Commons:Deletion requests/2026/07/19
July 19
File:Andreas Hamberger 2026.jpg
Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- **Update:** I have successfully located the original, unedited raw camera photograph and uploaded it to overwrite the AI-enhanced file, fulfilling the nominator's request. The current file is now 100% organic human work with no AI modifications. This request can now be safely closed as kept. Andreashamberger (talk) 04:48, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Delete personal photo by non-contributor. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Delete per above. --Saroj (talk) 06:23, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Francesco Di Bartolo, ritratto di Giacomo Di Bartolo Cittadino catanese 2.png
Out of scope: this image was generated or modified using AI. If this image is of a real, freely licensed work of art, please upload an unmodified version. Omphalographer (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not an AI-generated portrait, but a faithful digital derivative of an authentic nineteenth-century etching by Francesco Di Bartolo. The only intervention was the lightening of the dark paper background, necessary to improve the visibility of the engraved lines and details. The portrait, facial features, clothing, composition and engraved work were not intentionally altered or invented.
- The unmodified photograph is available here.
- The derivative has now been explicitly linked to the original and labelled as AI-modified. It is used as the lead image in the Italian Wikipedia article about Giacomo Di Bartolo and has a clear documentary and educational purpose.
- Please also note that other photographs from the same collection may undergo the same limited tonal correction solely to improve the legibility of the original works. Such files should not be treated as AI-generated artworks or repeatedly nominated for deletion on that basis alone. --~~~~ Neco Verbis (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Lech Wałęsa signing August Agreements with Polish United Workers' Party representatives.webp
Possible Copyright Violation: Copyright Violation of an image that was taken in the Peoples Republic of Poland Zuchuly (talk) 03:42, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment should be added more clarification why this is a copyvio SomeFancyUsername (talk) 04:32, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- The copyright tag looks in order from my perspective as a non-expert in Poland copyright law. Could we please get an explanation as to what the apparent problem is? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Mausoleo familia Ferro Martínez.png
Out of scope: this image was generated or modified using AI. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- This image was modified from one of my own. The original image has been uploaded.Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: does that satisfy your concern? - Jmabel ! talk 02:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Confirmation of Akbar Amirzadeh Irani's background and political positions by Arzhang Davoudi Farsi.webm
This is not personal work. The picture's source is clideo.com Shkuru Afshar (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. I am Akbar Amirzadeh Irani and the uploader HRW4IRAN. This is my original reconstructed illustration, created in 2003 from my personal recollections of Security Ward 209. The Cyrus National Covenant Party website is only the location where my work was later published; it is not a third-party source or creator. The file description already identifies Akbar Amirzadeh Irani as the author and releases the work under CC BY 4.0. I will clarify the source field as “Own work; later published on the official website” to remove any ambiguity. HRW4IRAN (talk) 18:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Reconstructed illustration of Security Ward 209.jpg
This is not personal work. The picture's source is Cyrus National Covenant Party official website. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 04:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. I am Akbar Amirzadeh Irani and the uploader HRW4IRAN. This is my original reconstructed illustration, created in 2003 from my personal recollections of Security Ward 209. The Cyrus National Covenant Party website is only the location where my work was later published; it is not a third-party source or creator. The file description already identifies Akbar Amirzadeh Irani as the author and releases the work under CC BY 4.0. I will clarify the source field as “Own work; later published on the official website” to remove any ambiguity. HRW4IRAN (talk) 18:43, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Average Height of Nepalese Men and Women in every Province.png
Requesting deletion due to fabricated data, misleading sourcing, and extreme bias. The infographic cites a Semantic Scholar URL at the bottom, but the linked academic document does not contain or support adult height data broken down by Nepal's administrative provinces. Furthermore, the map claims a statistically anomalous average male height of 174.7 cm for Madhesh Province, heavily contradicting official WHO and NDHS data (which place national averages around 162-165 cm). The image is an unvetted "own work" upload by a user named "Maithil hoon"—an identity tied to the Madhesh region—strongly suggesting the data was fabricated to artificially inflate regional statistics rather than reflect objective scientific reporting. Prabin357 (talk) 06:33, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:51, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Junger Schornsteinfeger 1946.jpg
Urheberrechtsverletzung - der Künstler Mülhardt ist noch keine 70 Jahre tot GuKa (talk) 07:25, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walerus (talk · contribs)
Querying on scope grounds, as these seem to be reprints from a journal article , the uploader wrote or contributed to. I am NOT querying on copyright grounds, unless authors gave copyright to the journal for their own papers and articles.
