Older threads you will find here: User talk:Gampe/Archive

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Giles in Prague, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. (The scope must be related to a category. So I've changed it. I hope it's OK now.)--JLPC (talk) 08:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token: 88e828c1771dc16fad949afc1595b3bc

I am now proud owner of a WMFLabs TUSC account!--Gampe (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You are a very good uploader ! Thanks for your contribs ! Photographically - Yours Frze > talk 03:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank You! --Gampe (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamenicka 35-1512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamenicka 35-1515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIR House CTU 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Letná palace 5953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Letná palace 5958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

New Fotograf

Hi Gampe, I have seen a new User:Radka.Novakova.9, with photos near Brno, but I think she need a little help, I don't now, if there speak more than cestina ;-) it's only information, and have a nice day, regards from the neighbourhood --K@rl (talk) 12:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, this one I don't see it ;-) --regards K@rl (talk) 13:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Descriptions

Hi Gampe, now a new request: the photos from User:Martina Pařízková haven't a description. There are not many, but for the few, which I know, I added ingerman, parhaps you can add there in česky too. regards and děkuji --K@rl (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi K@rl, all contributions of Martina Pařízková are from WLM 2013. Since then she had no editing. --Gampe (talk) 18:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

I know,but the photos havent a decription till now :-) - this was the request, that you can add this description - there are not so many photos.-regards K@rl (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Done (I hope). Thanks! --Gampe (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Josef Ullmann - Oráč (po r.1910).jpg

Prosím o kontrolu tohoto souboru: File:Josef Ullmann - Oráč (po r.1910).jpg po jeho načtení se tam ukazuje toto: Error in template * unknown parameter name (Template:Information): '1; 2'

patrně jsem něco udělal špatně, ale nemohu příjít na co jsem udělal špatně. Nerozumím tomu. Děkuji--Martin wolf (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Problém byl v té složité internetové adrese, která obsahovala znaky, se kterými si šablona nevěděla rady. Zjednodušil jsem ji. Druhá věc, kterou jsem tam našel, byla kategorie, kde se míchali dva Josefové Ullmanové. Rozsadil jsem je a udělal rozcestník. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 04:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Děkuji za pomoc. S tím jsem si nevěděl rady. Toho malíře Josefa Ullmanna jsem založil na Wikipedii, ale adresa Josef Ullmann již byla obsazená, tak jsem musel založit Josef Ullmann (malíř). Na commons však někdo načetl jeho obrazy pod Josef Ullmann a tak jsem tam s tím kouzlil, abych to nějak sloučil. Ještě se v tom tolik nevyznám. Něco podobného se stalo u stránky Josef Král (malíř). Stránku jsem založil pod touto již připravenou adresou (na Wikipedii svítila červeně), ale na comons někdo načet jeho obrazy pod adresou Josef Jaroslav Král. Dal jsem to (ani nevím jak) do podkategorie. Josef Král (malíř) a Josef Jaroslav Král jsou jedna osoba. Díky za pomoc a zdravím--Martin wolf (talk) 07:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ernestine Roessler.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ernestine Roessler.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Ernestine Schumann-Heink young.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

• solved --Gampe (talk) 03:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Categories in slovak monuments

Ahoj Gampe, I need your help, because it looiks like, that an slovak user the User:Ľuboš Repta don't understand the sceme of the categories of monuments in slovakie. Each community need an own category:Cultural monuments in xy, because they are used in slovak and german articles and wikidata to upload files. But I think he understand wheter teh english explanation nor the sense of the system. This system is approx. teh austrian and works thince few years. Perhaps its possible, that you can explain him this. It's not necessarey, that he makes new categories, vbut he shgould not disturb the existing system. thank a lot --regards K@rl (talk) 16:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a dustspot in the sky. --Tsungam 14:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC) corrected --Gampe 16:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC) Good for me now. --Tsungam 16:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odborový dům Na Perštýně.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Zdravím,

ano, ta fotka je naše a byla pořízena někým z rodiny. Vyšla v tisku mnohokrát.

