File:Flame towers baku.jpg

No FOP in Azerbaijan. The image depicts a modern architectural work as its primary subject. According to COM:FOP Azerbaijan, such works cannot be hosted on Commons without the architect's EeSmile (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:KingStephenPenny.jpg

The source page says that commercial use is not allowed. Surtsicna (talk) 00:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:AP000001.jpg

No FOP in Azerbaijan. The image depicts a modern architectural work as its primary subject. According to COM:FOP Azerbaijan, such works cannot be hosted on Commons without the architect's EeSmile (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Budda al-ʻĀrif wa-ʻaqīdat al-muḥaqqiq al-Muqarrab al-Kāshif wa-ṭarīq al-sālik almtbtl al-ʻākif.pdf

المخطوط مرفوع في الورشة السابقة : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bddu_al%CA%BB%C4%81rif_wa-%CA%BBaq%C4%ABdat_al-mu%E1%B8%A5aqqiq_al-Muqarrab_al-K%C4%81shif_wa-%E1%B9%ADar%C4%ABq_al-s%C4%81lik_almtbtl_al-%CA%BB%C4%81kif.pdf رِفْد (talk) 01:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Alʻjājh alzrnbyh fī al-sulālah al-Zaynabīyah.pdf

المخطوط مرفوع في الورشة السابقة: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al-%CA%BFAj%C4%81ja_al-zarnabiyya_f%C4%AB_al-sul%C4%81la_al-zaynabiyya.pdf رِفْد (talk) 01:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:San Ricardo Elementary School Talavera

Folk art made by students and school staff/faculty, and images taken in February 2023. In the Philippines these décors are typically seasonal, not year round, and may be tweaked or redesigned in the next season. These are non-permanent folk artworks. Google Street View imageries of the school do not show this folk art. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines for free distributions and publications of images of artworks in public spaces of the Philippines.

• File:Rizal and Talavera Nueva Ecija 30.jpg
• File:Rizal and Talavera Nueva Ecija 32.jpg
• File:Rizal and Talavera Nueva Ecija 33.jpg

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo of GERB-SDS.png

Imagen incorrecta subida UnBGMmás (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Shrine for General An Yong-bok

List of files

• File:Shrine for General An Yong-bok (Busan) - the statue of An Yong-bok (cropped).jpg
• File:Shrine for General An Yong-bok (Busan) - the statue of An Yong-bok.jpg

This seems to be the same monument being referred to by the Korea Times as the statue of Ahn Yong-bok in Suyeong Historical Park. According to w:ko:안용복#사후의 평가, it was installed in 1967. No sculptor or designer has been named, so assume this as an anonymous work. There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in South Korea for anything in public still under their designers' copyrights.

The monument may fall out of copyright in South Korea 70+1 years after 1967 (assuming it remains an anonymous work), considering it was caught by copyright extensions in 1987 and 2013 in accordance with Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Korea#Pre-1963 deaths, organization works. However, being a pre-1978 non-architectural artwork and due to COM:URAA, it will only fall out of copyright in the United States 95+1 years after year of first publication or 120 years after the year of creation, whichever is shorter. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Te Puna Ahurea concept.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Traumnovelle as no permission (No permission since): the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan is licensed as shown. Schwede66 03:12, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

• According to the render is the property of Royal Associate Architects and I doubt a commercial architectural studio would allow their work to be licenced for commercial use. The document is licenced as CC 3.0 attribution but that does not mean everything within that document is licenced that way and the image in the document is credited, although not to the architectural firm oddly enough. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  It’s not uncommon that when you work for a government agency that has implemented NZGOAL that your outputs that they will use will have to be supplied with a free license in order to comply with NZGOAL.