- File:M. D. Majewska Actions of Steroids on Neuron Role in Personality Mood Stress and Disease Integrative Psychiatry 1987 5 258-273 reformatted.pdf
- File:M.D. Majewska Actions of Steroids on Neuron, Integrative Psychiatry 5, 258 (1987).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing these files.
- I would like to inform the community that I have already contacted Elsevier and formally requested permission to release the 1987 published version under a free license suitable for Wikimedia Commons. I am currently waiting for Elsevier’s reply.
- This concerns a scientific publication from 1987, printed in a journal (Integrative Psychiatry) that ceased publication in 1988, and written at the Fidia‑Georgetown Institute for Neurosciences, a research institute that no longer exists. Because of this, the article has been inaccessible to the scientific community for decades. Since I am not certain whether the version I have is legally eligible for free release, I prefer to proceed carefully and in full compliance with copyright rules. I kindly ask the community to keep the files online until Elsevier responds, so that the permission request can be completed. If permission is granted, I will immediately provide the required documentation (OTRS/permissions). If permission is denied, I will of course accept deletion. Thank you for your understanding. Walerus (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- I would like to inform the community that I have now contacted both Elsevier and the American Psychological Association (APA) regarding copyright status of this 1987 article:
- Majewska, M. D. (1987). Actions of steroids on neuron: Role in personality, mood, stress, and disease. Integrative Psychiatry, 5(4), 258–273.
- APA PsycNet record: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-00880-001
- The journal Integrative Psychiatry ceased publication in 1988, and its original publisher (Fidia Institute of Neuroscience) no longer exists. The hard‑copy scan shows Elsevier listed as publisher, but Elsevier has confirmed that the rights belong to APA. I have therefore formally submitted a permission request to APA to allow uploading the scanned PDF to Wikimedia Commons under a free license.
- Since the article has no digital version and has been inaccessible for decades, I kindly ask the community to keep the file online until APA responds. If permission is granted, I will immediately provide the required documentation (OTRS/permissions). If permission is denied, I will accept deletion.
- Walerus (talk) 21:02, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
- Subject: Clarification of copyright status – Integrative Psychiatry (1987), Majewska
- Dear Wikimedia Permissions Team,
- I am submitting a clarification regarding the copyright status of the following article, which I request permission to upload to Wikimedia Commons:Majewska, M. D. (1987). Actions of steroids on neuron: Role in personality, mood, stress, and disease. Integrative Psychiatry, 5(4), 258–273.
- Over the past weeks I have conducted an exhaustive investigation into the copyright ownership of the journal Integrative Psychiatry and its publisher. The results are as follows:
- 1. APA is not the rights holder
- APA confirmed in writing that they do not own rights to this article.
- They identified the historical publisher as International Universities Press, Inc. (IUP).
- 2. International Universities Press no longer exists
- IUP ceased operations approximately twenty years ago.
- Its catalog was partially acquired by several publishers (Jason Aronson, Rowman & Littlefield, Taylor & Francis), but none of these publishers inherited the journal Integrative Psychiatry.
- 3. No successor publisher exists
- The journal Integrative Psychiatry has no modern continuation, no successor title, and no entity claiming ownership.
- It is not listed in any active catalog, archive, or rights registry.
- 4. Elsevier is not the rights holder
- Although Elsevier appears on the printed pages of the journal, APA confirmed that Elsevier acted only as a printer/distributor.
- Elsevier does not own rights to this title.
- 5. The work qualifies as an orphaned work
- All attempts to identify a current rights holder have failed.
- The original publisher is defunct, has no successor, and no entity claims ownership of the journal or its contents.
- 6. The author retains copyright
- The author, Maria Dorota Majewska, did not sign any copyright transfer agreement in the 1980s.
- In the absence of a transfer, and with the publisher defunct, the author is the sole copyright holder.
- 7. The author grants permission
- As the copyright holder, I hereby grant permission for the scanned PDF of the article to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for scholarly, non‑commercial use.
- I authorize publication under the license:
- CC BY‑SA 4.0 or CC BY 4.0
- (whichever is preferred by Wikimedia Commons for historical scientific articles).
- If any additional information or documentation is required, I will gladly provide it.
