Commons:Deletion requests/2026/04/07

April 7

File:Czu MLP clop Wikimare.jpg

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

A PNG version of this file is available Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

deseo eliminar ambas, como comunicador y fotógrafo quería mostrar el avance del rock en el país pero la calidad de la imagen y el sentido me hacen considerar toda la sección actualmente irrelevante, debido a que yo subí la foto espero de todo corazón su ayuda para eliminarlas Rodrick Icaza Solórzano (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
 Comment - The above comment is talking actually about these files: 1, 2, 3. It is not about this DR. Preceding unsigned comment added by Amogus502 (talk  contribs)
Mi español anda poquito oxidado, pero creo que estás hablando de música.
Esto es, Clop explícito con la frase «dominio público», que puede entenderse como un doble sentido referido a la cosificación sexual. Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you @Dronebogus for the comment. Above, in my comment in Spanish, I stated a similar statement. Issac I Navarro (talk) 00:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
 Comment No opinion on this as a DR, but I should warn anyone stumbling upon this that the image is a NSFW pornographic image of a cartoon horse’s anus and vagina. Dronebogus (talk) 16:56, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
The PNG file is not only larger resolution, but also doesn't contain artifacts (since the compression is lossless).  Speedy delete per COM:F8, after the VRT transfer of course. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 18:57, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
 Info @Amogus502 placed the VRT tag on File:Czu MLP clop Wikimare.png. Not sure if this counts as proper "transferring", though. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 17:29, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
Well, I did it expecting a VRTS member's review or something lol Amogus502 (talk) 04:15, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
 Comment - Before deleting this file, it will be necessary to "transfer" the VRTS tag. Preceding unsigned comment added by Amogus502 (talk  contribs)


File:Андрій Вінцковський — український волонтер та громадський діяч.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 02:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Why do you assume that this was created with AI? Theklan (talk) 17:25, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
The image file contains C2PA metadata which identifies it as having been generated by ChatGPT. You can verify this using https://c2paviewer.com/. (Make sure to use the original photo, not a thumbnail.) Omphalographer (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RAJAH KOLAMBU STATUE.jpg

Unfortunately, there is still no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. This is likely a copyrighted statue, considering that it was built in the 2010s. Wikimedia Commons cannot host images of this statue due to the restrictive law of the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)


Hello, what about re-uploading this photo to Wikipedia, is it okey? Lucky Ambago Purok Otso (talk) 03:15, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
@Lucky Ambago Purok Otso unfortunately, monuments cannot be uploaded locally. EnWiki only follows US laws. Under US copyright law, FoP does not apply to non-architecture (see COM:FOP US). Essentially, any "pictorial, sculptural, or graphic artwork".
The only option is if you can create an article about this particular artwork and import your image there under a fair use tag (see w:en:File:MacArthur Landing Memorial sculputres.jpg for example). But perhaps I can say "good luck," because the article should pass w:en:WP:GNG, most especially in terms of using reliable, secondary sources. Any unused image of non-architectural monument on enWiki are always submitted for removal as unused non-free files. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 05:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:27 club mural.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Israel A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)


Hello there, from my understanding of FoP in Israel, it is permited since the graffiti is permanently situated in a public place. "Broadcasting, or copying by way of photography, drawing, sketch or similar visual description, of an architectural work, a work of sculpture or work of applied art, are permitted where the aforesaid work is permanently situated in a public place." LeRenartQuiPense (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:27 Club mural with pigeon.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Israel A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)


Hello there, from my understanding of FoP in Israel, it is permited since the graffiti is permanently situated in a public place. "Broadcasting, or copying by way of photography, drawing, sketch or similar visual description, of an architectural work, a work of sculpture or work of applied art, are permitted where the aforesaid work is permanently situated in a public place." LeRenartQuiPense (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:27 Club mural with pigeon 2.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Israel A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)


Hello there, from my understanding of FoP in Israel, it is permited since the graffiti is permanently situated in a public place. "Broadcasting, or copying by way of photography, drawing, sketch or similar visual description, of an architectural work, a work of sculpture or work of applied art, are permitted where the aforesaid work is permanently situated in a public place."
I apologize for responding with a CopyPaste. If I'm mistaken I would appreciate an explanation. Thanks in advance. LeRenartQuiPense (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Fazenda Campestre ovinos.jpg