  My company certainly had those conditions in our NZTA contracts for research projects that were to be published with a free license. Schwede66 04:34, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  The building in question was not part of the council's plan but instead was a private venture by Ngai Tahu (hence 'courtesy of Ngai Tahu' on the image caption) Traumnovelle (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  The Christchurch Central Recovery Plan wasn't done by the Christchurch City Council, but by central government. Hence the use of NZGOAL (which hasn't been adopted by CCC). Schwede66 00:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Campaña Wikimedia Argentina 8M 2020.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

The postal is in CC-BY-SA 4.0 by Paula Kindsvater (you can zoom and see it on the postal), is a work done by/with Wikimedia Argentina. I will fix the description. Cheers! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 16:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:인천 차이나타운 공자상.jpg

According to this site, the Confucius statue was "donated by Qingdao, China." One can guess it is less than 70 years old from this clue, and considering the fact that Beijing and Seoul only established formal diplomatic relations in 1988 per w:en:China–South Korea relations, this statue cannot be pre-1988. Since there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in South Korea, Wikimedia Commons cannot host images of contemporary monuments in South Korea that are still under their designers' copyrights, like this one. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:36, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

It was donated in 2002. --Namoroka (talk) 13:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Robert Kennedy assassination - cropped.JPG

Obvious derivative of en:File:Rfk assassination.jpg Based5290 (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Occident coaling Opawa at Wellington.jpg

Artist died in 1948 and thus this work was copyright in NZ in 1996 and had copyright restored by the URAA. Unless evidence of publication before 1931 exists this work is not PD in the US. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

• The National Library interpreted -1-1921 as January 1921. Why wouldn't that be the publication date? Johnragla (talk) 04:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  Date of creation is not the date of publication. There is no suggestion that Haylock had his work published before his death with neither his National Library blurb nor this biography mentioning any display/showing/sale of artwork. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Казань. Скульптура Григория Иванченко в сквере на пересечении улиц Декабристов и Шамиля Усманова (1).jpg

no FOP in Russia Krd 05:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

28 января 2026 года на адрес permissions-ru@wikimedia.org мной был отправлен скан заявления скульптора Г. А. Иванченко - автора данной скульптуры, с разрешением свободно публиковать любые фотографии с изображением его скульптур и прочих работ. На данный момент документы с разрешением находятся на рассмотрении. Поэтому удалять фотографии нельзя, следует дождаться вынесения решения. MarSaf (talk) 15:57, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

On January 28, 2026, I sent a scanned copy of a statement from sculptor G. A. Ivanchenko, the author of this sculpture, to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org, granting permission to freely publish any photographs of his sculptures and other works. The permission documents are currently under review. Therefore, the photographs cannot be deleted; a decision must be made. MarSaf (talk) 13:07, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:El hogar y la moda 2.jpg

Published in 1948. Not old enough to just assume PD-old-70. Missing author information and a valid PD rationale. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Viktor Orbán 2019 (cropped).jpg

This is a derivative, the original image is here: File:Viktor Orbán 2019.jpg The original license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0, the ND attribute does not allow the work to be adapted. Pallerti (talk) 05:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Stathopoulou Eleni 01.jpg

The claimed author seems to actually be the depicted person, so the author is unknown. Published in 1978, not old enough to assume PD-old. Missing author information or permission. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Jerusalem Mufti Al-Husseini Coloured.jpg

Image corruption Fscarmo.wiki (talk) 06:16, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Lencana SK BB 2020 (Tanrsperan).png

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Virginia C. Gildersleeve 1921.png

mauvaise qualité graphique alors qu'il existe une photo de meilleure qualité à peu près contemporaire File:Virginia C. Gildersleeve.jpg Pierrette13 (talk) 07:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep We only delete identical images. "Poor image quality, even though a higher quality photo from approximately the same time exists: File:Virginia C. Gildersleeve.jpg" --RAN (talk) 02:57, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:MIREA coat of arms.png

It's not a state symbol. {{PD-RU-exempt}} is not apllicable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:58, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Образование черной дыры.jpg

Copyvio from . DurbeK82 (talk) 09:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Adrien-rux-musician.jpg

I am the individual depicted in the image. The photo was not taken or published with my consent, and I am requesting its removal on the basis of my right to privacy. The image does not provide significant public interest value and its continued publication causes me personal discomfort. ~2026-69173-0 (talk) 09:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Comment Please see ticket:2017121110000755 and ticket:2026020110003264. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  I would like to clarify the basis of my deletion request beyond personal discomfort.

  Although a VRT ticket from 2017 is referenced, the permission was given without a full understanding that the license granted was irrevocable and allowed unrestricted reuse, including commercial reuse, outside of an encyclopedic context. My intention at the time was limited and did not reflect informed consent as required by Commons licensing standards.

  Additionally, I am not a public figure of enduring notability, and the image does not provide significant current encyclopedic value. Its continued availability primarily facilitates broad reuse unrelated to documentation or education.