- Kind regards,
- Maria Dorota Majewska
- Author of the 1987 article Walerus (talk) 23:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Withdrawn without prjeudice to another contributor reviewing. The issue was not copyright, but 'scope' which given the explanation above has been demonstrated. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kayleigh McKee
I doubt the licensing because accredited photographers at red carpet events are generally not in the business of giving up their rights anonymously with "CCO [sic.]" licensing; instead, they want to get paid. See also wikt:stanchion.
- File:American voice actress Kayleigh McKee at the red carpet premiere of The Amazing Digital Circus - The Last Act (cropped).jpg
- File:American voice actress Kayleigh McKee at the red carpet premiere of The Amazing Digital Circus - The Last Act.jpg
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:48, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Delete: besides what Jeff says above, the actress herself is credited as author. Sorry, but actresses don't take timer self-portraits in the middle of public events. It is simply not plausible that she is the photographer. - Jmabel ! talk 18:05, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Delete: Hi all, thank you for your opinions on this matter. I agree that the available evidence does not sufficiently establish that the image is the uploader's own work after reviewing both of your comments. I appreciate your input a lot since I'm very new to Commons' policies!- The original source includes the following explanation from the uploader: "I snuck back out to the step and repeat after the event photographer was finished for that express purpose but forgot to upload it haha." This addresses the concern that the image was taken by the official event photographer, but it does not establish who actually operated the camera.
The attribution of "Kayleigh McKee, stanchion" is consistent with the possibility that the uploader created the image herself, suggesting the camera may have been propped on a stanchion rather than held by another photographer, but it is not, on its own, probably sufficient to establish authorship. dvartho ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა ♡ (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep The source has now provided a direct explanation of how the image was created. In response to a question about authorship, she stated: "I ducked out AFTER the pro was done and gone and set a timer on my phone for this so I do believe I have the right thanks." Therefore, I believe everything is now in order for the licensing of this image. dvartho ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა ♡ (talk) 02:47, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- P.S. the treecube user on bluesky is me btw HyperAnd [talk] 09:47, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Now there is more evidence that the photo was taken by the actress including a screenshot with the photo metadata: https://bsky.app/profile/ghaspey.bsky.social/post/3mr4eulavdc2d. The photo was taken on a Galaxy S24 Ultra. Metadata from the professional photographer was also posted, showing the professional photos were taken on a Canon EOS 5D Mark III: https://bsky.app/profile/ghaspey.bsky.social/post/3mr4fbsks3c2d. I think this further corroborates the existing evidence for the stated authorship and addresses the original nominating concern. dvartho ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა ♡ (talk) 03:47, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- P.S. the treecube user on bluesky is me btw HyperAnd [talk] 09:47, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, I just seen and read her post, while she makes the claims that she took the photograph herself it doesn't appear she understands w:Wikipedia:A picture of you. Conditional
Keep if there is a proper license for the image. Issac I Navarro (talk) 08:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, I just seen and read her post, while she makes the claims that she took the photograph herself it doesn't appear she understands w:Wikipedia:A picture of you. Conditional
- I reviewed all of the above. According to the details tab in Windows Explorer 10, neither the upload here nor the reduced size https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:enk52scwo3v2kzncnntuq6tt/bafkreidtl4nwn4wtmfbwvzik7eqtwsr2utkgbub77lb42okfaja6ml377q as displayed by https://bsky.app/profile/ghaspey.bsky.social/post/3mqgnkoermk23 reveals sufficient camera model or timer metadata to confirm what dvartho posted. Am I missing something? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., in this post https://bsky.app/profile/ghaspey.bsky.social/post/3mr4fbsks3c2d she shows a screenshot of the image: https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:enk52scwo3v2kzncnntuq6tt/bafkreiepvqas6jfdrapebvgddxu2xz37bq3zj7z5jaxjlnp57c2h4v6cy4 Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I am still trying to understand how a 72 dpi photo is considered higher quality. I have no issues with my photo being replaced by a red carpet photo. But this is not a higher quality photo by most standards I know. But apparently she wants it. Npgeek73 (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- I left a message over at en:Talk:Kayleigh McKee#Updated Picture, to help keep this DR on topic. Issac I Navarro (talk) 05:53, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
- I am still trying to understand how a 72 dpi photo is considered higher quality. I have no issues with my photo being replaced by a red carpet photo. But this is not a higher quality photo by most standards I know. But apparently she wants it. Npgeek73 (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., in this post https://bsky.app/profile/ghaspey.bsky.social/post/3mr4fbsks3c2d she shows a screenshot of the image: https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:enk52scwo3v2kzncnntuq6tt/bafkreiepvqas6jfdrapebvgddxu2xz37bq3zj7z5jaxjlnp57c2h4v6cy4 Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Yogan.jpg
