Collection Distribution of the Chinese Library Classification". Its left side shows the Chinese Library Classification, the middle section shows the distribution areas, and the right side shows the distribution floors. The creative selection, arrangement, and typography of the table content are protected by copyright as a compilation work or a typographical design work. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. Furthermore, the Chinese Library Classification itself is protected by intellectual property rights. The Editorial Committee of the Chinese Library Classification explicitly states: "The Chinese Library Classification is the intellectual product of its Editorial Committee, and its intellectual property rights are protected by law. The original Chinese text reads:"《中国图书馆分类法》（以下简称《中图法》）是《中图法》编委会的知识产品，其知识产权受法律保护。" For reference, the statement on its official website: Chinese Library Classification --Huangdan2060 (talk) 14:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Disappointment facial expression.jpg

Unused AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2026 (UTC)


This seems to show what it says? Why is that slop? Someone might need this to show the topic or whatever. You seem to be just wanting to delete it because it is AI generated? Nesnad (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

If you wanted to illustrate emotion, you should use pictures of or by actual humans. Take File:Centreville High School (Virginia) 1998 · DD-SP-99-04111.JPEG for example. It shows real people in a relatable situation— losing a sports tournament. The context is valuable and their feelings are real and powerfully conveyed by their body language and expressions. It’s a moving picture. The only issue is it’s slightly grainy on account of being an older image. The AI goes for a SUPER-DUPER-ULTRA-6K-ULTRA-HD-ULTRA-REALISTIC hyper-closeup and and the result is something that is repulsive in its artificiality and unnecessary detail without the simple humanity of the photograph. Simply put, it’s a bad image that distracts from what it’s already illustrating poorly. Dronebogus (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Like I said before, then campaign for a rules change. As it is, you are suppose to assume good faith on the part of the uploaders and assuming they wanted to share bad images is unfair. And beyond that, you seem to think that AI makes things unworthy, but that's just an opinion. You say it's repulsive and etc but I'm not sure everyone sees the world through the same eyes. If the rules change, and we can't upload AI, then that is the way it becomes. But without that rule, I think this upload is just as valid as a photo or a drawing or a SVG file or a render from Blender etc, it's just another way that people illustrate things in the 21st century. Nesnad (talk) 19:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Beyond the aesthetics generative AI is an ethical black hole founded on rampant plagiarism that will likely be hit with a tsunami of copyright infringement cases in the coming years. On the other hand people have been using photography for 200 years and drawing and painting since… well, forever, and neither of those have the issues or divisiveness AI has. It’s the difference between using something because it does something that couldn’t be done before and using something that does the same thing as perfectly good existing technologies just because it’s new. Dronebogus (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
The same was said about photography when it came, that it would destroy "real" art and it was inferior to paintings etc etc. Many made your exact same (or similar) arguments against photography because it was mechanical and "not real" and etc etc. Ref: https://daily.jstor.org/when-photography-was-not-art/ I think you just have an irrational fear or hatred for AI work. Yes, it shouldn't be the only tool people use. But thinking it is "likely" to be considered infringement doesn't make it so, unless you are the creator of the universe. And if it were to ever be considered infringement, Wikimedia has a robust copyvio system that can handle that if need be. (You are ignoring though that some AIs aren't even trained on copyrighted works, there are many ways to train machine brains.) I do think people should use many different tools and people that only use AI should expand and try other methods of illustration, too. That said, you seem to think things are inherently bad just because they are AI, which seems unfair. Nesnad (talk) 06:59, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
We aren’t talking about fine art here. We are talking about utilitarian art. Photography largely outmoded painting as utilitarian art because it is superior to it in that field in every way. AI is not superior to photography as utilitarian art because people instinctively trust, even though image manipulation is as old as photography itself, that the “camera never lies”. And good-faith contributors on Wikimedia probably aren’t maliciously manipulating images. People associate AI with deepfakes, hoaxes, “hallucinations”, and nonsense misinformation like putting glue on pizza to make the cheese stick. And even good faith AI contributors can’t fully control those things. Dronebogus (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

It is surprisingly difficult to find good quality free educational photos of distinct human facial expressions of different emotions. Hence, in teaching v: Motivation and emotion, I also use some AI images. The quality of the AI image generations for facial expressions improves each year I teach this unit. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk

I provided an example. I don’t know how people find these hard to find. --Dronebogus (talk) 13:12, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
@Dronebogus the example you offered, in my opinion, is not a sufficiently good teaching example of a disappointed facial expression portrait and is low resolution (1,250 kb before any cropping with a dead link to the high-res version). The image is also culturally-specific (US college sporting context) rather than generic/universal.
Are you aware of other images that may be suitable e.g., for use in this lecture about 20 individual emotions and, more specifically, this slide about disappointment? -- Jtneill - Talk 13:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
File:Wayuu woman with sad face in the market buying.jpg Dronebogus (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
That's a promising candidate for illustrating disappointment (thankyou for the suggestion). However, it also shows the challenges of educatively illustrating the subtle differences in facial expression for different types of human emotions. The Wayuu woman image (as per the name of the file) better illustrates the emotion of sadness (notice the downturned mouth at the corners) or perhaps disgust (scrunched nose) which differ from the emotion of disappointment (where the mouth and nose are typically more neutral). Essentially, disappointment is more suppressive whereas sadness is more expressive.
For noting: v:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Disappointment is being edited by User:Dronebogus and myself. -- Jtneill - Talk 22:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete Inappropriate to have an AI's imagining of what an emotion might look like in a human face when we have multiple images of the real thing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete Because it's just plain inaccurate and exaggerated. However, I think the arguments for an AI illustration of emotions are valid. -ThePaleorganizer (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
    Despite what Jtneill claims I really do not think there is such a thing as a facial expression even conveying disappointment in a vacuum, because disappointment is a contextual emotion (sadness + failed expectations). I’m not an assistant professor of psychology like they are, but I would walk out of any psychology class using AI slop in a lecture. Dronebogus (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

File:SMZA 20260307 133055.jpg

Building under construction. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Aristorkle (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:SM City Zamboanga (Construction 2026-02-04).jpg

Building under construction. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Aristorkle (talk) 15:34, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Souillac.png

Not own work, watermarked. Romano1981 (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:17th Classic Off-Road Reliability Ride in Isny

Please refer to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Uploads by Fabe56 where this uploader has uploaded multiple files uncritically from Flickr. This tranche is a set of pictures of random off road motorcyclists at an event. Even though the Flicker licence is acceptable, they appear to be a collection of private pictures, many of which are duplicates or newer duplicates They appear to have no educational value. since they are unnamed and cannot be retriveed for easy use. Commons is not a host for private pictures. This diff where the uploader states "All my upload must be deleted ASAP, so do not waste time here." may be relevant. Any judged to have genuine educational value need to be renamed to reflect that and potentially have their categories adjusted

This list is truncated for the daily list. The DR itself contains significantly more files 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Menara Keagungan Limboto.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia and probably the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Armond Lloyd NFL Alumni Academy.jpg

Metadata credits Karen Medders Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Chaldean National Congress Logo.jpg

Uploader request, not clear if the copyright for the party logo is still owned by the party or if it's in the PD PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 17:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Joseph Heathcott.jpg

Apparently not own work: en:Wikipedia:Teahouse#Correcting an article of which I am the subject. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:12, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Windows screenshots

COM:DW? What's the limit of originality?

Yann (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

  •  Delete One or two words alone do not pass the threshold of originality but these images are far beyond that. In most cases, layout alone is copyright-protected. But there is even more:
  1. File:EjecutableBlender.png: Contains two computer icons that are by themselves copyright-protected.
  2. File:Win98ins1.gif: Contains one computer icon that is by itself copyright-protected.
  3. File:Win98ins2.gif: Contains one computer icon that is by itself copyright-protected.
  4. File:Win98ins6.gif: Contains four computer icons that are by themselves copyright-protected.
  5. File:Win98ins7.gif: Too many graphic assets; neither are de minimis.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 18:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

 Deleted, to complex for PD-text; Exempt #3,#8,#9 which are below COM:TOO.--Wdwd (talk) 19:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Files in Category:Windows screenshots

non-free software screenshots

JaydenChao (talk) 18:13, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@The Squirrel Conspiracy Could you close this DR? JaydenChao (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Andrea del verrocchio, morte di francesca pitti tornabuoni.jpg

very bad quality very blurry better File: Andrea del verrocchio e bottega, morte di francesca pitti tornabuoni, forse da s.m. sopra minerva a roma, 1477 ca. 01.jpg, File:Francesco di simone ferrucci, morte di francesca pitti tornabuoni, 1480 ca. (bargello) 01.jpg, File: Francesco di simone ferrucci, morte di francesca pitti tornabuoni, 1480 ca. (bargello) 01 (cropped).jpg, File:The Death of Francesco Tornabuoni.jpg Oursana (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok --Sailko (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Dr. Pamela Ramirez - QueeNoble.jpg

