Wikimore

5 April 2026

7 April 2026

Deletion requests on 6 April 2026

April 6

File:Cambodian MFAIC arms.png

Does this really fall under "other instructed circulars issued by state organizations"? TansoShoshen (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes it is legit! It is formal issuance under , so, yes it may be considered as an official instruction Hwi.padam (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Alternatively, it can be interpreted as direct extraction from documents like this one, even as part of the seal, which is unlikely to be copyrighted due to it being explicitly registered by state authorities and part of the official documentation (either as the header logo or the seal). TL;DR this one can be understood as an official circular and formal issuance of guidance because it is the official website, and it can also be known as graphical extraction from multiple public document. Hwi.padam (talk) 01:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Hwi.padam In that 1st regard, the official portraits of HM Sihanouk, Sihamoni, and the Queen Mother have been deleted time and time again because consensus states that photos and lots of other graphical media weren't covered.

The thing about the document though, interesting, I'll give it that. I'll reserve judgement until we get more opinions. TansoShoshen (talk) 02:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Well yes, I have to agree that it's kinda on the borderline. If the portraits were not accepted, interpreting the arms as extraction from official document should be considered, even though I'm not sure how they interpret it in Cambodia. Hwi.padam (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Helen Whitener Bioographical.jpg

I hate to do this, but this is not a work of the federal government. It's a work of Washington State, and SCOWA has not stated a copyright policy to my knowledge. The default for Washington agencies is that it is copyrighted. Lethargilistic (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:WikiRPG OST 1 - Aspen.wav

Uploaded a long time ago, unused, and unlikely to be useful to anyone LOOKSQUARE (talk) 02:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:7OQFvuRSCKGNL6m3v1mI--1--cpz6s.jpg

AI slop, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Skelton card 1948.jpg

Photo is not legitimate. RaduFerenczy (talk) 02:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep For all we know, you're not legitimate. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Here is the address side of this postcard. --sk (talk) 10:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Afrodita.lucilai.jpg

AI slop, we have actual pictures of Aphrodite and this looks like none of them. Dronebogus (talk) 02:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep currently in use and removal is to be discussed by/at/with the respective site contributors, not here. There is no need to get such going as there is no need to remove this. we have actual pictures of Aphrodite absurd statement this looks like none of them the image should be based on and look like the sculptures and contemporary art of Aphrodite I think so probably the file shouldn't be used or be improved first. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Aphrodite was an important figure in Mediterranean religion, and thereafter continued to play roles in the art of Christian Europe (variously as a cautionary exemplar of pagan lasciviousness, allegorical or symbolic figure, allusion to the continent’s Classical heritage, and a simple provider of eroticism). This image bears no resemblance to any of these depictions and hence lacks educational value. It can’t even be used to show modern engagement with old themes, because it wasn’t the product of human intelligence. Also, what does “lucilai” mean? ManuelKomnenos (talk) 01:56, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:AI protest image 3.jpg

Unused AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 02:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:7'adar-AI.jpg

Useless AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 02:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete not useful. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibirapuera (talk · contribs)

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

]

(talk The artist used filters to emphasize the pleasure,for the audience to have access at the information - image The subject "Night Exercise" is a positive message and good habit. message is clear I believe Wikipédia have a clever audience... My suggestion is that you review your point (talk

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 23:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ibirapuera (talk · contribs)

AI slop, OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment, File:1 sinapse orgasmo.jpg is currently COM:INUSE in multiple wikis. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It can be kept as it seems to illustrate the artist’s work. Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:'Polite Society' utopian outdoor dining in nature.jpg

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment I tend to agree. What is the educational purpose of this that would not be better served by a photo or painting? - Jmabel ! talk 05:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The question is rather meaningless given that no painting that has a free-license exists on Commons afaik. If it exists, a high-resolution realistic image is to many or in many cases still preferred even if it was. Prototyperspective (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep subjective slightly-uncivil unconstructive POV derogatory term is not a valid deletion rationale. Not the most useful of picture but still could be the only high-res image of outdoor community dining on a table (rather than a blanket). Prototyperspective (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Because that’s an important topic that needs to be illustrated? Dronebogus (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not super important. I thought it's a concept worth illustrating as being outdoors as well as social interaction are both healthy and it's super rare to see what's in the pic nowadays and notably there is no other free artistic illustration of it afaik (and no photo either but a photo is not always preferred). Prototyperspective (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Why do you always try to find a hypothetical use for [insert random low quality AI image] that requires the intersection of like six categories in a Venn diagram? It reminds me of how Strong Bad once said you can’t just make up some random crap no-one else will ever do and call it a world record. Dronebogus (talk) 22:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It's a very reasonable very plausible usefulness case. It's more useful than about 80% of files on Commons I'd say if just considering that explanation but not the implementation. Well-being of humans doesn't seem to matter to you if you think that's an a strange explanation. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

We’re not exactly lacking in images of social interaction or people outdoors. Dronebogus (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Akerbeltz (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

Terrible looking slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Aideko (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

Terrible looking slop Dronebogus (talk) 02:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Aire-gaizto (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

Terrible looking AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

In use and accepted by the community. -Theklan (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It doesn’t appear to be in use in mainspace Dronebogus (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete Only used in userspace and thus cannot benefit from COM:INUSE. EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 22:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:AI Painted Art of Northern Norway.webp

AI slop, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:AI generated Logo experiment 18.jpg

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete not useful and low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:AI generated Logo experiment (cropped with transparent background).png

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:A.I. art depicting desertification.png

AI slop, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2WORLDS.jpg

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 02:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2582920003 of a montain of ice concept art matte painting HQ 4k.png

AI slop, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:A Loba Branca do Barbanza.jpg

AI slop, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete low quality, not useful. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:22, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:A Lunferna da fraga de Rendo, a caron do Pazo de Oca.jpg

AI slop, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 02:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Midjourney - An official and his wives at dinner.jpg

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:On stage Becky Shaw by Marc J. Franklin.jpg

Not CC/public domain ~2026-21186-92 (talk) 02:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Amilamia (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep – this should be discussed at where it's used, not here. Come here if it has been discussed and got removed. Or just live with there being some very low-quality files that one can't delete. This is just an agreeable immediate case. It's obviously of low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Amalur (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki and oc-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Artai - IA Midjourney versión 1.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete terrible quality, not useful. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Atarrabi by Midjourney

AI slop, OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 02:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep currently in use and removal is to be discussed by/at/with the respective site contributors, not here. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Etsai (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png is not in use Dronebogus (talk) 17:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, all images, except File:Etsai (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png, are currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki and other wikis. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis with foreskin.jpg

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Keep If all penises were identical, I would agree we have too many, but they all look different, and we need a variety of sizes/colors/shapes/ethnicities to avoid selection bias. --RAN (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment This image is of only moderate interest. I'm completely content to leave it to the discretion of an admin whether the category of penises should include this photo or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:18, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ per @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). Brianjd (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

I am not so sure now: this is low resolution compared to Pene maschile .jpg, and even in that image, the penis itself seems to be a bit out of focus. Brianjd (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Keep it’s something different I guess Dronebogus (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Penis with foreskin.jpg

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 19:08, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete, per nom. This image is not that different then what is currently on Commons. Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:52, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Asia-zuppina.jpg

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Belagile by Midjourney

Terrible quality AI slop.

