Commons:Deletion requests/2026/03/08

March 8

File:Mella - IMG 0070.JPG

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Dominican Republic for post-March 2007 images. The CAFTA-DR-compliant amendments restricted FoP to "personal use" of images only. The description plaque implies it was unveiled in 2006. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 00:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Anjing Chihuahua.jpg

This file was initially tagged by The Squirrel Conspiracy as no source (No source since) Not clear why claim of own work is doubted on what looks like a decent amateur photo. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&oldid=1177560943#Cannot_add_source_information_to_File%3AAnjing_Chihuahua.jpg_-_AbuseFilter_blocking Jmabel ! talk 02:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I tagged all of this uploader's remaining files as No Source after deleting a bunch of blatant copyvios. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Trio-Stempel crop.jpg

COM:PERSONAL COM:CB#Album covers -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep In use. Yann (talk) 09:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment The original file has been uploaded by an account globally locked and I think there's a kind of "intellectual / conceptual property" on this design, because it's a famous album cover. There might be a copyright owner. -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Yann: COM:CB#Album covers  Not OK Album covers (LP, CD, DVD, video cassettes, and so on) almost always carry copyright-protected designs, and photographs of them may not normally be uploaded to Commons. Physical ownership of an album merely licenses private broadcasts of the album's contents and does not transfer copyright ownership to the consumer. -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
A copyright for two hearts drawn with a pen? This looks farfetched to me. Yann (talk) 09:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
It's a complex combination made of a heart and another crossed-out heart, a specific text with address and phone number. The fact that the image is identifiable with only the text suggests an original creation. (Same as a short twitter messages, for example.) There is a deliberate arrangement of elements in space, certainly even a graphic research behind. The goal might be to create a visual impact, to inspire humour, special vibes or other feelings, matching the music. Very likely a minimalist creation based on a specific concept. (Like an advertisement.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:27, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
The photo doesn't show the album cover, but rather an address stamp that was used, much larger, for the album cover months later. The matchstick in the image is only meant to illustrate the size of the stamp impression. The album cover may be copyrighted, but the stamp impression certainly isn't. Havelbaude (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Sorry for your upload but the album cover is 100% identical. And according to other creations commercialized by the same artists, the graphic designers seem to have carefully arranged all the visual elements to achieve this style. -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
See also  deleted File:Trio album tragegriff.jpg per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trio album tragegriff.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

 Info There are also derivatives of this design, suggesting the conceptual work of graphic designers. Moreover, it's a famous visual with a Wikipedia page. Imagine derivatives productions, like another album by someone else, commercialized, it's just the failure guaranteed in justice courts! -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:27, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Monnaie - Plomb, Icosium (actuelle Alger), le IIᵉ siècle av. J.-C.png

Out of scope: this is an AI-generated image and looks completely different from the linked originals on Gallica. Omphalographer (talk) 02:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I simply merged the two images (obverse and reverse) into one file. Where exactly is the AI in that? The images themselves come from the originals on Gallica; I only combined them so both sides appear in the same image. Kingdz16 (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Is it possible that you linked to the wrong object on Gallica? The one I see at the link ("Monnaie : Plomb, Icosium, Maurétanie") is also a coin, but is shaped differently, is in much worse condition, and bears different images.
In any case - the metadata on this image file indicates that it was processed with ChatGPT. Please don't do that for historical images; it can sometimes make alterations to details. Use an image editor application to merge images instead. Omphalographer (talk) 06:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
So, to merge images I have to use a specific image editing application. Kingdz16 (talk) 09:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Summit of the Shield of the Americas.jpg

Duplicate of File:Leaders on the Shield of the Americas summit 2026.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Queenwe (talk · contribs)

All of this user's uploads are low-quality graphs made in Excel lacking necessary context or sourcing. The only response the user gave to requests for sourcing was files are out of date OK to delete as far as I am concerned. Data was correct when filed. by an IP address I'm assuming is the same user. Prior deletion requests for this user include:

list of files

Apocheir (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep the ones in use per COM:INUSE and involve contributors of the relevant articles, eg via pinging or posting some talk page posts. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep The sourcing for pretty much all of these is the Energy Information Administration, you can verify it through the data browser or their other reports. You not liking that these were made in Excel is not a justification to delete in bulk, nor the fact that they represent older data. Several are more recent. Are YOU going to upload new prettier graphs with the current data to replace these? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reywas92 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Veggmaleri på Halfdan Wilhelmsens alle 1A Tønsberg med Stoltenbergs gate nærmest.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Norwegian act on immaterial rights (lov om opphavsrett) states in section 31: Et verk kan avbildes når det varig er plassert på eller ved offentlig plass eller vei eller tilsvarende offentlig tilgjengelig sted. Dette gjelder likevel ikke når verket klart er hovedmotivet, og gjengivelsen brukes ervervsmessig. (A work may be depicted when it is permanently placed in or near a public square or road or similar publicly accessible place. This does not apply, however, when the work is clearly the main subject and the reproduction is used commercially. <Google translate>). The picture covers a streetscape and it is not necessary to delete it for being 'clearly the mmain subject'. Helge Høifødt (talk) 08:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Russian T-72A Main Battle Tank (Ank Kumar, Infosys Limited) 03.jpg

