Wikimore

13 March 2026

15 March 2026

Deletion requests on 14 March 2026

March 14

File:Game&watch-donkey-kong-2.jpg

The color displays may make this image a derivative work of the copyrighted video game. JudeHalley (talk) 01:02, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep COM:DM also those displays aren't part of the game, they're painted on. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 01:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
I don't see how being "painted on" makes a difference. The cabinet art on a vintage arcade machine is certainly copyrightable, for instance - how is this case different? Omphalographer (talk) 03:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep I do think these are de minimis. However we cut it they are copyrightable, but we're only displaying them in the context of the system as a whole.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: I have recently written about this issue at COM:G&W. JudeHalley (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment One key aspect of DM is if the content in question can be removed or changed without reducing the image's quality. And as the Evan-Amos image is about the console, I can imagine that. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep in this case. The colored fringes are definitely DM. This Copyright Office decision might be slightly relevant. JayCubby (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Jray517 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused AI-generated music.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

these are both in use, the 404 song was used as an updated media example on the suno wiki page (the original example was completely out of date and used chatgpt not suno). And the all my life is used for the example under hybrid music production, it is not ai, it's an example of a human written song utilizing ai vocals on top. No promotion is attached to the files, simply serving a purpose ~2026-16269-81 (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Neither file is in use. Your addition of this music to en:Suno (platform) was reverted at en:Special:Diff/1342088981, and en:Hybrid Production (Music) was deleted yesterday at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid Production (Music). Omphalographer (talk) 01:54, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Portrait of Syed Nazim Hussain Shah.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. (I was unable to find the image on the web site given as the source.) Omphalographer (talk) 01:30, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Steno Museet, Science Museerne, Aarhus Universitet.png

Out of scope: this image was generated or modified using AI. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I have found the original and I have been taking this photo. So it's not generated with AI... — Preceding unsigned comment added by De naturvidenskabelige museer i Aarhus (talk • contribs) 12:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

@De naturvidenskabelige museer i Aarhus: With no metadata? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I uploaded this file by mistake / want it deleted I have uploaded a new file instead — Preceding unsigned comment added by De naturvidenskabelige museer i Aarhus (talk • contribs) 12:25, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and uploader. Merging is also an option. @De naturvidenskabelige museer i Aarhus: I see, File:Steno Museet i Aarhus ved solformørkelsesevent 29. marts 2025.jpg supersedes this file, and has metadata. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:48, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Verkaufsstelle Marke Bölck.png

Out of scope: this image is a modern AI-generated image, not a 1920 logo. If this image was generated based on a real, freely licensed graphic, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

The image was made based on the original logo. The original logo was uploadet now. Input Zoom (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

The "original logo" you uploaded is also AI-generated. What's going on here precisely? Omphalographer (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Well I removed the backgrond. If you feel better with it, i dont mind to upload the ugly version. Input Zoom (talk) 21:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I uploaded it. Input Zoom (talk) 21:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Author photo of Raymond Carver on Cathedral (1983).png

It's difficult to see, but there's a copyright notice on the bottom left corner of this image that names the publisher. prospectprospekt (talk) 02:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete: did not notice that when I uploaded it myself, its very obscured on the one full photo of the dust jacket I could find, but nevertheless a valid concern. Photo is probably a work-for-hire of the publisher in this case. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 12:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo Ejército del Bolivia.jpg

El título está mal, además subí otro archivo igual con información más detallada Espbol (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:168th Street stair.JPG

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Blurred the ad. S5A-0043 🚎 03:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Ooligan (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Canal Street Entrance.JPG

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Blurred the ad. S5A-0043 🚎 03:33, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Ooligan (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Nakhla50 (talk · contribs)

Categorised under Category:Painters from the United Kingdom and Category:Painters from Iraq but neither COM:FOP UK nor COM:FOP Iraq cover 2D artworks, which would make this a copyvio.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Odéon 4 (métro Paris) par Cramos.JPG

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Demande atteignant les limites de l'application aveugle des règles de la "non-liberté de diaporama" en France. Des pubs, il y a en a dans toutes les stations de métro. Faut-il pour autant les supprimer ? Cramos78 (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Keep after cropping or blurring. File is in use and would remain useful. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Ala Bashir

No COM:FOP Iraq; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:A (86).JPG for the last image (The Union.jpg was the same monument), as well as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nakhla50.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 03:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Times Square - panoramio (29).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. De minimis. Unavoidable inclusion which is not the main purpose of the image (point 3). IronGargoyle (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Yuzuru Hanyu TV Asahi Advertisement Pillars 1 - JR Central Tokyo Station.png