Dronebogus (talk) 02:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep All of those are in use, and accepted by the community. -Theklan (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: These supposedly represent something called a “Belagile”, yet the images are all both incomprehensible and totally different. How is this educational? Dronebogus (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Just being. Are you an expert on Basque Mythology? Can you tell how a Belagile should be illustrated? Theklan (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

If you seemingly can’t why are you attempting to “illustrate” it? Dronebogus (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

So your only argument is that you don't like it? That's not a valid reason for deletion. Theklan (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

That wasn’t what I was arguing at all. You can’t even provide a coherent description of what this entity is. Dronebogus (talk) 16:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

The entity is eu:Belagile Theklan (talk) 07:34, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep File:Belagile (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png and File:Sorsain (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png, both are currently COM:INUSE in multiple wikis. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Basque mythology by Midjourney

Terrible quality AI slop. Many are in use but virtually all of them are too abysmal to illustrate anything, consisting of unrecognizable nonsense imagery.

Dronebogus (talk) 02:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep Nearly all of those are in use, and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like them is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: Why do you consider these acceptable illustrations of Euskal mythology? They literally look like nothing in most cases and the few that are recognizable are exceptionally malformed and misgenerated. And why do popular characters with good quality images (like Olentzero) need terrible quality AI representations that look nothing like them? Dronebogus (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Is not I consider those acceptable illustrations, is that the Basque Community has accepted it, even voting to keep those as valid. The fact that you don't like them is not a valid reason for deletion. Theklan (talk) 19:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Are you referring to the Wikipedia community or are you saying the entire Basque Autonomous Community approved these files? Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep currently in use and removal is to be discussed by/at/with the respective site contributors, not here. Dronebogus doesn't seem to be able to learn COM:INUSE and continues wasting people's time by nominating files that are used out of the millions of files on Commons. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Note that many of these are suitable to be renominated once not in use anymore due to being low-quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

e.g. File:Itsas lamina (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png is of low-quality and best removed from use and deleted. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The image is in use, and accepted by the community. It is clearly stated that this is an AI creation of a mythological being. Theklan (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

this is what the character is supposed to look like. How is the AI version in any way accurate or acceptable? My best guess from that image was that she was a mermaid! Dronebogus (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Then the AI is not so sloppy, because it is a kind of mermaid. Theklan (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep those that are COM:INUSE, I haven't checked them all, but those I have checked are currently in-use in multiple wikis. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep I personally worked on the drawing (Zaldi), including cutting off the head. The drawin is used to accompany legends, and appears in several wikis. Thank you. -- Zorion^eko 20:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment Please, @Dronebogus: , don't remove the images from other places while the discussion is open. That removal distorts the use data of the files discussed. -Theklan (talk) 16:04, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

I removed them from Wikidata in my capacity as a long-term, regular Wikidata editor because they were unusably terrible. In fact I would remove them from the other wikis too if I spoke their respective languages, which I don’t. Dronebogus (talk) 16:42, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Both Catalan and Basque Wikipedia, which are using these images, rely on Wikidata to load the images in their templates. As these are in use via Wikidata, removing them distorts this discussion. Theklan (talk) 07:22, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

That is their problem, not Wikidata’s. If you rely on Wikidata to fill out your infoboxes you are inherently at the mercy of independent local decisions on Wikidata. Wikidata does not, to my knowledge, have an INUSE equivalent that makes it a slave to other projects’ decisions. Dronebogus (talk) 03:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Basajaun by Midjourney

Terrible quality AI slop.

Dronebogus (talk) 02:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep Both of them are in use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like them is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, both images are currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Beleko (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

Terrible quality AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: please explain what this image even is Dronebogus (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Beleko, a mythological being. Theklan (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

What is a Beleko? What are its attributes? What does it do? Because all those things should be evident from the picture but aren’t. Dronebogus (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

eu:Beleko Theklan (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teodosio eta dragoia1.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep currently in use and removal is to be discussed by/at/with the respective site contributors, not here. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teodosio eta dragoia2.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No it isn’t. It’s in use on a talk page. COM:INUSE doesn’t apply Dronebogus (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep currently in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Mairu by Midjourney

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything

Dronebogus (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, both images are currently COM:INUSE in ca-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep in use but should not be in use due to terrible quality. Simply please stop wasting people's time. If you can and are motivated make a better alternative, go for it. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Sorgin by Midjourney

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything

Dronebogus (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: explain how this actually represents the subject Dronebogus (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

How does it represent a mythological being that is told to dance in the night with horned rams? Theklan (talk) 19:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I don’t know, you uploaded it. Dronebogus (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Indeed. And the community has adopted it, even if you delete them from Wikidata. Theklan (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep currently in use despite of what seems to be very low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep File:Sorgin (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Ireltxu by Midjourney

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything

Dronebogus (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: the first is unused and of exceptionally poor quality Dronebogus (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep File:Ireltxu (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Intxisua (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything Dronebogus (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: this apparently shows someone dressed as an Intxisua. How is that remotely consistent with this depiction? Dronebogus (talk) 17:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It depicts an intxisu. That's the point. Theklan (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Ihizi by Midjourney

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything

Dronebogus (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: What does this even represent? The first doesn’t look like anything other than a flaming Rorschach inkblot, the second is some kind of flying metallic bull. Dronebogus (talk) 16:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It represents Ihizi. Theklan (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, both images are currently COM:INUSE in eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Inguma (Midjourney v5).png

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything Dronebogus (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No it isn’t. It’s in use on a talk page. COM:INUSE doesn’t apply Dronebogus (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ilaski v5.png

AI slop, too low quality to illustrate anything Dronebogus (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No it isn’t. Dronebogus (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teodosio penitentzian1.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No it isn’t. It’s in use on a talk page. COM:INUSE doesn’t apply Dronebogus (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teodosio penitentzian2.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No it isn’t. It’s in use on a talk page. COM:INUSE doesn’t apply Dronebogus (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teodosio penitentzian3.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No it isn’t. It’s in use on a talk page. COM:INUSE doesn’t apply Dronebogus (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Patxi Errementaria by Midjourney

Unusably poor AI slop.

Dronebogus (talk) 02:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: what is this? What does it represent? This is not a technical subject, I should be able to understand at a glance. In that aspect it is a failure. Dronebogus (talk) 15:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It represents Patxi Errementaria. Theklan (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

And what is a Patxi Errementaria? That’s like showing you a drawing of a squiggly line and saying it’s a zergamapus. You have to explain what that is first. Dronebogus (talk) 22:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

eu:Patxi Errementaria Theklan (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

I don’t speak Euskara Dronebogus (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Not relevant for a deletion request, as Commons serves more communities and languages. Theklan (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, both images are currently COM:INUSE in wikidata. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete the first if it remains out of use. Terrible quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Mamarro (euskal mitologia) - Midjourney AI bertsioa.png

Unusably poor AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 02:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep In use and accepted by the community. The fact that you don't like it is not a valid reason for deletion. -Theklan (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Theklan: even compared to other AI generated renditions of this being it is absolutely abysmal. I don’t know who “accepted” this but they’re wrong. Dronebogus (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Are you some kind of expert on Basque Mythology? Can you explain how they are wrong? Theklan (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Are you some kind of expert who can explain how they’re right? Apparently this is some kind of bug spirit? At most I could infer it was vaguely insectoid, but an image should inform the ignorant, not require preexisting knowledge of the subject to know what it is. Dronebogus (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

eu:Mamarro Theklan (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is currently COM:INUSE in ca-wiki and eu-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hammerfest, fontana della famiglia del pescatore in attesa, di Ørnulf Bast, 1970 ca. 01.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1970 by Ørnulf Bast (1907–1974). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2045 A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hammerfest, fontana della famiglia del pescatore in attesa, di Ørnulf Bast, 1970 ca. 02.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1970 by Ørnulf Bast (1907–1974). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2045 A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hammerfest, fontana della famiglia del pescatore in attesa, di Ørnulf Bast, 1970 ca. 03.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1970 by Ørnulf Bast (1907–1974). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2045 A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hammerfest, fontana della famiglia del pescatore in attesa, di Ørnulf Bast, 1970 ca. 04.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1970 by Ørnulf Bast (1907–1974). There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2045 A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gwinnett.png

COM:GCSD#G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content) Spamavalanche (talk) 03:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Forest defense is national defense, how to prevent forest fires.jpg

Duplicate - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22Forest_Defense_is_National_Defense%22_-_NARA_-_513638.tif UnifiedFunctionality (talk) 03:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:CIA World Factbook 2021 physical world map.svg

This file is outdated and is not being used in any substantial way. A newer version of this file can be found at File:Map_of_the_world_by_the_US_Gov_as_of_2016.svg Connor Irwin (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep – this map is from 2021, so it's actually more up-to-date than Map of the world by the US Gov as of 2016.svg, even if the formatting isn't as good. The only reason we use the 2016 version on Wikipedia is that some editors disagreed with changes to US foreign policy in 2021. Generally speaking, I think it's conceivable that some will find this file useful, even in the presence of the new 2016 version. The fact that it's not currently used in any sister projects isn't by itself a reason for deletion. Justinkunimune (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lê Minh Hưng.png

no this is not the uploader's "own work" Hwi.padam (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lê Minh Hưng 2026.jpg

no this is not the uploader's "own work". obvious copyright violation Hwi.padam (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:BDSM Ball Gag.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic encyclopedic use. There are better quality images on this subject Issac I Navarro (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep COM:INUSE within commons; quality is not unusably poor Dronebogus (talk) 18:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Asavikin (talk · contribs)

All images avaialable on different copyrighted websites. No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep the photos have metadata, so they very likely own works SomeFancyUsername (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Portogallo2007 (1667508615).jpg

duplicated from File:Evora-Street4.jpg DiogoBaptista (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep As uploader. File:Evora-Street4.jpg has "768 × 1 024 píxeis", while File:Portogallo2007 (1667508615).jpg has "736 × 3 648 píxeis", so the one that should be deleted is File:Evora-Street4.jpg, not File:Portogallo2007 (1667508615).jpg- Tm (talk) 17:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2005 New South Wales registration plate T♦002 taxi.jpg

Poor quality image superseded by this image. LuvsMG481 (talk) 07:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The uploader, EurovisionNim, is said to be a previous account of LuvsMG481. Note that LuvsMG481 recently asked me to "nuke all their uploads", so deleting files because they uploaded something better might not be clever. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:52, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ares Aresovič.jpg

selfpromo Kusurija (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

… and the corresponding page was already deleted. --Mykhal (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

User talk:Cosimo ugolini

useless and not necessary Cosimo ugolini (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

User talk:Cosimo ugolini

useless and not necessary Cosimo ugolini (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2022-Gustavo-Scarpa-2022.png

Campos 'autoria' e 'fonte' preenchidos incorretamente, não é possível ter certeza sobre o licenciamento da imagem. MarceloHXHX (talk) 08:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Inthronisation von Donald Trump 2025-04-05.png

Artwork without obvious educational value, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills Cagliost (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

See Commons:Project scope: "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose", "Artwork without obvious educational value, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills". Cagliost (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per COM:AIIP. EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete Low quality AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 17:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per COM:AIIP Eiim (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lanthanolania.jpg

False authorship and license. The photo was originally uploaded to the Russian Wikipedia as non-free in 2014 - see ru:Файл:Лантанолания.jpg. The file in the Russian Wikipedia has a source that contains the image. GAndy (talk) 09:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I agree that the "own work" claim is false, but it says that it was a cross-wiki upload from en-wiki, so I assume this was a mistake on the behalf of the uploader @GleisReis: when they uploaded the image from en-wiki, where it may have been correctly uploaded under a valid license (unfortunately this information is erased when the image is transferred to Commons). The image looks to me like it is one drawn by prolific paleoartist Dmitry Bogdanov @ДиБгд: , who has freely licensed many of his works to Commons, so perhaps they would be able to comment whether or not they are the creator of the image, and if it was ever uploaded to Wikipedia under a valid license to begin with? Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

In the English Wikipedia, this file is used in four articles. In Amniote, the image was added on December 10, 2023, and in the other three articles, it was added in 2026. The file was added to the articles after it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. It did not replace the local file from the English Wikipedia. There is no information in the edit history of these articles that the local file existed and was used in the articles. I believe that the information when downloading "Cross-wiki upload from en.wikipedia.org" is also inaccurate, as there was no file in the English Wikipedia. GAndy (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

You seem to be correct. I can find no evidence of the Lanthanolania image ever being used on enwiki prior to GleisReis uploading it to Commons. It's hypothetically possible it was uploaded but never used, but I think that's unlikely. Hopefully GleisReis can clarify. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:СӨ Төрүт Сокуона.pdf

This file is broken, please delete it, or i would like to receive help from you to fix this file Sauit (talk) 09:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Raja garam ibrihim abraham.png

Because it's not important Sieghart 4108 (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Audio versions of Wikipedia articles from 2005

This sounds godawful

Trade (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC) @Dronebogus: --Trade (talk) 09:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Even for files from 2005, these sound awful - as if the synthesized speech is coming out of a tin can. It's barely intelligible, and certainly not something that'd be practically listenable. Omphalographer (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Spoken Wikipedia articles using English-language speech synthesis

If someone wants a machine voice synthesized text-to-speech recording of an Wikipedia article they can readily and easily do so simply by using the screen reading programs already built into their device or operating system

In addition the recordings created by Wikipedia's readers are virtually always guaranteed to be relevant and up-to date with current events and corrections while the majority of recordings here are either several years out of date or otherwise severely outdated compared to the current revision of the article they are trying to cover. Filling Commons with text-to-speech recordings is redundant busywork which accomplishes nothing except giving us a steady supply of low quality audio files with little to no practical use

Keep in mind Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia explicitly prohibits synthesized text-to-speech recordings which further cements just how useless all of these files truly are

Trade (talk) 09:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep

no, it's not easy
these are useful, I often listen to them in my podcast audio player and tens of thousands of people are listening to these so these are useful to many – I find these some of the most useful files on Commons and they are what I currently use Commons on my smartphone for nearly exclusively low quality audio files with little to no practical use that's kind of disproven
these aren't just random screenreadings at low-quality but cutting edge voices and reading without the image captions or long tables etc and with abbreviations being read properly etc which required editing the scripts as well as some CSS things; (I described the process at the linked page)
Keep in mind Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia explicitly prohibits synthesized text-to-speech recordings why would a particular WikiProject matter so much? That's just a particular WikiProject's idea and by the way there also is a early-stage WikiProject specifically about AI recordings which I think are of much more listenable quality than the time-wasting unscalable manually-created audios as those are not professional audiobook narrators
otherwise severely outdated compared to the current revision of the article they are trying to cover the idea is to have some tool update these periodically and what you said applies to most (~80%) of files in Category:Spoken Wikipedia much more, these are often included in the Wikipedia article even when they are 10 years old, not even speaking of the unused Spoken Wikipedia recordings on Commons which are often older (many from around 2007), so this is an improvement to the current situation even while not perfect, not a disimprovement just because these are outdated by 2 years
these are also useful as demos as what is possible, eg part of wishes in the Community Wishlist
all but the ʻOumuamua.mp3 and Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia.mp3 (the policy is now named differently and base situation has changed) and the Text to speech rendering of major depression text on Wikipedia.ogg file are COM:INUSE

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

i feel like despite point 3, it should be able to be easily automated. wikipedia does have an api to get the wikitext, and perhaps abbreviations could have their own markup corresponding to the html "abbr" element. hints for automatic readings should probably be inside the wikitext, so that readings can be produced with whatever cutting-edge voice you want, any speed, with those script edits, and also automatically with the latest version of the text. perhaps with the semantic web, any web page could automatically be converted to an audio file Acrions (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I have it in my plans to look into this. Currently a browser addon is used to hide HTML elements with certain classes and then I manually edit the resulting text to fix abbreviations such as "WHO" pronounced as "who" to "World Health Organization". These audios are partly a demo of what's possible. The variety of recordings enable people to find sth they're interested in so they can understand the value of this and give it a genuine try.

Additionally, it could take quite long until somebody else or I implements this if it's currently possible at all. If you're interested in helping with that you'd be very welcome. One major issue is that if this gets widely available this would cause a lot of API requests to those AI voices servers so they may eg block things; and it currently takes about 1 minute of waiting before the result is finished and you can listen to it. You're talking in hypotheticals and ideals. If you can implement what you're describing, please do. More people may see value in this if they can listen to Wikipedia articles at good quality right now. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep

I don't think there is any policy against storing this type of file on wikicommons and you did not mention any. The rules of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia from the English Wikipedia are not relevant here.

From what I can tell, you are not opposed to storing these files on wikicommons but to how they are used in different places. In this context, a deletion request seems to be misguided. For example, you nominated File:Political philosophy - lead section.ogg for deletion. This file is used on a userscript explanation page to showcase how the userscript can read text aloud. Are you saying that this is not acceptable? Or was your deletion nomination of this file unintentional? Phlsph7 (talk) 11:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep

I agree that having a system that reads with this quality on-the-fly would be great, but we don't have it. So voting to keep them. -Theklan (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

We dont have to. Because virtually all Ebook devices sold today already have that functionality Trade (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't have an ebook reader. Lots of people don't have such, especially in poorer countries but even in quite affluent ones. Additionally, you apparently didn't bother to read my prior comment which briefly explains how this is different than screenreaders (explained with more details at the linked page) and this is key to all of this. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment this strikes me as an "I don't like it" nomination. @Trade: is there a specific policy against these that you can cite, or are you making a "new" argument that all AI speech versions of Wikipedia articles are out of scope, or are these particular files somehow problematic whereas there might be other AI speech versions of Wikipedia articles that you believe would be in scope? - Jmabel ! talk 17:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I think i've made my stance clear. If you think the potential for an near unlimited amount of machine synthesized readings provides value to Commons i don't see much for us to argue about Trade (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Trade: no, I can't actually tell which of three positions you are taking here, which is why I asked. - Jmabel ! talk 22:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep I agree that there are problems with using text to speech, Google text to speechhas trouble reading tabular info and will just start reading the numbers and also read the picture captions. I am sure it will improve to ignore tables of numbers in the future. --RAN (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep because Wikimedia doesn’t have a built-in autoreader yet. If it gets one these can be deleted as low quality Dronebogus (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Solar eclipse 2024.png

Appears to be a screenshot, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Khalidrlogo.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 10:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2017 Yay Vikidüşərgəsi - Qax - İçəri Bazar - 25.jpg

COM:FOP Azerbaijan SomeFancyUsername (talk) 10:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2014 Szuszi, Pomnik.jpg

COM:FOP Azerbaijan SomeFancyUsername (talk) 10:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flame Towers.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Former_Soviet_Union Mifter (talk) 06:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flame Towers.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Eclipse esquema en cielo.png

Online stimulation images, unlikely to be uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Reflective rectangular public art installation at Sydney Harbour foreshore.jpg

Lower-resolution version replaced by a higher-quality upload of the same image, which better shows details and reflections in the stainless steel surface. ~ Superseded by this higher-resolution version: File:Stainless steel mirrored rectangular forms public art installation at Sydney Harbour foreshore.jpg JaredMcKenzie (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mongolian COA.png

Elements misrepresented, source link is dead. Saruul 04 (talk) 11:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Kept: PD-Mongolia-exempt. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Mongolian COA.png

The image was drawn incorrectly. A correctly drawn file has already been uploaded. Saruul 04 (talk) 11:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Photo de Guillaume GUERIN.jpg

Non libre de droits : https://www.limoges-metropole.fr/informations-transversales/les-elus-de-limoges-metropole/guillaume-guerin-2-3574 LucasD (talk) 11:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Blason Giroux.svg

Out of COM:SCOPE: No valid reference could be found, nor has any been provided, for this coat of arms which is most likely fictitious or personal. cf COM:NOTHOST.
Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Omsk Oblast(1).svg

{{duplicate|File:Flag of Omsk Oblast.svg}} NoSeeNoBye (talk) 07:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Omsk Oblast(1).svg

This file is a duplicate version of File:Flag of Omsk Oblast.svg NoSeeNoBye (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Firma Ricardo.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 12:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Buenas tardes:

Para justificar el registro en materia de propiedad Industrial de la firma/marca de Ricardo Casstillo, les adjunto los datos del Justificante de pago de TASA en materia de Propiedad Industrial CODIGO 511

Ejercicio: 2024 Localizador:7915114479246

Registrado en la Oficina de Patentes y Marcas de la Juntad e Andalucía en la categoría de ACTIVIDAD DE LA MARCA ACTIVIDAD ARTÍSTICA CULTURAL

A mi nombre: PEPA PINEDA VILLARRUBIA como titular del expediente.

Si desean les ruego me indiquen cómo adjuntar un archivo PDF con el justificante del registro.

Un cordial saludo.

Good afternoon,

To justify the registration in the field of Industrial Property of the signature/brand of Ricardo Castillo, I am attaching the details of the payment receipt for the Industrial Property fee, CODE 511.

Year: 2024

Reference number: 7915114479246

Registered at the Patent and Trademark Office of the Regional Government of Andalusia under the category of TRADEMARK ACTIVITY: ARTISTIC AND CULTURAL ACTIVITY.

In my name: PEPA PINEDA VILLARRUBIA as the holder of the file.

If you wish, please let me know how to attach a PDF file with the registration receipt.

Kind regards.

Pepa Pineda

Sevilla

Spain ~2026-21743-54 (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the International Brigades(1).svg

{{duplicate|File:Emblem of the International Brigades.svg}} NoSeeNoBye (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the International Brigades(1).svg

This file is a duplicate version of File:Emblem of the International Brigades.svg NoSeeNoBye (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Firmenlogo-fairmischt.svg

Blank with no content Rathfelder (talk) 12:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Scaling of false sharing (for Wikipedia).svg

made redudant by me Vibrant franklin (talk) 12:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cardinal Fernando Marinetti.png

Suspected AI generated image ~2026-21209-82 (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Burj Khalifa Park -1 (5373761159).jpg

COM:FOP UAE is not acceptable on Commons. The Address Downtown Dubai is clearly the subject of the photo, as it is so prominent while the filename also reflected this ~2026-21242-07 (talk) 13:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Katerina Cappa, Model.jpg

im the autor and I request deletion Valeriocor (talk) 13:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Soldados mexicanos marchando en la capital (Revolución Mexicana).jpg

wrong date, wrong source, as many files uploaded by this uploader. Xocolatl (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:170th Infantry Brigade SSI.pdf

Not an actual pdf. Replaceable with File:170th Infantry Brigade SSI.png. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Honomatope (talk · contribs)

Unusable files: Incorrect representation of de L'Hermite family's arms, per wrong colours on chief and part #2.

Kontributor 2K (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ayatollahsofqom 1.png

Hoax image manipulated to show Donald Trump on third row, right hand side LizardJr8 (talk) 13:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Original image is File:Grand Ayatollahs Qom فتوکلاژ، آیت الله های ایران-قم 02.jpg. LizardJr8 (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:500px photo (27735571).jpeg

Poor quality nude photo, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

It's not a "nude" photo, but I believe the tattoo is most probably copyrighted, anyway. Uploaded by mistake in the batch. Darwin ^Ahoy! 15:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete unusably low resolution Dronebogus (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete, Low quality. Issac I Navarro (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:ГаллямовЭдуардАбдулхаевич.jpg

Spam, promo of a medical business. Not in use now guess why. Easy... Bilderling (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

UPD. It's the second try. Or third. --Bilderling (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Viniciuspierce (talk · contribs)

Wikimedia Commons is NOT an amateur porn site. COM:PORN

LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep for File:Nude men in Rapa Nui 1.jpg, which is in use --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete all per nom. The one in use could easily be a vanity addition. Dronebogus (talk) 06:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep File:Partially nude standing men with body painting.jpg, the body paint is different then what we have on Commons. Per nom for the other files

Delete. Issac I Navarro (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

File:NGC 2243 DSS.jpg

DSS is copyrightː https://gsss.stsci.edu/Acknowledgements/DSSCopyrights.htm Lithopsian (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

File:NGC 2243 DSS.jpg

DSS is copyrightː https://gsss.stsci.edu/Acknowledgements/DSSCopyrights.htm Lithopsian (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Image of AnythangStudios.png

Don’t want it to be public domain AnythangStudios (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment All images generated by artificial intelligence without significant alteration by a human are considered public domain in the US as they have no human authorship. EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 15:53, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok AnythangStudios (talk) 23:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Personal logo with no educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Fitness Spirit.svg

advertising Rathfelder (talk) 14:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Fitoparty.png

and File:Fitorania.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:YarTim-график обсуждений.png

In 2020, as a 14-year-old schoolboy who liked to engage in "pointless fussing", I uploaded a strange joke graph about Wikipedia. I don't even remember what it means. I propose deleting it according to the rule: Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. Zero uses, zero links. YarTim (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Castle Court School.jpg

No apparent license for the created media on the website: most likely copyrighted Kalabochik (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Nissan X-Trail (Rear), Jakarta, Indonesia.jpg

Extremely illegible and low quality image better examples on Commons LuvsMG481 (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete seems too blurry to be useful. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SMK Terpadu Assafiiyah.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Raden liee alhidayah (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedydelete SDG7 and you're all good. LuvsMG481 (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2017 Nissan X-Trail N-Vision DCi CVT.jpg

Low quality image, better examples in the category notably LuvsMG481 (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

654 × 551 (173 KB) with a distorted perspective. The linked alternative is considerably darker, but 20251128_Automobile_in_Khimki.jpg is similarly bright and of higher quality. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:51, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SUNNATREE.jpg

English: Seems to be a screenshot of the non-free Google Streetview

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Der Rabe

I'm sorry to say, these photos are derivative works of copyrighted cover illustrations, and not free. I regret this, as I'm personally quite fond of this - discontinued - literary magazine, and have a collection of the issues myself, but we would need a permission.

