File:Victor hugo morales eg 1982.jpg

First published in 1982, the photo was still under copyright in Argentina on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was automatically restored under the URAA and will only expire after the full 95-year term (public domain on 1 January 2078). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep per Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/10#Mass_URAA_copyright_violation_of_El_Gráfico_images? And previous DR of files published on El Gráfico : Commons:Deletion requests/Menotti _ Fma12 (talk) 12:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Then {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is the incorrect tag for this file. Need to have relevant US PD tag instead if it was published in the US within 30 days etc. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

user talk:Günther Frager is one of the editors who has been adding the URAA template to all El Gráfico photos. I discussed that issue with him, but he insisted on keeping the tags. You are welcome to leave your arguments on his talk page so I can't ping him. Fma12 (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

@Fma12: I might have added a template to some photos, but it is not something systematic. I do remember some discussions about URAA with you, but I don't remember asking to add or to keep this template. Maybe I changed my mind or I got misinterpreted, do you have an specific link?

Anyways, probably you want me opinion now. The template {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} cannot be used in any file uploaded after March 1, 2012 as the template clearly states. This is an argument that I frequently use in my DRs and in fact it was explicitly added to the template after this DR. Regarding the Gráfico magazine. I indeed found out that it was published simultaneously in the US and due to it I don't create DR for them. What I don't know is if the copyright formalities required are fulfilled or not. I won't support a deletion unless we have access to the full issue and check the copyright notice is placed somewhere (magazines don't require one next to each photo / article)..Günther Frager (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Mrs Elizabeth Petty (1875–1947) Ernest Townsend died 1944.jpg

Mrs Elizabeth Petty is an oil portrait painted in 1937 by Ernest Townsend (1880–1944). In the UK, Townsend’s works were originally protected for life + 50 years, expiring at the end of 1994. The EU Directive 93/98/EEC extended copyright terms to life + 70 years, and the UK implemented this on 1 January 1996 with retroactive effect for works still protected in other EU countries. Because Townsend’s works were protected elsewhere in Europe, this painting re-entered copyright in the UK on 1 January 1996 and remained protected until 31 December 2014 (70 years after his death). Therefore, its U.S. copyright was restored under the COM:URAA and will last for 95 years from publication, expiring on 1 January 2033. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

This reads as its Ok, its Ok, its fine..... oh small legal and unintended consequence means that although the artist will gain no benefit what so ever, we need to damage our encyclopedia to enforce a copyright that no one cares about. I see that its a member of a cat below so I guess you are fully aware of the potential damage. I suggest that the foundations lawyers should underwrite this interpretation and if we believe we have no other option then we should counter sue google, X and facebook for breaking this, useless and valueless, legal point. Not happy. Victuallers (talk) 09:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:John Rambo (athlete)

The 1964 Japanese Olympic photo was still under copyright in Japan on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will last for the full 95-year term (public domain on 1 January 2060 at the earliest).

• File:John Rambo (1964).jpg
• File:John Thomas, Valeriy Brumel, John Rambo 1964.jpg

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:DЯAW♡ME ロゴ.jpg

投稿者自身による著作物であることを確認できないため。 X200b (talk) 01:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sir John Carew Pole (1902–1993), 12th Bt.jpg

The 1944 portrait was still under copyright in the UK on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will only expire after the full 95-year term (public domain on 1 January 2040). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Flag of Iran Protests (2026).png

There are better versions: File:Flag of Iran cut out.svg, File:Flag of Iran with a hole.svg. Поль Крол Злой Диктатор (talk) 01:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Geoffrey Fisher by RG Eves.jpg

Although the work briefly entered the UK public domain in 1991 under the former life +50 rule, EU Directive 93/98/EEC restored copyright in the UK from 1 January 1996 because it was still protected in other EU countries. As a result, the painting remained under UK copyright until 31 December 2011. Since it was copyrighted in its source country on 1 January 1996, its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will expire on 1 January 2030. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:The Illustrated London News 1937

Although the illustration is public domain in the UK (author died 1950), it was still under UK copyright on 1 January 1996, so U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will only expire after 95 years from publication (1 January 2033).