Copyright. Image on sign is not protected by FOP in Australia. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. 2D-artwork is included in the FoP copyright-exception in most FoP-countries, but not in... Australia... 43MZrinyiII (talk) 05:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Russian T-72A Main Battle Tank Shell (Ank Kumar, Infosys Limited).jpg

Copyright. Image on sign is not protected by FOP in Australia. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. 2D-artwork is included in the FoP copyright-exception in most FoP-countries, but not in... Australia... 43MZrinyiII (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:USA M115 203 MM Howitzer (Ank Kumar, Infosys Limited) 02.jpg

Copyright. Image on sign is not protected by FOP in Australia. See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs: "As a rule of thumb, detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs, such as the ones that are often found at historical or tourist sites, are almost always copyright-protected and photographs of them cannot usually be accepted. Noticeboards may include graphic images or extended textual matter, or both, and copyright is likely to subsist in both. 2D-artwork is included in the FoP copyright-exception in most FoP-countries, but not in... Australia... 43MZrinyiII (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bishop Salvador L. Lazo.jpg

Promotional? 24.211.70.219 15:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Kept: In use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bishop Salvador L. Lazo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Ubediplomacy as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for transferring. To explain my nomination: The uploader (User:Our Lady of Victories Church-SSPX) claims to represent Our Lady of Victories Church, which shares an SSPX affiliation with the photo's subject. However, there is no proof of this identity (per
Commons:Username policy), nor evidence that the church released the file under a CC license. – Ubediplomacy (talk｜contribs) 12:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:07.28 副總統參訪「開元日間照顧中心」，聽取臺南市政府社會局局長劉淑惠簡報該市推動長照2.0的現況與願景 (36050955732).jpg

non-free 2D poster in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 07:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Weak keep photos and logos are COM:De minimis, the text looks to be too simple for Sweat of the brow doctrine protection. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 06:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Таймураз Фидаров.jpg

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Target destroyed (talk) 08:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Engineering.webp

similar to File:Engineering Logo.png and misaligned photo Sezenkerem (talk) 09:32, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Frank Oehring 2025.jpg

schlechte Auflösung, besseres Portrait eingefügt Elisabeth Lux (talk) 11:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Grèce peignes olives.jpg

doublon exact avec File:Olive harvest combs. Anthidona. Greece.jpg Jebulon (talk) 11:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)


by the way, I am the photographer and the uploader of both !--Jebulon (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Boh3 ray3 (cropped).jpg

Old cropped version of File:Boh3 ray3.jpg. Not in use. IvanBondarev (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:John Langeloth Loeb Jr,.jpg

This pic has been previously published, is one example. It has meta data, but I find it unlikely that the uploader took it themself in 2015. Commons:But it's my own work! is available. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete if the uploader doesn't send permission to VRT. I've explained this to them several times, so @Nestadog please go over those comments. You cannot keep reuploading this image without proper permission, and the instructions to send that permission are on your talk page. HurricaneZetaC 17:56, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Graffiti, Chelyabinsk Граффити, Челябинск, Металлургический район, ул. Монтажников, Челябинскстальконструкция - panoramio.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for graffiti and probably the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Giuseppe Scartezzini

Commons maintains that there is no freedom of panorama in Switzerland for stained glass windows photographed from the inside of churches (see COM:FOP Switzerland and the discussion here). The artist died in 1967.

