Commons:Deletion requests/2025/12/29

December 29

Trump Coin design images

At this time we do not know if these images are public domain since we do not know if the designs were done by a Mint employee or an Artistic Infusion Program artist. Coin designs from Mint artists are PD, but the rights to coin designs from AIP artists are transferred to the Mint so they are non-free. See Commons:Determining if U.S. coins are free to use, which explains the distinction in more detail. Better to be safe than sorry, I recommend we delete these images until we have info on who created them. Eman7blue42 (talk page | recent edits) 14:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep as uploader and holy crap Batman, you need to inform the uploader when you nominate things. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 14:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
    sorry! first time doing this I was getting to it. Eman7blue42 (talk page | recent edits) 14:56, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
    As for the copyright, it is likely this particular design's copyright won't ever be announced, since this was the first draft and is not one of the current drafts. However I do notice they are putting artist initials on the ones in the Artistic Infusion Program, and this design does not have an initial on it. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 15:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
    Artist initials are included when the design is sculpted. Candidate designs do not credit an artist to prevent bias among the committees that recommend coin designs, and usually the designs are a mix of AIP and Mint artists. We probably won't known if any of these designs are PD until the coin is released. Eman7blue42 (talk page | recent edits) 15:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delete At this stage, it is simply propaganda with no educational value; moreover it is not a real coin, so the artist and copyright holder may be credited later. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Mariana Rodríguez Cantú.png

There is an enormous difference between https://www.gob.mx/terminos and https://www.nl.gob.mx/es The first belongs to the federal government, the second to the free and sovereign government of the state of Nuevo León. NL's website is explicitly under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license, like most of the states in Mexico and the federal government has no jurisdiction on such licenses. Tbhotch™ 00:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Condessa Jessica Piazzi di Savoia.png

Unauthorized photo used; the author is demanding justice, please delete Claudiaprados (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 11:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Unauthorized photo used. Claudiaprados (talk) 18:49, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Count Tunin, photo was taken in London in January 2011.png

Unauthorized photo used; the author is demanding justice, please delete. Claudiaprados (talk) 00:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

 Info: ticket:2014021010009166 --Achim55 (talk) 06:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)


Unauthorized photo used; the author is demanding justice, please delete. Claudiaprados (talk) 11:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

please delete this file, there was a mistake when uploading the photo, the owner of the photo is demanding for deletion. Condado de Sealand (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

File:2024-hawaii-amendment-1.svg

There's already a file for this (File:2024 Hawaii Amendment 1 election results map by county.svg). Thomascampbell123 (talk) 00:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Sokoban deadlocks.png

No longer used in the Sokoban article, as its inclusion was considered undue weight. Carloseow (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Not being currently in use is not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Olivier Primeau Photoshoot.jpg

Doubtful public domain claim. The photograph appears to be a professional studio portrait commissioned and paid for by the subject fr:Olivier Primeau. No evidence provided that the photographer released copyright. Other files uploaded by the uploader have previously been deleted for similar copyright issues. TitCrisse (talk) 03:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Zeuszeuszeus1 (talk · contribs)

No exif, possibly not own work. Permission needed to VRT.

Jonteemil (talk) 03:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

How can I verify that this is my own work? Spizzwinks (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Follow instructions at COM:CONSENT. Jonteemil (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
At least one image can be found on Facebook.
I don't know why user Spizzwinks is asking how they can verify that Zeuszeuszeus1's uploads are their work... Nakonana (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Darko Milicic Larry Brown.png

Photo by Allen Einstein https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2211113-what-did-nba-ever-learn-from-the-darko-milcic-saga, no evidence Einstein waived the picture under CC0 PD. Copyvio and SD Hyperba21 (talk) 04:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Darko Milicic Larry Brown (cropped).png

Photo by Allen Einstein https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2211113-what-did-nba-ever-learn-from-the-darko-milcic-saga, no evidence Einstein waived the picture under CC0 PD. Copyvio and SD Hyperba21 (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Rayshard Brooks Bodycam.jpg

