Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
| These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
|---|---|
| Request completed | |
| Request declined | |
| Information | |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
Aokoroko
- Aokoroko (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
- Majow (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
Reason: both accounts are used in similar and very specifical threads - Mandelbrot set. The user page Majow was created by user Aokoroko. The user Majow has voted only twice on the FPC, and both times for nominations by user Aokoroko. It very much like a sock behavior. I would like to be wrong because i like images by Aokoroko. George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
JefeJosh5910
- JefeJosh5910 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
- Westcoastfan2009 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
Reason: They both uploaded the same file:King Lil G.jpg. Now Westcoastfan is only warned, but if they are related, then he must be indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
Cloudbunker
- Cloudbunker (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
- Daylight Specialists (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Jackcpa90 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Freight Collection Solutions Law Group, PLLC (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Complete Healthcare Business Consulting (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Tinsley Medical Practice Brokers (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Dunncreekadvisors (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Reedtinsley (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Intellestate Law (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Hoffman Family Law, PC (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
Reason: Spammer using exactly the same pattern: Creating a userpage of a few lines containing a weblink and uploading a logo. All edits within about an hour. Please check for others I don't see. --Achim55 (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Confirmed There was one more. All blocked and tagged. See Category:Sockpuppets of Dunncreekadvisors. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:23, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Found more via edit filter 85. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives