Commons:ANB
Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP
|
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vandalism [] |
User problems [] |
Blocks and protections [] |
Other [] |
|
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
| Archives | |||
130, 129, 128, 127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 | 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 | ||
Category:Commons administrators#*Administrators'%20noticeboard/Blocks%20and%20protections
Note
- For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
- Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}}is available for this. - Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
User:Hfhtdjf
Hfhtdjf (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) Any admin please block this user for 7 days as he had uploaded many covyvios despite the previous deletions. Junior Jumper (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- COM:IU violation, too. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- On that last, I don't think pseudo-random names of 8 "normal" characters or less are a problem. - Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: No, they are not a problem. Junior Jumper (talk) 11:21, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- On that last, I don't think pseudo-random names of 8 "normal" characters or less are a problem. - Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Not done @Junior Jumper, it looks to me like you gave them a warning to stop doing this 5 minutes and threatening that if they continue they will be blocked. Five minutes later, you reported them here and asked for a block. Please, in the future, don't do both! Think about it: "If you don't stop, you're going to be in trouble. [Person does nothing.] You are now in trouble." Just not an appropriate sequence.
Your warning stands, but it pretty much precludes me from blocking them until they upload another copyvio. - Jmabel ! talk 21:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: OK sir 🫡 Junior Jumper (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel They did it again. See File:C. P. Radhakrishnan with Modi.jpg and File:Syed Ata Hasnain with VP.jpg. Agent 007 (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
image protection
- Proper2oo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Hello,
due to vandalism my image on wikimedia was fully protected and I couldnt make any changes to it (referring to this map) I was advised to make a request here so that I would be able to edit and overwrite my file.
Thanks! Proper2oo (talk) 23:10, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Proper2oo: I'll lower the protection level on that, but given how much it's been vandalized, my guess is that it should be re-raised when you are done.
- Also, the color for tributaries in your key doesn't match the one in your map, and you should probably get those in line with one another.
Deceased user
I just read that User:Горбунова М.С. is deceased. In January, someone wrote about her death on her user page using her account. Should this account be blocked and globally locked? Is this the right place to request this? Thanks in advance --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Robert Flogaus-Faust: could you say where you read that? The first-person statement (on her user page) of having died is really weird. - Jmabel ! talk 19:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I read this first on Commons talk:Quality_images_candidates#In_memoriam, but https://www.inaturalist.org/people/1453678 and the user's personal page contain the same kind of statements. I don't speak any Russian and I don't know whether there are any obituaries. However, if the statments about the death of this user are false, then she must have either lost control of her accounts or made these statements herself. I suggest that this is very unlikely, except that some friend or relative may have shared her login data and added the day of her death, and that a block would be o.k. anyway. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:52, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- I've protected her userpage on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Ymblanter, Ahonc, Юрий Д.К., Андрей Романенко: can a Russian speaker review this and make a request on m:Steward requests/Global#Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:49, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- You already have 2 Russian speakers who reviewed the fact on the QI talk page.
- I wrote on Meta. Анастасия Львоваru/en 06:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Lvova, thank you. I overlooked the QIC discussion, but regardless I feel more comfortable with a Russian speaker making the actual request. You worded the request better than I could have. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:46, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Vijaysoren
Vijaysoren (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Violation of Commons:NLT --Trade (talk) 00:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment File:Vijay Kumar Soren's volgur words.png uploaded by ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ is itself an importing of en-wiki drama to Commons. It looks like on his own en-wiki talk page, Vijay made some legal threats, which he then walked back (though you'd never know the latter from what was posted on Commons, and the Commons file page lacked a link back to the source; I had to read the image and type). There was absolutely no good reason for a screenshot of this on Commons, and posting it looks like harassment of Vijaysoren. If you want to reference a diff, do it with a diff, not a screenshot.- Vijaysoren's response on the linked page linked by Trade is a link to a PDF (plus some categories that in the circumstances look only mildly contentious, but which don't belong on a file talk page, and have already been removed). If that PDF exists, it is probably not accessible in the U.S., because all I see if I click on the link is "NoSuchKey", so I have no idea what the PDF might say.
- Looks to me like two users importing drama from another wiki and trouting each other. There may be more going on, but my reaction is that we should delete the file and either (a) block neither or (b) block both. I don't really care which. - Jmabel ! talk 03:56, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- I am extremely sorry for uploading this screenshot to Commons. My intention was not to distribute it on Wikimedia Commons; I only uploaded it to show him the comments that he removed from their talk page, and to warn him not to use that kind of language here, which he removed from their talk.
