Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking

Shortcuts: COM:DEL/MT • COM:DEL/M


File:Bandeau-kerfourn blason.jpg

Copyvio and no VRT permission TentingZones1 (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:ফরিদপুর পৌরসভা.jpg

COM:FOP Bangladesh ইমন (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

  •  Comment. This building looks quite old. Do you have any evidence that this is still copyrighted? IronGargoyle (talk) 14:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Wait until Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#FoP in Bangladesh is closed Tausheef Hassan Auntu ✉Talk? 20:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sončna ura Lokvica.jpg

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: modern architectural/sculptural work. TadejM (t/p) 21:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. A sundial is a utilitarian object for determining the time of day. There are small sculptural details (i.e., zodiac symbols) but these are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    Weak  Delete. I'll be interested to see what the closing admin thinks, but I'm skeptical that the zodiac symbols are de minimis, and they are not traditional representations in several visible cases but show humor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Marzani Avg.jpg

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: modern sculptural work. TadejM (t/p) 22:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Unsigned memorial stone for WWI era soldier. Certainly more than 70 years after public display of an anonymous work. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    I hope the standard isn't 120 years, rather than 70. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

File:خط الجبهة بين النظام والمعارضة في شمال حماة واللاذقية وغرب حلب في 26 تشرين الثاني نوفمبر 2024.png

هذا الملف قمت بنشر نسخة محسنة بدلا منه محمود سالم شامي (talk) 05:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Link? Abzeronow (talk) 03:24, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
@محمود سالم شامي, could you provide the newly uploaded content's link? Kadı Message 12:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
الخريطة الحديثة موجودة في مقالة هجوم شمال غربي سوريا 2024 محمود سالم شامي (talk) 16:50, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello @Abzeronow: This file should be speedy deleted according the user intenion for his own work; plus to being not used on the other projects; the other map that he mentioned is this one. Best. --SanBonne (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion is not appropriate here as speedy is reserved for open-and-shut cases and this doesn't meet those criteria. The file was more than 7 days old when this request was made, and the two files depict the war on two different dates (Nov. 26, 2024 and Dec. 7, 2024). I could still delete it if it's not educationally useful but since I don't read Arabic, I'm not the best person to make that determination. Abzeronow (talk) 03:22, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Lithuania road sign 540.svg.2015 06 18 17 12 29.0.svg

Appears to have been uploaded mistakenly. It is a modified copy of File:RU road sign 5.28.svg EthanL13[please ping me] 09:45, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Siem Reap-Angkor International Airport

Infringement of building designers' copyright. There is no complete Freedom of Panorama in Cambodia. These images are not eligible for the exception, as these show the architectural art as the "principal/main subject for the subsequent reproduction". Wikimedia Commons only accepts buildings from countries where their copyright laws permit the reproduction of buildings with no restrictions. The airport building in question was completed in 2023.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:42, 14 December 2025 (UTC)


 Comment, I would think that the actual design of the statues in File:Copper Brahma Airport.jpg and File:Siem Reap Airport Sculpture.jpg are not copyrightable due to design alone, it's a very generic 4-faced tower which is found in many places across Cambodia's old Hindu temples; that includes Angkor Wat, what is plausibly the basis for said statue given its location. TansoShoshen (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Opéra Bastille

The blanket statement "because the architect had wished it to be copyleft" is not enough and doesn't comply with COM:L which requires an explicit commercial license from the architect and that such license is specific and irrevocable. If the architect doesn't allow its inclusion in commercial postcards and advertising materials, then this building is still unfree for Commons. There is no acceptable FOP in France, its architect is still living. See an admin's opposing input to my undeletion attempt at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03#File:Opera bastille.JPG. See also , which includes Opéra Bastille as one of the copyright-protected monumental buildings.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Comment If the architect have made a valid statement, that this is copyleft then I think we can keep it. If someone write to us directly via OTRS we should of course try to make them select a specific license etc. But is the statement is not send directly to us I think we should not reject it just because it does not meet our current practice. I bet many old OTRS permissions would not be accepted today for example.
If the architect is alive then pehaps someone that speak French could send a nice mail asking for clarification if needed. --MGA73 (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
    • MGA73 I'm not sure if this will work. Per elcobbola at my failed undeletion attempt, "COM:L requires an explicit license and that such license is specific and irrevocable. Statement that 'the architect had wished it to be copyleft' does not meet these criteria and is entirely inadequate." I realize that it is indeed inadequate because we don't know what type of license does w:Carlos Ott authorize in his blanket statement. CC-BY/CC-BY-SA/PD, or the Commons-unacceptable CC licenses with "NC" (no-commercial) or "ND" (no-derivatives) conditions? A French-speaking (since the architectural artwork is in France) or Spanish-speaking (since the architect hails from a Spanish-speaking country) is encouraged to conduct correspondence to the architect. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
      • JWilz12345 I have not seen the wording of the statement so I can't decide if it is good enough. I just wanted to point out that I do not think we should not be super strict regarding permissions that is not send to us directly. When someone send a permission to OTRS we can be strict because we can easily ask them to clarify and they can easily reply. We can't do that if the statement is not send to us directly. If it is unclear what is meant then I think we should use the least free license instead of just assuming he meant PD. But regarding copyleft then if you read en:Copyleft#Copyleft_principles then it says that it allows derivative works and it is even more clear in the table at en:Copyleft#Types_and_relation_to_other_licenses that "copyleft" does not include NC or ND.
According to Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle we should delete if there is "significant doubt about the freedom". It does not mean we should delete all files where ther is the slightest risk.
So in my opinion we can  Keep if we can prove that he did make a statemt and if he did use the word copyleft. However if it is just the uploader that say "I once met him on the street and he told me that he would like his work to be free" then I would  Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73: the statement is at the category page itself, using an archived source as citation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! The links are broken but on the archieved version on web.archive.org we can see the text. I do not speak French but if the English translation is correct then I think that it is very likely that the architect did in fact whish the opera to be copy left - if SNAPIG (Syndicat national des agences photographiques d'illustration générale) is an organization that can be trusted. --MGA73 (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73: that's one thing I can't answer sadly. I cannot understand French too. Hopefully French Wikipedians will help here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree with MGA73. 73.158.114.70 14:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC).

If it helps any, here is the English translation (from this updated link):

“We can understand the photographer's anger when we know that among recent monuments only the Bastille Opera House can be freely photographed. The architect (an original?) wanted it to be free of rights. Normally, the copyright of architects is required until seventy years after their death. But when a new 'artist' adds his or her contribution to an old building, it's back to the drawing board... This is typically the case with the Eiffel Tower. To reproduce a photo of this national icon at night, you must first pay a fee to the lighting company, the Société nouvelle d'exploitation de la tour Eiffel. The reason? The lighting, let it be said, is a "work of the soul". At least since a ruling by the Créteil High Court in March 1998. In the same way, fireworks and other sounds and lights are also protected... A bit of an exaggeration?”

Furthermore, from the 'What Can you Photograph in Paris?' official Paris City Hall webpage:

"The panorama exception allows copyright to be neutralised for photographs of architectural works and sculptures permanently placed on public thoroughfares (thus ephemeral works are not included) provided that the photograph is not used for commercial purposes."

As for what really is (or isn't) 'copyleft' or not (for any country), 'istockphoto' (getty images) is (also) a good reference: in the link, notice that none of their Eiffel tower images include its lighting, because the SNTE (Société Nouvelle de la Tour Eiffel) does demand authors' rights for images taken of its lighting additions to the tower. And since Getty straight-out sells images, you can be sure that they know that they would be at the top of the target list for any architect seeking royalties/authors' rights. Cheers. THEPROMENADER 08:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

@ThePromenader: I don't think it is sufficient. To quote the opposing input of Elcobbola (one of Commons' veteran admins) over a deleted image of this same building I was trying to restore then: "COM:L requires an explicit license and that such license is specific and irrevocable. Statement that "the architect had wished (or wanted) it to be copyleft" does not meet these criteria and is entirely inadequate." I think the only question us what degree of freeness does the architect wished? Free photography is out of question. Perhaps free, unrestricted commercial exploitations of images of his work is the thing here. Perhaps the true question is: is architect w:Carlos Ott willing to release his architectural work under free license or public domain in the way that everyone can take photos and exploit the resulting images freely even for commercial purposes? And is his desire to release his work under copyleft perpetual/for eternity? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
As for the Eiffel Tower at night, all of the deleted images of it here were recently restored, on the grounds that the current lighting is too ordinary to pass COM:TOO France, and that the court ruling actually refers to a specific lighting during the 90s (if I can recall correctly). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question Does anyone have the actual quote/statement from the architect that they have waived their (copy)rights? -M.nelson (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. There is no Freedom of Panorama in France, per COM:FOP France. We would need a clear statement from the architect. This would be good for the free content lobby. But "copyleft"is too vague to rely on. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Opéra Bastille

No FoP in France, and the building was designed by Carlos Ott who is still alive. France knows a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)  Keep Are you serious ? "The images of the Opera Bastille are free of rights, despite no COM:FOP France. The architect authorized free use of pictures of the Opera. See http://www.snapig.com/fr/Y-a-pas-photo.pdf (archieved version on web.archive.org). Page 23 of this PDF document we can read (in French) : "parmi les monuments récents seul l’Opéra de la Bastille peut être librement photographié. L’architecte [...] l’ayant souhaité libre de droits. (translation : "among recent monuments only the Opéra Bastille can be freely photographed because the architect had wished it to be copyleft"). This document is edited by the SNAPIG (Syndicat national des agences photographiques d'illustration générale), which is quite serious and, according to their website, has been created with the strong wish to respect authors rights.

See also http://www.sne.fr/img/pdf/SNE/Illustration/y-a-pas-photo2.pdf (archieved version on web.archive.org), page 23, or http://www.sne.fr/img/file/pdf/SNE/Commissions/Illustration/espacePublic.pdf (link no longer online), page 10 (document edited by the Syndicat national de l'édition)." --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for that, very interesting. But see above, same argument was made before. If the ones above get undeleted, I withdraw my DR as well. If not, sorry. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs the architect should send an email to the Wikimedia Foundation (see COM:VRTS) if he really desires to allow everyone to exploit his building for commercial purposes. But there is a likelihood that anti-FoP and anti-Wikipedia group ADAGP will restrain him from doing so. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Files in Category:Opéra Bastille

No COM:FOP France, per above we don't have evidence that the architect released it under a Commons-compliant license. Some of these photos could be cropped to remove the opera house, but they wouldn't be very useful, we already have many high quality photos of Category:Colonne de Juillet.

Consigned (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Why is it that no-one has tried to email the architect? A bunch of files have been deleted since 2021, just because a lot of Commoners don't know how to read and write in French and no-one has emailed the architect to get the kinds of clarifications Commons requires. It all seems needless and wasteful. Does anyone have a good idea of how best to try to reach him? My written French is intermediate at best (I speak and read better than I write), but I think in any case that it would be best for a trusted admin to write him. User:Yann, perhaps? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Opéra Bastille

No COM:FOP France. These photos all highlight architectural features, as well as the building plan.

Consigned (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Залізнична рейка «Діошдьєр, Miskolc — OSCYOR 1910 B.A.».jpg

Не тей файл Girnikdima1 (talk) 12:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete on request of uploader shortly after upload (reason given: wrong file).
@Girnikdima1 could you upload a correct file? Если это "не тот файл", могли бы вы загрузить файл который вы считаете правильным? Nakonana (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Бейсембаев Гани Бектаевич.jpg

Unfree image Nurken (talk) 00:01, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

File:12th India-Mongolia Joint Working Group meeting to bolster bilateral defence ties held in Ulaanbaatar 03.jpg

This image is technically Free to use but the Website doesn't say anything about Free to use image KANABAIS (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

could you elaborate? 源義信 (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
https://web.archive.org/web/20241204205144/https://pib.gov.in/web/20241204205144/http://pib.gov.in/content/102_2_Copyright-Policy.aspx?reg=3&lang=1
 Keep. This "copyright policy" page states that these images on the Press Information Bureau (PIB) are free to use with attribution.
The India license on the file appears to be correct. -- Ooligan (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Official logo of Montesquieu Instituut.png

No indication that this user has the copyright over an official logo Dajasj (talk) 07:37, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Andrei Zhdanov (cropped).jpg

See this discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stalin Zdanov.jpg. Event Horizon • Talk 10:29, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Files depicting a logo in Category:Miljöpartiet de Gröna

I'm uncertain if these may be unsuitable based on the country of creation. COM:Sweden seems to show strict rules regarding de minimis, and a low TOO. I am concerned about the palm tree (EDIT: dandelion...) in the logo. It is also in the trademark registry (Svensk Varumärkesdatabas), with the ID 600454, if that matters. In regards to FOP in Sweden, perhaps the permanently attached neon sign might be fine..?

EdoAug (talk) 00:23, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose I have never heard of a case like this in Sweden. The examples on COM:Sweden are quite different. This novel and unbased interpretation would in practice make any photo in a city to falter as there are logos everywhere. Ainali (talk) 07:36, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
"Lots of deletions would be caused by this policy" is not a "keep" reason. But maybe you know something about COM:TOO Sweden that is not currently on that page. In that case, if you can cite an authoritative source, please add it there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
  • EdoAug, where do you get the idea that Sweden has a low TOO? Do you consider File:A6 logo.png really simple? This logo is probably over their TOO, but it's _not_ low. However, Sweden's freedom of panorama seems muddled, so I'll be interested to see how the closing admin rules if we don't just see User:Krd make a deletion without notice to the thread again... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: I think what is "low" is a very subjective opinion. That's the impression I got from the information section. That's why I brought it here, as I found it unclear in our current information page. 🤷‍♂️ I'm not the one concluding this. EdoAug (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Andy Jumardi.jpg

No one is using this file because the article on Indonesian Wikipedia has been deleted by the local administrator 𝄃𝄃𝄂Badak𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃 🕭 Badak Jawa (talk) 09:46, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Canal 6 San Rafael (Logo 1970).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

How have you determined all these files are "irrelevant" in every possible situation? I'd  Keep. Public domain-text logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Canal Seis San Rafael (Logo 2014).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Canal Seis San Rafael (Logo 2015 - 2).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Canal 9 Televida (Logo 2015).webp

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Canal 8 San Juan (Logo 1980).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Canal 8 San Juan (Logo 1990).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:58, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Canal Ocho San Juan (Logo 2015).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 17:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete Not likely to be "irrelevant", but this logo likely surpassed COM:TOO Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Canal Siete Mendoza (Logo 2000).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Presumably PD-textlogo, even in Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Cocos (Keeling) Island.png

Might be copyrighted in Australia. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

 Weak keep. It consists of simple geometry, and is therefore in the public domain. Any child can draw that. OMGShay 92 (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)


Kept: per comment. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Cocos (Keeling) Island.png

This file was initially tagged by ~2025-36400-89 as Fair use (non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo Yann (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No new argument since last DR. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Cocos (Keeling) Island.png

All other versions of the flag have been deleted. Same image, same rules. See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2025/12#Cocos_Islands_flag_status Ponor (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Below COM:TOO. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 19:42, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
    Then why were the other two copies of the same flag deleted? Several people argued in the discussions linked in my Village pump post that Australian TOO is very low. So we either undelete the deleted files, or delete this one as well. The file needs proper license tags, the previous ones were invalid. Ponor (talk) 01:06, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep, en:WP:TROUT nominator, and restore SVG versions. Trying to have an entire country's flag scrubbed from the record over copyright paranoia, counts as wikilawyering at best, and vandalism at worst. Kinopiko (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    foundation:UCoC is a good read on how to address other users, @Kinopiko. DO NOT ASSUME BAD FAITH. This is a legitimate concern: we cannot have three deletion discussions about the same flag with opposing deletion results. I have a wiki category with a number of "missing image" articles, and I need to know what to do with it. Ponor (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    Australian COM:TOO is very restrictive, but I don't understand why we've had 3 deletion requests of the same file in less than 4 months. The argument has been the same all 3 times, so I think it's kind of ridiculous and should be given up. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
    Undelete the other two deleted images of the same flag, add proper license tags, and we're good. Because I don't see how anything ad hominem helps us in this case. As I've said, same image, same rules. As you've said, and as people here have said, Australian COM:TOO is very restrictive, no wishful thinking can change that. Ponor (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
    My remark was not ad hominem. Why do you think it was? I'm saying it's ridiculous to have 3 deletion threads for the same file for the same reason in less than 4 months. That's a comment about procedure and has nothing to do with who is responsible for those threads in this case, as it is in no way unique for there to be numerous deletion threads about the same file for the same reason. I totally get that you'd like for there to be consistency between different admins, though, and it annoys me, too, when there isn't, because then it's unclear where the line is really drawn on this site. But if this deletion request ends in a keep, will you give up on it being deleted then? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek I'm not pushing for a delete. We need to know whether any of the three flag images are allowed on Commons, or whether we should move them to individual projects for fair usage (like they did on the English Wikipedia). I can't claim fair usage if there are "free" versions available on Commons. This is all legal stuff, and if nothing says these images are free, we need to assume they're not. People getting annoyed by several "discussions" (hardly any arguments) in 4 months is a weak legal argument, especially when we have two other images already deleted. Ponor (talk) 14:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)


@SpinnerLaserzthe2nd's suggestion is to use a modified version of the flag, with the original palm tree replaced with a generic version: File:Flag of the Cocos (Keeling) Island.svg. I see nothing wrong with that. Individual projects can still upload their own copy and claim Fair Use, I believe. Ponor (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

I see something very wrong with misrepresenting what their flag actually looks like. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
But it is misrepresenting with a good reason. If we were upload the actual design of the tree, that would violate copyright. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 01:40, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
I don't consider that a good reason. Either we can host the flag or we can't, but hosting a falsified flag is misleading and therefore bad. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Canal 7 San Salvador de Jujuy (Logo 2007).png

Irrelevant CooperBox (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep all current or former logos of television stations in Argentina that are determined to be below COM:TOO Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Wapens van families Spierings.jpg

Probably no own work. The coats of arms seem to be old, but the collection on a paper for some purpose is younger. GerritR (talk) 20:00, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Police officers inside Robb Elementary School.png

This file was initially tagged by HouseBlaster as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence the CCTV footage was released under a free license|source=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3poHE3nOb8&t=5s%7Chelp=off
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether it might be ok per PD-CCTV, as File:Uvalde school shooting.png. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh I didn't know about {{PD-CCTV}}; I certainly think it applies here.  Keep and relicense as such. Apologies for the hassle. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
 Delete, this has been discussed before regarding this specific camera. It very clearly moves in videos shown, meaning it is human-operated. EF5 ._. (talk - contribs) 14:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
 Keep, do you know where the previous discussion is at? From the video, it doesn’t look like the CCTV was human-operated, it looked like it was a 360° CCTV footage that was edited for it to “spin” from one angle to another (you can see the original frame of the CCTV footage “spinning” in the video). Tvpuppy (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
I believe it was in January this year, although I'm not sure of the file name. As for the 360 part, I'm still hesitant to keep per COM:PCP, as it could technically be either and PD-automated is a stringent PD tag. EF5 ._. (talk - contribs) 22:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep This is just a screenshot from the video, where the camera moves just once, over an hour before the screenshot was taken. In the hour between, there doesn't appear to be any movement from the camera, and likely no human-operation. A similar situation over at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Air India 171 runway CCTV.webm, where there was some human input on a CCTV video, resulted in a keep. Falls under PD-CCTV imo. ARandomName123 (talk) 01:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Police officers inside Robb Elementary School.png

A copyright violation. Uploaded from a YouTube with the watermarks of a news station. Dosman1123 (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uvalde school shooting.png (same school and same case, deleted against discussion) Commons:Deletion requests/File:Air India 171 runway CCTV.webm (other case, kept). No opinion in the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:59, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Cupboard work for home.jpg

The image is of low technical quality and lacks any educational or encyclopedic value. It depicts an unfinished, generic TV unit under construction in a private residence, which does not contribute to the mission of Wikimedia Commons. It is clearly out of project scope (COM:SCOPE). Sezenkerem 00:56, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. I think this is probably usable to illustrate something about home improvement. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
    Yeah, seems potentially usable but needs categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Nathan Bowen

Derivative work of non-free content. There is no freedom of panorama for murals in the UK (COM:FOP UK). Graffiti does not enjoy special protection even if placed illegally (COM:GRAFFITI).

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2025 (UTC)


File:Lambretta motorren modelo gama.jpg

1987 poster. Cjp24 (talk) 12:27, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Jarman family crest.jpg

This file is a low-quality screenshot of a coat of arms from an external website/application, as evidenced by the large transparent logo in the center and the Google Translate icon in the corner. There is no evidence that the uploader holds the copyright to this artwork or that it is available under a free license. This appears to be a clear copyright violation (COM:COPY). Sezenkerem 14:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Google One logo.jpg

This is the official logo of Google One, a proprietary service owned by Google LLC. The uploader does not hold the copyright to this corporate trademark. As it exceeds the threshold of originality and is a non-free logo, it cannot be hosted on Wikimedia Commons under a free license. Clear copyright violation (COM:COPY). Sezenkerem 14:35, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Comment. This is very likely below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
    •  Keep Yeah, pretty obviously so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:GODFATHER.jpg

This is a personal photograph of two unidentified individuals in a residential street. It lacks any significant educational, informational, or encyclopedic value that would justify its inclusion in a media library. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal file storage or social media platform. The file is considered out of project scope (COM:SCOPE). Sezenkerem 14:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Comment In use in pnb Wikipedia. (I am illiterate in that language, but usage suggests it is in scope.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
    In fact, that article is about a movie called "Godfather" (see IMDB info). And the two persons (Doyal acharjee and SivaDebraj) depicted in the photo have nothing to do with that film; they are neither the director nor the cast. I suspect an ignorant Wikipedian simply used the wrong image. 0x0a (talk) 09:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
    I'd  Keep this as simply a pretty good portrait photo in a somewhat interesting urban setting, but I suspect the photo will be deleted as "personal" or whatever. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Wana sabo mashene roba roba da mutane.jpg

The image is a low-quality, poorly lit photograph of a common motorcycle. It lacks any significant educational or encyclopedic value and does not illustrate a specific subject in a way that contributes to the project's mission. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal file hosting service. Out of project scope (COM:SCOPE). Sezenkerem 14:46, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Dunno, it's kind of peculiar-looking. It might be miscategorized, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Wana wakena da a kecisa.jpg

The image is a low-quality, out-of-focus photograph of a pile of white beans. It lacks any significant educational or scientific value as a botanical or agricultural reference. Due to its poor technical quality and redundancy (better versions already exist on Commons), it is considered out of project scope (COM:SCOPE). Sezenkerem 14:47, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Usable but miscategorized. Does User:Yahaya alhaji umar always miscategorize? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
As far as I can see, yes. They consistently use only the 'Wiki for Minorities' category for their uploads, regardless of the actual content of the image. Sezenkerem (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Wana alalene da a keci.jpg

The image is a very low-quality, out-of-focus, and pixelated photograph of a food dish (Alale). It does not meet the technical standards of Wikimedia Commons for educational media. Due to its poor quality and lack of informational value compared to existing high-quality food photography on the platform, it is considered out of project scope (COM:SCOPE). Sezenkerem 14:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

How many other photos of this dish do we have? I'd keep it except that this is another small, miscategorized photo and I suspect @Yahaya alhaji umar of downloading photos from websites. Are you doing that, Yahaya? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Wana dila gojone.jpg

The image is a very low-quality, out-of-focus, and pixelated photograph of what appears to be textile or waste bales. It provides no significant educational or informational value and does not meet the technical standards required for hosting on Wikimedia Commons. Due to its poor quality and lack of encyclopedic context, it is considered out of project scope (COM:SCOPE). Sezenkerem 14:52, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Yes, kind of unusable, or virtually so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Wanna nukileyane.jpg

Low-quality mobile screenshot of a missile launch. Redundant and lacks encyclopedic value. (COM:SCOPE) Sezenkerem 14:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete And seems to be a screenshot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (most left) and Tun Dr Siti Hasmah (far right) sitting around the table with their classmates at King Edward VII College of Medicine, Singapore.jpg

This photograph depicts Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and Siti Hasmah Mohamad Ali during their student years at King Edward VII College of Medicine in Singapore. The file is currently claimed to be public domain under Singapore Copyright Act section 96 (published editions). However, section 96 applies only to the typographical arrangement of a published edition (such as an entire newspaper or periodical page), and does not apply to individual photographs reproduced or later extracted from such publications. This image is an independent photographic work taken by an unknown photographer and should therefore be treated as an artistic work / photograph. Under Singapore copyright law, photographs are protected for 70 years after the death of the author, and there is no evidence that this term has expired. Furthermore, at the time of United States copyright restoration under the URAA (1996 / 11 June 2004), the photograph was still under copyright in Singapore. As a result, copyright was restored in the United States. Since Wikimedia Commons requires works to be in the public domain both in the source country and in the United States, this file does not meet Commons licensing requirements. ~2025-43032-57 (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