EXIF indicates a screeenshot; doubtful own work Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Neutral no matches on the internet Duckmather (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Admiralty Station big window 2023 06 part2.jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Given this is integrated into a curved glass window with those vertical plates, I would consider this a 2D work of artistic craftsmanship, which is allowable to reproduce in Hong Kong freedom of panorama. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:44, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Instant cultes gourmatché.jpg

Seems to be copy of a facebook picture https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1254851690159583&set=d41d8cd9 -- Jakubhal 05:02, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Moment culte goumatché.jpg

Possible copyright violation. Copy of the facebook picture https://www.facebook.com/100069042915761/photos/d41d8cd9/1254851660159586/ -- Jakubhal 05:04, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Auray - le port de Saint-Goustan - Bretagne - France - Flickr - guymoll.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Chemin de campagne - Flickr - Carl Hal.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 05:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Maqaumat (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: Personal fiction? United Balochistan does not exist. Flags of Balochistan that resemble that flag do have a white star instead of an orange one; and I have not yet seen implications that it finds usage in Iranian Sistan.

Enyavar (talk) 06:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  • In order:

Duckmather (talk) 07:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep, it doesn't matter whether United Balochistan exists or not, such a map is useful for depictions of the wider Balochistan region in Iran and Pakistan. No United Punjab or United Ireland exists but such maps exist on Wikimedia Commons. Also, the flag on the File:Flag map of the Balochistan region.png is not wrong? The star is white, not orange. The flag used on can be seen at File:Balochistan Flag.svg. And it does find usage among in Iranian Sistan and Balochistan province, especially among diasporas such as File:Demonstration in support of the Baloch people of Iran (London) September 2023 (3).JPG Maqaumat (User talk:Maqaumat) 10:56, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
I am not arguing that the flag of Pakistani-Balochistan does not exist; I argue that this flag does not apply to some "unified Balochistan" country, which is depicted here like a unified nation that includes Iranian Sistan but excludes Afganistan territories. The same applies to the other map. A depiction like File:Unified Balochistan Map in Orange Color.jpg is okay in my upinion, because it highlights the region but also the national borders of the three current nations that share Baloch minorities.
Also, you are free to report similar "United Punjab" flag maps. --Enyavar (talk) 23:01, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Guitar Pro 8 on macOS.png

Screenshot of non-free software. Jcb (talk) 07:04, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello,
Why do you want to delete this file? Oclero (talk) 07:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Guitar Pro 8 is indeed non-free software (the EULA states that AROBAS MUSIC retains, as rights holder, the intellectual property rights on the GUITAR PRO software and its components), so I agree with the nom:  Delete as a copyright infringement. Duckmather (talk) 07:05, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pr. Jean Verne 1980.jpg

Couleurs trop vives VenB1 (talk) 07:26, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep looks like a perfectly fine archival photo to me Duckmather (talk) 07:08, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:James Fraser Scott - 0ae0c31ee9.jpg

Completely inferior and misidentified version of File:Apollo 15 flag, rover, LM, Irwin.jpg Nutshinou (talk) 07:41, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hako Citymaster 2000.jpg

This deletion request also applied to:

I doubt that this image was taken by the uploader or was published under a free licence.
The image was uploaded by "Hako-Werke Pressestelle" thus claiming with it's name that it's the (official) press office of the manufacturer and marking it as {{Own work}} (as it is tradition of course). By looking at the account itself, I see it as far more likely that the account is just used for uploading copyvios for the original account creator to be never seen ever again.
@Hako-Werke Pressestelle: Can you tell us more about the image situation? --D-Kuru (talk) 08:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tlali.jpg

The sculpture was designed in the 2020s. According to this article, it is intended to be located in the United States, where there is no freedom of panorama. If the photo was taken in Mexico City, where the author lives but it is unclear if the sculpture is there, there is freedom of panorama. @Orozcogiacomo: to clarify where the photo was taken. Tbhotch 09:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

The photo was taken in Mexico City, in the artist's studio, previous to its installation in the United States. I will clarify this in the article. Thank you. Orozcogiacomo (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Kept. Withdrawn by nominator. Tbhotch 21:17, 28 March 2026 (UTC)