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: There was a discussion back in 2022/23 regarding FoP and copyright for multiple images that showed advertisement banners in Japan. Most of the images got deleted for the reason mentioned above (no FoP for 2D work in Japan), however this image and another one were exempt from deletion, because the wrapped advertisement was deemed distored enough to not violate copyright. Similar cases can be found in this category: Wrap advertising in Japan. If required, I can search for the respective discussion from three years ago. Henni147 (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Alberta ielā 12 20120728-10.JPG

The building was completed in 1903 by Konstantīns Pēkšēns (1859–1928) and Eižens Laube (1880–1967). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2038 A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Question This building was completed on territory of Russian empire, which was not party to the Berne Convention and Latvia is very likely not legal successor of the empire, so are you shure what copyright law of Latvia applies to Russian empire works what published on Latvian territory? SomeFancyUsername (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Architecture country of origin becomes that of successor nations, per Template:PD-RusEmpire. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

File:HIMANSHI❤️.jpg

New version of it was been uploaded remove it Shubham2525 (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Loch Melfort Hotel & Asknish Bay drone shot 2026.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Minna Sora no Shita as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Sure looks in-scope to me. The fact that they have an interest in the property does not violate any Commons rule. Jmabel ! talk 05:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Loch Melfort Hotel - Sunset over Asknish Bay.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Minna Sora no Shita as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Sure looks in-scope to me. The fact that they have an interest in the property does not violate any Commons rule. Jmabel ! talk 05:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Loch Melfort Hotel - Arduaine House.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Minna Sora no Shita as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Sure looks in-scope to me. The fact that they have an interest in the property does not violate any Commons rule. Jmabel ! talk 05:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Елена Князева.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Target destroyed (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Таймураз Фидаров «Родина».jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Target destroyed (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Фидаров, Таймураз.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Target destroyed (talk) 07:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Сослан Бестаев ЛДПР.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake Target destroyed (talk) 07:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblema Internapoli.jpg

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:48, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

License changed from PD-Italia to PD-textlogo on March 8, after adding No permission ZioNicco (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Lydia Schulgina.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Komarof as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 07:48, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by B Adventures (talk · contribs)

All claimed as own work, but every file I check turns up on a different gun website or forum from a decade or more prior to upload at Commons. I've already flagged a couple for speedy deletion, but some examples from from the remaining ones: File:Colt MARS Program 3 7.62x39mm, 5.45x39mm, 5.56x45mm NATO, 5.56x30mm MARS, 5.7x28mm, 4.6x30mm, 9x30mm MARS, 9mm NATO.jpg is taken from a 2009 Small Arms Review article, File:John Taffin circa 2023.jpg is from Guns Magazine, File:TheARguy TCM AR Mags 5.jpg and others are product photos from thearguy.com store website.

Belbury (talk) 08:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Hoffest (talk · contribs)

Unused graphics, imported from the German-language Wikipedia, created by a user with an indefinite block, Special:CentralAuth/Hofffest. Probably nonsense, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Terrestrische Braunsche Röhre.jpg.

זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 08:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Big Ass Lake outline.jpg

Uploader’s request Versions111 (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Big Ass Lake with black outline.jpg

Uploader request Versions111 (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Вид на Федотову косу с "Чёртова колеса" - panoramio - Руслан Селезнёв.jpg

damaged file, while non-damaged photo is available in Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Вид_на_Федотову_косу_с_"Чёртова_колеса"_-_panoramio_-_Руслан_Селезнёв_(2).jpg Bestalex (talk) 09:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Basith635 (talk · contribs)

The original author's licensing information is unknown. I checked on wayback machine.

Copied from Facebook. See Metadata ("FBMD" is MetaData added by Facebook.)

File:Baithul-Salam-Masjidh.jpg

I suspect other files as well, but I couldn’t come to a conclusion. --Voncercue (talk) 09:51, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Shajareh Tayyebeh school in Minab photos from Mehr (12).jpg

Nominating for deletion. The authenticity of this image is doubtful. It originates from Mehr News Agency, a semi-official Iranian outlet, and given the circulation of AI-generated and manipulated images related to the conflict, the possibility that the image is AI-generated or otherwise manipulated cannot be ruled out. The file also depicts an extremely graphic scene of a dead child with exposed organs. Due to the questionable provenance and the highly graphic nature of the image, community review is requested regarding whether this file is appropriate for Wikimedia Commons. Gharouni (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep, image is COM:INUSE in multiple wikis. No explanation or evidence provided to indicate this image is "AI-generated or otherwise manipulated". Commons can host images that are "extremely graphic" as long as the image is in-scope. In addition of being in-use, I think this image is educationally useful because it helps document a historic event by depicting the casualties of the en:2026 Iran war. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep - No reason or justifcation that the image is AI-generated or otherwise manipulated cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the fact that it is a semi-official Iranian outlet is not grounds for exclusion. Lf8u2 (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. This image has been used by news sources such as Reuters and The Washington Post, confirming its validity. How graphic it is does not matter as long as it pertains to encyclopedic information, which it does. Hsnkn (talk) 04:06, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete: below are archives pages for mehr news agency photo pages for that specific date but there is not such file(s) on the archive

as you type telegram page title of "تصویری ‌غم‌انگیز از جنایت امروز آمریکایی-صهیونی در دبستان دخترانه میناب" in google there is no result coming than this one

most probably file delete by Meher News from its website and net and screen shot from aparat

only pictures that published for this event by sister website "Tasnim" are this files

Conclusion: File is AI-generated and fake[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 04:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

They posted other photos here https://t.me/mehrnews/352907 and give this link https://www.mehrnews.com/x3bvpR

How to access photos on Mehr News website they are never loading for me now even when the site works

999

REAL 💬 ⬆ 15:04, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete The image appears to be AI-generated. If one examines the debris and the shapes of the objects, there are unnatural and possibly repeated patterns. The relationship between the body and the surrounding objects also appears physically unusual. In addition, a significant portion of the image is obscured by another person in the foreground, even though the photographer could have taken a wider photograph; this is not evident here. Only limited body elements (mainly a hand) are clearly visible, and the way the body appears to emerge from the debris does not seem consistent with how such a situation would typically appear in reality. As mentioned by another user, there does not appear to be a matching image published on the website of Mehr News Agency. Furthermore, the image is attributed to a source associated with the government of the Iran, and the agency has previously faced criticism regarding image manipulation. More importantly, it is unclear how we can verify that this photograph actually depicts the claimed event (the reported attack on the school). There is no clear evidence confirming the location or the authenticity of the scene. Gharouni (talk) 07:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep None of the arguments presented above conclusively prove that the image was generated by AI.

First of all, we are not dealing with a single photograph, but with a series of at least two images. Check the file history and compare the versions from March 1 by @999real and from March 9 by @Beao.

These are similar shots taken within a short time frame, showing crushed and twisted fingers arranged in exactly the same way (elements that are particularly difficult for AI to generate). Likewise, fragments of rubble are arranged in exactly the same configuration. It is easy to distinguish pieces of concrete (sharp edges) from natural aggregate (smooth pebbles). The only place where one might suspect some form of alteration is the area where a Mehr News Agency watermark was likely removed.

In the image, the physics and lighting are consistent — light, shadows, and dust behave naturally.

Background elements that are blurred also do not contain any “AI artifacts.” We can see a blurred fragment of a shoe, yet it still has realistic laces, a sole, tread, and naturally formed folds and dirt on the material. The rescuer’s face is blurred and seen from an unusual angle, yet it still has an accurate and realistic profile, with clearly defined eyelashes, eyebrows, nose, and hair. The rescuer's face is the only object that moves significantly between frames, which exactly corresponds to the real spatial situation (position in the foreground).

The argument that the photographer could have framed the shot differently is, in my opinion, unfounded. We should remember that the photo was not taken in a studio, but during an intense rescue operation and the search for potentially surviving individuals.

The hand is shown in foreshortening, which gives it an unusual appearance, but only at first glance. The girl’s body is likely lying face down. A fragment of a sleeve is visible just above the elbow. The head is either under the rubble or has been severed. In the area where the back should be, there is a fragment of some fabric or material. It resembles children’s backpacks seen in other images .

The texture of the skin on the fingers is clearly visible, including the pattern of lines at the joints and dirt under the fingernails. The hand is completely anatomically correct (aside from actual physical damage). The wounds and blood covered with dust also look entirely realistic.

The fact that the rest of the body is not visible is nothing unusual. It is buried under debris or may have been torn apart by an explosion and is simply no longer there.

This type of framing is characteristic of journalistic photographs of victims, such as the well-known image of the body of Iryna Filkina from Bucha. This framing captures the individual character of the victim (a small child in this case), while not emphasizing the brutality of a mutilated face or torn torso, making it suitable for public display.

The Tasnim website mentioned contains only photos from victims’ funeral, so it is not surprising that this image does not appear there.