:File:Myrtil Frída.JPG

přesunuto na diskusní sttánku User talk:Jiri.cieslar. --Gampe (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

podivná změna při nahrávání obrázků

Změnil se nějak spůsob při vytváření kategorií nově nahraných obrázků? Chová se to jinak než jsem byl zvyklí. Postupuji tak jak jste mě napsal, ale hlásí to pořád, že je kategorie prázná i když jsem nahrál obrázek.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%A0tefan_Onder%C4%8Do_%281884-1937%29.jpeg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:%C5%A0tefan_Onder%C4%8Do

Nevím jak bych lépe posal. Díky za odpověď.--Martin wolf (talk) 23:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

U mě se to chová normálně, i na wikidatech je vše v pořádku. Ono to někdy chvilku trvá, než se všechny změny projeví. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 03:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Děkuji za odpověď. Máte pravdu, už je to v pořádku. Takto se to zachovalo poprvé, že se nic nezobrazilo asi deset minut a tak jsem znejistil. Načetl jsem další obrázeka a zase nic. Nechal jsem toho a raději se vás zeptal. Příště počkám. Hezký den --Martin wolf (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Díky za zprávu, Mně to dnes zlobí podobným způsobem jako Vás, nahrál jsem ráno fotku a doteď se v kategorii neobjevuje. mějte se hezky. --Gampe (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Slezská němčina - Audio

Cześć Gampe!

Pare miesięcy temu nagrałeś wymowę nazw miejscowości w dialekcie górnołużyckim (Oberlausitzer Mundart) np. Äberuderwitz^ⓘ.

Czy możesz zrobić coś takiego dla dialektu śląskiego (Slezská němčina) np.:

Można to zapisać np. jako Sli-Brassel.ogg, Sli-Schläsing.ogg itd. Będę serdecznie wdzięczny za pomoc. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.70.56.196 (talk) 12:18, 02 December 2015 (UTC)

Cześć, there is no problem, but one: we need to find a native speaker of Silesian German. Do you know someone like that? I will try to ask my Silesian friends. --Gampe (talk) 12:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Dzięki za odpowiedz ogólne zasady wymowy tego dialektu śląskiego są takie same jak w języku niemiecku np. sch to polskie sz, tz to polskie c itd. Są też ciekawostki jak Ae czyta się to, jak polskie e (i zawsze Ae występuje na początku wyrazu np.: Aeberschläsing, Aeberbeuthn). Przykładowo: Bunzel czyta się po polsku jak Buncel, Brassel to po polsku wymawia się jak Brasel, zaś Schläsing czyta się jak po polsku Szlezing

W Google tłumacz jest funkcja słuchaj https://translate.google.pl/?hl=pl&tab=wT#de/pl/Brassel tam jest przybliżona wymowa tych wyrazów. Ogólne zasady wymowy są takie same jak w j. niemiekim tylko Ae czyta jak e. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.70.56.196 (talk) 16:32, 02 December 2015 (UTC)

Nie umię zrobić to w ten sposób. Moje rekordy zostały wykonane w ten sposób: miejscowy ekspert powiedział: ten człowiek mówi naprawdę autentyczne miejscowego dialektu. Potem poprosiliśmy, że człowiek, aby zapoznać się z nazwy i nagrałem go. Nie umię pracować z tych narzędzi Google. --Gampe (talk) 04:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Google tłumacz to był tylko taki przykład (nie sugeruj się tym). Jeśli naprawdę znalazłeś jakiegoś człowieka, który posługuję się tym dialektem i go nagrasz to cudownie. Podsumowując nagraj wymowę tych nazw miejscowości tak jak zrobiłeś to w dialekcie górnołużyckim (Oberlausitzer Mundart) np. Äberuderwitz^ⓘ. PS. Serdecznie dziękujem, że się tym zainteresowałeś. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.70.56.196 (talk) 08:31, 03 December 2015 (UTC)

Gampe nie zapomnij o tym projekcie wiele Ślązaków czeka na ten projekt Slezská němčina - Audio— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.207.118.77 (talk) 20. 6. 2016, 22:14‎ (UTC)

Cześć Gampe! Możesz te miejscowości nareszcie nagrać w audio. Dzięki temu uratujesz historię i kulturę tych ziem.

