User talk:Allforrous
Category:Yogis_by_country
|
Yogis by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 11:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Category:History_of_the_World
|
History of the World has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Disabilities
Category:Accessibility is already a subcategory of disabilities Rathfelder (talk) 08:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Category:High_courts
|
High courts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 06:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Category:Fantasy literature
Prototyperspective (talk) 20:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:Sea_and_river_deities
|
Sea and river deities has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:2019 in transport in the Netherlands
Good evening dear Allforrous, I've just seen your revision of my edit on above mentioned category. Could you please explain the purpose of this to me? I actually don't understand it, because it is much easier to edit the template instead of all its categories. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is the way to modify main category and secondary categories, if there are any or any. Allforrous (talk) 00:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am referring to the categories cataloged with "| " and "|*". Allforrous (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- This would also be possible by editing the template. Or am I missing something here? Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. But I'm not a template editor. Allforrous (talk) 23:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, but could you then please stop editing categories with templates, because it's way easier to edit one template instead of countless categories? This is also the reason, why we are using templates. Many thanks. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please have a look at my edit on Template:Transportyear-Netherlands: link. I've already fixed the problem for you. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 12:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I will take your advice into account, to apply it from now on. Best regards. Allforrous (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please have a look at my edit on Template:Transportyear-Netherlands: link. I've already fixed the problem for you. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 12:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, but could you then please stop editing categories with templates, because it's way easier to edit one template instead of countless categories? This is also the reason, why we are using templates. Many thanks. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. But I'm not a template editor. Allforrous (talk) 23:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- This would also be possible by editing the template. Or am I missing something here? Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am referring to the categories cataloged with "| " and "|*". Allforrous (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:Agricultural_land
|
Agricultural land has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 17:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:1969_archaeological_discoveries
|
1969 archaeological discoveries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Category:Anti-nuclear power movement
Hello, Allforrous. I know that the title with an en dash is correct, but some Commons admins (e.g. User talk:Russian Rocky#Category:Anti–nuclear power movement) are unhappy with us using en dashes in category names. Let's, at least, keep hyphenated redirects for the search. Russian Rocky (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Western_(genre)_theme_parks
|
Western (genre) theme parks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Astros4477 (talk) 14:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Hungarian_folklore
|
Hungarian folklore has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Cryptic-waveform Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Hindu_yogis
|
Hindu yogis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 10:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Bengali-speaking_people_by_occupation
|
Bengali-speaking people by occupation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 11:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Deities_and_spirits
|
Deities and spirits has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 16:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:High courts of Scotland
Pretzelles (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Yacón syrup has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ies (talk) 10:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Robes and cloaks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 17:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Category:Early_lives_by_individual has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 19:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Greek theatre
Hi, can you explain your thinking in the two edits that you made to this category please? Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- Unless I hear from you by tomorrow then I will revert your edits Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks to @MrKeefeJohn: I don't need to fix this. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Laurel Lodged: I explain my edits in Category talk:Ancient Greek theatre MrKeefeJohn (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks to @MrKeefeJohn: I don't need to fix this. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Crises prevention
Hello. I noticed your edits. I think Category:Crises prevention (maybe the name should be questioned) should not be put under "Category:Prevention", because it contains images of the preparations for crisis. Prevention often means measures aimed to avoid something from happening. This category is about the preparations. Cats' photos (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Timepieces has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
|
History of Ireland by topic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Robby (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Category:Negative_concepts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 03:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Revert
See Commons:Village_pump#Category:Categories_by_association. I'm the middle of axing a couple of the more ambiguous "categories by association" and "people associated with events" is particularly nonsensical. Most people are associated with events. Especially when it comes to something like COVID. Adamant1 (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Category:Advertising_by_type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Meteorological phenomena has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]]. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 16:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Meteorological phenomena
Hi:
Please stop adding this category to items as they all have more precise categories already that are sub-categories of Category:Meteorological phenomena. This is redundant! (idem for categories e.g. Category:Crow instabilities is in Category:Clouds which is in Category:Weather phenomena)
Categorizing music by year
Hallo, could you help in the discussione started here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2025/03/Category:Music_in_Lombardy_by_year with a group of Wikipedians opposing categories for music by year, saying it gives birth to category that are too small and not meaningful? They seem not to grasp what a chronology is... It was all started by one person, who then called a group of people sharing his point of view. Thank you. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
MetaCat vs. CatCat
Hi, Allforrous. I noticed that you put the {{MetaCat}} template on some articles for characters by name. Those are not metacats because the subcats don't group characters with the same name. Therefore I changed the MetaCat templates to CatCat templates.