File:Tlali.jpg

I jumped to conclusions in my previous post because I overlooked a detail. Freedom of panorama is exclusive to public spaces in Mexico ("VII. Reproduction, communication, and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs, and audiovisual means of works visible from public places"). All the sources I’ve consulted consistently state that this work is located inside the artist’s studio in Coyoacán, Mexico, including the source above. However, this studio is not open to the general public, nor is a museum. The studio looks like this from the outside , so it is imposible to take pictures from the street. The file needs to be deleted and re-uploaded as fair use at the English Wikipedia instead Tbhotch 08:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Rajagopuram of Azhagiya Nambi Rayar Temple, Thirukurungudi.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Niranjan Ramamurthy as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader request: I am the photographer, but I realized I do not have the necessary commercial release permissions from the temple authorities to publish this under a free license.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discusssion. As this image is shot outdoors, it doesn't seem to be reasonable that an additional permission is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Paola Cruciani.jpg

copyright by Alessandro Greggia, needs authorization Caulfield (talk) 08:48, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:En-HotWheelsWorldRaceVideoGame-article.ogg

Low quality reading in every sense ChemicalSkylines (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:LogoSupercode.png

Jestem autorem tego pliku i nie chcę, aby był dostępny na Commons. SupercodePL (talk) 10:33, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2001-was-a-project-by-wolfgang-staehle-e28093-on-8-september-2001-two-cameras-would-automatically-take-a-photo-of-the-manhattan-skyline-every-four-seconds (cropped).jpg

Even though this photo was a result of an automated camera, I have concerns of the usage of PD-automated in licensing this file for commons usage. The camera was owned by Mr. Wolfgang Staehle and hence these frames were taken by automated camera under his inputs. As a result, these frames of Flight 11 impacting North Tower are copyrighted by Mr, Staehle (as per web article using his image) until there is an explicit permission from Mr. Staehle confirming that these frames can be used freely (through VRTS in Commons). Bookish Worm (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2001-was-a-project-by-wolfgang-staehle-e28093-on-8-september-2001-two-cameras-would-automatically-take-a-photo-of-the-manhattan-skyline-every-four-seconds.jpg

Copyright issue. Although these photo frames of Flight 11 impacting North Tower are automatically taken, the camera is set up by Wolfgang Staehle. Hence these frames are copyrighted by Mr. Staehle and not in public domain unless there is explicit permission of him stating so. Bookish Worm (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - automatic camera. This was set up to take a wide panorama and only by luck was the impact photographed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:2001-was-a-project-by-wolfgang-staehle-e28093-on-8-september-2001-two-cameras-would-automatically-take-a-photo-of-the-manhattan-skyline-every-four-seconds.jpg

Even though this photo was a result of an automated camera, I have concerns of the usage of PD-automated in licensing this file for commons usage. The camera was owned by Mr. Wolfgang Staehle and hence these frames were taken by automated camera under his inputs. As a result, these frames of Flight 11 impacting North Tower are copyrighted by Mr, Staehle (as per web article using his image) until there is an explicit permission from Mr. Staehle confirming that these frames can be used freely (through VRTS in Commons). Bookish Worm (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:American Airlines Flight 11 approach (first frame).jpg

Even though this photo was a result of an automated camera, I have concerns of the usage of PD-automated in licensing this file for commons usage. The camera was owned by Mr. Wolfgang Staehle and hence these frames were taken by automated camera under his inputs. As a result, these frames of Flight 11 impacting North Tower are copyrighted by Mr, Staehle (as per web article using his image) until there is an explicit permission from Mr. Staehle confirming that these frames can be used freely (through VRTS in Commons). Bookish Worm (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:American Airlines Flight 11 approach (second frame).jpg

Even though this photo was a result of an automated camera, I have concerns of the usage of PD-automated in licensing this file for commons usage. The camera was owned by Mr. Wolfgang Staehle and hence these frames were taken by automated camera under his inputs. As a result, these frames of Flight 11 impacting North Tower are copyrighted by Mr, Staehle (as per web article using his image) until there is an explicit permission from Mr. Staehle confirming that these frames can be used freely (through VRTS in Commons). Bookish Worm (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:American Airlines Flight 11 approach (third frame).jpg