The photo should definitely be kept as there is nothing to suggest it is fake. YazJazz (talk) 22:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

@YazJazz Thanks for sharing your opinion. However, I still believe this is an AI-generated image. What I forgot to mention earlier is that, when looking at the boot, it’s hard to believe that someone could realistically be standing on top of the body. That’s how it appears to me in this image. All the images in the file are the same; the only differences are cropping, watermark removal, or zooming. Gharouni (talk) 11:59, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep no indication whatsoever of the picture being AI-generated. The fact that the image is graphic or originates from an Iranian news outlet does not provide sufficient grounds for exclusion. It has also been used by RS like Reuters and the Washington Post, which indicates that these outlets have verified its authenticity before publication. Paprikaiser (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Stolperstein voor Simon Groenberg (Utrecht).jpg

De afbeelding klopt niet met de beschrijving, hij hoort bij een andere persoon Kattiel (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Pellestrina city view 2021 (9).jpg

unscharf, nur ein Glas im Vordergrund Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

1. Nie jest rozmazane. To jest efekt bokeh. 2. Przedstawia Aperol. Konkretne pojęcie encyklopedyczne (25 języków, lista IBA). 3. Aperol ujęty jest w naturalnym włoskim krajobrazie, in situ. MOs810 (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Blason famille .svg

Erroneous coat of arms (the crescent should be white not yellow), with a bad file name, superseded by File:Blason famille Potrelot de Grillon.svg that the same user uploaded approx. 1 month later instead of overwriting the existing file and requesting for it to be renamed.
Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ajax151 (talk · contribs)

This site has had several false claims of CC-0 from the subjects of the images - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Humping Iron", Kellie Everts, May 1977.jpg where it is completely clear that the subject cannot give a free license for an image that appeared in Playboy. I doubt very much that the subjects of these images actually have the right to freely license the images.

File:MissOlympia1980.jpg
File:Kellie Everts, Real People, 1979.jpg Keep No copyright registration for this publicity still. --RAN (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
File:KELLIE EVERTS 1978.jpg Keep No copyright registration for this publicity still. --RAN (talk) 00:50, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
File:HA5V8068.jpg

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per above. Yann (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep all of the above listed items due the fact that permission is explicitly given in the source links themselves (for the ones that have source links), and for the one item that still lacks a clear source link, please allow at least a little more time to locate such missing link if possible before proceeding with deletion. To the best of my knowledge, all of these items currently under discussion are public domain (though I do understand the difficulty in proving a negative). And with all due respect, please note that previously deleted items such as the earlier Playboy picture (which I concede was an honest mistake on my part which I do apologize for, in terms of incomplete/insufficient permissions per the nuances of Wikipedia Commons standards) are not relevant to the ones currently in question, as none of them belong to any magazine or similar publication. I rest my case. Thank you very much for your understanding and consideration. 😊 Ajax151 (talk) 01:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

We have seen that the source web site allows blatantly false claims. Although the subject may have a license to use the image, it is very unusual for the photographer to allow a subject to freely license an image, so that must be proven with more evidence than a claim on a known problematic site. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Unproven, uncertain, unclear, vague, and thus potentially incorrect claims on the source website? Perhaps. Not "blatantly false" though. And most of the claims on the site thus far has been at least largely true from what I gather. Ajax151 (talk) 11:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep File:KELLIE EVERTS 1978.jpg No copyright registration. The others we need proof that they are not under an active copyright, by seeing where they were originally published or if they came from a non copyrighted publicity image. If you need them displayed in the article, you can load them to Wikipedia under "fair use", but I think only one fair use is allowed per article. Check at English Wikipedia.--RAN (talk) 00:50, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Richard. That makes sense. And it looks like the remaining three are still currently under or pending review as well. Ajax151 (talk) 11:17, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Wouldn't it matter where it was published? If it was published in a magazine that renewed copyright for its issues, I wouldn't see why it would be in the public domain. Nighfidelity (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Someone found another File:Kellie Everts publicity photo by James J. Kriegsmann (1909-1994).jpg where there was no copyright registration. Generally publicity photos were not copyrighted until 1989, with exceptions, CBS and NBC had some publicity images with copyright notices as early as 1960 and the copyright notice was on the front in the lower margin. Even then they failed to register those images for copyright. It was required between 1978 and February 1989. If you can find more like that, uncropped, showing the margins, then it is easier to show that they are not under an active copyright. Keep looking and you may find more. Kriegsmann may have made more images. --RAN (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Indeed. And thank you and whoever else for finding this one as well 😊 Ajax151 (talk) 02:04, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep File:Kellie Everts, Real People, 1979.jpg Keep No copyright registration for this publicity still. The show, Real People, is copyrighted but I cannot find any copyright registration for publicity stills for the show. It was required between 1978 and February 1989. This is similar to what we found for CBS, NBC, and ABC shows, they did not register publicity images, even when they had a copyright notice on the image. --RAN (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Excellent, just two more to go, thanks 😊 Ajax151 (talk) 02:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Chakram.jpg

