User talk:Syntaxys/2025/July

Category:User talk archives#Syntaxys/2025

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-28 G11-0097 Achim-Lammerts Sondernheim-Rathausplatz-Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-28 G11-0100 Achim-Lammerts Sondernheim-Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Einsortierungen in streets and squares

Hallo! Die jüngsten Einsortierungen in die Category:Streets and squares in Rheinzabern kann ich nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Hier sollten eigentlich nur Bilder und Kategorien von Straßen und (befestigten und i. d. R. benannten) Plätzen rein. Viele Grüße P170 (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Das hatte ich schon vermutet, wie sortiert man sie dann ein? In der Hauptkategorie zur Gemeinde sollten ja eher verwaltungsspezifische Medien einsortiert sein, oder ist das anders?

EDIT:
In Westheim ist es aähnlich gelöst: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Streets_and_squares_in_Westheim_(Pfalz)
Syntaxys (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Falls Du im Fall Westheim die Landesstraßen meinst: Die sind ja auf den Fotos zu sehen (wenngleich sie jeweils nicht die Hauptrolle spielen). In einer idealen Kategorienstruktur ist in der Hauptkategorie zur Gemeinde gar nichts drin, ansonsten hilfsweise eben doch :-) Den (Weg am) Friedhof und den Brunnen würde ich nach meinem Geschmack noch rausnehmen, da ersterer eben nur ein Weg und keine Straße ist (hier wieder zur Erklärung: Die Dr. Georg-Heeger-Allee in Westheim ist zwar auf dem Bild nur ein Fußweg, aber hat ein Straßenschild und ist am nördlichen Ende auch tatsächlich kurz eine Straße) und der Ort des Brunnens noch unbekannt ist (ich vermute mal, dass das kein größerer Platz ist). Noch ganz by the way: Die Sortierungen von Kategorien erfolgen bei Eigennamen mit Buchstaben (Beispiel: Straßenkategorien) und ansonsten ohne Registerbuchstabe. Das muss ich in Westheim unbedingt für die Hauptkategorie noch umsetzen. P170 (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
P. S.: Glückwunsch zu deinen Auszeichnungen! P170 (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Also in erster Linie versuche ich mich an die Regeln zu halten, aber da ich nicht alles erfragen kann, schaue ich mir das halt ab, wie es vermutlich richtig ist. Aber korrigieren lässt sich das ja zum Glück immer 😉
Ich habe die Bilder in der Natur mal unter „Nature in Rheinzabern“ einsortiert, unter diesem Topic gibt's auch viele Kategorien, wie ich gesehen habe.
Da ich noch einiges an Material hinzufügen werde, brauche ich eine vernünftige Sortierung. Nicht alles hat mit dem Ortskern zu tun, viele Bilder sind auch in der Gemarkung lokalisiert.
BTW: Für eine Medienverwaltung ist ein Wiki der totale Mist … 🤦
LG/A Syntaxys (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
So bin ich über die Jahre auch vorgegangen (abschauen :-) ). Wenn Du weitere Fragen hast, bin ich gerne behilflich. Nutzerfreundlich finde ich die Kategorien auch nicht wirklich. Zwei Stellschrauben wären für mich: Multi-linguale Kategorien und ein gut sichtbarer Button, mit dem man sich in jeder Kategorie eine "flat list" an Bildern anschauen kann (wäre mMn immer dort hilfreich, wenn es sehr viele und spezifische Unterkategorien gibt). P170 (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Die Technik für multilinguale Kategorien wäre ja schon vorhanden, man könnte das problemlos über SDC abbilden. Letztendlich ist eine Kategorie auch nur eine ID, die man nur von ihrer Benennung trennen müsste. Viel besser fände ich jedoch eine vernünftige Verschlagwortung von Objekten, auch das kann man mit SDC gut abbilden. Zu einem Bild gibt es dann z. B. eine „Tag Cloud“ anhand der man sich durch Schnittmengen hindurchwühlen kann, bzw. sieht, welche Attribute des Objekts am prominentesten sind. Dass ich erst „Rheinzabern“ ins Suchfeld eingeben muss, um alle Bilder zum Begriff gelistet zu bekommen, ist schon ein bissl altbacken. Syntaxys (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-28 G11-0089 Achim-Lammerts NSG-7334-191-Eichtal-Brand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:47, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-28 G11-0095 Achim-Lammerts NSG-7334-191-Eichtal-Brand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-16 G11-IMG0051 Achim-Lammerts Pfälzische-Rheinauen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:34, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taormina BW 2025-04-27 13-18-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 17:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-29 D300-7544 Achim-Lammerts Gemarkung-Kandel-Pfalz-Wegekreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-29 D300-7517 Achim-Lammerts Hayna-Bürgerhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:08, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello,
the image Taormina BW 2025-04-27 13-18-25.jpg is not one of mine! I just made a review of it … Syntaxys (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-29 D300-7538 Achim-Lammerts Erlenbach-Kandel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-21 G11-0590 Achim-Lammerts Leonhardstein-Kreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-13 G11-IMG0034 Achim-Lammerts Erlenbach-Kandel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Halo around the building --LR.127 23:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
I know it's not perfectly sharp because of the shimmer of the summer heat at this distance, but I can't see a halo. Please mark with a note.--Syntaxys 03:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
EDIT: I removed sharpening completly which might forcing a halo around the church tower. The subtle difference in light is already contained in the RAW. --Syntaxys 03:44, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Dr. Thomas Liptak 09:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-01 G11-0107-Pano Achim-Lammerts Evangelische-Kirche-Rheinzabern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-29 D300-7495 Achim-Lammerts Wasserturm-Hatzenbühl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:05, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-05-07 D300-4261 Achim-Lammerts Altrhein-Woerth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2025 – Deutschland – Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme

Beitrag aus dem letzten Jahr der erstmals die Art Lamproderma splendens für Wikipedia dokumentierte.