• File:Brewer Coronation1.png
• File:Coronation of George VI 1937.jpg
• File:Crowning of George VI (cropped).jpg
• File:Crowning of George VI (full).jpg
• File:Crowning of George VI.jpg

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Fleentstones by PC36.ogg

The claim to the public domain status of the composition of the Flintstones Theme rests upon the argument of a reddit post who themselves do not state this with certainty. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 01:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Feel free to remove this if need be. RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 08:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Emile Baes - Portrait of Albert I of Belgium on the banks of the Yser.jpg

Although the painting is now public domain in Belgium/France (author died 1953), it was still under copyright there on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will not expire until 1 January 2028. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Jaschik Roninok kincse ronin dress sketch 1936.jpg

Still under copyright in Hungary on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will only expire after the full 95-year term (public domain on 1 January 2032). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Wikimania 2023 - Robertsky and Tsuna - RSKY.jpg

The photographer would need to send permission to VRT (bystander selfie). Also File:Portrait of Robertsky, 2023 at Wikimania 2023.jpg JayCubby (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@JayCubby Ticket sent in, ticket:2026020610002658. Note that I am not responding to the ticket myself as a VRT agent due to the apparent COI here. Robertsky (talk) 07:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Zdjęcie Witkorii Rudkowskiej.png

As the description suggests, she's just an ordinary candidate for local government. This isn't the place to post photos of election candidates. Image is out of scope COM:EV Uniminomumm (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:The Pink Dress, 1934 by William Nicholson.jpg

The 1934 painting was still under copyright in the UK on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and will last until 1 January 2030 (95 years after publication). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:DeFunes-Bourvil-Italie-1964.png

Unjustified usage of {{PD-Italy}}. The source indicates the copyright holder is the French film company en:Les Films Corona and it is likely a promotional photo. The photo is clearly still copyrighted in France and the US due to URAA. To keep it, we need evidence that it was first published in Italy. Günther Frager (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep Perfectly in touch with the Public domain in Italy. The film was released in Italy first. - Groupir ! (talk) 06:41, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Groupir !: could you provide evidence for you claim? Günther Frager (talk) 08:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  A premiere in Roma one month before the French release . Groupir ! (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  That is when the film was premiered, but this is a photo and it is not precisely a frame from that film. As far as I remember, Bourvil drives the Cadillac while De Funes follows him in a different car. You need to provide evidence when this precise photo was published, not when a different, although related, artwork was published. Günther Frager (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  The film was released at that time, so were the promotional photos. This kind of photos (exploitation photos) were always displayed on the entrances of cinemas to give a preview of the film. - Groupir ! (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  Again, that is a supposition without any real evidence. Your are claiming that all the photos taken during the making of the film were displayed on all the cinemas that projected it. Even the February 1965 premiere in Rome claimed in IMDB, a website were anyone can edit it, doesn't seem to be for the general public. Looking at the online archives, the review in Corriere della Sera is from November 27, 1965 and the one in La Stampa is from January 15, 1966, frwiki claims the release in Italy was November 25, 1965. Günther Frager (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  Where did you find these articles, precisely, please ? Do you have links to other Italian critics from the first release to strenghten your claim ? Groupir ! (talk) 07:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  Doing a simple query on you favorite search engine with point that all issues of La Stampa are available at https://archive.org/details/la-stampa-newspaper and all issues of Corriere della Sera are available at https://archivio.corriere.it/Archivio/interface/landing.html. I remind you @Groupir !: that official policy COM:EVID: In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained. Günther Frager (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  How can you have access to the content of the Corriere della Sera ?ǃ There is a paywall, we can't see if it is a review about the film or just another article about it. - Groupir ! (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

  How can you have access to the content of the Corriere della Sera ?ǃ Sorry, it is none of your business. If you don't have access, you can ask at the VP, plenty of public and private institutions have have access to it. I provided two sources, is https://archive.org censored by your regime? Where is the evidence that this particular photo was first published in Italy? I guarantee it was not on the newspaper issues I cited. Günther Frager (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

