Wikimore


Home	Talk	About me	Articles	eMail	Contributions	Images	Archive	Sandbox	Todo	Toolbox

Status

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Igbo ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dali image

You might like to comment here, as you previously commented on this issue. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Dali

The appropriate place for the discussion is the policy change talk page. Once that is ironed out, the image can be undeleted without any further discussion. But until such point, it is not de minimis per Commons now and is thus out of scope, as explained by MichaelMaggs in the discussion, including his conversation with Mike. The closure was not an indication that this must be salted never to return, but at THIS point, the conversation belongs on the de minimis policy page, not at COM:UND. Thanks! -- Avi (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

The GC does not decide policy or matters of scope, Evrik, we Commonists do. Everyone but yourself believes that the image is NOT de minimis now and will not be until the Commons de minimis policy is changed. Please respect that and work on changing the Commons de minimis policy instead. That is the appropriate venue. -- Avi (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Evrik, if the consensus of the respondents in the discussion is not to restore it until the policy is clarified, the discussion should be closed. Do you realize that you are single-handedly ignoring the consensus opinion of all the other respondents? -- Avi (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

The discussion is over, Evrik. Everyone but yourself wants the image to be deleted until the policy is ironed out. Keeping it open will not return the image faster. -- Avi (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Evrik, this is just an unasked for piece of friendly advice. Your behavior in re-opening the discussion is grounds for a behavioral complaint. Furthermore, you may be alienating people who agree with you that the policy should be adjusted because of your perceived intransigence and possible lack of a desire to work with other people. My advice to you would be to accept the consensus on COM:UNDEL and work to quickly adjust the de minimis policy so thatthe image comes back into scope. Feel free to ignore me :) -- Avi (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC) /

I second that. Your attitude is becoming disruptive. –Tryphon ^☂ 18:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Evrik. I'm going to reinsert Tryphons second closure of this undeletion request. A new undeletion request may be filed if, and only if, our policy of de minimis is changed. Do not revert this closure again. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I second the above comments. Your re-opening of closed DRs is disruptive. Let me be frank: you are at risk on being blocked if you do it again. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

Hi Evrik !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As might know already, the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edit made by anonymous users on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by checking an Anonymous edits checklist and patrol a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. –Krinkle^talk 17:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 62866d79a6ab8abc3474dcd39d5bb74d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:BAL Penn station.png

File:BAL Penn station.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ST ○ 23:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

it's a picture of the building. The statue just happens to be in front of it. Evrik (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please don't renew your copyvio, you might be blocked for this project otherwise. This is actual US-Law. That might be stupid (it is in fact), but it's real. --ST ○ 06:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

On top of the world

Too bad i didn't have a good photo of it to upload!

Smallbones (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

A new noticeboard for permission requests from external sources

English ∙ русский ∙ +/−

Dear License reviewer,

This is to inform you that a new page, Commons:Permission requests, has been created to centralize and manage requests for permission to external sources. The page is intended to help streamline the review process by providing a dedicated space where users can submit and track their permission requests.

You may wish to visit the page to familiarize yourself with its purpose and format, and to monitor any new submissions that may require your attention. By default, license reviewers may process requests on the page. Any questions may be directed at Commons talk:Permission requests.

Thank you for your continued work in ensuring proper license compliance across Commons.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Information on temporary account IP viewer rights

Hello Evrik,

On November 12, temporary accounts will be enabled on Commons. The IP of unregistered users will then be hidden for most users. You, as a patroller or license reviewer, are eligible to request the new temporary account IP viewer right, if you need it to continue fighting vandalism and abuse on Commons. If you want to request the right, please file the request here. Please be aware that you also have to accept the Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy in your preferences. For more information about temporary accounts, look at the project page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

File tagging File:Revival Vintage Spirits - exterior1.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Revival Vintage Spirits - exterior1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Revival Vintage Spirits - exterior1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 14:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@Belbury: There should have been an OTRS ticket. Evrik (talk) 22:45, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Category:Ancient_Roman_saints

Ancient Roman saints has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:56, 12 August 2026 (UTC)