User talk:XRayBot

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:XRay.

This is the user talk page of XRay, where you can send messages and comments to XRay.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Quality Image Promotion (26 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudeschild (NL), Fort de Schans -- 2026 -- 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:37, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudeschild (NL), Fort de Schans -- 2026 -- 0290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:46, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oosterend (NL), Windmühle "Het Noorden" -- 2026 -- 0466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 07:09, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
✓ Done It was corrected, but on the wrong line. Sorry. It's right now. --XRay 07:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudeschild (NL), Ortsansicht -- 2026 -- 0469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Audi e-tron -- 2019 -- 5520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:46, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudeschild (NL), Fort de Schans -- 2026 -- 0280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaanse Schans (NL), Windmühlen -- 2026 -- 0491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Cocksdorp (NL), Leuchtturm -- 2026 -- 0450-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Audi Vision GT -- 2019 -- 4563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aciarium 07:19, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudeschild (NL), Fort de Schans -- 2026 -- 0282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaanse Schans (NL), Windmühlen -- 2026 -- 0493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, BMW i8 -- 2019 -- 4390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Jaguar I-Pace -- 2019 -- 4395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, 1. Training, Geox Dragon -- 2019 -- 4713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:29, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaanse Schans (NL), Windmühlen -- 2026 -- 0509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 09:17, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Smart Fortwo -- 2019 -- 4509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:18, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Audi e-tron -- 2019 -- 4522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 14:22, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, 1. Training, HWA Racelab -- 2019 -- 4722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, 1. Training, BMW i Andretti Motorsport -- 2019 -- 4777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, 1. Training, Audi Sport ABT Schaeffler Formula E Team -- 2019 -- 4814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Audi e-tron -- 2019 -- 5512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 16:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Audi e-tron -- 2019 -- 5525.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-14

MediaWiki message delivery 19:22, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

User:XRay/Templates/Notes/Common/Howto

While I appreciate that you're trying to give readers some information on photography, having this template appear on all of the file pages for your photos is causing some problems with search - all of the text is indexed, causing your photos to all appear as results for searches like "long exposure" or "limbic system", even though the photos are not related to those keywords.

Would you mind adding class="navigation-not-searchable" to the information boxes you use on your file pages? This will exclude the text of those elements from MediaWiki search. Omphalographer (talk) 23:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I wasn't familiar with that CSS class. It seems like a good idea to me. Thanks for the tip. I'll add it. BTW: Not all of my pages include these notes—only about a third. That doesn't help with the minor indexing issue. -- XRay 💬 04:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Done. :-) -- XRay 💬 04:37, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Mercedes-Benz EQC -- 2019 -- 5542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FalantoTaras 11:25, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Category:Sunrises_by_year

Category discussion warning

Sunrises by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Prototyperspective (talk) 12:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Mittelbau -- 2026 -- 0532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Kettelersche Doppelkurie -- 2026 -- 0566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good object sharpness and nice colour palette --D-Kuru 15:59, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hollenbeckerstraße 30, Relief des Erzengels Michael -- 2026 -- 0579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TheBritinator 23:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nordflügel -- 2026 -- 0520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TheBritinator 23:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadthaus 1, Magnolie -- 2026 -- 0561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TheBritinator 23:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Antiquariat Solder, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:37, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, DS Techeetah -- 2019 -- 5502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:52, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Mittelbau -- 2026 -- 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hollenbeckerstraße -- 2026 -- 0575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Antiquariat Solder, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hollenbeckerstraße 24, Feng-Shui-Bagua-Spiegel -- 2026 -- 0573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:08, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Mercedes-Benz EQC -- 2019 -- 5538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality and artistic execution. --Aciarium 07:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Low luminance noise in the sky, fixable? --F. Riedelio 08:10, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you. I've improved the noise reduction. --XRay 07:42, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 13:02, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2026 -- 0626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM 1 und 5 -- 2026 -- 0656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Mittelbau -- 2026 -- 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Low luminance noise in the sky, fixable? --F. Riedelio 08:10, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you. I've improved the noise reduction. --XRay 07:42, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 13:02, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Kirschbaum -- 2026 -- 0556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche, Relief -- 2026 -- 0607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Antiquariat Solder, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:25, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Siegelkammer -- 2026 -- 0622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Schlosspark, Narzissen -- 2026 -- 0645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:41, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1192454391