The "by name" categories can be tricky when deciding whether to use MetaCat or CatCat. Sometimes they're metacats, sometimes they're not. It depends on what's in the subcats. Most categories of people or characters by name are not metacats. That's because each subcat is for just one individual. An example of a by-name category that is a metacat is Category:Hotels by name. Each subcat there is for all hotels with the indicated name. For example, two of the subcats are Category:Grand Hotels and Category:Hotels named Plaza. In each case, multiple hotels with the same are grouped in a subcat.
If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hello.Thank you for your attention in clarifying this issue. I will take this into account, from now on, when promoting changes. Best regards. Allforrous (talk) 22:59, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Category:Craftsmen
|
Craftsmen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Category:Words_coined_in_the_1930s
|
Words coined in the 1930s has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
—andrybak (talk) 21:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've expanded this listing at Commons:Categories for discussion to include other categories named "Words coined in the <decade>". —andrybak (talk) 21:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Category:Human_populations
|
Human populations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 16:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Category:Virgo Vestalis Maxima
This category and the item it conects to is about the high priestess position, not a statue. StarTrekker (talk) 00:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
More efficient way to add interwiki-links
Dear Allforous,
Thirst I would like to thank you for your hard and fruitful work here on Commons as well as on en.wikipedia. I noticed that when you create a category with the name:'xyz' here on Commons for which there exist corresponding categories on other wikipedia projects - of which you are aware you add the interwiki links by adding e.g. en:Category:xyz> inside the category page. This is not the most efficient way as by this way of proceeding you just add the interwikilink in the left-side menu to en wikipedia but no the links to other language versions.
I fully understand that this way of acting you do not need to make any search on wikidata to add the link to newly created categories on the corresponding item on wikidata. I would just like to suggest you to stop this and replace this way of proceeding with the following:
Just click here on Commons on the created Commons category on the leftside menu on 'In Wikipedia' on the text link 'Add links' which will open a pop-up box with the title 'Link with page' where you can then add the link to the corresponding article on en.wikipedia.
By doing so you will see the infobox - if you have added the template 'Wikidata Infobox' in the created category - filled with information on the created category page it will not be necessary to add the interwiki-link inside the newly created category here on Commons. You may for instance have a look on the history of Category:Conferences in 1917 for which I proceeded this way and could then simply delete the interwiki-link inside the category here on Commons.
I hope these explanations are clear and please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to have additional explanations on this topic.
Category:Critical_thinking_skills
|
Critical thinking skills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Prototyperspective (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Seed Catalog.
Do NOT move these into the year categories, until you have checked the license, Many of these were uploaded with the wrong one. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- OK Allforrous (talk) 22:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Mohism works
Thanks for working on these. Do you by chance know of a translation of the Mozi in English that is freely licensed or in the public domain? Thanks/謝謝. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Category:Electrical Station
This category is for a fictional location. It should not be used for photographs of actual electrical substations, such as File:Electrical station - geograph.org.uk - 3930810.jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Omphalographer: Then it would probably be a good idea to rename it as Category:Electrical Station (Backrooms). - Jmabel ! talk 20:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not certain the category should exist at all; see User talk:Auntof6#"Don't use the template if the category was recently unconsensually emptied" for some related discussion. But if it is kept, I agree. Omphalographer (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Category:Priesthood_(Judaism)
|
Priesthood (Judaism) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Joalbertine (talk) 19:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Category:Jewish_priests
|
Jewish priests has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Joalbertine (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Category:Feminism_and_society
|
Feminism and society has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Category:Krishna-Chaitanya, His Life and His Teachings
There are 2 books here, with different publication dates. This category should not be given a date. Rathfelder (talk) 21:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- The book consists of two parts. Allforrous (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe, but these files have very different dates. Rathfelder (talk) 08:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Category question
Hi Allforrous! I didn't see your category and created a new one. Which one should we keep?
Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure which one is more common. Thank you for putting in the redirect. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:27, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Category:Common English Bible
Policy is that Individual books and particular subject areas should normally be filed in appropriate parts of Category:Books by topic, and not here. Rathfelder (talk) 08:48, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Category:Common English Bible
Policy is that Individual books and particular subject areas should normally be filed in appropriate parts of Category:Books by topic, and not Category:Non-fiction books. Rathfelder (talk) 08:50, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- They are two different things. One is an attribute, the other is a qualifying adjective. Allforrous (talk) 15:01, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Dutch language Wikipedia
Hello Allforrous, wondering why you were blocked here Sockpuppets? Cheers. Lotje (talk) 16:17, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- I don't have the answer. I don't know the language. I don't have puppets. I don't know. Thank you for asking. Allforrous (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to be able to let you know Milliped unblocked your account on the Dutch language Wikipedia Cheers. Happy editing
Lotje (talk) 13:43, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Dear colleague: Thank you for your understanding. This is great news, after more than 15 years of collaboration on the Wikimedia project. Thank you very much and best regards. Allforrous (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to be able to let you know Milliped unblocked your account on the Dutch language Wikipedia Cheers. Happy editing
Reverts
Are you going to revert all of them? They're all the same. I added it with cat-a-lot. Category:Poets from England and Category:Poets from Scotland are treated this way (like non-diffusing parent categories). I just figured it wood be strange to have the Ireland poets category be the only one completely separated by male and female. Geoffroi 23:04, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Is OVERCAT. Allforrous (talk) 23:05, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- There are 200+ files with the same category situation in Category:Poets from Ireland, Category:Poets from England, and Category:Poets from Scotland. If you want to revert the Irish ones, just use cat-a-lot. The English and Scottish ones need to be sorted into male and female first. Then all the other poets by country categories need to be sorted. Geoffroi 23:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Needle exchange
Isn't this redundant? It's already in Category:Needle exchanges. - Jmabel ! talk 04:34, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's already corrected. Allforrous (talk) 15:34, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Speedy delete requests on categories that have an open CFD
Hello, Allforrous. I am processing your speedy deletion request for Category:NBC LX Home affiliates. When you put a speedy deletion request on an category that has an open CFD, please leave the CFD on the page as well. That makes it easier for the closing admin to see that the CFD exists so they can close that, too. Thanks! -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:49, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Understood. Thank you. Allforrous (talk) 20:40, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
"Category:UML_activity_diagrams"
|
UML activity diagrams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
MetaCat template parameters
Hi, Allforrous. Thanks for working on meta categories. I noticed that some of your recent changes, like this one,this one, and this one, added incorrect sort criterion parameters. There are a couple of different issues:
- Metacat sort criterion parameters should always exactly match the sort criteria indicated in the category name, even if it isn't recognized (yet) by the template that processes it.
- With double metacats, the criterion that is different for each subcat goes first.
For the ones I listed, and one or two others, I changed the metacat parameters to be correct. If you have any questions about it, feel free to ask. Thanks again for your work. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your constant attention and your commitment and dedication. Allforrous (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Political people from Russia
"Political people" is totally meaningless and there's already more descriptive categories for people that are actually involved in politics as an occupation. So I don't really think the category, or similar ones, are worth having. Per Commons:Categories "We should not classify items which are related to different subjects in the same category. There should be one category per topic; multi-subject categories should be avoided. The category name should be unambiguous and not homonymous." A "political person" is essentially everyone on the planet. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:37, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Category:Adinkra symbols by name
Hi, Allforrous. I saw that you added a metacat template to this category. However, it is not a metacat. I changed the template to {{CatCat}} instead. This is the same issue as discussed above called "MetaCat vs. CatCat". If you'd like more clarification, please feel free to ask at any time! -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:28, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
"Historical transcontinental empires"
A couple of things. "Historical" categories are being phased out in favor of "history." Every other category having to do similar subjects is "history", not "historical." Also there is no category for transcontinental empires to begin with. So the category makes zero sense. I don't think it's necessary anyway but at least name the category correctly and create one for transcontinental empires if your going to do it. Although it seems like you to just mass create categories regardless of if they make sense or actually help people organize images. So I'd ask you just not to. Leave those types of categories to Wikipedia or another project. Categories like Category:Historical transcontinental empires do absolutely nothing to help people organize or find images. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Adamant1 there is quite a difference between "transcontinental empires" and "transcendental empires". May I assume that the latter was a typo? - Jmabel ! talk 05:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Just to add to that, it looks like you created Category:Modern history by country when Category:Modern history redirects to Category:Modern period. Again, I'd say such a category is totally pointless and doesn't help people organize images but it shouldn't be that hard to follow the naming conventions for similar categories. Although I'd argue "modern period by country" is kind of meaningless and shouldn't exist anyway but if you going to do it, at least do it properly. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Not to be rude, but it's super uncollaborative to make people do CfDs to fix every minor mistake you make. It shouldn't be that hard to either create categories that follow the guidelines to begin with or not edit war other people when they try to deal with it if your not willing to. You've been on here long enough and had enough categories nominated for discussion to know how to name a category properly. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:31, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Category:Countries_and_territories_by_official_language
|
Countries and territories by official language has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Over categorization
Hi. You keep putting Category:Russian Empire in top level categories for the history of Russia when it's already in child categories for the same, or similar, ones. Which is clearly over categorization. It's totally pointless to put it 25 different ambiguous categories for history, time period, historical era, date, Etc. Etc. that are are all children and parents of each other. Please stop. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:59, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Category:Historical_transcontinental_empires
|
Historical transcontinental empires has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Category:/pol/_phenomena
|
/pol/ phenomena has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Prototyperspective (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Chlorine compounds and similar
Hello Allforrous, I must revert lots of your changes in these cases. In example all Grignard-like compounds are not chlorides, due not having free chlorde ions. Regards JWBE (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ok Allforrous (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Information on temporary account IP viewer rights
Hello Allforrous,
On November 12, temporary accounts will be enabled on Commons. The IP of unregistered users will then be hidden for most users. You, as a patroller or license reviewer, are eligible to request the new temporary account IP viewer right, if you need it to continue fighting vandalism and abuse on Commons. If you want to request the right, please file the request here. Please be aware that you also have to accept the Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy in your preferences. For more information about temporary accounts, look at the project page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary account IP viewer granted

Hello, Allforrous. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Commons:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
- You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
- Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).