File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg

File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Alinea (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg

File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kiefer AEIOU 2013-6.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:LX/Unused user page images, 2005–200… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:NicknameGampe1946.jpg

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

ok, delete it please, there is no usage tor it.--Gampe (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

No source / OTRS missing

Hi Gampe! Could you please check: File:01 Rozmberk Jakobinka beranidlo.jpg. I can't find an OTRS Ticket. Do you still have the ticket number? Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

And the other ones from Jitka Skořepová are without ticket as well. Please help! Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg

File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wiki02CinoFront1965.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlstejn (5711).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlstejn (5651).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Kampus Dejvice logo.png

File:Kampus Dejvice logo.png has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kampus Dejvice logo.png This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Fotky z Kostel na dědině a v městečku

Ahoj Gampe, kde jsi sebral fotky z knihy Kostel na dědině a v městečku? Nikde to není digitalizováno. Dominikmatus (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Digitalizuji sám, ale po kousíčkách. Co bys potřeboval?--Gampe (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Chystám článek o kostelu v Tamovicích (Štramberk) a napsal jsem o kostelu v Rybí. Dominikmatus (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Rybí ti naskenuju ale Tamovice v seznamu (viz odkaz výše) nevidím. nebo je to skryto pod nějakým jiným názvem? --Gampe (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Aha, tak je to pod Závišicemi. Dominikmatus (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Máš je tam:

• File:Vavrousek Kostel 54 Závišice.jpg
• File:Vavrousek Kostel 55 Závišice.jpg --Gampe (talk) 05:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 7.jpg

Ahoj, mohl bys prosím do File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 7.jpg doplnit interní odkazy na vyobrazená díla? Podle mého soudu nejde úplně o COM:De minimis, takže je to nejspíš nutné. A zvaž to raději i u File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 2.jpg a File:Wiki Loves Monuments exhibition in ED Praha 4.jpg. Díky moc. S pozdravem --Mates (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Jasně, je to tam. --Gampe (talk) 15:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Schöne Weihnachten

Ahoj, ich wünsche dir schöne Feiertage und ein gutes neues Jahr. --lg aus Wien K@rl (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

The Commons Barnstar

		The Commons Barnstar
		Hi Gampe! I've been away for a while from Wikimedia projects, including OTRS. Since I came back, one of the first things I noticed was your activity in different fields and projects. Please, let me award you with this barnstar for "particularly fine contributions to Commons". I consider you to be one of the most valuable contributors. You work offline a lot, you connect people and promote Wikimedia projects like Commons out there. That's something what is so needed! I believe we need to support more people like you. Thank you so much for your long lasting work, it's admirable. All the best, Podzemnik (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank You! --Gampe (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Hakjosef

Ahoj, to je spíš na rychlé nebo hromadné smazání. Já jsem na rychlé smazání označil ty tři obrazy od Maxe Švabinského a Hakjosefa upozornil dvakrát na české Wikipedii (tam ho kdyžtak můžu zablokovat). Gumruch (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Uvažoval jsem rovněž o "speedy", ale pak použil "deletion", co kdyby to svolení opravdu měl... to se už i stalo, že jsem ospídoval soubory skutečnému dědici a ten se pak naštval a přestal s wiki spolupracovat. --Gampe (talk) 15:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Hups, nevšiml jsem si téhle diskuse. Já to zrovna všechno smazal. Hakjosef uploaduje ty soubory páté přes deváte od různých autorů, podle mě je jen mizivá šance, že by to svolení měl. Vypadá to na fotky někdy z galerie. Napíšu mu. Pěkný den oběma, --Podzemnik (talk) 15:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The fortress church of St. Mary of Mercy in Vrboska (6729).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 21:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Gampe,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

einschönes neues Jahr

Hallo Gampe, ich hoffe, dass du die Feiertage gut verbracht hast - ich wünsche dir ein schönes neues Jahr 2020. liebe grüße aus Wien K@rl (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka J5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka J1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka C5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madona z Těrlicka C1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7217).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7213).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Maria Theresa in Prague (7237).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Způsob zakládání kategorií

