Commons:Deletion requests/2026/01/26

January 26

File:Gmail - Cité pétrole.pdf

Données personnelles visibles sur le document ~2026-54832-7 (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

{ {vd} } out of scope, unless m:Special:CentralAuth/Poloroc @User:Poloroc fr:Utilisateur:Poloroc/Brouillon gives a strong reason for having this file. Personal communication, malware site, privacy issues, possibly copyrighted third-party content. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Hey this was an exchange with a local official source and I forgot to clean email adresses and full names. Will be reuploaded without personal informations Poloroc (talk) 22:13, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
@User:Poloroc What is the file (on your user page) needed for?  Speedy delete consent of the uploader is given. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
I don't think it is a relevant file and can't remember why I uploaded it in thé first place, might actually be a mistake. Poloroc (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Let's get it deleted without replacement then. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:São Gonçalo do Rio Abaixo (1).png

Gostaria de apagar ele pois pode ter direitos autorais Kairos Rabelo (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:SGRA Brasão.png

Gostaria de apagar ele pois pode ter direitos autorais Kairos Rabelo (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

  • Translation: "I would like to delete it because it might be copyrighted." -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 02:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
    Check Brazilian law first. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Joint Regional Transport Officer Rank Insignia (Kerala).png

Better version uploaded Asifalinair (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:La Rosilla, frente frio 30 - 12 de enero de 2020.jpg

This photo wasn't taken in january 12, 2020. ಠ ಠ 05:28, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep What's the problem? Just edit the date. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
There's no known date ಠ ಠ 03:41, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
That wouldn't be a problem either. One could write "unknown" in the date field. But I can't find any evidence for a CC license on the source page so I suspect a copyvio.  Delete -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 07:48, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Please delete. ಠ ಠ 09:12, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by ชวลิต ประกอบสุข (talk · contribs)

Highly unlikely that these are own works. Most of these have no metadata and some are obviously photos of photos. The ones that do have metadata have four different cameras. COM:PCP

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Thomas-KI.jpg

Out of scope low quality AI image The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep. File is admittedly low quality, but that does not mean it's out of scope. The image was uploaded to illustrate a specific motif in the history of theology (the reception of St. Thomas as the “terminator” of theology in modern American neo-Thomism). It was in use when it was uploaded and is in use now.--Jordi (talk) 08:59, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep for now per COM:INUSE. However, the file is of low-quality and doesn't seem very relevant+useful at the place where it's used. There, it has the caption The modern turn to Thomas Aquinas as the “terminator” (completer) of theology in the American Catholicism of 21. Century, illustrated by an AI image generator based on ideas by Thomas Marschler and Anian Christoph Wimmer. I think one should ask about it at the talk page there and if the file gets removed one could delete it from Commons – however, I see no genuine need to delete this one small file but wouldn't oppose deletion at that point. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
I deliberately uploaded this file to illustrate exactly what is explained in the caption and what the image represents: A representation of Aquinas as the "terminator" of theology by American right-wing Catholics, using AI. This is a legitimate scope and Commons has not to interfere with the contents of another project.--Jordi (talk) 09:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
 Delete I don’t see how this image, which is taken from an article about Thomas’s possible views on AI, has anything to do with some pun about the terminator that in itself seems extremely unencyclopedic. Dronebogus (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
 Delete the only place where the image is currently used is an article on dewiki, however, the usage of this AI-generated image on dewiki goes against dewiki policy on AI-generated images. The relevant policy can be found at w:de:Wikipedia:Künstliche Intelligenz and states that AI-generated images are only to be used to illustrate Ai topics, or, in rare cases, after forming consensus to use a particular AI-generated image in a particular article (but no such discussion can be found on the talk page of the dewiki article in question). Relevant quote from the policy: Sparsamer Einsatz von KI-generierten Bildern, insbesondere als Beispiele in Artikeln zu diesem Thema und zu einzelnen Bildgeneratoren wie Midjourney oder Stable Diffusion. Außerhalb des Themenbereichs Künstliche Intelligenz dürfen KI-generierte Bilder im Artikelnamensraum nur in Ausnahmefällen, nach Diskussion und Konsens für jedes einzelne Bild, verwendet werden. Nakonana (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
The dewiki article in question: w:de:Thomismus. Nakonana (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
That's not true, the usage of this AI-generated image on dewiki does explicitely not go against dewiki policy on AI-generated images, because I put it there delibertely as an example of AI-powered (mis-)conception of Thomism by the American TradCath movement. Das Bild gehört genau dahin, weil es ein mittels KI generiertes Missverständnis bzw. Pseudoverständnis illustriert, wie in der Bildlegende erläutert. Das ist vollkommen legitim und umfasst selbstverständlich den "Themenbereichs Künstliche Intelligenz". Außerdem darf sich Commons nicht in andere Projekte einmischen, das Bild wird dort verwendet, ist also "in use", Punkt. Mehr braucht auf Commons nicht diskutiert zu werden. Warum und weshalb es benutzt wird oder ob das zulässig ist, ist eine Frage, die nur deWP etwas angeht.--Jordi (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Language Day 2011 (5728496732).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:30, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:پیکرهای بیشتری از معترضان.png