  Given the lack of informed consent at the time of submission and the minimal public interest served by continued publication, I respectfully request reconsideration of this file’s retention under Commons privacy and licensing principles. ~2026-74807-7 (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

  Was the permission text missing clause about license irrevokability and/or commercial reuse? Existence of the Spanish Wikipedia article about you makes you notable. Ankry (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Info The image is used and requester did not explain why his permission is required. Also, the photo does not seem to be taken from a hidden camera (per not taken [...] with my consent above) Ankry (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Tuvan ASSR (1971–1978).svg

empty file page. Boston Mayflower (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@Heylenny Please do not create a redirect page after deleting this blank file page. Boston Mayflower (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@Boston Mayflower: Did you not see that this is a redirect? heylenny (^talk/_edits) 00:46, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep redirect. No valid reason to delete it. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 00:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy keep per the COM:FR#Leaving redirects guideline.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

{{SD|G2}} Boston Mayflower (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Delete but ONLY after delinker has done its work, still INUSE.  Strong oppose abusive malformed and multiple deletion requests. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

And that was the problem when Boston Mayflower is nominating for deletion redirects BEFORE delinker fixes everything... heylenny (^talk/_edits) 21:39, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment Can someone explain what happened here? I am very hesitant to delete (rather than either restore a redirect or restore the file previously at this filename) without understanding clearly what is going on. Edit sequence is very strange, including but not limited to this odd edit by Heylenny. - Jmabel ! talk 21:01, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

The "odd edit" done was a file renaming request, but delinker didn't even change the redirect. This user Boston Mayflower is abusing file renaming and requesting deletion of all good redirects. Those are not inappropriate and should be preserved. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 21:36, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, redirects should not be deleted; they are created for a reason. Remember: Filenames are not only intended for Wikimedia projects, but are also used outside of Wikipedia on external sites over which we have no control. Deleting redirects would render the file unusable on an external website. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 00:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

File renamers follow "When in doubt, leave a redirect." per the COM:FR#Leaving redirects guideline. Boston Mayflower should leave well enough alone.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:06, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Azores191 (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Roundel of Egypt (1958–1972).svg

{{SD|G2}}{{duplicate|Roundel of the United Arab Republic (1958–1971), Roundel of Syria (1980–2024).svg}} Boston Mayflower (talk) 10:56, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Oppose I very fervently oppose any further consolidation of the filename spaces of three seperate countries into one file. Fry1989 ^eh? 15:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Embajadores UNICEF.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 but I'm not sure it is a case for F10. DaB. (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Yep. I don't know what I was thinking, or I tagged it by mistake. I withdraw the nomination. Nv8200pa (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Schaftrieb oberes Niedertal 2024b.ogg

video doesn't play – please reupload a working version or delete (same for File:Schaftrieb oberes Niedertal 2024a.ogg); File:Schaftrieb 2024a.webm does play but has no licensing & author info and will be deleted if it's not corrected; maybe these two files are redundant/duplicate to it – just the webm would be best in that case Prototyperspective (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I have uploaded the two files File:Schaftrieb oberes Niedertal 2024b.ogg and File:Schaftrieb oberes Niedertal 2024a.ogg today. With very different results: File:Schaftrieb 2024a.webm (may from a former trial of conversion using which seemed to be not successfull). I do not know what I have done wrong.

I will try do convert the second file, too. Whgler (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

The two files *.webm are working now. Please remove the two failed trials *.ogg. Sorry for confusion.--Whgler (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Dandeson Crowther.png

Implausible "own work" claim from a WikiEd participant. Appears to be a scan of a book or newsletter. Melcous (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep Attribution fixed, you can do the same, rather than nominate for deletion. Also please remember when you take a photo of another photo, you actually are the creator of the copy, even though it does not create a new copyright. --RAN (talk) 17:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Saus panama.jpg

Still from a non-free youtube video. The "permission" that was sent to VRT is unlikely to come from the maker of that video. Mussklprozz (talk) 13:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

It will be listed automatically for deletion per Category:Permission received. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Bocas del toro escudo.png

Not uploader's work. Unlikely to be in the public domain. Mussklprozz (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ильченко Ю.В.jpg

Probable copyright violation, see the source link in summary. Radmir Far (talk) 14:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Metro tivu.jpg

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sin po tv.png

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Hbo signature.jpg

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Louis Balmet

No FOP in France. Balmet died in 1957 so the production of his workshop is not PD until at least 2028, if not later, depending on the date of creation of the stained glass.