File:علم اقليم ذي قار او اقليم الناصرية.jpg

I would like you to delete this article, which I created myself. Best regards. Wuxiiz (talk) 08:32, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Patrulleros del SVA, HJ I y Águila III en Barcelona.jpg

Salen caras de personas. Yurakuyuraku (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2025 (UTC)


File:Patrulleros del SVA, HJ I y Águila III en Barcelona.jpg

Imagen subida por error Yurakuyuraku (talk) 17:12, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandra Becker 01 (talk · contribs)

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC) well, these are all my own works, and I put them under a public license to share them. I am an artist with a large community interest, that is why. And yes, sure modern art - that is what I do. best, --Sandra Becker 01 (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

If you need further information on the solo exhibition you can find it in portugues and in English.[1][2][3][4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandra Becker 01 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

 Keep permissions for the illustrated works given by the copyright holder in ticket:2017092010028742 --DCB (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Kept: per DCB. Ruthven (msg) 11:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Sandra Becker 01 (talk · contribs)

copyvio, no permission fot the text, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 01:52, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Ryan Harrison cricket.jpg

Unfortunately, this is not cricketer Ryan Harrison. It is Bevon Jacobs. Please delete as this is incorrect. JaumeBG (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

@JaumeBG why not just {{Rename}}? Nakonana (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. I ended up uploading File:Bevon Jacobs.jpg. So this one needs to be deleted. Cheers. JaumeBG (talk) 04:44, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:DotBT domain logo (custom).svg

fictional and hoax logo, out of scope BurundiNdayishimiye (talk) 12:38, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. In use across multiple projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

File:DotJM domain logo (custom).svg

Hoax logo, out of scope BurundiNdayishimiye (talk) 12:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Condessa Jessica Piazzi di Savoia.png

Unauthorized photo used; the author is demanding justice, please delete Claudiaprados (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 11:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Unauthorized photo used. Claudiaprados (talk) 18:49, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Count Tunin, photo was taken in London in January 2011.png

Unauthorized photo used; the author is demanding justice, please delete. Claudiaprados (talk) 00:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

 Info: ticket:2014021010009166 --Achim55 (talk) 06:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)


Unauthorized photo used; the author is demanding justice, please delete. Claudiaprados (talk) 11:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Guangzhou (82559).jpg

Error, bad upload, wrong image. Rc1959 (talk) 08:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Proxima Flute (By C34).png

Random image uploaded when author was younger. Proximaprotogen (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  • Random as in you didn't create it, or random as in you don't think it's useful? I found some similar postings from Reddit by this user https://www.reddit.com/user/Finn-The-Wizard/ who goes by C34. So probably not own work. Looks like uploader nominated it for deletion in response to a talk page enquiry at Wikipedia. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Robot from the cartoon Nehochukha Unwantie 2025.jpg

Character from 1986 cartoon. It hasn't entered the public domain. DurbeK82 (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Map of Illyria under Bardylis.png

It is not accurate. Please delete. I’m the creator Albanian Studies (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete Request of the uploader after 1+1/2 years. m:CentralAuth/Albanian_Studies Superseded by File:Illyrian Empire under Bardylis.png. @User:Albanian Studies: always link to the good file when claiming a file would be bad. The good file has sources, the underlying map comes from free in a special not necessarily CC-compliant manner. The underlying map on the bad file most probably is NOT own work either. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:51, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I made it on ibis paint. Just delete it Albanian Studies (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Памятник на Ваганьковском.jpg

No FoP in Russia BurundiNdayishimiye (talk) 06:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Per file description the sculptor is Category:Lev Matyushin who died in 2023. Undelete in 2094. Nakonana (talk) 21:07, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Times Square 2026 Numerals (amber lightbulbs).png

Useless file NAVYCJ12894 (talk) 07:32, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Times Square 2026 Numerals (flash of orange lightbulbs).png

Useless file NAVYCJ12894 (talk) 07:46, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Maharaja Virendra Vasudev Mohan Dar of House of Dar.jpg

This is the incorrect image I had uploaded TrikityTikki (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

INCORRECT-image TheYellowNeegayi (talk) 07:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Energizer Bunny commercial (1988).webm

File:Energizer Bunny appearance 1988.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Probably still copyrighted, for more information ask User:ZigZagTheTigerSkunk SomeFancyUsername (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Uploader says this wasn't registered properly, how do you prove a negative? -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 16:46, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
From ZZTTS's last summary:
We don't know if energrizer is PD becuase of the february 1981 code of federatins that plagues Doug and Noid's status, so i removed im for now SomeFancyUsername (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I mean, we don't need to delete it right now.. But looking back at the doug situation: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:(appsgolem.com)(360p)(00-06-07)(00-06-37)_WHO-TV_NBC_commercials_Septem.webm. ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - according to all available evidence, this was published without a copyright notice and without subsequent registration. SnowyCinema (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Look it says it here https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-37/chapter-II/subchapter-A/part-202/section-202.2#p-202.2(c)(8)(ii) In the case of an untitled motion picture or other audiovisual work whose duration is sixty seconds or less, in addition to any of the locations listed in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section, a notice that is embodied in the copies by a photomechanical or electronic process, in such a position that it ordinarily would appear to the projectionist or broadcaster when preparing the work for performance, is acceptable if it is located on the leader of the film or tape immediately preceding the beginning of the work.  REAL 💬 ⬆   19:25, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
So I'm assuming that means that there's a chance that post-1929 television commercials could fail simply because of how short they are, and because of the possibility that the master tape could include a notice in this manner (which would be nearly impossible for a layperson to prove or disprove). Shouldn't we include a notice about that in our {{PD-US-no-notice}} and {{PD-US-no-notice-post-1977}} templates? SnowyCinema (talk) 21:36, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
It is after November 1981 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-37/chapter-II/subchapter-A/part-202/section-202.2#p-202.2(c)(1)(ii) "The provisions of this paragraph are applicable to copies publicly distributed on or after December 1, 1981"  REAL 💬 ⬆   22:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Hmm.. idk, I kinda agree with SnowyCinema a bit.
Also the problem is, are they "untitled"?
This only applies to post-1981 works 60 seconds or lower, not undoubetly public domain works over that such as the Arnold claymation short or works before that such as Fred the Baker.
But do we even need to find the mastertapes to prove if Energizer, Doug or Noid are copyrighted? Besides, many 1980s "public domain" commercials even after November 1981 are still on Wikimedia and possibly sold on DVD too.
So... Keep? ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
It is untitled or 60 seconds it doesnt have to be both also they put that in the law especially for commercials because companies kept forgetting to put a notice on them so you can't assume there was no notice  REAL 💬 ⬆   23:29, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Ik ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 00:36, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delete Eveready Battery Co. v. Adolph Coors Co. ruled that this commercial is not public domain. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
@Nard the Bard: If so then this vote needs to set a precedent, and the license templates need to be updated with this information so that people don't add commercials like this in the future. SnowyCinema (talk) 23:40, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Actually about that, no the lawsuit didn't really rule the commercial was "not public domain">
Despite the court stating federal registration there is no registration for any "Energizer" commercial before 1989: https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/search?page_number=1&query=%22eveready%20battery%22&field_type=%22keyword%22&records_per_page=10&sort_field=%22copyright_number_for_display%22&sort_order=%22asc%22&model=%22%22
Also despite that "ruling" it was more of a trademark issue and the parodier ended up winning due to fair use. There is indeed no notice on the work, but it may be under copyright due to December 1981 law for 60 seconds and under works. ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 00:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
"In addition to its unchallenged (and therefore presumptively valid) statutory copyright registrations for two of its commercials, Eveready also has ownership rights under the Copyright Act in its unregistered commercials. See 17 U.S.C. § 302(a) ("Copyright in a work created on or after January 1, 1978, subsists from its creation ..."); see also Hays v. Sony Corp. of Am., 847 F.2d 412, 415 (7th Cir.1988) (Copyright Act of 1976 "made federal copyright attach at the moment of creation ..." It doesn't matter if you believe the ruling is incorrect. The ruling is the law. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 02:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Well, do court decisions even change how copyright works despite research saying otherwise? If true, it only means for this commercial though and seems like a Twin Books case at best,
Besides most if not all TV Commercials made before November 1981 and all non-60 second visual media are still public domain in the US due to no notice or registration.
Also notices were still required until February 28th 1989, i don't know how a unregistered no-notice commercial is still under copyright before that unless it aired in 1989 and not 1988 but i'm not a lawyer so... ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 06:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Can you found some lawyer and ask him about this situation? SomeFancyUsername (talk) 13:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Not all lawyers know copyright law, and i can't afford one either.
So should we just keep it or delete it? ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
@Clindberg: Do you have an opinion to share about this situation? SnowyCinema (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Hm. The main thing to me is whether it was distributed without a copyright notice. I can accept that they did not register this commercial with the Copyright Office, but that in and of itself does not mean that copyright was lost. Between 1978 and 1989, it does mean that if they failed to put a copyright notice on the work on distributed copies, that they could not recover the copyright, so it may be meaningful. The Eveready Battery Co. v. Adolph Coors Co court case mentioned did not specifically rule on this commercial; they noted that Eveready had obtained registration on a couple of other commercials and a trademark registration by then (1991), and in general ruled that Eveready did own copyrights on those and undoubtedly related items (obviously anything that came after March 1, 1989 was automatically still under copyright). The ruling was against Eveready on fair use grounds -- and it was rejecting a preliminary injunction, meaning it was not a final ruling, but only that Eveready was not likely to succeed in its copyright and trademark infringement arguments. The reasoning being primarily fair use, as it was a parody, recognizing the Eveready did own some copyrights at issue (the parody did not copy this commercial, but general elements from many commercials). The moment of publication is when physical copies of the commercial were sent to distributors, not the actual broadcast itself. If there was no copyright notice present on those copies, copyright was lost. A registration within five years was one required step towards clawing back the copyright, so at the time of the court case (1991) it couldn't have been definitively public domain, but the court did not look into the notice issue at all (there were clearly many other commercials which were protected).
Losing copyright for lack of notice requires that actual copies are distributed without a notice on them, not straight publication -- offering for sale is publication, but unless copies are actually distributed without notice, copyright is not lost (sort of a subtle additional requirement in the law clause which gives the conditions under which copyright is lost). Broadcast is not even publication, and is definitely not distributing copies, so you could not lose copyright through broadcast alone. (The Oscar statuette was deemed unpublished in a court case despite being broadcast for many years.) For motion pictures, the copyright notice did need to be visible on the title screen or a few other places. However, as quoted above: In the case of an untitled motion picture or other audiovisual work whose duration is sixty seconds or less, in addition to any of the locations listed in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section, a notice that is embodied in the copies by a photomechanical or electronic process, in such a position that it ordinarily would appear to the projectionist or broadcaster when preparing the work for performance, is acceptable if it is located on the leader of the film or tape immediately preceding the beginning of the work. That means for commercials like this, the copyright notice only had to be visible on the physical copy used by the broadcaster, i.e. the physical copy actually distributed, and did not need to be visually present in the broadcast. Someone recording the commercial off of a broadcast would have no idea on that, either way. So what evidence do we have for lack of notice in the first place, given that possibility? Without knowing that, not sure how we can keep this. The PD tag given is more for print advertisements -- I think it would mean that a copyright notice on the surrounding TV program would not cover this, but given the explicit federal regulations from 1981, it means that we have to know if there was a notice visible to the broadcaster on the physical copy, not whether there is a visible one in the broadcast version. So for me  Delete on that score. That law likely makes it extremely difficult for us to presume that commercials like between 1981 and 1989 became PD, as that is near impossible to verify unfortunately. But, it is the law. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
To be honest and in my opinion, TV Commercials before 1978 and 1981 are considered "Published" because they are techinally advertisements and have been sold on DVD for decades. They are pre-recorded and were fixed in a tangiable form.
For me, i would delete this because of the 1981 code of federations. All TV Commercials that were published without a notice before December 1981 are undoubetly in the public domain, if there's a notice it is copyrighted, but if before 1964 and not renewewd it's public domain.. Before 1976 is also undoubetly for commercials to be public domain.ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
The moment of publication for motion pictures became rather well defined through court cases -- see here and here. It was when copies left the original producers and were sent to the distributors. Actually showing a movie in a theater, or broadcasting one, were not "publication" by the definition in copyright law (either the statutory one from 1978 or the definitions the courts used prior to that). Thus, a broadcast from a single station, or a test showing or premiere of a movie where the actual reels were still under the producer's control, had not yet been published. But once copies of reels were sent to distributors, they were published right then, usually before broadcast or showings. So it was at that point that those copies needed to have copyright notices. For motion pictures, the placement of the notice was prescribed -- either the title sequence, or credits, or a couple of other places. So, you could judge based on what was shown or broadcast. For commercials though, which were very short and did not have the traditional title screen or credits sequence, and every second cost money, that was eventually deemed too onerous, and from 1981 notices on the physical copies were allowed to be enough even if not in the broadcast. So yes, virtually all such commercials were sent to distributors so they were all published. But to show "published without notice" is extremely difficult given that federal regulation. That is the critical part here, to me. They were undoubtedly published, and I'm satisfied that a registration was never filed, but unless we can identify actual physical copies without a notice, copyright may not have been lost and would be valid until 2084. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:31, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Yeah.
Again, the fedeartion notice on master tape is only for commercials made after 1981. So we still have loads of public domain ads.
But a court decision would have to affix the late 1981 for energizer.
So should we delete the commercial or..? I do research on TV Commercials copyright more often. So yeah. ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 02:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Agreed for TV commercials before November 1981. We may need to tread a little carefully in that the pre-1981 situation was generally considered unfair and a judge may stretch to find a reason that copyright was not lost, but really the motion picture requirements were rather specific and you can't ignore those. There was a reason the regulation was enacted. And yes, pre-1964 commercials still needed a renewal. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
@Clindberg
That is why i and 999real uploaded the first Wilkins and Wontkins commercial, since it was not renewed and it's from 1957.
Judges can be kinda confusing, but the lawsuit never told us. But it must be about the 1981 regulations. but we have many undisputed public domain 1950s commercials on Wikimedia preserved.
All i can say, we tread carefully and make sure to stay closer to pre-1981 uploads. A friend on discord told me Commercials are disposible and companies wouldn't care even if there was a vaild copyright on them. But it's safe to say pre-1976 commercials with no renewal and/or notice are 100% likely to be public domain and post 1976 and pre-1981 too if no notice or registration was found.
Also nice to meet you? Sorry i mostly research comic strips and not really commercials, but Wilkins and Wontkins' public domain status was the biggest discovery from last year and i wouldn't have done it without @999real to be exact. He's my best buddy. ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
The judge in this court case was not even considering lack of notice arguments -- it was not a point of contention in that case so really was not ruled upon. It's technically possible that it was published without notice but evidence will be near impossible to come by, and I doubt the parties in that case cared. They would have needed to make that argument, along with whatever evidence, for the judge to actually rule on that aspect. In any event they did not copy from this specific commercial but aspects from many other commercials, most of which were 100% still copyrighted as being after March 1989. So really, that ruling has no bearing here, other than we know a couple of other commercials were registered, and a trademark did get registered. The copyright notice rules still applied to them; a judge would actually have to examine that aspect to make a binding ruling. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:12, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Changing my vote to  Delete given the 1981 ruling (even though the court case involving Eveready seemed to be irrelevant to this matter), but with the caveat that I really hope that the information in the 1981 ruling is included in the {{PD-US-no-notice-post-1977}} template going forward. And we may want to consider a number of other commercials we host for deletion on these grounds, including a handful of other ones I myself uploaded believing them to be in the public domain due to the lack of nuance in the template and other copyright documentation we have at Commons. I will be making sure to follow up on this matter if it's not done after this discussion. SnowyCinema (talk) 06:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Fred the Baker can stay because his commercials do predate the December 1981 federation. ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
I'm stating to question this federation thing a bit.
I'm changing my vote to "Possibly Keep?" Because the law states "untitled Motion pictures" but this is not untitled. I could be wrong though ZigZagTheTigerSkunk (talk) 12:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Bengali graffiti in the July Revolution

No freedom of panorama in Bangladesh since 2023.

Syrus257 (talk) 13:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Several of these, such as File:A homeless man in Dhaka University area sleeps on the street.jpg are below TOO. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:42, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

File:French Embassy 4 (3620424687).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:DERIV of a modern 2D work with no context about the creator. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 22:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Depending on which artist created this it might be PD. See -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 22:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC)


  •  Comment: According to this French wikipedia article the artist (Jean Lurcat) died in 1966. Does this make it PD? I doubt it but invite other replies. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
    no but I didn't know which artist it was -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 22:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Comment: I don't know sadly. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Lily Agnew with Robbie and James Carmichael.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Guliolopez as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader claimed "own work" and "self/cc-by-sa-4.0" while stating that this image was captured in 2018. The uploader also stated that the image dates to the 1940s - when it was was (presumably) taken by someone other than the uploader (who was seemingly born 30 years after this image was taken). Both things can't be true at the same time. Uploader has since, effectively, acknowledged their mistake: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.J._Magee&diff=next&oldid=1138099399 -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 22:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Ireland switched from 50 year copyright to 70 year copyright in 1995, which means this "early 1940's" image was PD on the URAA date. Note that Ireland did not require "publication" under the former Act, merely that the photograph existed. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 22:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
    It's okay to delete the image. I couldn't figure out how to or I would have done so myself. Several of these photographs are in my possession and I thought they were longer subject to copyright, but it's probably best to delete them in line with your rules. I'll definitely need to get a better understanding of what to select when adding photographs in the future. With thanks and best wishes M.J. Magee (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Aeroexpress logo.svg

There are no simple geometric figures on this logo. For more information please consult this message on Russian Wikipedia. Event Horizon • Talk 19:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't care, I don't need it any more. Back than I uploaded it after @Putnik, as an expert I trust, decided that it fits the license. IKhitron (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep This is a very simple, geometric graphic of an airplane that has been rotated 72 degrees five times. I know it seems complex at first glance, but it's actually based on basic geometric principles. Therefore, I believe the license is appropriate. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2026 (UTC)


File:काभ्रेपलाञ्चोक जिल्लाका गाविसहरू.png

Boundaries inside of this map or old vdc map is not correct. thats why as a publisher i nominate this map for deletion. पर्वत सुवेदी (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep discuss/raise this on the Wikipedia. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:26, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gameboy advance sp cartridge.jpg

derivative work of copyrighted labels. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

vk most are pd-text-logo and we even have freely licensed representations of Spongebob. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 18:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello, im sorry for being uploaded that image with the cover arts, in its moment i didn´t know i couldn´t upload that, anyways i uploaded an edited version in case that could avoid the elimination of the file. My best regards! __JWolfie98__ (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

File:New Market in Szczecin, 2025 (20951).jpg

Duplicate uploaded due to technical issue in app Szczecinolog (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

File:New Market in Szczecin, 2025 (14317).jpg

Duplicate uploaded due to technical issue in app Szczecinolog (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Sienna Street in Szczecin, 2025 (18615).jpg

Duplicate uploaded due to technical issue in app Szczecinolog (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

It seems that the files has already ben merged/handled per e.g. {{Dupe}}. Or do you still wish that this is deleted? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Amanat YAB Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad Sempena Sambutan Hari Malaysia 2018.webm

This file should be deleted due to a clear copyright violation. The video shows a live broadcast of a public speech by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad during Hari Malaysia 2018, with a visible TV3 (Media Prima) broadcast watermark. TV3 is a commercial television network, not a Malaysian government agency. The YouTube uploader (“Hidup Selalu Ceria”) is not the copyright holder of the original TV3 broadcast and therefore has no legal authority to release this material under a Creative Commons license. A CC license applied by a third-party re-uploader is invalid. Public appearance or speech by the Malaysian Prime Minister does not place the broadcast recording into the public domain. No evidence of permission from TV3 / Media Prima or a valid VRT (OTRS) authorization has been provided. As the original source is a copyrighted television broadcast and the licensing is false, the file is ineligible for Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. ~2026-43964 (talk) 18:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Sky Cinema Drama HD - Logo 2021.svg

No image Papertop (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Unclear reason for deletion. File seems fine. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    And PD-textlogo.  Keep if notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Scenic landscapes of Jawadhu Hills, Tamil Nadu,Amirdhi Zoo, featuring forests, waterfalls, and Kavalur Observatory..jpg

Collage with no source for component images. Unless you can verify that all 15 images are created by the user, this is likely copyvio. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Wittes (Pas-de-Calais, Fr) ancien prieuré St.Jean-Baptiste.JPG

C'est une photo de mon domicile. Comme il est visible sur Commons j'ai régulièrement des gens qui le trouvent facilement et entrent dans la propriété. Merci d'avance pour votre compréhension ! Heddryin [🔊] 16:36, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

For me, the photographer, deletion is no problem.--Havang(nl) (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)


  • Sympathy to the deletion requester but  Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. Living in a historic location comes with strings attached. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

User talk:Fabe56

لا استخدم Madiksh (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2026 (UTC)


  •  Speedy keep Nonsense request. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Mapa carteles mexico 2026.png

Inaccurate information BarbacoaLosDomingos (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Granted, the file is unsourced, meaning there is no way to know how the uploader has meant the map.
On the other hand, the nominator has not provided information on why the map is supposedly inaccurate, either. An unproven claim of factual inaccuracy (as long as the reason is not entirely obvious) is not really a deletion reason here, this should have been started with "disputed map", giving the uploader time to correct or provide sources.
The nature of the map makes me tend to go for a weak delete, now: the uploader was a first-timer who has not been online since, and has not challenged the DR or tried to set things right. --Enyavar (talk) 21:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Redmi Logo.png

Duplicate Мункач Варош (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Redmi Logo.png

The uploader Say is CC-BY BUT is not CC-BY istrademarkJamesLatts (talk) 13:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

and I wanna say The creator is wrong about CC-BY is trademark JamesLatts (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Trademark protection ≠ copyright protection. Wiki Commons is only concerned about copyright. The logo consists entirely of text, so it might even fall under {{PD-textlogo}}. Nakonana (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Dante Boninfante (6448275917).jpg

Wrong player photo. This is Luigi Mastrangelo Wozimba (talk) 14:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

{{Rename}}. Nakonana (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)


keep it. A wrong name is not a reason to delete a file. I changed the name. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 17:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag map of the Republic of Molossia.png

Accidentally uploaded this file first, now there is 2 flag maps of molossia Rayqal86 (talk) 15:19, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

File:An Inuit group in Inuit and European clothes. RMG G04268 (retouched background).tiff

this was a failed attempt to upload a new retouched jpeg version of this image in a way that will display it as a derivative of the original (it failed because apparently there's no way to upload a "new version" using a different format) Joalbertine (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Ob Hill and McMurdo Station 1.jpg

Duplicate of File:Ob Hill and McMurdo Station.jpg Artem.G (talk) 13:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Živan Haravan (2016).jpg

no rights, not in use Aharonh (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Archil of Imereti, Koningh van Iberia en Melita.jpg

I make an mistake by uploading this image instead to upload a new version in: File:Artschillus Bagarationus. Koningh van Iberia en Melita.jpg, I should have done like: File:Nicolaes Davidszoon. Georgiaens Koningh.jpg, I would upload a new version in the former image. Gergos10 (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

You already uploaded a new version of this image. What is preventing you from doing so again without any deletions? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Calligraphy of Imam Abu al Qasim Rafi.png

i have already created this ShafiNotes (talk) 11:36, 13 January 2026 (UTC)


File:Calligraphy of Imam Abu al Qasim Rafi.png

This illustration of Abu al Qasim al Rafi'i have some flaws ShafiNotes (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Карта Казахского ханства.png

Низкое качество карты Sazhik99 (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Map of the Kazakh Khanate in its heyday.png

Низкое качество карты Sazhik99 (talk) 20:02, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kazakh Khanate map.png

Я был молод и глуп Sazhik99 (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kazakh Khanate (Urusov Yurt) map2.png

Я был молод и глуп Sazhik99 (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kazakh Horde under Tauekel Khan 1598.png

Я был молод и глуп Sazhik99 (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kazakh Horde under Hack-Nazar Khan.png

Я был молод и глуп Sazhik99 (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kazakh zhuzes under Abylai Khan.png

Я был молод и глуп Sazhik99 (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Khanate of Kasym (Kazakh) in the period of power.png

Я был молод и глуп Sazhik99 (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:A thing before I sleep.png