Ahoj, co se týče těch kategorií, díky, že sis toho všiml a Category:Tržní (Kaplice) založil. Většinou při větších uploadech k souborům dávám názvy kategorií různé (podle ulic). Pak si založím jejich přehled a doplňuji ty, které jsou červené. Příklad hotového přehledu je třeba tady. Vypadá to, že mi u Kaplice jedna unikla. Jen pro zajímavost :-) Aktron (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Mně je to jasné, ale měřím všem stejným metrem. :-) --Gampe (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Augustin Kovařík.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Augustin Kovařík.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

I think your edit is wrong because the picture has a definite author.SD hehua (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Do you see any author's work in that file? Gampe (talk) 11:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Augustin Kovařík.jpg

Hallo Gampe, many thanks for your note on this picture, so I take a notice for this people and I wrote so an article regiowiki:Augustin Kovařík to have a connection to the czech article ;-) --regards -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Textilka 4 C.k. budova.jpg:

Ahoj, děkuji za opravu ĺicence u obrázku. User:Bohemianroots

Bohemianroots (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Rádo se stalo. Gampe (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

ETR 480 008 BAC Pendolino (Eurostar)

Dobrý den, u jednoho ze souborů, který jsem nahrál na Wikimedia Commons a vy jste soubor ověřoval v OTRS chybí nálepka File:ETR 480 008 BAC Pendolino (Eurostar), Civitavecchia railway station 25. 8. 2000 (Italy).webm. Je to maličkost, ale někdo si může všimnout výstražného trojúhelníku namísto nálepky a může nastat zmatek. Čtenář si bude myslet, že soubor nebyl ověřen a do historie souboru se nepodívá. Nebo je problém se souborem? Hezký den. --Edwin Tangen (talk) 11:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Dobrý den, děkuji za upozornění, napravil jsem. Gampe (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ollmütz COSK 1833.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ollmütz COSK 1833.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ollmütz COSK 1833.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Ollmütz COSK 1833-centrum.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Osobní fotografie

Zdravím. Pro smazání osobních fotografií anonymních nebo nevýznamných osob není třeba zakládat diskusi o smazání, ale je vhodnější navrhnout rychlé smazání šablonou {{SD}} s parametrem F10, případně přímou šablonou {{SDF10}}. Zejména pokud je podezření, že to je denonestující fotka osoby, která k focení nedala souhlas. ŠJů (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Best wishes for 2023

Hi Gampe, everytime I trip over images, which we made together in Varnsdorf :-) It is nice to remember to these nice adventures. :-) I wish you a good new year with much of health in 2023. regards -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:51, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Karl, thank you for your wishes, I wish you all the best in the coming year too Gampe (talk) 10:20, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Hromadný přesun do jiné kategorie

Ahoj Gampe, náhodou při hledání správného zařazení obrázku jsem narazila na Category:Balloons in the Czech Republic, v níž všechny obrázky patří do Category:Toy balloons in the Czech Republic, resp. ještě lépe by bylo přejmenovat tuto kategorii třeba na Balónková šou nebo anglický ekvivalent a nechat to pohromadě. Jestli to můžu udělat sama, prosím o radu pro příště, ale spíš to bude nějakým udělátkem... Dík. Helena Dvořáková (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Ahoj Heleno, zklamu tě, asi to nějak udělat půjde, ale já to neumím. Zkus se zeptat chytřejších nebo v hospodě. Gampe (talk) 10:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Tak už jsem to objevila a dokonce se to i naučila. Udělátko cat-a-lot to umí pěkně, může se to hodit i tobě, doporučuju. Návod je u přejmenování kategorie ve FAQ. Měj se. Helena Dvořáková (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Jan z Lány (1793-1878).jpg

