File:Putney Pushing CCTV.webm

The licnes used for CCTV footage is not applicable to the United Kingdom where this footgae was captured. The UK does not as far as I know have an exception for security camera footage with a known author. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Nevertheless, this footage has author, or it was captured in fully automatic mode? In second case, copyright can't exist. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

United Kingdom doesn't have an exception for automated capture as I understood, If you have a link to relevant UKIPO guidance or English caselaw, please cite it here :)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comment if this video is deleted, then so must the rest of the content in the Putney Pusher category, as they are also CCTV footage. Also worth noting that all the footage was released by Met Police, if that makes a difference. I am unsure on whether the above statements are true; to my knowledge, CCTV footage generally is public domain as it requires no human input. This particular footage was captured from a bus automatically. jolielover♥talk 02:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Risco de Não Superação da Cláusula de Barreira em 2026.png

Out of scope: AI-generated infographic. The accuracy of AI-generated infographics is often questionable, and they cannot easily be corrected. Content consisting in large part of plain text should be presented as text in a wiki article, not in an image. Omphalographer (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

The infographic's content is also present in text within the only article that uses the image. The information contained in it is exactly the same as in the text. There are no errors to correct. It simply illustrates what is already in the text using colors. There's no need to remove it. Daniel Silva Mendanha (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Given the possibility of correction, I've already corrected the image twice. Now there are no more errors. There's nothing preventing the image from being corrected again if necessary. Daniel Silva Mendanha (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Katon-Karagay National Park 05.png

Out of scope: this image was generated or modified using AI. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 05:41, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

The image was created entirely by me and only slightly "embellished" with an online filter. Unfortunately, the original photo has been deleted, but there are other images from this photo shoot available. SlipKOT86 (talk) 10:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Linux Malware Protection Diagram.png

Out of scope: AI-generated infographic. The accuracy of AI-generated infographics is often questionable, and they cannot easily be corrected. Content consisting in large part of plain text should be presented as text in a wiki article, not in an image. Omphalographer (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

@我是一隻熊本熊: 兩件事：

1. 你的圖疑似AI生成。這種圖資訊通常不準確且極難更正。
2. 這種挾帶大量文字的圖片，在條目中通常是以文字呈現。

可以解釋一下你的圖是怎麼做的嗎？ Saimmx (talk) 19:47, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Bettyglan.jpg

This is a duplicate of File:Betti Glan 1927.jpg. The link to the source is located there, but the link to the source here does not work. S.Marchenko (talk) 06:34, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

It is not a duplicate. The link opens through Wayback Machine, though I don't see this image there and I don't see any evidence of the license. Well very well (talk) 10:47, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, no, the image (probably) is there, but wasn't archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20171215094207im_/http://bg.ru/media/upload/images/bettyglan.jpg
But the license seems to be completely wrong — bg.ru isn't affiliated with mos.ru? And I'm not even sure bg.ru had rights on this picture (it's said to be "from archive of Gorky Park"). Well very well (talk) 10:50, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid in February 1993.jpg

Delete. The current public-domain claim appears invalid. The file is not merely a reproduction of a newspaper's published edition, but a cropped photograph published in The Straits Times on 24 February 1993. While Singapore law provided a limited term of protection for published editions, that does not automatically place the underlying photograph itself in the public domain. No information has been provided regarding the photographer, the original source of the photograph, the circumstances of its creation, or the copyright status of the underlying image. The photograph was published in 1993 and therefore would clearly still have been under copyright protection on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. Consequently, even if the newspaper's published-edition right has since expired, that alone is insufficient to demonstrate that the underlying photograph is free in the United States. The file currently lacks any evidence showing that the photograph itself was in the public domain in its source country on the URAA date or that it otherwise qualifies for Commons. The fact that the image dates from the former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad era, or depicts a historically significant Malaysian military figure, is irrelevant to the copyright analysis. Historical significance does not create a copyright exception. Commons requires verifiable evidence that the underlying work is freely licensed or in the public domain in both the source country and the United States. Without evidence establishing the copyright status of the underlying photograph, the current licensing claim cannot be verified and the file fails COM:PRP. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

You must read again about license who issued by singapore government that in the license not stated that file not must under U.S. public domain. You can see preview of Template:PD-SG-edition and there is not stated that the file must under U.S. public domain. If system ask to list the U.S. license at once with SG license, I don't want to upload that file because it could lead to problems later. I hope you understand. Thank you. Elfath1421 (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

