Wikimore

10 January 2026

12 January 2026

Deletion requests on 11 January 2026

January 11

File:Metal X (exe oc) by MikoPlushie.jpg

Character is clearly a derivative of (Neo) Metal Sonic, unlike File:Floee the Fox graphic - 2019.png, which is based on a typical fox in the Sonic art style (art style is not copyrighted). Also, unlike File:Scribbly Silver the Hedgehog.svg, the design here is close to the canon counterpart's. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 02:53, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete I don't think it looks particularly like the image here. However, I don't see how it's in scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

I uploaded the image specifically to use it in the Wikipedia article w:Sonic the Hedgehog fandom. It was in scope per COM:INUSE before PrincessPanda reverted it.

Edit: I'm voting

Keep, obviously. The designs are different enough.

Edit 2: Proof that it was in use. Also, it's been almost two months, come on.

Edit 3: Two and a half Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 09:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:4ocean logo.png

This file was initially tagged by ~2026-18645-3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Reason|source=https://www.4ocean.com/pages/shop-page-x-4ocean - Not convinced this is complex enough for copyright. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Below COM:TOO US. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Yes, and Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Logo tb horizontal vector.png

This file was initially tagged by Skazi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: сopyright violation: non-free logo above threshold of originality, no free license - Not convinced this is complex enough for copyright The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

This file is a commercial logo of Tanks Blitz, a registered trademark owned by Lesta Games. The logo is protected by copyright and trademark law and is not released under a free license. Skazi 11:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

The logo is the intellectual property of a Russian company. As stated in COM:TOO Russia: «There is no clear precedent in Russian courts for the threshold of originality for simple logos. Presumably, simple logo, which is part of corporate identity stated in brandbook (brand/visual guidelines or other similar corporate document), can be considered as copyrightable part of respective creative work». Event Horizon • Talk 15:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

COM:TOO Russia is extremely low unfortunately. Nakonana (talk) 12:41, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Skibidi Toilet toys at Walmart.jpg

Photos of toys with copyright characters Shark2272 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

its a photo that was taken with a camera though, i dont think walmart has a no-photos policy Ziggzevenzigma (talk) 13:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep COM:DEMINIMIS. Skyshifter (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete, the toys are the main subject of the photo so they cannot be de minimis. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Truong THPT Chuyen Hoang Van Thu.jpg

Tôi là người chụp và tải lên bức ảnh này Hihimeomeogaugau (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

"I am the one who took and uploaded this photo." You uploaded it a year ago. Why should it be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ABC-Bogen Lorenz Frølich 02.png

Out of scope: contrary to the file description, this image is an AI-generated reconstruction of File:ABC-Bogen Lorenz Frølich 01.jpg with some substantial differences (note, for example, that the cross-hatching in the background is much lighter). Omphalographer (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

If I use AI to crop any public domain photo, will you also demand its removal from Commons? Are we getting paranoid? A public domain photo cannot be modified on anyone's computer using any application! How many photos currently uploaded to Commons have been cropped, rotated, or filtered in some way? Should they all be removed? Abraham (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Keep Not really a "AI-generated reconstruction" just upscaled and cleaned. I have no objection to labelling it as upscaled. People cleanup images by hand in GIMP or Photoshop all the time. Wikisource encourages cleaning up images for books they host. --RAN (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Magwitch49 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: AI-generated faux landscape photos.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I do appreciate you looking at my photos!

It's completely my own work.o took them on my phone

I took the train photo at Lancaster train station where I used to work Magwitch49 (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Carl Gustav Rehnfeldt.png

Out of scope: this is an AI-generated image. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Similarly for File:Gustav Rehnfeldt y su hijo.png. Omphalographer (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

This Villapy (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Pierre Noel Le Cauchois Cathelin Louis-Jacques.jpg

A higher resolution version exists here: File:Pierre Noel Le Cauchois - avocat au Parlement de Normandie né à Rouen en 1740... - estampe - peint par M.lle de Noireterre ; gravé par Cathelin... - btv1b69425469 (cropped).jpg Chao Garden 🥀 ~ hello 05:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

C'est l'inverse qu'il faut faire car ma photo, bien que de plus faible définition est meilleure. De plus il n'y a aucune raison de supprimer une photo alors qu'il en existe une autre. Robert Valette (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Votre version est plus lumineuse, mais le texte est plus difficile à lire en raison de la qualité et de la taille de l'image. De plus, les détails de la gravure sont perdus.

