Copyright status: File:Fe2(CO)9yesFeFe.png

Copyright status: File:Fe2(CO)9yesFeFe.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fe2(CO)9yesFeFe.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Vial with triethylmethyl ammonium chloride horizontal.png

Hi, DMacks

This file is used in the English Wikipedia page Triethylmethylammonium trichloride. It is yellow liquid when forming the polychloride, as written in the article. Is there a typo in the file name?

Regards,

Leiem (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Good catch! It does appear to be a mistake in the filename (of both this derivative-image and the original image). Do you have the permission-flag to fix it? I can deal with it later today/tonight if it needs any admin tools. DMacks (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

I have requested file renaming. --Leiem (talk) 06:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

And it's been done. I adjusted the files' description text likewise. DMacks (talk) 12:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! --Leiem (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Amurensine image deletion

Hello Passionate Wikipedia User,

I appreciate your proof checking my diagram of Amurensine and finding the errors that I was unaware of. What I would prefer in the future is if you see an error in one of my images, to request a corrected version be uploaded. I am now going to correct the mistake, make a new WikiCommons image, and re-upload it. Also, since the deletion, the page has been without 3D structure image, which detracts from the user experience. Both in terms of operational smoothness in collaboration and avoiding administrative inefficiencies, a request for correction that is actioned through an updated version is preferable to deletion of content with errors.

Thank you for your contributions and your patience in granting my requests audience.

Cheers,

Marco (Planine) Troiani Mplanine (talk) 21:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Marco,

I agree that fixes, especially simple ones, are useful, and that it's important that uploaders are given a heads-up about problems prior to deletion. I disagree that "having a 3D image in an article" is worthwhile if the image is factually flawed, so I think it's better to remove a mistake from an article until a correct one becomes available (easy enough to re-add).

For this specific situation, I was only acting on the nomination by someone else. As part of the nomination, a note was left on your talkpage that an image of yours was up for deletion, and with a link to the nomination where the problem was mentioned. If it were to have been fixed within that week+, I would have put the deletion on hold and asked the nominator to re-evaluate it. DMacks (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Iranian political posters

Category : Poster of Lying media 

The content in question does not intend to sabotage or threaten or attack, and G3's reason does not include its content. This content is related to Iranian political posters made by famous artists. If you don't know about the politics in Iran, avoid deleting the desired content. Wikipedia bureaucrats are expected to be careful in choosing administrators. Please restore the desired category and content Safdhberbh (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

• Category:Poster of Lying media

The content appears to violate the licensing terms of the source website. That has nothing to do with what the content itself. No matter how famous someone might be, their work is their own by default. Were these posters actually first published at least 30 years ago? The category name is needlessly biased/inflammatory, assuming "lying" is the simple word that means "not telling the truth". With no content (all images in it failed license review), that itself is enough reason to delete the category. With a poorly chosen name, that's a separate problem. DMacks (talk) 08:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Each country's copyright and ownership laws are unique and different from other countries. By the way, you are not the manager of Farsi language, how can you manage or apply the law about the laws or their violation? It seems that you are not familiar with the term limits! If you were to enter the content of users of other countries and other live and official languages, you would not violate the rules of Wikipedia.

Some of the details in these posters are from 30 years ago and were artistically combined with other works. The name of the category in my country is completely correct according to the Islamic Penal Code, and the content of this category, which includes political posters, refers to the media that are dealing with the crimes of these lying media in international courts. It is better that you do not enter into this matter so that your account will not be sued in international courts. You removed the category too soon and did not allow the permission to be added and completed in detail in the content description.

Please be more careful in the refinements and return the deleted categories and subcategories and contents. Safdhberbh (talk) 09:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

I do not respond to legal threats. Have a nice day. DMacks (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Do not apply the law in categories that are not related to your country of residence. Safdhberbh (talk) 10:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

I do not respond to users who make legal threats. You are not welcome on my talkpage. DMacks (talk) 10:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Removal of Help Desk question

Hi, in this edit you removed my unresolved/unanswered Help Desk question "Categorisation of locations" that was only just four days old. I think this is too soon. ITookSomePhotos (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes, something weird happened in my browser. I had already fixed it (Commons:Help desk#Categorisation of locations is right back where it had been). Sorry about the transient mess! DMacks (talk) 18:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

OK, thanks. ITookSomePhotos (talk) 08:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Wrong reason(s)?