Felix QW (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Bay to Breakers 2011

Please refer to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Uploads by Fabe56 where this uploader has uploaded multiple files uncritically from Flickr. This tranche is a set of pictures of random unnamed people Event though the Flicker licence is acceptable, they appear to be a collection of private pictures, possibly containing the uploader in some cases, possible in none. They appear to have no educational value. Commons is not a host for private pictures. This diff where the uploader states "All my upload must be deleted ASAP, so do not waste time here." may be relevant.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep, the annual event is notable enough to have Wikipedia articles en:Bay to Breakers in 4 langauges, so these images have educational use for depicting the participants and their attire, and also the activities of the 2011 event. File:Bay to Breakers 2011 Up.jpg is COM:INUSE in multiple wikis and wasn't uploaded by Fabe56. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Keep IMO inappropriate bulk deletion request; found this discussion from in scope file in use in multiple projects. Seems overly broad and indiscriminate listing at least. From sample check, many show notable public event (en:w:Bay to Breakers). More descriptive names would be helpful in many cases, but this is not a deletion issue. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:03, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Bay to Breakers 2012

Please refer to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Uploads by Fabe56 where this uploader has uploaded multiple files uncritically from Flickr. This tranche is a set of pictures of random unnamed people Event though the Flicker licence is acceptable, they appear to be a collection of private pictures, possibly containing the uploader in some cases, possible in none. They appear to have no educational value. Commons is not a host for private pictures. This diff where the uploader states "All my upload must be deleted ASAP, so do not waste time here." may be relevant.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment Just a note that en:Bay to Breakers is an annual event in San Francisco and not sure if all of these from a public event can be considered private photos.
Additionally, the "All my upload must be deleted ASAP, so do not waste time here" comment by the uploader is for Category:While42 SF No 12 w/ FACCSF at FrenchTechHub.
Cheers // sikander { talk } 🦖 21:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
 Keep, as mentioned above, the annual event is notable enough to have Wikipedia articles en:Bay to Breakers in 4 langauges. So, I think these images have educational use for depicting the participants and their attire, and also the activities of the 2012 event. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Grosse Lichtplastik Modell ausgestellt in der Neuen Nationalgalerie Berlin 2025 Photo Frank Oehring.jpg

Higher resolution version of the photo was already uploaded / Höhere Auflösung des Bildes wurde bereits hochgeladen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grosse_Lichtplastik_Modell_Neuen_Nationalgalerie_Berlin_2025_Photo_Frank_Oehring.jpg Nylki (talk) 13:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Геология и перспективы алмазоносности Пучеж-Катунской зоны.jpg

This image is vertical and small, out of bounds. Куйгорож (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:De muzikale clowns Babusio's - ALIJN 2007-016-044.tif

No free license at source, the source states that the copyright situation has not been evaluated. Too recent for e.g. {{PD-old-assumed}}. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Bob Dylan - Another Side of Bob Dylan.jpg

The first US pressing has a copyright notice, see back cover or the listing. The copyright notice is located in the right lower corner, so it cannot be linked to an specific element, and states "© Bob Dylan 1964 / All right reserved". Notice that according to Ch.4 Sec.404(a) a single copyright notice is enough for collective regardless of the ownership of the copyright in the contributions, here the copyrightable works are the lyrics, and the photograph. Günther Frager (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the Kabardino-Balkar ASSR (1978–1992).png

Duplicate of File:Emblem of the Kabardin ASSR.svg. Boston Mayflower (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the Kalmyk ASSR (1941–1942).png

Duplicate of File:Emblem of the Kalmyk ASSR (1940–1943, 1958–1978).svg. Boston Mayflower (talk) 14:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the Kalmyk ASSR (1940–1941).png

Duplicate of File:Emblem of the Kalmyk ASSR (1940–1943, 1958–1978).svg. Boston Mayflower (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the Kalmyk ASSR (1957–1978).png

Duplicate of File:Emblem of the Kalmyk ASSR (1940–1943, 1958–1978).svg. Boston Mayflower (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:A man holds a leash on a nude woman at Folsom Street Fair 2013.jpg

This is grossly misogynistic and has no business being the first image on the Sunglasses entry, where not only nonconsenting adults but also children are seeing it. Please remove. JoanConstantinople (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I have removed some of the categories per the COM:POLA guideline. Just to let you know, images with nudity are allowed on Commons as long they are in scope. Since the image is COM:INUSE in multiple wikis, it is automatically considered in scope, so we should  Keep this image. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Wikipedia does not censor legal images or decide on issues such as "misogynism". How images are used is unrelated to whether they should be deleted and should be discussed on article talk pages, but I see it was likely a vandal edit that got reverted. There is therefor no basis for the nomination. Drew McNish (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep. It's already been removed from the sunglasses article, making that objection irrelevant, and is within the scope for Commons. Voyager640 (talk) 05:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

File:The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959) trailer - Watson 1.png

Even when it lacks copyright notice, the US trailer contains film footages of the British film that is still copyrighted in the UK. Per current British law, the film's UK copyright lasts after lifetime of a surviving screenwriter, director, and composter (alt doc). Director Terence Fisher died in 1980. Composer James Bernard died in 2001. Writer Peter Bryan died in 1972. Since Bernard died last, the film's UK copyright lasts until the end of 2071.

