Copyright status: File:Edith Greindl, Marie-Louise Hairs, Michel Kervyn de Meerendre, Margret Klinge, Bénédicte Schifflers, Yvonne Thiery - De Gouden Eeuw van de Vlaamse Schilderkunst, 1990.jpg

Copyright status: File:Edith Greindl, Marie-Louise Hairs, Michel Kervyn de Meerendre, Margret Klinge, Bénédicte Schifflers, Yvonne Thiery - De Gouden Eeuw van de Vlaamse Schilderkunst, 1990.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Edith Greindl, Marie-Louise Hairs, Michel Kervyn de Meerendre, Margret Klinge, Bénédicte Schifflers, Yvonne Thiery - De Gouden Eeuw van de Vlaamse Schilderkunst, 1990.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Edith Greindl, Marie-Louise Hairs, Michel Kervyn de Meerendre, Margret Klinge, Bénédicte Schifflers, Yvonne Thiery - XVIIe siècle, l'âge d'or de la peinture flamande.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Logo mediamonks.jpg

File:Logo mediamonks.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo mediamonks.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Trade (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Koekplanken

Koekplanken has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Bol?

Hi Jane, in het Benaki museum voor Griekse cultuur in Athene kwam ik dit schilderij tegen, het viel me nogal op tussen alle Griekse cultuur. Het bijschrift stelde "zelfportret van Ferdinand Bol", maar dat kan ik mij bijna niet voorstellen... Het was in slechte staat, met plooien, en het hing gewoon in de hal bij de ingang... Het Rijksmuseum heeft dit totaal andere portret met palet. Wat vind jij ervan? Met groet, Ellywa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Ik ben met je eens, maar de museum is leading. Wellicht is het een stuk uit zijn jonge jaren? Het is beslist 17e eeuws, al is het wel gerimpeld (zal wel komen door het klimaat aldaar). Wel een wikidata item waard, hoor! Jane023 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Ja dat het oud is, dat geloof ik meteen. Ik kan er verder niks over vinden, dus dat is wel vreemd. Google image search, Bing en TinEye leveren ook niks op. Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

dat is heel vaak zo met NL werken in verre oorden- over tijd zal dat veranderen, dankzij uploaden, dus bedankt! Je zou nog even kunnen zoeken op artnet, maar dat werkt alleen voor stukken verkocht in de laatste 10 jaar ofzo. Dit zal wel een leen-object zijn want niks vermeld op hun website. Misschien is het opgenomen in een bol catalogus, maar die heb ik niet. Het is zeker niet in de RKD. Gr, Jane023 (talk) 07:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Volgens het bijschrift (niet gefotogafeerd) een gift van iemand aan het museum. Ellywa (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Belangrijke les voor schilderij fans: altijd de bijschrift fotograferen - zelfs als er niks meer vermeld is dan het naam van het kunstenaar. Maar goed, als het museum zegt dat het zo is, dan is het zo (althans het is in de collectie zo gekomen, en is dus geaccepteerd door iemand als door Bol). Voor ons op Commons, is het dus ook door Bol (tot de RKD of Bol historicus het afwijst). Ik doe dit ook voor plaatjes uit oude catalogi, en pas als ik zie dat zij afgewezen worden, zet ik het bij in een sub-categorie als "works after Ferdinand Bol" of ergens anders. Jane023 (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Master Willem van Wibaut

Hallo Jan023, wil je eens kijken naar deze category? Mag ik veronderstellen dat het hier een typo betreft, Wibout/Bibout ? Thanks Lotje (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Ha inderdaad, dat lijkt op een typo! Kennelijk is de Rijksmuseum stuk het enige op Commons op naam van deze kunstenaar. Jane023 (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Dankjewel Jane023, ik voegde het bestand toe aan de Category. Weet niet of een rename aan de orde is. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

