User talk:Poketalker

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Poketalker!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ລາວ | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

VH-OQA and VH-OQC

  • Please revert your latest changes and remove the table. There is a standard format (which I had reverted to) which should be used. Ardfern (talk) 08:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
    @Ardfern: appreciate your attempted standardization; however, it would be on my discretion whether to use either table or standard format on the aircraft registration categories. What's your concern with the former, anyway? Refer me to a Commons policy of discouraging the tabular format, if you can; am about finish the same with the Lufthansa A388s, the serials are already accounted for with their nicknames... and am not the only editor who has started using the tabular. ~ POKéTalker) 07:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Hardly a baseless revert to the standard format used on virtually all aircraft. It is not my standardisation by the way, it's just the way it has been done by common practice for the last 15 or more years. But hey, just you do whatever you want. Ardfern (talk) 10:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Category:Airbus A350-900 built in 2025

  • Could you please stop setting up empty categories which contain no images and only info about an aircraft. This info should only be placed against an image and not stand in its own right. Wikimedia is a catalogue of images. Categories with info only and no images will be deleted. I have already speedy deleted some in category:Airbus A350-900 built in 2024 where there were no images. Could you please revert your entries in the 2025 cat, where there are no images. The info you are adding is ultimately useful but should only accompany a relevant image. This is not a catalogue of all Airbus A350s built, but a catalogue of images of Airbus A350s. Ardfern (talk) 21:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
    All right, but reversions aren't possible at the moment as being pre-occupied in other wikis; please take your (and your peers') time to delete whatever doesn't contain images. Who knows when images of said aircraft be uploaded here... have been seeing occasional (Recreated) in history logs for such lucky additions. ~ POKéTalker) 02:11, 7 April 2026 (UTC)