Thing I made a while ago no reason to exist Editor account 2222 (talk) 02:35, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy delete author request Dronebogus (talk) 20:33, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

File:В.И. Ленин. Три источника и три составных части марксизма 1954 г.jpg

Don’t usr Shamilio 1986 (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Why not? This seems like the cover of a historically important book, and it's below COM:TOO and therefore in the public domain. I would  Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Nomination by uploader one month after upload, but I also don't see why it should be deleted.  Keep Nakonana (talk) 21:40, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ә.Мұқтар.jpg

Looks like a photograph from a governmental website of some kind, quite probable not an own work. Event Horizon • Talk 10:04, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Я и есть автор этого фото. Снимок сделан мной лично и не был взят с какого-либо сайта. Фото было сделано специально для загрузки на Commons, и я опубликовала его под свободной лицензией. AnainaLee (talk) 11:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
The depicted guy appears to rather be an academic (historian) than a politician though. Nakonana (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:2026-01-15-17-14-12-741477-a67bda7aede3f3240cc4fc57561d16679650fee39cff788b69f63575d0bc1ef8.svg

Missed version of file, intending to replace it with properly named version Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Gao Qiu.webp

Works of Dai Dunbang (1938-) are not free. SKBNK (talk) 17:36, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

File:MW Teuerung in der Schweiz zZ 1. Weltkrieg.jpg

Duplicate of File:MW Teuerung ber.jpg (in incorrect orientation). Nakonana (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Dadashsymbolflag.jpg

The flag was created with a wrong design and has been renewed. Alpp.1.34 (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

True Version
File:Dadaş Sembolik Bayrağı.png Alpp.1.34 (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Merlin Sandmeyer at Southside Festival 2025 (57303).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete this + other photos nominated by user, legitimate uploader's request, photos not in use ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:01, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
    •  Keep all per IronGargoyle, others. We don't owe a courtesy deletion for noteworthy photos uploaded last year. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)

File:Merlin Sandmeyer at Southside Festival 2025.jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025 (72921).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025 (62476).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025 (99183).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025 (71156).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025.jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:57, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025 (80397).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:57, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jan Böhmermann at Southside Festival 2025 (58396).jpg

I took this photo. I want to delete all concert photos that show people. Thank you! KatastrophenKommando (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Within scope image of notable individual. Not recently uploaded. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Chahamanas before 1192.jpg

This map is very wrongz the ranthambore is located in rajasthan not madhya pradesh Chandel itihasam zy (talk) 03:18, 20 January 2026 (UTC)


Files in Category:Allow Me (Portland, Oregon)

The statue was completed in 1983 by John Seward Johnson II (1930–2020). There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2091

A1Cafel (talk) 09:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)


Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Allow Me in December 2013.jpg and File talk:Allow Me, Pioneer Courthouse Square.jpg. -Another Believer (talk) 13:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep per Commons:Hirtle chart#Architectural works SomeFancyUsername (talk) 14:51, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep per SomeFancyUsername. - Jmabel ! talk 18:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
If these images are kept again, can we put a template on Category:Allow Me (Portland, Oregon) to prevent future nominations? -Another Believer (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag Map of British Raj (Azad Hind) (1942).png

nominate for deletion, we already have one of these files Idk373738367 (talk) 21:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Sanae Takaichi signature.svg

The file has insufficient attribution as a signature and is also a duplicate of an existing file. Since I was unable to edit or replace it properly, I am requesting deletion in order to upload a corrected version. Samon rice (talk) 07:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Battle of Mamma.png

The image is misleading: Caecilius died in battle, he was not executed. This image is widely circulated and used for nationalist purposes. Mostasem gridi (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment Tineye claims to have found image on a page it indexed first time in 2017, but that just mean the page was indexed then, not that the image was present at that time (can have been added later). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:36, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Памятник участникам похода Таманской Красной Армии. Акт экспертизы.pdf

Зачем нужен этот документ уберите документ и замените что Красный Квадрат (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Зачем нужен этот документ? Уберите документ и замените его на Красный Квадрат (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep appears to be an official document regarding a cultural heritage monument. DR was filed by now blocked vandalism-only account. Nakonana (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag-map of the world (1789).png

This picture contains disinformation with numerious mistakes. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

 Support Ths map erroneously displays the flag of United Kingdom instead of the flag of Kingdom of Great Britain. Some flags and heraldic symbols are used without credit to copyright owners and proper license information, eg. File:Coat of arms of Spain (1785-1873 and 1875-1931).svg. Thuresson (talk) 20:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of the world (1789).png

Perhaps the most innacurate map on Wikimedia Commons, this page: https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/dhwln5/flag_map_of_the_world_in_1789/ shows every reason why. TheDestroyr (talk) 06:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

File:National Front Party Egypt.png

ملف غير حر Aelrhman2007 (talk) 11:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete for the file really isn't free but more importantly, it's on Wikipedia being used in a way that does qualify as w:WP:F. It should be deleted here because the statement that it doesn't meet the COM:TOO is probably false. Lekritz (talk) 11:46, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag Map of British Cameroons.png

new version Idk373738367 (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Please merge both versions: with the name of the above but content of File:Flag Map of British Cameroons (final version).png (not that I was able to discern significant differences). --Enyavar (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:BSicon BHFq-exl.svg

Duplicate of File:BSicon KBHFxaq.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 14:07, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

File:BSicon BHFqer.svg

Duplicate of File:BSicon KBHFxeq.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

File:RAZZBERRIES (1931).webm

Copyright renewed in 1959. Will be public domain next year in 2027 Accidentallyhonest (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Please link to the renewal record. I just searched the 1959 entries and did not see it. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 23:54, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
As stated by U.S Copyright Law, film copyrights last for 95 years. And, Doing The Math, 1931 + 95 =2026. So, this cartoon went into the public domain on January 1, 2026. WikiUploader9000 (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Seal of Municipal of Mandaluyong (1975 - 1986).png

Because it is mistake RosellConrad418 (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

File:São Gonçalo do Rio Abaixo (1).png

Gostaria de apagar ele pois pode ter direitos autorais Kairos Rabelo (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:SGRA Brasão.png

Gostaria de apagar ele pois pode ter direitos autorais Kairos Rabelo (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

  • Translation: "I would like to delete it because it might be copyrighted." -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 02:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
    Check Brazilian law first. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Joint Regional Transport Officer Rank Insignia (Kerala).png

Better version uploaded Asifalinair (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Elevado de Los Alcarrizos y el Metro de Los Alcarrizos desde un dron.jpg

This photo does not have the correct license. Markocortesa2 (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you correct the license, or is that beside the point? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teoria origen Sauceda.jpg

Podría contener material protegido por los derechos de autor. Manolo (desfógate) 00:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Se trata de la portada de un libro que publiqué, diseñada por mí y que incluye foto de mi autoría. Pepe59 (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

User:YessMy67

Sock puppet of Esok OkMy134 (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Jay Jo mullet.png

It’s a picture of myself, I uploaded a new one. Liege (talk) 07:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep and recommend putting the old one back in articles. The new one has harsh lighting that makes the mullet harder to see. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:52, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag Map of Nazi Occupied Belgium.png

I made a different version Idk373738367 (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Ouafa Oualhadj.png

Challenged speedy deletion. Original reason was copyright violation, while I believe it should be allowed under the license used to upload to YouTube. Tristan Surtel (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete - I don't see a CC license at the video description. The 'CC' in the square on top means "Closed Captions". Jcb (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
I believe it is published under the YouTube CC license, as the video shows up in searches when filtering on the license: search. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
@Jcb: Let me know if this is sufficient proof of the compatible license. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Revoking of a DR by nominator is a courtesy that is unlikely to happen with comments like you can read below. In case of such unfriendly behaviour, nominators will tend to leave it to closing admin. Jcb (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep no reason REAL 💬 ⬆ 02:49, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
@999real It would have been great if you would have noted that you changed the source between my nomination and your comment from a nonfree to a free one. Now you make it look like I did a wrong nomination, which I did not. Jcb (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Yes, you did. It is the same source just on regular video view instead of Youtube shorts which doesnt show the license (Replace 'shorts/' with 'watch?v=' in the url) REAL 💬 ⬆ 16:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
It's up to the uploader to refer to the correct place to show evidence of a compatible license. Jcb (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
And it is up to the person who made the deletion request to undo it if it turns out that the image does have a compatible licence. - DonCalo (talk) 02:59, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
I can confirm that the timestamp added by 999real is indeed the correct one. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Clearly uploaded with a Youtube-Creative Commons license.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

File:صورة شخصية نجلاء صوان.jpg

ملفي خاص اتراجع عن نشره نجلاء صوان (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Morce domaci.jpeg

Blurry image, many superior images of guinea pigs exist Dronebogus (talk) 20:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

File:THE TEMPERMENTAL LION (1940).webm

Not public domain until 2036 Accidentallyhonest (talk) 14:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

@Accidentallyhonest: Do you have proof of copyright renewal?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:54, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
All Terrytoons but Wolf Wolf and The Talking Magpies had their copyrights renewed. Accidentallyhonest (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Renewed per R431401 in 1968. Delete per nomination. Bacromisee (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Clima do município Santa Rosa de Lima-SE.jpg

Já upei outro com uma qualidade melhor. CarlaVieiraBio (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Localização das coleções de fósseis e gêneros encontrados em Santa Rosa de Lima-SE.jpg

Contém erros. Já upei outra versão sem erros. CarlaVieiraBio (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Liancourt panorama.jpg

I want my image to be deleted from Wikipedia. Korziox (talk) 03:42, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Why? Uploaded more than a month ago, and currently in use in multiple projects, seems a useful in-scope image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
 Keep, uploader’s request but uploaded a month ago, image is good quality and COM:INUSE in multiple wikis. The deletion reason is not sufficient enough for a courtesy deletion. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

I want my image to be permanently deleted for privacy reasons and permanently delete the metadata in the process, this is my right, delete everything. Korziox (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. The file was uploaded here in July 2025, long before the usual "grace period" of one week for courtesy deletions. --Rosenzweig τ 17:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Liancourt panorama.jpg

(The image and all data should be gone forever, impossible to undelete). I am the author, this image contains homes and I believe it violates privacy rights, I really want you to delete this permanently, for it to be gone forever, metadata, all of that, this is important. ⚠️ Do not make it restorable, it should be permanently deleted, impossible to restore, gone forever. ⚠️ Korziox (talk) 20:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep In use, and I fail to see how this violates privacy rights. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
    User:Korziox, if there's a genuine privacy issue, explain it to the COM:VRT. Otherwise,  Speedy keep per COM:INUSE, and in my opinion, you should be blocked if you request deletion again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
    There is a VRT ticket now at ticket:2025121110062423, but IMHO no comprehensible reason for deletion.  Keep Krd 13:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment I have removed the geocoordinates from the file and oversighted the relevant revisions. Hope that helps a bit. Raymond (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Why did you remove the geocoordinates? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2025 (UTC)


Kept: per discussion, the geocoordinates have been rightfully oversighted and there isn't a valid reason to salt the photograph itself. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Liancourt panorama.jpg

I am the original uploader of this image and would like to request courtesy deletion. I understand that the license granted at upload is irrevocable and that the file is currently in use, but I am experiencing significant personal distress related to this image and would appreciate consideration if possible. Korziox (talk) 13:04, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

 Speedy keep. Per Commons:License revocation and your previous two attempts to delete (1, 2), you are prohibited from attempting to delete this image. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (Wikipedia talk · Global contributions · he/him) 14:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Distress? What distress? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (Wikipedia talk · Global contributions · he/him) 02:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

 Schnell behalten, Wird in mehreren Projekten eingesetzt. TentingZones1 (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)


Kept: repeated strange request without sensible explation; per previous, no new reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Liancourt panorama.jpg

I’m the author, I made this image with AI, basically what I did is I first generated the image, then printed it, then took a picture of it, I really want this image to be completely removed as it’s just an hallucination, misinformation and not a real representation of the city, please delete my image, it would be really appreciated. Korziox (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Do you not understand that you are now allowed to to nominate this article for deletion?...
In your previous requests, you claimed a variety of different things, and the AI excuse doesn't sound realistic either. Aesurias (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
There was a mistake uploading this, I am mentally exhausted, and deleting my image will fix the mistake, please, I am the author, I apologize that I want to delete my own image, but that’s just this, I won’t bother anyone after this is deleted. Korziox (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of Niue.svg

Flag is missing TheDestroyr (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand this nomination. Who cares if the flag is missing? This image is being used, even without it. Just upload a second file with the flag visible if it bothers you, no need to get rid of this. MediaKyle (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep - I understand, but we can fix it just by uploading a new fixed version. ErrrrrWhat (talk) 02:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:M365 Copilot.png

The Copilot logo is copyrighted per https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_37345689, registered under VA0002412662. SGHFan (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File:M365 Copilot.png

Copyrighted. Uploaded to Commons instead of English Wikipedia. GoddisonRae (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Street art in Whitstable

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the UK. Notice that them being graffiti is not a valid reason to keep them, see COM:GRAFFITI.

Günther Frager (talk) 22:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep this would be fine if there was consistency, but Blek le Rat, banksy and other artists of this type (and with a geographic connection) haven't been targeted Back ache (talk) 09:48, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
@Back ache: that is not a valid reason to keep the images. This is s not a DR about scope so keeping or deleting these images is based on legal basis. Btw, have you take the time checking how many DRs were open in the last quarter about graffiti in the UK or even about Banksy before making such claim? My intuition tells me you didn't. Günther Frager (talk) 14:24, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
The last one may fall under the "de minimis" exception, but needs a better title. The artwork is half overgrown and so small that I had to look thrice - at first and second glance I thought the yellow smear and the scratch in the plaster were considered the artwork ;-) --Schlosser67 (talk) 05:33, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Budda al-ʻĀrif wa-ʻaqīdat al-muḥaqqiq al-Muqarrab al-Kāshif wa-ṭarīq al-sālik almtbtl al-ʻākif.pdf

المخطوط مرفوع في الورشة السابقة : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bddu_al%CA%BB%C4%81rif_wa-%CA%BBaq%C4%ABdat_al-mu%E1%B8%A5aqqiq_al-Muqarrab_al-K%C4%81shif_wa-%E1%B9%ADar%C4%ABq_al-s%C4%81lik_almtbtl_al-%CA%BB%C4%81kif.pdf رِفْد (talk) 01:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Alʻjājh alzrnbyh fī al-sulālah al-Zaynabīyah.pdf

المخطوط مرفوع في الورشة السابقة: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al-%CA%BFAj%C4%81ja_al-zarnabiyya_f%C4%AB_al-sul%C4%81la_al-zaynabiyya.pdf رِفْد (talk) 01:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Metro tivu.jpg

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sin po tv.png

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Hbo signature.jpg

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I am the original uploader and I request this file to be deleted because it is no longer needed. Rahmadzetlovers (talk) 15:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:John Gardner, South Australia, 2018.jpg

Change of mind Rotten john (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. No valid reason for deletion. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ماهان زارعی.jpg

عکس بدون رضایت شخص قرار داده شده است Mahanzareii (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Kettlebell sportlerin.png

AI generated image which is not tagged? Not too familiar with wiki's rules on gen AI though Vyasama (talk) 09:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, image is currently COM:INUSE in de-wiki. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Usage of AI-generated images is against dewiki policy though: w:de:Wikipedia:Künstliche Intelligenz. Nakonana (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Aaryan Nitin Shukla.jpg

This is very old image Kss007in (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Adassa 8.jpg

Missing VRT to confirm it belongs to the user Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Brasão de Viana.png

Baixa qualidade Erichssen123 (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Spirale aperta Arnaldo Pomodoro.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1998 by Arnaldo Pomodoro (1926–2025). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2096 A1Cafel (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment The Foundation Arnaldo Pomodoro, owner of the copyright of the artist, in 2018 has authorized the publication on Wikimedia Commons with license CC-BY-SA 4.0 of the images of all the works by the artist on public display in Italy. Unfortunately this photo was uploaded in 2016, and from the authorization's wording it's unclear wether it's valid also retroactively. --Friniate (talk) 12:52, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
    Dimenticavo, @Manuelarosi se vuoi puoi scaricare la foto ora sul tuo PC e ricaricarla a settembre durante la prossima edizione di Wiki Loves Monuments. In questo modo non avresti alcun problema di copyright, la foto ricadrebbe senza ambiguità nell'autorizzazione. Ricordati quando e se la vorrai ricaricare di aggiungere nelle licenze Template:Monumento italiano e Template:CC-BY-4.0 con attribuzione alla Fondazione Arnaldo Pomodoro. Friniate (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
    Grazie, lo farò! Manuela Musco (talk) 17:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Rivqy Abdul Halim.jpg

I want to delete this photo. Coz, I didnt mind to upload it Sipghotulloh Mujaddidi (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep because it's in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:28, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Nishantnengmang.jpg

No More uses Nishantneng2001 (talk) 02:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Real fruit power 2.jpg

per COM:PACKAGING ~2026-79947-5 (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Real fruit power 3.jpg

per COM:PACKAGING ~2026-79947-5 (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Arco dei Padri Costituenti

The sculpture was completed in 2009 by Arnaldo Pomodoro (1926–2025). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2096

A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

For the two non-WLM photos, the Italian copyright on these photos would expire in 2030, since the artwork was commissioned by the Municipality of Tivoli (see here). Of course the US copyright is a different issue, and applying the URAA it could expire either in 2105 (since the copyright would be owned by the Municipality of Tivoli even in the US, that'd be my guess), or in 2096.--Friniate (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
By the way, @Pascal144 and @Terramargia of course you can download your photos on your PC now and then reupload them in September 2026 when the next edition of Wiki Loves Monuments will take place. Remember to add Template:Monumento italiano and Template:Cc-by-sa-4.0 with attribution to the Arnaldo Pomodoro Foundation and you shouldn't have problems with the copyright anymore. Friniate (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
My bad, I didn't realize that since the artwork was commissioned by the Municipality of Tivoli, the authorization by the Arnaldo Pomodoro Foundation doesn't apply to it...--Friniate (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SM City Zamboanga (Construction-2026-02-04).jpg

Facade of copyrighted building under construction. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Aristorkle (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Glitter Ad With Twin Towers Burning.jpeg

https://film-makerscoop.com/filmmakers/luigi-cazzaniga/bio Cazzaniga was not a federal employee. Needs VRT permission. Based5290 (talk) 03:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Beniamino VIII.jpg

caricamento erroneo CenturioZ (talk) 14:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Project 20260206 1500479-01.png

Duplicate PeterPFar (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canal 24 Honduras.jpg

Eliminar Yovanyhn (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Eliminar suplantacion de identidad Carlosarevalohn (talk) 18:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Canal 24 Honduras.jpg

Buenas tardes se está pidiendo de favor la eliminación de este articulo ya que es de mi propiedad y fue subido sin autorización... les pedimos de favor ayuda con eliminación de este artículo ya que pertenece a Diario C24 Honduras Torresierravalle34 (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

se solicita urgente borrar ese artículo ya que se robaron la imagen Manuelenriqueh (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

soltamos eliminar este archivo pertenece exclusivamente a Diario C24 Honduras y si no es bajado se procedera a una demanda pornderechos de autor Manuelenriqueh (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

se solicita amablemente que se proceda a borrar este artículo ya que no fue subido por la empresa aquien corresponde y tiene información mal intensionada la cual esta perjudicando a la marca y empresa, si este archivo no es borrado se procedera a una demanda por robo de imagen información falsa y por robo de derechos de autor, de ante mano gracias y esperamos lo pronto posible este archivo este borrado y evitar demandas Manuelenriqueh (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy keep YOU CANT HAVE TOO MUCH Adygea9191 (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)


se solicita urgente borrar ese artículo ya que se robaron la imagen ~2026-13675-60 (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please delete this article urgently as the image was stolen, OHHHHH Altai122222222222 (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment the logo looks to me to be probably simple enough to be in the public domain in both Honduras and the U.S., so I find the accusation that the image (and an unnamed article) were stolen from you rather absurd. Further, he remark that the (unspecified) article should be deleted because no fue subido por la empresa aquien [sic] corresponde amounts to a statement that we should only host content that has a conflict of interest. - Jmabel ! talk 07:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Trato de explicar en español también, porque es posible que el nominador no lee inglés. Y favor de desculpir mi español de extranjero.
La llave del asunto es un concepto que creo que se llama en español "el umbral de originalidad." Si un logotipo es bastante simple, no existen derechos de autor. El logotipo ya puede haber los derechos de una marca registrada (como indique explicitamente la página del archivo este) sin haber este otro modo de derechos. Cuando alguién reproduje una marca registrada, se requiere indicarlo con ™ o ®, y no se permite usarla en una manera confusante acerca de la propriedad de la marca, pero se puede reprodujerla en conformidad con estas reglas.
El logotipo este está muy cerca del umbral; lo que determinaré el case estará un determinació en qué lado esté ubicado. - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
I sense that this is a continuation of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Carlosarevalohn, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canal 24 Honduras es un medio de comunicacion de Televisión y digital.jpg and the new involved users' contributions. Nakonana (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
See also AN archive: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 103#h-Repeated deletion nominations without a reason by two recently-created users-20260112111800. Nakonana (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Further somewhat weird edits on the page by nearly new User:Jairojimenez6; obviously wants it deleted, obviously has no sense of Commons' process; these edits at least border on vandalism. - Jmabel ! talk 18:58, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Similar questionable edits at File:Canal 24 Honduras es un medio de comunicacion de Televisión y digital.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 19:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Maybe the files related to Canal 24 Honduras should just be deleted because it might be out of scope. I can't find anything on the channel outside of Facebook. Nakonana (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
@Nakonana: https://diarioc24honduras.com/. Offhand, looks legit. - Jmabel ! talk 04:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
I see Google search failed me on this one, thanks for checking. Nakonana (talk) 12:23, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:JA8109.png

There are no permission for this image to uploaded Thebaldball (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Nuova strada ANAS 148 ex SS 131 (variante Località Fangario).jpg

incorrect spelling to redirect (148 instead of 48) AutobahnSpeedChaser (talk) 09:40, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File:BSicon utABZg+23.svg

Incorrectly named duplicate of File:BSicon utABZg23.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Luangdimai (Zeliangrong) Traditional Attire.jpg

It's Zeme traditional dress not Zeliangrong, my mistake, I made this picture quite long ago without knowing much. Phohoshuu (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

File name is wrong, should be Zeme traditional attire instead of Zeliangrong. My mistake, I made this file back then when I didn't have enough knowledge of Naga tribes. Phohoshuu (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Can some please delete my picture, I'm pleading for the deletion of my photo. Phohoshuu (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep invalid DR, you should just request rename this file. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Its not even my picture, I used someone else's work. Poshlinoodles (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
>own work
>someone else's work
Then  Delete, unless you give evidence what this photo is on free license SomeFancyUsername (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
So please delete it, i just found this image on Instagram and decided to use it. My mistake Poshlinoodles (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Not my image, I used someone else's work and pretended it was mine, please delete this image. Also I used Zeme traditional dress not Zeliangrong. Poshlinoodles (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, @Poshlinoodles, there is no need to start another deletion request, usually it takes up to 7 days for deletion request to be closed. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
how can i delete my image? Poshlinoodles (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
@Poshlinoodles Eventually an admin will assess the comments above and make a decision whether to delete the image. Usually this happens after 7 days of the deletion request being opened, but sometimes it may take longer, so all you can do at this point is to just wait. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Not my image, I used someone else's work and pretended it was mine, please delete this image. Also this is Zeme traditional attire not Zeliangrong. Zeliangrong have various other attires this is Zeme specific. Poshlinoodles (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Queen of Peace Church (Interior)(2019) - Norval, ON.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake JFVoll (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

File:St. Lawrence Church (Interior)(2023) - Hamilton, ON.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake JFVoll (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

File:St. Joseph Church (Interior (2019) - Hamilton, ON.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake JFVoll (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo-beach-soccer-021.png

Uploader here. This file was uploaded by mistake and violates copyright. I agree with deletion. Angelodealgostini (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

  •  Speedy keep Licensed properly now, simple text logo. --Komarof (talk) 09:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you. However, I am the uploader and I am not the copyright holder of this logo. I cannot provide a valid free license. I uploaded it by mistake and still agree with deletion. Angelodealgostini (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
    You don't need to be the copyright holder to upload simple images with missing copyrighted elements; there are plenty of such images available here. Komarof (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
    Hello.
    I understand that some simple logos may be acceptable. However, I am the uploader and I am not the copyright holder of this logo, nor do I have any confirmation that it is actually free of copyright restrictions.
    I cannot guarantee a valid free license or provide reliable proof of public domain. Therefore, I request deletion to correct my past mistake. Thank you. Angelodealgostini (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
    Here we go again… Komarof (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
    Hello. I can't confirm a free license or public domain for this file. For this reason, I request deletion to correct my previous error. Thank you very much. Angelodealgostini (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Jake bongiovi.jpg

