| |
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Nayan j Nath (talk) on 2026-04-14 07:49 (UTC) |
Scope:
Goru Bihu |
Reason:
Goru Bihu has always been an important part of Assamese culture, especially in highlighting the bond between people and their cattle. However, due to the decline in cattle domestication ,this age old tradition is slowly losing its place and may fade away in the coming years if the trend continues. -- Nayan j Nath (talk) |
Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Best in scope and Used. -AjayDas (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The category is fine. The scope is too long: comments should be posted separately in the "reason" field. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment If the category is appropriate, a longer scope should not be an issue, as it can be edited.-Nayan j Nath (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment A simple scope of Goru Bihu would be good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment It was edited to keep the scope limited to Goru Bihu only.-Nayan j Nath (talk) 16:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
|
| Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 17:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
 View promotion |
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-04-16 16:43 (UTC) |
Scope:
Auguste Louvrier de Lajolais |
Reason:
New in Commons and unique in scope. We had a category of some works of this french painter, but no portraits of him. Now it is added in Wikidata and articles. -- Jebulon (talk) |
Support Goodo restoration. (I have a few in progress myself, including of my old nemesis the glass negative) JayCubby (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. What do you want to do (different) with glass negatives ? I have some in my own personal collection, but I use them after transformation in positives.--Jebulon (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- If there is a fleck left in a photo I'm restoring, I feel obligated to remove it. Glass negatives pick up lots of flecks and as such take a bit longer than positive prints. (I have no plate negatives, unless you count the 1880s tintype I picked up at a junkshop). JayCubby (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
|
| Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-04-17 16:44 (UTC) |
Scope:
Charles de Ribbe |
Reason:
Alone in scope, restored because very damaged. Restoration was tedious. This man was an historian of Provence, a sociologist and an agronomist. -- Jebulon (talk) | |
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
|
| Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 17:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Aciarium ⚒ (talk) on 2026-04-18 18:43 (UTC) |
Scope:
Sommerblumenschau Pavilion (Blumengärten Hirschstetten) |
Reason:
I think this is the best image to show the Sommerblumenschau Pavilion, symbol of the Flower Gardens Hirschstetten. -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) | |
Comment It's not being used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Best in scope and useful. Promoting it as VI will encourage use by some Wikimedia project. --Tagooty (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I don't think VI often encourages use except when the VI image is best among many. It is best to use it on a wiki before VI. If you cannot find a wiki to use it, then I suspect it is not valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment The 6 VI criteria only require that the image be the best in its suitably generic scope, not that it be already used. I don't think the onus should be on the nominator/photographer to find a project to use the image, as long as the 6 criteria are met. --Tagooty (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Archaeodontosaurus: @Tagooty: @Charlesjsharp: I have added the image to a corresponding article on DE:WP. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks. Not being used is not a reason to oppose, but I will generally not support an image that is not used. To me, looking at an VI image that is not used is usually a waste of my time and it should be the nominator's responsibility to show that the image can be used. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Support ok now... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
|
| Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|