Commons:Deletion requests/2026/03/24

== March 24 ==

File:Turista en CDMX 01.jpg

If the problem is that it is a derivative work, it was taken in a public space; and given that in Mexico there is Freedom of Panorama, the photograph is appropriate. Luisalvaz (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per nom, the problem is not that the photograph is a derivative work of the sign, the problem is the sign is a derivative work of a copyrighted character (Pikachu). Unless the artist who created the sign got permission from en:The Pokémon Company, then this image have to be deleted since it contains copyvio elements. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
@Tvpuppy: Maybe you are unaware of cases like this: c:File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg. But FOP in Mexico is ok with situation like these. Luisalvaz (talk) 03:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  • If you read the DR discussion for the file you linked, the reason it is kept because it is believed that the Spongebob hot air ballon was authorized by Nickelodeon Brazil (hence permission was given by them).
  • The problem of this nominated image is not about the FOP in Mexico, the problem is the sign itself is infringing the copyright of the Pokemon character, Pikachu.
  • Unless evidence is provided that Pokemon Company had given permission for their copyrighted character to be used in this sign, then this image needs to be deleted.
  • Please see a similar DR discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kuromi.jpg
Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
 Comment, in my opinion, one solution to keep the image is to blur the Pikachu character, then there will be no copyvio elements in the image. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep The image is protected by applicable law because it was taken in a public space. The use of the original image is not restricted, and no authorization from the copyright holder is required. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 04:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Mexico has generally generous FOP of things like artistic signs and murals in public; see {{FoP-Mexico}}. The only question is if the the inclusion of the Pikachu character (from Nintendo Japan) is a violation in itself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
    The possible violation of Nintendo's copyright is an external issue. The photography was created in the context of Wiki Loves Folklore, because the sign painting in street businesses is a local tradition that deserves a proper documentation. Luisalvaz (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete FOP does not nullify the copyright relating to Pikachu. US law is relevant too here, not just Mexican law. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:50, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Kong Sam Ol, 1994.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Forfatter Jorunn Vandvik Johnsen.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by TheWolfPackCrew (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: these images of people were all generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If these images were generated based on freely licensed photographs of notable individuals, please upload the originals.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Nino Zagni Foto Archivio.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Ciao detengo i diritti di immagine di Nino Zagni, per quale motivo è stata eliminata? Maxwikixnin (talk) 08:29, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Wolfram von Soden.jpg

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Omphalographer, thank you for your note. I would like to clarify that this image is not 'AI-generated' in the sense of a fictional creation. It is a restored and colorized version of an authentic historical black-and-white photograph of Wolfram von Soden.
The original image was deteriorated, and I have used technical tools to optimize its clarity and add color to make it more accessible for educational purposes, while strictly respecting the features of the original individual. This is a common practice for historical figures where no color high-quality originals exist.
I am happy to provide the link or the original black-and-white file to prove its authenticity. Could we reconsider the 'Out of scope' tag given its historical and educational value? Cálamo Inquieto (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello Omphalographer, I would like to provide the specific source for the Wolfram von Soden image to clarify its historical nature.
The original photograph dates from 1930 (unknown photographer) and is archived at the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek:
https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/6GBEX3LHRS2BCIZNSIDF64UBPS53UI6B
https://www.bildindex.de/document/obj20550847/fmb24268_07/?part=0  Preceding unsigned comment added by Cálamo Inquieto (talk  contribs) 13:13, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
I am currently preparing a biographical article on Von Soden and needed a high-quality visual representation. Since the 1930 original was significantly deteriorated, I used AI-assisted tools specifically for restoration and colorization purposes (denoising and sharpening). This process was strictly intended to improve the visual quality of an authentic historical document for educational use, maintaining full fidelity to the original features of the person. It is not a synthetically generated person, but a digital restoration of this archival source. Cálamo Inquieto (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for your observation. Upon further cross-referencing of the biographical records and the original source, I have confirmed a case of homonymy with the surname. This image, while a period-accurate restoration, does not correspond to the Assyriologist Wolfram von Soden.
Accuracy is my top priority, so I am voluntarily removing the file from all projects and Wikidata. I appreciate the check, as it ensures the integrity of the encyclopedic content. Cálamo Inquieto (talk) 13:32, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Lisa Lukianoff, Psy.D.jpg

I no longer want my family on this site Lukianoff64 (talk) 04:54, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep A year after the courtesy deletion period is up, license cannot be revoked. --RAN (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete not in use photo of a non-notable person. It may be out of the courtesy deletion period but we should be considerate and kind when dealing with images of living people. I don't see any loss to the project if this image is removed. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  • They are eligible for a Wikidata entry, so this person should have one with this image. It isn't a privacy issue, the person has entries in multiple social media sites. --RAN (talk) 01:59, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
    Anyone is eligible for a Wikidata entry. This is an image that has little (not zero) educational use and the uploader is requesting deletion, given this is a living person we are dealing with we can exercise a bit of discretion and oblige the request for the sake of decency. We want to encourage people to upload to this site and being considerate around these sorts of matters is part of that. Do we seriously care if this image is deleted? Would you have cared if this was just deleted as a copyright violation? Traumnovelle (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Michael Dowling in 2024.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:55, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Why do you believe it is AI? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The image contains C2PA tags which specifically identify it as ChatGPT output. You can view these tags using services like https://c2paviewer.com/. Omphalographer (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gregory Mikhailovich Lukyanov 1848-1919.jpg

I want to remove my family from this website Lukianoff64 (talk) 04:55, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep Uploaded on 15 August 2021. --RAN (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep then you would have been wiser not to upload the photo, but since it is most likely in the public domain (and even if it is not and you hold some rights, you granted an irrevocable license some years ago) it's really not your call. - Jmabel ! talk 23:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
 Comment, I see the latest version of the image has a "magic wand" icon on the bottom left, so perhaps this image version was AI upscaled? Tvpuppy (talk) 01:41, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Good catch. Yes, that is the symbol for MyHeritage and their very primative upscaling that makes the eyes blue as well as upscales. I will see if the original is at one of the other websites. At MyHeritage, you have to pay to see the images. --RAN (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete per COM:SCOPE. Lt Col Lukyanov does not seem to have had a very distinguished career. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 22:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Gregory Fedor Lukianoff.jpg

I want to remove my family from this website Lukianoff64 (talk) 04:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep Uploaded on 15 August 2021 so courtesy delete is too late, the images appear at multiple genealogy websites. The license cannot be revoked. --RAN (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Fedor Lukianoff (Lukyanov family member).jpg

I want to remove my family from this website Lukianoff64 (talk) 04:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep Uploaded on 15 August 2021, to late for courtesy deletion and the image is in the public domain by age. The image is also available at multiple genealogy websites. --RAN (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Manpreet Singh powerlifter.png

Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

this is not an AI image, it's of a real person. the person name is mentioned. ~2026-18276-67 (talk) 11:40, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Kostas Kantzilieris.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Nikolidakis.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Contained - Behind the Scenes - Art Material.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 05:37, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Weak keep look at licensing section of the file SomeFancyUsername (talk) 08:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Active writer's.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Has "Adobe Stock" watermarks across the entire image. Even if the image could be properly licensed, the watermarks make it not useful IMHO. Tymewalk (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

File:ADPC DUAL LOGO Blue.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Aditya Birla Minacs' Facility, Brookefield, Bangalore (2010).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:40, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Adfontis Logo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:40, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep below COM:TOO SomeFancyUsername (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ademi Holding.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:20 RUPEES 2019 2.jpg