Possible copyvio: Picture of a band, from a band, but umploaded by someone else, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:04, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Henpecked Hoboes- George and Junior Poster (MGM, 1946).jpg
This file was initially tagged by Go D. Usopp as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and to check whether original US copyright might already be gone. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Túrelio copyright registered in 1946. copyright renewed in 1973. File also had an incorrect CC license. Obvious copyvio. Go D. Usopp (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Túrelio Is this clear for deletion? Go D. Usopp (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment The renewal is for the motion picture, but the DR is for a poster. They are two different publications. See for example the abundance in Commons of trailers were the movie was copyrighted but not the trailer. Günther Frager (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager even if the poster has its copyright, George and Junior are still copyrighted and trademarked by Turner Entertainment Co. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Go D. Usopp: Trademarks are not copyrights. That the character is copyright only means you cannot make derivative works based on the character. The artwork here is not copyrighted and can be uploaded. Günther Frager (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager Anything with Bugs Bunny and other post-1930 copyrighted characters cannot be uploaded here per previous deletion requests. The poster may be PD, but it is still restricted by the characters on it. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep per @Günther Frager, "The artwork here is not copyrighted and can be uploaded." as well as pointing out that the two links provided are for films, not this poster. -- Ooligan (talk) 05:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Ooligan It is still a derivative work of a copyrighted film and its still-copyrighted characters. The file was originally uploaded with an incorrect license that claims to be owned by the uploader. Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Kaldari any thoughts, since you deleted similar images? Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Go D. Usopp,
- What are the names of these two characters?
- What years were they copyrighted? -- Ooligan (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Ooligan per Commons:Character copyrights, all appearances of a fictional character are in copyright as long as their first appearance is in copyright. George and Junior's first cartoon is Henpecked Hoboes, and I listed that film's copyright registration and renewal on my first reply here. Go D. Usopp (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Ooligan It is still a derivative work of a copyrighted film and its still-copyrighted characters. The file was originally uploaded with an incorrect license that claims to be owned by the uploader. Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager Anything with Bugs Bunny and other post-1930 copyrighted characters cannot be uploaded here per previous deletion requests. The poster may be PD, but it is still restricted by the characters on it. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Go D. Usopp: Trademarks are not copyrights. That the character is copyright only means you cannot make derivative works based on the character. The artwork here is not copyrighted and can be uploaded. Günther Frager (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Günther Frager even if the poster has its copyright, George and Junior are still copyrighted and trademarked by Turner Entertainment Co. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Maïté.png
Possivle copyvio: Seems like an old photo, not from 2019, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:45, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Fredie-Marche-2026.jpg
Personal picture, Possible self-promotion CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:47, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Files in Category:Baghdad Convention Center
This is a copyrighted work of architecture, being completed in 1982 and authored by Finnish architects w:en:Kaija Siren and w:en:Heikki Siren. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in Iraq, these commercially licensed images infringe the posthumous copyrights of the aforementioned deceased architects.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:54, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/intitle:/DPLA - 77a558ad91b360a4dea98123cc17302a/ filetype:pdf
Duplicate for pages present in File:Report of Task Force Topsy - DPLA - 77a558ad91b360a4dea98123cc17302a (page 1).pdf
- File:Report of Task Force Topsy - DPLA - 77a558ad91b360a4dea98123cc17302a (page 5).pdf
- File:Report of Task Force Topsy - DPLA - 77a558ad91b360a4dea98123cc17302a (page 2).pdf
- File:Report of Task Force Topsy - DPLA - 77a558ad91b360a4dea98123cc17302a (page 3).pdf
- File:Report of Task Force Topsy - DPLA - 77a558ad91b360a4dea98123cc17302a (page 4).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:56, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Files in Category:DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c
Duplicative of File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 16).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 17).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 18).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 19).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 20).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 21).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 22).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 23).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 24).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 25).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 26).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 27).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 28).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 29).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 30).pdf