IK heb net de juiste record gevonden in het Rijksmuseum en beiden helften zijn ontstaan een halve eeuw na elkaar en in verschillende plaatsen. Gelukkig heb ik mijn foto van de 2021 exhibitie bewaard, want ik was even de kluts kwijt. De Madonna is niet van deze kunstenaar en de afebeelde man is wie de stukken aan elkaar liet monteren voor persoonlijke devotie. Pff Jane023 (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Sjonge Jane023. Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 10:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil - Catálogo provisional historial y razonado del Museo Nacional de pinturas catlogoprovisio00villgoog 0008.jpg

Copyright status: File:Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil - Catálogo provisional historial y razonado del Museo Nacional de pinturas catlogoprovisio00villgoog 0008.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil - Catálogo provisional historial y razonado del Museo Nacional de pinturas catlogoprovisio00villgoog 0008.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

PD Templates added. Ellywa (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! I see I am out of the habit of uploading titlepages. Jane023 (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Jean-Baptiste Descamps - selfportrait.jpg

File:Jean-Baptiste Descamps - selfportrait.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean-Baptiste Descamps - selfportrait.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Okutu Sirkeep.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 03:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Galerie Oldenbourg 1924.jpg

Copyright status: File:Galerie Oldenbourg 1924.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Galerie Oldenbourg 1924.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Marie-Adélaïde Baubry-Vaillant - Portrait of Prince Vinh Thuy in 1926 - T199HK0473 SS-REF2 1.jpg

File:Marie-Adélaïde Baubry-Vaillant - Portrait of Prince Vinh Thuy in 1926 - T199HK0473 SS-REF2 1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marie-Adélaïde Baubry-Vaillant - Portrait of … This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 23, Number 3531, 23 July 1862, A Visit to the Burnt District of Troy, New York.jpg

Copyright status: File:Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 23, Number 3531, 23 July 1862, A Visit to the Burnt District of Troy, New York.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 23, Number 3531, 23 July 1862, A Visit to the Burnt District of Troy, New York.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at [[:Category::Paintings in rhe Parrish Art Museum]]. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 05:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I was going to make a redirect and then realized it should be deleted and forgot all about it while looking for this. Jane023 (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Marie Lucas-Robiquet - Girl Knitting.jpg

File:Marie Lucas-Robiquet - Girl Knitting.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marie Lucas-Robiquet - Girl Knitting.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wiiformii (talk) 00:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Changing {{Book}} to {{Art photo}}

Hello, Jane023. I noticed that some of your changes put files in Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter, because {{Art photo}} doesn't recognize the City parameter. It looks like that happened when you replaced the Book template with the Art photo template. The book template has a City parameter, but the Art photo doesn't. {{Art photo}} does have a location parameter, but it doesn't seem to serve the same purpose so you can't just replace one with the other. I suggest just removing the City parameter when you make these changes. Also, it can help to preview the changes before saving.

Thanks. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I noticed that too, so feel free to remove the city parameter. The files are now more accurate than I found them, but still imperfect, so sorry about that. Jane023 (talk) 21:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

I'll let you remove it, since it was your change. Thanks in advance! -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Von Dürer bis van Gogh - Sammlung Bührle trifft Wallraf-6867.jpg

Hi Jane, happy new year. A question related to your edit: My photo shows two different paintings. Now you have added the Artwork template with one Q-ID only. Do you know if it is possible to add more Q-IDs? Or something else to clarify that 2 paintings are shown. Raymond (talk) 13:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

No but I have done the same thing at exhibitions and I just pick one so I can at least see them later in Petscan. To be thorough, I will later add separate image files for each depicted object in the "|other versions" field using "gallery" "/gallery" and then make sure each file in the gallery has the correct Wikidata item (if I don't crop the image for the files, then I use whatever file is already in the item). Your pictures might prove to be better than the ones currently in use on Wikidata - without checking them I would assume they could be cropped and added to the items anyway with the Wikidata statement for "image with frame", since we are mostly missing images of paintings with frames. Thanks for taking pictures of exhibitions! We need more people doing this. Happy New Year to you too. Jane023 (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick answer. I understand, I think :-) In the past I have taken photos with 2 or more paintings, so cropping could be useful. Last year User:Elya and I have taken photos of every painting in Category:Paris 1863 – 1874: Revolution in der Kunst and detailed photos of paintings of the exhibition Category:Museum der Museen. Eine Zeitreise durch die Kunst des Ausstellens und Sehens , started October 2024, will follow very soon. Raymond (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