It is illegal to publish a original copy of a Indian rupee note. It can be misused in illegal activities. Tempday1ofedit (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:APRP Logo.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Brisbane Transport Logo.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:MinacsOshawa40.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Minacs Toronto.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Minacs Farmington Hills.JPG

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Location us farmington hills michigan.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Location india prestige bangalore.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Schumacherhomes logo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scottish Builidng Society logo 2014.png

Logo likely to be above COM:TOO UK A1Cafel (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 08:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Scottish Builidng Society logo 2014.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Weak keep source of the image can be found using image research, the logo looks to be below COM:TOO UK SomeFancyUsername (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:10 Indian rupee banknotes

Unused, lower quality duplicates of file:India new 10 INR, MG series, 2018, obverse.jpg and File:India new 10 INR, MG series, 2018, reverse.jpg

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:06, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Attributed to Pierre Gobert - Portrait de dame tenant des fleurs.jpg

Request by the own uploader, it's a copy of File:Portrait de dame tenant des fleurs - Attribué à Pierre GOBERT.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 07:25, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Скремета В.О..webp

Promo. Was. Not in use now. Bilderling (talk) 07:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Vue-de-la-residence-principale-depuis-le-lac-bas-2.jpeg

Work of M.A.Velichko (М. А. Величко). He died in 1986. Not {{PD-old-70}} Insider (talk) 08:12, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Это центральное изображение Дачи А.Г. Демидова. Вся статья о Демидовском парке посвещена именно ей. Дачи больше нет, но фография в разных версия распространяется свободно. Сделать другую такую фотографию невозможно. Iaroslav79 (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Подтвердите, пожалуйста, свободную лицензию для этого файла. Авторские права М. А. Величко истекают по ГК РФ в 2057 году. Insider (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Фотография была опубликована в книге анонимно, это видно по снимку. Сменил лицензию на общественное достояние России. Iaroslav79 (talk) 01:56, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Это не видно, и является игрой с правилами. Если есть два варианта, то в проекте для оценки всё равно будут использованы оба. И выбран наибольший срок, минимизирующий риски нарушения авторского права. Для анонимных публикаций, нужно подтверждение анонимности публикации и года обнародования, от него будет исчисляться срок авторского права. Insider (talk) 07:36, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Также не стоит забывать что анонимная публикация отличается от публикации с неизвестным (неуказанным) автором. Если автор неизвестен, если я не ошибаюсь, то это будет где-то 100-120 лет от года первой публикации (на точную смерть автора) + 70 лет по ГК после смерти. То есть даже если найдется публикация 1940 года без явного указания анонимности, то это будет 2100+ год истечения авторского права. Insider (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
На подтверждённой странице Комитета по государственному контролю, использованию и охране памятников истории и культуры — структурного подразделения Правительства Санкт-Петербурга указано: "Главный дом, вид со стороны сада. Фотограф М. А. Величко. 1940 год.". Вернул верное указание авторства. Insider (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Не надо так делать, удаление авторства, которое указано на странице госоргана занимающегося памятниками истории и культуры, и было указано в файле на момент вынесения на обсуждение ни к чему хорошему не приведет. Как я уже указал в описании отмены правки, то что автор фотографии не указан под фотографией в скриншоте ничего не значит, он может быть указан в конце книги в списке авторов фотографий, может быть не определён автором книги, может Вы "улучшили" фото и удалили его перед загрузкой, может удалил его кто-то другой кто разместил фотографию на другом ресурсе и тд и тп. Когда автор установлен удаление его, является нарушением его авторских прав. Insider (talk) 23:20, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

This is scanned page from the 1950 book of N. Belekhov (1904-1956) and A. Petrov (1906-1983). The author is not listed under the photo, so he could be one of the two authors of the book. (But I still think it's M. Velichko (1898-1986), as it's listed here). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vue-de-la-residence-principale-depuis-le-lac-bas-3.jpeg. --Insider (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

As I have told you many times, this photograph has been published repeatedly in Soviet literature without attribution, notably in books by Gorbatenko, Belikhov, and others. Gorbatenko dates the photograph to the 1910s, and Belikhov’s book was published in 1950. Thus, this photograph is in the public domain in Russia under the license PD-Russia, clause 2b, since at least 2021. Iaroslav79 (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
In Soviet literature, this was published once in 1950 (at least, no other versions have been presented yet). In the 2022 edition, Gorbatenko already dates the photo to the first third of the 20th century. I've already written to the Committee for State Control, Use, and Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments, let's see what they say and how they fix the own pages. Insider (talk) 09:09, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Комитет по государственному контролю, использованию и охране памятников истории и культуры подтвердил, что это не Величко и не 1940 год. Верная информация на этой странице (автор не указан и 1930-е). Добавил это в описание файла. По хорошему бы ещё посмотреть книгу Белехова на наличие указания авторства в начале и конце книги. Если и там нет и предполагать, что это не один из авторов книги, то это может быть {{PD-Russia}} пункт 2б, если считать что "не указан = аноним" (см. дискуссии на форуме в РуВики Закон о сиротских произведениях, Сиротские произведения, Карманный атлас СССР, 1940 (11-е изд.)). Если не считать, то, видимо, намного больше. Но настолько в тонкостях авторского права в России я уже не разбираюсь. --Insider (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

File:LagunEin.jpg

Not historical content. Only a personal and imaginary creation. ~2026-18247-87 (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment Agree it is historically dubious personal imaginary artwork, but currently in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Chiesa del Santo Volto (Turin)

No COM:FOP in Italy. Church was constructed from 2004 to 2006 and was designed by en:Mario Botta who is still alive.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Crossed out photos that do not show the church or the campanile, or where COM:De minimis applies. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Files in Category:Chiesa del Santo Volto (Turin)

No COM:FOP in Italy. Church was constructed from 2004 to 2006 and was designed by en:Mario Botta who is still alive.

howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 09:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Author Russell Cahill (45275964921).jpg

Courtesy photo, not a NPS work Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

adding File:Musician Lito Arkangel (34644058806).jpg Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Dome moj Marijan Turkulin Zdenka Vuckovic Zagreb 1965.ogv

Not seeing any reason to believe that this 1970 music track ("Dome Moj" by en:Zdenka Vučković) is {{PD-Croatia}} or otherwise freely licenced. Belbury (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Podul Prieteniei - Satu Mare.jpg

I was looking through my older uploaded iages and noticed this probably shouldn't be up. The bridge is from 2024, and Romania doesn't have FoP. This probably means this may be a Copyvio. DemieK07 (talk) 09:25, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment While the bridge is recent, it looks to me to be of utilitarian design similar to many other bridges for more than a century. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Sg1959 (talk · contribs)

Obtrusive, difficult to remove promotional watermarks that cannot be cropped out or easily edited out. These are in positions where they either cover aircraft features or are over clouds or other subject that cannot be easily cloned/healing-tooled over, and are in positions where they cannot be cropped out. Given the sheer number of aircraft photos on the Commons, of the same types of aircraft and often the exact same aircraft, I would argue these have no reasonably foreseeable educational use. No reasonable editor would use these photos over alternatives that are not watermarked. Also may fail COM:ADVERT.

4300streetcar (talk) 09:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Although we don't like watermarks, we don't delete on that basis. Even when we construct tenuous assumptions about the future on top of that. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
There have been plenty of deletions on the basis of the watermark rendering the image unusable:
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Watermark_Otakarjanujsokol.png
Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Man Playing The Pipes Together With A Family Before A Cottage.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Torre san severino.jpg
Though there's also been cases where images with particularly obtrusive watermarks have been kept:
Commons:Deletion requests/File:1d13c46057b7f527633ff63ac511740038b255da.97.2.9.2.jpg
For the DR - there are other images available of the same aircraft either without a watermark, or with much more easily removed watermarks. 4300streetcar (talk) 04:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Though the uploader did stop watermarking their recent uploads, so perhaps we ask if they could re-upload these without the watermark. 4300streetcar (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian Teflon Advertising.jpg