- File:Brazil's Roman Catholic Church - DPLA - 953939a69a9d0dc41a98a7a129da909c (page 31).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Ruslan Krasnov's selfie with his comrade-in-arms and equipment.jpg
Title of image is “Ruslan_Krasnov's_selfie” alas creator claim Hromadska Syla (“public organisation“) . Doubtful that licensing is authoriszed, thus likely copyvio. Zenwort (talk) 12:32, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:UA 72nd brigade aerial recon 03.jpg
Tagged {{mil.gov.ua}}, alas given source is a facebook page (no longer available). Doubtful attribution, esp. in the light of similar cases cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 7 Zenwort (talk) 12:36, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:UA TDF practicing AA defence 02.jpg
Tagged {{mil.gov.ua}}, alas given source is a facebook page (no longer available). Doubtful attribution, esp. in the light of similar cases cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 7 Zenwort (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Well, this case is different, because the TDF's Facebook page explicitly states "Весь контент доступний за ліцензією Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationall license, якщо не зазначено інше" ("All the content is available under ... license, unless otherwise specified"). The page and the post are available now. So if I'm not missing anything, this particular image should be kept. RajatonRakkaus (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:UA 72nd brigade aerial recon 02.jpg
Tagged {{mil.gov.ua}}, alas given source is a facebook page (no longer available). Doubtful attribution, esp. in the light of similar cases cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 7 Zenwort (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Fenomenología del espíritu. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel; Traducción... por X. Zubiri.pdf
I assume the BNE understands copyrights, but a 1935 work by an author who died in 1983 might not be out of copyright.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Kurdish Wikimedians User Group.png
صورة مولدة بالذكاء الاصطناعي (AI) وهناك نسخة بديلة عنه مصممة يدوياً file:Wikimedia Kurdistan logo en2.svg Mohammed Qays 🗣 13:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:A book of discoveries (IA bookofdiscoverie00maserich).pdf
London Edition, Maefield died in 1967 -PD US but not PD-UK ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:31, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- 2037 seems the undelete date based on the poet's death year. Note that typographical copyright lasts only 25 years, so a book first published in the US and republished in the UK would have that limitation. Note that this book was first published in 1910, however it's the much later date of death that counts for the calculation. Fæ (talk) 17:57, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Thugs with Dirty Mugs title card.png
Invalid public domain licence tag. I believe that the United Artists (UA) (a successor to the Associated Artists Productions (AAP)) renewed the original copyright for the short in 1967 (renewal registration identifier: R408958), so it won't enter the public domain soon for 95 years until the first day of January 2035.
Here are these two relevant snippets of record entries:
- Thugs with dirty mugs. © May 6, 1939; 2 c. and descr. May 11; M 3977; Vitaphone corp., New York. 3710 - Referenced from the US Library of Congress (LC) - Catalog of Copyright Entries 1939: Dramatic Compositions and Motion Pictures (Part 1, Group 3).
- THUGS WITH DIRTY MUGS, a motion picture in one reel by Vitaphone Corp. © 6May39; MP9377. United Artists Television, Inc. (PWH); 3May67; R408958. - Referenced from the US Library of Congress (LC) - Catalog of Copyright Entries 1967: Motion Pictures and Filmstrips (Parts 12-13).
HarvettFox96 (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Question And what about threshold of originality?- HarvettFox96 (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I believe it is trivial enough. We have some logos in the bottom corners but they are small and DM could be applied. --rubin16 (talk) 18:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Thugs with Dirty Mugs title card.png
Modified version of a copyrighted screenshot () from a Blue Ribbon reissue, you can still see the ribbon drawing. Anyhow, the image is useless as even the font is generic and used for other cartoons (examples). OswaldLR (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Kept: copyrighted versión deleted. --Bedivere (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
File:Thugs with Dirty Mugs title card.png
Original uploader failed to notice the faint Blue Ribbon in the background as well as two non-simple logos in the bottom left and right corners. Film is still copyrighted. PD-trivial tag is inaccurate. Go D. Usopp (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Delete for the copyright violation. See also User_talk:Yann/archives_63#Copyright_violations. Andrek02 (talk) 09:14, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Albacinema Logo.png
Possible copyvio: Logo above threshold of originality, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Trần Vĩnh Ngọc.png
Claimed as "the work of a computer algorithm or artificial intelligence"; this fails COM:AIIP whether that means fully generated, or edited from an unspecified source image. (It looks like the latter.) Belbury (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nishanth-Apitoria (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep. Notable pharmaceutical company and subsidiary thereof (en:Aurobindo Pharma). IronGargoyle (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Map of railways in Cologne (2025-08).jpg
copyrighted plan Krd 16:46, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep
- The correct word in English is map.