The issue is not whether Template:PD-SG-edition itself mentions a U.S. public-domain tag. Commons licensing policy independently requires that files be free both in the source country and in the United States. PD-SG-edition only addresses the copyright status of a published edition under Singapore law. It does not establish that the underlying photograph was in the public domain on the URAA restoration date or otherwise free in the United States. Therefore the copyright status of the underlying photograph remains unresolved. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 10:04, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Lehnert et Landrock - 015.jpg

This file has been tagged for speedy deletion by ~2026-35529-13 with following reason (sic): "possible exploit, review required". Converted to regular DR for this review (non-obvious case for SD).) Evelino Ucelo (talk) 08:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Nonsense speedy by IP, should have simply been reverted. --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:DOM LA NENA.jpg

This file has been tagged as advertising by Geoffroi. This photo isn't clearly promotional. Converted to regular deletion request for possible feedback. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 08:42, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Not a notable musician so not in scope. Uploader has record company name hence my G10 nom. @Evelino Ucelo: Keep your advice to yourself please and stick to showing how this isn't a promotional image. Thanks. Geoffroi 16:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep this photo has good quality. Promotional images sometimes is in COM:SCOPE. Uploader with company name by itself isn't a reason for G10. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Domlanena.jpg

This file has been tagged as advertising by Geoffroi. This photo depicts the musician in her work, and is in COM:SCOPE. @Geoffroi: please make SDRs only in obvious cases, thanks. Converted to regular deletion request for possible feedback. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Not a notable musician so not in scope. Uploader has record company name hence my G10 nom. @Evelino Ucelo: Keep your advice to yourself please and stick to showing how this isn't a promotional image. Thanks. Geoffroi 16:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep I think that this photo has adequate quality, and still useful, even if the musician itself isn't notable. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Bosco in Città.jpg

Mancanza di Libertà di Panorama in Italia per edifici moderni (No Freedom of Panorama in Italy) Erasmus 89 (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. Italy has a high threshold of originality, and these seem like mundane utilitarian buildings. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:39, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Particolare della tribuna e di un campo da tennis coperto al Centro Sportivo Comunale - Brugherio.jpg

Mancanza di Libertà di Panorama in Italia per edifici moderni (No Freedom of Panorama in Italy) Erasmus 89 (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. Italy has a high threshold of originality, and these seem like mundane utilitarian buildings. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:38, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Edilnord - particolare.jpg

Mancanza di Libertà di Panorama in Italia per edifici moderni (No Freedom of Panorama in Italy) Erasmus 89 (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Studi QVC.jpg

Mancanza di Libertà di Panorama in Italia per edifici moderni (No Freedom of Panorama in Italy) Erasmus 89 (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Particolare della tribuna nel Centro Sportivo Comunale - Brugherio.jpg

Mancanza di Libertà di Panorama in Italia per edifici moderni (No Freedom of Panorama in Italy) Erasmus 89 (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. Italy has a high threshold of originality, and these seems like mundane utilitarian sports stands. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:41, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Scuola elementare Sciviero 01.jpg

mancanza di autorizzazione per un bene pubblico soggetto al Codice dei Beni Culturali italiano (riferimento al progetto WiBrugherio del 2014 per il quale mancava la necessaria autorizzazione) Erasmus 89 (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:A BUILDING IN AYEGUN COMMUNITY.jpg

no metadata, very likely not own work. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

hi @SomeFancyUsername this work is my own work that was took with my camera,I was stated clearly during the upload of the image that it is own work,I didn't see the reason why it was nominated for deletion Abike25 (talk) 21:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:A newly completed building.jpg

COM:FOP Nigeria SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:03, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Bauchi state university senate building.jpg

COM:FOP Nigeria SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Benue wonder.jpg

COM:FOP Nigeria SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Nicolina Church exterior.jpg

Looks like a recent building. No FOP in Romania. Gikü (talk) 11:06, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Comment the building was constructed somewhere before 1975 SomeFancyUsername (talk) 11:16, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Women police in Singapore 1950.jpg