Subido por error/posible copyright Dasoap0 (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Kızıl (talk · contribs)

Caution: this is a mass deletion request. Files that are COM:REDUNDANT, COM:SCOPE, COM:SELFIE. Each file has explanation, come to deletion request please. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 04:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

i tried to saw any small detail to save the file i check. so, these marked files are has been gone into filtration. i mostly hesitated when i put them here. and i put them accordingly COM:REDUNDANT policy. if they are in some place in wikimedia projects, or nominated for quailty photo(QI), i didnt put it here.

redundant

  1. File:Old wooden door–IMG 7297 03.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Old wooden door–IMG 7297 01.jpg( Keep). reason: 01 has wider angle. very little diffrences.
  2. File:Tekir kedi–IMG 7272 01.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Tekir kedi–IMG 7272 02.jpg( Keep). reason: 02 has better focus.
  3. File:Old wooden door–IMG 7209 01.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Old wooden door–IMG 7209 02.jpg( Keep). reason: nuclear sun go to my precious eyes in 01. 02 is better for lightning. almost same images.
  4. File:Gönen Barajı–IMG 6993 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Dam and yellow flowers–IMG 6993 03.jpg( Keep). reason: 03 is less looking for sky. the topic is about dam, not sky.
  5. File:Migrotion of great white pelicans–IMG 6710 09.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Migrotion of great white pelicans–IMG 6710 08.jpg( Keep). reason: 08 has wider angle of birds. and i believe we dont need other photo because it is created after milisecond.
  6. File:Migrotion of great white pelicans–IMG 6710 10.jpg( weak remove) redundant with File:Migrotion of great white pelicans–IMG 6710 13.jpg( Keep). reason: dispersion of birds in 13 is looking cute. and we dont need other file practicly.
  7. File:Migrotion of great white pelicans–IMG 6710 16.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Migrotion of great white pelicans–IMG 6710 03.jpg( Keep).(im unsure about which file should be deleted here, your choice) reason: birds in these files almost share same pattern.
  8. File:Pink rose–IMG 6796 01.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Pink rose–IMG 6796 02.jpg( Keep) reason: 02 is already QI
  9. File:Sunset in April–IMG 6754~3.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Sunset in April–IMG 6754~2.jpg( Keep) reason: ~2 is looking better because car on left side opened its spotlights.
  10. File:Tagetes erecta–IMG 6606 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Tagetes erecta–IMG 6606 03.jpg( Keep) reason: 03 has better contrast on background.
  11. File:Bellis sylvestris–IMG 6619 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Bellis sylvestris–IMG 6619 01.jpg( Keep) reason: meaningless crop of 01
  12. File:Hieracium laevigatum–IMG 6638 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Hieracium laevigatum–IMG 6638 01.jpg( Keep) reason: almost same image, but 01 has little more details
  13. File:Leontodon tuberosus–IMG 6648 05.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Leontodon tuberosus–IMG 6648 04.jpg( Keep) reason: 04 has better angle for ant i believe
  14. File:Geranium molle–IMG 6657 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Geranium molle–IMG 6657 01.jpg( Keep) reason: 01 has better angle i believe
  15. File:Geranium molle–IMG 6544 01.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Geranium molle–IMG 6544 02.jpg( Keep) reason: two images are same with very little diffrences, but 02 has better background because contrast i believe.
  16. File:Vanessa atalanta–IMG 6526 05.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Vanessa atalanta–IMG 6526 03.jpg( Keep) reason: 05 has no usage, but 03 at least got nominated for QI
  17. File:Vanessa atalanta–IMG 6526 01.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Vanessa atalanta–IMG 6526 02.jpg( Keep) reason: 01 has no usage, but 02 at least got nominated for QI
  18. File:Synema globosum–IMG 6486 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Synema globosum–IMG 6486 04.jpg( Keep) reason: 04 has better angle on bug i believe. very little diffrences.
  19. File:CHP İmza Kampanyası–IMG 6315 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:CHP İmza Kampanyası–IMG 6315 01.jpg( Keep) reason: no comment, both same not even redundant, it just same. but 01 is better, because looking better i believe.
  20. File:Adige costumes–IMG 6261 01.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Adige costumes–IMG 6261 02.jpg( Keep) reason: 02 in usage. both files has little diffrences.
  21. File:Turkish Folklors–IMG 6294 05.jpg( weak remove) redundant with File:Turkish Folklors–IMG 6294 04.jpg( Keep) reason: only diffrence is the guy on the front-right has diffrent pose in other image. thats why im weak remove here. also 04 is keep because i believe that image looking better.
  22. File:Rumex alpinus–IMG 6074 02.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Rumex alpinus–IMG 6074 01.jpg( Keep) reason: only diffrence is very little diffrence of focus. i choose 01 to keep because it is looking together good with File:Rumex alpinus–IMG 6074 03.jpg.
  23. File:Tavuk kedi maması yiyor 2.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Tavuk kedi maması yiyor.jpg( Keep) reason: just little diffrences. i choose "yiyor" because i believe it is better.

out of project scope, not notable

-

these files are not notable, out of project scope. both Category:Görkemli Hatıralar and Category:Serhan Asker is not notable:

  1. File:Serhan Asker–IMG 6238 07.jpg
  2. File:Serhan Asker–IMG 6238 06.jpg
  3. File:Serhan Asker–IMG 6238 05.jpg
  4. File:Serhan Asker–IMG 6238 04.jpg
  5. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6238 02.jpg
  6. File:Serhan Asker and Dursun Mirza–IMG 6238 03.jpg
  7. File:Serhan Asker–IMG 6238 01.jpg
  8. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 08.jpg
  9. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 07.jpg
  10. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 06.jpg
  11. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 05.jpg
  12. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 04.jpg
  13. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 02.jpg
  14. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 01.jpg
  15. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6212 03.jpg
  16. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 27.jpg
  17. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 26.jpg
  18. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 25.jpg
  19. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 23.jpg
  20. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 20.jpg
  21. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 22.jpg
  22. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 21.jpg
  23. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 09.jpg
  24. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 08.jpg
  25. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 07.jpg
  26. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 06.jpg
  27. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 05.jpg
  28. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 04.jpg
  29. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 03.jpg
  30. File:Görkemli Hatıralar in Bandırma–IMG 6196 01.jpg

-:-

photos in Category:36. Ömer Seyfettin Kültür ve Sanat Haftası are good. but some of them include not notable person, it is about: Category:Seda Öz Yıldız. it should be removed whole. because she is not notable.

  1. File:36. Ömer Seyfettin Kültür ve Sanat Haftası–IMG 5576 01.jpg
  2. File:36. Ömer Seyfettin Kültür ve Sanat Haftası–IMG 5576 02.jpg
  3. File:36. Ömer Seyfettin Kültür ve Sanat Haftası–IMG 5576 03.jpg
  4. File:36. Ömer Seyfettin Kültür ve Sanat Haftası–IMG 5576 04.jpg
  5. File:36. Ömer Seyfettin Kültür ve Sanat Haftası–IMG 5576 06.jpg

-:-:-

some files in Category:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu has no realistic use of ansiklopedik purpose. be aware of that, i didnt put all files of that category, some of them show culture of people.

  1. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu Sempozyumu–IMG 5373.jpg
  2. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 01.jpg
  3. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 02.jpg
  4. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 03.jpg
  5. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 04.jpg
  6. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 05.jpg
  7. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 06.jpg
  8. File:Türkiye Pomak Dernekleri Federasyonu–IMG 5371 07.jpg

thank you. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 04:08, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

File:محافظات العراق 2026.svg

مكررة عن File:Iraqi Governorates ar.svg  Mohammed Qays  🗣 07:53, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

الخريطة هي أدق خريطة للتقسيمات الادارية في العراق، وقد قمت برسمها بعد استشارة مديرية تخطيط النجف في وزارة التخطيط.
جميع الخرائط السابقة تفتقر للدقة خصوصًا حدود بغداد والنجف Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 08:55, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
الخريطة غير مكررة لاحظ حدود النجف وبغداد وصلاح الدين إضافة إلى إن الخريطة السابقة غير دقيقة في استخدام الخطوط وحدود المحافظات بالنسبة للأنهار والبحيرات Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 08:57, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
نعم، حصلت على الخرائط الأصلية من وزارة التخطيط، وكذلك خرائط الأطلس الإنساني الذي يحصل على تحديثاته من الحكومة
كذلك فإنه توجد العديد من النسخ من خرائط موقع العراق وكلها متشابهة Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 09:06, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
@Ahmadf.alabbasi تبقى الصورة مكررة يرجى تقديم طلب في صفحة نقاش الملف الموجود باللغة الانجليزية وطلب تعديلها بدل من إنشاء ملف آخر، بالإضافة لديك تسميات غير دقيقة مثل الديوانية وهي محافظة القادسية.  Mohammed Qays  🗣 07:16, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
@Ahmadf.alabbasi أو يمكنك فتح نقاش في ورشة الصور  Mohammed Qays  🗣 07:23, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
@Mohammed Qaysصوت مجلس المحافظة ومجلس النواب على تغيير إسم محافظة القادسية إلى الديوانية منذ 2018 Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
لا أخي العزيز، الديوانية تم تغيير إسمها رسميًا إلى محافظة الديوانية بدلاً من القادسية Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Statue of Koli king Vegdaji Bhil in Somnath, Gujarat.jpg

Wrong information BhiRaaj (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Walter Nicolai 0403 Märchenillustrationen, Kalif Storch, Tusche, 7x9cm, 1935.jpg

sie ist doppelt Ddbuwe (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

@Ddbuwe: Bitte keinen Löschantrag stellen. Du täuscht dich da bei der Zeichnung. Diese Zeichnung ist nur einmal vorhanden. Hab es gerade nochmal überprüft! Welche Zeichnung doppelt ist, das ist die 402 und 409. --sk (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Die 0409 soll gelöscht werden. Die 0402 (Prinzessin auf der Erbse) ist richtig und steht im common bereits an der richtigen Stelle. Die Bilder 0403 und 0404 sowie 0400 sind auch zu löschen.
ErfordelicheÄnderungen:
statt 1100-0 : Walter Nicolai 0400
statt 0401 : Walter Nicolai 0416
statt 0401 : Walter nicolai 401 Ddbuwe (talk) 17:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Partido FRI.jpg

Mal editado Corolla Tuneada (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

File:۲۰۲۵۰۹۰۳ ۱۹۲۴۰۴(۱)امزاده ابراهیم بابلسر حسین رجب علی پو ر.jpg

میخواهم درست کنم Hosein Rajabalipour (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

File:حسین رجب علی پور.jpg

باید یکی دیگر بسازم Hosein Rajabalipour (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2026 (UTC)


File:حسین رجب علی پور.jpg

همه چیز را حذف کنید تا دوباره یکی دیگه بهتر درست کنم همخهچیز را حذف کنید Hosein Rajabalipour (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Betsy Carr, 2026 SOTC.jpg

Poor wuality Packer1028 (talk) 05:56, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Human Penis Flachdach and erekt.jpg

Fehlerhafte Beschreibung ChrisJürgen (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment If the description was incorrect, it could be edited. However no objection to courtesy deletion by late (uploaded 2024) uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)


File:Nanaminei sign.png

Need to delete Asambana (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep invalid reason SomeFancyUsername (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Entrance to the ancient Sabratha Theatre.jpg

I uploaded the image and I want to delete it. -- Aws 💬 Talk 20:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:تمثال في متحف صبراته الأثري.jpg

I uploaded the image and I want to delete it. -- Aws 💬 Talk 20:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:مسرح صبراته الأثري.jpg

I uploaded the image and I want to delete it. -- Aws 💬 Talk 20:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ancient Roman theatre (Sabratha).jpg

I uploaded the image and I want to delete it. -- Aws 💬 Talk 20:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Karolína Muchova Doha 2026.webp

Copyright violation – the file appears to have been copied from the official WTA website and no evidence of a free license or VRT permission has been provided. Images from the Women's Tennis Association website are copyrighted by default and not freely licensed. Haddad Maia fan (talk) 18:55, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Rajoy en 2023.png

It probably violates copyright laws. The original source is not specified. A.piquerasm (talk) 15:14, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Because I can't delete it. Pokland (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Elis regina 1964.jpg

Sem informações Fergundis (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

reason: "Sem informações" (???) .... @Fergundis: have you taken a look at the description and license, or you're only nominating files arbitrarily? Fma12 (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)


  • Oppose. The licensing templates should be restored. They were removed without explanation, and I don't see that the nominator has explained why they are invalid.4meter4 (talk) 20:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete Not in PD. Derivative work of File:Elis Regina (1964).tif, deleted by «Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Foto de estúdio, não coberta pela URAA». LMLM (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

File:3by5 Wessex Flag with Red Trimming.svg

Requesting deletion as wish to avoid confusion with official version Rho9998 (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Wessex (30x18 with 24x16 wyvern).png

Requesting deletion to avoid confusion w official version hosted at the flag institute Rho9998 (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Wessex (3 by 5 with wyvern at 2 by 3, PMS Red 186 and Yellow 109).svg

Requesting deletion to avoid confusion with official version which is on the flag Institute website Rho9998 (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Wessex - Alternate Design.svg

Requesting relation to avoid confusion with official version available on website of flag Institute Rho9998 (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Mingyi Swa.jpg

Outdated Cepyita (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sondaggi sul referendum costituzionale italiano del 2026.png

Il file era stato creato per mostrare le percentuali dei sondaggi per il referendum costituzionale in Italia del 2026, ma ne è stata creata una migliore e più dettagliata (LOESS) e inserita nella pagina apposita. Richiedo perciò la cancellazione di questa che non è più utile. È obsoleta e di difficile interpretazione. SLeo07 (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:IMG-20201122-WA0025.jpg

Possible copyvio / bogus authorship claim, unsuitable per COM:PRP and the procedures outlined in COM:THIRD. The current filename and the lack of EXIF hint at that image having been sent through WhatsApp, which would be unnecessary for a true "own work" but quite likely it the uploaded is not the actual photographer. Grand-Duc (talk) 04:49, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I noted that the file had been marked using {{WhatsApp|rename}}. It might be worth searching for files with this template and similar file names IMG-date-WA*****, please, which also have to be categorized. NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
@Grand-Duc: You should also add the cropped version File:Torre Torre Huancayo Rocks.jpg, to the discussion. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 08:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Thanks, it's added. I missed it at first on my smaller tablet screen. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

File:The Cranberries at Roxy Bar 1995.jpg

Not PD in the US 웃OO 16:58, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

File:João da Silva Telo de Menezes.jpg

G7; Copyright Fróis (talk) 21:12, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Francisco de Melo e Castro.jpg

G7; Copyright Fróis (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Bokmässan 2025 – 236.jpg

Jag begr att filen tas bort Joelemilsson (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

390
Porträttet har vandaliserats, uppenbarligen för att avbilda en deformerad presentation. Filen tillskrivs "användaren Julle" och refereras till som listad i "Bokmässan 2026 - 238", vilket täcker följande meddelande: "filen kan inte visas" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Missing_articles_by_occupation/Writers_-_Sweden#/media/File:Bokm%C3%A4ssan_2025_%E2%80%93_236.jpg. Bilden måste tas bort. ~2026-12140-52 (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Is this machine translated into Swedish? I'm not entirely sure what "deformerad presentation" or "täcker följande meddelande" would mean. Either way, please clarify what vandalism you refer to. Julle (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:姫路市城北新町公園 馬のスプリング遊具１.jpg

同じ写真が上がっている為 Harimawood (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

I couldn't find exact duplicate(s), other than quite similar File:姫路市城北新町公園 馬のスプリング遊具２.jpg. We could delete it based on the original uploader's request. Mzaki (talk) 12:52, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Nintendo Switch and Nintendo Switch OLED - 2.svg

Poorly recreated ~2026-19067 (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

File:New Nintendo 2DS XL-2.svg

Poorly recreated ~2026-19067 (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Nintendo GameCube Controller SVG.svg

Poorly recreated ~2026-19067 (talk) 22:30, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Nintendo DS-2.svg

Poorly recreated ~2026-19067 (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

File:صورة علوية التقطت في مسجد الدولة الكويت الكبير لطفلة تقرأ القرآن.jpg

تعديل الصورة Di7ane (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Darisya Bayrağı.png

Geçerli bir bayrak olmaktan çıkmıştır Moqtader Qurahisi Apicklan (talk) 06:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Geçerli bir bayrak olmaktan çıkmıştır ve bilgiler çalıntı Apicklan (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Ben yükleyen kişiyim ve silinmesini istiyorum lütfen. Apicklan (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Uploader requests deletion (personal content) Moqtader Apicklan (talk) 18:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC)


Kept: not being current is not a reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 06:06, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Darisya Bayrağı.png

Geçersiz ve eski bayrak Apicklan (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ag-Gag Laws by U.S. State by April 2025.png

Map is geographically inaccurate and confusing with the layout of the states Rara2018 (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep If you have a file that has individually editable states (not using an ugly paint bucket tool), I would gladly take it. This is the best I have come up with so far. Flourish only allows a continuum on their maps, and I am not sure that Mapchart's (https://www.mapchart.net/usa.html) charts are copyright free. I don't think the order of the states is particularly confusing, not any more than any other cartogram on similar pages. Most people don't know state shapes or where they are (especially smaller ones like Wyoming), so at least this map has the state names on them, which other maps typically lack. Catboy69 (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

File:4 Brainrots.jpg

AI slop, only used on one idwiki user page in what seems to have been a test edit. Amberkitten (talk) 04:03, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:DALL·E painting of a machine with many gears.png

AI slop not in use Amberkitten (talk) 04:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:The Miss Eco Teen International Philippines crown went to Aklan's Beatriz McLelland.jpg

Wrong upload NhCb17 (talk) 10:23, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Biggie Small.jpg

No FOP in the US; see COM:FOP US – Howardcorn33 (💬) 15:39, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:1906 circa Heinrich Breling Ölgemälde Der Wittwer, Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover (16503).jpg

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2026 (UTC)


Done. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep License now added. --RAN (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Mahdi karabii.Big ass مهدی کرابی کونگشاد.jpg

ناراضی عکسشو گذاشتی Mahdi84mk (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

ناراضی عکسشو گذاشتی Mahdi84mk (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Angami Tribe NAGALAND INDIA 5.jpg

I am the rightful owner of this photo, someone other than me removed my logo and is pretending to be the owner of the photo. Zakie Sirie (talk) 09:56, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maria Effinger.jpg

The image was published without the permission of Maria Effinger, who was photographed. This violates her personal rights and her right to her own image. 147.142.84.42 15:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - She appears to be in a public place. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Maria Effinger.jpg

Personality Rights Kristbaum (talk) 09:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

The personal rights apply here, because the event was invitation based and not public. I was there and only now informed of this. Kristbaum (talk) 13:39, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward Could you maybe review this again? Thanks! Kristbaum (talk) 15:12, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
I am not a good choice to review this as I see "Publishing pictures of a person in a public space: Requires consent, unless it is in the sphere of Zeitgeschichte (event of public relevance)" and do not understand the subtleties. I also do not understand "I was there and only now informed of this." -- If you were there, then you must have known at the time that attendance required an invitation, so how is it that you are "only now informed of" it?" Or was it that the event was open to the public, but people who would be interested were sent invitations? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
I was in attendance at the time and not aware, but the invitation of the event was only for colleagues and former students of Hubertus Kohle.
So it can't be considered a public event and would require consent, which has not been given. Kristbaum (talk) 09:26, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
@Raymond Maybe you could help with this issue? There is no consent for this picture being available at the moment :( Kristbaum (talk) 18:37, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete because the image is unused and of poor quality. The photo doesn't do her justice. Raymond (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

File:شعار قناة الشرقية.jpg

This logo is not licensed by CC.. It is copied. هلاهل (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Two little Britain dolls of the characters Lou and Andy- 2014-07-23 10-42.jpg

Per COM:TOYS. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Colegio de Escolapios, Monforte de Lemos, siglo XVII. Foto propia.jpg

Error de edificio. Pabernosmatao (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Abdulaziz Meslat.jpg

It’s fake photo, and I don’t know who prepared this photo by photoshop Aalmeslat (talk) 00:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Probably should be  Deleted just like the other version of this image (File:Dr. Abdulaziz Meslat freemasonry.jpg). The image might be a photo montage of this. It was seemingly uploaded for self-promotion intended (?) for w:ar:عبد العزيز دحام المسلط? There may also be some sockpuppetry involved (because why would the uploader randomly post a biography on another new user's user page and user talk page?).
And then things just get strange because the filer of this DR also uploaded two images of the very same guy (File:Dr. Abdul Aziz Meslat.jpg and File:Dr. Abdulaziz Meslat.jpg). Nakonana (talk) 10:23, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
And the filer's username matches the name of the depicted person while neither of the images look like selfies. Nakonana (talk) 10:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Algunos nopales en la subida a Piña, colorada, rodeados de piedras rojas, que dan el nombre a Piña colorada.jpg

Porque el nombre del archivo es incorrecto, y tal vez porque la foto es irrelevante Ente rodante (talk) 06:44, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sardar Bajirao Jagtap Of Dewas Senior Branch.png

Privacy reason Jaywantjagtap25 (talk) 12:12, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per COM:AIIP. Omphalographer (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

File:File 0000000079bc720e95f66e33c37d2ff0.png

Duplication Riba28-maps (talk) 12:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Bandeira de Arauá SE.jpg

The flag doesn't match the one used by the municipality; the correct one is shown in the link.https://araua.se.gov.br/a-escola-municipal-laura-nascimento-costa-realizou-desfile-civico/ Riba28-maps (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Bandeira de Arauá.jpg

The flag doesn't match the one used by the municipality; the correct one is shown in the link.https://araua.se.gov.br/a-escola-municipal-laura-nascimento-costa-realizou-desfile-civico/ Riba28-maps (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sadio Mane Al-Nassr.jpg

لأنها صورة فيا روح XOB30 (talk) 12:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Fares Awad.jpg

لأنها صورة فيها روح XOB30 (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

File:صورة ابو فلة.jpg

لأنها صورة فيها روح XOB30 (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ابو فلة.jpg

لأنها صورة فيها روح XOB30 (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

لأنها صورة فيها روح XOB30 (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

File:15ο Γενικό Λύκειο Αθηνών (1).jpg

Aesthetically it isn’t satisfactory. Also there are multiple photographs taken of that same building. Apaleutos25 (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@Apaleutos25: I'm sorry, but "aesthetic" criteria aren't really a reason of deletion. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:57, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep There are only three images of the building in Commons, and quality-wise is certainly good enough to use. C messier (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:MS Španělsko 2001.jpg

Můj soukromý obrázek...my private picture Iva Habibi (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Teak stamens.jpg

Out of focus. No taxonomic, aesthetic, or other type of aesthetic value. Alexander Abair (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Albanian temple in Tugh village of Khojavand district, March 2021.jpg

Rename from the current politically revisionist title to " Church of Saint John, Tugh". Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Support see historical revisionism in relation to the title “Albanian”. This is a common revisionist tactic in Azerbaijani historiography to misattribute Armenian cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh as “Caucasian Albanian”. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep This is not a deletion reason. Use {{Rename}} if you want it to be renamed. Nemoralis (talk) 23:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)


Reply I deliberately did not use the Rename template. Given the sensitivities around the Artsakh question, I thought that the question would benefit by a fuller, more public discussion. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
@Laurel Lodged, You are currently abusing the Commons tools. This page is not intended for renaming suggestions. Zohrab Javad (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep. The source, where the photo was uploaded from, calls it Albanian temple. If you don’t like this name, you may not use this photo. Zohrab Javad (talk) 09:56, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
This has been formally classified now as a renaming discussion, not for “keeping” or “removing” the picture. Your uploaded sources are apa.az, a government press agency, and president.az, both of which are unreliable to make designation on church’s identity especially considering the revisionist misattributions in Azerbaijani historiography. Until reliable sources are shown for proof of your choice of title, it should be changed to a neutral one as suggested by OP. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 13:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
I think it would be more accurate to just write the name of the monument instead of noting what identity it has. I renamed the file. Their identities should be written on Wikipedias. Nemoralis (talk) 22:20, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep Renaming an image, for whatever reason, does not mean to delete it. – Furthermore, as a file mover I have learned not to exercise renaming requests when there is a deletion request for an image. So if anybody wants to rename an image, please do not file a deletion request, or cancel it. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
I'll cancel the request in this forum. Even though it is explicitly labelled as Rename. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Prototype wooden turan iii turret with a mock-up gun on a turan ii chassis.jpg