Regarding your deletion of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Screenshot_Photoshop_2022_auf_MacOS.png

The reason given for deletion was F3. Derivative work of non-free content. The sample image used is free (and regarding the license tags refer to the discussion) and using a Photoshop screenshot is possible. Your reason could only apply to, let's say, if I'd used a screenhot of a getty image or maybe even the Photoshop splash screen which usually includes an artwork. Please revert the deletion and keep it up for discussion – or start deleting all of the screenshots floating around commons. Affegass (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you not see I already un-deleted it an merged a discussion of it into the other one where you commented? DMacks (talk) 10:18, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, it was a bad case of editing simultaneously. I just got the notification and I wasn't aware of your answer while I was typing here. Would be much easier if the system could alert faster or give a hint at one's online status. My bad! Sorry sorry sorry Affegass (talk) 10:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

No worries at all. Things here "sort of, usually, eventually" work. DMacks (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

a3cb1 again

Good morning mr. @DMacks. I would like to inform you that a3cb1 has been reincarnated in Eniedgrad. I'm reviewing that the files he/she is uploading are PD both in the source country and the US and, if I find a copyvio, I would inform you. Greetings. 83.61.243.178 11:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

I nominated one of its files to revision, because it was probably still copyrighted. 83.61.243.178 12:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Indef'ed. Thanks for helping to keep track of this. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks to you DMacks. Greetings. 83.61.243.178 17:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@DMacks: Now Eniedgrad is writting me anonimously asking me to not review his/her files (calling it "spying"). It's possible also to block this IP?. 83.61.243.178 00:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

@DMacks: Now this user had been created a new account: Bikeguy12. Please block him and delete all the uploads. 83.61.243.178 12:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

What is "UPE" and "CU"?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=333317510 Jmabel ! talk 00:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

en:WP:UPE is "undisclosed paid editing", a behavior that is strictly against Terms of Service on all wikimedia sites. en:WP:CU is "checkuser", a tool a few functionaries on various wikipedias can use to find out certain technical details of accounts and IPs. Dealing with this particular pool of abusing accounts took a bunch of coordinated digging by several admins and functionaries on multiple sites, so I'd rather not discuss too many of the specicics on-wiki, but feel free to email me if you'd like. Obviously general ideas of the tools and policies are fine for public discussion, as are initial notice if you have substantive concerns about my actions themselves. DMacks (talk) 17:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hair 1

The copyright for this File:Hair 1.jpg and this File:Hair 2.png photo belongs to me because I took the photo. The copyright in the photo belongs to the photographer, not to the person in the photo. By osipov (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi By osipov. Thanks for the explanation. I have revived those two images and started a discussion with an explanation of what the situation seems to be and how you can procede. DMacks (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Le Petit Parisien - UNE JOURNÉE DANS LES RUINES DE SMYRNE - 28.09.1922.png

Hello DMacks how can I make sure that an image not violating the copyright. As the source is from a Newspaper and I have given the source and the author of the article. Moreover it is already a content that is 100 years old. I look forward to your help. Utku Öziz (talk) 09:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Utku Öziz. The fact that author fr:Georges Vitoux died in 1933 is more significant than the age of the article itself. The main public domain in France seems to be "70+ years after author's death". The concern that originally came to my attenion was that the newspaper isn't published by you originally so you cannot claim to hold copyright on this scan of it. Thanks for letting me know the details so I could look more deeply. I have un-deleted it and updated the license tag. DMacks (talk) 06:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello @DMacks I also thank you very much for your concern! I am a bit new in Commons and copyright laws. Also When I publish a picture it automatically says that it is own work. I change them usually after thus I might cause a misunderstanding very sorry about that. I might also ask more questions to you about these topics! I look forward to your help! Do we have like Wikipedia 101 or Wikipedia Commons 101 videos? I will also publish some newspapers in other languages. I look forward to your help in that too! However some Newspapers have parts that we do not know who the authors are. Also, there are some cases where we know the author but we do not know their date of death etc. So for topics like this. Have a great day! Utku Öziz (talk) 10:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Possible block evasion?

Hello DMacks, I would like to inform you that there is a new user whose contributions are similar to that made by the LTA user a3cb1 and their sockpuppets. Please consider to review those contributions to confrim this and, if it is possible, to block them as soon as possible. Thank you and greetings. 193.146.182.120 11:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Tết trồng cây.jpg

Hello DMacks, I saw that you deleted the file File:Tết trồng cây.jpg on Wiki Media because of "copyright violation", however, the regarded photo was taken 60+ years ago as a set of photos by a government agency in Vietnam, and I believe that it is fully in public domain since the set of photos was published by the government for public usage. The institution you quoted is also not the copyright owner. Could you restore the photo? Faragona (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional information. I restored it and sent it to a regular deletion-request discussion, where I copied your above comment. You're welcome to add more there, and others might also have thoughts. DMacks (talk) 16:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