Delete. Although this photograph may now be in the public domain in Singapore, that alone is insufficient for Commons. The file description itself acknowledges that the work may still be copyrighted in the United States because copyright was restored under the URAA if the work remained protected in Singapore on 1 January 1996. According to the licensing information, this is a Singapore government photograph taken in 1950. Under Singapore copyright law, such photographs remained protected well beyond 1996. Therefore the work was not in the public domain in its source country on the URAA date, and U.S. copyright restoration is a serious concern. Commons requires works to be free both in the source country and in the United States. A comparable case was discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where an old Singapore photograph from the late 1940s or early 1950s was deleted specifically due to URAA concerns ("Deleted: per nomination -URAA copyright."). The same principle appears applicable here. Unless evidence can be provided demonstrating that the photograph is free in the United States despite URAA restoration concerns, the file does not meet Commons licensing requirements and should be deleted. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Francis Thomas in 1950, teaching a class.jpg

Delete. The file is currently licensed only under PD-SG-photo. While a photograph taken in 1950 may now be in the public domain in Singapore because more than 70 years have passed since it was taken, that alone is insufficient for Commons. According to Commons licensing requirements, a work must be free both in its source country and in the United States. This photograph was taken in 1950 and was still under copyright protection in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. Therefore, U.S. copyright restoration must be considered. No U.S. public-domain license or evidence addressing the file's status under the URAA has been provided. A similar issue was previously discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where an old Singapore photograph was deleted because it remained protected on the URAA date and therefore could not be hosted on Commons. Without evidence demonstrating that this photograph is also free in the United States, the current licensing claim is incomplete and the file does not satisfy Commons licensing requirements. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:16, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Maria Hertogh and Mansoor Adabi, 1950.png

Delete. Although the file is tagged with PD-SG-photo, the photograph appears to have remained under copyright in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. The image was taken in 1950 and published by The Straits Times, but there is no evidence that its copyright had expired in Singapore by 1996. As a result, U.S. copyright would have been restored under the URAA. Commons requires works to be free both in the source country and in the United States. This is similar to the reasoning accepted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the late 1940s–early 1950s was deleted due to URAA concerns. Without evidence that this photograph was in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA date, the file does not meet Commons licensing requirements and should be deleted. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Bai Yan, 1950.jpg

Delete. The file is tagged with PD-SG-photo on the basis that it was taken in 1950. However, even if the photograph is now in the public domain in Singapore, there is no evidence that it was in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. A photograph taken in 1950 would clearly still have been under copyright protection at that time, resulting in restoration of U.S. copyright under the URAA. Commons requires works to be free both in the source country and in the United States. This is consistent with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, which was deleted due to URAA concerns involving a Singapore photograph from the late 1940s–early 1950s. Without evidence that this photograph was public domain in Singapore on the URAA date, the file does not satisfy Commons licensing requirements. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:David Baszucki 1985 yearbook.png

As this is a photograph and not "a printed literary, musical, or dramatic work", the lack of a year in the copyright notice would not have rendered it defective. The photo is therefore still considered to be copyrighted. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 12:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, note that this might be likely a printed literary work (book), not a photograph per the stanford.edu source, the resource type is classified as text and its genre is yearbooks. According to copyright.gov source, it says a literary work is a work that is expressed in words, numbers, symbols, rather than a dramatic or novel work, the work likely sits in the category "Book (Fiction / Non-Fiction)", "Text w/Artwork included", and "Serial Publications". Cropping the photo is still a derivative work of stanford quad yearbook. (note that I am not attorney) Artemhao (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

I believe the law would treat the copyright of the two elements of a publication (the printed text and the photos) differently. I interpret the guide as saying a copyright notice within a publication which would not apply for literary text, but would for photos, means that the notice does protect the photos within such a publication without providing protection for text. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 16:35, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Delete, actually, since we have COM:PRP, i think I'd choose the vote to delete, because I am unsure if the photo is a derivative work of photograph or literary. Artemhao (talk) 16:32, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

That information is for before 1978 only from 1978-89 2207.7(E) says "The year of publication may be omitted from a notice when a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work with accompanying text (if any) is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or a useful article." this meets none of them but 2205.1(E) also says the year of a periodical can be considered part of the notice 999REAL 💬 ⬆ 18:38, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ernest Pattison Shanks, Attorney-General Singapore, and family.jpg

Delete. The file is tagged with PD-SG-photo solely because it is stated to have been taken in 1950. However, there is no evidence that the photograph was in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. A photograph created in 1950 would clearly still have been under copyright protection at that time, resulting in restoration of U.S. copyright under the URAA. The author is unknown and no information has been provided regarding the copyright status of the underlying photograph. Commons requires works to be free in both the source country and the United States. This appears similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, which was deleted due to URAA copyright concerns involving a Singapore photograph from the same period. Without evidence that the photograph was public domain on the URAA date, the current licensing claim is insufficient and fails COM:PRP. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:29, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep (Uploader) Out of copyright in Singapore, the place of publication. I believe there is rationale which allows the use of the image as fair use under United States copyright law. C411978 (C411978)

C411978 (talk) 08:19, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment (Uploader) Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA concluded that URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion.

