Commons:Deletion requests/2026/06/21

June 21

Files in Category:Oliver Tree

Metadata states "Copyright 2019 All Rights Reserved"

TansoShoshen (talk) 01:57, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment is there any reason to think the uploader is not the author/photographer? Possible failure not to reset generic EXIF notice not a deletion reason by itself. Note: Uploader apparently not active since 2022. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

File:MIA-MBJ (22).jpg

low quality CubanoBoi (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

if someone thinks its good enough to be on here then keep, if not then delete for low quality. CubanoBoi (talk) 03:57, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Milady Horákové 25 (7337).jpg

better image avialable, see File:Milady Horákové 25 Sgraffito (detail 7).jpg Gampe (talk) 05:14, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Sziki2 DNy.png

there is aother version of that is a JPG and this one is not is use anywhere Valkais (talk) 08:15, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

disuse is not an valid rationale here. usually png are higher quallity than jpegs Adtonko (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Vayer ordi watts.jpg

Poissible copyvio: Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, No url in the source CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

that one is a photo Antoine took himself, and gave to me for the website I own chronoswatts.com with CC0 license Mathial (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello @Mathial, Thank you for your answer. Would you by chance be able to tranfer the written approval from Antoine to us, please ? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Ludovic Miserole.jpg

Not own work. It is stated (c) Sergio Castor. Uploader has no other contributions. Very unlikely that uploader is the photographer: it lacks proper metadata and is a small size. It can found on the internet on different locations, like https://www.amazon.fr/stores/author/B008F06OA2 Henxter (talk) 12:11, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau.jpg

Dubious own works (low size/quality, no EXIF). Yumeto (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Feldbrahi (talk · contribs)

Claimed to be own work, but metadata indicate different authors, so potentially copyright violations. Would not be surprised if the uploader's other files are also copyright violations.

HyperGaruda (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Rote Kirche in Minsk (52761948336).jpg

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Cherry Blossom April 3 2026.jpg

Because it wasn't taken on April 3, 2026. Giveup57 (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Leila Abouzeid.jpg

Il ne représente pas la personne décrite. Louismuriel11 (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo de l’ORTF Toulouse Pyrénées du 27 juin 1964 au 5 janvier 1975.jpg

Cette image est une reconstitution, donc fausse. Louismuriel11 (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

How do you think this is false? Adtonko (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:FR3 Actualités 1975.webp

Image n'etant pas un travail personnel, je souhaite la faire supprimer. Louismuriel11 (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep COM:TOO Adtonko (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Riff vii cover.jpg

1985 album cover, not in PD in the US. ~2026-36165-09 (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Maria Cecilia Sanchez.jpg

File from blacklisted Flickr account Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:100th Anniversary PNE Parade (4913329591).jpg

The balloon is a temporary display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 17:44, 21 June 2026 (UTC)


Refer to File:CliffordTheBigRedDog1stEdition1963.png, so there may be grounds to review the copyright case in Commons' terms? (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
 Question @ is the copyrightable work of art an illustration of Clifford by Norman Bridwell, or is it a giant balloon representing the dog? Without prior knowledge on this question, I'd lean towards a deletion, but I'm open to different explanations. Webfil (talk) 13:05, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
As the original illustration did not have copyright renewed, the same rationale should apply to reproductions whether of the dog the illustration was of, or a derivative of the illustration. (talk) 13:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
@ Thank you for your answer. Since 1947, several Canadian laws extended copyright protection to citizens or ordinary residents of countries member of the WTO. In Canada, copyrights are valid for the life of the author plus 70 years following the end of the calendar year of death (COM:CANADA), regardless of renewal in other countries. Therefore, I'm one to think the Clifford copyright could still be valid in Canada. Webfil (talk) 22:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
This is true, however the place of publication is the US rather than CAN. As the cartoon character is public domain in the source country, there is no copyright to be claimed elsewhere. There seems no reason to believe that derivatives in balloon form intended to represent the cartoon have some other copyright. (talk) 06:45, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Class 2.png