- Thanks,
- ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ (talk) 01:15, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- @ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ: I hope you now understand that the correct way to do that is simply to link a Diff. No reason for a screenshot, and certainly not one uploaded here. - Jmabel ! talk 02:48, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you - ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ (talk) 03:47, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- @ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ: I hope you now understand that the correct way to do that is simply to link a Diff. No reason for a screenshot, and certainly not one uploaded here. - Jmabel ! talk 02:48, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Don't have any strong feelings towards the proposal to block ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ --Trade (talk) 04:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC)- Comment: I have broken up the URL so they actually work. I suggest an admin look at them to determine whether or not a legal threat has been made--Trade (talk) 04:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- https://www.meity.gov.in/static/uploads/2024/06/2bf1f0e9f04e6fb4f8fef35e82c42aa5.pdf
- https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13116/1/it_act_2000_updated.pdf
- https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2024/02/202402021139959703.pdf
- @ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ: --Trade (talk) 04:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'd say borderline. Again, if given that I believe ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ's conduct here had already crossed a line, I'm a lot less concerned with how Vijaysoren responded to that than I otherwise would be.
- There may be other problems with Vijaysoren's conduct that merit a block, but I'm not going to block only one party in what looks to me like a conflict with a pretty balanced set of violations. - Jmabel ! talk 19:18, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
I seem to be the only admin who has weighed in here. I would strongly suggest that some other admin resolve Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vijay Kumar Soren's volgur words.png, preferably soon. I believe have made my own opinion clear in the DR. - Jmabel ! talk 19:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Done File deleted. This account is now globally locked. And I sent 2 strong warnings to ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ. Yann (talk) 20:11, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I think that the behavior of Vijaysoren was bad in making the threat (but that is an enwiki and WMF problem dealt with by both bodies), but worse for us on Commons was the behavior of ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ in dragging the dispute here. For those that just want to read the diff, see en:special:diff/1351006810. The bad stuff was added in en:special:diff/1350989710/1350999227. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:15, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: that is pretty much my take as well. - Jmabel ! talk 20:57, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Tbf he literally did repeated those same kind threats on Commons. Hence why I made this request Trade (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- No. Vijaysoren's raw links to pdfs of India law, the impetus for this thread, do not comprise legal threats--verily, links that are at best tantamount to "I believe there's a violation Statute X" are distinct from "I am going to sue you for violating Statute X"; we effectively do the former with routine copyvio tags ("I believe there's a violation of USC 17 ..."). Vijaysoren had threatened no legal action on the Commons when this request was posted, and never has. Also noting for posterity that ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ uploaded the screenshot of the en.wiki threats at 11:43, 25 April 2026, after Vijaysoren self-removed the threats on en.wiki (11:23, 25 April 2026); to the extent this is/was even a Commons matter, it is because ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ imported it. Эlcobbola talk 21:27, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Commons:NLT needs a rework then because it's currently very open ended in it's current form Trade (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- I believe COM:NLT quite deliberately leaves room for admins to make judgement calls, including whether to allow someone a chance to withdraw a given threat.
- I don't view merely linking statutes like this as a threat, and I don't think we have anything in policy that suggest it is (though I would feel differently about someone arbitrarily linking statutes about a miscellany of violent crimes, and not because of the legal threat). Telling someone they could be in legal trouble over doing what they did is very different from threatening a lawsuit. - Jmabel ! talk 04:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Commons:NLT needs a rework then because it's currently very open ended in it's current form Trade (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- No. Vijaysoren's raw links to pdfs of India law, the impetus for this thread, do not comprise legal threats--verily, links that are at best tantamount to "I believe there's a violation Statute X" are distinct from "I am going to sue you for violating Statute X"; we effectively do the former with routine copyvio tags ("I believe there's a violation of USC 17 ..."). Vijaysoren had threatened no legal action on the Commons when this request was posted, and never has. Also noting for posterity that ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ uploaded the screenshot of the en.wiki threats at 11:43, 25 April 2026, after Vijaysoren self-removed the threats on en.wiki (11:23, 25 April 2026); to the extent this is/was even a Commons matter, it is because ᱯᱨᱚᱯᱷᱮᱥᱥᱚᱨ imported it. Эlcobbola talk 21:27, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection of File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2026 group photo 01.jpg?