Was checking my older uploads and noticed this potential copyvio. it was taken in Bulgaria, where there is no FoP, and the sticker is most likely not 70 or more years old. DemieK07 (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian Anti-Euro poster 02.jpg

I was looking through some of my old uploads and noticed this. There is no FoP in Bulgaria, and the design probably passses the threshold of originality enough to be copyrightable. Thus this is probably a copyvio DemieK07 (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Billboards in Oregon

COM:DW: Needs permission from billboard designers. Even though these were photographed in a public place, there is no COM:FOP in the US for 2D works.

howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete all per Howdy.carabao -- Ooligan (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Frame 1321314669 1 x8YOHzo.jpg

Spam. Not in use now. Also - most probaly a fake license because a logo of a financial business can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 10:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Photomontage by ArionStar.jpg

Useless montage. This doesn't meet anything real. Yann (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Why is that a sufficient reason to nominate for deletion? It clearly says it is a photomontage and has been created that way. Would you delete all images that are in the photomontage cateogry because they are not real? E bailey (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
A photomontage can have an educational value. This one doesn't. Yann (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
The photomontage meets the scope called "Category:Photomontages of places". 14:17, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete COM:SPAM: Artwork without obvious educational value, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills. -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep Not promotional, and I don't see an issue with a small number of files of dubious scope by an otherwise constructive uploader. File:Nuvola apps ktip.svg is a horrible vectorization, but should it be deleted?JayCubby (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete Per nomination. A ruin in Saudi Arabia under Greek starry sky? --A.Savin 10:25, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

File:If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?.gif

I uploaded this GIF two years ago, but since I don't really like it and it's not being used anyway, I think it would be better to delete it. Perquirius (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Passage de l’Argue (Lyon, 2025, version 2).jpg

violation de droits d'auteur (coeur à droite) SashiRolls (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Bonjour.
À vrai dire, je ne sais pas si cette installation peut être considérée comme « œuvre d’art », statut auquel s’applique la loi d’interdiction de reproduction de 2001.
En effet, cette mosaïque ne semble être le fruit d’aucune commande, qu’elle soit publique ou privée, car étant un « cadeau » de deux plasticiens fait au passage de l’Argue, comme l’indique l’article du Progrès à son sujet (https://www.leprogres.fr/rhone-69-edition-lyon-metropole/2018/03/12/cette-mosaique-qui-fait-battre-le-coeur-du-passage-de-l-argue). Corentin Eustacchi (talk) 12:07, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Happiness.png

Personal image, out of scope Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:15, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Happiness.png

The sculpture was completed in 2005 by John Seward Johnson II (1930–2020). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2091 A1Cafel (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Great Blue Heron (sculpture)

The sculpture was completed in 2025 by Jeffie Brewer. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the sculptor is required

A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:1900 Storm Memorial (Galveston, Texas)

The memorial was completed in 2000 by David Moore (1921–2001). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2072

A1Cafel (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:點金靈-RSI KD KDJ.png

Copyrighted screenshot in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

那是我的圖,如果能獲得大家引用是好事,沒什麼不可以的!--[[User:twish|<font color="MediumBlue">布學吾樹</font><font color="SeaGreen"></font><font color="BlueViolet"></font>]]([[User_talk:twish|<span style="background:Lemonchiffon ; color:ForestGreen">talk</span>]]) (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Exposição de fotos "Tropeirismo e os Campos Gerais" e Lançamento do Livro "Tropeirismo e Geodiversidade no Paraná" 01.jpg

Violation of Author Rights Sintegrity (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:CURIMBÓ TROPEIRO DE IRACEMA LOGO.png

