Wikidata:Property proposal/DDB person ID

DDB person ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

Descriptionidentifier for a person in the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (DDB); identifier same as the person's GND ID
RepresentsDeutsche Digitale Bibliothek (Q621630)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainhuman (Q5)
Allowed values[0-9X]{9}
Example 1Helmut Schmidt (Q2516)118608819
Example 2Eva Strautmann (Q1230142)120965100
Example 3Marina Tsvetaeva (Q188526)118638580
Example 4Irene Dingel (Q1672499)111186870
Example 5Martha Nussbaum (Q235470)119546213
Example 6Barack Obama (Q76)132522136
Example 7Wilhelm Marx (Q77183)11873153X
Sourcehttps://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URLhttps://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/person/gnd/$1
See alsoDDB item ID (P4948)
Applicable "stated in"-valueDeutsche Digitale Bibliothek (Q621630)
Single-value constraintyes
Distinct-values constraintyes
Category:Done proposals#DDB%20person%20IDCategory:Property proposal person#DDB%20person%20ID

Motivation

The Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek includes biographical information about persons, photographs, links to items in the DDB collection, and external links. AdamSeattle (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

 Support --Emwille (talk) 00:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
 Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
 Support --Crystal Yragui, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
 Support Thisismattmiller (talk) 21:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
 Support Edsu (talk) 22:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
 Opinion Would not it make sense to rename the property to DDB person (GND) ID similar to Deutsche Biographie (GND) ID (P7902) to highlight the fact that it is still a GND ID (P227), but not every GND ID (P227) resolves to a valid deutsche-digitale-bibliothek page? --Ailintom (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
I think that just makes the name of the property unnecessarily more complex and to what actual benefit? Though it uses the same number used by GND, this is still a unique identifier within the DDB. AdamSeattle (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I would still say, that the description of the property should make it clear that it is the same number as GND ID. And also the format as a regular expression should necessarily be changed to match that of GND ID (P227), because for example 11873153X does not match [0-9]{9} Ailintom (talk) 19:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I made a revision to the description and revised the regular expression. AdamSeattle (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
 Support Ailintom (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

@AdamSeattle, Emwille, ArthurPSmith, Clements.UWLib, Thisismattmiller, Edsu: @Ailintom: ✓ Done: DDB person (GND) ID (P13049). --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:Done proposals Category:Noindexed pages Category:Property proposal person