Commons:Bots/Requests/Revibot (2)
Revibot (talk · contribs) (2)
Operator: -revi (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought:
- Maintenance of own uploads - (such as Special:Diff/140039374)
- Remove redundant tistory.com LR related notice. (such as Special:Diff/139316325)
Automatic or manually assisted: Manually assisted
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Whenever edit is needed
Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 6
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): N
Programming language(s): AWB
— revimsg 11:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Discussion
Test is done using my account. I just need "automatic" edits. — revimsg 11:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Done I can't imagine this being controversial. I've added the bot to the AWB check page. Have a go of some test edits and we can archive this when we've seen it working. --99of9 (talk) 11:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Done some for #2. Currently most of #2-type images are bit controversial so I thought it is not appropriate to remove that line for now. #1 is currently not needed, but that will be mostly category-related things. — revimsg 12:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Will be god idea to use more comprehensible edit summaries. For example, you could specify added category there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll use more descriptive summaries next time. — Revi 15:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Running another automated test for pictures in Category:Uploads by Revi needing check. — Revi 12:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Run complete. — Revi 13:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Definitely edit summaries may be improved. Reference to this request is irrelevant. {{int:filedesc}} is repeated twice, but something like Add licensing header is more descriptive. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- First /* {{int:fliedesc}} */ was automatically created by AWB. And this is description header, but anyway, ok. — Revi 15:32, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Definitely edit summaries may be improved. Reference to this request is irrelevant. {{int:filedesc}} is repeated twice, but something like Add licensing header is more descriptive. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Run complete. — Revi 13:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Yet another test ran yesterday. — Revi 03:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- If it's impossible to convince AWB over subject of edit summaries, I think we should live with that :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, then we can close this request? --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)