Gestumblindi (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Rabeprivatumschlag.png

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Der Rabe, derivative work of copyrighted cover illustration and therefore not free, unfortunately. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Nach der Logik wäre auch das erste Foto auf der Seite vom Raben 22 problematisch und überhaupt jeder Buchumschlag. Es ist aber etwas anderes, ob man ein Originalkunstwerk aufnimmt oder eine maschinell verbreitete Reproduktion. Ludger Jorißen (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Nein, ist es tatsächlich nicht. Das Urheberrecht ist ein Immaterialgüterrecht und schützt Werke über alle Reproduktionen hinweg. - Das Foto vom Raben 22 ist genauso problematisch und darum habe ich ebenfalls einen Löschantrag darauf gestellt. Es zeigt eine Titelzeichnung von Nikolaus Heidelbach - Inhaber der Rechte ist somit entweder Heidelbach oder eine Person oder Körperschaft, der die ausschliesslichen Nutzungsrechte übertragen wurden (evtl. also jetzt ein Rechtsnachfolger des Haffmans Verlags). Dieser Rechteinhaber müsste eine explizite Freigabe unter einer freien Lizenz erteilt haben, und das müsste nachgewiesen werden. Deine Annahme, dass Urheberrechte durch eine Reproduktion irgendwie "verschwinden", ist schlicht falsch. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:La Danse des renards - Affiche.jpg

Image not in domain public Malvoört (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flash Team LTD.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Anne Frank passport photo, May 1942.jpg

This was taken in 1942, so it was under Dutch copyright until at least 2012, well past the URAA date. It will be under US copyright until 1/1/2038. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flaskyi Emblem.svg

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:MFebruari2012.jpg

I think we should delete this pre-transition photo. The video it comes from has already been taken down Vera ^(talk) 16:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep This image is a still from a video produced by Amsterdam University Press in 2012. It was published by AUP under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license, which means it can rightfully be used on Commons. The given argument does not apply. Vysotsky (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Wappen der Familie v. Pentz.jpg

Künstlerische Wiedergabe eines Wappens mit eigenständiger Schöpfungshöhe. Wirklich "eigenes Werk"? Eigenhändig gezeichnet? GerritR (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:IRON MAIDEN - panoramio.jpg

Bild ist ohne ordentliche Beschreibung unbrauchbar. sk (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flick Content.webp

and File:Soura By Sonu G.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pranavdevp.m dubbing artist (88671).jpg

Copyright violations, see small text at the right side. sk (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete - as per nom. Clear copyvio.

DesiBoy101 (talk) 10:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flickpad logo.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Starcraft II marine at Gamescom 2010 (4905087542).jpg

imho COM:Toys applies here Isderion (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete. COM:TOYS unambiguously applies; not only is this a sculptural work, but the painting on the shoulder would be copyrightable in its own right even if the rest of the model weren't. Omphalographer (talk) 06:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Professor Mahindra P Lama.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Bhattaraibinod3 (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gold pocket watch of Alexandros Mavrokordatos (1791-1865).jpg

The photo is recent and a clock doesn't fall within PD-art because it is a 3D object. C messier (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ford Focus hits Nissan X-Trail (41293321000).jpg

Out of scope, looks like a kids toy hitting a car. Serves no purpose and its a toy car. Toy car in violation of COM:TOYS LuvsMG481 (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

LuvsMG481, this toy car appears to be drivable which makes it a utilitarian object. Its performance and range are undoubtedly crap (but slightly better than a tricycle), but it is utilitarian. If e.g. the windscreen wipers are not functional (which I can't tell from this image) you could argue that those parts are purely artistic, but that would likely be de minimis.
For this image in particular, I don't immediately see how it could be used educationally as it doesn't show the whole thing or any particular aspect. The focus is on the kid polishing the headlight. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:16, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Prussian PotsdamMusket percussion Conversion 00451.jpg

Low quality AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:MIN HEE JIN (민희진).jpg

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 17:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:LL-Q33578 (ibo)-Ozims Divine-Ọkụkọ na-akwa ákwá nwere mgbe ọ bụ àkwá.wav

the pronounciation was not gotten correctly Dagentle (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:FLIPOCLIP DIGITAL LOGO.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Casper Peder Bottelet.jpg

Unnecessary AI upscale Dronebogus (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cresten Nørgaard Nielsen.jpg

Unnecessary AI upscale Dronebogus (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Can you please be more specific than just "unnescessary AI upscale"? Thanks in advance Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 19:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:File-CUnsJXymABMjtFqrtifSKt.webp

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete not useful, bad title. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Freigestelltes "Make Love not war" Symbol, Friedenszeichen, im Chemnitzer Wissensgarten.png

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Don't think so. I took the picture (peace sign) within my garden and then I cropped it, as I didn’t need the green lawn in the background,because I needed it without for an artikle (it's included in at least one external artikle, don't know, if more). But I believe, it makes sense). Dirk Liesch (talk) 07:17, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Impressora 3d.png

AI slop— in use but I presume we have actual images of 3D printers to replace it Dronebogus (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Replaced Dronebogus (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hong Kong Launches SMS Sender Registration to Curb Fraud New.png

AI slop only used on a project that is scheduled for closure anyway Dronebogus (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep no need to delete this in use file. You may prefer it not to be used or would prefer another image; however you'd have to sort out which if there is any suitable one at all and then even that would not be enough. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:21, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Imagen de Multiples Yo Generada por IA.png

AI slop only used on a userpage Dronebogus (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Joseph Factor.png

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry...

Keep, COM:AIP: The image in question is the subject of non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. Source:

Рытиков Б. Боевой путь Иосифа Григорьевича Фактора. — Moscow: АНО «Семейная традиция», 2026. — С. Cover book. — 156 с. — ISBN 978-5-6046824-4-9

The book is available under license CC BY-SA 3.0. (Pls find cover book). — Best Regards, Niklitov (talk) 21:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I think you are misunderstanding what that clause means. That is clearly trivial “coverage” (if it can even be called that) Dronebogus (talk) 22:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete. A use of an AI-retouched image in a book, used to illustrate the person depicted in the original image, is not coverage of the image - it's coverage of the person. Omphalographer (talk) 06:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

This image within the project's scope. The person's face has not been altered Al. The image formatting complies with the project guidelines. The original image is provided in the information section. The original and colorized image was published in a reputable source (with ISBN No). {{AI upscaled}} template is specified. There are no violations. The image complies with COM:AIP rule.

This serves three purposes: it demonstrates that the file in question is an alteration rather than a new generation, it allows others to verify that the source file is available under a free license, and it gives anyone using the altered image an easy way to find the original and make an informed decision about the quality of the alteration.

Please keep this file in the project. — Kind Regards, Niklitov (talk) 09:13, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Niklitov. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

This is an important precedent for welcoming the use of artificial intelligence for scientific purposes. It needs to be clearly spelled out in the rules to preserve the important work of the Wikimedia projects. There is no distortion here. The image is published in a history book. Keep --Erokhin (talk) 02:34, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

This is an important precedent for welcoming the use of artificial intelligence for scientific purposes brother, what are you talking about? It’s an AI colorization of some dude from the past. There is no “science” here. There is no distortion here. The image is a robot guessing the colors and missing details of a B&W photo. How do you know there is no distortion? The image is published in a history book. No, it is used on the cover of the book. Besides not knowing anything about the book itself to vouch for its reliability the cover is a decorative aspect of the work that could’ve been designed without the input of the author or anyone with expert credentials. It is not part of the content of the book. Dronebogus (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Dear Ms Dronebogus! The bibliographic description states that the image was processed by uniformologist and historian Kirill Sergeyevich Vasiliev. He is a recognized expert and has an article about him in the encyclopedia of uniformologists. (You can also see a list of Vasiliev's scientific publications.) So the cover of this book was created by the professional. Niklitov (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Felicitas Guerrero.jpg