Likely Flickrwashing, Flickr account only has one other picture. Many copies exist online, and other versions with the same logo and different values can be dated to at least 2020, eg. https://www.reddit.com/r/backrooms/comments/je22tv/level_0/ Belbury (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Letras Malloa.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this and this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-36231-98 (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Letras acceso a Rengo.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this and this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-36231-98 (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Bandera chilena flameando.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this and this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-35958-00 (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Nieve Baños Morales Chile.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this and this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-35958-00 (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Nevazón en Rengo 2017.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-35958-00 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Eclipse solar del 2 de octubre de 2024 desde Rengo, Chile.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this and this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-35958-00 (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Poste indicador localidades comuna de Rengo.jpg

This appears to be an impersonation of original account name. Note the EXIF metadata of this and this file, it matches exactly the same camera model as this nominated file. This strongly indicates that the new account extracted the files from elsewhere rather than being the original photographer, which means the original copyright holder may not have released these files under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. ~2026-36177-99 (talk) 18:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

 Keep This only says someone used a camera of the same model/make. nothing more. Adtonko (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Eivind Engebretsen - Selvportrett (1919).jpg

The artist died in 1960 and according to norwegian "Åndsverkslov" "§ 11.Opphavsrettens vernetid​1 Vernetiden for opphavsrett varer i opphaverens levetid og 70 år etter a. utløpet av opphaverens dødsår for verk med én opphaver" and "§ 67.Alminnelige bestemmelser om overdragelse" (...) "Overdragelse av eksemplar innbefatter ikke overdragelse av opphavsretten eller noen del av denne, selv om det er et originaleksemplar som overdras." - So ownership of a copy does not imply sufficient rights to make copies, or to make copies freely available on Commons. Andrez1 (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Marz71 have uploades several photograps of paintings made by the same painter, dead in 1960. The same argument and process will apply there. Andrez1 (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
this links to the norwegian "Åndsverksloven", the text of the law, the §11 and §67 can be read as is or feed into any automated translator. Andrez1 (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
§ 11 translated via Google translate gives;
§ 11. Term of copyright protection​1
The term of copyright protection lasts for the life of the author and 70 years after
a. the expiry of the year of death of the author for works with a single author
b. the expiry of the year of death of the longest-surviving author for joint works pursuant to § 8
c. the expiry of the year of death of the longest-surviving of the principal director, the author of the film script, the writer of dialogue and the composer of music created for the purpose of the film recording for cinematographic works​2
d. the expiry of the year of death of the longest-surviving of the lyricist and composer for musical works where both lyrics and music have been created for the purpose of the work.​3
1 See EEA Agreement Annex XVII No. 9f (Directive 2006/116/EC (Copyright Term Directive) Art. 1, as amended by Directive 2011/77/EU Art. 1 (1)).
2 See EEA Agreement Annex XVII No 9f (Directive 2006/116/EC (Protection Time Directive) Art. 2 (2)).
3 See EEA Agreement Annex XVII No 9f (Directive 2006/116/EC (Protection Time Directive) Art. 1 (7), amended by Directive 2011/77/EU Art. 1 (1)).
§ 67 translated via Google translate gives;
§ 67. General provisions on transfer
With the limitation that follows from § 5, the author may transfer his right to dispose of the intellectual property in whole or in part.
In the case of transfer of copyright, the author shall not be deemed to have transferred a more extensive right than that clearly expressed in the agreement.
Transfer of a copy does not include transfer of the copyright or any part thereof, even if it is an original copy that is transferred. Transfer of copyright does not include ownership of the manuscript or other copy that is handed over in connection with the transfer. Andrez1 (talk) 12:02, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

-  Wait A ticket has been submitted to VRT from this user for several paintings by Eivind Engebretsen. The ticket lists File:Eivind Engebretsen - Selvportrett (1917).jpg. I believe this file is the file referred to but incorrectly named. I will verify with the user. TommyG (talk) 21:31, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