Not an original image of the person. Use File:Dr. Pamela Ramirez, PsyD, PhD, MD, Psychiatrist QueenNoble.jpg instead. Wikivisionnary (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Plan du "métro".png

obvious copyvio from network website : https://media-prd.myastuce.fr/uploads/assets/M_202601_9982e15dbb.pdf Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:2026 Illinois attorney general Republican primary election results map by county.svg

There wasn't a contested primary election for this office. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 18:58, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Cour-de-cassation-haiti-actunews7.jpg

The file name, quality, and lack of metadata all suggest this image was downloaded from the now defunct ActuNews7 Traumnovelle (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Pako Ayestaran 2016.jpg

Cropped version of this photograph published in 2016 https://plazadeportiva.valenciaplaza.com/plazadeportiva/pako-ayestaran-pierde-casi-todas-sus-opciones-de-seguir image has all the hallmarks of a false claim of "own work", including professional quality and lack of metadata Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Pako Ayestaran 2016 (Cropped).jpg

Image is cropped from this one published in 2016 https://plazadeportiva.valenciaplaza.com/plazadeportiva/pako-ayestaran-pierde-casi-todas-sus-opciones-de-seguir Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Pako Ayestaran Press Conference 2014.png

Cropped from here, published by club in 2015 https://www.maccabi-tlv.co.il/en/2015/04/pako-the-title-race-is-not-over/ Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Turkiye Kürtleri.png

Description is the most vile thing i ever read ~2026-17315-65 (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Why is that a reason to delete a file? File descriptions can be changed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BrugesFR (talk · contribs)

These are all old images/postcards from 1910 or later, tagged with {{PD-old-100}}. None have evidence that the photographer/creator died 100 years ago, and they are not 120 years old as needed by {{Pd-old-assumed}}.

To see all 44 items in this DR, see the following search link: Delete "23:21, 16 March 2026"

Consigned (talk) 23:21, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Some may be PD, but without better sourcing and licensing this cannot be determined; no evident progress in sorting any to be kept. (No prejudging reuploading of any that can be shown to be PD with proper info and license.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BrugesFR (talk · contribs)

Old photos/postcards tagged with {{Self}} / {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Definitely not own work or CC licensed; not yet 120 years old needed for {{PD-old-assumed}}.

Consigned (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Some may be PD, but without better sourcing and licensing this cannot be determined; no evident progress in sorting any to be kept. (No prejudging reuploading of any that can be shown to be PD with proper info and license.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by BrugesFR (talk · contribs)

Photos/postcards from 1940 and later all tagged with {{PD-old}} or some variant. Missing evidence that photographer died over 70 years ago.

Consigned (talk) 00:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep The Mexican ones. {{PD-Mexico}} Tbhotch™ 02:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Specifically do you mean the last part of PD-Mexico, Anonymous works are considered in the public domain until the author or the owner of the rights are identified? -Consigned (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Specifically I mean "It is an artistic or literary work published before 1918" for files published before 1918". For others I refer to the text you highlighted, example: File:Emiliano Zapata and followers.jpg. Tbhotch™ 07:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by BrugesFR (talk · contribs)

Files missing source - unable to confirm they're PD, particularly in the US which may depend on publication date (COM:HIRTLE).

Consigned (talk) 19:36, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep All appear to be PD, the newest is 1908 and the earliest is 1867. --RAN (talk) 22:52, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Marc Bouwer Fall 2004 Runway at New York Fashion Week.jpg

questionable own work - if the uploader really is the well-known fashion photographer indicated in the metadata, VRT permission is needed Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I have no objection to the photo deletion, It was intended as a test upload to replace the unrelated photo of Marilyn Monroe. However, I would like to revert to the last edit which corrected the background of the dress. It is cited that the dress was a runway piece, and there is no proper documentation that the designer used Marilyn as an inspiration. I see that if I revert, the runway pic is still on the page, what is the best way to resolve? Cryptoline (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:La Shawn Ford 2019 Chicago mayoral forum December 2018.jpg

The resolution on this image incredibly low and there are numerous, other photos on Wikimedia Commons that show LaShawn Ford and more that can be found on Paul Goyette's Flickr. Mpen320 (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