The Atlanta Police Department is in Georgia, a state in which records can maintain copyright. PublicDomainFan08 (talk) 05:27, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Der Plattenbau. 29.11.2019 (49819185767).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. No reason to doubt validity of PD-mark. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Zona monumental de Melide (A Coruña, Galicia) (29426173565).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  • Source is a little unclear, the exif and flickr upload says 2016, but the source cited is a 2013 YouTube video not under a free license. However the YouTube account user name matches the Flickr account name. But how does the exif magically move 3 years into the future if it's an original photo? -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 11:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep. The YouTube video isn't being claimed as the source. The source is Flickr and everything seems fine there. There just happens to be a YouTube video linked in the photo description from Flickr. I don't see a reason to doubt the validity of the PD-mark. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep Image passed flickrreview --Leoboudv (talk) 23:56, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Panourgias Eliopoulos 1787-1865.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 06:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep Alamy thinks this is PD, and they are the kings of copyright washing. Unknown author but mid 19th century is plausible. No reason to delete just because the author's name is not known on something this old. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 12:19, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Plapoutas Portrait.JPG

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 06:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep The claim this art is contemporary to the subject and therefore the unknown artist is also long dead is credible. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 12:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Pyrap.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 06:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:C1IV2svWEAE-cZQ.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:09, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Decorum herbacae (31681245257).jpg

Useless low quality image from Flickr, out of scope. Likely screenshot, not photo. Юрий Д.К. 06:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Farbraum

I propose to move most of the entries to Category:Color spaces, and then delete this category, which seems to be just a translation of 'color space.' NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:11, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Ilustraciones-Website-Web-App ReDesign Hours-1152x963px-1.webp

Screenshot of a non-free app. Presumably that depicted and described in en:Draft:TrackingTime. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:33, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Signature Vladislav Khovalyg.svg

The owner of the autograph dislikes that their signature is on public display on the internet. The owner demands the immediate removal of the signature. ~2025-43737-22 (talk) 07:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, the signature shown here is a vectorized reproduction of a signature already published on an official, publicly accessible source on the Internet. Under Russian federal law, a handwritten signature used for identification or expression of will is a technical means and is not considered a work of science, literature, or art. Therefore, it is not subject to copyright protection. Here, the signature is not used for authentication but for documentation. Best regards, Baidax 💬 06:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Lenca skull from the Comayagua Valley.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|2=No tengo los derechos de autor de esta imagen. Solicito borrado.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Uploader User:Luis Alfredo Romero (not Johnj1995, who just converted a maformed DR into speedy-request) presents on his userpage as a photographer and then states this upload is a copyvio? -- Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Same with File:Los Naranjos Honduras.jpg, which was uploaded in 2020.

File:Guangzhou (82559).jpg

Error, bad upload, wrong image. Rc1959 (talk) 08:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Afernlion (talk · contribs)

None of these are own work as claimed. Need proper sourcing to keep

Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Village Code Gondegaon.png

Screenshot of a non-free website, see copyright notice at bottom center-left. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by SAMUTHIRAKANI V (talk · contribs)

NOTWEBHOST and likely copyvio - no meaningful exif

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

These photos are not tiny, and small size and lack of meaningful EXIF are not deletion reasons per se per COM:DR. I would support the deletion of only the photos that are properly considered personal, not photos like File:NIGHT VIEW1.jpg, File:RAMP PHYLON.jpg or File:PIERS.jpg (not an exhaustive list of photos of infrastructure, rather than personnel) unless they can be shown to have been stolen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Seconding this. Some of the photos seem to be in scope. Nakonana (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Adoni Esther Gracious (talk · contribs)

NOTEWEBHOST - not seeing a reason they are notable?

Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I belive Fred Nyanzi is a notable figure in Uganda. An elder brother to Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu (Bobi Wine) and he is a long time reknown politician in Uganda who is contesting to become a Member of Parliament for the Second time in Kampala. He is also the father to the current Guild president of Makerere University (The oldest and biggest public University in Uganda). Adoni Esther Gracious (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep He seems to have been the victim of a heavily publicized abduction, too. I can't see a useful purpose in hiding photos of him. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Lubov Zavyalova (talk · contribs)

Out of scope and likely copyvios

Юрий Д.К. 10:24, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Miriamfirth (talk · contribs)

Claimed as own work but 2 are credited to bobbymedia - needs VRT

Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo), chick.jpg

The chick is to dark. I have uploaded a better version of this chick. Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 10:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Maximilian040608 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope, self-promotion

Юрий Д.К. 10:28, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Inteligência artificial - avanços e tendências.pdf

Incompatible license: page 4 lists CC-BY-NC-SA, which makes it not suitable for publication on Commons Btrs (talk) 10:28, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Btrs, thanks for your contribution! I have sent an email to the Portal de Livros Abertos da USP, and they have updated the license on the website according to the book's cataloging information. Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Apple watch hermes.jpg

Not own work, reverse image search reveals tons of results Btrs (talk) 10:32, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Lecodeurdesite.jpg

Logo previously used on deleted page on French Wikipedia fr:Lecodeurdesite, since removed for non-notability Btrs (talk) 10:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Мой БРАТАН - panoramio.jpg

Out of scope, junk Юрий Д.К. 10:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Tank28m4 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope/likely copyvios

Юрий Д.К. 10:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Feminist art in California.jpg

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Hemplasy.jpg

unused inferior precursor of File:Hemiplasy.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Hermann von Ebersberg.2020 171702.jpg

duplicate of File:HermannVonEbersberg.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:MonteKristoKont.jpg

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Gohil sir - Book.jpg

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Sally et Denis Mukwege.jpg

copyvio|source=https://www.instagram.com/reel/CgSKbLUo8pk/ An insect photographer (talk) 11:16, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  • Uploader name is Sallyofficiel and this and other uploads appear to be original and authentic. Still missing confirmed permissions, but doesn't scream "copyvio" to me. Also the still in the video you linked to has a caption, which is not present in the photo uploaded here, which means the upload here had access to the original and is not from this video. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 12:10, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
    You are right it's not a copyvio from the video I have mentioned. I have seen the others pictures from this user, especially the one on French Wikipédia where Sally is smiling at White House. Almost the same picture exists on her Instagram but without smiling. And it have been uploaded before the beginning of GenAI for images. So it looks like Sallyofficiel uploaded original pictures. An insect photographer (talk) 08:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kavehm0.jpg

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:They Left us Flags, not food - by GELA MIKAVA.png

Likely copyvio, used at en:Draft:გელა მიქავა, which is about a professional artist. Likely out of scope as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Figurative Abstract art by Gela Mikava.jpg

Uploaded by same user as en:Draft:გელა მიქავა, which is about a professional artist. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:EPoint.jpg

The source of the video is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-op4Gea6pm8 and indeed has a CC-BY-SA license. However, there are a couple of problems. The Youtube channel has only one subscribed and this is the only video there. The owner of the channel is not the film maker, but the curator of the exhibition and in fact is interviewd in the video, see video at 1:46. The video was also published a couple of days later, without a permissive license, in the channel https://www.youtube.com/@NewRealizm/videos that host several videos about the StarkArt exhibitions, but it is also difficult to judge if it is an official channel. The actual film marker is Martin Arpagaus, se video at 3:36. To keep this file we need an VRT ticket from the actual copyright owner. Günther Frager (talk) 11:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:T-64 BM capturado por las Fuerzas Armadas Rusas.jpg

Copyvio; obviously not own work. BilletsMauves (talk) 12:02, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:1147972480 0 120 1280 840 1920x0 80 0 0 dc76f9867098b212f609a484744ca0b7.jpg

Copyvio; obviously not own work (see https://www.larepubliquedespyrenees.fr/societe/afp/au-moins-28-morts-dans-un-bombardement-dans-l-est-de-l-ukraine-occupe-selon-moscou-18430742.php for example). BilletsMauves (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Street art in Paris