COM:NOTUSED Sushiya (talk) 14:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Fridtjof-Nansen-Realschule-Grundschule-Ernst-Reuter-Straße-4-Muenchen-Wiki-2880px.jpg

Meine Datei, verwinzigt hier eingestellt, und kein Dank, bäääh Fentriss (talk) 14:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Original vom autor, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mueernstreuterstr4032019.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D

File:Constantine II of the Hellenes (Colorised).jpg

The licensing tag here is anything but correct, unfortunately. Quite doubtful, at the same time, whether an official portrait like this one is free of copyrights, indeed, or not... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep No valid reason for deletion. --HaT59 (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@HaT59: The copyrights claim, here, is clearly wrong. It's an official portrait taken in more or less a specific date, covered by copyrights. Is there any proof that these copyrights have now expired? 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 18:27, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Paul of Greece (Colorised).jpg

The licensing tag here is anything but correct, unfortunately. Quite doubtful, at the same time, whether an official portrait like this one is free of copyrights, indeed, or not... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep No valid reason for deletion. --HaT59 (talk) 18:05, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@HaT59: The copyrights claim, here, is clearly wrong. It's an official portrait taken in more or less a specific date, covered by copyrights. Is there any proof that these copyrights have now expired? 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 18:27, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WIKITONGUES- Sandra speaking English and Guyanese Creole.webm

Hi, Kristen from Wikitongues here. This speaker requested the licensing be CC-by-NC, making it ineligible to be added to Commons. Thank you! Ktchernes (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Kept: CC-BY-SA licence was added at upload and previously verified. CC-BY-SA is not revocable. --Stifle (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

File:WIKITONGUES- Sandra speaking English and Guyanese Creole.webm

The archived versions of the YouTube page do not show a CC license. Could the bot have misdetected the license? JaydenChao (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bogreudell or someone else from meta:Wikitongues might be able to clarify. TheFeds 10:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Film Schellebelle 1919 soundtracks Jazzband De Katjes.jpg

This file is a picture from a recent book, written by a person who has just recently passed away (https://www.rouwcentrumvanbever.be/getdocument.ashx?id=250f4cb8-eb74-4a5c-8ef4-b8b83b56159f). I cannot find any evidence anywhere the uploader holds the copyright on either the book or the picture depicted on this page in the book, and believe this image infringes on copyright. Lottebelice (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I am the grandson of the book's author and the picture was uploaded with permission and blessing of the author's daughter (who is his sole heir) as part of an effort to create a wikipedia article for him. This is was a request he made on his death bed. ZettaZon (talk) 15:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Permission from the author's daughter via COM:VRT will be necessary. Jcb (talk) 06:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Der Fall der Johanna Dolder 1764.pdf

Out of scope: plain text. This is certainly not an authentic 1764 document. Omphalographer (talk) 23:38, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hallo Omphalographer

Der damalige Leutpriester Huober von 1764 hat "der Fall der Johanna Dolder" im Sterbebuch von St. Stephan Beromünster verfasst (Original Dokument).

1940 hat Josef Wallimann das Original von 1764 übersetzt und im Buch "Die Bürgergeschlechter von Beromünster" publiziert.

File:Der Fall der Johanna Dolder 1764.pdf habe ich gestaltet. Der Text ist von 1940.

Viele Grüsse Zangenfabrik1820 Zangenfabrik1820 (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Der Fall der Johanna Dolder 1764.pdf

Kopie vom Original. Zangenfabrik1820 (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Die Knochen eines Hingerichteten.pdf

copyright violation; no permission by author/writer. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Die Knochen eines Hingerichteten.pdf

Keine Lizenz. Zangenfabrik1820 (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by LasInviernas (talk · contribs)

Clearly not own work.

Strakhov (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per PCP, unless uploader can provide a permissible source --Enyavar (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Maradona graffiti on a garage gate in Naples.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in Italy. Günther Frager (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

The mural was painted by the living artist Juan Pablo Gimenez in 2024 (see here). Friniate (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Максим Мальков (talk · contribs)

Post-revolutionary works of Moisej Nappelbaum (d:Q1781790) are not free until 2033, see Category:Moisej Nappelbaum.