Mais je laisse à d'autres le soin de porter un jugement. COM:Redundant Chao Garden 🥀 ~ hello 08:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kirby cafe - 52929903574.jpg

Violation of COM:FOP Japan. 2D work. (Oinkers42) (talk) 06:18, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep. I would argue that since the subject of this photo is the menu itself, the individual food items qualify as COM:DEMINIMIS. They are incidentally included, but not the primary focus. The COM:DEMINIMIS page mentions that cases where Copyrighted work X is identifiable but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X and Copyrighted work X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable as being OK Very likely, and I think that applies here. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete No, sorry, the food photos are much bigger than the text. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Kirby Café

Copyrighted food items, too complex and unique in design to be under COM:TOO.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:20260102 145735 Carrefour Kweiling, "Where are you from?".jpg

non-free 2D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep The only copyrightable element is the little dude in the top corner of the poster. I think that's de minimis, and if people disagree, I'm happy to pixelate it out. Just give me a ping. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:34, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep: I have explained all elements on the work at the "licensing" section. Please explain which 2D element you find non-free or copyvio. Again:

The subject is far under COM:TOO Taiwan, either dots or flags.
The little dude at top, the Carrefour logo at bottom: de minimis. See COM:DM Taiwan.

Saimmx (talk) 08:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep per others, de min and TOO apply Dronebogus (talk) 02:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Buffy Fish Owl.jpg

The author's name appears on the image. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion; we can crop it if it's an issue. Name in the photo is very similar to uploader's username, and metadata is present. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: Look more closely, the name appears at the bottom: easy to remove; but also in the middle of the image! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
I don't ever remember reading that watermarks are a deletion reason. Can you point to the policy that they are? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Buffy Fish Owl at Sundarban Tiger Reserve.jpg

The author's name appears on the image. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion; we can crop it if it's an issue. Name in the photo is very similar to uploader's username, and metadata is present. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Look more closely, the name appears at the bottom: easy to remove; but also in the middle of the image! Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kostas Provatas.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 08:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Why? It has been here since 2010, and I can't find any previous uploads elsewhere online with a quick search. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Fiscal General informa sobre su reunión con Fiscal de la CPI (2020-11-10).webm

This file was initially tagged by Trade as no license (No license since) Krd 08:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Comment It has a PD tag that lists a number of unrelated cases, none of which obviously apply. Which of these is supposed to be the basis for this file being PD? - — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Jmabel ! talk|Jmabel ! talk]] ([[User talk:Jmabel ! talk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jmabel ! talk|contribs]])
La plantilla enumera varios bases para ser en el dominio público, ninguno de los cuales se aplica obviamente. ¿Cuál de estos se supone que es la base para que este archivo sea el dominio público? - Jmabel ! talk 17:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
"Intellectual products generated under an employment relationship in the public sector—or financed through public funds—that generates intellectual property rights, will be considered to be in the public domain, while maintaining the authors' rights to public recognition." Trade (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Jmabel: --Trade (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Trade: that sounds valid to me. So why the tag as "no license"? Looks A-OK. - Jmabel ! talk 18:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
I dont know either. Must have been a mistake on my part Trade (talk) 20:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Paintings by Karl Hofer

Karl Hofer died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in Germany now. However, all of these paintings were created after 1930, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted.

They can be restored 95 + 1 years after creation (assuming publication in the year they were created) or 95 + 1 years after first publication if that is known to be later than the year of creation. I will add notes and undeletion categories.

Rosenzweig τ 09:10, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Suka786 (talk · contribs)

These photos are attributed to Rossi himself, but don't look like self-portraits. Metadata of File:Michael Matteo Rossi Photo.jpg indicates it's from Facebook ("FBMD").

Sinigh (talk) 09:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Drawings by Karl Hofer

Karl Hofer died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in Germany now. However, they were created in 1944, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2040.

Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:1931 paintings by Max Pechstein

Max Pechstein died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in Germany now. However, they were created in 1931, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2027.

Rosenzweig τ 09:44, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Paintings by Max Pechstein

Max Pechstein died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in Germany now. However, all of these paintings were created after 1930, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted.

They can be restored 95 + 1 years after creation (assuming publication in the year they were created) or 95 + 1 years after first publication if that is known to be later than the year of creation. I will add notes and undeletion categories.

Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Paintings by Willi Baumeister in the Karl-Ernst-Osthaus-Museum

Willi Baumeister died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in Germany now. However, all of these works were created after 1930, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted.

They can be restored 95 + 1 years after creation (assuming publication in the year they were created) or 95 + 1 years after first publication if that is known to be later than the year of creation. I will add notes and undeletion categories.

Rosenzweig τ 10:06, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Paintings by Willi Baumeister

Willi Baumeister died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in Germany now. However, all of these works were created after 1930, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted.

They can be restored 95 + 1 years after creation (assuming publication in the year they were created) or 95 + 1 years after first publication if that is known to be later than the year of creation. I will add notes and undeletion categories.

Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Is there any evidence that Willi Baumeister applied for copyright extension in the U.S.? --Sailko (talk) 21:03, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

There is no need to do that in URAA cases. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Files found with Special:Search/"Nicolas de Staël"

French painter Nicolas de Staël died in 1955, so these works are in the public domain in France now. However, all of these paintings were created after 1930, so (because of the URAA) they are still protected by copyright in the United States, and the files should be deleted.

They can be restored 95 + 1 years after creation (assuming publication in the year they were created) or 95 + 1 years after first publication if that is known to be later than the year of creation. I will add notes and undeletion categories.

Rosenzweig τ 10:25, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete no evidence of public domain in the U.S. Hekerui (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Ernat Duisenbekuly Bazil.jpg

Not own work. Original file from Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/CuPgU0yIIn9/ Mammut74 (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Haywood Patterson.png

Scanned from the back cover of Scottsboro Boy (see https://sites.nd.edu/rbsc/welcome-back-fall-2023/). On time renewal. Not sure if there could be dust jacket shenanigans/ Based5290 (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

https://www.ebay.com/itm/256676573867?_trksid=p4481478.c101506.m1851 shows dust jacket apparently without a copyright ntoice, and https://www.newspapers.com/image/1146029409/?clipping_id=new shows the same image, and that newspaper didn't have renewals. Deferring to someone else on whether this is enough to make this PD. Based5290 (talk) 06:12, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep per {{PD-US-dust-jacket}}. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 13:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:大溪普濟堂源起勘誤資料.pdf

Derivative work of 2D photos which did a failed licence review at ticket#2026010610008083 . Hamish (talk) 12:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, we have updated the PDF. YaoJermyn (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hamish

您好，感謝您先前協助確認關於公有領域的定義。

我已向著作權律師諮詢，確認以下照片已屬公有領域，並無任何法律疑慮。

敬請您放心，並請准予恢復原始照片。

謝謝您。

File:普濟堂三聖恩主.png

File:普濟堂戶主姚王氏阿玉廟守.png

File:普濟堂發起人姚回想.png

File:1917年姚王阿玉廟守與普濟堂照片.png YaoJermyn (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

File:বজরা শাহী মসজিদ, নোয়াখালী 09.jpg

There are better images of the subject, whereas this image has been taken from a poor angle. Redmin (talk) 12:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:StFrancisOfAsis.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200pa (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

“The sculpture was created by my late father. Copyright passed to five heirs, all of whom are now in the process of submitting a free license via Wikimedia’s VRT system.” Clare0054 (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:תוכנית אלון.svg

cropped version of another map that has the key removed and doesnt actually explain why its cropped NorthTension (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Klingsors letzte Stunde.jpg

Copy from https://in-direkt.de/gesellschaft/70455/wenn-die-muse-hermann-hesse-heimholt/ Gutnius (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Chinese characters written by prime minister Zhu Rongji, Heshun, Baoshan, Yunnan, China.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China. This is a calligraphy work written by former Chinese prime minister Zhu Rongji (born 1928) on August 5, 2006. It is protected by copyright, and its author, Zhu Rongji, is still alive. Under copyright law, calligraphy and painting works enter the public domain 50 years after the author's death in China, whereas the duration is extended to 70 years posthumously under U.S. copyright law. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China#Threshold of originality. Huangdan2060 (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Plakat Klingsor.jpg

Copy from https://www.altstadttheater-ingolstadt.de/Veranstaltung/klingsors-letzte-stunde-ein-hermann-hesse-singspiel/ Gutnius (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:LL-Q150 (fra)-M Conte2003-Alpha Bacar Barry.wav

texte de travail Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:St. Albertus Magnus in Braunschweig

copyvio; see Commons:Deletion requests/Files on St. Albertus Magnus (Braunschweig)

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Photo of Irina Georgiyevna Osipova.jpg

COM:WEBHOST Uploader's relative. No clear educational value. William Graham (talk) 16:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Decent portrait, and a user with 4,577 edits to Commons, forgetting about edits to any sister sites, is entitled to some personal images, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Ikan Kekek. Nakonana (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Živan Haravan (2016).jpg

no rights, not in use Aharonh (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:(20260109) Berlin 05.jpg

The advertising poster should be cut out. On the other hand, the image should be removed due to the strong presence of the advertisement poster in the center of the shot. Freedom of panorama can only protect permanently placed art. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep This is {{PD-GermanGov}} as a publication of the Bundeswehr. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Disagree I wasn’t aware of this exception. Thank you for pointing that out. Based on the public domain status of ordinances, statutes, and legal decrees, I don't yet see why that should also apply to advertising posters. Lukas Beck (talk) 08:27, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Point 2 of the law cited in the template expands this to a broader range of communications from the government, noting that these are also not objects of copyright. It does later prohibit modification of these works, but this is pretty clearly a non-copyright restriction. There are similar restrictions for certain types of US Government works, but we allow these because they are statutorily in the public domain like this. IronGargoyle (talk) 08:46, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