Violation of Author Rights Sintegrity (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Exposição de fotos "Tropeirismo e os Campos Gerais" e Lançamento do Livro "Tropeirismo e Geodiversidade no Paraná" 03.jpg

Violation of Author Rights Sintegrity (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Exposição de fotos "Tropeirismo e os Campos Gerais" e Lançamento do Livro "Tropeirismo e Geodiversidade no Paraná" 05.jpg

Violation of Author Rights Sintegrity (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Exposição de fotos "Tropeirismo e os Campos Gerais" e Lançamento do Livro "Tropeirismo e Geodiversidade no Paraná" 06.jpg

Violation of Author Rights Sintegrity (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Exposição de fotos "Tropeirismo e os Campos Gerais" e Lançamento do Livro "Tropeirismo e Geodiversidade no Paraná" 02.jpg

Violation of Author Rights Sintegrity (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Yves Klein, Ex Voto per Santa Rita da Cascia (1961).webp

Author died in 1962. Underlying lk (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

I have written to the Yves Klein archive to request permission to post this image to Wikipedia. Beloved female saints (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Dorothée Dujardin, Corporate Secretary of the Yves Klein Archives, has granted her permission for use of this image. Beloved female saints (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pert's Vector Diagram.png

Not needed any more. Saulpert (talk) 23:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (not a recent upload). --Wdwd (talk) 08:52, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Pert's Vector Diagram.png

No record of a dual pert Welp22 (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:My Drivers License 1987-2010 upload by Tripp.jpg

Works of the Illinois government are copyrighted. Therefore, this is a copyright violation, and it needs to be removed immediately. Minermatt122514 (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:New Mexico standard horizontal driver identification card obverse - non-PubL109-13 and with neutral gender designator and number and address redaction.png

The copyright status of works from the New Mexico government is unknown, so this should be removed. Minermatt122514 (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Do you think that the layout is simple enough that an SVG with a placeholder image for the portrait photo and leaving out the microtext art would be below COM:TOO? If so, I can upload a replacement. Arlo James Barnes 18:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Circassian genocide map ua.jpg

a typo + mistranslation. should be незаселено with one н, plus абазини and not абазги. Lyddrie wikiaccount (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Live at CSPAC.jpg

no use without proper description: who is depicted? (nothing of CSPAC = en:Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center is visible) Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Pather Panchali (1955)

There is a an record in the US Copyright Office restoring its US copyright, see https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_6884415.

Günther Frager (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2026 (UTC)


  •  Question: Since the film is indeed in the public domain in India, could this upload of the film be transferred in some way to either the Bengali-language Wikipedia or the local Wikipedia of another Indian language (possibly the Hindi-language Wikipedia)? Given that files in the US public domain are allowed on the English-language Wikipedia even if not in the public domain in their country of origin (1, 2, 3, 4), would this be allowed on those local Wikipedias? — Toast for Teddy (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:CXWL NEXRAD Radar Imagery of the Elie Tornado.png

CXWL was Woodlands, Manitoba, in 2007, part of Canadian weather radar network and cannot be on US NEXRAD display. In any case the source data are not from the uploader and neither the display program. Pierre cb (talk) 17:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Jia shin junior worlds 2025.jpg

Questionable claim of own work; the uploader's similar photo at File:Jia Shin 2025.jpg has the same low resolution and lack of EXIF, and is described as having been taken from Pinterest. Belbury (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:দেবী - বাংলা চলচ্চিত্র (১৯৬০).webm

The US copyright was restored due to URAA, see record in the US Copyright Office. Günther Frager (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Elie Tornado Radar.png

CXWL was Woodlands, Manitoba, in 2007, part of Canadian weather radar network and cannot be on US NEXRAD display. In any case the source data are not from the uploader and neither the display program. Pierre cb (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Elie Tornado NEXRAD scan as it hit the town of Elie.png