Hallo Syntaxys/2025/July,

der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2025 in Deutschland ist beendet. Im Rahmen der Kampagne haben 350 Teilnehmende 13.497 Fotos hochgeladen, die bereits über 1.000 Artikel in über 40 Wikipedia-Sprachversionen und Einträge auf Wikidata bebildern. Sämtliche Ergebnisse kannst du hier ansehen.

Um aus diesen Beiträgen die besten Fotos zu finden, läuft bis zum 16. August die Vorjury. Über Unterstützung bei dieser würden wir uns sehr freuen.

Die Siegerfotos werden voraussichtlich am 1. September verkündet.

Am 1. September 2025 startet zudem der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um Kultur- und Baudenkmäler. Fotografiere dafür jetzt schon die passenden Motive.

Noch einmal vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme im Namen des Organisationsteams GPSLeo (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-09-18 3005060-Kriegergedaechtniskapelle-Rheinzabern-Friedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:19, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-28 G11-0098 Achim-Lammerts Sondernheim-Fahnenmast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-05 GX6-194133 Achim-Lammerts Rheinzabern-Alter-Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005-09-23 D100-0022 Achim-Lammerts Schlosspark-Schwetzingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Overall good quality, but the right sphinx is too bright, almost blown out. Can you improve it please? --Екатерина Борисова 04:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I turned the lights down a bit, but the RAW doesn't contain any more drawing. The camera is state of the art from 2002, the sensors didn't have the high dynamic range back then. --Syntaxys 07:53, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
 Comment Please change to the correct category "Category:Sphinxes in Schlossgarten Schwetzingen" --Llez 05:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint - copy/paste error in the template ... --Syntaxys 07:53, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
 Support I think it's good enough now, thanks. --Екатерина Борисова 03:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005-09-23 D100-0033 Achim-Lammerts Schlosspark-Schwetzingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:25, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
 Comment Please change to the correct categories "Category:Apollotempel Schwetzingen" and "Category:Sonnenreliefs am Apollotempel Schwetzingen" --Llez 05:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint - copy/paste error in the template ... --Syntaxys 07:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005-09-23 D100-0035 Achim-Lammerts Schlosspark-Schwetzingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
 Comment Please change to the correct category "Category:Kreuzgang (Moschee Schwetzingen)" --Llez 05:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint - copy/paste error in the template ... --Syntaxys 07:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005-09-23 D100-0029 Achim-Lammerts Schlosspark-Schwetzingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Dr. Thomas Liptak 16:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-07-19 DSC0831 Achim Lammerts Göcklingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-05-09 D300-0279 Achim-Lammerts München-Südfriedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022-05-03 D300-5792 Achim-Lammerts NSG-Bruchbach-Otterbachniederung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2009-06-18 D100-0007 Achim-Lammerts Dürrmiesing-Ruchenköpfe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-30 300-7301 Achim-Lammerts Vogelschutzgebiet-Hördter-Rheinaue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-30 300-7299 Achim-Lammerts Vogelschutzgebiet-Hördter-Rheinaue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support The left side is softer, but overall I still think it is QI --Jakubhal 17:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-30 300-7312 Achim-Lammerts Vogelschutzgebiet-Hördter-Rheinaue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-09 G11-0117 Achim-Lammerts Rheinzabern-von-Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-09 GX6-113946 Achim-Lammerts Katholisches-Pfarrhaus-Rheinzabern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 14:49, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-20 G11-0059 Achim-Lammerts Wörther-Altrhein-Adria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-09 D300-7384 Achim-Lammerts Altrhein-Hörnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-09 D300-7375 Achim-Lammerts VSG-Altrhein-Wörth 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-29 D300-7518 Achim-Lammerts Hayna-Kirche-SW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 13:01, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-06-06 D300-0477 Achim-Lammerts Rülzheim-Almosenkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-09 D300-7558 Achim-Lammerts Rülzheim-Almosenkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-09 D300-7562 Achim-Lammerts Rülzheim-Almosenkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staffelsee 2008-CC-BY-SA SYNTAXYS-Achim-Lammerts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005-09-24 D100 Achim-Lammerts Altrhein-Wörth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-12 D300-7563-Pano Achim-Lammerts Katholisches-Pfarrhaus-Rheinzabern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-10 G11-0119 Achim-Lammerts Jockgrim-Kapelle-Parkring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Strubbl 11:54, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-12 D300-7578 Achim-Lammerts Jockgrim-St-Georg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-12 D300-7586-Pano Achim-Lammerts Jockgrim-St-Georg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 18:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-13 GX6-095330 Achim-Lammerts Kandel-Bahnhof-ZOB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-13 G11-0129 Achim-Lammerts Kandel-Bahnhof-Touristinformation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-12 G11-0127 Achim-Lammerts St-Michael-Rheinzabern-Kirchgarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality now --Berthold Werner 13:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-13 G11-0134 Achim-Lammerts Oberkandel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-26 GX6-073927 Achim-Lammerts Rheinzabern-Taubengarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-26 GX6-070054 Achim-Lammerts Rheinzabern-St-Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI, but would be better without the leaves in the top left corner --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
 Oppose I agree with Poco a poco, or could you remove the blue CAs on those leaves please Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 11:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I removed the leaves, that's better. --Syntaxys 11:58, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:41, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-12 D300-7573 Achim-Lammerts Jockgrim-Hochhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:50, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-26 GX6-070411 Achim-Lammerts Rheinzabern-Hauptstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-26 GX6-080901 Achim-Lammerts Rheinzabern-Hauptstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-13 GX6-101904 Achim-Lammerts Kandel-Waldfriedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Category:User talk archives