  What a diva... It's simply to check the content of this article to verify your words. I gave the evidence with that first release on February 1965. Groupir ! (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

• rather  Keep. In my opinion, it's not so much a problem of film release date, but rather demonstrating that the picture was actually taken on Italian soil. @ User:Tisourcier any opinion ? Archibald Tuttle (talk) 09:12, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Archibald Tuttle: the {{PD-Italy}} template starts with: The country of origin of this photograph is Italy and the link refers to the Berne Convention definition of country of origin. Taking a picture in Italy doesn't make Italy the country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 12:48, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  Taking a picture in Italy for an Italian movie shot there with half of the crew being Italian makes it. Groupir ! (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  Again, country of origin is determined by its first publication, not by the people surrounding the photo. And btw, who took the photo? the Italian gaffer? the Italian cook? the Italian hairdresser? the Italian cleaning personnel? because the still photographer was Victor Rodrigue who is as Italian as Nicolas Sarkozy. Günther Frager (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Günther Frager: this sounds like over-perfectionism to me! But if you're sure about legal issues, the ultimate solution (in a constructive approach) would be to ask to the copyright owner (formerly Corona, now probably Studiocanal) to officially release the image in public domain and change license accordingly. Racconish any additional advice ? Archibald Tuttle (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Glitter Ad With Twin Towers Burning.jpeg

https://film-makerscoop.com/filmmakers/luigi-cazzaniga/bio Cazzaniga was not a federal employee. Needs VRT permission. Based5290 (talk) 03:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Andrea Wildin promotional image.jpg

I am this person named within this file, I am no longer a Candidate and this file, the information contained within it, along with the image, is now more than 5 years old. ~2026-81233-4 (talk) 04:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

While the link is dead, the archive link contains the image used and uploaded in this file, and the images on the Greens party website are (unless otherwise stated) available under a CC BY-SA 2.5 license. I don't know what should be done in an instance where the person who a photo depicts wishes for the photo to be removed, but Creative Commons licenses don't have an expiry date, and this image was then and is still validly licensed, so I leave this comment to make clear that it is not a copyright violation. LivelyRatification (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

The relevant guideline in this instance, I think, would be Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. LivelyRatification (talk) 07:34, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Energy efficiency information plate in Dolyna local history museum of Tatiana and Omelan Antonovych.jpg

Derivative of the copyrighted poster, no FoP. Komarof (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep File is tagged with a template that indicates it was uploaded in partnership with the museum. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Still  Delete: @The Squirrel Conspiracy: please read the project description again: the museum you mention is the National Museum of Ethnography in Warsaw, Poland, and this poster is from the Museum of Boyko culture, Dolyna, Ukraine, whose permission is not indicated. In fact, it's unclear what this Polish museum template is doing in descriptions of photographs from Ukraine, where, unlike Poland, there is no freedom of panorama. Komarof (talk) 07:23, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

it was a joined project. More info about it is available here: [] . see also: []. This explains the connection of PL-based museum and Ukraine-based museums cooperation and Wikimedia. This was an international GLAM and Wiki (ethno) expedition project. - Lantuszka (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:EthnoCarpathians 22082017DolynaUA-74.jpg

Derivative of the copyrighted poster, no FoP. Komarof (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep File is tagged with a template that indicates it was uploaded in partnership with the museum. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Still  Delete: Read the project description again: the museum you mention is the National Museum of Ethnography in Warsaw, Poland, and this poster is from the Museum of Boyko culture, Dolyna, Ukraine, whose permission is not indicated. Komarof (talk) 07:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

it was a joined project. More info about it is available here: [] . see also: []. This explains the connection of PL-based museum and Ukraine-based museums cooperation and Wikimedia. This was an international GLAM and Wiki (ethno) expedition project. - Lantuszka (talk) 16:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Epigrafe Pallagrello di Monticello.jpg