{{NoFoP-France}}

 Keep - de minimis --Mbzt (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis--Mbzt (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis--Mbzt (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée --Mbzt (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée - --Mbzt (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ---Mbzt (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ---Mbzt (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ---Mbzt (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ---Mbzt (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ---Mbzt (talk) 16:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - motif de suppression incompréhensible --Mbzt (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ----Mbzt (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - motif de suppression incompréhensible ---Mbzt (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée ----Mbzt (talk) 16:13, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - motif de suppression incompréhensible ----Mbzt (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, About my File:Place Concorde en février 2014 07.jpg, the object shown is just a simple diamond shape. It is not sufficiently original to qualify as protectable by french copyright (droit d'auteur) as the work must "reflects the personality of its author". A very common diamond shape is not original enough for that. Regards. Lionel Allorge (talk) 23:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I don't see why my File:Pieuvre GZ'UP.png would have to be deleted. Could someone explain? I'm no law expert, but I hardly see how it can violate copyrights, as I'm the author of the photography, and as its pictured objet is freely accessible to anyone going to Paris. How could a publicly and permanently visible item be forbidden to photography? Isn't it automatically a part of the public domain, since its author left it in the outside, without even putting it there legally (some people would say it's a kind of vandalism), and since anyone can modify it without any consequence? If I just droped a piece of paper on the road, wouldn't its original content be free of copyright in the exact same way? And what about a public sculpture or building? It has an author, sure (the sculptor or the architect), but since it's permanently visible to anyone and on a public space, it seems to me that it must be free of copyright, at least for photography. --Grelot-de-Bois (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

No Freedom of panorama in France, so the copyright on the octopus applies and you thus cannot publish your photograph under a Free licence. Rama (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, don't understand why the image File:Revendication.jpg would to be deleted. Please check your understanding of french copyright laws. Available to help if needed. --Eric Walter (talk) 07:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Eric Walter, my understanding is that there is no freedon of panorama in France, except when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Rodrigolopes and thanks for answering. So you consider the street paint as a protected work ? Because freedom of panorama is only for protected work outside. --Eric Walter (talk) 08:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Please keep File:StreetArt Paris RueHautefeuille.jpeg

Hi Rodrigolopes and thank you for the time you spend improving WP. About the File:StreetArt Paris RueHautefeuille.jpeg, I met the author of the drawing withing the no entry sign. The author told me he wants his street-art drawings be photographed and published on websites. But he wants to stay anonymous.
Oops, I have just read https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Panorama_in_Europe_in_2015. I hope it is not too late... I will contact some Members of European Parliament and request help in free software forums... If we all convince the European Parliament, Freedom of panorama will be OK in Europe :-) Cheers --Oliver H (talk) 07:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Oliver H: , I forgot this discussion, but I think the result will be  Keep. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Paris and COM:GRAFFITI. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 Keep new versions

--Paris 16 (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Those are often not really much better than the previous versions. Simply blurring something is not enough to void copyright. It must be sufficiently different to not be a derivative work. Stuff like File:Rue de la Lune, Paris 25 June 2015.jpg is not sufficiently different. So the decision is still the same: Either we assume that these are not copyrighted or the author will not assert their copyright then these can stay in their unblurred form. If we assume that these are copyrighted then the blurred version is still a derivative work and we need the author's permission. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I opened that discussion and think that can be closed by  Keep. See the similar DR Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Paris and COM:GRAFFITI. Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Kept: DR withrawn by nominator. JuTa 00:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Files in Category:Street art in Paris

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in France. Notice that they being graffiti is not a excuse to keep them, see COM:GRAFFITI.

 Keep - de minimis --Mbzt (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis--Mbzt (talk) 16:28, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis --Mbzt (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep : scène de rue --Mbzt (talk) 20:55, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis
 Keep : image floutée --Mbzt (talk) 20:55, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Yes, blurred and therefore probably OK. The images you claim are de minimis above are not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep - image floutée --Mbzt (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Keep this one as blurred, yes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep - De minimis --Mbzt (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis--Mbzt (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Probably not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep - de minimis ; le château d'eau est pris avec le moins de peinture possible --Mbzt (talk) 16:28, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
  •  Delete But this is way too much of the painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep - demande de suppression incompréhensible ---Mbzt (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
What is incomprehensible about it? It looks like a sound deletion request. Do you think the graffiti is below COM:TOO France? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
 Keep, image depicts the whole building, and the presence of the graffiti is unavoidable per COM:DM France. Tvpuppy (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
The photo was taken with the sole purpose of illustrating the artwork not the building, just read the filename and description, i.e., the artwork is no accessory. Also, the tower was built in the 1950s, see en:Tower 13, so it still likely protected as an architectural work in France (70 years pma). Günther Frager (talk) 11:47, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
 Keep De minimis - --Mbzt (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
 Delete I disagree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Günther Frager (talk) 12:51, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by ADBGVA (talk · contribs)

The uploader might have taken these photos, but it is not clear if he is Ludo the creator of the artworks. Notice that many of these images were taken on Paris and France has no freedom of panorama.

