User talk:Mike Peel

Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

File:High Line, New York 2012 07.jpg

File:High Line, New York 2012 07.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:High Line, New York 2012 06.jpg

File:High Line, New York 2012 06.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 569 - Banana plant flower at Palmetum de Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 601 - Centro Internacional de Ferias y Congresos, Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plasmium 21:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 604 - Consolea at Palmetum de Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:48, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 190 - tenement house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good photo, but could do with raising black/shadow level, and possibly a different denoising algorithm or settings. Too much information lost currently for QI in my opinion. --Plasmium 19:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, I've revised the lighting levels, and redone the noise reduction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
 Support I think it looks a lot better than before; cars have better definition now. And with the latest perspective correction I think this is QI. --Plasmium 21:48, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EasyJet Airbus A319 (G-EZDA) @ VLC, October 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 540 - International Brigades Memorial, Jubilee Gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 21:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 839 - Paddington station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 21:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 599 - Auditorio de Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 10:58, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 146 - Monument to Saint John Paul II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 10:48, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)