C411978 (talk) 08:45, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Tan Lark Sye, 1950.jpg

Delete. The file is tagged with PD-SG-photo because it was taken in 1950. However, there is no evidence that the photograph was in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. A photograph taken in 1950 would clearly still have been under copyright protection at that time, resulting in restoration of U.S. copyright under the URAA. The current licensing information does not establish that the photograph was free in both Singapore and the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, which was deleted due to URAA copyright concerns involving a Singapore photograph from the same period. The historical significance of Tan Lark Sye does not affect the copyright analysis. Without evidence that the underlying photograph was public domain on the URAA date, the file fails COM:PRP. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:32, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Robert Foulger, Chief of Police, Singapore.png

Delete. The file is tagged with PD-SG-photo solely because it is stated to have been taken in 1950. However, there is no evidence that the underlying photograph was in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. The author is unknown, and no information has been provided regarding the copyright status of the original photograph. A photograph published in 1950 would still have been under copyright protection in Singapore in 1996, resulting in restoration of U.S. copyright under the URAA. The image appears to have been extracted from a digitised newspaper article. Even if rights relating to the newspaper publication itself have expired, that does not automatically establish that the underlying photograph is free. Commons requires verifiable evidence that a work is free in both the source country and the United States. Similar Singapore photographs from the same period have previously been deleted due to URAA copyright concerns, including Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg. Without evidence that the photograph was public domain on the URAA date, the current licensing claim fails COM:PRP. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:35, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Keep, (Uploader) Out of copyright in Singapore, the place of publication. I believe the use of the image qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. C411978 (C411978)

C411978 (talk) 08:20, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment (Uploader) Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA concluded that URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C411978 (talk • contribs) 08:44, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

File:David Marshall, 1950.jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo on the basis that the photograph was taken in 1950. However, there is no evidence that the underlying photograph was in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA restoration date of 1 January 1996. The file identifies Singapore Press Holdings as the author/source, but provides no information demonstrating that copyright had expired by 1996. A photograph from 1950 would ordinarily still have been under copyright protection in Singapore on the URAA date, resulting in restoration of U.S. copyright. Wikimedia Commons requires a work to be free in both the source country and the United States. The current licensing information establishes only that the photograph may now be public domain in Singapore; it does not establish freedom in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, which was deleted due to URAA copyright concerns involving a Singapore photograph from the same era. Without evidence that the photograph was public domain on the URAA date, the file fails COM:PRP. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:37, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Song Kok Hoo.jpg

Delete. The file is tagged with PD-SG-photo, but the licensing information itself acknowledges that U.S. copyright may have been restored under the URAA because the work was still protected in Singapore on 1 January 1996. If so, the file is not free in the United States and cannot be hosted on Commons. The photograph was taken in 1950 and no evidence has been provided showing that it was already in the public domain in Singapore on the URAA restoration date. Commons requires works to be free in both the source country and the United States. The current licensing claim establishes only present-day public-domain status in Singapore, not freedom in the United States. This issue is comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, which was deleted due to URAA copyright concerns involving a Singapore photograph from the same period. As in that case, no evidence has been provided that the underlying photograph was public domain on the URAA date. Without such evidence, the file fails COM:PRP. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Tranchot Eekerwaeg Maesbaene.jpg

Enyavar (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe, 1951.jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1951 and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe.jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1951 and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe c. 1950 (1).jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1950 and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:53, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe c. 1950 (2).jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1950 and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Vaundy 2025.jpg

AIにて生成された画像です ~2026-35669-75 (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe c. 1950 (3).jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1950 and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe c. 1950 (4).jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1950 and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Richard Lim Chuan Hoe, 1940s.jpg

Delete. The file is licensed solely under PD-SG-photo, which establishes only that the photograph is currently public domain in Singapore. No evidence has been provided that the work was also public domain in the United States or that it escaped copyright restoration under the URAA. The photograph was taken in 1940s and the author is identified as Richard Lim Chuan Hoe. The file page does not provide any evidence regarding the author's date of death or any basis demonstrating that U.S. copyright was not restored on 1 January 1996. Under COM:PRP, the burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free both in the source country and in the United States. This appears comparable to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg, where a Singapore photograph from the same period was deleted because freedom in the United States had not been established. In the absence of evidence addressing the URAA issue, the file should not be hosted on Commons. ~2026-35414-11 (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by باسم (talk · contribs)

Historical photographs which have been modified using AI software. Under COM:AIIP, links to the original source images must be provided for comparison.

