Commons:Deletion requests/2025/11/12

November 12

File:LOGO-Landsbjörg StortMerki nytt tomt.png

Copyrighted logo. I suggest moving the file to the Icelandic Wikipedia. Steinninn ♨ 09:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Below COM:TOO, also you haven't addressed why the current license is incorrect. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 16:09, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    I can't see anything in this current license that relates to copyrighted logos of companies. Steinninn ♨ 18:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
    That's not the question. The question is whether this logo can be copyrighted at all. User:Nard the Bard, since nothing is mentioned about COM:TOO Iceland, what makes you sure this is below it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:13, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Elterlein Rittersgruen.jpg

Kein eigenes Werk, sondern Abbildung einer Metallarbeit in einem Innenraum (Kirche). Könnte unter Urheberrecht stehen. GerritR (talk) 12:14, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Die notwendige Schöpfungshöhe dürfte hier nicht erreicht sein. --Devilsanddust (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Das sehe ich anders. Gussformen mus man erst einmal entwerfen und herstellen können. GerritR (talk) 08:53, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Der Text ist definitiv unterhalb der Schöpfungshöhe, es bleibt also nur noch das Wappen, das urheberrechtlich geschützt sein könnte, aber es stammt aus dem Jahr 1514 und ist dementsprechend gemeinfrei. Mit anderen Worten es handelt sich hierbei um COM:DW eines gemeinfreien Werkes. Es ist fraglich, ob das anfertigen der Gussform an sich ausreicht, um ein neues Urheberrecht zu erhalten. Nakonana (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by МПЗ (talk · contribs)

Part of a promo from an affiliated user (see nick). Not in use now. A logo under fake license. Logos can't be own or free.

Bilderling (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

 Keep the truck photos even if they are promotional because the categories attached to the images indicate that they are in scope, plus, Камаз / Kamaz is a very well known car brand/manufacturer with articles across many wiki projects so the vehicle photos are undoubtedly in scope. The EXIF data (where available) also indicates that the photos were all taken with the same camera so that own work can be assumed unless clearly proven otherwise.
As for the logo images, that needs a little bit more digging. In the US the logos would easily qualify as textlogos, but Russia has a comparably low threshold of originality so that the logos would likely need to be in the public domain already to safely host them on Commons. Nakonana (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
The logo is definitely new per the company's website, and the company itself might be out of project scope. It's the only red link under w:ru:МПЗ and the ruwiki article has been deleted for lack of reliable sources and notability, also for a company that has been around this long the number of Google search results is surprisingly very, very low (as in: only their official website). However, I somewhat have to wonder whether Yandex/Dzen search would produce more results.
In any way, the logo probably has to be  Deleteed due to copyright concerns. Nakonana (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep product photos, unless any have to be deleted because the logo is also in the photo (which seems dumb to me). I'm not sure about the images of the logo by itself. As Nakonana says, the logo is simple, but COM:TOO Russia says that logos are "in doubt", and there has been substantial debate about that on these boards. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 21 December 2025 (UTC)