Furthermore, uncertain when the US trailer was first released in theatres before the film itself was released in the US a couple months after the film's UK release. I doubt the release was simultaneous, so... COM:PCP. George Ho (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Street art in Lyon

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in France.

Günther Frager (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Günther, thanks for all your work on Wikimedia Commons, which is essential. About two of my files you requested to delete, I do understand the 2D artworks in this place can't stay online because there is no freedom of panorama in France. Nevertheless, I didn't publish these files to show these artworks, but because of the demolition of the architecture above. Do you think I could crop them and then you delete the original files ? Best,16:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Pemberlaid (talk) 16:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
@Pemberlaid: if your intention was to illustrate something else, then you can indeed crop or blur the artworks. The closing admin will remove the problematic versions and keep the others. Günther Frager (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
I just cropped the two files, so you can remove the problematic versions. Thanks !
15:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Pemberlaid (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Street art in Lille

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in France.

Günther Frager (talk) 18:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)


  • Well, not much to say, except that many of these murals are public commissions deliberatly placed in public spaces and sometimes on public buildings, while others are unauthorised, placed there to be seen as part of the landscape. I am not sure that a policy "cover this breast which I cannot behold..." is still appropriate in this day and age. --Velvet (talk) 08:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    French intellectual property protects the moral and patrimonial rights of artists regardless if their works were commissioned by the state or were the product of vandalism, that is well documented in the link I provided in the DR rationale. The policy in Commons is to respect the local copyright laws and has nothing to do with covering breasts, penises or vaginas. Günther Frager (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    Of course, you're right, I was just joking. But I'll probably continue to download sometimes this kind of landscapes for posterity, long after their creators are gone.--Velvet (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
About the "Lille 2019 2.jpg" file:
Hello,
You're right, I should have search for the author and ask him/her the permission to publish this image.
Fortunately I found out the authors (https://www.noty-aroz.com/) and just sent an email to ask if they are ok for this photo to be present in Wikimedia Commons.
I'll keep you posted when I'll receive their position. PiRGoif (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
@PiRGoif: please follow the instructions in COM:VRT. Günther Frager (talk) 11:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the link !
I've checked the other files, they doesn't seem to be created by the same artists.
I'm sending an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. PiRGoif (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • VRTS Ticket:2026030910011515 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:01, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    According to the ticket, the sculptor of File:Lille 2019 2.jpg explicitely denies that the image of their work be published for commercial purposes. Thus I had to issue a speedy delete via copyvio for this image. The other files in the list are not subject to Ticket:2026030910011515. Mussklprozz (talk) 20:43, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

File:BBFC 15A 2019.svg

This looks fake to me. The BBFC—to the best of my knowledge—has never implemented a 15A rating. The Republic of Ireland has one, but that's a different country, different classification body. Furthermore, the source that this symbol supposedly came from was dead at the time it was uploaded: https://web.archive.org/web/20240801000000*/https://www.bbfc.co.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/BBFC-Classification-Guidelines.pdf Betty Logan (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, image is currently COM:INUSE in wikidata d:Q134777959, which suggested the 15A rating was used in Belfast. Do you know if this image is the one they have used? Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Move to Unofficial BBFC 15A 2019.svg. The description clearly states it's unofficial, anyway. Zenphia1 (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
 Speedy keep just rename to "Belfast 15A rating.svg" Evelino Ucelo (talk) 09:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Saransk Fortress.jpg

Created and first published in 2006 as per description. No evidence of PD. Komarof (talk) 19:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Это изображение было создано в 18 веке. Это не изображение автора этой книги. -- Cossrad (talk) 19:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
    Забавно. Даже школьники знают, что такая орфография появилась в русском языке только в XX веке. Komarof (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
    • So it's probably post-revolutionary, but from the style of the graphics it is almost certainly far older than 2006. - Jmabel ! talk 20:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
      Despite all suggestions about when it could be created, we still need to know the year of first legal publication as per COM:Russia. Komarof (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
      @Jmabel "it is almost certainly far older than 2006" - Of course. Even the description state that the book was published in 1961. But this image was taken from the archives of the Mordovian ASSR and is not by the author of this book. Cossrad (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
      Well done. Being first published in 1961, it's not free until 2032. Komarof (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
      @Cossrad: "Mordovian" => "Moldovian"? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 22:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
      w:Mordovia. )) Komarof (talk) 22:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
 Weak keep the map was created in 17th century in a country what lacked any copyright laws, so it is enter PD after creation. Russian federation is historical, but not legal successor of Tsardom of Russia ("home" country of this map), so russian copyright law very likely not apply. Added text looks to be below COM:TOO. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 09:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
This map was created and published in 1961, based on 17th century textual chronicles. This is what we see. If, as always, you have a dissenting opinion based on your own bias and your own assumptions, prove it. Komarof (talk) 10:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Well ok, this file should be restored in 2057. SomeFancyUsername (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Saransk road center.jpg