• File:Abu Al-Hasan Qasim Al-Kasti.png
• File:Beirut's Governor 1905.png
• File:Omar Bey Al-Daouk.png
• File:Abdülhâlik Nasuhi Bey.jpg
• File:Prominants from Beirut.jpg

Belbury (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

@Belbury I'll upload the originals as well. I didn't do it originally because they are very bad. This is a cropped online copy of one of them (modified version)-- باسم (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Off-site links are enough, although originals are preferable if possible, as it means that projects that disallow the AI upscaling of historical images (such as the English and German Wikipedias) can use them instead. Belbury (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

@Belbury  Done. Check below please. Is it necessary to crop Abdülhâlik Nasuhi from the original picture as well, or is it enough since the original photo is now available?-- باسم (talk) 07:55, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

 Delete we don’t need the AI slopified versions Dronebogus (talk) 13:34, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

• File:Abu Al-Hasan Qasim Al-Kasti.png  Done. Check Original
• File:Beirut's Governor 1905.png  Done. Uploaded original file here since its almost 100% identical
• File:Omar Bey Al-Daouk.png  Done. Uploaded original file here since its almost 100% identical
• File:Prominants from Beirut.jpg  Done. Check Original

File:La rivière sanzu Ruyigi.jpg

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:La_rivi%C3%A8re_sanzu.jpg&oldid=1232462861 Wmbata (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:La rivière sanzu à Ruyigi.jpg

Out of scope, not useful Wmbata (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Beaucoup des flots dans la rivière mubarazi.jpg

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Flots_dans_la_rivi%C3%A8re.jpg&oldid=1232947664 Wmbata (talk) 15:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Autistic Pride Day Logo Colour Gradient.svg

This is likely above the threshold of originality in Australia per COM:TOO Australia. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1860.png

File is an inferior duplicate of File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1860.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KT1988.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1988.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KY1992.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1992.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:18, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KY1996.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1996.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:19, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KY1984.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1984.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KY2000.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 2000.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KY2004.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 2004.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ky 2010 election.svg

File has been superseded by File:2010 United States Senate election in Kentucky results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:25, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KY 5TH.png

File has been superseded by File:2022 Kentucky's 5th congressional district election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ky gov 19 cd.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:2019 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by congressional district.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ky-gov-2011.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:2011 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:1979 Kentucky gubernatorial election democratic primary results map by county.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:1979 Kentucky gubernatorial election democratic primary results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:2003 Kentucky gubernatorial Republican primary county map.svg

File has been superseded by File:2003 Kentucky gubernatorial election Republican primary results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Brasão Frantz.jpg

Looks like self-promotion, out of scope and/or COM:NOTHOST GerritR (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

GerritR, the purpose of publishing this coat of arms was not promotion, but just making easily available a symbol which was actually adopted by some branches of a very large brazilian family, in order that all branches might find it and decide wether they will adopt it or not. just that. Commons files are not required to be used only on Wiki projects, but are made available to all people for all purposes. Coats of arms are symbols of identity, of a shared history, they have meaning and social and historical value. we have on Commons thousands of coats of arms, they were published to provide relevant information about families (as this one I'm sure does), and many of them are not in current use. why precisely this one has to be deleted? this file, since its publication here, was viewed 1.333 times, so, it seems there is significant interest in it. tetraktys (talk) 19:39, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

It's newly invented, and the purpose is to promote a family. So there is no eduacational value. GerritR (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

