Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Xocolatl

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Xocolatl}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Xocolatl

Rationale, discussion and results

Reason: See also de:Wikipedia:Checkuser/Anfragen/Xocolatl, Tuschmuschel, Cluas fhada, Established 1620, Plüschhai. The users are accused of violating the UCoC 3.1 for harassing other users on dewiki. There are clear similarities in their behavior, and the accounts are active in blocks of time. They often only work in conflicts simultaneously. Here on Commons, it's noticeable that the accounts deal with Flickr imports, recategorizations, and the British Isles. --NDG (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please provide examples of misuse at Commons. Krd 15:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
If the enforcement of the UCoC isn't a global issue, then I'd have to look into it. Unwanted co-editing doesn't seem to be a problem here? 3 Accounts of 5 are just per dewiki CU confirmed. NDG (talk) 06:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Plüschhai and Tuschmuschel are Stale. Cluas fhada and Established 1620 show a very limited amount of data. Based on those data the connection between them and Xocolatl is Inconclusive. --Lymantria (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you very much! NDG (talk) 14:59, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.