Com:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Fma12 (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:General Yahya Khan.png

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Guillaume de LIBERGE de GRANCHAIN.png

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Rolf Enz 2024.jpg

possible copyvio - (c) Karin Merz - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I have permission from the photographer to publish this image under a free license (CC BY-SA 4.0). The rights have been granted to me. ~2026-21240-66 (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

In that case it shouldn't be a problem to have the photographer send her permission to the VRT support as required. --~2026-21382-03 (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Small Skein of Barbed Wire on Deep Blue Background AI.jpg

This isn’t representative of the alleged subject and simply depicts an extremely common item (barbed wire) Dronebogus (talk) 18:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Plenty of real images in Category:Barbed wire, and this doesn't even look like the real thing. Omphalographer (talk) 06:37, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per above, not representative and we have plenty of real-life quality photos. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

File:The cloning of a dinosaur.jpg

Unused AI slop Dronebogus (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Are you sure it wasn't beaming a lizard through the Star Trek transporter?

Delete, per nom. - Jmabel ! talk 22:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Payel De as Behula.jpg

Screenshot of title card, complete with broadcaster's on-screen logo in the corner. Not own work, unlikely to be CC-BY. • a frantic turtle 🐢 18:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

i have edited this picture in the photoshop for uploading in wikipedia. this picture orginally won bye SVF company. I don't claim any copyright.please don't delete the picture. Pitush Chandra Debnath (talk) 15:49, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Vámosgyörk, Nepomuki Szent János-szobor 2025 öntőforma készítése 02.jpg

Unused AI imagery Dronebogus (talk) 18:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep Same here, this is not AI, I accidentally left in the AI reference from a previously uploaded AI map. Pasztilla (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Vámosgyörk, Nepomuki Szent János-szobor 2025 öntőforma készítése 01.jpg

Unused AI image Dronebogus (talk) 18:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Dronebogus: What are you talking about??? There is no AI involved, this is a photograph, picturing how a sculptor is making a mold. Pasztilla (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep Ok, I see, I accdentally left in a prompt of a previously uploaded AI map. Now I deleted it from the page, as this is clearly not AI. Pasztilla (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:William Penn.svg

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Payel De as Behula - Audition Still.jpg

Image taken from Facebook with no indication that it was released as CC-BY. Not Own Work. • a frantic turtle 🐢 18:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:William Holland Thomas AI Colorization from Historical original photo with the Library of Congress.jpg

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The historical photo is of a non-living historical person and does not seek to change how the person looked. It will not offend any user of the photo. Before adding this note, I looked at the type of images you upload and they are partial clips of other people's works from history. How is that different. You did not insult the creator of the original larger image. As far as the users of your uploads many people could be offended because many of your works are explicit in nature. Jackson Bus Garage (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:గుణడిబ్బ.png

Unused AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Пример треш-стрима.jpg

Unused AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Военнослужащие Красной армии разбирают границу между БССР и Западной Белоруссией 1939 г. book-olds.ru.jpg

Fake AI image Dronebogus (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Theft nail polish shoplifting AI 3.jpg

Unused AI image Dronebogus (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:U4C election vote box for diff.jpg

Unused OOS edit Dronebogus (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep the file is used in a diff article here: https://diff.wikimedia.org/2026/02/21/u4c-election-why-it-needs-you/ (and now also here: m:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Election/2026).--Civvì (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
I didn’t see that. I guess it can be kept in that case Dronebogus (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Schadenfreude.png

A woman smirking at her phone does not illustrate “schadenfreude”; only used in a gallery of (I guess) potentially useful images, not in an article or anything like that Dronebogus (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep (as contributor).

Reason: Useful for the educational purpose of teaching about the psychology of human emotion and the distinct facial expressions of specific emotional states.

Evidence: An undergraduate lecture about individual emotions as part of the v:Motivation and emotion course at the University of Canberra: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-XdVSEAVAWahOMksgubomM75asUHHwjuyCA3k2gYEUA/edit?slide=id.p48#slide=id.p48 -- Jtneill - Talk 17:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Well that use isn’t very good since nobody is going to get “schadenfreude” from this image. If you want to teach your students with AI slop, great. Just don’t contribute to the ongoing AI slop problem on Commons. Dronebogus (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Where suitable freely licensed photos of specific facial expressions exist, they are preferred. For some nuanced emotions (e.g., schadenfreude), such images are limited, so I supplement with genAI-generated examples. The limitations of all images are instructional: we discuss each image (real and generated) to consider how reliably facial cues signal emotion and the difficulty of inferring internal states from expressions. An image need not be "perfect" to be educational.

If a stronger, freely licensed example of schadenfreude is available, please point to it. Previously I used File:Smug face cropped.jpg, but a more realistic image would be preferable. -- Jtneill - Talk 06:41, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Eduardo Zamacois y Zabala - Regreso al convento.jpg is a perfect example of Schadenfreude. The issue is that Schadenfreude is a contextual emotion based entirely on the reaction (happiness/amusement/satisfaction) another’s emotion (unhappiness/suffering), not an emotion that can be conveyed through a person’s face alone. Even the AI image relies on implicit context (the woman is smirking at something schadenfreude-inducing on her phone) but that makes it ambiguous (maybe she’s just smug about being right about something?). The painting, however, clearly shows how the other monks are taking pleasure in the misfortune of the monk with a donkey. Dronebogus (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

The subject is facial expressions, which themselves are very far from conveying the meaning of the emotion but that's not the subject so you just confirm the point I made below. No need to delete this. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep misunderstanding from what the image is supposed to illustrate. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:18, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flow 2.0.png

Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2 logo 07Apr.png

Trademarked company logo, not suitable for Commons. Uploaded in error. Stsomkul (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ohv.jpg

Private company logo, company deemed unnotable at fi-wiki, therefore out of Commons project scope. Licensing also unclear if genuinely CC. Onsilla (talk) 19:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ullersreuth-Wappen.jpg

Jahr 1910 anhand der Quelle nicht nachvollziehbar. Der unprofessionellen und unheraldischen Optik nach inoffizielles Pseudowappen, daher out of scope und gleichzeitig urheberrechtlich problematisch GerritR (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Das Wappen ist das offizielle Wappen des Dorfes. Es wird vom Ort selbst geführt (alte Stempel sind überliefert) und ist auch in der Hauptgemeinde Hirschberg so geführt und auf deren Homepage abgebildet. Warum es so einfach und unheraldisch gezeichnet wurde, kann ich bisher nicht sagen. Es soll auf jeden Fall einen Krautkopf darstellen, der dort zu früheren Zeiten überwiegend angebaut wurde.

https://www.stadt-hirschberg-saale.de/inhalte/stadt_hirschberg/_inhalt/unsere_stadt/ortsteile/ortsteile Harbardstein (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Art002e009006 (upside down).jpg