Günther Frager (talk) 12:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Rev Dr Jane Shaw (3416654770) (cropped).jpg

this photo contains my image without permission. Please delete this photo. Please choose a different photo of Rev Shaw without me in it MasakiShimano (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Proxima Flute (By C34).png

Random image uploaded when author was younger. Proximaprotogen (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  • Random as in you didn't create it, or random as in you don't think it's useful? I found some similar postings from Reddit by this user https://www.reddit.com/user/Finn-The-Wizard/ who goes by C34. So probably not own work. Looks like uploader nominated it for deletion in response to a talk page enquiry at Wikipedia. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Biotti

This gallery page was created by the long-term cross-wiki spammer Alec Smithson, is embellished with falsehoods, and many images have been deleted from it. Much like the spurious connection between the unrelated Natoli and Nanteuil families, the alleged connections between the Italian Biotti family and people and places named Biot in France are likely made up. Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

If only we had w:WP:G3 (speedy deletion as hoax) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (Wikipedia talk · Global contributions · he/him) 13:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Konzervatoř Brno (talk · contribs)

COM:NETC No proof of CC license, no proof of “unknown” author.

Gumruch (talk) 13:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Robot from the cartoon Nehochukha Unwantie 2025.jpg

Character from 1986 cartoon. It hasn't entered the public domain. DurbeK82 (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Monumentul părinților fondatori ai Uniunii Europene

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Romania.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Pandyan kingdom.jpg

Erros and wrong. Not accurate. JamesMdp (talk) 14:14, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per nom. unused, 20 years old, low quality, unsourced. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Monument to Nicholas Yakovchenko, Kyiv

The monument was completed in 2000 by Volodymyr Chepelyk (1945–2021). There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2092

A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:AMAM.JPG and File:AMAN.png

Bad JPG version of File:Brasão Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras.png. The PNG version is also of low quality compared to the new file I uploaded. heylenny (talk/edits) 14:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

(I could have simply overwritten the existing PNG version at File:AMAN.png, but I only noticed this after opening the deletion request. Anyway, it can simply be redirected to the new upload.) heylenny (talk/edits) 15:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Batignolles rue Legendre Justice pour Nahel juin 2023.jpg

Dans la partie de droite de l’image, les visages des personnes n’ont pas été floutés alors qu’elles sont sans rapport avec le sujet (partie gauche). Il en est de même des plaques d’immatriculation des véhicules (et des autres renseignements permettant l’identification). Jerome misc (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Automatic translation in EN : In the right part of the image, the faces of the people have not been blurred, even though they are unrelated to the subject (left part). The same is true for the vehicle registration plates (and other information allowing identification). --Jerome misc (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Batignolles rue Legendre Justice pour Nahel juin 2023.jpg

Pas de liberté de panorama en France (No FoP in France) et "Les graffitis illégaux sont également protégés par la loi française sur le droit d'auteur." Jerome misc (talk) 14:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep. Graffiti is far too simple for copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
    I'd like to think so, but some of what's on COM:TOO France troubles me: 'For an art exhibition, a man placed the word paradis with gold lettering above the bathroom door of the old dormitory of alcoholics at a psychiatric facility, and termed it artwork; the French courts agreed with him that it was copyrightable based on the aesthetic choices made ("affixing the word 'paradise' in gold with patina effect and a special graphics on dilapidated door, the lock-shaped cross, encased in a crumbling wall with peeling paint").' That does sound more involved than this, though. So likely  Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:(Ucronia)_Libero_consorzio_dell'Oltresalso_o_Val_di_Noto_Occidentale.svg

imho out of scope, unexisting (but supposedly/probably self made) coat of arms, unrelevant. risks creating/causing confusion GioviPen GP msg 15:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@GiovanniPen non sono d’accordo con il motivo della cancellazione. È ben specificato nel nome del file che lo stemma è inventato ed è posto ad utilizzo esclusivo nella voce del suo disegnatore. Se ci pensi, è quasi ciò che hanno fatto altri colleghi disegnandosi stemmi che non esistono… Jilligate (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
sì capisco quello che dici @Jilligate, ne parlavo in user talk con l'utente. però idk GioviPen GP msg 14:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