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:31, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Shizao is not a good reason to delete the file.
Doostdar (talk) 07:53, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This file is important. 0PAWN0 (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Whose permission is being asked for? The reverse image search results I'm getting are all dated after the upload to Commons. I'm not seeing any indication that the image was available anywhere else before being uploaded to Commons. Nakonana (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:May-menassa.jpg

Heavily in use, or I'd just speedy this, but appears to be a recreation (by the same uploader) of File:May Menassa.jpg, which was deleted for lack of permission. Jmabel ! talk 06:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Maraschi bust.jpg

This 1985 bust is a work of Harriet G. Moore (1920–2018). Freedom of panorama in the United States is limited to buildings only. This sculpture is subject to copyright until 2089. ✗plicit 06:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:CAMM operators versionFR.png

Outdated and PNG version of File:CAMM operators.svg Borvan53 (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tuulist (talk · contribs)

book covers. Unlike that own work or has permission from the artist

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Tuulist (talk · contribs)

problematic user. Some are old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. In many cases written permission from Kulle Raig is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Lucia Jude (talk · contribs)

These are DW's of something but claimed as own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Slava Zverev (talk · contribs)

Spam. Promo of a politician or an activist. Not in use now guess why.

Bilderling (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep File:В.В Соколов с Берталаном Фаркашем.jpg because (aside from the non-notable Viktor Sokolov) it depicts Bertalan Farkas. Nakonana (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:خريطة عثمانية لشبه الجزيرة العربية.jpg

1- Unknown name and description 2- the source is not accessible to verify ~2026-55551-4 (talk) 10:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

1. اسم الخارطة: Doğu Asya, Doğu Nejd ve Körfez’in bir kısmı. İran sınırları ve kumlu çöl görünmektedir
2. رمز المصدر: HRT.0460 ضمن أرشيف الدولة العثمانية (BOA) Dhafairi (talk) 10:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Computation.png

inferior version of File:Maquina.png - not "own work" Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Šiluvos Švč. Mergelės Marijos Gimimo bazilika.jpg

Author's request Ulbaidas (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

  •  Keep You are beyond the 1-week automatic courtesy deletion period and the photo is COM:INUSE in a Wikipedia article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Šiluvos Švč. Mergelės Marijos Gimimo bazilika.jpg

uploader request Ulbaidas (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Ulbaidas you will need to provide a different reason to have this file deleted because too much time has passed for a deletion on uploader's request. As far as I can tell there are also no freedom of panorama issues, because, according to the dewiki article on the church, the interiors of the church have not been changed in the last 200 years, any copyright on the interiors has thus expired. Nakonana (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Vilniaus šv. Pranciškaus Asyžiečio bažnyčia.jpg

uploader request Ulbaidas (talk) 10:57, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Introduction to male nudity.jpg

I don't want to provide this picture anymore Xiongeeee (talk) 11:16, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by LejunOSM (talk · contribs)

Source - Antonin Del Fabbro- all need VRT

Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Uh, not sure of the meaning of "VRT" here. Could you elaborate on the reason to request the deletion of these files? LejunOSM (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Valid permission from the photographer, per above named ticket. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep per VRT member Mussklprozz. Nakonana (talk) 18:23, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:1982 Colorado state bird and flower 20-cent stamp.jpg

Copyrighted by the U.S. Postal Service per COM:United States and uplodaded without permission. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment. There is no notice. This should be checked to see if it was registered within 5 years. If not, it would be in the public domain per {{PD-US-1978-89}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:刘金国照片.jpg