STRONG KEEP; this photo was previously used in numerous articles, having for years been the best available commons illustration of Ford on Commons. Therefore, deleting this would corrupt the page histories of those articles SecretName101 (talk) 21:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Images on Wikimedia Commons are meant to educate. There is no educational value to this image. If this image were provided to a search and rescue team, he'd be a goner. We have an entire tag: subst:delete|reason=Low resolution/quality for these situations that I regret only learning about now. Also, we delete copyrighted images and that does not destroy page history, so why would this?-- Mpen320 (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
    @Mpen320 this was previously the best-available commons compliant image for the individual. Hence, it was widely used in page histories of articles related to him. Those page histories would be corrupted by a deletion, as the image that was used could no longer be rendered as they appeared. SecretName101 (talk) 06:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

File:2019 Chicago mayoral forum December 2018 (1).jpg

The resolution on this image incredibly low and there are numerous, other photos on Wikimedia Commons that show the subjects. There is also the photo from which this was cropped. There is not a value add to retaining this image. Mpen320 (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep The existence "other photos" of a subject is not a standard reason for deletion. If I recall, this image was previously used on Wikipedia; and if so, its deletion would diminish the page history of any articles it appeared in. SecretName101 (talk) 06:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
The reason for the deletion is that this the Chicago mayoral forum equivalent of Emil Wakim's unusable photo that is no longer used on his page and exists on Wikimedia Commons as an example of an unusable photo. The fact I mention there are other photos is to explicitly preempt your point that this would somehow diminish page histories, which is untrue. This image serves no education purpose and makes it eligible for deletion.--Mpen320 (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
After some searching, I'd like to elaborate my position is best phrased as Per Commons:Project_scope#Scope_part_1:_Files, every file must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. This extracted image serves no such purpose as the subjects are shot in such a low resolution as to make them too difficult to identify.--Mpen320 (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
@Mpen320 STRONG disagree. There is no alternative public domain photo depicting just these three particular individuals (each notable) debating each other. There is very much a realistic use for an educational purpose. SecretName101 (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
I would say File:2019 Chicago mayoral forum December 2018 (a).jpg does what you are describing adequately without a poor resolution cropping. There is no debate in this photo as the other photo demonstrates it is Willie Wilson speaking.--Mpen320 (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
It does not. It includes a much broader number of candidates. Also, the rationale you are using is not supported anyways by the existence of other photos that can serve the same educational purpose. It is for photos that cannot reasonably serve an educational purpose. That rationale does not apply to this photo, plain and simple. SecretName101 (talk) 21:42, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

File:C'est un rêve-All of me - chanson - 1 voix et piano - musique de Seymour Simons et Gerald Marks ; paroles de Seymour Simons et Gerald Marks ; Jean Sareil - btv1b107811570 (1 of 4).jpg

This file comes from Gallica along with others showing sheet music of the song "All of me". The files were presumably uploaded automatically. However, looking at the dates of those involved in the song, it is likely to be protected by copyright.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Dieter Rudolph, Skulptur 1969.jpg

Die Seite wurde von mir irrtümlich hochgeladen. Der Bildhauer der Skulptur ist nicht Dieter Rudolph sondern Arnold Schamretta (hat keinen WP Eintrag) Rogald (talk) 21:24, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Ich denke, das Foto kann auf Commons bleiben. Es braucht bloß einen neuen Namen ({{Rename}}). Nakonana (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Agreed. @Rogald, just change the file description as appropriate and request COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Ich wollte das Foto umbenennen in Schamretta. Dieser hat aber keinen WP Eintrag, deshalb wollte ich die ganze File löschen. Wäre aber schade. So stehen lassen? Rogald (talk) 21:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Sollte als Kunst im öffentlichen Raum auf Commons bleiben dürfen, selbst wenn es zum Bildhauer keinen Wiki Artikel gibt. Die Relevanzhürde bei Commons ist deutlich niedriger als bei WP. Ich sehe also weiterhin keinen Löschgrund. Nakonana (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

File:SINAMOS Logo Peru.svg

El logo es obra de w:Jesús Ruiz Durand, nacido en 1970 y aún vivo. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:05, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

So does any of this violate the Peruvian copyright law as stated on the file? NorthTension (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
La imagen tiene copyright. El autor sigue vivo. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:43, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes but "This work was not credited or nor registered its name in the National Copyright Registry 15 years after its publication".
Is this incorrect? Can you give me something to disprove this. NorthTension (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Así no funciona. Tú debes probar que no estaba registrado, porque ante la duda no deberíamos suponer lo contrario. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 07:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

File:26 Baku Commissars Memorial, 1980.jpg

Copvio. Author of the photo is Oleg Litvin (Q32406050) (d. 2017). Yousiphh (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sport car in Baku - 1960.jpg

Copvio. Author and owner of this photo is Levan Taktakishvili (Q12866199) (d. 2005). Yousiphh (talk) 22:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)