Komarof (talk) 15:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sing-Akademie 06.jpg

The actual children's choir is obscured and out of focus in the background. I don't see any added value in this image and would like to delete it, especially considering the young child in the foreground. I am aware that the presence of children alone is not a ground for deletion; however, since I see no clear benefit and the primary subject is almost entirely hidden, I see no reason to upload uncensored images of children here. Lukas Beck (talk) 15:51, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:EuroLeague logo.svg

Uncertain whether the logo uploaded here has "uniqueness, individuality, and distinguishability" (English for "singularidad, individualidad, y distinguibilidad") for copyright protection under the Spanish law (COM:TOO Spain). After all, the organisation body is headquartered in Spain, so its logo should be subject to that law. George Ho (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Another reason to delete the logo is, even if deemed unoriginal enough for further protection, its copyright in Spain as a typographical composition there (click/tap here). Those typographical compositions have twenty-five years of copyright protection... but as such. Since it was first released in 2016, the logo would be copyrighted until the exact end of 2041. In other words, at least fifteen more years from now. George Ho (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep "simple geometric shapes or text". --heylenny (^talk/_edits) 12:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Especially in Spain? George Ho (talk) 16:49, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:National Museum of the History of Ukraine 20190503.jpg

This file shows the building of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine, a copyrighted architectural work by architect Yosyp Yuriiovych Karakis (Joseph Karakis, 16 May 1902 – 23 February 1988). This commercially-licensed photo is copyright infringements. While Ukraine has now some form of freedom of panorama since December 2022, the Ukrainian government only gave a non-commercial FOP that is not OK for Wikimedia. Venzz (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Traktorendemo Berlin 2019.jpg

Unknown author, very low resolution. It is implausible that this image is copyright-free, and I would like to be able to verify that claim. However, no information regarding the image's source is provided. The whole thing seems a bit suspicious, which is why I am requesting its deletion. Lukas Beck (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:GrapheneOS phone logo.png

Unused; just appears to be a screenshot of a secton of the GrapheneOS website Spiral6800 (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Tordera 420DSC 0021 (49908544877).jpg

COM:SCOPE, pointless image imported by bot Qualitätssicherung (talk) 16:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Tordera 420IMG 20200312 115904 (49907731368).jpg

Very likely COPYVIO of logo/text; also SCOPE?; imported image by bot Qualitätssicherung (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Tordera 420DSC 0029 (49908544742).jpg

SCOPE, imported by bot. Qualitätssicherung (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Copa del Rey por M+.png

Hopelessly blurred Rathfelder (talk) 16:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. File in use on multiple pages. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sucrose-inkscape.svg

Per this Help Desk post and the talk page, this image has a mistake: an H is missing at the bottom of C5 (see this image for numbering). The file is in use, but looking through its uses in ENWP, each seems to discuss standard Sucrose rather than highlighting the error, so the usage of a file with the error does not seem to be intentional.

I propose deleting this file as COM:REDUNDANT and redirecting to File:Sucrose structure formula inkscape.svg which is nearly identical and without the error (not sure if there's a better way to redirect the existing uses). Consigned (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Missing an H at C5 Daja.lama (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@Daja.lama Is that supposed to be a !vote? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:German Empire Flag Emoji.png

this image which is owned by google just upsidedown CubanoBoi (talk) 03:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Keep, falls under {{PD-ineligible}} --Matr1x-101^{Pinging me doesn't hurt!} {user - talk? - useless contributions} 21:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Kept: per User:Matr1x-101, nothing proprietary or original here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

File:German Empire Flag Emoji.png

This icon is from the Google Noto Color Emoji set from Android 8.0. All the user did is flip it and extend it to make it their own. This isn't an original design. Sacherra official (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Wikimedia Commons logo variants via Stable Diffusion by Ziko van Dijk

Out of scope: unused AI-generated images --JaydenChao (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete most or all of these. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:2024-05 ZvD SD variations Wikimedia Commons logo 01.png and File:2024-05 ZvD SD variations Wikimedia Commons logo 15.png may be worth keeping. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:29, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep The ones used on Commons as well as File:2024-05 ZvD SD variations Wikimedia Commons logo 15.png which is about the idea/proposal(?)/concept of a monument/… for/about Commons. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

I have never seen any such proposal suggested anywhere, and I don't see any reason we should keep that image. Omphalographer (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep the in-use ones;

Delete the rest Dronebogus (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete all: We only really need one AI image to illustrate the main subject of COM:AI, and I think that one should be File:2024-05 ZvD SD variations Wikimedia Commons logo 06.png since it's already in use at Korean Wikipedia and not up for deletion. The rest lack educational value and should be deleted. EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 03:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

