File:Test.svg

The file lacks valid license, and it's unclear if any of the revisions are licensed as PD or not _→AzaToth 00:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Clearly speedy keep. This is a testing ground for SVG, none of the files uploaded here are permanent. Fry1989 ^eh? 00:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

They are in the revision history, thus they are permanent. _→AzaToth 00:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

See below. I told you they weren't permanent. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

• Well, yes, ... taken strictly this file is unlicensed. All revisions are probably pd or some free license (but author/src usually not mentioned). We should have a admin bot delete the file revisions every day ;) --Saibo (Δ) 00:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

The problems making svg-files for wikimedia commons and other wikis are enormous. Not every svg-file can be uploaded to wikimedia because of the specific requirements that the wiki-pages demands. I cannot tell how much time I have spent trying to figure out why the file that looked good in Inkscape looked so bad on Wikimedia. Until somone pointed out the page that we are talking about. The page is an indispensable tool for making good svg-files for wikimedia. For more information see a previous post that I have pasted on my own talkpage: Important Note. Citypeek (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Most problems can be detected with Commons:SVG Check (be sure to also enable the error check) - but it resembles not all problems MediaWiki has with SVGs. w3 validator should also be used. Anyway, we need a real test area - somehow - since the other tools are not sufficient. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 12:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I would challenge if it's really most problems. A lot of the font problems only become visible with scaling (thumbs), which is not supported in the tool. Yes, we want/need a realistic testing ground and I am sure nobody would object if old revisions (and actual files) got deleted after a week or so. (Which is actually the advantage of having one testing ground for everything and not a lot of them spread all over the place) Iridos (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

As I just see now, the first version of this file is from August this year, so obviously it already is periodically deleted, so nothing is permanent in the revision history. Perhaps someone involved in the technical side of those deletions would like to comment (and I guess then we can close this request) Iridos (talk) 15:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Kept: It obviously serves an important purpose, and time is needed to figure out the technical side. In the meantime, there is no need to keep this nomination open. However, the grounds of nomination are valid -- it's not clear to what extent all the images in the revision history are released into the public domain (I also suspect many of these tests were ultimately uploaded under a free license, not as PD, which raises another problem). There is surely a technical solution, other than relying on someone with spare time occasionally manually deleting some of the backlog in the revision history, to address the issues raised in this nomination. As Saibo suggests, it would be great if a bot could regularly delete the revision history. I think it goes without saying that this keep is without prejudice to a future nomination for deletion, if a solution is not implemented. Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I tried to clean up a bit: Deletion caused an deletion error but did work apparently. What not worked: the restore of the page versions - anyway - not really needed. If someone needs ask me. ;) Probably due to the many versions. Maybe we should switch to a new name. ;) I did the same to File:Testfile.svg now. Strange: although it had far less versions it still has shown a deletion error (all gone anyway) --Saibo (Δ) 00:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Test.svg

Following versions I uploaded, must be deleted due to not naming authors/source: (Copyright)

• 19:10, 17. Dez. 2017  Done
• 21:08, 14. Nov. 2017  Not done only a red rectangle
• 12:12, 22. Okt. 2017 OK is correct named in upload comment File:StrekenProvincieUtrecht1.svg

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

By the way, look at Media with unacceptable data in old versions – there are two images with copyrighted fonts in old revisions. A volunteer sysop to finalize the purge of Adobe stuff? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hey JoKalliauer, I deleted only the first file, because due a bug this file can't fully deleted anymore. (Maybe now with some other method as the regular.) -- User: Perhelion 14:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@Perhelion: Thanks. In my opinion StrekenProvincieUtrecht1_soso does not agree with Cc-by, there should be at least a link to the filedescriptionpage File:StrekenProvincieUtrecht1.svg, or naming the autors. I neither linked it correctly, nor named the autor. But I'm shure User:Glrx won't charge me, that I didn't cited him correctly on File:Test.svg. Therefore resolved in my opinion.

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@Perhelion: I deleted the deletionrequest on File:Test.svg. (I hope it is ok according to the rules.)  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Closet: Requestor withdrawn @JoKalliauer it is ok. -- User: Perhelion 23:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Test.svg

Kill test hahahahahahahaha! B3nd4i Vi3tbi0 (talk) 12:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)