Copyright violation 43MZrinyiII (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Template:PD-Hungary. Author unknown, 70+. Blockhaj (talk) 11:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

File:43m turan iii.jpg

Copyright violation, this is not own work. 43MZrinyiII (talk) 16:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Template:PD-Hungary. Photo is 70+ years old, author unknown. Iirc this is outside the Hungarian Army's HQ or something like that. The shot is set up for official use. Blockhaj (talk) 11:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

File:44M Buzogányvető.jpg

Copyright violation, this is not own work. 43MZrinyiII (talk) 16:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Photo is more than 70 years old, author is unknown since this is wartime and under the Hungarian Army trials: template:PD-Hungary Blockhaj (talk) 11:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Toldi Pak 40.jpg

Copyright violation, this is not own work. 43MZrinyiII (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

This photo is more than 70 years old OrionNimrod (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
That may well be but its without proper source it's impossible to determine if a better copryright tag fits. --Denniss (talk) 23:14, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
This is a mockup by author Ádám Bíró: https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/hungary/toldi-pancelvadasz/ He started writing in the 1990s it appears. Blockhaj (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Toldi IIa.png

Copyright violation, this is not own work. 43MZrinyiII (talk) 16:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

This photo is more than 70 years old OrionNimrod (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
That may well be but its without proper source it's impossible to determine if a better copryright tag fits. --Denniss (talk) 23:14, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
This is a factory photo. It goes under template:PD-Hungary. Blockhaj (talk) 11:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

File:43M Turán III, spring of 1944.png

This image is not public domain. The photographer, József Czimmermann, died in 1977. 43MZrinyiII (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

File:مجموعة من الجنود السعوديين يسيرون خارج القصر بالرياض.jpg

The dates are inconsistent; the copyright expiration date in the United States is January 1, 1931, and the date of the photograph is 1942. Siwbdg (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Adrián Campos en una foto.jpg

No es trabajo propio (https://www.circuitricardotormo.com/el-circuit-y-la-formula-e-homenajearan-a-adrian-campos-en-el-valencia-e-prix/ - https://www.superdeporte.es/polideportivo/2021/04/21/homenaje-adrian-campos-domingo-circuit-52997791.html) XxAlanEZExX (talk) 01:13, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Suwon-map-new.png

정자3동을 정동3동으로 잘못 기록 Kcmjong (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:चितवन जिल्ला.png

Boundaries inside of this map or old vdc map is not correct. thats why as a publisher i nominate this map for deletion. पर्वत सुवेदी (talk) 04:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Флаг Киевской Руси.png

This is a fictional flag. The flag of Rus did not have a golden trident on a blue background. Yaroslav637 (talk) 06:35, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Morocco Telecom Headquarters Riyadh and Celebrating the Year 2026.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

We have a whole category of Category:Maroc Telecom HQ -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 20:50, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brasao ilhadasflores.svg

Old coat of arms, now out of use Riba28-maps (talk) 02:19, 21 February 2026 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. --Kadı Message 10:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Brasao ilhadasflores.svg

The flag doesn't match the one used by the municipality; the correct one is shown in the link.https://araua.se.gov.br/a-escola-municipal-laura-nascimento-costa-realizou-desfile-civico/ Riba28-maps (talk) 03:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Marc Bernal photo (cropped).jpg

https://bolanarede.pt/especial-bola-na-rede/atualidade/barcelona-confirma-grave-lesao-de-marc-bernal/ DarkWave19 (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Marc Bernal photo.jpg

https://bolanarede.pt/especial-bola-na-rede/atualidade/barcelona-confirma-grave-lesao-de-marc-bernal/ DarkWave19 (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Vintage Photo Collage.png

This isn’t a real collage from the 50s. It’s a collage of lolcows (internet personalities) masqueraded as such by a vandal attempting to use it to create a Wikipedia article for a fictitious singer Thebirdnird (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Robert Steeple broon (talk · contribs)

Further handwritten notes on a personal scientific theory, still out of the COM:SCOPE of Commons.

Belbury (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:AITO M9 MY2025 20260118 010 (1).jpg

Template:Detele Michael Toronto's Home (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Gutu Lemba 1.jpg

Duplicated Sanali.SD (talk) 16:56, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment. File is in use across multiple projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

File:As13-60-8588 (25208224543).jpg

Image was taken on 11 April 1970. Therefore, either correct it (please) or let it go… Apaleutos25 (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep as this is an invalid rationale. Hiàn (talk) 02:40, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

User talk:Merlin.049

Je n'aime me savoir ici Merlin.049 (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2026 (UTC)


User talk:Merlin.049

Je n'aime me savoir ici Merlin.049 (talk) 20:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

File:QPr.jpg

The UK has a lower threshold of originality than the US. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 23:56, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment. Does this fall under the new THJ v Sheridan standard for UK threshold of originality? IronGargoyle (talk) 13:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Graffiti in Tallinn

Estonia has no freedom of panorama, and this applies to graffiti.

DS (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Old lady tag (7954259908).jpg & File:Old lday tag (7952390956).jpg are works by Edward von Lõngus and we have permission covering them. There are also some files listed here where there is no artistic creation whatsoever. Kruusamägi (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
If you have permission for those (which I assume is more than just saying 'we have permission'?), then certainly, add that information. DS (talk) 12:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Lordi-logo.svg

Above COM:TOO Finland, as I believe it is not "simple and ordinary to the degree that they are not to be regarded as original works in their own regard". QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 06:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Kawa Abban – Official Portrait.jpg

You can delete it. Kawa Abban (talk) 06:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Стіна-волокно.jpg

завантажив не те фото DmitriyChaplya (talk) 10:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)


File:Стіна-волокно.jpg

завантажив не те фото DmitriyChaplya (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Tamannaah 2024.jpg

Copyright violation. Original work posted by stylist/consultant Shaleena Nathani on Instagram: (Posted on November 23, 2024) ~2026-14378-90 (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Zameer ahmed.jpg

Copyright violation. Image appeared in multiple sources: example: in swarajyamag.com on Aug 23, 2023; In thehindu.com: on July 06, 2022, with image credits to: K. Murali Kumar. ~2026-14378-90 (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete -- DaxServer (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Russian T-72A Main Battle Tank (Ank Kumar, Infosys Limited) 03.jpg

Copyright. Image on sign is not protected by FOP in Australia. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. 2D-artwork is included in the FoP copyright-exception in most FoP-countries, but not in... Australia... 43MZrinyiII (talk) 05:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Russian T-72A Main Battle Tank Shell (Ank Kumar, Infosys Limited).jpg

Copyright. Image on sign is not protected by FOP in Australia. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. 2D-artwork is included in the FoP copyright-exception in most FoP-countries, but not in... Australia... 43MZrinyiII (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:USA M115 203 MM Howitzer (Ank Kumar, Infosys Limited) 02.jpg

Copyright. Image on sign is not protected by FOP in Australia. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. 2D-artwork is included in the FoP copyright-exception in most FoP-countries, but not in... Australia... 43MZrinyiII (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Геология и перспективы алмазоносности Пучеж-Катунской зоны.jpg

This image is vertical and small, out of bounds. Куйгорож (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Граффити в Ялте, 4 июня 2013 года.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 11:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Uploader here. I do not object to deletion. FingerWiki (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erección.jpg

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)


 Delete bad Dronebogus (talk) 10:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Erección.jpg

Es innecesariamente gráfica y explícita BLKR300 (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Zaouiet Sidi Abbass ben Zaied 30.jpg

ملفة لا يحتوي على محتوى نعيم قربوسي (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

File:SandwichBillboardPhilippines.png

Copyrighted and no indicated of own work see metadata likely copyright 0x0aAA (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Selçuk üni 2021 2.jpg

düşük kalite görsel Kerem Sezen 20:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

"Görsel düz gözükmüyor ve değerli bir bilgi barındırmıyor. 08.02.2025"

Sezenkerem (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sezenkerem (talk • contribs) 20:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

  •  Weak keep unless there's a better photo of a similar view (in which case, link it). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Kept: per Ikan. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Selçuk üni 2021 2.jpg

This image is tilted and a better, leveled version of the same scene is available at File:Selçuk üni 2021 3.jpg. This file is redundant. Sezenkerem (talk) 13:48, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Hellotry.png

Self image of the user, out of scope, no educational use. COM:HOST Sezenkerem (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Walls And Gateway In Front Of Hunter Hall.jpg

Shows wrong site, see comments Frombowen (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, actually you can edit the description and request to change the file name to correct any inaccuracies instead of deleting the image. I can see the image is currently COM:INUSE in wikidata. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
This picture was used by mistake and obiously taken by mistake: it shows just an ordinary wall and gateway and not Walls and Gateway in Front of Hunter Hall. Compare the coordinates given here and on Wikidata (item Q26438517), see these places in Google Streetview, see https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1145368! I therefore removed the connections of this file to Wikidata; I know this is questionable during a deletion discussion, but the case is crystal-clear. Telford (talk) 12:24, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Bordesfoto kabinet-Jetten 2026.jpg

I unfortunately don't believe the image was the Ministry's to license. The picture is most likely made by Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst, more specifically Valerie Kuypers (see here). For the past years, the Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst has refused a free license for their photos, including the bordes scenes. The Ministry of Defence has probably just used the photo from within government, without thinking about the copyright differences (including the fact that they dont mention the photographer). Given this context, I think we should get explicit approval instead. Dajasj (talk) 23:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep it is released on a government site with valid permission from VRT. A similar case which can applies here is from this [] if we delete valid cc licence from other government websites we can delete all pictures from ministry of defence as it makes their CC licence worthless. If you upload pictures here from ministry of defence you need ask additional permission for portrait rights https://english.defensie.nl/service/copyright and we already have this. We have valid CC licence + permission for their portrait rights. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    My point has nothing to do with portrait rights. The government might not have the copyright at all ("Op foto’s, video’s, infographics en alle andere vormen van beeld is de CC0-verklaring niet van toepassing, omdat er auteursrechten van derden op rusten.") and the copyright might still be with the photographer. And if the government did have the copyright, it is most likely not the Defence ministry to license it, given that the Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst has made it and refused reuse.
    The VRT permission applies to all of the website of the Ministry of Defence (I guess), but I would assume it does not apply to pictures where the Ministry does not have copyright and thus ability to license. Dajasj (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    i can't check this but I think it is a individual permission. Shadow4dark (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    It is part of the {{Mindef}} template, so I think it is a generic one. But I will ask a VRT member for clarification. Dajasj (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    Two VRT members have confirmed on Discord that it is a generic permission, not focused in this specific image. Dajasj (talk) 07:49, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    I checked the ticket and it basically says the same as here: https://www.defensie.nl/service/copyright
    If there's no copyright claim on the website besides a photo (or text), then it falls under CC0.
    The ticket isn't an individual permission, but a general permission for text/image on the website of the Ministry of Defence. Mbch331 (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    At this page of the ministry of defense says "Voor deze website geldt de licentie Creative Commons naamsvermelding/gelijk delen (CC BY-SA 4.0)" (in short "for this website CC BY-SA 4.0 applies - with name attribution"). The exception is "Staat er bij een tekst of afbeelding (zoals foto’s en video’s) dat er auteursrecht op zit? Dan mag u het niet gebruiken" (If a text or image (such as photos and videos) is specifically copyrighted, you are not allowed to use it) - that is, in case a specific (copyright) attribution is mentioned on the applicable page or any visual in that page of the defence website. Furthermore, given the recognizable persons in the photo, "GDPR applies to photos and videos that depict individuals [...] permission must be requested via [email]". It seems to me the latter formally also applies, even though one may consider these persons not to be random individuals that would require specific permission for each and every photo. But that aspect I am not sure of. Make of it what you will, but this implies that the photo itself is free to use under the general MinDef attribution rules by means of the way it is presented on the page (ie without a specific copyright mention). That only leaves the question open whether this falls under GDPR and thus may require specific permission from the comm.dep. of MinDef. Labrang (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    Sorry for doing a long repeat of what Mbch331 already said in short... Labrang (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Labrang That was again not my point, my point is that minDef is not the organization that holds the copyright (excl portrait rights and privacy). As I understand it, it is as if you made a picture and I placed it on my website with a CC0 license without having your approval for the license. Dajasj (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    that is something we can only theorize about because we don't know that for a fact. All we know for a fact is the copyright statement and within that frame, the photo is legit to share and legit to upload on commons (except the potential GDPR clause which may not he applicable in amy case). The rest is only hypothesis, even if we would consider a certain scenario as you describe as a likely one. We haven't established that as a fact. In order to do that, we should get confirmation from MinDef. Lacking that and still concluding the photo would not be allowed to upload to commons, lacking the correct permissions, would open up disputing all MinDef photos. Labrang (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    I disagree. In this specific case there is evidence that minDef might not be the copyright holder (there are a lot of minDef photos without this doubt). To respect the copyright, we should err on the side of caution, until we establish as a fact that minDef rightfully did so. In any case, I have sent a mail to the Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst. Dajasj (talk) 00:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I think the template used is incorrect. {{Mindef}} should be replaced {{Rijksoverheid}}, which lists the raised itssues about 3rd party copyright of phones made after 2015. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/copyright provides a means to contact them about copyright: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/contact/informatie-rijksoverheid/e-mail-sturen. It might be useful to ask about the other bordesfoto's on https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/regering/over-de-regering/kabinetten-sinds-1945. Either those could be used as well or there may be more photos on Commons that have the same issue as this file. Arancycn (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
This can be bypassed if they give explicit permission for GDPR/portrait rights. However, we don't have this. Shadow4dark (talk) 19:02, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Again, this isnt about gdpr or portrait rights. A free license doesn't infringe upon these rights. This is about the rights of the photographer and/or the rights of the RVD. Dajasj (talk) 22:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
You can assume that, but you need to establish that as a fact. Otherwise you basically dispute the entire CC0 model of third party institutions. I am not quite sure that would be your intention. Labrang (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
RVD has refused the bordesfotos as recently as last month, so I see no point in that at the moment Dajasj (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
(The earlier ones are correct because the copyright statement was different back then) Dajasj (talk) 22:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
The template {{Rijksoverheid}} has a clear cut off in 2015, all newer photos require explicit permission of the RVD (and you say they're refusing it) or from the photographer (in all these cases: Valerie Kuypers). It her permission cannot be obtained this bordesfoto has to be removed as well.
 Delete, unless permission can be obtained from the photographer Valerie Kuypers. Arancycn (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I assume the same argument goes for File:Bordesfoto kabinet-Jetten 2026 (cropped).jpg, a cropped version of this image. Arancycn (talk) 09:40, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Olympique medea logo.png

شعار غير مطابق Ayoubrescia2026 (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Death in the Making (1938) title page.jpg

https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopy19653191libr/page/2324/mode/1up?q=%22death+in+the+making%22 renewal just a bit early, still under copyright in the US until 2034 I think Based5290 (talk) 20:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

  • One small correction, this photo was first published in the 10 September 1936 edition of Regards and it's subsequent publication in a New York book did not give it a valid US copyright due to having been published 2 years earlier without a US copyright notice. It was public domain in the US for many decades until it was URAA restored in 1996. It will enter PD in the US in 2032. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 23:07, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Nolan au PRJ.png

Photo datée. La personne présente sur cette photo souhaite sa suppression Nolan dt (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

File:NAZIM On a caltural Program

Misconception AZIZUL HAQUE SANY (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

File:HIMANSHI❤️.jpg

New version of it was been uploaded remove it Shubham2525 (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Big Ass Lake outline.jpg

Uploader’s request Versions111 (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Big Ass Lake with black outline.jpg

Uploader request Versions111 (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Copa del Rey por M+.png

Hopelessly blurred Rathfelder (talk) 16:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep. File in use on multiple pages. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Indian Secular Front Flag.png

It is not their official flag Soumava2002 (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Indian Secular Front logo.png

It's not their logo .. it's seems like a communal logo Soumava2002 (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Book cover 750 years of the Black Abbey.jpg

Book cover - need evidence that the publisher of the book released the cover/image under a free license. Consigned (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

No problem, go on deleting it. A.-K. D. (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Do you still have the book? Is there a credit anywhere for the cover photo? I tried and haven't been able to match it to any other historical photos of the abbey. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 21:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Езидский язык на карте2.jpg

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep if you found mistake just upload new version of the file. Spam is not allowed there. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
please elaborate: which error requires a deletion? If there is none,  Keep --Enyavar (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ēzıdixan.jpg

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:15, 16 March 2026 (UTC)


please elaborate: which error requires a deletion? --Enyavar (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Эздихан10.jpg

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)


please elaborate: which error requires a deletion? --Enyavar (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Езидский язык4.jpg

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)


please elaborate: which error requires a deletion? --Enyavar (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Езидский язык3.png

Есть ошибка Ruslan Ozmanian (talk) 12:19, 16 March 2026 (UTC)


please elaborate: which error requires a deletion? --Enyavar (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

{{speedydelete|Likely non commercial license}}

File:ΔΕΝ ΣΕ ΘΕΛΩ ΠΕΙΑ 1918 US recording.ogg

Likely Non Commercial License Kapoios2026 (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)


I am just unsure of the license's status. It originates from a recording (US 1918), however I traced it back to a community that was responsible for digitising it and they use a non commercial license for their website . In case it's CC Non commercial, deletion shall be enforced.

File:Jimbo-cohen-fashion-model-portrait-headshoot(1).jpg

Duplicate upload Deanlewis1989b (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Abu Dhabi TV (English).png

Because my other files are getting deleted MaherMahoory (talk) 06:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Baynounah Television.png

Because my other files are getting to deletion MaherMahoory (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:OMORI Emotions Chart.png

Non-free media information. Screenshot from the game Omori (link). Metra pro (talk) 14:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Dr. Pamela Ramirez - QueeNoble (cropped).jpg

Not an original image of the person Wikivisionnary (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

what do you mean by that? It is cropped and that is permitted. Isn't it? Agaath (talk) 21:17, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
@Wikivisionnary: Can you explain your request? Is it too small perhaps?--Agaath (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)


File:Dr. Pamela Ramirez - QueeNoble.jpg

Not an original image of the person. Use File:Dr. Pamela Ramirez, PsyD, PhD, MD, Psychiatrist QueenNoble.jpg instead. Wikivisionnary (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sleep Token logo.svg

Above British threshold of originality QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 19:13, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Not sure if I’m doing this right, but… why is this up for deletion? How can the community prevent that from happening?
Xx rapunzel xx (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
@Xx rapunzel xx: You can argue as to why you think this file should be kept, and/or provide counterarguments as to why you don't think it's above the British threshold of originality QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 04:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
 Comment This file may be reuploaded locally on Wikipedia in accordance to the US TOO law. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 16:25, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

File:SINAMOS Logo Peru.svg

El logo es obra de w:Jesús Ruiz Durand, nacido en 1970 y aún vivo. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:05, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

So does any of this violate the Peruvian copyright law as stated on the file? NorthTension (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
La imagen tiene copyright. El autor sigue vivo. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:43, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes but "This work was not credited or nor registered its name in the National Copyright Registry 15 years after its publication".
Is this incorrect? Can you give me something to disprove this. NorthTension (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Así no funciona. Tú debes probar que no estaba registrado, porque ante la duda no deberíamos suponer lo contrario. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 07:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Командир "Махно" на позиції поблизу села Масютівка Харківської області, лютий 2023 року.jpg

And also

Self-photos! Not own work by uploader Оля Ревуцька. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

File:කාන්තා රුවට සමාන ප්‍රතිමා.jpg

Misinformation detail introduction KSLwiki24 (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Airfields OH SW htm m378a5af1.jpg

Likely copyright violation; details copied from w:File:Hugh Watson Field, 1938.jpg except for copyright status Minh Nguyễn 💬 16:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

I had put a fair use rationale on w:File:Hugh Watson Field, 1938.jpg because the authorship (and thus the copyright status) is unclear. The Flickr account I got the image from back in 2013 has since taken the photo private. They were not the original photographer. The earliest copy I can find of this photo online is from this 2012 blog post that references a page on a postcard collector's website. (Google says the page was last updated in 2010.) Minh Nguyễn 💬 22:59, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

File:RayWilliamJohnson2026.png

The uploader has tagged this as CC0 1.0, but there is no evidence that the copyright holder has waived their rights or released this content into the public domain, as YouTube does not offer a CC0 licensing tier, it only supports Standard YouTube License or CC BY 3.0. ConeKota (talk) 07:36, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Presiden-berkunjung-ke-sang-hyang-seri-2.jpg

The file is claimed as "own work", but this is doubtful. The image depicts Indonesian President Joko Widodo during an official visit, which is typically photographed by government or press photographers. No evidence is provided that the uploader is the original photographer or rights holder. The licensing status is therefore unclear. ~2026-17725-53 (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ezra Renggana Parlindungan.svg

This signature is no longer needed, delete it so that it cannot be used by other parties. Walk in one direction (talk) 12:12, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

File:รูปสไปร์ท (SPD).jpg

Uploaded without permission Wiraphat Raksat (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Project Terror rape (Fan fiction).png

The user who created this was banned on en.wp for the article it was part of. This isn't the place for Nazi gaming fanfiction either. Sesquilinear (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Odu Onicha.png

File uploaded 21 March 2026 with no verified copyright clearance. Source links are unverified blogs. File is being used in a disputed article. Uploader has not responded to copyright tag. Request speedy deletion per Commons:Licensing policy. Olawamideos (talk) 19:46, 22 March 2026 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:58, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Odu Onicha.png

File uploaded 21 March 2026 with no verified copyright clearance. Source links are unverified blogs. File is being used in a disputed article. Uploader has not responded to copyright tag. Request speedy deletion per Commons:Licensing policy. Olawamideos (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Facebook creation 821770DF-E2DA-46E2-91FB-173164488FC2.jpg

Facebook_creation_821770DF-E2DA-46E2-91FB-173164488FC2.jpg Sherkurder 56788 (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

File:مورده إشليمه.jpg

هذا الملف ملك لي ولا لا اريد اي شخص انا يحصل عليه واريد حذفه Ajarndndn (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2026 (UTC)


File:مورده إشليمه.jpg

هذا الملف ملك لي واريد حذفه Ajarndndn (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Hassan Rouhani - September 14, 2002.png

The image looks clearly fake, I've checked even with AI tools and it said it's 99% fake Fantomato (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, this image is currently COM:INUSE in multiple wikis. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 01:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Fortunato Depero2.jpg

The image is likely a copyright violation. Taken in 1927 and possibly published later, it is an artistic creation (see https://cim.mart.tn.it/cim/pages/documenti_c.jsp?sid=4151&method=st&expand=458131&fromp=documenti_c.jsp and https://audiovisiva.org/it/fortunato-depero). According to Italian law (see {{PD-Italy}}), works of photographic art are protected until 70 years after the author's death, as the template on the file page itself claims. This means the image was protected in Italy until at least 1997, and it might still be—in any case, it still was in its source country at the time of URAA agreements, and it cannot be published here. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

  • URAA does not apply to pre 1931 works. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 23:19, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
    Oh, missed that one. We still don’t know if the copyright has expired in Italy though. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 00:16, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
    I see the photo is credited to "Abeni and Company" which I take is a studio. Is the actual photographer's name known? If not, then I tend to believe this image is public domain. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 09:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
    I cannot find a specific name, which means you might be right. However, just out of preciseness, let me remind that Italian law disciplines this based on the publication date rather than strictly the creation date (https://www.dirittodautore.it/legge-22-aprile-1941-n-633-legge-sul-diritto-dautore/), so we would have to assume the image was first published at least 70 years ago. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 16:13, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Great Blue Heron (sculpture)

The sculpture was completed in 2025 by Jeffie Brewer. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works, permission from the sculptor is required

A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pert's Vector Diagram.png

Not needed any more. Saulpert (talk) 23:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (not a recent upload). --Wdwd (talk) 08:52, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Pert's Vector Diagram.png

No record of a dual pert Welp22 (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Aprilia AF1 Sport Pro.jpg

the uploaded image is copyrighted Cagivamito125 (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:栃木県芳賀町東高橋1233-1で書かれた絵.jpg

Derivative work (Splatoon) and vandalism. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too different from Splatoon characters to be derivative work imho. --Elly (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

File:栃木県芳賀町東高橋1233-1で書かれた絵.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE Issac I Navarro (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete as a copyvio. This is COM:INUSE and it clearly illustrates both rule 34 and inklings from Splatoon. It has been useful for discussing fan art on commons. However the last two reasons (it’s clearly a drawing of an Inkling and is useful for exemplifying an ambiguous copyright situation) are exactly why it’s problematic. I don’t buy, and have never really bought, User:Ellywa’s closure in 2021; if it’s recognizable and not unambiguously below the relevant TOO COM:PRP applies. Dronebogus (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Could the work qualify as transformative? Because there could be a "new expression, meaning or message" attached to the image, as Splatoon doesn't contain such erotica. Guideline-wise, COM:Transformative works doesn't exist (as of me writing this). Design-wise, the only chart we have is File:Derivative work vs transformative work based on Wikipe-tan.png. I'll wait for more opinions.
Also, @Issac I Navarro, next time you're going to nominate several similar or related files, please follow COM:MDR instead of nominating each file separately. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 07:17, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
You really wanna gamble on that with porn of Nintendo characters? Dronebogus (talk) 07:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Sure, it's not like I'm going to be the first. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 19:09, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete Hariadhi (talk) 08:48, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Please elaborate and explain the reason, W:WP:JV. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 16:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


File:USS Midway Museum 2022 23.jpg

This is a bad quality image that I uploaded Issac I Navarro (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Nollywood Super Star Eucharia Anunobi wearing Ichafu depicting it’s elaborate and Voluminous style.jpg

Not an "ichafu" this is a gele, and the misrepresentation in these images and titles are part of a vandalism sting of AI articles and original research being dealt with on Wikipedia Dolpina (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

File:The prodigal son - rodin 075269.jpg

per COM:FOP United States - no FoP for artworks and sculptures Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. COM:FOP for the United States says 'public artwork installed before 1931 is considered to be public domain, and can be photographed freely. In addition, any public artwork installed before 1978 without a copyright notice is also in the public domain (unless the copyright owner actively prevented anyone from copying or photographing the work until 1978). The Prodigal Son in San Diego is a cast from 1905, so before 1931. In addition, Auguste Rodin died more than 70 years ago, so I think the copyright has expired(?) The copyright information (if this sculpture is public domain) should be updated to be {{PD-US}}. Zxilef (talk) 02:11, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment See Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Prodigal Son (sculpture).jpg as this file was deleted for that reason.