{{delete|reason=Why do we even need them isn't the main Logo already in off for Wikimedia? We dont need to do exceptions.|subpage=Files in Category:Wikimedia Commons logo variants via Stable Diffusion by Ziko van Dijk|year=2026|month=April|day=18}}

~2026-23969-72 (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Jean-Luc Mélenchon 2026.png

The website linked says "Tous droits réservés" although the legal section specifies nothing about the copyright of media files. There is no mention of a CC0 license in the description of the YouTube video from which the image originates. Procrastineur49 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ethel Caterham.png

Questionable low res image of the world's oldest woman, possibly AI generated and with no EXIF. In every other photo I can see online she is seated in a chair or wheelchair, but here she is apparently standing comfortably without support. Belbury (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

I believe it is AI because it's weird it's only appearing now, lack of detail from photographer, and the fact that it's just a sloppified version of this image. You can also see the floor has weird patterns that don't look very natural and her dress has very weird intersections at the flower petals. Sneakysasquatchfan (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nomination. Katzrockso (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ethel Caterham.png

Same as the previous upload of a file with this name: a questionable low res image of the world's oldest woman, possibly AI generated and with no EXIF. Subject is depicted in the same green dress as the previous upload, which was an AI edit of a photo of Caterham in a blue dress, and the uploader again claims to have visited her in a nursing home. Belbury (talk) 17:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per the previous discussion, this image is just more AI slop Sneakysasquatchfan (talk) 05:00, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:يوسف زغبة.png

صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays 🗣 18:18, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Port de Stoclkholm.jpg

Cover drawing by Christophe Poot claimed as "own work" Arjayay (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

If so, I made a mistake. It is of course obviously his. But he released it under a Wikimedia Commons licence for free use. I thought that was what I had indicated for the file. The amibe (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Irina Konstantinovna Archipova - collezione Tino Barindelli.tif

The uploader brought here a long and fascinating history about the transfer of ownership of this particular paper postcard, but the problem is it has nothing to do with copyright. Neither Irina Arkhipova herself, who received one of the postcard copies, nor anyone else who came into its possession, became the photographer who took the photo. Then the uploader's next false claim arises that "the country of origin of this photograph is Italy" (well, yes, in Italy, all photographs are published with captions in Russian). In fact, this is an ordinary souvenir postcard, published in a print run of about 3,000 copies in the USSR for sale at w:Soyuzpechat newsstands. Fortunately for the uploader, there's still a little chance the photo will remain kept, since, judging by the logo, this postcard was issued by the LTB printing house in Riga, Latvian SSR (see other postcards from the same printing house: , , ). But, as we know, mass-market printing houses didn't produce high-quality professional photographs for postcards themselves, but rather received them centrally, in accordance with all the rules of the planned economy, from Moscow. So now, according to the COM:EVID policy, the uploader must prove that the image complies with copyright laws in Latvia and Russia, and, best of all, make some effort to find the name of the photographer, who most likely hasn't been dead for more than 70 years and the exact year of it's first legal publication. Komarof (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Daniel S. Schmid (talk · contribs)

Media/promo photos. Permission needed from the photographer via COM:VRT.

If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).

→

Consigned (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ohlopkov and Kvachantiradze.jpg

Image seems to be «improved» by AI. Original photo: https://pobeda.nlrs.ru/gallery-of-fame/famous-sniper-exhibition/assets/images/unnamed-4-512x339.jpg Msgevans00 (talk) 19:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Minutes of the Kawthoolei Bloc Political Meeting hold at SHO on 02-04(1956.pdf

This work was deleted at Wikisource recently as a likely copyright violation. Not an edict of a government. My understanding is that this was a coalition meeting written by an armed insurgency group in Burma. So as it was published in 1956, it would've been URAA'd because it became public domain in Myanmar in 2006, after the 1996 URAA date. The file was marked, almost certainly incorrectly, as CC-BY 4.0. SnowyCinema (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Dalat International School logo.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 19:31, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:ICEOUT3.jpg

Possible COM:WEBCOPYVIO. Google Images finds a hit on instagram from Feb 7 2026 at https://www.instagram.com/p/DUe_tKZlmtj/ though it seems to be down. The cached image on Google has a larger field of view than this one (can see the house to the right) - it seems like this may be a screenshot or a photo of a photo, note that EXIF shows creation on Feb 18. If the photo is the uploader's own image, please provide permission to COM:VRT. Consigned (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Irina Konstantinovna Archipova, 1960 - collezione Tino Barindelli.tif