How nice! Thanks for doing that - uploading pictures from my phone is a real pain, so I have a huge backlog from museum visits. Someday I hope it gets easier. Jane023 (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

• 
  example here

Master of the Khanenko Adoration-Diptych Kiev

Hello! I would like to publish a reproduction of this image in a book about the city of Ghent (Belgium), which tells the story from prehistory to the year 2000. Is it possible? I will cite the painting "The Master of the Adoration of Khanenko" [Bohdan en Varvara Khanenko Museum kyiv - photo Jane Darnell / Wikimedia Commons]". I have an individual publishing house. The number of copies will be very limited. Kind regards, johnny bekaert - johnny.bekaert@telenet.be poespaproducties.be Johnny VBekaert (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

No, because I didn’t take this photo and have no personal rights to it. As the source line states, it is a website that you can try contacting. If it were me though trying to publish, I would try the Friedlander project or the museum itself. Those pics look much better! Also, if you aren’t publishing in the USA you may also run into copyright issues, even if your source says it’s Ok to use. Copyright on 2-dimensional images of public domain art are still not public domain everywhere in the world.Jane023 (talk) 08:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Licensing

Hello.

FYI licensing works a bit different on here than Wikipedia. File should have a license for the home country, not just the US.

If you import a file from English Wikipedia, could you please add that license? Thanks.

(this message is in reference to this). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:People_painted_by_Frans_Hals

People painted by Frans Hals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Jacob Cornelisz Schout - detail of The Banquet of the Officers of the St George Militia Company in 1616 by Frans Hals.jpg

File:Jacob Cornelisz Schout - detail of The Banquet of the Officers of the St George Militia Company in 1616 by Frans Hals.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacob Cornelisz Schout - detail of The Banque… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Oursana (talk) 00:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Invalid parameter in Artwork template

Hello, Jane023. I noticed that there are many files in Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter as a result of changes you made. The issue is that you added a "City" parameter, but Template:Artwork doesn't have that parameter. Should it be a different parameter, or should it maybe be deleted? Please let me know.

I see that you have AWB access, so you could automate changing or removing this parameter. If you'd like help with that, or if you have any questions about this, feel free to let me know. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:46, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes I noticed that too. I would like to propose deleting this parameter from the book template altogether, as that seems to be the root of the problem. A book can be in a city, but a book page as it is represented on Commons should not have any location other than the book. I have found multiple examples of art books uploaded page by page, and the template book has been misused for this. I am not even sure how to go about discussing this, other than to just request a bot to massively delete such lines from all files using the template that are individual pages. On the other hand, perhaps I am misusing the template art photo for book pages with painting lithos or engravings that are not photo prints. The template was originally meant for new photos taken in museums by Wiki Commonists, but I have found it useful for all sorts of old prints representing paintings. I object to the idea that engravers who worked for book publishers in the 19th century and earlier deserve a wikidata item for each instance of an engraving in a book held by a national library. Since Wiki Commons has thousands of them, maybe a wider discussion on this is needed. I am not an Commons engravings expert, but a Wikidata paintings expert. For some context, look at this book page example that has been uploaded several different ways, each one part of a separate institutional upload: Category:Réjouissance Flamande by Jacques-Philippe Le Bas. So I guess I am still on the fence about a cleanup approach. Maybe what I want for old art book pages is a new template for "painting image" that I could just add with a Wikidata item parameter that filters out noise like that caused by the "book" template (part of my hesitation is wondering if such books are used by some language's wikisource - in this case above that would be Polish). Your thoughts on this are welcome! Jane023 (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2025 (UTC)