• File:Eglise de Saint-Méloir-des-Ondes - Vitrail.jpg
• File:Glénat église vitrail signature.JPG
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 877.jpg
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 878.jpg
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 879.jpg
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 880.jpg
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 881.jpg
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 882.jpg
• File:Marcigny (71) Église Saint-Nicolas Vitrail 883.jpg
• File:Musée et fonderie Paccard 07.jpg
• File:Saint-Marcel - Église Saint-Marcel - 08.jpg
• File:Saint-Marcel - Église Saint-Marcel - 09.jpg

— Racconish ^💬 15:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@Racconish bonjour. File:Glénat église vitrail signature.JPG est juste la photo de la signature du vitrailliste et devrait être conservée comme toutes les signatures sur vitraux. Père Igor (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Glénat église vitrail signature.JPG cropped and kept. — Racconish ^💬 15:15, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@Racconish je trouve fort dommage de tronquer la photo et de ne pas montrer qu'elle est bien celle d'un vitrail car je suppose qu'il ne signait pas sa correspondance de cette manière. Père Igor (talk) 08:50, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Bonsoir @Racconish

Je suis d'accord avec votre proposition de suppression de l'image File:Musée et fonderie Paccard 07.jpg, qui montre une oeuvre de Louis Balmet dont les droits patrimoniaux ne sont pas encore échus. Je suis habituellement attentive à ces questions de droit, mais ça m'a échappé lors du téléversement de la série de photos, désolée.

Pemberlaid (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Landscape carousel xhdpi.webp

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:John Gardner, South Australia, 2018.jpg

Change of mind Rotten john (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. No valid reason for deletion. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Abortion protest.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I've added the template to allow an overwrite to take care of the copyrighted photo (although it is essentially the point of the photograph). Abzeronow (talk) 00:56, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep the image has no copyright The New Foxy (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Alejandra Zaga Mendez.jpg

Small, blurry, not realistically usable. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Delete as nom. We also have File:Alejandra Zaga Mendez.png as a much better photo of the subject. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment @Asclepias: @Andy Dingley: Other picture is a copyvio (screenshot from a Le Devoir video). Webfil (talk) 13:26, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. Only image of subject. Adequate at web resolution. File is now in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep, image is poor quality, but it is COM:INUSE in en-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 18:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment Too blurry IMO. I replaced it on the depicted politician's Wikipedia page, but it is still on en:Wikipedia:Unusual biographical images. There are many examples of bad biographical photos on this page. If you wish to delete it, please also remove it from the gallery on this page. Thanks. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete since it's no longer COM:INUSE. @IronGargoyle and Tvpuppy: Ping. Webfil (talk) 17:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Per Robert Flogaus-Faust above, the image is still COM:INUSE in en-wiki (in en:Wikipedia:Unusual biographical images). Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

File:David de ARAUJO à TF1.jpg

Je suis David de Araujo, la personne représentée sur cette photo. J’avais consenti à son utilisation à l’époque pour un reportage, mais je retire **maintenant** tout consentement à sa diffusion publique ou sous licence libre Ddarj24 (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Board of Peace logo (2).png

It's unclear where this version of the Board of Peace logo originated from. The source image File:Board of Peace logo.png started off as a cropped still from a video (https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2014298110911025251/photo/1) and was later replaced with a low res image of the logo shared to the White House account (https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2014339243221434783/photo/1) when that became available.

On 23 January User:Jasper Chu overwrote the file with a higher resolution version which appears to be AI upscaled (on each side there's a small leaf that became a floating blob, and a twig without a leaf). They didn't give a source for this version, their upload summary was Changed logo to pdf.

User:Coleisforeditor then removed some empty space from Chu's image and cropped it to generate this second file. In uploading it they added the claim that the image was "AI generated; prompted by the Board of Peace", but kept the same x.com source.

(I've since reverted File:Board of Peace logo.png back to the original lower resolution x.com image.)

