File:Northern Pintail (m) (55001952089).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2026 at 17:45:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Northern Pintail (m) (55001952089).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Northern Pintail (m) (55001952089).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
•  Info Northern Pintail, Contra Costa County, California. 840 mm shot. Сreated by Becky Matsubara – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 17:45, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 17:45, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Comment It's a nice pose but a this bird is common and the resolution/size too small (lacking detail) Poco a poco (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

  Hello, Diego. Yes, not the best resolution but the bird is still beautiful and the pose unusual. Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support — Chat-qui-Aboie (talk) 23:54, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --Lmbuga (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:20, 10 April 2026 (UTC) 
•  Weak oppose I've been going back and forth on this for a few days. The pose is genuinely striking and gives the image a strong visual appeal, but in the end the technical quality doesn't quite convince me. As noted above, the level of detail and resolution falls short of the very high standards typically expected for bird FPs. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:38, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Radomianin --Tagooty (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --heylenny (^talk/_edits) 00:29, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Oppose Exactly same feeling as Radomianim. but I am sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Oppose Appealing at first glance, but only 2,830 × 2,122 pixels and low level of detail with this low resolution, unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Oppose Resolution is too low, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Yes, I now agree that level of details is too low. Radomianin explained correctly. Юрий Д.К. 17:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)