File:清流新岩国駅に停車しようとするNT3000形.jpg

自分で撮影したが公開を取り下げたい Y.k sj (talk) 15:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo Eveline Cosmetics.png

Plik do usunięcia, ponieważ zawiera duplikat obrazu, który został dodany innego użytkownika wcześniej DariaDX (talk) 22:57, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

File:20260323 신형 이륜차 번호판.png

삭제 후 재업로드 Lgh0428 (talk) 22:36, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Geisha-part-time-love-affair-original-version Ozydmnzr.ogg

Possible copyright violation Kapoios2026 (talk) 11:15, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Geisha-05-fool-s-way AFC0HbdQ.ogg

Possible copyright violation Kapoios2026 (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:برج سبكس.jpg

Architecture art work, not allowed in commercial use as there is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:02, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Tayeb2022 (talk · contribs)

Architecture art work, not allowed in commercial use as there is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia.

— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:04, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Jwk comics

Jwk_comics Jwk comics (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2026 (UTC)


User:Jwk comics

Jwk_comics Jwk comics (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Young Bashar al-Assad (with AK, in the middle) serving in the military, 1990s.jpg

The claimed public domain status is not supported. The file is dated only as "1990s", which is vague and not verified by the cited source. The provided source (a 2020 news article) does not give the original publication date, author, or copyright status of the image, and appears to be only a later reuse rather than the original publication. Without a verifiable publication date, it is not possible to confirm that the image entered the public domain in Syria under the claimed short-term protection for photographs. There is also no evidence that the work was already in the public domain in its source country before the URAA restoration date (1996), which is required for public domain status in the United States. Therefore, the licensing claim cannot be substantiated and the file may be a copyright violation. ~2026-19203-58 (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Syrians with portraits of Assad family.jpg

The claimed public domain status is not supported. The date is given as "1994–2000", but this is not verified by the cited source, which is a 2024 news article that does not provide any information about the original publication date, author, or copyright status of the image. The source appears to be a later reuse rather than the original publication. Without a verifiable publication date, it is not possible to confirm that the image entered the public domain in Syria under the claimed short-term protection for photographs. There is also no evidence that the work was in the public domain in its source country before the URAA restoration date (1996), which is required for public domain status in the United States. Therefore, the licensing claim cannot be substantiated and the file may be a copyright violation. ~2026-19203-58 (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A Syrian propaganda image showing Hafez al-Assad and his two sons, Bassel and Bashar.jpg

This file is claimed to be in the public domain based on Syrian copyright law, but the date is not verifiable. The source only describes the image as “undated, 1980s/90s”, which is an अनुमान or approximation rather than a confirmed creation or publication date. Such a vague timeframe is insufficient to establish that the work had entered the public domain in Syria before June 11, 2004, as required under US law. Without a verifiable date of creation or first publication, the copyright status cannot be determined. Additionally, the image is sourced from a social media post, which does not provide original authorship or licensing information. Therefore, the public domain claim is unsubstantiated and the file should be deleted. ~2026-19203-58 (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Башар митинг.jpg

The authorship claim of this file is doubtful. The image is described as “own work” taken in 2012, but it depicts a large-scale political rally in Damascus from a high and professionally composed perspective, which is more typical of press or official photography rather than a personal snapshot. Given the uploader’s history of questionable copyright claims on multiple files, there is reason to doubt that they are the original photographer or copyright holder. No evidence is provided to support the authorship claim, so the file’s licensing status is unreliable. ~2026-19203-58 (talk) 18:58, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Hafez al-Assad and his son Bashar al-Assad, 1994.jpg

This file is not in the public domain in the United States. Although Syrian law may provide a shorter copyright term for photographs, the work was published in 1994 and was still under copyright protection in Syria as of January 1, 1996. Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), copyright in such foreign works was restored in the United States if they were still protected in their source country on that date. Therefore, this image is subject to U.S. copyright. Additionally, the author is unknown, so under U.S. law the work is protected for 95 years from publication (until 2089). The source is a modern news website, and there is no evidence of a valid free license. Therefore, the file fails Commons' requirement that works must be free both in the source country and in the United States. ~2026-19203-58 (talk) 19:05, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Πεύκο ριζομένο κοντά στη θάλασσα.jpg

Λάθος ονομασία εικόνας Βασίλης Φασουλάκης (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Gare d'Orval - Hyenville.jpg

Mauvaises informations. Ce bâtiment n'est pas l'ancienne gare d'Orval-Hyenville, simplement une habitation. MaitreCapuche (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment. It seems like that would be a reason to rename and not a reason to delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Reign of Pala Empire.png

This file is an Unattributed Dublicate image of a previous version of an file uploaded by me, I had made changes because the map was inaccurate. They have also uploaded the image under a different licence. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Ilustración 3D - Interacción entre el Peso y la Fuerza Normal (entre una mesa y un jarrón).png

I made and upload the image two years ago (I recently change my name account). In the description and in the metadata, it contains personal information that relates my name with my artist username, and it appears in search engines, so I want to maintain my online privacy. The SailorEditor (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

File:La Fuerza Normal anulando al Peso.png

I made and upload the image two years ago (I recently change my name account). In the description and in the metadata, it contains personal information that relates my name with my artist username, and it appears in search engines, so I want to maintain my online privacy. The SailorEditor (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Talvisodan kansallinen muistomerkki.jpg

FOP in Finland does not apply to sculptures. The sulpture is by Pekka Kauhanen (1954-2020). Estormiz (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Audrey Amélie Mbilla.jpg

Le nom est mal écrit Simbanematick (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC)


  •  Keep fix it. --RAN (talk) 02:16, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

File:School Odintovo Crimen.png

copyright violation. this is a professional news photograph by Xinhua News Agency (logo is clearly visible in the bottom right corner), taken on December 16, 2025, at the scene of the school attack in Odintsovo. the uploader is NOT the author of this work and has incorrectly claimed "own work". xinhua does not release its contemporary press coverage under free licenses TheNightmareOfRosguill (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Syekh Abdul Wahid ash-Shalihi.jpg

Salah judul Al Asyi (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC)


  •  Keep "Wrong title", but no explanation of correct title. The date is the upload date, it needs the date corrected. --RAN (talk) 16:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Aam Janata Unnyan Party Logo.png

Duplicate file Wasiminwiki (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean? Manasbose (talk) 17:06, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:阿神签名Taiwan.jpg

Delete it Knsksnsosnsknsk8888 (talk) 06:31, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Mata vaishno devi pindi photo.jpg

This is a clear copyright violation. The image is an official photograph belonging to the Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board. Photography is strictly prohibited inside the Holy Cave, therefore, it is impossible for this to be the "Own work" of the uploader. The uploader has also used a placeholder date (1970). This image can be found on official brochures and the shrine's website. Junereads (talk) 09:41, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu Wearing ichafu.jpg

This is a picture of a Yoruba headdress called Gele, not ichafu. This user was found vandalising Wikipedia and the fake "ichafu" article was deleted. Meanwhile all the pictures of Gele he labeled as "ichafu" still remains up on wikimedia. Its best to change the file name to Gele, a Yoruba headdress, or delete them. Aside the first picture he uploaded of the women in scarfs and anklets, the rest has been Gele. Dolpina (talk) 01:10, 3 April 2026 (UTC)


The term "ichafu" is used in Igbo to refer to a head covering worn by women. While there are visual similarities between headtie styles across Nigerian cultures, including Yoruba gele, the presence of a distinct term in Igbo reflects its usage within a specific cultural context. The file depicts an Igbo woman wearing a head covering consistent with this context. Reclassifying it as gele would apply a different cultural label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremiah uduak nome (talk • contribs) 04:46, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete copyright holder likely didn't give permission to upload image there. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 17:34, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Hello, the user Deetailz removed the deletion tag on the page. This is the same behaviour that account displayed on wikipedia on the now deleted and salted "ichafu" page and vandalising other unrelated actual articles and not following rules. How do I report them? Dolpina (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Igbo woman in ichafu igbo head-tie.jpg

This is a picture of a Yoruba headdress called Gele, not ichafu. This user was found vandalising Wikipedia and the fake "ichafu" article was deleted. Meanwhile all the pictures of Gele he labeled as "ichafu" still remains up on wikimedia. Its best to change the file name to Gele, a Yoruba headdress, or delete them. Aside the first picture he uploaded of the women in scarfs and anklets, the rest has been Gele. Dolpina (talk) 01:12, 3 April 2026 (UTC)


The file depicts a head covering worn by an Igbo woman. While there are visual similarities between headtie styles across Nigerian cultures, including Yoruba gele, head coverings are not exclusive to a single group. In Igbo cultural context, such head coverings are commonly referred to as "ichafu". The intention of the file description is to reflect its usage within Igbo attire rather than to misidentify Yoruba gele. If there is concern about terminology, the file description can be adjusted to a more neutral wording such as "Igbo woman wearing traditional ichafu head covering" rather than asserting it is specifically Yoruba gele. The term "ichafu" is used within the Igbo community to refer to this form of head covering.
There is no evidence that the file is incorrectly attributed to the cultural context in which it is presented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremiah uduak nome (talk • contribs) 04:27, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Thats a picture of a Gele, a Yoruba headdress. Also why your "ichafu" article got deleted and salted on wikipedia. Dolpina (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:JAS Malaysia logo.png

The current public domain claim appears to be incorrect. This logo is stated to be from 1997, which does not meet the requirement for Malaysian government works to enter the public domain (50 years after publication). As of now, it is still under copyright. Additionally, the source provided (official website) does not indicate that the work is released under a free license. Malaysian government websites typically retain copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. Therefore, the licensing status is likely invalid and requires review. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 10:14, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Painted Portrait of an Igbo Woman in Traditional Regalia Featuring Ichafu Nnukwu and Aka Coral Beads.jpg

This is a picture of a Yoruba headdress called Gele, not ichafu. This user was found vandalising Wikipedia and the fake "ichafu" article was deleted and salted. Meanwhile some of the pictures of Gele he labeled as "ichafu" still remains up on wikimedia, while I've reported and had some taken down. Its best to change the file name to Gele, a Yoruba headdress, or delete them. Dolpina (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ichafu.jpg

This is a picture of a Yoruba headdress called Gele, not ichafu. This user was found vandalising Wikipedia and the fake "ichafu" article was deleted and salted. Meanwhile all the pictures of Gele he labeled as "ichafu" still remains up on wikimedia. Its best to change the file name to Gele, a Yoruba headdress, or delete them. Dolpina (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Eze Obi Ossai and wives wearing Ichafu with wrappers and elephant tusk Ivory (Odu).jpg

Submitting this for deletion due to misinformation. This is from a children's book, not an important drawing from 1841. (Also added later: User was caught in vandalism on Wikipedia and their collaborative article they called was deleted and salted.)Dolpina (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

What children's book have you found this in, @Dolpina? There is also File:Image of Obi Ossai, King of Aboh.jpg, the same image with different information. Sourcing for both is unclear. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
I'd have to dig for it and ask, because the image popped up on twitter like a week back, same image but in full, with text and question and answer underneath the picture, of the manner of Nigerian children fiction reading books. Dolpina (talk) 19:53, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Aro Confederacy.svg

Submitting for deletion because it is a self made flag which never existed in any sources. Dolpina (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:AsanumaJiroPuppy.jpg

毎日新聞社のフォトバンクからの転載。1957年に撮影された写真そのものの転載ではなく、管理番号を含む形で後年に撮影された写真の転載であるため、著作権保護期間の満了が確認できない。 Taisai429 (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Igbo woman with ichafu.jpg

This is a picture of a Gele not "ichafu". This is from a set of vandalism and canvassing that took place from Wikipedia and got salted. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=prev&diff=1346712503&markasread=346259752&markasreadwiki=enwiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ameerah1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ichafu_(headdress)_(2nd_nomination) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dangermanmeetz 1Dolpina (talk) 21:00, 3 April 2026 (UTC)


Object to Deletion: File:Igbo woman with ichafu.jpg

​I am the uploader (or a primary contributor to the associated entry), and I strongly object to this deletion. ​Linguistic Context: This image was uploaded specifically to illustrate the Igbo term ícháfụ́. As documented in the 1906 CMS Dictionary and 1913 Thomas Report, this term refers to a specific style of head-tying indigenous to the Igbo people. ​Educational Purpose: Even if the nominator disputes the specific style, the image serves a vital educational purpose under COM:SCOPE. It provides a visual reference for the "spread and wind" (cha + fụ) method described in the etymology. ​Neutrality: A disagreement over whether a headwrap is "ceremonial" or "daily wear" is a matter for the File Description, not a reason for Deletion. I am happy to update the metadata to be more descriptive, but the file itself is a valid contribution to African textile documentation. ​Verification: I can confirm that this image accurately represents the headwrap as worn in Southeastern Nigeria (Ikeduru/Owerri regions). ​Recommendation: Keep the file. If the nominator has concerns about the caption, we can reach a consensus on the wording without destroying the media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmbata (talk • contribs) 12:16, 4. Apr. 2026 (UTC)

File:Placa esmaltada de la Calle de San Martín de Puerto de Vega (Navia, Asturias).jpg

Error en el enunciado Martín Andariego (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Placa de la Calle del Arroyo del Armón de Puerto de Vega (Navia, Asturias).jpg

Error en el enunciado Martín Andariego (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prof. Dr. Gotthard Teutsch.jpg

Dies ist kein "own work" des Einstellers, sondern ohne Angabe und Freigabe des Urhebers (Fotograf) eine URV Jbergner (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Kept: Uploader claims numerous contributions as own work on user page. As I could not find this photo via TinEye, I don't have any proof of copyvio. —holly {chat} 18:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Prof. Dr. Gotthard Teutsch.jpg

Copyright Violation. The Person died in 2009 NDG (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

The deletion has been requested before, the file was kept. Giving the uploader’s mode of action (uploading third-party work as own work, then trying to get a permission and even if successful not attributing the true author), small file size, low resolution, missing EXIF, false date, this is not own work. --Polarlys (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Connie Talbot, 2019.jpg

Because appears private information. Johnny Escobio (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Connie Talbot, 2019.jpg

It appears private information. Johnny Escobio (talk) 15:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Comment, @Johnny Escobio, per previous DR, I think your reason for deletion is not specific enough. Can you perhaps elaborate on what the problem is?
  • Do you mean the file name contains private info? You can request a rename instead of deleting it.
  • Do you mean the image contains private info, such as the signature? You can upload (overwrite) a new version of the image with the private info removed.
  • Do you mean the metadata (EXIF) contains private info? You can edit the EXIF data of the file in your computer. Then, same as above, you can upload (overwrite) a new version of the image with the edited EXIF data.
This is because the image is COM:INUSE in fr-wiki and your current reasoning is not enough for this image to be deleted. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  • This appears to be a case of free license regret. Uploader appears to have blanked his user page and left the project. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 01:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Kept: per previous DR, license cannot be revoked unilaterially. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:23, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Connie Talbot, 2019.jpg

We don’t want this file on the web Nathangames7 (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep no valid reason. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 09:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
 Speedy keep per above, no valid deletion reasons provided. The nominator's account was created today, and the only actions they did were blanking and nominating this image for deletion. Therefore, it's unclear how the nominator is related to this image. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 15:10, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
The image appears to be derived from this source on TVTropes (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Music/ConnieTalbot), which is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA and not acceptable on Commons. JaydenChao (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
I strike out my vote above, since it is clear the drawing is a derivative work. I don't think TVTropes is the copyright holder of the photograph, but anyways there are no evidence the original photo is freely licensed. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Connie_Talbot,_Johnny_Escobio_.jpg, out of scope JaydenChao (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cisy Castle 2026.jpg

Dublet przez pomyłkę Pistulka (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:COMEDYCENTRAL SOUTHPARK 2705 HD 3391890 1920x1080.jpg

Screenshot of copyrighted TV show Crow Basket (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Many other south park episode pages have pictures of the episode TheDailyWall (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pascual Ortiz de Ayala y Huerta.jpg

The image looks dirty and I misidentified the individual this is a nephew of his Angel Ortiz de Ayala not him (Pascual Ortiz de Ayala) Jerryacutedoggy (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

COM:RENAME can correct it for you. Just click the rename script and click hashtag #3 or #1. I can do for you xx LuvsMG481 (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2026 (UTC)


  •  Keep Correct the name and keep. --RAN (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
    I've already completed it. Just close the discussion and get it out of the way LuvsMG481 (talk) 13:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Division General Hernán Terrazas Céspedes landing in Brazil.jpg

Out of scope: purely personal photos from family album. Boliviano1952 (talk) 21:56, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Division General Hernán Terrazas Céspedes.jpg

Out of scope: purely personal photos from family albums. Boliviano1952 (talk) 21:58, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:General Terrazas white uniform.png

Out of scope: purely personal photos. Boliviano1952 (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:General Hernan Terrazas and his son, Adolfo.png

Out of scope: purely personal photos. Boliviano1952 (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:General Terrazas and his daughter.jpg

Out of scope: purely personal photo. Boliviano1952 (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:General Hernán Terrazas Céspedes in 1975.jpg

Out of scope/“: purely personal photos. Boliviano1952 (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Celebration of General Hugo Banzer’s birthday.jpg

Out of scope: purely personal photo. Boliviano1952 (talk) 22:04, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:General Hernán Terrazas sitting down.jpg

Out of scope: purely personal photo. Boliviano1952 (talk) 22:04, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ste WC97.webp

This file is claimed as "own work", but depicts a photograph from the 1997 FIFA U-20 World Cup. The authorship is doubtful, as no evidence is provided that the uploader actually took the photograph. Given the nature of professional football events, such images are typically taken by accredited photographers and are unlikely to be freely licensed. No verifiable source or proof of permission is provided. Therefore, the copyright status is unclear. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 07:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pitabangan aniv-vert.svg

No evidence that the logo was officially released under CC0 by Wikimedia Malaysia. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 09:08, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Apologies in advance for the sarcasm but it is utmostly hilarious and undeniably uproarious if not at the very least humourous that a file uploaded by a board member of Wikimedia CUG Malaysia, used on official pages of the user group, which is also part of the Wikimedia movement who promotes free license uploads and especially CC0, still requires so-called proof that it was officially released under CC0 by Wikimedia Malaysia. Idk, perhaps you can ask Wikimedia Malaysia about it, I'm sure they'll be shocked to say the least that someone has uploaded their work to Wikimedia Commons of all places without their permission. EmpAhmadK (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:PERKESO logo.png

Incorrect public domain claim; logo likely still copyrighted in US; no valid free license ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 09:44, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Doremart logo.png

Unclear copyright status. The logo includes stylized text, a graphical symbol, and slogan, which may exceed the threshold of originality. The current PD-textlogo claim may be questionable and requires community evaluation. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Mao Zedong with Emperor Haile Selassie I.webp

Likely not in the public domain in the United States. Although the work may be public domain in China (published in 1971), it was still under copyright in its source country on 1 January 1996. Therefore, its U.S. copyright was likely restored under the URAA and remains protected for 95 years after publication (until 2066). Additionally, the metadata indicates AFP as a credit/provider, suggesting possible third-party copyright ownership. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 10:29, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Edgar Snow and Ji Chaozhu and Mao Zedong and Lois Wheeler Snow.jpg

This file has insufficient source and licensing information. The image is sourced from a website (china.org.cn, 2013), which is not the original publication. The original author is unknown, and no evidence is provided regarding the first publication or copyright holder. Although it is claimed to be in the public domain in China, this cannot be verified without identifying the author or determining whether it is a work of a legal entity or an individual. Furthermore, as the work was created in 1970, it was still under copyright in its source country on 1 January 1996. Therefore, its U.S. copyright was likely restored under the URAA and remains protected for 95 years after publication. Fails Commons requirement of being free in both source country and the United States. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 10:33, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Le Duan with Chinese politicians.jpg

This file has insufficient source and licensing information. The image is sourced from a news website (dwnews.com), which is not the original publication. The original author is unknown, and no reliable information is provided about the original source or copyright holder. Although it is claimed to be in the public domain in China, this cannot be verified without identifying the author or determining whether it is a work of a legal entity or an individual. Furthermore, as the work was created in 1970, it was still under copyright in its source country on 1 January 1996. Therefore, its U.S. copyright was likely restored under the URAA and remains protected for 95 years after publication. Fails Commons requirement of being free in both source country and the United States. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:伟大领袖毛主席和他的亲密战友林彪副主席在中国共产党九届中央委员会第二次全体会议上.jpg

This file is claimed to be in the public domain in China as a work published in 1970 by Xinhua News Agency via People's Pictorial. However, no evidence is provided that this work is in the public domain in the United States. As the work was published in 1970, it was still under copyright in its source country on 1 January 1996. Therefore, its U.S. copyright was likely restored under the URAA and remains protected for 95 years after publication (until 2065). The file lacks a valid U.S. public domain rationale and thus fails Commons licensing requirements. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 10:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Шарфадин.jpg

ошибка в изображении Ruslan Ozman (talk) 11:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

User:SuperSonicGabriel

I just want to delete it SuperSonicGabriel (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your page is blank why do you want to delete it mate? LuvsMG481 (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Suspension bondage demo at FSF 2013-03.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep part of a longstanding series documenting a notable event. It’s not particularly good but I don’t want to make life difficult for reusers who cite this to Commons. Dronebogus (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
File:Suspension bondage demo at FSF 2013-02.jpg, seem to be the only one under other versions to have a realistic use; as it shows it in a clear way. Issac I Navarro (talk) 04:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Dendy - Emma - ejaculation.png

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Weak delete illustrates w:yiff but we have plenty of superior yiff already. Dronebogus (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Regardless of usefulness, this image has a copyright problem. Catendy's page on Baraag states that the works are licensed under CC BY-SA, but the exact version is not specified. Ideally someone needs to contact the artist for clarification, though he has last posted in 2020, making it unlikely that he will ever respond. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 10:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foxie color.jpg

Out of scope. Clearly fails COM:NOTHOST and COM:EDUSE. Swarm (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

This is obviously an unclear reason provided by a person who does not like furry fandom. -- Meow 09:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
It's one of the two images provided with permission by Bert (Max Cooncat), fairly well-known artist in yiff community. There are not so many works related to yiff on Commons, and the reasons for the removal of these files is not clear to me. — putnik 10:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 Keep per w:Furry_fandom#Sexual_aspects. Yiff is covered in Furry fandom, which has 27 interwiki. High-quality artwork/notable topic. Been here since 2007... INeverCry 04:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Foxie color.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

sorry, but In 2026, it got deleted because it is in furry fandom, and nudity. you can't go back to 2007 updates.
BYE BYE. 2007 - 2026 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazar Horzhiy Sergiyovich (talk • contribs) 14:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Category:Yiff still has quite a few images, and this particular one is almost unique because all the others have female characters. It's interesting to see the Commons:Nudity link here, because there's absolutely nothing on it that suggests the image should be removed. In my opinion, this is a protest nomination without any proper reasoning. — putnik 14:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Under Related policies and guidelines, it states that "Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host: Commons is not your personal free web host", While this image has been on this platform for a long time, it doesn't appear to have much of a use. Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep we don’t have a whole lot of male yiff Dronebogus (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)