It's an official portrait. Not a work of CNS. http://lianghui.people.com.cn/2023/n1/2023/0312/c452482-32642214.html Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Ball3.jpg

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 11:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Potentially useful sign, but it might be under copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:6207 te Almere Parkwijk.jpg

Ik upload hem elders/ OVSpotterKevin (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete on uploader's request on the day of upload. Nakonana (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:肖天亮照片.jpg

It's from CCTV's Xinwen Lianbo. see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:张升民照片.jpg Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:INSV Kaundinya based on Ajanta Cave Drawing.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shaan Sengupta as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From Modi's personal X handle. If any confusion plz refer to this DR.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the image/painting looks to be old. Couldn't it be in the PD already? -- Túrelio (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Túrelio, I actually went with the flow bcoz of multiple images using the same source. Thanks for the DR. This is a mural painting in centuries old Ajanta Caves. Its obvious that this is PD. Maybe we can continue using {{GODL-India}} for the image and add {{PD-Art}} for the painting. Shaan SenguptaTalk 12:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:王仁华照片.jpg

It's from CCTV's Xinwen Lianbo. see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:张升民照片.jpg Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:原中央军委委员苗华照片.jpg

It's from CCTV's Xinwen Lianbo. see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:张升民照片.jpg Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:李书磊照片.jpg

It's from CCTV's Xinwen Lianbo. see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:张升民照片.jpg Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Assyrian resistance leader of the Defense of Iwardo, Gallo Shabo.webp

Gallo Shabo was born 1876 and passed away 1966 in Aynwardo. He was not 40 years old in this photograph, it was taken during the later years of his life. Reason the date says 1915 must be because it was just entered as the year he was active during Sayfo (the Aramean genocide). On top of that, there is no source mentioning it was taken 1915. Wlaak (talk) 12:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:SEG-7707.jpg

Copyrighted content. Mark (talk) 12:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean by "copyrighted content"? You've uploaded the image yourself several years ago, claiming it as an own work. Are you saying that you did not take the picture yourself?
The depicted structure (fountain?) is covered by the Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Israel (COM:FOP Israel), so there's no copyright issue on that end. Nakonana (talk) 18:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SEG 5604 DxO.jpg

Copyrighted content Mark (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean by "copyrighted content"? You've uploaded the image yourself several years ago, claiming it as an own work. Are you saying that you did not take the picture yourself? The EXIF data indicates that you are the author, if I'm reading that right.
The depicted building is covered by the Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Israel (COM:FOP Israel), so there's no copyright issue on that end. Nakonana (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:SEG 5602 DxO.jpg

Copyrighted content Mark (talk) 12:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean by "copyrighted content"? You've uploaded the image yourself several years ago, claiming it as an own work. Are you saying that you did not take the picture yourself? The EXIF data indicates that you are the author, if I'm reading that right.
The depicted building is covered by the Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Israel (COM:FOP Israel), so there's no copyright issue on that end. Nakonana (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Statue with a longhorn symbol.jpg

This statue in Austin, Texas was erected for the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the University of Texas Longhorn Band - which was in 1900, so the statue went up in 2000. The USA has no freedom of panorama for three-dimensional works, and even if the sculptor died the day the statue was unveiled, it would still be under copyright until 2071 at the earliest. DS (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to absurdity of the Wonderland behind the mirror/the ocean

You say: The USA has no freedom of panorama for three-dimensional works.

I noticed that every building is a three-dimensional work of architecture, isn't it? So how am I allowed to picture any building? The author's right will make him forgotten as none of his works is allowed to be depicted.

Human rights make me angry, because I want this statute to be known, help the sculptor to be known, to say I was happy when was passing these paths of Texas University. And you tell me: You are human/author right offender for trying to harm the sculptor...

It would be at least useful to ask the author of the sculpture...

