User talk:Manabimasu
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:14, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Request to Correct Map Misrepresenting Internationally Recognized Borders
Hello, I recently came across a map that inaccurately represents certain territories as part of Russia, contradicting internationally recognized borders. I urge you to correct this issue, as it is not merely a cartographic inaccuracy but a serious matter with broader implications. Why This Is Important Violation of International Law The United Nations, along with the vast majority of countries, does not recognize Russia’s claims over certain territories, including parts of Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. Depicting them as Russian territory legitimizes an illegal annexation and occupation, violating the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity enshrined in international law. Promotion of Russian Propaganda The misrepresentation of borders aligns directly with Russian disinformation campaigns, which aim to create confusion, normalize aggression, and undermine the global rules-based order. This is a well-documented strategy used by the Kremlin to justify its invasions and territorial claims. Russian propaganda operates through several key tactics: Disinformation – Spreading falsehoods to reshape public perception. Whataboutism – Deflecting criticism by pointing to unrelated issues. Fake Legitimacy – Using seemingly neutral platforms to spread state-controlled narratives. Repetition & Saturation – Bombarding media with the same false claims until they gain traction. Astroturfing & Bots – Using fake accounts to fabricate a sense of public support for propaganda. De Facto Recognition of Aggression By displaying a map that aligns with Russian territorial claims, even if presented under the guise of “de facto control,” you are unintentionally supporting and spreading these narratives. Maps are not just illustrations—they shape perceptions, influence public opinion, and impact policymaking. Presenting occupied regions as Russian territory directly aids Moscow’s efforts to normalize illegal annexations. Undermining Wikipedia’s Credibility Wikipedia is built on principles of neutrality, reliability, and verifiability. Allowing maps that reflect the perspective of an aggressor state rather than established international law compromises the platform’s integrity. The vast majority of Wikipedia maps adhere to internationally recognized borders, and this case should be no exception. Request for Correction To maintain accuracy and uphold Wikipedia’s standards, I respectfully request that the map be updated to reflect internationally recognized borders. If a distinction between de jure (legal) and de facto (current control) status is necessary, it should be clearly marked without misleading implications of sovereignty. This is not a political request—it is a factual one. Maintaining the integrity of information, especially in times of conflict, is crucial. I appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to a constructive resolution. Salto Loco (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)