File:On Display.png

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity, COM:VULVA Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:04, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete blurry Dronebogus (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep this is a well categorized high quality photo of the category Pubic hair on female human genitalia within the project scope! It's not blurry but plays with the depth of field. Also the forenamed policies apply not. --Ras67 (talk) 17:57, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Sexual Intercourse.png

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity, COM:VULVA Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete low quality Dronebogus (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep this is a well categorized high quality photo of Penile-vaginal intercourse within the project scope! The forenamed policies apply not. --Ras67 (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
No it isn’t. It’s extremely dark and the color balance is way too yellow. The act of penetration isn’t even visible. We are also not lacking in images of people having sex. Dronebogus (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
The lighting expresses the mood and is art. The penetration is clearly visible and the quantity of high quality pictures is also not an valid rationale. --Ras67 (talk) 01:36, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete Not a good one. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Pioneer Park (San Diego) plaque of names 02.jpg

File:Pioneer Park (San Diego) plaque of names 01.jpg is a photograph of the same thing. Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Chastity Device.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity, COM:PENIS Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:13, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete low quality Dronebogus (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Chris challe adult diaper.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

{{Vk}} The image is used. Please, find an appropriate replacement before nominating based on scope issues. Ankry (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Would File:Diaper fetishism.jpg be a suitable replacement? As it is used on the es Wikipedia and usage on wikidata:
Q1328245. Issac I Navarro (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
OK. Replaced. Ankry (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete the alternative image is superior Dronebogus (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2026 (UTC)


File:DiaperRashCandida.png

Is an explicit image of a child Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:38, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep It is an image of a disease, which should be an exception. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
    I am sure that there are more encyclopedic options that don't involve an actual child. While, I can understand that COM:NOTCENSORED, there is also, COM:PORN and Commons:Nudity, the concern that I have, is that it appears to be an actual child. Issac I Navarro (talk) 04:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
    How does one have pictures of diseases that only involve babies not be of a baby? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
    Since the primary subject of this matter is the disease itself, I do not necessarily see why an explicit image would be preferred. Unless I am mistaken or missing something; would File:Neonatal Rash Groin.png not be more appropriate? While I understand that COM:NOTCENSORED, and the image does includes a censored black bar covering the exposed area.
    While I concur with,
    @Dronebogus, @Enyavar, and yourself that the intention is to illustrate a disease. However, my concern has been COM:CHILDPROTECT Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
    There are plenty of similar images of diaper rash online by many reputable sources. There is nothing that contravens COM:CHILDPROTECT here. Next do we need to put black strips on the genitals in these pictures? Or pixelate Cupids as they are children?
    Many folks do not realize how severe diaper rash can become. And thus we see parents very concerned as it is often presented only as a mild rash. Ie the image is educational. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:43, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep per the arguments by James: the individual is not recognizable; and I don't want to imagine who would consider images of disease as porn. --Enyavar (talk) 12:57, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
    While I agree that it is illustrating a disease. Thus, making the subject of the image the disease. The concern that I have that it features a child per COM:CHILDPROTECT Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep this is not pornographic unless you are a pedophile. The child is unidentifiable so there is no dignity concern. The main audiences for this image are probably going to be parents/guardians of small children and pediatricians, not sexual degenerates. Dronebogus (talk) 18:05, 8 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Lê Minh Hưng.png

no this is not the uploader's "own work" Hwi.padam (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lê Minh Hưng 2026.jpg

no this is not the uploader's "own work". obvious copyright violation Hwi.padam (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:BDSM Ball Gag.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic encyclopedic use. There are better quality images on this subject Issac I Navarro (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep COM:INUSE within commons; quality is not unusably poor Dronebogus (talk) 18:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)


User talk:Cosimo ugolini

useless and not necessary Cosimo ugolini (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)


User talk:Cosimo ugolini

useless and not necessary Cosimo ugolini (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Raja garam ibrihim abraham.png

Because it's not important Sieghart 4108 (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pranavdevp.m dubbing artist (88671).jpg

Copyright violations, see small text at the right side. sk (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete - as per nom. Clear copyvio.
DesiBoy101 (talk) 10:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Alfredo Corell.jpg

Es una foto muy antigua. No corresponde con su imagen actual Gramabar (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep No reason for deletion. We tend to keep historical images too, and image is legitimately COM:INUSE Btrs (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Czu MLP clop Wikimare.jpg

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

A PNG version of this file is available Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

deseo eliminar ambas, como comunicador y fotógrafo quería mostrar el avance del rock en el país pero la calidad de la imagen y el sentido me hacen considerar toda la sección actualmente irrelevante, debido a que yo subí la foto espero de todo corazón su ayuda para eliminarlas Rodrick Icaza Solórzano (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
 Comment - The above comment is talking actually about these files: 1, 2, 3. It is not about this DR.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amogus502 (talk • contribs)
Mi español anda poquito oxidado, pero creo que estás hablando de música.
Esto es, Clop explícito con la frase «dominio público», que puede entenderse como un doble sentido referido a la cosificación sexual. Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you @Dronebogus for the comment. Above, in my comment in Spanish, I stated a similar statement. Issac I Navarro (talk) 00:11, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
 Comment No opinion on this as a DR, but I should warn anyone stumbling upon this that the image is a NSFW pornographic image of a cartoon horse’s anus and vagina. Dronebogus (talk) 16:56, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
The PNG file is not only larger resolution, but also doesn't contain artifacts (since the compression is lossless).  Speedy delete per COM:F8, after the VRT transfer of course. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 18:57, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
 Info @Amogus502 placed the VRT tag on File:Czu MLP clop Wikimare.png. Not sure if this counts as proper "transferring", though. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 17:29, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
Well, I did it expecting a VRTS member's review or something lol Amogus502 (talk) 04:15, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
 Comment - Before deleting this file, it will be necessary to "transfer" the VRTS tag.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amogus502 (talk • contribs)


File:Mohamad Faiz Azmi.jpg

The uploader has uploaded multiple versions of what appears to be a professional corporate portrait, all claimed as "own work". However, the images resemble official or corporate publicity photos and no evidence of authorship is provided. It is unlikely that these are self-produced works. ~2026-20589-44 (talk) 03:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:En-HotWheelsWorldRaceVideoGame-article.ogg

Low quality reading in every sense ChemicalSkylines (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Trippie Redd Photo by Kris Knesel.jpg

Photo missing VRT confirmation. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Unlikely to be proved since user who uploaded image is inactive (see User talk:Black Kite#Appealing to you for advice on Wikipedia, where other relevant info is). User @Shoot for the Stars is requesting deletion in order to promote their own image (see Talk:Trippie Redd#Photo and edit summaries on Trippie Redd on Wikipedia). I believe the deletion request should be denied – Keep. [links to the places I recommend: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Black_Kite#Appealing_to_you_for_advice , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trippie_Redd#Photo , https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trippie_Redd&action=history] Scientelensia (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
It might also be noted that @Shoot for the Stars has an extensive history of not understanding the way this site works (creation/deletion): https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shoot_for_the_Stars&oldid=970874233 Scientelensia (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Fwiw, from 2019 credits the pic with Commons. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Trippie Redd Photo by Kris Knesel (cropped).jpg

The photo is missing VRT confirmation Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Why is VRT needed? There is metadata, it appears to be of the subject (a performer) at a concert/event and I do not see any original publication preceding this. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Eva Charles Mwambene.jpg

Copyright Violation, picture shows uploader NDG (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Aissamichael68.jpg

No raison Benaissa68 (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Speedy delete due to being previously published by IMDb and I've tagged it accordingly Duckmather (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Grand Commander Sri Guru Ajanubahu Rao Dhan singh ji Ahir Rao of Charkhi Dadri.jpj.jpg

false information about Rao Dhan Singh Ji as he was not ans Ahir whereas he was a Gaur Brahman of Charkhi dadri Nirbhaypratapsinghrao (talk) 06:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep No valid reason for deletion. If the information can be corrected it should be; if there's a question about copyright or the license, and it cannot be fixed, then deletion may be appropriate. Tcr25 (talk) 14:43, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:ChatGPT Image 2. sep. 2025, 20 41 23.png

Likely AI slop Kapoios2026 (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SyroMalabar logo.png

Error image MathZach (talk) 17:52, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Muammar Gaddafi in 1972.jpg

Possible copyright violation. Although tagged as public domain under Libyan law, this image appears to be part of a published magazine layout (Cyrene Magazine), suggesting it is not a simple non-artistic photograph eligible for the 5-year term. If treated as a collective or published work, the applicable term would likely exceed 5 years, meaning it may not have been in the public domain in 1996. This raises concerns under the URAA regarding its copyright status in the United States. Additionally, the source (Alamy) does not provide verified copyright information. ~2026-21728-37 (talk) 17:52, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Muammar Gaddafi in 1972 (cropped).jpg

Possible copyright violation. Although tagged as public domain under Libyan law, this image appears to be part of a published magazine layout (Cyrene Magazine), suggesting it is not a simple non-artistic photograph eligible for the 5-year term. If treated as a collective or published work, the applicable term would likely exceed 5 years, meaning it may not have been in the public domain in 1996. This raises concerns under the URAA regarding its copyright status in the United States. Additionally, the source (Alamy) does not provide verified copyright information. ~2026-21728-37 (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lee Teng-Hui signature.png

Remove this Webbjunior (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Youth in briefs.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, the image is very blurry Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Weak keep I agree this is blurry, but I could see this image being used to illustrate this style of clothing Duckmather (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
    The other two images in Category:Sexuality in Croatia, seem to be the same style of clothing. Issac I Navarro (talk) 04:55, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


 Weak keep Guys, you decide, but can you delete this file too? --Valentino Križanić (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:5 365 - Krysti without glasses (2186799942).jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep Looks like a perfectly fine own-work photo to me; could be used to illustrate what this person's hairstyle or clothing style is Duckmather (talk) 04:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ball Stretcher Device.jpg

Poor quality, blurry image Bebop7 (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

  •  Keep Poor quality, blurry image... that is in use. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 12:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
  •  Keep, image is within scope and free-use. -- Cirt (talk) 04:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

If you search "Ball Stretcher", you'll find better images in Commons. This image is not "a little" blurry, but way too blurry. I don't see the point to collect such images in Commons. -Bebop7 (talk) 11:47, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

All that is irrelevant, the image is in use. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Kept: INeverCry 00:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ball Stretcher Device.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity, low quality image Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete low quality Dronebogus (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep per COM:INUSE. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isabelle Claudine ZEH Maire de la Commune de LEMBE YEZOUM.jpg

Oui le drapeau sur la le bandeau du maire de Lembe est en l'envers. Le vert généralement est en haut et non en bas. Simbanematick (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Oui le drapeau sur la le bandeau du maire de Lembe est en l'envers. Le vert généralement est en haut et non en bas. Simbanematick (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Isabelle Claudine ZEH Maire de la Commune de LEMBE YEZOUM.jpg

Cette photo à un problème au niveau de l. Étoffe du Maire il est en l'envers et pas normal au vu de la législation Camerounaise Simbanematick (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Isabelle Claudine ZEH Maire de la Commune de LEMBE YEZOUM.jpg

Je suis Simbanematick auteur de cette photo nous avons remarqué il détaille sur le bandeau Cette photo à un problème au niveau de l. Étoffe du Maire il est en l'envers et pas normal au vu de la législation Camerounaise Simbanematick (talk) 14:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Isabelle Claudine ZEH Maire de la Commune de LEMBE YEZOUM.jpg

Demande de suppression pour mettre une autre Simbanematick (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Bare Buttocks of early 20s mixed-race female.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)


  •  Keep High quality anatomical image. --RAN (talk) 17:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete neither high quality nor anatomical. Clearly just pornographic. Dronebogus (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Stickers in Ramat Gan, September 2024 51.jpg

File:Stickers in Ramat Gan, September 2024 40.jpg, shows the same thing in better quality Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Stickers in Ramat Gan, September 2024 43.jpg

File:Stickers in Ramat Gan, September 2024 40.jpg, shows the same thing in better quality Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:11, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Stickers in Ramat Gan, September 2024 41.jpg

File:Stickers in Ramat Gan, September 2024 40.jpg, shows the same thing in better quality Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:11, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Chenspec has a pattern of uploading the same image multiple times, each with a different weird color filter that makes the file realistically unusable for an educational purpose. I have nominated dozens of them for deletion, but it looks like I didn't get them all. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Photographs taken on 2026-03-18

Flag and coat of arms of Alice Springs, Australia. However, this files doesn't have a permission from VRT or probably copyrighted, therefore the insignia are not public domain.

TentingZones1 (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ernest H. Wright, Sr. bust; Founder of Pro Kids Golf Academy 01.jpg

Ernest H. Wright, Sr. bust; Founder of Pro Kids Golf Academy 02.jpg is better Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Montgomery High School's office building (2).jpg

File:Montgomery High School's office building (1).jpg is better Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:41, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Bar Yehuda House in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 62.jpg

File:Bar Yehuda House in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 61.jpg, seems to be the same thing Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Israeli flag at Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 28.jpg

File:Israeli flag at Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 27.jpg, seems to be a better quality image Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:50, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Shelters and protected spaces in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 36.jpg

Per COM:HOST Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Shelters and protected spaces in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 33.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Shelters and protected spaces in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 32.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:59, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Shelters and protected spaces in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 20.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:59, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:British police station at Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 14.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Signs at Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 53.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Shelters and protected spaces in Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 38.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Signs at Kibbutz Yagur, May 2024 57.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Weak delete due to having too low of a color palette to be meaningful, and due to the exact combo of the same Hebrew-language text and the same icon used on the sign being repeated several times over in Category:Smoking prohibition signs in Israel Duckmather (talk) 06:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2024-05-21 10-Jahres-Feier Vorbereitung vom Team Wikipedia Hannover 2.jpg

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung durch den Hochlader, Benutzer: Bernd Schwabe in Hannover. Es handelt sich bei diesem Bild zweifellos nicht um ein Selfie und der Benutzer (dem hier Meldenden persönlich bekannt) ist auf dem Bild im hinten Teil des Raumes zu sehen, kann also nicht gleichzeitig der Fotograf, also der Urheber sein. Folglich muss eine andere Person Fotograf und damit Urheber sein. /


This appears to be a case of incorrect licensing by the uploader, User: Bernd Schwabe in Hanover. This image is clearly not a selfie, and the user (who is personally known to the person reporting this) can be seen in the back of the room in the picture; therefore, he cannot simultaneously be the photographer, and thus the copyright holder. Consequently, another person must be the photographer and therefore the copyright holder, Lutheraner (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2026 (UTC)


No. It is my own composition. Thank you for your attention. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 11:41, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:栃木県芳賀町東高橋1233-1で書かれた絵 2.jpg

Derivative work (Splatoon) and vandalism. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too different from Splatoon characters to be derivative work imho. --Elly (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

File:栃木県芳賀町東高橋1233-1で書かれた絵 2.jpg

Per Commons:Nudity, and copyvio Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:21, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete only on copyright basis; the image is widely, legitimately COM:INUSE and therefore clearly in-scope Dronebogus (talk) 05:38, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete Hariadhi (talk) 08:47, 19 April 2026 (UTC)


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Silicone Butt Plug.jpg

In my opinion this picture does not provide any useful information and i consider it as pornography. i also doubt, if the person is informed about this picture is uploaded at wikipedia with the full face. 2001:16B8:2CCB:7400:84F:A1E0:9ED7:91F8 11:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

  •  Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
    • "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut." Turning deletion discussions into battles is not constructive. --Fæ (talk) 11:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep This picture demonstrates the use of a Butt-Plug w:de:Analverkehr this contradicts the argument useful and worthless.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 20:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep I do not see a good replacement image (standing women, butt plug and face all can be seen). Taivo (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep The image appears to be used legitimately at de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analverkehr#Schmerzen, however, I would only vote to keep if the image description of "I could wear this all day long" is changed to something more encyclopedic. DeNoel (talk) 07:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
I see the image description has been removed, thus I've removed the "Conditional" from my 'Keep' vote. DeNoel (talk) 06:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep Image clearly in scope. Tm (talk) 02:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
  • The only valid issue here is whether the subject consented. The image does appear to have been taken in a private place. I have added {{Personality rights}}; if we could get enough information to add {{Consent}} (with the appropriate parameter), that would be great. Brianjd (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Silicone Butt Plug.jpg

I asked for a split to see if the version in-between the original upload and actual version must be deleted. E4024 (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@E4024: It should be possible to do this without a {{Split}}. The intermediate version’s uploader has been indefinitely blocked; we should check their other reverted upload as well. Brianjd (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
You can remove it. --E4024 (talk) 11:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Kept: split done by Sreejithk2000: the other file is at Silicone_Butt_Plug_(2).jpg. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Silicone Butt Plug.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:28, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete the first two deletion discussions were clearly invalid, but the image is actually very low quality and doesn’t illustrate the topic at all Dronebogus (talk) 05:40, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Ahegao example.png

Bad quality, the image is blurry Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy keep COM:INUSE Dronebogus (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Changing to  Delete per user I’m not technically supposed to interact with (Hopefully the admins will agree that this doesn’t constitute a violation of the spirit of the Iban) Dronebogus (talk) 05:05, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete, likely a copyvio per COM:PCP. This was uploaded by a disposable account who made 4 total edits in all projects, 2 of them uploading this image, 1 adding it to an article (while removing a better representation of the same subject) and the other one by vandalizing an article about a random middle-aged Tunisian man . The file has no metadata, so I'd argue that's just a clueless, poor woman who has been harassed by having a sexually suggestive photograph of her uploaded here without her consent. Yacàwotçã (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
    "poor woman who has been harassed" On what evidence? This is just blatant pure speculation Trade (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
    "per COM:PCP": no metadata, racist vandalism on frwiki, disposable account, etc. I wouldn't trust this account Yacàwotçã (talk) 01:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Belle Delphine - ahegao face.png

Bad quality; the image is blurry. Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep useful as it illustrates a popular celebrity performing a memetic facial expression. Dronebogus (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep per COM:INUSE. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Hiroshi Imano.jpg

It should not appear in Google search results. Thank you. JuanAntonio37 (talk) 01:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment Request is by the uploader; image is their only upload, from October 2025. Unused, uncategorized. Stated reason for deletion doesn't seem to make sense, but may be out of scope? Is this actually a 2025 image you created yourself? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Vampetaço 3000 a aventura continua.png

Uploaded as vandalism while editing the Portuguese Wikipedia. Polomo (talk) 03:24, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sissy Maid foot worship.JPG

Image has prominent watermark, so concern is quality Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Kept: In use. INeverCry 20:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sissy Maid foot worship.JPG

There is a watermark. In addition, the image is low quality. Issac I Navarro (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete unusably poor Dronebogus (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


File:MaleChastity.gif

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity, low quality image Issac I Navarro (talk) 05:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 09:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Giant cycle pants attack by joanhonekawa dbn3bre.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic encyclopedic use. Issac I Navarro (talk) 05:53, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Matt Rader.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Roga Gabucan.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Matt Rader 2.jpg

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Rader judging.png

Per COM:HOST, there doesn't seem to be much a reasonable educational use Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:07, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Dave Dobbyn (cropped, blurry).jpg

The image is low quality. Issac I Navarro (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Akumkaba lkr.jpg

Deletion request == I would like to request the deletion of this file. I uploaded this image when I was under 18 years old and did not fully understand the consequences of making it public. Now I am concerned about my privacy and would like this image to be removed. This is my own work, and I kindly request its removal for personal privacy reasons. Thank you. Akumkaba (talk) 11:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Akumkaba lkr.jpg

Deletion request == I would like to request the deletion of this file. I uploaded this image when I was under 18 years old and did not fully understand the consequences of making it public. Now I am concerned about my privacy and would like this image to be removed. This is my own work, and I kindly request its removal for personal privacy reasons. Thank you. Akumkaba (talk) 11:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Nazi austria flag (not historical).png

Out of scope: unused hypothetical flag variation mixing the Austrian and the German Nazi flag. Enyavar (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Grand Egyptian Museum 2025 (57645).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Egypt A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

@A1Cafel Although Wikimedia Commons was founded in 2004, the issue regarding (no FoP) in Egypt only emerged seven months ago, following concerns about the interpretation of Egyptian law on panoramas. This came after thousands of such images had already been uploaded from Egypt between 2004 and 2025. Ibrahim.ID, a filemover and image-reviewer on Commons, took part in discussions on FoP and explained the reasons behind this confusion. I encourage you to review the discussion, as a misunderstanding of the law could lead to the deletion of thousands of existing images, as well as future uploads. Thank you.
@Ibrahim.ID I would appreciate it if you could join the discussion.Amr F.Nagy (talk) 06:44, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep We have previously stated in (DR) discussions that the Egypt FOP status was changed in last September unilaterally without clear consensus. The other user did not provide any evidence (In Egyptian law) that FOP is not allowed in Egypt, but rather offered a personal interpretation that was not supported by any other party, We formally requested to wait until we could contact the legislative authorities in Egypt to obtain an explanation, but no one gave us that opportunity. and based on that, he changed the politics page on his own. Please do not delete the file until we continue the discussion, because it is unfair to delete files for a particular country based on the opinion of one person.--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 15:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hong Tianguifu.png

File is identical to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E6%B0%91%E5%9B%BD%E6%97%B6%E6%9C%9F%E7%AB%A5%E5%85%BB%E5%AA%B3%E4%B8%8E%E5%B0%8F%E4%B8%88%E5%A4%AB%E7%BB%93%E5%A9%9A%E7%85%A7%E7%89%87.jpg. I highly doubt this image shows Hong Tianguifu, since this image's uploader provided no source for it.t Oakchris1955 (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


  •  Keep If you have evidence that the file name is incorrect present it. Otherwise it is a crop of a valid image we already host. --RAN (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:World Map Satellite (painted).png

Powtarzanie zdjęcia Grnz26 (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)


Pease be precise: which photo's copyright do you see infringed? If there is none,  Keep --Enyavar (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Signature of Japanese public bath artist Morio Nakajima at bottom-ceft of Mount Fuji painting in Roppongi Hills.jpg

Per COM:SIG Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep easily readable text signature, thus not eligible for copyright protection in view of COM:SIG Japan. Mzaki (talk) 09:30, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:PH-NL Connections (2021).pdf

Tagged as copyrighted. Copyright © 2022 by the Embassy of the Philippines in The Hague - All Rights Reserved. - Published by the Embassy of the Philippines in The Hague - Laan Copes van Cattenburch 125 2585 EZ - The Hague, The Netherlands --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 05:52, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Guillermo Olin.JPG

Es información ya no disponible Memoolin (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2026 (UTC)


Información ya no disponible Memoolin (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Kid in the urban Himalaya.webm

It's uploaded by mistake. It is family video. Would like to delete it. Laluttam (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Leninskoe znamya 15-05-1964.jpg

Likely copyright violation. Newspaper from 1964 (Soviet Union) is unlikely to be in the public domain. The provided source link is dead (404), and no evidence that the work is released under CC BY 4.0 by the copyright holder. ~2026-21728-37 (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Diario C24 Honduras.jpg

Buenas tardes, dias o noche a todos, se solicita la eliminación de este archivo que ha sido subido sin la devida autorización y es una información duplicada y d Franciscomanuel34 (talk) 01:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Diario C24 Honduras ®️.jpg

Con mucho respeto y admiración a todos por su valioso trabajo me dirijo a ustedes como equipo responsable del periódico Hondureño Diario C24 Honduras, en base de protección de datos se solicita con mucho respeto y cariño la eliminación de este archivo ya que ha sido subido con información falsa ya que el director del medio no es mexicano de nacimiento y por esa información falsa pedimos de favor nos ayuden con esto porque se está difundiendo información incorrecta y dañina para la vida personal del comunicador y esto le puede perjudicar para viajes o futuros proyectos Franciscomanuel34 (talk) 01:13, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Cascadia (Doug flag, 1994–present).png

This version of cascadian flag is copyrighted ~2026-53238-1 (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo of the Bhumjaithai Party.svg

Converting to regular deletion request while discussing about the boomerang parts of the logo. Ahri Boy (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

@Wutkh, the map of Thailand is too simple to be copyrighted, I dunno about the boomerang parts of the logo. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:34, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the discussion initiative. The previous upload (same logo with party's name) has been removed due to the same reason (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhumjaithai Party Blue Logo.svg), above COM:TOO#Thailand. --Wutkh (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


