File:Karte HFH Pflegemanagement.jpg

Die Bild-Datei ist nicht mehr aktuell und enthält daher Informationen, die nicht mehr zutreffen. HFH-Onlinekommunikation (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

This DR was created by the uploader a username that matches the author (whether they are the author I can't verify), they say the information is outdated. That's not a reason for deletion if I remember correctly. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:JanetJacksonHighlandDec292025(cropped).jpg

no meaningful exif, unlikely to own work of new user Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Camera model: Sony RX100VII Date Taken: 12-29-2025

Photo of Ticket added.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritchkraft (talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Files in Category:Bernard Natan

copyright appears to be eligible for uraa restoration as per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France.

• File:Le Juif et le cinéma.jpg

RoyZuo (talk) 12:52, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Ce fichier est utilisé dans l'article Bernard Natan dans sa bio pour illustrer les persécutions auxquelles il été soumis avant d'être déporté et exterminé

Avec le paragraphe suivant:

"En septembre 1941, l’exposition de propagande antisémite « Le Juif et la France », à l’initiative des occupants allemands et de l’Institut d’études juives, « dénonce la domination du secteur du cinéma par les Juifs » ; la photo de Bernard Natan y figure".

File:Hou minghao.jpg

Copyvio from https://weibo.com/5763552342/Q3ESFfsth (8th picture). NoCringe (talk) 13:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:2016Salvador-Bahia-by ari candido16 1159.jpg

Aufnahme von sehr niedriger Qualität, die nicht zum Projekt beiträgt. Cuello de pepino (talk) 13:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Bhargava Bharath - Author.jpg

Uploaded by mistake / not useful for Wikimedia Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlakeWright02 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Unterbringungsquote vs. Studierendenanteil.png

Unterbringungsquote vs. Studierendenanteil Dilarakaplankacmaz (talk) 14:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 Delete. No clue what the reason for the deletion request is supposed to be since it's just a copy of the file name, but the deletion request was started by the uploader shortly after upload, so... courtesy deletion. Nakonana (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Freezer Fresh P9040197.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Tentative  Keep. It seems very likely that the artwork here dates from the era when copyright in the U.S. still required going through the formalities, and would have been unlikely for a piece like this. Picture was taken only 15 years into the era where copyright became automatic. I think the presumption here would be on the side of {{PD-US-1978-89}} (if not {{PD-US-no notice}}, if it's even older) for the artwork. - Jmabel ! talk 19:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep I agree with Jmabel. This license {{PD-US-no notice}} would apply to this old coke advertising featuring a bell boy. -- Ooligan (talk) 23:03, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sicista subtilis, southern birch mouse.jpg

The source page indicates that this image can only be used for non-commercial purposes. https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id20714/ Reconrabbit (talk) 15:47, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ماهان زارعی.jpg

عکس بدون رضایت شخص قرار داده شده است Mahanzareii (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Akronym deutsche Gesellschaft für Toxikologie (GT).png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

This is not a logo, but an acronym. We use it in addition to the logo on our websites, letters, posters and certificates. And it is in use for this since over 20 years. It is indeed the very branding of the Germ Toxicology (hence gt) society. ~2026-72825-9 (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Apparently some kind of wordmark of the de:Deutsche Gesellschaft für Toxikologie, so I think it is in scope. --Rosenzweig τ 10:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Banner.webp

misattributed poor quality flag using a previous file from File:Dragon flag used by Du Wenxiu.svg ; this is not the flag of the taiping NorthTension (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:BFM TV journalist after Macron speech in Tokyo 01.jpg

cette photo est une photo privée et pas libre de droits ~2026-71518-8 (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Not sure what you mean, can you link to a particular policy? I took this picture. It shows a public figure. Syced (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ДАЖО 1 77 1989а.pdf

duplicate of c:File:ДАЖО 1-77-1989а. 1917. Метричні книги православних церков Сквирського повіту. Села на В.pdf Madvin (talk) 18:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ДАЖО 1 77 1993а.pdf

duplicate of c:File:ДАЖО 1-77-1993а. 1917. Метричні книги православних церков Сквирського повіту Київської губернії. Села Г-З.pdf Madvin (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ДАЖО 1 77 1993б.pdf

duplicate of c:File:ДАЖО 1-77-1993б. 1917. Метричні книги православних церков Сквирського повіту Київської губернії. Села на К.pdf Madvin (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Christian Figueroa Official Portrait.jpg

The photo is claimed to have been created on 11 May 2023 and was uploaded 23 August 2023.