Sincerely

Xerostomus (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

I understand why this feels absurd and frustrating. I've often felt this way about public art that I can photograph but can't upload.
In US law, buildings are treated differently from sculptures: photographs of buildings are explicitly allowed, but most sculptures are still protected by copyright. Wikimedia Commons has to follow those rules even when they don't make much sense. See COM:FOP for all the messy details worldwide.
This isn't about human rights or accusing anyone of wrongdoing. It's just about what Commons is legally allowed to host. You are, of course, free to take photos for personal use or on sites with different rules.
If you can contact the sculptor and get permission, that’s often the best solution. Please see COM:VRTS for details about appropriate forms.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:The Molotov Plan versus the Marshall Plan.webp

In copyright at source — Racconish 💬 14:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Andros1985 (talk · contribs)

Promo of an actor. Was. Not in use now - suprprise!

Bilderling (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy delete all but the last two images as COPYVIOs (screenshots of recent newspaper articles etc.).
 Neutral regarding the last two images. I don't know whether the depicted event and actor are notable. The actor does not seem to have a wiki article, but there are also too many people with the same name to quickly determine with a brief Google search whether he's notable or not. The image could be kept as a stock photo type of image, if he turns out to be not notable. Nakonana (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Picasso Mural and Iggy Pop Billboard at Plaça Nova (Barcelona) (94848429).jpg

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

FoP: Permanent vs temporary: Whether a work is installed at a public place permanently or not is not a question of absolute time, but a question of what the intention was when the work was placed there. If it was put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work, then it is "permanent".
So, if we assume its natural lifespan is "as long the campaign is running", then it should be a  Keep--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 22:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Arie de winter.jpg

VRT ticket does not contain permission from copyright holder. Way too recent for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Unlikely to be anonymous work, given the nature of the picture. Even so recent that the URAA monster applies, which makes it unfree in the US even for that reason. So there is no way that we could be in the clear for this file. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Elevado de Los Alcarrizos y el Metro de Los Alcarrizos desde un dron.jpg

This photo does not have the correct license. Markocortesa2 (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you correct the license, or is that beside the point? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:AP Sensing Logo.jpg

The company logo is outdated Bernie FOS (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

  •  Keep As part of the history of a company with a Wikipedia article about it. You may request COM:File renaming, if you like. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

File:New Logo of SLIIT.png

This logo uploaded by a third party without evidence of permission. Uploader is not the copyright holder. Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license is incorrect for a copyrighted logo. File is low quality and unsuitable for encyclopedic use. Brayan.87622 (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Elia Weiss.png

possible copyvio - https://www.f4championship.com/DRIVER/24/WEISS%20ELIA%20LUIS - would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

copyvio, photographer is named in EXIF-informations, copyrights are hold by AG PHOTO darkking3 Թ 07:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Eduwiki Workshop February 2026.png

The file contains some errors Muze'n (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Muze'n, why don't you fix the errors and simply upload a corrected file using the "Upload a new version of this file" link on the page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by therondp (talk · contribs)

According to the user was editing on behalf of ACG as an employee, I suspecte that these images were just taken from the website of the organisation as the non-aerial shots look promotional in nature. If therondp was working for ACG when uploading these images we can presume that the images are property of ACG and thus VRT permission is required.

Traumnovelle (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:The passion is gone.png

Is this really in COM:SCOPE? LevandeMänniska (talk), 20:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep – I am the artist, Ora Ruven, and I created this work. The VRT/OTRS permission for this file has already been confirmed, verifying my identity and the free license. This image is not a random upload; it is a professional work of art that is part of my documented portfolio, as seen in Category:Ora Ruven. You can find more information about my artistic career, exhibitions, and background on my official website: www.oraruven-art.com.
The question was raised whether this file is within COM:SCOPE. Documenting the works of contemporary artists for educational and cultural purposes is a central mission of Wikimedia Commons. As this file represents a legitimate work of art from a recognized artist, it clearly has the necessary educational value to remain in the repository,. SharonyOr (talk) 08:39, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
SharonyOr (talk) 08:10, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Can you please remove the Deletion requests? it is from 26 January. Thanks SharonyOr (talk) 04:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Alojzy Wojtowicz.pdf