There was a thread at en:Talk:Board_of_Peace#Wrong_logo about this logo not being the correct one. I pinged Jasper Chu there a few days ago but didn't get a response. If this image is taken from another ("pdf"?) source where the White House created a version of their logo with some errors, we should link to that source. (I can't find any obvious candidate for what that PDF would be.) If the errors are from a Commons user asking an AI to upscale a lower res image, we presumably shouldn't be hosting it at all. Belbury (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: The file should be kept, as it provides encyclopedic value over the version with text for applications such as infoboxes and discussing the image itself (see w:Board of Peace#Symbols). The original appears to be AI generated, see the world map, in which a border appears with Canada but not with Mexico, between Latin American countries, and with Alaska, the Carribean islands appear malformed, the background lines are inconsistently separated and wonky and at points do not appear, etc. This image is cropped to remove the Board of Peace text; the name of this file originally reflected that but was changed amid a disagreement over the terminology used to describe it (seal vs logo) on enwp. I have redone the crop based on the image currently at File:Board of Peace logo.png, which I can assure you has been cropped manually. This probably could've been on the images talk page, given there have been no reasons for deletion raised besides the image being based on an AI upscale, which has already been fixed without deletion. @Jasper Chu: I doubt I will get a response if no one else has got one, but if you could provide a source for the pdf you sourced the image from that would be greatly appreciated. Coleisforeditor (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Official portrait of Lord Randall of Uxbridge.jpg

Need to delete so that "Official portrait of Lord Randall of Uxbridge (main).jpg" can be moved to this name, in harmony with other Parliamentary portraits in the series. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Dapres fernand leger les constructeurs050042).jpg

Painting by French artist Fernand Leger (1881-1955) created in 1950. It is currently in the public domain in France (70 years pma), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following PCP we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Placenta live @ Beach Rock Helenesee Festival 2012.jpg

uploaded by the guy seen on stage (compare german WP profile), so clearly *not* own work ~2025-33812-81 (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:PLACENTA2011.jpg

publicity picture, uploaded by the singer of the band, who clearly is not the photograph ~2025-33812-81 (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I would like to delete my request, the metadata show the correct copyright. I'm sorry for my mistake. ~2025-33812-81 (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:A9gslw55 1pxef80 1bhg.jpg

Not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026, possibly PD-old, but currently undated and unsourced. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I have attempting to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A9v16dw1 1pxef7r 1bhg.jpg

Not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026, possibly PD-old, but currently undated and unsourced.| Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I have am to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A9r7ypcf 1pxef75 1bhg.jpg

Not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026 in GA-USA. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:54, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I have am attempting to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A9b772u5 1pxef83 1bhg.jpg

Not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026 in GA-USA, possibly PD-old, but currently undated and unsourced.| Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:56, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I have am attempting to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A9k3fj4d 1pxef8p 1bhg.jpg

Likely not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026 in GA-USA. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:57, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I have am attempting to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

It is still licensed as "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:"

If, as you now say, the author is "The Church of St. Paul the Apostle", it is not in your gift to do so. We need confirmation of authorship and a licence from them; per COM:THIRD. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

I am representing the Church of St. Paul. How can I license this photo we own? GrafAlpin (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Памятник героям гражданской войны 3.jpg

• also file:Памятник героям гражданской войны 4.jpg

  There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is 1976 statue and protected with copyright in USA until 2072 (95+1 years from death) – in Russia maybe more, depends on when the sculptor died. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  Sculptor: w:ru:Бурганов, Александр Николаевич (born 1935), source: . Nakonana (talk) 15:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:A9rx3r 1pxef72 1bhg.jpg

Likely not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026 in GA-USA. No Exif. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:58, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I have attempting to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Delete the file now has a source, but the source website https://stpaulsavannah.org/ has a very clear "All rights reserved". It is in no way CC0. MKFI (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A910ahfn6 1pxef8g 1bhg.jpg

Likely not own work, clearly not taken on 11 January 2026 in GA-USA. No Exif. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution was due to haste on my part. I am attempting to correct this issue with the proper attribution and sourcing. GrafAlpin (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ticket:2026030110002727 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Усть-Волчиха, памятник ВОВ.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is 1983 memorial and protected with copyright in USA until 2079 (95+1 years from completion) – in Russia maybe more, depends on when the sculptor died. Taivo (talk) 19:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Придуманная причина, здесь нет никаких авторских прав на памятник как и нет никакого скульптора. Всё это вымышленная причина и все обвинения в нарушении чьих то прав недостоверны. Kidus22 (talk) 05:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