CCXWL was Woodlands, Manitoba, in 2007, part of Canadian weather radar network and cannot be on US NEXRAD display. In any case the source data are not from the uploader and neither the display program. Pierre cb (talk) 17:54, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Elie 2007 Tornado Radar CXWL.png

CXWL was Woodlands, Manitoba, in 2007, part of Canadian weather radar network and cannot be on US NEXRAD display. In any case the source data are not from the uploader and neither the display program. Pierre cb (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

I’m sorry for the mistake I made, I am used to referring to radars as NEXRAD, so I may have mislabeled it unintentionally. I want to make it clear that this is my original work, and I personally purchased the radar data for the Elie F5, which I accessed using the weather software GR2Analyst. Del2426 (talk) 02:12, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Aprilia AF1 Sport Pro.jpg

the uploaded image is copyrighted Cagivamito125 (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Template:PD-BlackJack

"Say Hello to Blackjack" was never formally dedicated to the public domain. It is still a copyrighted work; the translated webpage states, "Redistribution is not permitted for copies or data made by the book itself or a third party." This is clearly invoking some limits on its use per copyright. It is more fitting to describe it as copyrighted free use, which is a category in itself. Thus, this category should be deleted. Canned Frootloops (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete I reviewed Sato's Licence Agreement (Link:), Exactly ConcededBear657 (talk) 02:08, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Project Hail Mary Logo.png

Not a {{PD-textlogo}}, includes a background light effect that cannot be considered "simple", therefore it surpasses the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 18:22, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Plan-razvitia-metro-1990-god.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Insider as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © ЛенНИПИгенплана, 1990
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

ЛенНИПИгенплана был ликвидирован в 1994 г. (см. Распоряжение КУГИ Санкт-Петербурга от 26 октября 1994 г. № 859-р.) и копирайт никому не принадлежит. Документ этот распространяется свободно. Я его улучшил и переработал. В такой версии, как я и указывал, он принадлежит только мне. Поэтому я его и загрузил. Просьба оставить документ, на который ссылалось много статей в Википедии.
ЛенНИПИгенплана was dissolved in 1994 (see Order No. 859-r of the Committee for Urban Planning and Architecture of St. Petersburg dated October 26, 1994), and the copyright belongs to no one. This document is freely available. I have improved and revised it. In this version, as I have indicated, it belongs solely to me. That is why I uploaded it. Please leave the document, which has been referenced in many Wikipedia articles.

Iaroslav79 (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The closure of this organization does not entail the removal of copyrights. We need sources for free licensing. Original file at 2011. Are your improvements limited to border cropping? In any case, it will be the derivative work from the copyrighted scheme.  Delete Insider (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
The link to the file dating back to 2011 has nothing to do with the copyright and with the original file. The plan was developed in 1990 by ЛенНИПИгенплана. ЛенНИПИгенплана was a soviet 100% state-owned agency, and it was dissolved in 1994. Accordingly to the Russian laws, this work is not protected by copyright under Article 1259 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, see e.g. this link.  Keep Iaroslav79 (talk) 23:21, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
The link to the 2011 file is provided so that we can compare and understand approximately what work you have done to improve the file. Insider (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
 Delete per Insider. Romano1981 (talk) 05:33, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete ЛенНИПИгенплан was not a state nor local government agency, so the documents it published are not covered by the PD-Ru-Exempt. The plan's primary author appears to be the designer, whose signature appears in the lower left corner of the original (not shown in the fragment uploaded to Wikimedia Commons). The project's chief engineer, the head of the engineering and transport department, and the institute's chief engineer, whose signatures appear in the lower right corner of the original (not shown in the fragment uploaded to Wikimedia Commons), are likely also considered co-authors. Since the plan in question was presumably created in 1990, its authors clearly died no earlier than that date, and may still be alive. Consequently, it will not enter the public domain for a long time.--Yellow Horror (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

File:BND logo gross.png

Duplicate of File:Bnd adler wortbild wiki.svg. PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Thibault Leroy Burki.jpg