GerritR, every CoA was invented in some point of time. tons of CoAs are currently being invented, by official institutions or private users, and still they are valid. the date is not relevant to the discussion. and the purpose was not to promote a family. you keep saying that without any proof and don't listen to my arguments. the purpose was to create a symbol of identity for a specific family, as every other CoA was intended to do. that's what heraldry does. this CoA was actually adopted, it's a fact of the world, and can be used by anyone for many purposes, including educational, as every other CoA. but you decided that this one is entirely different from the others. I can't see why. tetraktys (talk) 21:55, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Elección gubernamental de Kentucky 1923.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:1923 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Elección gubernamental de Kentucky 1927.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:1927 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Eleição para governador do Kentucky em 2011.jpg

File has been superseded by the svg File:2011 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:45, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Kentucky Governor D Primary 2019.svg

File has been superseded by the svg File:2019 Kentucky gubernatorial election Democratic primary results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:48, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

keep, superseding doesn't mean it should be deleted, the map is still useful. Kingofthedead (talk) 21:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Kentucky Governor R Primary 2019.svg

File has been superseded by the svg File:2019 Kentucky gubernatorial election Republican primary results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

keep, superseding doesn't mean it should be deleted, the map is still useful. Kingofthedead (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ky-gov-2011-2.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:2011 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ky-gov-2011-3.png

File has been superseded by the svg File:2011 Kentucky gubernatorial election results map by county.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Radium source.jpg

Uploader request: clearer version uploaded as File:Radium radioactive source.jpg. This file is no longer needed. 范皓程 (talk) 19:22, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

•  Comment. I don't think the second image is necessarily superior. They are both fine, but the second one has a sharper bottle but a blurrier object within the bottle. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

File:CEO David Zaslav of Warner Bros 01.jpg

This file was initially tagged by PhilKnight as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation. Source does not indicate free use and uploader does not own photo. Yacàwotçã (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep no valid reason for deletion Yacàwotçã (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep as this is indeed the work of a US Gov employee. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

File:CEO David Zaslav of Warner Bros 01.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sean1493 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image is not licensed for free use and is sourced from X which does not denote free use https://x.com/USAmbItaly/status/2019834700299436185 Ankry (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep as this is indeed the work of a US Gov employee. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

File:CEO David Zaslav of Warner Bros 02.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sean1493 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image is not licensed for free use and is sourced from X which does not denote free use https://x.com/USAmbItaly/status/2019834700299436185 Ankry (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:CEO David Zaslav of Warner Bros 02 (cropped).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sean1493 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Licensed by US State Gov is wrong. Source is an X post and authorship is not verified. No evidence of PD-USGov status or free license. There is no proof the uploader or embassy actually took the photo. Ankry (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:CEO David Zaslav of Warner Bros 03 (cropped).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sean1493 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Licensed by US State Gov is wrong. Source is an X post and authorship is not verified. No evidence of PD-USGov status or free license. There is no proof the uploader or embassy actually took the photo. Ankry (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

File:LaurenceOlivierToMiaKuryluk.jpg

Just like the Vivien Leigh photo from the same uploader, the license is not correct. The photographer is unknown as stated in the description. SeptemberWoman (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep It looks like a publicity picture that circulated in the USA and UK. I can find no copyright registration for the image or a copyright renewal. --RAN (talk) 03:43, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

  Do all of the listed critieria of the PD-1996 license apply? And how would you even search for a copyright registration without a numbering? SeptemberWoman (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

File:2026DaveCantin.jpg

duplicate Wcucat (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Vincentkeizer (talk · contribs)

Flickr washing

• File:Sven Schoemer Ferrari Challenge interview 2026.jpg
• File:Sven Schömer Spielberg 2026 paddock.jpg
• File:Sven Schömer Ferrari Challenge podium.jpg
• File:Sven Schömer Mugello 2026 victory 2.jpg
• File:Sven Schömer Mugello 2026 victory.jpg
• File:Sven Schömer Spielberg 2026 paddock 2.jpg
• File:Sven Schoemer Hanseatic Delifood portrait 2026.jpg
• File:Sven Schoemer Hanseatic Delifood portrait 2026 3.jpg
• File:Sven Schoemer Hanseatic Delifood portrait 2026 2.jpg

Didym (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Didym,

Could you please elaborate on why you created the deletion request and what I did wrong? I am fairly new to this, so would love to hear your feedback!

Kind regards,

Vincent Vincentkeizer (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026063010003247 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:02, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026070310003617 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:01, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Lucio Fulci.jpg

As the licensing tag says, this is under copyright in the United States since it was not created after 1975 or published after 1977. hinnk (talk) 23:14, 18 June 2026 (UTC)