The sculptor is unknown per the official government documents regarding this monument. So, 2079 it is, unless the sculptor becomes known in the meantime. Nakonana (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Tmb-official.2e16d0ba.fill-640x800.jpg

This image is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inspector_General_of_the_United_States_Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services_Thomas_March_Bell.jpg 1990'sguy (talk) 20:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I Uploaded It First Why is mine being deleated and not Technetium 99m's? BobPunk1997 (talk) BobPunk1997 (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:View in the Woodrow Wilson Plaza (along the building's 13th Street side) looking to Martin Puryear's "Bearing Witness" sculpture - Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center, HABS DC-860-1.tif

Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Image itself is free, but it contains a copyrighted sculpture by a living artist (Bearing Witness, 1997, Martin Puryear), photographed in the US (no FoP). 19h00s (talk) 20:31, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Isn't the simple shape of this artwork below the ToO? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:57, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

No, imo, it appears to be more than a simple representation of a geometric shape, especially given its material composition (dozens of individual bronze panels combined to form a larger work, not just a large, smooth, bronze shape). Visually, it is two large abstract nonstandard geometric forms: first, a large, bulbous form not unlike a half-shoe facing upwards that has been elongated to monumental height; and a much smaller, curved wedge form that abuts the flat surface of the larger element, visually appearing like a structural support. When combined together, the forms do not appear like a simple representation of a standard geometric shape. As rendered in individual bronze panels and combined together, the forms seem to rise well above the threshold in the U.S.

Martin Puryear has definitely made some works that are probably below the ToO line, but to me, this does not appear to be one of them. 19h00s (talk) 16:25, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Artiste et modèle (Musée national Picasso, Paris).jpg

The works of both Picasso and Giacometti are still copyrighted at least in France, where these artworks were created. For the undeletion date we need the creation date. Günther Frager (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Hazte donante de médula (6558326637).jpg

Currency in Argentina is not in the public domain (these bank notes are from the 1990s) Günther Frager (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:90014 90010 0S50 Coatbridge 22-01-21 (51037295556).jpg

Original photographer unaware it was licensed ~2026-70765-7 (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Gutachten von Magnus Hirschfeld für Gerd Katter, © Archiv der Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft.png

Copyright laut Dateiname mit © Archiv der Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft.png AxelHH (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Simple, formulaic text, below COM:TOO Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 07:51, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep +1; furthermore: author died in 1935, so PD-old-70. The owner of the original document is not the copyright holder. There is no vald reason for deleting. --Jossi (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