Plaque on the left is from 2014 and there is no FoP in Italy. Abzeronow (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Maybe the plaque on the left could be cropped out... Friniate (talk) 09:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ArchdioceseofCebu.jpg

This was an older but official design copyrighted by the archdiocese. P-JR (talk) 06:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Further, indicated source is an ambiguous "scanned file." P-JR (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC) P-JR (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete 2012 design of the seal telling from its description. The seal also consists of intricate artistic designs that would not simply pass off as "simple geometrical shapes or text", hence not suited for PD-textlogo. AsianStuff03 (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

File:تاريخ_الأرقام_العربية_٣٢١.pdf

Plain text, out of project scopeǃ — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

ما سبب الحذف؟

النص يبين أهمية تاريخ الأرقام العربية ١٢٣ ومرفوع على نسخة حرة فلا أرى سبب واضح للحذف رِفْد (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@رِفْد مرحبا، النصوص الخام لا توضع على ويكيميديا كومنز — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

المقال نُشر على حساب المؤسسة في إكس (تويتر سابقا) ، وعلى منصة أريد وغيرها وهو يبحث مسألة تاريخية مهمة .

وقد ذكر في نهاية المقال المصادر والمراجع ولا يعتبر نص خام. رِفْد (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sofia Reina hosting Sin Paja 2025.jpg

Suspected copyright violation: lower-resolution version of the image has been previously published in https://www.latribuna.hn/2025/10/28/primer-episodio-de-sin-paja-invita-a-los-jovenes-a-debatir-con-respeto-y-proposito/ MKFI (talk) 09:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Piero von Colonna.png

The painting was still under copyright in Italy on 1 January 1996, so its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA. Undelete in 2036. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Himno Nacional Mexicano (instrumental).ogg

Not public domain in Mexico, as well as the US per URAA status. Absolutiva 11:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep {{PD-Mexico}}, the hymn is not copyrighted.

Tbhotch™ 01:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Portrait de Louis Charles Pineton de Chambrun.jpg

The painting was still under copyright in France on 1 January 1996 because French law applied post-mortem wartime extensions for World War II, so Jacques-Émile Blanche’s term did not expire in 1992 (1942 + 50) but several years later. Because it was protected in France on that date, its U.S. copyright was restored under the URAA and, as a work first published in 1933, it remains protected in the United States until 1 January 2029. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

TO follow up, it was still copyrighted in France on 1 Jan 1996 due to France's WWII wartime extension of 8 years and 120 days (added to the standard 50-year term). Blanche died in 1942, so copyright expired in 2001, not 1992. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Dhirghawardana.jpg

Previously used on self-promotion page on Indonesian Wikipedia, since deleted: id:Dhirgha Wardana Btrs (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:The establishment of ESST.png

Possible non free scheenshot. Low resolution, no EXIF data. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Les données EXIF ont été supprimées car j'ai envoyé la photo via une application de messagerie (WhatsApp) qui compresse les images et nettoie les métadonnées avant de l'importer ici. DINADUBOIS (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Both this and File:ESST sup (1).png appear to be AI-generated images. The original photo appears to be File:ESST ALGER.webp; notice that the street isn't quite as nice as in the generated images. Omphalographer (talk) 04:59, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Dudz Lima (talk · contribs)

None of these have exif, unlikely to be own work

• File:Aldemo Garcia 4.jpg
• File:Aldemo Garcia 3.jpg
• File:Aldemo Garcia 1.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Flintstones-June-9-1961 (8080787943).jpg