Even though this photo was a result of an automated camera, I have concerns of the usage of PD-automated in licensing this file for commons usage. The camera was owned by Mr. Wolfgang Staehle and hence these frames were taken by automated camera under his inputs. As a result, these frames of Flight 11 impacting North Tower are copyrighted by Mr, Staehle (as per web article using his image) until there is an explicit permission from Mr. Staehle confirming that these frames can be used freely (through VRTS in Commons). Bookish Worm (talk) 11:14, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Foire Internationale de Lille.jpg

Unfree licence, the photograph was taken between 1956 and 1966, it won't be PD unknown author until 2036. Arflhn (talk) 11:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:หมอปลา ปลากระป๋อง Dr.P.jpg

That's not an image he holds the copyright to. Jeabbabe (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2017 Außenansicht Geschäft.jpg

possible copyvio - (c) Volker Neumann - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:13, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello,
The image shows the building of Möhle Schlafkultur in Löhne.
I am authorized to publish this image on behalf of Möhle Schlafkultur.
The image is released under the Creative Commons license CC BY-SA 4.0.
If further confirmation is required, I can provide permission via email.
Best regards
Felix Möhle
Möhle Schlafkultur Femoe7 (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
no sorry not good enough. Email OTRS ASAP and they will put a ticket in and once all good, it will show in permissions log LuvsMG481 (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Charlie Tiu Hay Ang Most Wanted Poster (cropped).jpg

While the photograph was sourced from a wanted poster by the NBI (Philippine government work). The image itself is not. A PEP.ph report credits the image to "GMA News/Facebook" (link) Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

 Support, did not realize this was a picture from GMA. Wilson Palacpac III (talk) 05:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Leonardoperdomo.jpg

I suspect that the uploader falsely claimed this file as his/her own in order to use it in a draft article on English Wikipedia.

The original image was taken during a photoshoot for the BKFC fighting organization and Triller (BKFC’s owner), and a higher-quality version is publicly available on the fighter’s profile.

If the uploader was the actual photographer or rights holder, he/she would have uploaded the image in full quality for general use, rather than a suspiciously low-quality version. SerYoga (talk) 13:33, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:DDG-125 acceptance trials.jpg

Photo courtesy of Huntington Ingalls Industries' Ingalls Shipbuilding division - this not PD US Navy Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

 Comment: The description page also states: "This photograph is considered public domain and has been cleared for release." זיו「Ziv」For love letters and other notes 15:57, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
That comment applies to all files hosted by Navsea. The fact of the matter is that its not the work of a US Govt official. This situation is not unique- we often delete courtesy photos posted on divds or similar
Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
@Gbawden: It may be as you wrote; I personally am not familiar enough with the websites of American authorities. But I would probably upload the file to Commons in good faith if I saw the notice on the website. To me, it sounds as if the copyright to the image has been assigned to Navsea, and Huntington Ingalls Industries agree to its distribution and publication. If deletion does occur, the file is currently COM:INUSE. Wikipedia articles or lists should at least be updated with a different image of the ship before deletion. זיו「Ziv」For love letters and other notes 12:20, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Kloster Germerode von SW Ludwig Bickell vor 1900.jpg

Exact or scaled-down duplicate. No redirect necessary. HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Kloster Germerode von O Ludwig Bickell vor 1900.jpg

Exact or scaled-down duplicate. No redirect necessary. HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 14:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:P La Liberte.svg

image vectorization error ThebananaMonkeys (talk) 17:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Meet the Tiger.djvu

I'm not shure does this book was simultaneously published in US to be keep there. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 19:05, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep Appears the US publisher was from Garden City, New York. --RAN (talk) 19:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
     Comment The story in the book was published in UK in 1928 (the home country of the author) and in US in 1929.
    Copyright in US expired in 2025, but not yet in UK, so this file should be deleted. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 08:44, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. This was published primarily in the United States; Doubleday is an American publisher, after all. I’m not sure where else it could have been considered to be published. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Stemma Accadia.svg