~~Delete~~ We do not allow media based on § 5 (2) UrhG for a reason. The prohibition to modify is not a non-copyright restriction, it is the same as the -ND clauses in the Creative Commons licenses, and we specifically disallow those (Commons:Licensing#Forbidden licenses) for the same reason. The German Wikipedia does not allow § 5 (2) UrhG files as well for the same reason (de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Amtliche Werke). --Rosenzweig τ 09:58, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Upon closer examination, I think that poster is below COM:TOO Germany, not original enough for copyright protection. So while what I wrote about § 5 (2) Urh stands, I don't think deletion is necessary in this particular case. --Rosenzweig τ 11:16, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

huh? a poster like that using a palette of colours is too simple? that seems counterintuitive. RoyZuo (talk) 13:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

i have no contest. i renamed it to File:(20260109) Giant Bundeswehr recruitment poster, Alexanderplatz, Berlin.jpg so that future users would understand the journalistic value and hence why i photoed and uploaded.--RoyZuo (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Kurultaydaki Özgür Özel sloganı.jpg

Per COM:DW. VOA is not the copyright holder of the photo in the wall. Günther Frager (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Hello @Günther Frager, The photograph was intended to capture the scene, not the photo on the wall in the scene. Kayra (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

It is irrelevant, it is not de minims. You can blur or crop the photo is you need to use for other purposes. Günther Frager (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Metro İstanbul, Esenler Yerleşkesi TRAM34 panosu.jpg

The Turkish freedom of panorama legislation doesn't apply to artworks located inside public buildings. Günther Frager (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Hello @Günther Frager, the location where the photo was taken belongs to Metro Istanbul. Metro Istanbul is not a public company; as it is a private company, it does not meet the relevant criteria. For your information. Kayra (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

@Kayra: a public building is a building were the general public has access, like schools, hospital, airports, train stations, etc. Did you read the actual link? It was taken neither in a public street nor in avenue nor in a square. Günther Frager (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Professor Kenzie.jpg

Image of user blocked on English Wikipedia Special:CentralAuth/OofoofXguyx124, only remaining upload Btrs (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Humberto Correia Picture.jpg

see discussion page: I fear the authorship of this picture isn't correct (and this isn't CC licensed) Mind Booster Noori (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

In case the uses of this image need to be replaced, there's File:Humberto Correia being interviewed (cropped).png now Mind Booster Noori (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Midwxst 11 12 22.png

I wish to have my contributions removed Trex1011 (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:20, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Aramis Garcia 9-11-24.jpg

I wish to have my contributions removed Trex1011 (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:21, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Ericdoa performing in Philadelphia, PA in November 2022.jpg

I wish to have my contributions removed Trex1011 (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Мемориальная доска в честь Героя Советского Союза А. Н. Юрина.jpg

also file:Мемориальная доска в честь Героя Советского Союза Юрина А.Н.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is after-WWII plaque. Taivo (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Finding the sculptors of commemorative plaques in Russia seems near impossible via internet (in my experience). All the information I could find is that the plaque is located at the Yurin Street. The street is named after the Soviet hero who is depicted in the plaque, and the street was named after him in 1950 , so that one could make an educated guess that the plaque was probably unveiled on that occasion to celebrate the renaming of the street. No clue regarding the sculptor of the plaque, unfortunately. Nakonana (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Памятник Шукшину В.М.jpg

also file:Памятник Шукшину Василию Макаровичу.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture and probably the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is 1989 statue and protected with copyright in USA until 2085 (95+1 years from publication) – in Russia maybe more, depends on when the sculptor died. Taivo (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Sculptors: Николай Викторович Звонков (b. 1936) and Михаил Алексеевич Кульгачев (b. 1947), per w:ru:Улица Шукшина (Барнаул). Nakonana (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/2026/01/11

January 11

Files uploaded by Magwitch49 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Kirby Café

Files in Category:Paintings by Karl Hofer

Files uploaded by Suka786 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Drawings by Karl Hofer

Files in Category:1931 paintings by Max Pechstein

Files in Category:Paintings by Max Pechstein

Files in Category:Paintings by Willi Baumeister in the Karl-Ernst-Osthaus-Museum

Files in Category:Paintings by Willi Baumeister

Files found with Special:Search/"Nicolas de Staël"

Files in Category:St. Albertus Magnus in Braunschweig