Dobrý den, při nahrávání souborů na Wikimedia Commons, v tomto případě File:Jan z Lány (1793-1878).jpg, jsem bohužel nikde nenašel, pravděpodobně tedy přehlédl kolonku, kdy jsme já sám či rodina držiteli práv k něčemu, kdy již sami nevíme, kdo je původním autorem malby či fotografie, je to ve vlastnictví rodiny a originály jsou v těchto případech uloženy v rodinném archivu doma a částečně některé svěřeny do "Rodinného fondu Lány" archivu Národního muzea v Praze a zároveň doba ochrany autorských práv již vypršela. Tudíž jsem se řídil radou "Průvodce načítáním souborů" - tedy, že mohu "načíst vlastní fotografie starších uměleckých děl...". Nicméně zároveň jsme stále vlastníky originálů a veškeré kopie, které jsou na internetu k dispozici, jsou jen kopie z těchto originálů, nebo kopie z knih, ke kterým dala rodina v minulosti souhlas. Dnes již k uplynulé lhůtě není souhlas stejně potřeba, je to tzv. volné dílo. Při uvedení, že se jedná o vlastní dílo, jsem tím tedy myslel vlastní kopii něčeho, k čemu mám já sám práva, nebo již práva pominula a jsou volně šiřitelná, avšak vlastním originál. Při dalším vkládání obrázků se tedy pečlivěji podívám, kam se tato situace má uvést a děkuji za upozornění. Jacobus~cswiki (talk) 08:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Karel Váňa

Ahoj, jako tip – do Category:Photographs by Karel Váňa by se dalo nahrát hafo fotek z jeho stránky v Archivu Národního divadla, jak je tam správně uvedeno, „zachytil celou svou generaci herců ND“. Nevím, jestli z GLAMu někdo s archivem komunikuje, aby bylo možno dostat fotografie ve větším rozměru a nemuselo se to brát tak poloilegálně (byť zřejmě oprávněně, když je vše PD-Old). Tak píšu a ještě dávám na vědomí @Eva Vele (WMCZ) and David Sedlecký: –Gumruch (talk) 11:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Ahoj, jsem v kontaktu s AND, požádám o oficiální uvolnění vybraných fotek v kategorii PD-Old z archivu Karla Váni, které jsou v AND, ale až po divadelních prázdninách, teď už to nestihneme. Díky za námět, zdraví--David Sedlecký (talk) 08:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Možná by šlo domluvit se také v rámci spolupráce s MLP s jejich divadelním oddělením... Gampe (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Ahoj, vracím se k záležitosti fotografií Karla Váni z prostředí Národního divadla. Po projednání záležitosti s Divadelním archivem Národního divadla sděluji: „Pan Karel Váňa pořizoval fotografie jako dlouholetý člen souboru ND a jeho fotografie tvoří podstatnou a cennou část sbírek Divadelního archivu ND. Originály a zdroje jsou majetkem ND a jako takové jsou pro publikační účely zpoplatněné. Se zájemci o publikování fotek archiv vždy individuálně projedná podmínky poskytnutí příslušné fotografie ve vyšší kvalitě. Pro veřejnost jsou fotografie běžně k nahlédnutí na webu archivu, na který je i odkaz na Wiki stránce pana K. Váni. Významný fond fotografií K. Váni je uložen i v Divadelním oddělení Národního muzea, které k jejich použití přistupuje obdobně, patrně další fotografie budou i v jiných paměťových institucích.“ Zdraví--David Sedlecký (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

@David SedleckýAhoj, děkuji za pozornost, se kterou se tomuto tématu věnuješ. Karel Váňa zemřel v roce 1951, takže jeho díla jsou z pohledu Wikimedia Commons volná. Samozřejmě má Archiv ND právo na nich "sedět", ale pokud je někdo najde někde jinde, mají smůlu. Opakuji: nejlepší řešení je domluvit se. Napadají mě další paralely z českého prostředí, až se vrátím z dovolené, ozvu se. Gampe (talk) 11:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Metadata = Uganda and similar rock art on the British Museum website.