Why? Pleaes see what this tag says and what given category actually contains. Any text can be inscribed and depicted on images in this category. None of the images in this category contains text "Epitaphs" in particular, as claimed in this header template. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 07:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Dear Unknown, the category is assigned to the text categories (for example text with 8 letters), and the suffix also matches the text categories. However, the content does not necessarily fit the category. -- XRay 💬 08:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
I understand this template is appropriate in some other categories with the same suffix, e.g. in Category:Hello (text) where images truely depict text "Hello". In case of Category:Epitaphs (text) however the "(text)" suffix is there for regular disambigution purpose, meaning this category is for epitaphs that are (inscribed) texts, and not for different kinds of epitaphs that are sculptural works. See also category description in category header. The content in this category fits this description as far as I can see. Disambigution text in brackets probably can be something else, too. But then again I doubt that "text" is really reserved only for {{Text cat}} categories, and you should still always check what the category actually contains before adding any such template. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
I realize there are some inconsistencies. But removing the template {{Text cat}} won't solve the problem. Content, descriptions, templates, and categories should be kept separate to resolve the issue properly. Feel free to do that. -- XRay 💬 08:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
What unresolved problem there will be if template is removed? As said, this category never was meant for images depicting eight-letter word "Epitaphs", and regular disambiguation in brackets alone doesn't indicate that category should be used for this specific purpose. No such images that you say this category should be used for even exist. This is about common sense at the end. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Perhaps I should start with a personal note: I really don’t like replying to anonymous users. I never know if the message—which takes some effort on my part—will actually reach them. As for the inconsistencies, let’s consider two things:
  1. According to the categorization, Category Category:Epitaphs is an “Inscription”, meaning it’s already a text. At the same time, it is also a sculpture. That doesn’t quite fit. According to Wikidata epitaph (Q13578361), it is a tomb, i.e., a sculpture.
  2. Category Category:Epitaphs (text) is, according to the naming scheme and categorization, a text in the English language: Category:Images by English text. It is not just any text, but specifically “Epitaphs.” Hence the categorization in Category:Text with 8 letters. The Wikidata mapping epitaph (Q1772), on the other hand, refers to the actual text of the epitaph.
So what should be done? The Wikidata entries, category names, and categorization must be clearly separated into sculpture and text (inscription). The category Category:Epitaphs (text) is reserved for photos containing the text “Epitaphs.” If none exist, it is superfluous. Unfortunately, I’m not particularly skilled in English, but I would split it into Category:Epitaphs and Category:Epitaph inscriptions (which fits with Category:Inscriptions by dedication). The categorization would then need to be adjusted accordingly. -- XRay 💬 14:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
I've made the necessary adjustments. The naming convention fits better with Commons, even though there are now some (acceptable) differences from Wikipedia. -- XRay 💬 17:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
I'm afraid new title "Epitaph inscriptions" isn't better than the previous one, and likely now there are more inconsistencies than before. First, texts in question, often in form of an inscription, are epitaphs (in relevant sense of the word), and so this title seems tautological. Second, it is probably inaccurate to describe all epitaph in the latter sense as inscriptions, even though English description for respective d:Q1772 item currently says so. While an epitaph (text) often is inscribed it necessarily isn't always. As per enwiki definition it is just "a short text honoring a deceased person". This category also includes several epitaph texts that are not inscribed.
As for (previous) inconsistencies, please note that both the "English text" and "8 letters" category were added by the very same odd template. I resolved this inconsistency in the first place with the removal of this template. As for inscriptions parent category in Category:Epitaphs, yes, that was improper for epitaphs in the other sense (sculpture or other artwork) but that's not really related to the template used in the other category. In other words, this template did not and would not fit no matter in what way all inconsistencies mentioned so far are resolved. Also, categorization already was separated, you only renamed the category that is a separate category for texts.
As for Commons conventions and as far as I can see, words in brackets are often used for disambiguation purpose, e.g. see examples in COM:DAB which I already referenced above. Just like in Wikipedia. So word "text" in brackets seemed and still seems to me as a clear disambiguation for given subject, at least more clear and less misleading than current category title. And as far as I can see, nothing forces us to add given template if it says "text" in brackets. Some other disambiguation could be used in brackets, maybe "short text" or "texts" in plural, but I'm not sure if these would be actually better than previous "text". ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 09:02, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
I can see, at least in part, that you're right. After looking around a bit, I found a category with a similar theme: Category:Ectopistes migratorius (texts). So, I'm renaming it to "(texts)". I don't know if it's really good. It's always a problem when things have certain similarities. -- XRay 💬 09:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-15

MediaWiki message delivery 16:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Category:Castles_by_year_of_photographing

Category discussion warning

Castles by year of photographing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:31, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Figur -- 2026 -- 0593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 10:52, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Diözesanbibliothek -- 2026 -- 0580 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:26, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Porsche -- 2019 -- 5545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 06:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Diözesanbibliothek -- 2026 -- 0580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM 1 und 5 -- 2026 -- 0650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2026 -- 0626 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very nice. --ArildV 06:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM 1 und 5 -- 2026 -- 0656 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Mercedes-Benz EQC -- 2019 -- 5536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)