The owner of the original document has never given any permission to use this document in the public domain. Thus this case is about theft! Philip Bengler (talk) 06:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Die hat kein Copyright. Einerseits, weil es das im kontinentalen Europa nicht gibt, sondern das Urheberrecht, welches Hirschfeld hatte und das dann auf dessen Erben über gegangen ist. Wenn diese Personen das nicht ausdrücklich dem Archiv der Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft übertragen haben, haben die ohnehin gar keine Rechte daran, als das reine Besitzrecht (und ein museales Reproduktionsrecht).Aber selbst wenn, wären diese Rechte 2006 ausgelaufen. Und auch das nur, wenn man hier überhaupt eine Schöpfungshöhe an diesem Standardtext erkennen möchte. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:04, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep societies can't hold copyright according to German law. Only real persons can be copyright holders. Furthermore, the copyright appears to have expired, and the text is formulaic anyway. Nakonana (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Societies in Germany can hold the exclusive rights of use ("ausschliessliche Nutzungsrechte") if they were transferred to them by the copyright holder which isn't exactly the same as holding the copyright, but amounts to about the same in practice, see de:Nutzungsrecht; so, it's possible that the Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft was the holder of the rights of use of Hirschfeld's works until 2005 (70 years after Hirschfeld's death), but these would have then expired with the expiration of copyright, too. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:36, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Bitte löschen! Die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft in Berlin hat der Verwendung dieses Dokuments in der Public domain nie freigegeben. Das Bild ist nicht das Werk von theirstory historian! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philip Bengler (talk • contribs) 06:16, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Im Übrigen ist die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft nicht nur Eigentümer des Originaldokuments, sondern hat auch die Reproduktion angefertigt, nicht aber zum öffentlichen Gebrauch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philip Bengler (talk • contribs) 06:30, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Das ist doch irrelevant. Hirschfeld starb 1935. Seine Arbeiten sind demnach seit 2006 in der Gemeinfreiheit. Wobei hier sogar hinterfragbar wäre, ob es eine Schöpfungshöhe gibt. Ein Scan kann man schwerlich als schützenswerte Reproduktion betrachten. Auch die Person um die es geht dürfte lange genug verstorben sein, dass es keinen Einfluss mehr auf das Leben nehmen kann. Es gibt gar keinen Ansatz, gar keine Rechtfertigung für eine Löschung. Ich finde den Versuch schon überaus irritierend. Das ist eine Form des Elfenbeinturms, von dem ich dachte, er sei überwunden. Das Archiv der Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft mag das Originaldokument besitzen. Das schließt aber nicht das Eigentum am Inhalt ein. Denn das ist seit 2006 hinfällig. Vielleicht sollten sich die zuständigen Personen auch einmal mit der Rechtslage beschäftigen. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Es ist m.E. möglich, dass die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft Rechte an diesem Gutachten für sich beanspruchen kann, aber nur unter folgenden Umständen: Erstens, der Text ist überhaupt schutzfähig (hat Schöpfungshöhe), was zumindest Rosenzweig hier verneint. Zweitens, das Gutachten wurde nie veröffentlicht, solange es noch urheberrechtlich geschützt war (70 Jahre nach Hirschfelds Tod, also bis und mit 2005). Drittens, die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft hat das gemeinfreie Werk danach veröffentlicht. Dadurch könnte sie dann den Schutz der Editio princeps für sich in Anspruch nehmen, der für 25 Jahre nach der Erstveröffentlichung bei eigentlich gemeinfreien Werken praktisch einem urheberrechtlichen Schutz entspricht. D.h. angenommen, die Gesellschaft hat das Gutachten 2010 veröffentlicht, wäre sie m.E. noch bis 2035 Rechteinhaber. Aber das wäre belegt darzustellen. Unklar ist mir, wie die Lage ist, wenn die Erstveröffentlichung erst hier durch den Upload durch den User "Theirstory historian" erfolgt ist, d.h. wenn dieser User die Datei von der Gesellschaft erhalten hat, aber "nicht zum öffentlichen Gebrauch". Ist dann Theirstory historian durch den Akt der Erstveröffentlichung Inhaber des Rechts der Editio princeps geworden, obwohl dies unautorisiert erfolgte...? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@ Editio princeps

Hirschfeld stellte die Bescheinigung am 23. November 1932 aus, Katter legte sie wahrscheinlich der Polizei vor, damit war die Bescheinigung öffentlich. Sie war wahrscheinlich eine Grundlage für den am 6. Dezember 1932 vom Polizeipräsidenten ausgefertigten polizeilichen Ausweis mit Passfoto und Stempel, der ist per se öffentlich und hat auch keine Schöpfungshöhe, da hier ein behördlicher Standardtext mit Personenangaben vorliegt. Ein Passfoto hingegen ist wiederum so ein urheberrechtlich eigen Ding...

--Goesseln (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Eine Vorlage an die Polizei ist m.E. keine Veröffentlichung. Wenn jedes Werk, das einmal einem begrenzten Personenkreis zugänglich gemacht wurde, veröffentlicht wäre, dann wäre alles veröffentlicht, was nicht gerade von niemandem sonst betrachtet in der Schublade des Autors liegt. Dass eh keine Schöpfungshöhe vorliegt, halte ich aber auch für wahrscheinlich, womit sich die Editio-princeps-Diskussion dann auch erledigt hätte. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:16, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

 Info Bitte diese Diskussion beachten. -- Chaddy (talk) 21:52, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Bitte jetzt dann mal langsam diese LD entscheiden. Dieser Fall ist wirklich sehr einfach zu entscheiden, da die Datei bereits seit 2 Jahrzehnten gemeinfrei ist (falls das überhaupt jemals schutzfähig war). -- Chaddy (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:The rest of the evening was spent with a book - Flickr - Photocapy.jpg

Unused personal picture. Nv8200pa (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. I am normally all for vigorously deleting out-of-scope personal pictures, but I do not think this image should be deleted. It was not uploaded by the Flickr uploader (so there is no promotional intent) and it remains primarily a nice picture of bookshelves. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2026 (UTC)