But it exists in April of 2023? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:59, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Can I just say: wow I was so confused by this. When I used Google Lens to find prior publications, the AI overview said "The image is a professional headshot with an American flag in the background."

The description says: "Christian Figueroa poses for an official portrait after he was appointed to his position as National Membership Director at the College Democrats of America."

But the AI said "professional", and it first glance you may confuse this with a professional portrait of someone in the US government. Portrait, American flag in the background with some bokeh, the works. But this man works for the College Democrats of America, not the government.

And it's so bad. His mouth is forced open, showing his teeth - any half-professional photographer worth their salt would have told them to close it. Especially when someone has overlapping teeth. But the most egregious thing is the flash. His face is a disco ball due to moisturizer that the photographer flashed straight into. What kind of miserable photographer did this?

But THEN you look even closelier. White spots. White spots everywhere. The camera sensor has dead pixels. Loads of dead pixels. This isn't a professional camera. (not on earth anyway) And check his mouth again: there's a line. Not sure if that's a sensor defect of what, but a professional camera wouldn't do that.

But THEN you notice the background - there are no dead pixels there. But that's impossible!!

When FINALLY you notice the edges - whoever took this photo couldn't afford a real photographer, or a real camera, or a real American flag. And Google's AI thought this was professional.

Thank you for listening to amateur hour with Alexis Jazz. Tune in next week for more ramblings. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:1FARM DOW-1998 SPENCER SOUTH DAKOTA.jpg

Two points: (1) The author is not "Flexible Array of Radars and Mesonets (FARM) / National Weather Service (NWS)" (as claimed currently in the file), but rather Joshua Wurman and Curtis R. Alexander, neither of which worked for the NWS at the time. Both worked for the Center for Severe Weather Research, with Alexander jointly also working for the University of Oklahoma. No evidence to suggest the U.S. Federal Government has any claim to copyright (or PD-USGov lack thereof). The image was also published by the American Meteorological Society, who directly asserts they own a copyright ("© 2005 American Meteorological Society" on the overall publication (not image specific though). (2) The background almost looks to be hand drawn? Even if it isn't, it seems complex enough to surpass the threshold of originality per Commons:Threshold of originality#Maps. Noting for others the actual damage polygons (color outlines) do originate from the U.S. federal government (i.e. they are public records/facts).
For both of those reasons, I think this might just be enough above the threshold or originality for this to be copyrighted. It is a borderline case though. Hoping others give their thoughts. WeatherWriter (talk) 19:05, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Chronicle of Georgia.jpg

no freedom of panorama in Georgia Kuhni74 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

When deleting, please add Undelete in category. –LPfi (talk) 07:51, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Redaktsiin-bodlogo-1.jpg

• File:Redaktsiin-bodlogo-2.jpg
• File:Redaktsiin-bodlogo.jpg

Plain text as a set of images (editorial policy of a local newspaper); outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a group of JPGs on Commons. In addition, the text is a potentially copyrighted. Marbletan (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:BDO Andal monitored EF fillup work at helpdesk of 278 Raniganj AC under Paschim Bardhaman district, West Bengal.jpg

Not sure if the license is valid. Is the CEO West Bengal a State or Federal position? Yann (talk) 19:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

@Yann, for additional context CEO West Bengal is an All Rights Reserved website. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 20:24, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Siam National Football Team Pioneers (Thailand) 1916.png

Request file deletion at uploader's request. It has been superseded by a higher quality image: Siam National Football Team (Thailand) Pioneers 1915.png -Artanisen (talk) 14:51, 2 February 2026 (UTC)