Created and first published in 1961, the author died in1983, as per description. No evidence of PD. Komarof (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Вообще-то данный файл не является созданным автором этой книги. -- Cossrad (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
    Почитайте COM:EVID/ru и просветите нас, кто же автор, и почему его работа находится в общественном достоянии. Komarof (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Kayra (talk · contribs)

Files that are COM:REDUNDANT. Each file has explanation, come to deletion request please.

i tried to saw any small detail to save the file i check. so, these marked files are has been gone into filtration. i mostly hesitated when i put them here. and i put them accordingly COM:REDUNDANT policy. if they are in some place in wikimedia projects, or they are part of series of files i didnt put it here.

  1. File:Mecidiye Metro İstasyonu 132025 7.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Mecidiye Metro İstasyonu 132025 8.jpg( Keep). reason: 8 has better composition. spotlight on 7 eating my eyes. very little diffrences.
  2. File:Mecidiye Metro İstasyonu 132025 4.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Mecidiye Metro İstasyonu 132025 3.jpg( Keep). reason: almost exact copies. but 3 has little more file size.
  3. File:Fatih Metro İstasyonu 14122024 3.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Fatih Metro İstasyonu 14122024.jpg( Keep). reason: 14122024 is in use. very little diffrences.
  4. File:Batı Merkez 1112024 4.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Batı Merkez 1112024 5.jpg( Keep). reason: 5 has better composition. 4 is just(i guess)0,01* diffrent angle
  5. File:Büyükada’da bulunan Saat Kulesi 27102024.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Büyükada’da bulunan Saat Kulesi 27102024 2.jpg( Keep). reason: 2 has more file size. very little diffrences.
  6. File:Ankara YHT GAR dış kısmı 7.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Ankara YHT GAR dış kısmı 6.jpg( Keep). reason: 6 has more details. very little diffrences.
  7. File:Ankara YHT GAR dış kısmı 4.jpg( Delete) and File:Ankara YHT GAR dış kısmı 3.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Ankara YHT GAR dış kısmı 5.jpg( Keep). reason: almost same copies. 5 has more file size between them.
  8. File:Ankaragücü istasyonun dış kısmı 2.jpg( Delete) and File:Ankaragücü istasyonun dış kısmı 1.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Ankaragücü istasyonun dış kısmı 3.jpg( Keep). reason: almost same copies. 3 has more file size between them.
  9. File:Hannibal Monument, TÜBİTAK Gebze Campus 23122025 4.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Hannibal Monument, TÜBİTAK Gebze Campus 23122025.jpg( Keep). reason: very little diffrences. 23122025 has more file size.
  10. File:Uludağ Üniversitesi Metro İstasyonu M2 2025 1.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Uludağ Üniversitesi Metro İstasyonu M2 2025.jpg( Keep). reason: very little diffrences. 2025 is in use.
  11. File:Hatice Turhan Valide Sebili ve Çeşmesi 2025 2.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Hatice Turhan Valide Sebili ve Çeşmesi 2025 3.jpg( Keep). reason: almost same copies. 3 has more file size.
  12. File:BU-1 otobüs hattı, Burgazada 04092025 1.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:BU-1 otobüs hattı, Burgazada 04092025 2.jpg( Keep). reason: very little diffrences. i believe 2 is better because of bicycle.
  13. File:Haydarpaşa Garı 05082025 3.jpg( Delete) redundant with File:Haydarpaşa Garı 05082025 2.jpg( Keep). reason: same photos, almost same file size. 3 has more file size(0,03 mb diffrence)

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 21:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Actor Waheed Murad 1964.jpg

Bottom left watermark says this is AI generated content. In any case, even if this was published in 1964, it would only have expired in copyright in 2015 in Pakistan, thus it would have had its copyright extended in the US in 1996 per COM:URAA. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 21:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Hardly makes any difference since the actor died in 1983. Image has to be more than 50 years old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-16068-53 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please see COM:URAA. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 13:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
      • Strong Keep***. It is not AI. Just background blurred that's perfectly fine per COM:URAA.
 Speedy keep the ones in use per COM:INUSE

File:Giantssemifinal.jpg

Falsely claimed as 'own work' and uploaded at a poor resolution compared to the original; file originally sourced from Huddersfield Giants website. Hullian111 (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Category:Commons pages with broken file links