No apparent reason for why 1950sUnlimited is considered the legitimate copyright holder. Copyright formalities regarding the ad itself are irrelevant as it is based on a copyrighted property, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Copyright_formalities. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 13:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Also nominating Fliintstones-Feb-21-1961 (8080783880).jpg for the same reason. – Howardcorn33 (💬) 13:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep To me it hinges on whether this is an authorized use of the copyrighted character. To me it appears so. For the copyright holder to show that the use was not authorized, the copyright holder would send a cease and desist order to the violator, to show that they are policing unauthorized usage. For instance if the newspaper printed a notice that the previous publication was not authorized by the copyright holder. I see the image as lapsing into the public domain, even though the character does not lapse. --RAN (talk) 18:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Probably not. If it was an authorized use in the ad, and the ad is actually freely licensed by the copyright owner of the ad, then maybe (it's likely that such a license exceeds the authorization they had in the first place though). We could only use this particular character drawing, and only in the context of the ad, even then. But odds are the rest of the ad is PD through lack of renewal, and the Flickr user is no relation to the company who ran the ad in the first place. In that case most of the ad is PD, but it is still a derivative work of the character, and you need permission from the underlying copyright owner to distribute it. The company who owns the ad can always distribute it under the original authorization, but anyone else needs permission from the underlying copyright owner. For one example, the film It's a Wonderful Life was not renewed, so was shown on TV, then someone remembered they owned the copyright to the underlying book, and their permission was needed to show the film. Almost definitely a similar case here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
• They cut out one 20 minute scene as a compromise to avoid further litigation. See: https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/26/media/its-a-wonderful-life-abridged-version --RAN (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Interesting, if that section was the main one derivative of the book, it's an interesting test. Anyways, Stewart v. Abend is another example of this situation, where a derivative work becomes PD for one reason or another, but the underlying work is still under copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

     Keep per Clindberg and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) -- Ooligan (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

    That's a  Delete for me, to be clear. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

File:20161209 Multilingual sign at Plum Lotus Garden, Sun Moon Lake 日月潭梅荷園多語標誌.jpg

non-free 2D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep: content of this picture, made by the Sun Moon Lake National Scenic Area Administration, Tourism Administration, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, should not be the subject matter of copyright in accordance of Article 9, Copyright Act. Howard61313 (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:20161209 Multilingual sign at Hanbi Trail, Sun Moon Lake 日月潭涵碧步道多語標示.jpg

non-free 2D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep: content of this picture, made by the Sun Moon Lake National Scenic Area Administration, Tourism Administration, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, should not be the subject matter of copyright in accordance of Article 9, Copyright Act. Howard61313 (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

File:SDK, SDS i katolički sveštenik.png

Author unknown, Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 13:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:SDK, SDS i hodža.png

Author unknown. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 13:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:SDK u Sloveniji.png

Author unknown. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:SDS proslava slave 1943.png

Author unknown. PD-Yugoslavia does not apply without proof of government authorship or publication. Source is Facebook and does not establish copyright status. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:SDS oficir.png

Coloured image of a WWII-era photograph with unknown author. Modern colourisation is a derivative work, and the copyright status of the original photograph is not established. PD-Yugoslavia does not apply without proof of government authorship or publication. Fails COM:LIC and COM:DERIVATIVE. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:General Borivoje Jonić.png

Author unknown. Screenshot from a YouTube video does not establish copyright. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:KostaMušiciOriginal.png

Author unknown. PD-old-70 requires the author’s death date. Museum attribution does not prove public-domain. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljotic Djujic major Kapetnovic.png

Author unknown. PD-Serbia does not apply without proof of government authorship or publication. Book source does not establish public-domain status. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljotic i djujic.png

Author unknown. PD-Serbia does not apply without proof of government authorship or publication. Book source does not establish public-domain status. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljoticnaodru.png

Author unknown. PD-Serbia does not apply without proof of government authorship or publication. Book source does not establish public-domain status. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljoticprvisvetskirat.jpg

Author unknown. PD-Serbia does not apply without proof of government authorship or official publication. PD-anon-expired is not demonstrated. Book source does not establish public-domain status. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljotic1917solunskifront.png

Author unknown. PD-Serbia does not apply without proof of government authorship or official publication. PD-anon-expired is not demonstrated. Book source does not establish public-domain status. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljoticnasahranimilosa2.png

Author unknown. Private archive source does not establish copyright status. PD-Serbia and PD-US do not apply. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljoticnasahranimilosapng.png

Author unknown. Private archive source does not establish copyright status. PD-Serbia and PD-US do not apply. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ljoticnasahranimilosapng.png