File:Nudist girl.jpg

Flickr source says: "Sometimes The Bikinis Come Off Particularly on the boat." So this was taken in a private place. Also, subject is not famous or anything, just a girl, image would have been deleted as "Commons is not for your vacation photos" if she had had some clothes on. 95.199.16.147 23:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

  •  Keep - this doesn't appear to have been taken on a boat to me, looks more like a lagoon. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
  •  Keep, agree that it indeed appears to be a lagoon. -- Cirt (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
  •  Delete Seems to be an isolated place. I think the case could be made that there was an expectation of privacy, so it should be deleted in accordance with COM:PEOPLE. Handcuffed (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment - This is not offensive, seen worse on discovery channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.168.177.25 (talk • contribs)

Kept: Denniss (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nudist girl.jpg

Photo d'un modèle potentiellement mineur (image à caractère pédophile) 2.5.229.82 14:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

  •  Keep Image clearly of a adult, as you could saw if you werent trying to dig and find images to play the pedhopile card. Or you have a preverted mind (be it of religious extremism or any other extremism) to see pedhopile in a clearly adult nude model. Tm (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Keep There's not really any reason to think this young women is less than 18. And even if was the case, let's recall that underage nudity is not always a source of pedophilia (I'd also say there's some kind of perversion to think so). There are many examples of acceptable children nudity on Commons, especially when it comes to treat subjects like nudism, which is not a question of perversion nor pedophilia, or ethnographic subjects (yeah, let's not forget that nudity is a form of taboo in our occidental societies - and other societies like the arab-muslim world - but is considered differently by other cultures !). In this case, it's clearly an illustration of nudism. Therefore no problem. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nudist girl.jpg

Fails COM:EDUCATIONAL nudity in private setting. No educational use per COM:SCOPE and COM:NUDITY. File raises concerns because subject is young enough concerns issues regarding pornography in today's climate and past deletion requests do not reflect current enforcement standards regarding privacy and sensitive imagery. LuvsMG481 (talk) 06:29, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Kept: In use so clearly in scope; kept twice previously; no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Nudist girl.jpg

Looks quite possibly underage, easily identifiable, unclear if consensual. I reported it to a child exploitation tip site, if they couldn't investigate if it was deleted, that's the only reason I can see not to delete it. Cgeeves (talk) 21:52, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

At least the "consensual" argument is moot. It's a long-standing, widely accepted and sensible practice to assume consent when a person depicted is clearly posing to have their picture taken, see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Evidence of consent.
Furthermore, a Google reverse search brings up https://www.elitebabes.com/model/martisha/ - it's a photosite for erotic models, by the look of it. There, it's stated that the model was born in 1990. This alleviates the "being a minor" concern too.
BUT - there's an issue: https://www.elitebabes.com/pin/martisha-in-domai-set-perfectly-shaped-girl-at-the-lake-2/ You can see a complete set with the same model and scenery, not only one still, so it's not totally excluded that the Flickr user committed FLICKRWASHING. Our upload is a mirrored version. But the Flickr account is dead.
I tried to examine the case through the Internet Archive, but the image was tagged R-18, so obviously not archived; and I saw a notice that the user had retired from Flickr by June 2013.
I don't know what should prevail: SCOPE, Flickrreview and upload chronology to allow a keeping or COM:PRP and some circumstancial hints at COM:FLICKRWASHING, resulting in a deletion? Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:30, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete per COM:PRP and Grand-Duc.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:10, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
I forgot to mention that our upload is older than anything I found with the reverse image search, though. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
@Grand-Duc: Perhaps our uploader did not get enough play from here and then cashed in via elitebabes.com   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:36, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete per above discussion. While suspicions of Flickerwashing are uncertain, for this one IMO precaution should prevail; we have a good number of verifiably free licensed photos of women nude outdoors in nature so I don't see we'd loose anything in particular by deleting this one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
  • I  Oppose closing this DR as "deleted per nom" because the nom is complete nonsense. But as uncovered by Grand-Duc, it's concerning that the photo is part of a series. Yes, Elitebabes.com appears to be dated 11 October 2014 (so newer than our 2012 upload), but it's not uncommon for 18+ sites to change (domain) name, re-release old content and/or sublicense content. As such, per Grand-Duc,  Delete. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Safwan ibn Yahya al-Bajali.png

This file has been replaced with a higher quality version and is no longer needed. Usuli Shia (talk) 08:33, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Masturbation10.jpg

low resoluted, low quality image of a mans penis. {{We have enough of them}} --D-Kuru (talk) 07:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

 Keep And you neglect to mention that it's in use. There's no need to delete a free picture in use, even if it's only on a user page.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I outsourced all images from Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the male genitalia (2009-12-21) to their own deletion request and I just forgot to copy the text. I wrote on the page alread mentioned "Images like Masturbation10.jpg and Testicles-1.jpg are in use but their usage is may be disputed: Masturbation10.jpg for example is currently used on it:Utente:Ghia/Sandbox3 and on and the descrition says "Questo utente si fa le seghe..." which would be ruffly translated "This user is jerking off" "
Even COM:PS says that a small amout of non-educational images are allowed for all users I don't think that some kind of I use my own penis image so that it don't get deleted is kinda that what that rule was made for. (Yes I've noticed that the usernames aren't the same, but that does not have to mean anything)
--D-Kuru (talk) 23:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
It's also used on , the user page of a reasonably active user. We loose in good will far more than we gain by running around deleting perfectly good pictures people are using because they're "low quality".--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
We run around deleting perfectly good pictures because they are low in quality, but when it comes to usage, we end up disputing rationales because "they are in use in user space", without even thinking about how useless they would be in one one of the Wikimedia projects. There are plenty of images like these with better quality, so the odds of me choosing this one for Wikipedia are too low to keep on Commons.  Delete. ZooFari 02:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
It is good for the Commons if people upload pictures to it instead of to the local projects. One way to discourage that is to delete images that they're actually using, in which case they will often stop using the Commons for anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Keep Ronald Reagan famously said, "If you have seen one Redwood, you have seen them all." Some of those who wish to prune back the project's collection of images of human sexual organs seem to have a similar attitude, "If you have seen one woodie, you have seen them all." I do not believe that to be true, or anywhere close to being true. I agree with the idea of not letting the commons become a porno repository. But I think our collection is far short of that level. So, this nomination, and several dozen others, were nominated in a group, and that group nomination was overwhelmingly rejected. Then our nominator makes several dozen separate nominations -- without making any effort to draft separate nominations for each image. Frankly that is disturbing. Sorry, that was a similar, but different mass nomination. Geo Swan (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

 Keep Poor quality, but in use. --Simonxag (talk) 13:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Kept. In use (Portál:Sexualita) -- Common Good (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Masturbation10.jpg

The image is blurry. Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:56, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy keep in use Dronebogus (talk) 03:08, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep per COM:INUSE, as it should be the case with AI images, whether or not the image is adequate and of sufficient quality is to discussed on/with the respective project members, not here. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep it is in use. Nothing more needs to be said.--Prosfilaes (talk)

File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration Animated.GIF

The image is low quality, furthermore, there doesn't appear to be a realistic COM:EDUSE, also per Commons:Nudity, COM:PENIS Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:05, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete low quality Dronebogus (talk) 03:08, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Unused, low resolution without evident compensating value. Human sexuality is within project scope, perhaps this was the best illustration we had of male ejaculation when it was uploaded in early 2007, but we now have multiple much higher quality alternatives. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

@Dronebogus and @Infrogmation, Would making a separate deletion request for the below files be wise?
  • File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration.ogv
  • File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration Still Frame.jpg
Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:11, 18 April 2026 (UTC)



I really don't see the point for going after properly licensed files from the early days of this project, just because there is some higher quality version of something like this around. This has been kind of innovative 20 years ago. If it is used somewhere else and this file is linked to this upload, I don't see why we should remove this record.  Keep --Polarlys (talk) 18:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep This has a long history of use on various projects. I see no reason to delete it and partially break the history function on those projects.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:39, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Teenboy upper body - right.jpg

There doesn't seem to be an encyclopedic use Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete also underage, but this at least doesn’t really qualify as child porn Dronebogus (talk) 21:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Morbid Gorgeous Girl.png

Possible copyright/trademark violation Kapoios2026 (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Cannot verify uploader's claims of the image being their own work. Kapoios2026 (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cristofanetti.jpg

Other picture Artlife93 (talk) 02:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Cristofanetti.jpg

La photo a été modifié par ia je voudrais la remettre mais en photo originale Artlife93 (talk) 02:57, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pasaporte colombiano 2026.jpg

I create a new version of this passport Rpou08 (talk) 05:37, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Senator John Curtis Official Portrait 2025.jpg

[no reason given] Zatony156 (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Maila 2026-04-07 2300Z.jpg

ToS change email from the JAXA P-Tree team explicitly says data before February 2026 is "limited to non-profit purposes, such as research and education", which is not allowed on Commons. Francisco Padernal (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

although your upload image is JAXA P Tree system is not allowed on commons because is copyrighted Francisco Padernal (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Narelle 2026-03-19 0540Z.jpg

ToS change email from the JAXA P-Tree team explicitly says data before February 2026 is "limited to non-profit purposes, such as research and education", which is not allowed on Commons. Francisco Padernal (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

because JAXA P TREE SYSTEM images is not allowed on commons because is copyrighted. Francisco Padernal (talk) 16:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Rap maroc.jpg

اريد حذفها لانها صورة قديمة Syoufzan9a (talk) 16:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Syouf Zan9a fans.jpg

اريد حذفها لانها صورة قديمة Syoufzan9a (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Outside COM:SCOPE.
These are all affected too (delete all) if anyone has time to merge all of these into a single DR. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:28, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Syouf Zan9a Dar Chabab.jpg

اريد حذفها لانها صورة قديمة Syoufzan9a (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Rap maroc -rapmaroc -SyoufZan9a -rap.jpg

اريد حذفها لانها صورة قديمة Syoufzan9a (talk) 16:26, 14 April 2026 (UTC)


File:TextbookTwinkExample.jpg

UUnencyclopedic. Also images on top are unfree Nurken (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Photo of bengali biggest cultural festival.jpg

Because it has watermarak Knowshow2006 (talk) 19:31, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:IPhone 11 iOS 13.5.1 Home Screen.png

Falsche Lizenz Msldr00 (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:山岡 重厚.jpg

Copyright; G7 Fróis (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Chest of a male.jpg

Słaba jakość zdjęcia Grnz26 (talk) 23:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Meotians in 100 CE.png

Быстрое удаление Джунгарик228 (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep No policy-based reason given for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Dendy - Emma (reference).jpg

Possible copyright issue Issac I Navarro (talk) 03:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

see the description in the artist's profile: "All drawings under the license CC-BY-SA".  Juwan  🕊️🌈 03:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Indeed, it's licensed under CC BY-SA; but, the exact version is not specified. That is the primary concern that I have. Would you suggest contacting the artist for the specifics? Issac I Navarro (talk) 04:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
not sure if I will be able to. the latest post on the account is from 2020.  Juwan  🕊️🌈 09:58, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak delete not immensely useful regardless of copyright issues Dronebogus (talk) 07:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:হোয়াইট শিল্ড বাংলাদেশ এর লগো.jpg

because I want to delete it. this institution is not working Prince0121 (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Jimmy Bondoc 2x2 half body picture.jpg

Bondoc was not a government official when this picture was presumedly taken. So this is not public domain. Wilson Palacpac III (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Seminal fluid.jpg

Low quality, there are better images on Commons Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 07:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Semen in condom 2.jpg

The image is so low quality, it makes it difficult to understand what it is attempting to demonstrate. I don't see any realistic educationally useful for this image. Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 07:15, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

]]

File:SlavkoKolar.jpg

Requested for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Youth in briefs.jpg, by User:Lord Valensus Issac I Navarro (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Хьажи Дауд Муьшкуьрви.jpg

Картина без автора и с непонятной внешностью. Если добавляете картину Хаджи-Давуда, то есть картина дагестанского художника Магомеда Дибирова. Это картина должна быть удалена. Vendettaaa (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete This file is a screenshot from a YouTube video and is therefore subject to copyright protection. There is no evidence of a free license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. It is a non-free derivative work and does not meet Commons’ requirements. This file should be deleted. DigitalSpace (talk) 11:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vietnamese boy penis.JPG

Com:penis Dronebogus (talk) 10:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Kept: Decent quality, been on commons for 10 years. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Vietnamese boy penis.JPG

Per Com:penis, there doesn't appear to be anything noteworthy or special that would indicate an educational use. Issac I Navarro (talk) 21:26, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy delete subject may have been underage at the time Dronebogus (talk) 07:15, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
 Keep. Decent quality, has been in Commons for 14 years. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Dand Nammon Yoshi Fursona.jpg

There doesn't appear to be an educational use for this image Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete as nom. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 07:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Nagorno-Karabakh Republic National Assembly 2005.svg

Wrong year Nguyenduong2601 (talk) 03:05, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Altar of Nations by Oksana Mas in Kiev - center.jpg

And also

No FoP in Ukraine. Author - Oksana Mas. Uploader is not author. Микола Василечко (talk) 03:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

It is not necessary to apply the freedom of panorama here because there is no depiction of copyrighted art in the photographs despite the fact that they depict the work by Oksana Mas as indicated in their description. The individual parts of the installation are reproductions of the parts of the Ghent Altarpiece, which is in public domain. Individual pysanky, from which the panels were assembled, and which were crafted by Oksana Mas, are not displayed in the photographs. The whole installation itself serves the purpose of displaying the panels and is not an artwork by itself. I am the author of the photographs. Роман Рябенко (talk) 07:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gaggedmanimage2.jpg

Una imagen que viola los derechos de autor LolaPerez66 (talk) 06:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure if/how this violates copyrights, but it's an image of a person known for being a fetishist who enjoys displaying his taped face to the public (exhibitionism).
There has been a consistent effort by serveral accounts to maintain this picture on the Wikipedia:Gag and Wikipedia:Gag (BDSM), with the person in the photo flaunting the Wikipedia page on his social. I think it's clear this photo was uploaded and is being used in articles for the purpose of sexual gratification. Banhxuavicu (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Andreslence75 (talk · contribs)

AI generated images (watermark bottom right corner). There are other and better images of these vehicles that were not generated with AI.

זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 07:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Athens metro Elikonos 2-2023.jpg

It is too old, let other users upload new photos Elikonos (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep What is it with some folks here who believe that Commons is just a repository of only the most up to date stuff? There is nothing like "too old" here. We are collecting documents of history! Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:某学校书房的江、胡、习牌坊.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Map of Sikh Empire (1845).png

Appealing to show some procedural over takening of the same pictorial depiction which not on what it's been decisively harming the old cartographical representation which was used under the free to use scheming of a CC 0 licence content and non sensical error is under discussion on the talk page All*lost\nul(zero) (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep I cannot understand what you have written here. There is no discussion on any talk page that I can see. These edits do not appear constructive. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:800 qxb9fc.jpg

This media depicts Jeffery Epstein as "The first femboy" NiratLover (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Snibblöja.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE for this image. Issac I Navarro (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Wellston 23.png

Uploaded with wrong title Stoss78 (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Wellston 22.png

Uploaded with wrong title Stoss78 (talk) 19:57, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Wellston 21.png

Uploaded with wrong title Stoss78 (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Wellston 03.png

Uploaded with wrong title Stoss78 (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Man in thong8.jpg

There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE, this is a low quality image. Issac I Navarro (talk) 01:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)


Files uploaded by Abcmemories (talk · contribs)

Uploads of ten graffiti messages in the same handwriting that the uploader claims to have personally found by chance in the streets around their home. Whatever is going on here seems out of COM:SCOPE.

Belbury (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Busto de César Vallejo.jpg

No Freedom of panorama in Ecuador ~2026-53238-1 (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pénis érection comparaison.jpg

See COM:PENIS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 13:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Pénis érection comparaison.jpg

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

Not the greatest quality, there appears too much digital noise to be useful. Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Dronebogus (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)


File:India West Bengal State Assembly 2026.svg

personal use Roryowen (talk) 03:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sodorstan Election.svg

removal of personal work for personal use Roryowen (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pripadnici 1. mehanizirane bojne Tigrovi (cropped).jpg

Derivative work by uploader. Incorrect crop that adds no educational or informational value and is unlikely to be useful. Inferior derivative. Persian Meowth (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Pripadnici 1. mehanizirane bojne Tigrovi (cropped).jpg

Derivative work by uploader. Incorrect crop that adds no educational or informational value and is unlikely to be useful. Inferior derivative. Persian Meowth (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Najveći vojni mimohod u povijesti Hrvatske završio preletom devet Rafalea I (cropped).jpg

Incorrect crop of an existing image. A better, correctly cropped version of the same image already exists on Wikimedia Commons. This file is redundant and adds no value. Persian Meowth (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Derivative work by uploader. Incorrect crop that adds no educational or informational value and is unlikely to be useful. Inferior derivative. Persian Meowth (talk) 10:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pripadnici 1. mehanizirane bojne Tigrovi II (cropped).jpg

Derivative work by uploader. Incorrect crop that adds no educational or informational value and is unlikely to be useful. Inferior derivative. Persian Meowth (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Pripadnici 1. mehanizirane bojne Tigrovi II (cropped).jpg

Derivative work by uploader. Incorrect crop that adds no educational or informational value and is unlikely to be useful. Inferior derivative. Persian Meowth (talk) 10:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Converge at Knust Hamburg.jpg

Banner says Converge but this is not Converge on stage. Must be a band opening for Converge OliveBreizh (talk) 14:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Penis des Menschen im "schlaffen" Zustand (unbeschnitten).JPG

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

Low quality image that is not in use. Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Sobita Gautam, ministry first day, welcomed.jpg

This file was taken from the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs (Nepal) website. The site does not declare a Creative Commons license and shows a standard copyright notice. Because no free license is provided at the source, the file does not meet Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements and should be deleted. CNn21 (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Passenger accommodation scheme RA-0257G.png

Это точно ваша работа? Выглядит как рисунок из расследования МАК. И источник сведений? Lestest (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RA-0257G 13.12.09.png

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RA-0257G SM-92T Severka.jpg

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RF-01219 MAKS-2005.jpg

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RA-76723 Privolga1.png

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RA-76723 Privolga3.png

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:RA-76723 Privolga2.png

It is highly doubtful that this is own work. Lestest (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Utah-License-Plate-Arches-448WAE.jpg

I don’t want this on wikipedia anymore. 58CC (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SeaSunset bw.jpg

falta datos copyright TomossQAOVOT (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Likely not own work. The image depicts a 1989 award event (Anugerah Bintang Popular Berita Harian) and appears to be a scanned or reproduced press photograph. No verifiable source or evidence of authorship provided by uploader. ~2026-21728-37 (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Emrah KILINÇ.jpg

File:Emrah KILINÇ.jpg Bilgitapınağı (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Denis Law - Printfield mural 1 of 2.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Denis Law - Printfield mural 2 of 2.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sex Matters logo.svg

Not certain it meats the UK threshold of Originality. LunaHasArrived (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not confident enough to take a firm keep/delete position, but this does not seem an obvious case either way. I uploaded it in good faith, as the design appears mostly textual with a limited stylized element, but I understand why the threshold question is being discussed. --GloBoy93 (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Human Circumcised Penis.png

This is my file. I want it to be deleted. I cannot delete the file as an author cause I lost the account. Jimmy257 (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Human Circumcised Penis.png

This is my file and I want it to be removed please Jimmy257 (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Buttplug 3.jpg

Photo has no encyclopedic value, see Commons:Nudity.--NL19931993 (talk) 03:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

 Kept, normal quality. I blocked the nominator indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Buttplug 3.jpg

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature. There seems to be a bit of digital noise also the orange filter on this image makes what it is trying to demonstrate a tad unclear. File:Buttplug 1.jpg, another image apart of this set is more clear and without the filter. Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete low quality Dronebogus (talk) 23:08, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Melissas labia majora.jpg

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature. There doesn't seem be a realistic COM:EDUSE. The quality of the image is not the greatest due to the lighting. Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:36, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

 Delete low quality Dronebogus (talk) 23:08, 19 April 2026 (UTC)


File:Stele at the entrance to Verkh-Neyvinskiy.jpg

Хочу удалить по собственному желанию собственное фото (неудачно отфотошоплено небо, которое перекрывали провода). Gr (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Tapegag-mia-gag 01.jpg

Imagen que no sirve en wikipedia LolaPerez66 (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Tapegag-mia-gag 02.jpg

Imagen que no sirve en wikipedia LolaPerez66 (talk) 03:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Tapegag-mia-gag 03.jpg

Imagen que no sirve en wikipedia LolaPerez66 (talk) 03:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Tapegag-mia-gag 04.jpg

Imagen que no sirve en wikipedia LolaPerez66 (talk) 03:26, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Opar David.jpg

Not applicable Opar Dave (talk) 07:09, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Princekushwaha418 (talk · contribs)

Low quality images of unidentified subjects in unidentified locations with no meaningful titles or descriptions; therefore, outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:DOHA Morocco 03.jpg

I uploaded the image by mistake when i was young, please delete it Mahta oussama (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Церква на честь митрополита Андрея і священномученика Климентія Шептицьких.jpg

And also

No FoP in Ukraine. Building after 1990. No Permission from the architect Боднар Олег Ярославович. Микола Василечко (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Доброго дня. Я - Андрій Стадницткий - є керівником релігійної організації (https://opendatabot.ua/c/25229264), у власності якої перебуває дана споруда. На жаль, архітектор Боднар Олег Ярославович уже помер, тому й дозвіл надати не може Andrstad (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Chennai Super Kings 2026.jpg

An image downloaded from the web (various sources including Instagram), with no attribution of being free to use. No EXIF for proof of ownership. Acabashi (talk) 08:49, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration Still Frame.jpg

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

See, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration Animated.GIF Issac I Navarro (talk) 08:59, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

History
Issac I Navarro (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


  •  Keep There are no reasons given to delete this file. It is still in use on several pages, albeit not mainspace ones and has a long history on Commons.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration.ogv

May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

See, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration Animated.GIF

History


  •  Keep I see no reasons to delete this. At this point in time, it is in use on

   Usage on bcl.wikipedia.org
       Pagluwas nin kasit
   Usage on en.wikipedia.org
       Talk:Ejaculation/Archive 2
       Talk:Ejaculation/Archive 4
   Usage on gl.wikipedia.org
       Pene
   Usage on gu.wikipedia.org
       વીર્ય સ્ખલન
   Usage on mni.wikipedia.org
       ꯇꯤ
       ꯐꯝꯄꯤ ꯆꯠꯄ
       ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ:Mayek Bot/Test/Bangla/তী
       ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ:Mayek Bot/Test/2/তী
       ꯕꯦꯡꯒꯂꯤ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ:তী
   Usage on ta.wikipedia.org
       விந்து தள்ளல்
   Usage on test.wikipedia.org
       User:নকীব বট/Test/Mni/তী
   Usage on tl.wikipedia.org
       Pagpapalabas na panlalaki
   Usage on wuu.wikipedia.org
       射精

. We do not make editorial decisions for other projects.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:34, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Oswald Mosley and Diana Mitford (35638188926).png

This is not Diana Mosley (nee Mitford). There is no proof she ever wore BUF uniform and additionally bares no similarity to Diana. Note eyes and cheeks. Pwg98 (talk) 01:22, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Menara BCA dengan latar bangunan Thamrin Nine.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gama Tower & Trinity Tower (62971).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gama Tower.jpg

FoP in Indonesia prohibits commercial use. Canopus Grandiflora 03:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

  •  Delete per nominator. Modern copyrighted building. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 23:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gama Tower.jpg

Indonesia has no FOP 96.48.140.119 18:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 Deleted, recreation of content deleted by community consensus. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gama Tower.jpg

This architectural work was completed in 2015, and designed by PT Sekawan Design Inc. who died on November 29, 2008. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Indonesia has no Commons-applicable FoP. Indonesian FOP is insufficient: for noncommercial only (failing one important test which is that files must be freely reusable even in post cards, stamps, and other commercial media without authorization from the artists and architects). As this filename was reused the third time, it's time to lock the file name for the meantime, until Indonesia removes commercial restriction for images of artistic works in their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gama Tower.jpg

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, but the Gama Tower is located in Indonesia. As architectural works are copyrighted in Indonesia until 70 years p.m.a., and the tower itself is less than 70 years old, this photograph is the derivative work of a non-free architectural work that must be deleted in line with our licensing policy and the precautionary principle. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination and previous nominations & discussions of previous photos of same building. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Gama Tower.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 22 April 2026 (UTC)