- KVB does not claim copyright (Urheberrecht; ); Deutsche Bahn only claims the copyright on website ().
- See COM:TOO. I consider that the design is too simple, therefore it is ineligible on copyright.
- Copyright never protects fact. "The standard for deciding whether a work can gain copyright protection is its originality rather than its creator’s effort." (from Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) / online ).
- Kaap bij Sneeuw (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- For the case in German law, see . Kaap bij Sneeuw (talk) 17:49, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Disc golf course map in San Diego - Hole 2 In memory of Kenneth Lindner.jpg
copyrighted map Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Un nuevo country- La Lagunita Country Club..jpg
Photograph of other images Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Royal Golf Club Oudenaarde 40.jpg
Photograph of a map Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Flat Eric pose 2.jpg
The photographer uploaded this file to Flickr with a CC license. abbedabbtalk 17:41, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Abbedabb: - It should be made clearer that this was originally tagged as a speed delete copyvio by myself ("Derivative work of copyrighted material. Most likely COM:TOY applies here, i.e. derivative copyvio.") which you converted to this deletion request because "This file does not qualify for speedy-deletion and a regular deletion request will be started."
- In that context, I assume that your comment is an argument in favour of "keep"?
- If so, it has no bearing on the matter since no-one was disputing that it had been uploaded to Flicker under CC, and the actual reason given for deletion was that it violated COM:TOY.
- It's a good image, and if you can come up with a legitimate argument for keeping it, or why I was mistaken, I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but I don't see any of that at present. Ubcule (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
- For reference, the following discussions relate to the same set of speedy-delete nominations for images in Category:Flat Eric.
- Ubcule (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Back of a golfclub.jpg
No use for this Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Milwaukee-art institute nuilding Jefferson St.jpg
Unclear about the actual date of the photograph Bubudu57 (talk) 17:57, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Elastigirl Cosplay By tephie cos HD Powerful.jpg
{{speedydelete|Not educationally useful}} Mohammad ebz (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep The work is already in use. After all, it is a cosplay that is displaying a specific type of clothing and social behavior. Knight U (talk) 07:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
File:2025-01-08 Palisades fire smoke from beach bike path (Wednesday, around noon) 02.jpg
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:8195001064568694401 2025 southern California wildfire smoke over Santa Monica beach 02.jpg
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:8195001064568694401 2025 southern California wildfire smoke over Santa Monica beach 01.jpg
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana train station
- File:Concrete ribs in a facade (Unsplash).jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia - AV Mediopadana 2018-07-19 16.25.57.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.01.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.04.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.05.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.06.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.08.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.10.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.13.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.14.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.17.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.20.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.21.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.23.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.24.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.25.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.26.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.28.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.30.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.32.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.34.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station in 2026.35.jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana, Italy (Unsplash).jpg
- File:Reggio Emilia Stazione AV (34719421076).jpg
- File:Stazione di Calatrava (fianco).jpg
- File:Stazione di Calatrava (fronte).jpg
- File:Stazione Mediopadana alta velocità Reggio Emilia (15918560268).jpg
- File:TPER ATR.220.026 presso Reggio Emilia Mediopadana.jpg
- File:Reggio Mediopadana railway station.jpg
All these images depict the en:Reggio Emilia AV Mediopadana railway station, which is a copyrighted architecture by the living architect en:Santiago Calatrava, completed in 2013. No FOP in Italy, it is not PD-ItalyGov either since it wasn't commissoned by the Municipality of Reggio Emilia alone, but also by TAV S.p.A., a private company (although publicly owned, see here and here). It is one of the very few cases in which copyright on architectural works in Italy is actually enforced (see here), at least for commercial purposes, so these images really can't stay here on commons (they are proably acceptable for en.wiki and other fair-use projects). I've already left out the images in the category that IMHO fall under de minimis or show parts of the building which, by themselves, are below the high Italian ToO. --Friniate (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Abstract William Afton face.png
I don't think this is below the threshold of originality. It's 8-bit art, but it still has clear artistic intent and direction. I don't think it qualifies as "abstract". ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Richard 'Dick' Burton commemoration at Sale Golf Club.jpg
Photograph of other images Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Wappenschild mit Rauten und Ähren.png
Offenbar frei erfunden, out of scope GerritR (talk) 19:06, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:A cartoon golf and dinosaur club.jpg
Commons is not your free personal web COM:HOST. "Artwork" is lacking COM:EDUSE Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Carmen Geutjes 2019 (cropped).png
There is reason to believe the pictured underaged person did never consent to have her picture taken and/or published. https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carmen_Geutjes&diff=268734276&oldid=268734163 Berghest (talk) 19:46, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Info The person's article, the only page to use the picture (and the only article it could reasonably be used in) has been deleted in de:wp .-Berghest (talk) 09:08, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Keep. File is still in use on Wikidata and the nominator is incorrect. She also has an article on English Wikipedia. No issues with consent as she is clearly on stage performing. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
File:MP original trailer 2.png
This file was initially tagged by Based5290 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: End of trailer shows very clear valid copyright notice for Walt Disney Productions
Converted to regular DR to allow for a thorough discussion, as per User talk:Túrelio#File:MP original trailer 2.png. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Here is a summary of the issue with this deletion: this is a screenshot of Mary Poppins' original movie trailer. The current justification for eligibility applied to all the others screenshots of the same movie - which were uploaded in 2008 and have never been questioned since - is based on the assertion that « trailers older than 28 years are in the Public Domain because they were never separately copyrighted ».
