File:Portali del Duomo di Orvieto.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 13:09:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Portali del Duomo di Orvieto.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portali del Duomo di Orvieto.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
•  Info: Gothic portals of the Orvieto Cathedral, Umbria. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --heylenny (^talk/_edits) 13:22, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support In my opinion, a beautiful, well-balanced photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support I might sharpen a little, though. JayCubby (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

  I do not think the picture needs to be more sharpened, maybe saturate it a bit more. Laurunia2002 (talk) 06:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 20:23, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support -- It's often hard to pick a place to stop when framing detail shots like this, this is well-chosen. Acroterion (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 16:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:54, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Beautiful building, but compositionally I don't like how the circular rose window on top is cut off like that. Also, the image has some minor uncorrected pincushion distortion. The white balance here also seems a great deal warmer than most images in Category:Facade of Duomo di Orvieto but it is probably acceptable (perhaps the limestone is naturally yellowish and the other photos in the category are too cool). Finally, it's also my personal opinion that for static architectural photos in good light, we can do better than a phone photo from a 6 year old smartphone, but I suppose the sharpness and resolution are alright compared to many other FP candidates. dllu (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:40, 20 April 2026 (UTC)