File:COAPirane.jpg

Most likely an unintentional unverified upload, since some borders have been forgoten and the user uploaded a superseding version 8 min. later instead of overwriting the first.
Kontributor 2K (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Landsberger Poesieautomat

copyright violation, no permission for the shown artworks/texts, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2025 (UTC)


@Martin Sg.: Ich widerspreche diesem Löschantrag. Für "mein" Foto (Landsberger Poesieautomat 20181111 1235.jpg) habe ich damals extra vorort nachgefragt, ob fotografiert werden darf. Ergänzend zur entsprechenden Zustimmung gab man mir die Erklärung, der Automat mache ja nur Sinn, wenn Besucher "ihren" Text per Knopfdruck erzeugen würden. Selbstverständlich könne man dann "seinen" Text auch abfotografieren. (Der Knopf ist in beinen Fotos vorne rechts zu sehen.)
Zudem ist/war diese Installation nicht Teil der eigentlichen Museumsausstellung, sondern befindet/befand sich besuchergerecht im Foyer.
Bitte daher von einer Löschung der beiden o.g. Fotos absehen.
Danke u. Grüße, --rolf_acker (Diskussion) 16:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Ich kann Rolf Acker nur zustimmen. Ich war Praktikant im Museum, als ich mein Foto gemacht habe, im Auftrag des Museums. Jetzt können wir drüber diskutieren, ob das nicht im Ermessen der Würth Stiftung als Eigentümerin des Werkes liegen müsste. Wenn du willst, schreibe ich denen eine Mail und frage nach, ob ein Foto davon in ihrem Sinne ist. Jahfaby (talk) 15:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Primate social organization.jpg

duplicate redundant image Bioanthropologist1 (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Ancient Egyptian Garden, Hamilton Gardens

No freedom of panorama for 2d works in New Zealand. The Egyptian Garden was opened to the public in 2022 and recently created so the graphics would still be copyright. There are other images in the category containing the mural but COM:DEMINIMIS should apply to them, although I recommend someone more experienced than myself judge that.

Traumnovelle (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Ma Zhancang.png

Original source and author not listed and unclear. Given source is a blog; the image is not a photograph but a drawing, which may have been made recently and cannot be assumed to be made before the subject's death and under a free license. Yue🌙 (talk) 19:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Files in Category:Murals in New Zealand

No freedom of panorama in New Zealand. I am not 100% sure about the lighthouse mural because it combines a 3d work and a 2d work to create piece of art.

Traumnovelle (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm agreeable with my image (File:Palmy is Great.JPG) being deleted. I was unaware of the subtleties around FoP when I posted it over a decade ago. Kiwi128 (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:بيان2.png

I tagged it for speedy deletion with COM:CSD#F7 since there isn't a thumbnail generated but Johnj1995 removed it since the file Does not appear to be corrupt according to them. Apart from the thumbnail issues there is also a copyright issue. If not F7 is valid then I suggest that ownership should be proven to VRT. Jonteemil (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Moscow, 1992. leaflet Labor Russia.jpg

This document does not fall under "PD-RU-exempt" because it: 1) is not an official document of state or local government agencies, as the "Labor Russia" movement was a public, not a governmental organization; 2) is not a state symbol or sign nor symbol or sign of a municipal formation; 3) is not a work of folk art as it has specific authors; 4) is not a news reports of events and facts of a purely informational character, as it contains developed value judgments, a call to action, and instructions for participants. Yellow Horror (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

  •  Delete per nom, not a state document. --Komarof (talk) 11:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)