The photo File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2026 group photo 01.jpg is the front-page image of MediaWiki.org, and attracting the usual level of drive-by editing. Perhaps it should be semi-protected, like File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2025 Group photo from drone.jpg, last year's, was? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- +1 — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:30, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Sensible and done thanks Herby talk thyme 14:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Protection request for persistently vandalized categories
Please semi-protect Category:Nguyễn Cao Kỳ, Category:Nguyễn Văn Đài, Category:Cù Huy Hà Vũ, Category:Peter Nguyen Van Hung, they were constantly vandalized by w:WP:LTA/NDC. Sakurase (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Itatiram
Uploading copyrighted works for a second time after deletion request, no communication. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 13:13, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Phillipedison1891: please notify users when you report them here. I've done it for you this time. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 14:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Profounder User
Profounder User (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Sockpuppet of . See File:Mayor of brookhaven deleted since I made it.png. Uploads are all screenshots of deletion log entries for articles created by this sockmaster. Geoffroi 19:26, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm reporting this here because this user is uploading images that reflect a grievance about being blocked for socking on en.wiki. The images should obviously be deleted, and the user is an obvious sock if an admin wants to block them. I felt it was appropriate to post this here because of the obvious socking and the unconstructive uploads. Thanks. Geoffroi 20:32, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
m:SRG#Global mass (b)lock 2m:SRG § Global lock for Alex132219georgia and Profounder User. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 23:12, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment The 2 unused AI-edited images could probably be deleted after a regular DR. Yann (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Revision deletion request for privacy
I have edited File:Disney_071.JPG to remove my real name. Could an administrator please perform a Revision Deletionon the previous versions to hide my personal information from the history? Thank you. ~2026-28874-25 (talk) 23:33, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- This is ridiculous. You removed the name of the building, which is tantamount to vandalism, and which I will revert. If you want your account name changed, get your account name changed: meta:Changing username. - Jmabel ! talk 02:56, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- I've tried cleaning up the file, but I don't seem to be able to suppress the name of the original uploader. Will some other admin please have a look at this and see if they can somehow make that go away? (No idea why this isn't working, pretty certain I've done this before.) I've cleaned it out everywhere in the file history. I'm assuming that this is a legitimate request, it would be pretty weird for someone to make something up about an account with exactly one edit, 17 year ago. - Jmabel ! talk 03:20, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- (not hot-linking the file to avoid Streisand effect) - Jmabel ! talk 03:21, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Done To hide the uploader's name, you need to delete the file. Yann (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Wow. That's a pain. - Jmabel ! talk 18:51, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Convenience link now that that is sorted out & Streisand effect shouldn't be an issue: File:Disney 071.JPG. - Jmabel ! talk 18:54, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Username policy violation?
It seems pretty clear that [name suppressed; visible in history if you really need it] meets COM:IU ~2026-29031-71 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Reported user is now at m:SRG § Global lock. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 01:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Done Blocked until they get globally blocked Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Gbawden and @~2026-29031-71: the account got suppressed. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:33, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Sofia at Digger Monkey
User:Sofia at Digger Monkey has been renamed as requested and has been waiting to be unblocked. The blocking admin The Squirrel Conspiracyhasn't been active in a couple of weeks. Could someone unblock please? Cabayi (talk) 16:29, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Done Nux (talk··dyskusja) 18:09, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you all! Sofia at Digger Monkey (talk) 09:14, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Block request for User:Ghana Potage
Ghana Potage (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) An account solely for the purpose of vandalism on the User talk:Ђидо page. Ђидо (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Done, user blocked and talk page history hidden. Also blocked Special:Contributions/RwandaMminerFrancFranc, who vandalized on User talk:RobloxMiner$$. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 05:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Protect Template:Cc-by-4.0 Liliana Avizzano Cicala
Please apply template protection to this license template, for cc-by-4.0 authorization via ticket:2026051610004328. Thanks, Arrow303 (talk) 14:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- It is not facing vandalism, so I don't see a need to protect it
- e.g. Template:WikiRantau CC BY-SA 4.0 isn't protected Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Whyiseverythingalreadyused I was teached to always ask template editor protection for license templates with VRTS ticket that I create as permissions agent, that's why i asked Arrow303 (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2026 (UTC)