User:BoulevardBowl27

Not sure why you indef-blocked User:BoulevardBowl27. I'd given then a warning, and if I'd blocked it probably would have been for a week or two. They seem to do quite a bit of good work nominating pictures for deletion that, indeed, ought to be deleted. They recently made a few disruptive edits; I warned them to stop; I don't see any continuation of disruptive edits after warning. - Jmabel ! talk 18:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

is DR-nom of a page that was already tagged for speedy for the same reason. "Warned not to do that, apologized. Did it multiple times again, warned again, apologized. Did it again, blocked." Based on their edits to their user-talk subsequent to the block, I am confident that your assessment of "troll" is too generous, and that an indef is the correct response. DMacks (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Some help

Hey, I pinged you over on my talk page about some questions related to the FOP policy, but just in case you may have missed it I thought I would notice you about it on your talk page.

Aside from that question, I was also wondering if you would be able to help me with my courtesy deletion request of these two files. I've detailed the reasons why I'm requesting a courtesy deletion on the deletion request discussions that I've linked. I wont provide a huge chunk of text as to why I believe it checks out the criteria over at Commons:Courtesy deletions (unless that'd help), but I do indeed it clears that criteria even if imperfectly. In any case, thank you in advance for any help you may be able to provide. Soulbust (talk) 09:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Methoxyethanol.png

Hello DMacks, could you add your opinion to this deletion request? Thanks in advance, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Acetyl co-A wpmp.png

File:Acetyl co-A wpmp.png has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Acetyl co-A wpmp.png This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 09:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:D-Erythronolactone.png

Hello DMacks, could you add your opinion to this deletion request? Thanks in advance, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Kanada (Philosopher)

a user named maghadahistorian had continuously vandalising the English Wikipedia article of kanada(philosopher) adding that he knew about Newton's law centuries before Newton and he is vandalising other users edit.Since I am not a regular user of English Wikipedia I just added on your commons page. Michael dino oni (talk) 12:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Michael dino oni,

Thank you for letting me know. As you have seen, several editors have undone this edit. One even wrote about it on the article talk page. And now maghadahistorian has been blocked indefinitely for disruption by another admin. DMacks (talk) 06:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Rishi Kanada on Gurutvaakarshan.jpg

The file of Rishi kanada doesn't even belong to the original version of vaiseika sutra but a third source version. 106.217.42.92 06:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Thomas College

I'm confused by the deletion rationale at File:Thomas College drone 2023.jpg. What artwork does it incorporate? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Similar question for File:Official Thomas College logo 2023.png. I would think that particular logo comes under the heading of too-simple-to-copyright anyway, right? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

The school's social-media and website contain several videos, from this appears to be a frame extract. Looking back at the logo, I agree it is below TOO. Do you think it should be left as self/CC0, or retagged as PD-text? DMacks (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm leaning toward PD-text. And if you check the file metadata for the drone shot, it's consistent with a still image taken from a done, as specified. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't doubt that it is "a drone shot". But from dealing with this uploader, they do not seem to recognize that they might not have authority to license-release on behalf of their employer. I did not know that detail fully at the time I originally tagged it. But given their subsequent silence regarding employer-permission, it could just as well go down as no-permission/go-to-VRT. DMacks (talk) 04:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Bonjour

What I would amour right now is some fried chicken.-Homme affamé (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

File:4-Aminobutyramide.png

Hi DMacks. It looks like there is an inconsistency between the file name and chemical structure in this image you recently uploaded (carboxylic acid vs amide). Can you have a look? Regards, Marbletan (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Ooooops, fixed. Thanks for catching that! DMacks (talk) 13:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Eflapegrastim

I noticed that you uploaded a chemical structure image for eflapegrastim. However, I don't think it's correct. Eflapegrastim seems to be a complex protein, not a small molecule as depicted in your image. The Drugbank database, for example, describes eflapegrastim as "a form of recombinant human G-CSF comprising a human G-CSF analog coupled to the Fc fragment of human IgG4 via a polyethylene glycol linker" (https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB15001). Innerstream (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

@Innerstream: That's from the SMILES on Wikidata (and same as InChI key) for eflapegrastim (Q30314101) (see also eflapegrastim (Q76801920)), which has the correct CASNo. But looking at the drug refs, this is clearly wrong. SciFinder has no structure for the name, and no entry for that structure I drew. Easy enough for me to nuke the image. What is to be done with wikidata? DMacks (talk) 01:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. It looks like incorrect data got attached to the Wikidata item for eflapegrastim. I don't edit there much, but it seems like the best thing to do is to simply remove conflicting data from the entry, so I have done so. Innerstream (talk) 12:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Landesmuseum Württemberg-Friedrich I-231230-2.jpg

This painting is obviously PD-art so you shouldn't have tagged it. Please be more careful when putting semi-speedy deletion templates on files. Multichill (talk) 17:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

I see no information about who painted it or when. And I still don't. I see who uploaded it (who is reasonably the photographer, and who has reasonably made a release of their level of contribution to the uploaded file) and who the person is in the painting (irrelevant in this case unless we know it was a live-done portrait). I see where the photograph was taken, and can infer that it is a museum, but our FOP-Germany explicitly excludes museums. I assume you know who the painter is or when it was painted, so please add that information to the image description page so that others are able to verify that it meets the claimed licensing. DMacks (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2-Chlorbenzyliden-Malonsaeuredinitril.png

Sorry, I didn't mean to interfere with your intentions. I thought it was just a little oversight that the discussion wasn't closed and I was just trying to help. Regards, Marbletan (talk) 19:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

No worries! The more hands and eyes acting on that queue the better. DMacks (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Another couple socks

GrayMountain711 is now blocked on EnWiki as a fellow sock in the same sockdrawer as Anonymous91111111, who you blocked yesterday. If you have a moment, do you mind blocking and tagging those two, as well? ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Blocked. I haven't tagged any yet, waiting to see if enwiki feels like setting an SPI or at least declaring who the master would be. DMacks (talk) 02:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! No formal SPI but the master was declared here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I took a look around enwiki, where I found (and blocked) a sleeper, and tagged them all as socks of Anonymous9119, who is the oldest among the set. Should I bother tagging on commons also, or annotating the enwiki block-log to make it easier to see them? DMacks (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

What you've done looks sufficient. Thanks for handling this. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! Thanks for reporting them. DMacks (talk) 00:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Sock returned as Blackrectangles777. I'll file something on EnWiki when I have a spare moment. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Someone else blocked them on enwiki, I tagged, and also blocked and deleted their uploads on commons. Persistent, no? DMacks (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Alliinase

Please take a look at File:Cysteine-to-allicin-2D-skeletal.svg. Somehow this artwork was screwed up so that it renders incomprehensibly on the Wikipedia article.--Smokefoot (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

It looks like User:VIGNERON was working on some things there, and partway through that series things broke. I reverted to the last one that Looks Right To Me(tm). DMacks (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, not sure what happened but sorry about that and thanks for reverting to the last good version. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

EU multimedia

Hey there. I asked about this on the Commons:Help desk, but I guess I can also ask someone on their talk page. The following text will just be pasted from the help desk :) "I have been wondering. So, I have been uploading images from the European Commission as I know those images are okay to upload on to Commons. Recently, I have also seen images from the European Parliament being uploaded under the European Union Government license. So my question is if it's also alright to upload these images as well? There are some images like these ones dating back to 2006 for example, and some even way back to 1995. Are each and every one okay to use?" Bakir123 (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Bakir123. I'm unfortunately not very familiar with the details of EU rules. DMacks (talk) 22:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

What software do you use

Hey, I'm wondering what software you use for the chemical structures you upload. Laura240406 (talk) 07:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

ChemDraw is my primary tool. Definitely not free, and I'm not sure what I would use these days if I did not already own a copy of it. DMacks (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks but can one acquire this as a private person (the website seems to be aimed at companies). Laura240406 (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Googling, I found mentions of personal subscriptions, but the price is even more outrageous now than I recall...many hundreds of dollars per annual subscription. I agree that they really seem to be only targetting large institutions now. en:Molecule editor has a list of several alternatives. DMacks (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:3D methanol molecule with angle.png

Hi, thanks for closing this DR, you forgot to delete the second nominated file. Best, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Oops. Thanks for catching that. DMacks (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Chemistry/Deletion requests

Hi, could you close the oldest DRs there? I have nominated a bunch of files as fake SVGs and replaced them with equivalent versions. And since they were opened more than 7 days ago and the cases are pretty straightforward, they can be closed. Best, ChemSim (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:GS-6207.png is disputed

Thanks for checking over it, User:Mykhal. That indeed does not match the refs. Looks like a hybrid of GS-6207 (with the trifluoromethyls) and GS-CA1 (with the cyclopropanesulfonamide). We already have correct (per refs) diagrams of each of those two chemicals, so this one should be deleted. DMacks (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)