Author unknown. Private archive source does not establish copyright status. PD-Serbia and PD-US do not apply. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sdk i hodza.png

Author unknown. Screenshot from a documentary film does not establish copyright status of the underlying WWII-era footage. PD-anon-70-EU is not demonstrated. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Ministar Dimitrije Ljotić.png

Modern colourisation of a historical portrait. The copyright status of the original photograph is not established, and the uploader does not hold rights to the underlying work. PD-Art and PD-old-70 are not demonstrated. Public-domain licence cannot be verified. Fails COM:LIC. Rajendra Alben (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Beniamino VIII.jpg

caricamento erroneo CenturioZ (talk) 14:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Vandenbeld in Parliament.jpg

Screenshot from a House of Commons video feed, not own work of uploader. Copyright either belongs to CPAC; the main distributor for the House of Commons live/video feed - or the House of Commons of Canada. Both retain their Copyright; https://www.cpac.ca/terms-of-use / https://www.ourcommons.ca/en/important-notices PascalHD (talk) 16:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sterling Biotech Logo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Logo PD-textlogo, but may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:YLC Bilingual Wordmark RW.png

Copyright status uncertain; requesting deletion to comply with Commons licensing requirements VMIRoy (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Vote Vancouver V Hand.png

Copyright status uncertain; requesting deletion to comply with Commons licensing requirements VMIRoy (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Vote Vancouver Logo Yellow.png

Copyright status uncertain; requesting deletion to comply with Commons licensing requirements VMIRoy (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. Definitely below COM:TOO Canada. Nothing but text. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:17, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Spiritualita kmenů.jpg

 Delete Out of scope Gampe (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Kentucky license plate, 1988-1997.png

Derivative work of The Soul of a Horse by German photographer and Stern magazine staffer Peter Thomann, according to

Also included in this nomination: File:Kentucky sample license plate, 1988-1997.png — Fourthords | =Λ= | 18:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Prešeren's crush (13044857733).jpg

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: modern sculpture, not de minimis (given the image title and description). TadejM ^(t/p) 18:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep deminimi, title and description can easely be changed Lukas Beck (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't think this would help. See Commons:De minimis: "if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement [...] If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided." --TadejM ^(t/p) 21:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Leena Simonen.jpg

For privacy reasons. ~2026-83154-0 (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:MTV OMG logo.svg

This logo is non-free in its home country United Kingdom. Previous file was deleted but was reuploaded again in SVG format. LDM2003 (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep. The underlying company is from the US, so I question whether this is a UK work. Also, UK threshold of originality has changed recently and this seems likely to fall below it now. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Jesús Ángel Simal Lozano (talk · contribs)

Out of scope, potential copyvio: all of these PDFs contain unattributed images and often include screenshots of non-free content like Google Maps.

If you can supply freely licensed images of the pieces of artwork you are cataloging here, please upload those images to Commons directly - you can attach additional information to those images, like their locations, in the Commons file pages.