This file was initially tagged by DaB. as no permission (No permission since) Ankry (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The free license permission was obviously granted through Flickr and verified. If you disagree, please explain why. Ankry (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
It is clearly not a selfie, so the creator can not be the subject as claimed. So in my eyes the permission (by the real creator) is missing. --DaB. (talk) 21:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
According to the metadata, the author is Oliver Oettli so it is definitely not a selfie. The crucial information may be to verify if the Flickr uploader account publishing the photo belongs to the photographer; unfortunately I am unable to verify that. The author attribution provided in the {{Information}} template is irrelevant for CC0 license and can easily be fixed if needed. Ankry (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
However, the image may be out of COM:SCOPE as the subject seems to be not notable: enwiki article about him has already been deleted. Ankry (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
The image was originally marked as F10, but I did not delete it because he is (or was?) the CEO of an enterprise who is listed by an index in Switzerland (de:BX Swiss). But I know that it is a egde case. --DaB. (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Plaza de la memoria, República Cromañón - Graffiti.JPG

Photograph of copyrighted mural/poster. No FOP for these kinds of works in Argentina, see COM:CRT/Argentina#Freedom of panorama. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:34, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:栃木県芳賀町東高橋1233-1で書かれた絵.jpg

Derivative work (Splatoon) and vandalism. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too different from Splatoon characters to be derivative work imho. --Elly (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

File:栃木県芳賀町東高橋1233-1で書かれた絵.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE Issac I Navarro (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete as a copyvio. This is COM:INUSE and it clearly illustrates both rule 34 and inklings from Splatoon. It has been useful for discussing fan art on commons. However the last two reasons (it’s clearly a drawing of an Inkling and is useful for exemplifying an ambiguous copyright situation) are exactly why it’s problematic. I don’t buy, and have never really bought, User:Ellywa’s closure in 2021; if it’s recognizable and not unambiguously below the relevant TOO COM:PRP applies. Dronebogus (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Could the work qualify as transformative? Because there could be a "new expression, meaning or message" attached to the image, as Splatoon doesn't contain such erotica. Guideline-wise, COM:Transformative works doesn't exist (as of me writing this). Design-wise, the only chart we have is File:Derivative work vs transformative work based on Wikipe-tan.png. I'll wait for more opinions.
Also, @Issac I Navarro, next time you're going to nominate several similar or related files, please follow COM:MDR instead of nominating each file separately. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 07:17, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
You really wanna gamble on that with porn of Nintendo characters? Dronebogus (talk) 07:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Sure, it's not like I'm going to be the first. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 19:09, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
That didn’t go so great back then. I assume the reason we’ve gotten away with hosting this for the better part of a decade is because the internet is now drowning in rule 34 Dronebogus (talk) 05:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete Hariadhi (talk) 08:48, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Please elaborate and explain the reason, W:WP:JV. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 16:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


File:USS Midway Museum 2022 23.jpg

This is a bad quality image that I uploaded Issac I Navarro (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Toronto Subway 2030.png

Obsolete and wrong filetype to overwrite Transportfan70 (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Nollywood Super Star Eucharia Anunobi wearing Ichafu depicting it’s elaborate and Voluminous style.jpg

Not an "ichafu" this is a gele, and the misrepresentation in these images and titles are part of a vandalism sting of AI articles and original research being dealt with on Wikipedia Dolpina (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Components of the Human Genome.jpg

This image has bad quality as jpg. I replaced it in the articles by a better image I created as PNG. So the old one hast become redundant. Sciencia58 (talk) 22:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Baptiste Soulat.jpg

Bonjour,

Cette photo est une photo de moi même publié par un ami il y a maintenant plusieurs années. Il lui est impossible de retrouver le lien d'administrateur. En vous remerciant de la supprimer.

Baptiste Soulat ~2026-18483-27 (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2026 (UTC)