It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:
- When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
- Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
- Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).
Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Abzeronow (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your attention. I will keep in mind all the obligations related to the flag. Allforrous (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Category:Emotion
|
Emotion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Category:Non-proteinogenic amino acids
|
Non-proteinogenic amino acids has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Category:Oxygen evolution
Do you understand that "evolution" of oxygen is simply the chemical production of oxygen, and is not part of biological evolution? Do you understand that "Evolution" has a difference sense of meaning here? The word "evolution" in chemical processes simply means "production, release", whereas biological evolution is about the change of genetic in populations. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Category:Junkyard tornado
|
Category:Junkyard tornado has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--EncycloPetey (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Category:Structure_by_country
|
Structure by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
ReneeWrites (talk) 20:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Category:Unsolved problems in neuroscience
Prototyperspective (talk) 19:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Category:Facades by style by country
Hi, Allforrous. Thanks for adding the metacat template to this category. I noticed that you had the parameters in the wrong order, though, so I changed them. I know it seems wrong to have the metacat parameters in the opposite order from the category name, but that's the way it's supposed to go.
One way to tell which order the metacat parameters should be in is to look at what's different among the subcats. In this case, each subcat specifies a different country, so that's the parameter that should go first. Another way is to look at the category name like this: "Facades by style" is the category topic, and "by country" is the sort criterion so "country" goes first.
There's a lot that's confusing about metacats, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hello. Thank you for the explanation, and I will keep it in mind for the future. Allforrous (talk) 21:54, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Category:MacOS_games
|
MacOS games has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Cat:Structure
Hello ... please stop inserting pages into Category:Structure ... putting in every single chemical structure, every single construction, every single event, mathematical and programming-related stuff ... etc would result in a huge mess of gazillions of files having very little to nothing common. Commons is not a dictionary. The meanings of the word "structure" are already covered at WIKTIONARY. Taylor 49 (talk) 01:17, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- My reference is Wikipedia. What is your reference? Allforrous (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for the changes you've been making that are helping clear Category:Metacategories not fully sorted into flat categories. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- One note, though: the topic parameters on the MetaCat template are deprecated, so maybe you could remove them instead of fixing them? Thanks again! -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:27, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- ok Allforrous (talk) 23:49, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Category:Fictional_characters_by_role_in_the_narrative_structure
|
Fictional characters by role in the narrative structure has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Omphalographer (talk) 07:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Category:Family_by_country
|
Family by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Category:Freemasonry-related_controversies
|
Freemasonry-related controversies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Category:Population_diagrams_by_country
|
Population diagrams by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Prototyperspective (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Category:Entities_by_country
|
Entities by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:01, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Systems_by_country
|
Systems by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 13:38, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Human_activities
|
Human activities has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 13:54, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
"Red" categories
You've added several "red" categories at Category:Hoquiam Olympic Stadium. Do you plan to create them? - Jmabel ! talk 19:38, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- There's no reason why they're required to. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:20, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: did I say there was? I am trying to find out if they will follow through before taking it on myself if they won't. - Jmabel ! talk 14:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Gerry Park
Monument or memorial to whom or what? I reverted you the first time because I had no idea what you were claiming, and you simply re-added with no further explanation. - Jmabel ! talk 03:24, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hello. You got the wrong user (this is about User:Infrastorian). This is already a blatant persecution against me. This is a regrettable and reprehensible discrimination on the Wiki, it is inappropriate for an administrator. Thank you for your attention. Allforrous (talk) 23:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- I presume that you acknowledge that this which restored the category I removed is your edit.
- I now see that you did not add it the first time; sorry for not reading more closely; usually when I remove something with a comment and someone flips it right back within hours without comment, it's the same person. - Jmabel ! talk 02:11, 29 May 2026 (UTC)