• File:Documento de referencia — Escudo del Arzobispo Don Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada en el Relicario de San Clemente Papa (1594).pdf
• File:Ficha Nº 12 – Escudo del Arzobispo Don Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada en la capa del Relicario de San Clemente Papa (1594).pdf
• File:Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada – Fundación del Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes y sus Escudos (PDF)Escudos en Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes y en la Fuente de Sanclemente-fundacion.pdf
• File:Mapa con la ubicación de los 18 Escudos del Arzobispo de Santiago Mons. Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada.pdf
• File:📑Ficha N 3- 8 QR-escudos patio.pdf
• File:Proposta de Corrección Toponímica do Colexio de Sanclemente de Pasantes e da Rúa do Arcebispo Sanclemente (CT135B, 2025).pdf
• File:VIDA-D~1.pdf
• File:Variantes de los 18 escudos del Arzobispo de Santiago-Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada.pdf
• File:Ruta Heráldica del Arzobispo Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada. Reseña gráfica.pdf
• File:El Arzobispo Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada – Documento CT135B (PDF).pdf
• File:Escudo de Sanclemente y Torquemada en el dintel de la entrada al Museo (antigua Sala Capitular) desde el Claustro de la Catedral de Santiago (Ficha N.º 11).pdf
• File:Escudo de Sanclemente y Torquemada sobre la puerta lateral de la Antigua Casa de los Ejercitantes (Compañía de Jesús), en la Rúa da Ensinanza 16 (Ficha N.º 10).pdf
• File:Escudos monumentales de Sanclemente y Torquemada y de Fray Antonio Monroy e Híjar en el patio interior del Convento de Nosa Señora dos Remedios (Ficha N.º 9).pdf
• File:Escudos de Sanclemente y de Fray Antonio Monroy sobre la puerta del Convento de Nosa Señora dos Remedios (Ficha N.º 8).pdf
• File:Iglesia das Orfas (Huérfanas) en Santiago de Compostela (Ficha N.º 7).pdf
• File:Fuente de Sanclemente situada fuera del Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes (Ficha N.º 6)Fuente de Sanclemente situada fuera del Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes (Ficha N.º 6).pdf
• File:Escudo del Arzobispo Sanclemente y Torquemada sobre el portalón exterior inutilizado del Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes (Ficha N.º 5)📑 Ficha N 5 -portalon-12 escudos escudo del Obispo de Don Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada.pdf
• File:Escudo n.º 11 en la parte posterior noroeste del Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes (Ficha N.º 4).pdf
• File:Escudos arzobispales en el patio del Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes (Ficha N.º 3).pdf
• File:Escudo sin símbolos arzobispales en el Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes (Ficha N.º 1 bis).pdf
• File:Ficha N.º 1 – Escudo del Arzobispo Don Juan de Sanclemente y Torquemada (Colegio de Sanclemente de Pasantes).pdf

Omphalographer (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

He revisado detenidamente todas las fichas de esta colección.

Las únicas dos que contenían imágenes no libres eran la nº 10 y la nº 12, y ya han sido corregidas y sustituidas por versiones completamente propias.

El resto de las fichas contienen únicamente fotografías realizadas por mí, y todas están publicadas con licencia CC‑BY‑SA 4.0.

Los enlaces a Google Maps que aparecen en algunas fichas son solo texto, no capturas ni imágenes derivadas.

Con estas correcciones, todas las fichas cumplen las políticas de Wikimedia Commons. Jesús Ángel Simal Lozano (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Jesús Ángel Simal Lozano (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: additional similar documents. "Map interactivo" consists primarily of a QR code link to Google Maps; if this is relevant to an encyclopedia article or other educational content, use a hyperlink in the text of the page, not a PDF of a QR code.

• File:Mapa interactivo de los leguarios del Camino Real N-550 (QR).pdf
• File:Ficha Nº 1 escudo puerta de entrada-antiguo -colegio de pasantes-y-comparativa con 1 bis.pdf

Omphalographer (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Fallback-image-148~ v-varl 92940a.jpg

Maybe this is copyrightable, let's discuss. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment, the logo itself isn't the problem. It's just simple text. I think the background is the issue. That could potentially be solved by vectorizing it, using only the text. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 23:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Project 20260206 1500479-01.png

Duplicate PeterPFar (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2012-P1030784.jpg

motivado por engano do proprietário do ficheiro Ms Belo (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2012-P1030781.jpg

motivado por engano no carregamento do proprietário do ficheiro Ms Belo (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2014-3032.jpg

motivado por engano do proprietário do ficheiro Ms Belo (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2014-3027.jpg

motivado por engano do proprietário do ficheiro no carregamento do mesmo Ms Belo (talk) 23:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Canal 24 Honduras.jpg