- If this licence is valid, this file should not be removed. Otherwise, the deletion must be applied to all the trailer's screenshots covered by the same licence, not only for Mary Poppins, but across the entire project. The project will also need to explain why this justification was accepted for so long before carrying out a thorough clean-up.
- It should be noted however that US courts have often permitted the use of still images under fair use for film analyses or press articles – which is precisely in line with Wikipedia’s encyclopaedic purpose. It might therefore be worth considering transferring them to local wikis until Commons policy accepts them. Regards, Voxhominis (talk) 07:31, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I am equally confounded as to why all these Mary Poppins trailer screenshots were uploaded as {{PD-US-no notice}} when every contemporary trailer I can find seems to have a clear copyright notice at the end of the trailer. That being said, I can't seem to find File:Mary Poppins11.jpg in the trailers. Maybe there is an original trailer which actually did lack notice? Unless this trailer can be located, though, we will likely just have to delete all the trailer screenshots per COM:PCP. Based5290 (talk) 06:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
File:PALFINGER Logo.jpg
Logo superseded by SVG version: File:Palfinger logo.svg Btrs (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Spain national football team crest 2026 champions.png
Logo of a copyrighted organization. Its should be in public domain, but there are costal arms in the middle of the logo, so this file is not acceptable. It should be transferred in other local projects. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Delete and replace it with local SVG files. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 22:52, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- how do I change it w a svg file? This is my first time uploading a pic ~2026-40459-40 (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Please consult Help:SVG, this help page can help you. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 23:25, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- The file has already been replaced by a fair use logo at the English Wikipedia page of the Spanish national team. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 11:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- But it can have a rendition for Commons purposes, as the part that is above the threshold of originality is a rendition of Spanish insignia. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- The file has already been replaced by a fair use logo at the English Wikipedia page of the Spanish national team. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 11:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Please consult Help:SVG, this help page can help you. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 23:25, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- how do I change it w a svg file? This is my first time uploading a pic ~2026-40459-40 (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- + File:Spain national football team crest 2026.jpg
- + File:Spain national football team crest 2026 ver.svg
- Ђидо (talk) 23:58, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe it can be recreated using this file as a reference, for projects that don't allow fair use (such as Spanish Wikipedia) or contexts where fair use is not permitted (such as the youth national football teams). You can request it at the graphics lab illustration workshop if you so wish. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 20:33, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment. It is worth considering that this is just the Spanish coat of arms from an organization which originated in 1909. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- There is a recreation of the England national football team logo also on Commons. The Spain national football team logo can be recreated using a free rendition of the coat of arms for Commons purposes, as the rest of the logo is below the threshold of originality. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Logotipo Selección de España de fútbol - 2026.png
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spain national football team crest 2026 champions.png, the logo is not admissible. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 22:52, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Зоран_Пејашиновић,_2023.jpg
Unlikely that uploader, which uses same name as a subject of photography, is also the author or the photo. Another file uploaded by user has exactly same setting, and is copyrighted. Ђидо (talk) 05:49, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
File:Зоран Пејашиновић, 2023.jpg
Nemam autorsko pravo na sliku Зоран Пејашиновић 2 (talk) 10:57, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)