There was some uploads by the user 19.June 2026 The other files have been deleted. A VRT ticket from the owner of a copy of these images will probably not be enough for the needs of Commons.
The user should try to make an article on the painter on english wikipedia and upload the images there for the article. It will probably there go under fair use. Commons will have to wait in 4 more years until 2030. Andrez1 (talk) 02:53, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
  • VRTS There is an VRTS email received for “File:Eivind Engebretsen - Selvportrett (1919).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2026061910004697. --TommyG (talk) 05:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
  • VRTS I have just accepted permission for “File:Eivind Engebretsen - Selvportrett (1919).jpg” under ticket:2026061910004697. --TommyG (talk) 05:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
    The deletion request will go on. If the uploader does not have sufficient rigts to give avay, the image should not be hosted at Commons under its licenses. Andrez1 (talk) 10:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
    They do have sufficient rights. TommyG (talk) 12:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
    That is not shown from previous information. What is shown is ownership to copies, not ownership to the copyright itself. What is secretly given is maybe not good enough? Andrez1 (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
    If you are confused about the purpose of VRT I suggest you have a look at COM:VRT and any other resources linked from that page. TommyG (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
    The purpose should not to be to overun an open process as an deletion request is. There is a Deletion request for the File:Eivind Engebretsen - Selvportrett (1919).jpg It will end in an Keept or Deleted descision. Andrez1 (talk) 12:46, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

File:Vlcsnap-00039.png

This file likely isn't licensed, confirmation via VRT is required. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

For a screenshot using pre 1940 film? Adtonko (talk) 23:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
pre-1940 film can be under copyright even now. Chance for VRT is really low, however. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 11:01, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
So, my dutch isn't the best, but the screenshot is of a title card in dutch saying "De Jodenverfolging begint" - Start of the Persecution of the Jews. The dutch programme (nl:De bezetting) it aired in is from 1960. approximate timepoint of screenshot
Given the fact that the programme aired 1960, the producer en:Milo Anstadt died in 2011 and COM:Netherlands states: 70 years after his death it will be PD. However nl:Nederlandse Televisie Stichting, the TV station it aired on and who funded the production, was the first state-owned dutch TV station. Therefore Article 15b is applicable. Adtonko (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
That the file should be renamed, if kept, should be obvious. Adtonko (talk) 12:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

File:KarimAhmed.jpg

This is not personal work. It looks like a screenshot. Erlanger16e (talk) 19:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Héctor Obando and Patricia Ayala Ruiz at 2026 Shanghai International Film Festival Closing Ceremony 01 (cropped).jpg

forgot to remove actor's name from crop Runawaymo (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Cav. Attilio De Lisa.jpg

non mi serve in quanto non ha una pagina A. Attilio DE LISA (talk) 20:27, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Schermata 2015-11-04 alle 11.02.25.png

Low resolution, named as "screenshot", so COM:PCP. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 20:27, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Cav N H Attilio De Lisa .jpg

perchè non c'è la pagina A. Attilio DE LISA (talk) 20:29, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Schermata 2019-01-22 alle 06.31.38.png

This photo is screenshot, so likely isn't own work, the scope also is questionable. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 20:31, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:N. H. Cav. Attilio De Lisa .jpg

Already deleted (another user claims copyright too). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


Kept: didn't find any copyright claims. a few picutres were deleted in january because of com:scope, but there are a few newspaper articles about the person in the last month. so I woun't see it out of scope either. --Indeedous (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

File:N. H. Cav. Attilio De Lisa .jpg

perchè non c'è la pagina A. Attilio DE LISA (talk) 20:31, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Cav. dAttilio De Lisa.jpg

perchè non c'è la pagina A. Attilio DE LISA (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:G 75kcoXsAAjb6i.jpg

The file was taken from here, but the uploader listed it as own work, however, you can very clearly the see the speaker symbol in the corner from the sound on the original post. YeetV4 (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:BRASÃO DE ARMAS DE EUCLIDES DA CUNHA.svg

esta com distorção no nome Euclides da Cunha Walisson22 (talk) 22:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:BRASÃO DE ARMAS DE EUCLIDES DA CUNHA.svg

esta com distorção no nome Euclides da Cunha Walisson22 (talk) 22:40, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

File:Salamalzadma.jpg

Copyright مواطن تونسي (talk) 23:51, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Plecionkarstwo - Muzeum SGGW, 2026

No freedom of panorama in Poland for temporary exhibitions.

~Cybularny Speak? 23:54, 21 June 2026 (UTC)