Buenas tardes se está pidiendo de favor la eliminación de este articulo ya que es de mi propiedad y fue subido sin autorización... les pedimos de favor ayuda con eliminación de este artículo ya que pertenece a Diario C24 Honduras Torresierravalle34 (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

se solicita urgente borrar ese artículo ya que se robaron la imagen Manuelenriqueh (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

soltamos eliminar este archivo pertenece exclusivamente a Diario C24 Honduras y si no es bajado se procedera a una demanda pornderechos de autor Manuelenriqueh (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

se solicita amablemente que se proceda a borrar este artículo ya que no fue subido por la empresa aquien corresponde y tiene información mal intensionada la cual esta perjudicando a la marca y empresa, si este archivo no es borrado se procedera a una demanda por robo de imagen información falsa y por robo de derechos de autor, de ante mano gracias y esperamos lo pronto posible este archivo este borrado y evitar demandas Manuelenriqueh (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

 Speedy keep YOU CANT HAVE TOO MUCH Adygea9191 (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

se solicita urgente borrar ese artículo ya que se robaron la imagen ~2026-13675-60 (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please delete this article urgently as the image was stolen, OHHHHH Altai122222222222 (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment the logo looks to me to be probably simple enough to be in the public domain in both Honduras and the U.S., so I find the accusation that the image (and an unnamed article) were stolen from you rather absurd. Further, he remark that the (unspecified) article should be deleted because no fue subido por la empresa aquien [sic] corresponde amounts to a statement that we should only host content that has a conflict of interest. - Jmabel ! talk 07:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

• Trato de explicar en español también, porque es posible que el nominador no lee inglés. Y favor de desculpir mi español de extranjero.

La llave del asunto es un concepto que creo que se llama en español "el umbral de originalidad." Si un logotipo es bastante simple, no existen derechos de autor. El logotipo ya puede haber los derechos de una marca registrada (como indique explicitamente la página del archivo este) sin haber este otro modo de derechos. Cuando alguién reproduje una marca registrada, se requiere indicarlo con ™ o ®, y no se permite usarla en una manera confusante acerca de la propriedad de la marca, pero se puede reprodujerla en conformidad con estas reglas.

El logotipo este está muy cerca del umbral; lo que determinaré el case estará un determinació en qué lado esté ubicado. - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

I sense that this is a continuation of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Carlosarevalohn, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canal 24 Honduras es un medio de comunicacion de Televisión y digital.jpg and the new involved users' contributions. Nakonana (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

See also AN archive: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 103#h-Repeated deletion nominations without a reason by two recently-created users-20260112111800. Nakonana (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Further somewhat weird edits on the page by nearly new User:Jairojimenez6; obviously wants it deleted, obviously has no sense of Commons' process; these edits at least border on vandalism. - Jmabel ! talk 18:58, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Similar questionable edits at File:Canal 24 Honduras es un medio de comunicacion de Televisión y digital.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 19:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Maybe the files related to Canal 24 Honduras should just be deleted because it might be out of scope. I can't find anything on the channel outside of Facebook. Nakonana (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

@Nakonana: https://diarioc24honduras.com/. Offhand, looks legit. - Jmabel ! talk 04:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I see Google search failed me on this one, thanks for checking. Nakonana (talk) 12:23, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2014-3034.jpg

motivado por engano no carregamento do ficheiro por parte do proprietário do mesmo Ms Belo (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2014-3031.jpg

motivado por engano no carregamento do ficheiro Ms Belo (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant2012-1142.jpg

motivado por engano no carregamento do ficheiro, por parte do proprietário do mesmo Ms Belo (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Sant-2012-P1030778.jpg

motivado por engano no carregamento do ficheiro Ms Belo (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Mapamundi-antiguo-mundo-dibujado-Puerto 1438066831 117144650 667x375.jpg

Propose redirect to File:1500 map by Juan de la Cosa-North up.jpg; this is basically a scaled-down version, and any differences are just flaws. Jmabel ! talk 23:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Nipple play and male orgasm.webm

COM:PORN, unused and not meaningfully different from other files by the same author Dronebogus (talk) 12:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Even though I closed the discussion as kept, but because of @Dronebogus' appeal, I cancelled my decision. Kadı Message 09:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porno.webm#Dabmasterars keep. Not going to repeat myself. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 19:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)