This is more suitable for a speedy deletion, but let's go with the option of regular one, so that the uploader carefully reads everything he wrote and learns to distinguish between ownership and copyright. False description and PD rationale provided, this has nothing common with Italy. This is a work of well-known Soviet photographer Evgeny Petrovich Umnov (1919–1975): . His works are not free until 2054. Komarof (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Debapriya Mukhopadhyay Vision Research Institute and Foundation Logo.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 19:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:2024 CA-45 election results.svg

This file is a duplicate of File:2022 House Elections California 45th.svg. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Demande Speciale Office Crop.jpg

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 19:56, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:DepositDirect.png

Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 19:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:(m=eaSaaTbWx)(mh=EkZbJu4oiQuKKcDo)0.jpg

COM:PORN, out-of-scope Streetlampguy301 (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep High quality photo--Trade (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

File:(m=eaSaaTbWx)(mh=aPdI7cJF1tlHf1L6)0.jpg

COM:PORN, out-of-scope Streetlampguy301 (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A photograph of Turdaly Tokbaev taken during his lifetime.jpg

Dubious PD rationale, grounded on the life term of an author, who is unknown to the uploader. More careful evidence needed. Komarof (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment undelete in 2075, due to Kyrgyzstan uses 50 p.m.a duration. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 13:36, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:NS-2016 En la linea 5 de Metro de Santiago.jpg

File:C Cardinale-H Fahmy-M Amin.jpg

Not enough informations about the source. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Diocese of Reval.png

Created for use on en.wiki (which doesn't allow AI images), and doesn't look like the source coat of arms. Unused, should not be used, so out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

You are welcome to help make it better ~2026-16286-68 (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

If it's against the rules of en.wiki, then it is understandable. But the image is accurate enough (second image on: https://heraldry-wiki.com/wiki/Diocese_of_Reval). KKisto (talk) 08:17, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Should be allowed to use on et.wikipedia ~2026-16332-81 (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Is it not the case of many images used in Wikipedia (including coats of arms), that it is intentional to convey a stylized and simplified image, so to speak - if an exact historical match is not available or cannot be used? Should be suitable for Commons. KKisto (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

I know very little about how Catholic coats of arms work, but both the scarf and the diagonal cross don't appear in the source images. So I'm assuming that the AI just made those up. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

The scarf should be clearly visible in the reference picture, but the standardized version shows its position in a different place. The standardized versions also uses both the diagonal staff and the cross. KKisto (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:AmericaFest 2025 - Zeitgeist 09.jpg

Derivative work of the original video broadcast, copyright status is unclear. Komarof (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

+1, delete --Isderion (talk) 21:58, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Detta, templomkerti Nepomuki Szent János-szobor 2022 04 AI.png

Unused AI "upscale" that gets several of the details from the original photo wrong. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Could you please elaborate on your reasoning? Which specific details do you mean? As I noted on the description page, the drawing style is intentional so that it is immediately clear this is not a photo. However, it still provides details that were otherwise obscured by other objects in the original scene. Pasztilla (talk) 07:27, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Nógrád, Nepomuki Szent János-szobor AI 01.png

Unused AI "upscale" that gets several of the details from the original photo wrong. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Could you please elaborate on your reasoning? Which specific details do you mean? As I noted on the description page, the drawing style is intentional so that it is immediately clear this is not a photo. However, it still provides details that were otherwise obscured by other objects in the original scene. So if I myself spend an hour to draw the same, that would be accepted, but if I accelaret the work with AI, that is not good enough? Pasztilla (talk) 07:27, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Iva Jovic 20250914.png

+ File:Iva Jovic 20250914 (cropped).png

Delete – No metadata. All uploads of Pedeshtrian were deleted as copyright violations. Above all, it is a position directly on the court, for a professional photographer with accreditation. Kacir (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sárvár, Nepomuki Szent János-szobor 2025 02 AI.png

Unused AI "upscale" that gets several of the details from the original photo wrong. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Slopification Dronebogus (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep Could you please elaborate on your reasoning? Which specific details do you mean? As I noted on the description page, the drawing style is intentional so that it is immediately clear this is not a photo. However, it still provides details that were otherwise obscured by other objects in the original scene.

Pasztilla (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/2026/03/14

March 14

Files uploaded by Jray517 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Nakhla50 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Ala Bashir

Files uploaded by B Adventures (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Hoffest (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Basith635 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Ajax151 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by LasInviernas (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Максим Мальков (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Wikimedia Commons logo variants via Stable Diffusion by Ziko van Dijk

Files uploaded by Daniel S. Schmid (talk · contribs)