Nieznany status praw autorskich grafiki widocznej na zdjęciu. Alojzy Wojtowicz zmarł w 1992 r. więc nie można mu zrobić zdjęcia w 2022. Geralt Riv (*talk) 20:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Zdjęcie zostało źle podpisane i wrzucone na wikipedię w 2022 roku. Data może być poprawiona. Kamil Wojt (talk) 20:38, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Zdjęcie jest z książki. Kto jest autorem zdjęcia? Geralt Riv (*talk) 20:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Ja jestem. Kamil Wojt (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
i zdjęcie jest z archiwum rodzinnego Kamil Wojt (talk) 23:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Panie Kamilu, to sytuacja analogiczna do wykonania zdjęcia „Mony Lisy” i podpisania się jako autor obrazu. Przepraszam za dosłowność tego porównania, ale pozwala ono dobrze zobrazować problem.
Aby dodać plik do Wikimedia Commons, należy być autorem danego dzieła albo posiadać autorskie prawa majątkowe do niego — samo wykonanie fotografii cudzego dzieła nie jest wystarczające. Wynika to z faktu, że dodając plik do Commons, udostępnia się go na jednej z wolnych licencji, umożliwiających jego dalsze wykorzystywanie przez osoby trzecie.
W sytuacji, gdy autor dzieła jest nieznany, nie ma możliwości swobodnego dysponowania jego prawami autorskimi. Warto zapoznać się z materiałem Pierwsze kroki na Commons, a w szczególności uwzględnić zawartą tam grafikę – Drzewo decyzyjne dla przesyłania plików na Commons. Polecam również zapoznać się z jak uzyskać pozwolenie na dodanie pliku.
Proszę też nie odbierać tej uwagi jako ataku osobistego, jak już Pan sugerował — po prostu sprawdzam zgodność dodanych przez Pana informacji na Wikipedii oraz plików w Wikimedia Commons z obowiązującymi zasadami, tak aby zapewnić możliwie najwyższą jakość i poprawność treści encyklopedycznych. Geralt Riv (*talk) 10:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Alojzy Wojtowicz z żoną.jpg

Nieznany status praw autorskich grafiki widocznej na zdjęciu. Zdjęcie nie jest z 2022 r. Geralt Riv (*talk) 20:31, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Autor zdjęcia nieznany, a zdjęcie było upublicznione ponad 70 temu nie widzę więc problemu żeby była na wikipedii skoro nie ma już praw autorskich Kamil Wojt (talk) 20:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Gdzie było upublicznione? Geralt Riv (*talk) 20:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Wśród rodziny. Kamil Wojt (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep Correct date is in title. PD in Poland and USA. Translate: "The copyright status of the image shown in the photo is unknown. The photo is not from 2022." --RAN (talk) 02:24, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
    The use of this template PD-Poland requires providing information about where and when the image was first published. Without indicating the place and date of first publication, the template should not be applied. Geralt Riv (*talk) 06:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:National anthem of Kyrgyzstan (1992–2012) Recording.ogg

The file contains just general {{PD-KG-exempt}} license, but it does not seem that the conditions of Commons:Audio#A note about copyright were met. Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Applies also to File:National Anthem of Bophuthatswana (1977-1994) BOP TV official recording.ogg. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:13, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
One more note: There is also no license tag giving any information why it should be in the PD in the United States and I believe it is copyrighted in the United States because of the reasons given above (for example it violates recording rights and the rights of interpreters). So, because no evidence that the file does not violate copyright has been given since the nomination several months ago, I suggest deleting it soon. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Scan 050 TQ 1.png

Duplikat von SNCF Class 050 TQ.jpg Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Russian Liberation People's Army.svg

This is not the real flag and this is some false information. In the source, it states clearly it was not the official flag at all and was a fake. Discussions on the Axis History Forum confirm a real flag and not this one. This should be deleted as this is false information and used for years to deceive people. https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=291453&p=2612783#p2612783 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-56713-2 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictional flags of historical entities (to be replaced and deleted). In use on 10+ wikis.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:16, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep as said by @Jeff G., this flag is used on several wikis... I don't understand this action to propose the deletion... Groumphy (talk) 05:55, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
 Keep as per written evidence of being the Flag of the Lokot Autonomy described by its founder Konstantin Voskoboinik and was used for the party as well as for Lokot: "a white cloth with the image of St. George the Victorious and the St. George's Cross in the upper left corner of the banner". The Russian Wiki article links the source for that. The flag is therefore not fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Empire1799 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
@Empire1799: That was a bad link.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:04, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Dubai, dubai mall e burj khalifa 04.jpg

Other images excessively focused on the Burj Khalifa and other buildings were deleted due to the freedom of panorama being only for broadcasts in the UAE. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 23:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Indeed, must be  Deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2026 (UTC)