Il file è errato ho caricato quelo giuisto sulla pagina Comune di Accadia (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Trippie Redd Photo by Kris Knesel.jpg

Photo missing VRT confirmation. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Unlikely to be proved since user who uploaded image is inactive (see User talk:Black Kite#Appealing to you for advice on Wikipedia, where other relevant info is). User @Shoot for the Stars is requesting deletion in order to promote their own image (see Talk:Trippie Redd#Photo and edit summaries on Trippie Redd on Wikipedia). I believe the deletion request should be denied – Keep. [links to the places I recommend: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Black_Kite#Appealing_to_you_for_advice , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trippie_Redd#Photo , https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trippie_Redd&action=history] Scientelensia (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
It might also be noted that @Shoot for the Stars has an extensive history of not understanding the way this site works (creation/deletion): https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shoot_for_the_Stars&oldid=970874233 Scientelensia (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Fwiw, from 2019 credits the pic with Commons. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Trippie Redd Photo by Kris Knesel (cropped).jpg

The photo is missing VRT confirmation Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Why is VRT needed? There is metadata, it appears to be of the subject (a performer) at a concert/event and I do not see any original publication preceding this. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:ABande120.jpg

This file was initially tagged by LevandeMänniska as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 but in use by trwp DaB. (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete, doesn't appear to be anything different then what Commons currently has. Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 06:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep per COM:INUSE. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

File:The Geek and The Detective.png

The logo was added for purely promotional purposes. Therefore, it should be deleted. Gymnicus (talk) 19:49, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

This image is my own original work. I created the artwork and hold full copyright. Permission is granted for use under the license provided. 972suhar (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Mitun m das.png

This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 but in use by two wikipedias at the moment. DaB. (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Afisha finalu Kubka Radianskoji Ukrajiny 1938.jpg

hoax, see this. Futbollo (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment if I'm understanding the machine translation correctly this appears to be a ticket to the 1938 Cup of the Ukrainian SSR, which was indeed a real event that occurred at the Dynamo Stadium in Kyiv in 1938. No idea if the photo is authentic or not though. Duckmather (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who (The Invasion) Robert Sidaway - Douglas Camfieldl.jpg

Very likely copyright violation, Commons:PRP applies. This appears to be a cropped version of a photo copyrighted to the BBC, according to The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2024/sep/09/robert-sidaway-obituary XCBRO172 (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Eva Charles Mwambene.jpg

Copyright Violation, picture shows uploader NDG (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by SquareGiftbox (talk · contribs)

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 20:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ed Swiderski.jpg

Should invoke COM:PCP. Can't tell whether it's a self-portrait or a well-made professional photo. George Ho (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep If there's no evidence that it's ever been uploaded to a stock image site or the like then there's no reason to assume the file is a copyrighted photo. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Участники ВИА Ариэль.jpg

Apparently fails the mandatory prerequisites of COM:AIIP, namely:
"Images of identifiable people created by AI are not allowed on Commons unless at least one of the following criteria are met:

  • The image in question was published by the person it depicts
  • The image in question is the subject of non-trivial coverage by reliable sources" Grand-Duc (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
The man in the hat is the famous Soviet and Russian musician Valery Yarushin. --Uomo del Mondo (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
That interjection is not really pertinent to the AI problem and deletion proposal rationale, if anything, it further demonstrates why that image is not allowed on Commons. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:08, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Elionicon (talk · contribs)

Uploader claims photos are their own work, but they are the subject of most of the photos. Family Feud photos seem to be photos taken by friends or the crew or a production photograph or screengrab.

William Graham (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Jerry Bird American Skydiver.jpg

Copyright does not appear to belong to uploader. This image appears elsewhere online, specifically on Linda Collison's website. I asked the uploader to confirm that the photo belongs to them a week ago on their Wikipedia user page, and they have not responded.Viriditas (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teletón 2017 - Yamila Reyna - 04.jpg

we have another pics for uplouad Productora Femme (talk) 23:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

??? Carlos yo (Discusión) 00:55, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Bankdirektør Jeppe Jepsen, Ribe.jpg

COM:AIIP Dronebogus (talk) 23:31, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Beretta trigger bar.png

Unused AI image Dronebogus (talk) 23:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)