Useless image with wrong description, as ist has been upside-downed. PM3 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

i just copied what this photo did: File:Earth From the Perspective of Artemis II (upside down).jpg - Wikimedia Commons . is that file useless? no! so is this one useless too? no! Anonymsiy (talk) 19:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep There is no relevant "up" or "down" here. @PM3: do you also think all aerial photographs of places on Earth need to have north at the top? - Jmabel ! talk 22:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep If the issue is that the description is wrong then fix it. Jurta (talk) 11:20, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Naturalization Residence Requirements by Country (Years of Residence) 2026-03-26.svg

I loaded the file but it's not shown oreectly ~2026-21317-21 (talk) 19:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Albert Schamoni Urwald 1928.jpg

Anhand der Signatur scheint "Albert Schamoni" der Künstler zu sein, das Bild stammt aber nicht von ihm. Sowohl Malstil als auch Motiv unterscheiden sich sehr stark von seinen anderen Arbeiten und passen nicht in das Oevre (siehe z.B. Webseite www.albert-schamoni.de). Dessen Sohn schließt die Urheberschaft von Albert Schamoni an dem Bild aus. Wutzz (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Das ist interessant, auch ein Grund, das Bild aus dem Artikel zu nehmen, und auch ein Grund, diese Angaben hinzuzufügen, aber eigentlich kein Löschgrund. Die Gegenfrage ist ja: Wieso sollte jemand das Werk oder die Signatur eines so obskuren Künstlers fälschen? Kommt mir recht sonderbar vor. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 08:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo beaufort5.png

unprecisely drawn, and does not symbolize Bft 5, but 4 - also, not used by any page. Hi.ro (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo beaufort2.png

does not symbolize Bft 2, but 1 - also, not used by any page. Hi.ro (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo beaufort3.png

unprecisely drawn, and does not symbolize Bft 3, but 2 - also, not used by any page. Hi.ro (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo beaufort4.png

unprecisely drawn, and does not symbolize Bft 4 but 3 - also, not used by any page. Hi.ro (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo beaufort6.png

unprecisely drawn, and does not symbolize Bft 6, but 5 - also, not used by any page. Hi.ro (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo beaufort7.png

unprecisely drawn, and does not symbolize Bft 7, but 6 - also, not used by any page. Hi.ro (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Petronius Maximus inscription.jpg

The licenses "PD-US-expired" and "PD-old-70" are surely wrong: In the book where the image was taken from (see the link under "source"), the author of the book himself is listed as photographer of this image (see online version, subscription required; see alternatively the "List of illustrations" on p. IX of the print version). This is w:Bertrand Lançon who still lives and seems to have given no consent in the use of his photograph here. DerMaxdorfer (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Oppose after correcting the tag. Per File:Narmer Palette.jpg, File:Peribsen.jpg, Indian princess and Columbia.jpg, File:PulitzerGlass.jpg, and many other objects. The actual creator of the piece died over 1600 years ago. Taking a photo of it does not give you copyright over it. Jon698 (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
That puts the inscription itself into public domain, not the perspectival photograph of the threedimensional object taken by a contemporary photograph/researcher. Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Art (copies of) ("If the 3D artwork is old enough to be in the public domain, you may upload a photograph you have taken yourself. If the photograph was taken by somebody else, you need the photographer’s permission, since the photograph is copyright-protected, despite depicting art that is not.") normally applies to ancient sculptural objects like altars, even when the focus is on one single side (that is carved as well!). If the picture had been taken frontally, one might argue that it is only a simple, technical reproduction of a text in public domain, but this isn't the case here as well. (If the file isn't deleted, you should add categories to make it usable.) DerMaxdorfer (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Alfredo Corell.jpg

Es una foto muy antigua. No corresponde con su imagen actual Gramabar (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep No reason for deletion. We tend to keep historical images too, and image is legitimately COM:INUSE Btrs (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:LOLOET art202511.jpg

This file is reproduced from this page. This photo is not licensed under a free license such as GFDL or CC BY-SA. It violates copyright. Balmung0731 (talk) 21:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2018 Capitol tornado.jpg

Replacing Speedy Deletion with Normal Deletion Request. Speedy Deletion notice claimed footage that was published under creative commons was stolen, however I have reason to suspect that isnt the case, as the only footage thats similar between the two is the dash-cam from the entire tour, the rest of the footage is not seen in the original source. Quincy Gordon (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete – I took some time to compare the video I had linked (this one) to the source video within the image, and the camera angles and sounds appeared to line up with various moments within the original video throughout the video used as the source for the still, which leads me to believe that it is stolen from the copyrighted video. Chris ☁️^{(talk - contribs)} 21:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per Chris Lightbulb Noob (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Royal Border Bridge (R.P. Leitch).jpg

Replaced with larger version File:Royal Border bridge in Lives of the Engineers 1862.jpg Thuresson (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Vrije-terugkeerbaan.png

no more needed ChristiaanPR (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Vrije-terugkeerbaan.png

no more needed ChristiaanPR (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lord Byron.png

Replaced with higher quality File:Engraving of Lord-Byron after a painting by William Edward West.jpg Thuresson (talk) 22:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Dr. goh + child.jpg

Nominating for deletion under Wikimedia Commons' personality rights policy. The subject of this image, Dr. Suzanne Goh, did not consent to her likeness being published or licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0. The file was uploaded by a former employee of Cortica without Dr. Goh's knowledge or authorization. As the identifiable subject of the image, she has the right to object to its publication and free redistribution. Requesting removal on these grounds. Corticacare (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Social Engagement Meaningful contribution.png

AI slop. Dronebogus (talk) 23:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I noticed your recent removal of an image from a Wikiversity project page.

Would you be able to clarify the reasoning for this change? In particular, I would appreciate understanding what is meant by “AI slop” in this context and which policies or guidelines inform this action and deletion request.

May I also suggest discussing image removals from project pages in advance (unless the files have been deleted on Commons)? This would help maintain shared understanding and coordination among contributors. -- Jtneill - Talk 00:50, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:MyPythonScript.png

I needed this to explain something to someone. It is no longer needed. It is a screenshot of an old Python script that I was playing around with at the time. Polygnotus (talk) 23:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/2026/04/06

April 6

Files uploaded by Ibirapuera (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Ibirapuera (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Atarrabi by Midjourney

Files in Category:Belagile by Midjourney

Files in Category:Basque mythology by Midjourney

Files in Category:Basajaun by Midjourney

Files in Category:Mairu by Midjourney

Files in Category:Sorgin by Midjourney

Files in Category:Ireltxu by Midjourney

Files in Category:Ihizi by Midjourney

Files in Category:Patxi Errementaria by Midjourney

Files uploaded by Asavikin (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Audio versions of Wikipedia articles from 2005

Files in Category:Spoken Wikipedia articles using English-language speech synthesis

Files uploaded by Honomatope (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Viniciuspierce (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Der Rabe