You commented on my talk page here: User talk:Ooligan#Skrytotěl vágnerův about your reverting of my edit here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ASkrytotěl_Vágnerův.jpg&diff=790374104&oldid=790280488

This file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skrytotěl_Vágnerův.jpg has metadata from the camera location coordinates here:

"Latitude 1° 38′ 21.6″ N Longitude 34° 33′ 46.79″ E"

This latitude/ longitude converts to: 1.6393333° N, 34.562997° E - which is Uganda

This part of Uganda is within or near the Pian Upe Wildlife Reserve here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pian_Upe_Wildlife_Reserve

You wrote, "Nor is there any evidence that the photograph is from Uganda or anywhere else."

The British Museum website has information on the "Rock Art in Uganda" here: https://africanrockart.britishmuseum.org/country/uganda/ These photos are similar to this file. The Commons has some more Uganda rock art photos here: Category:Rock art in Uganda

You also wrote, "This is an experiment (hoax), there is no source on this topic." This appears to not be a "hoax" and not an "experiment." The "source" is given as "own work" by this User and it is their only file uploaded, so I am "assuming good faith."

The file name could be renamed to be more accurate, however this file is educational, useful and not "Out of Scope" per COM:OOS -- Ooligan (talk) 08:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

@Ooligan Thanks for the explanation. But "Skrytotěl Vágnerův" is nonsense, an experiment, a joke. Nothing like that exists in Czech language. The uploader is a joker who has never done any meaningful editing or provided any source. I can edit coordinates in EXIF in a few seconds, that's not an argument. If you can describe what is actually shown on the photo and if you can give it a meaningful name, then please do it. But I'm a little afraid that it won't end up like here Gampe (talk) 08:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6578).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6541).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6581).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6591).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6583).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former St. Mark's Church, Hvar (6586).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
2. Go to your preferences
3. Scroll down to Email Options
4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
5. Click Save

Re: User talk:Novohospodska

No hard evidence is required for previously unpublished images which are high-res with EXIF. Anyone can choose whatever username they want and claim whoever they want as the named author, and we would be none the wiser. (For example, they could take a photo that is actually someone else's work and put their own username as the author, and it is simply impossible for us to differentiate this case from when the uploader is telling the truth.) An unwritten corollary of COM:AGF and COM:PCP is this: If we are not sure if a user is telling the truth, but we have exhausted all means by which the legitimate author can prove their authorship in a way that is difficult to fake, then assume they are telling the truth.

What do you think asking for COM:VRT accomplished here? At VRT we are perfectly willing to accept a permission statement from a random unverified email address because again, the images are previously unpublished and high-res with EXIF. If someone really was trying to fool us, it is just as easy to create an email address as a Commons account. All you're doing here is potentially causing images uploaded in good faith to be deleted (e.g. if the uploader doesn't check their account within a week of the tagging). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

@King of Hearts Hi King of Hearts,

1. Novohospodska: the misunderstanding has been cleared up, we are coworking with the author.

2. General: I follow the Commons:Media needing categories (Czech description) page and every week I find photos uploaded there without the consent of the real author. They are usually beginners who have not understood the principle of free licenses. Some out of ignorance, some on purpose. I notify them not only on the discussion user page, but also by email if possible. I think it is not good to tolerate this. I understand that it is possible to create a fake consent to publish, but then the burden of proof is on the author of the consent side, not the Commons users. Gampe (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Saint Wenceslas Fountain in Semily

Category:Saint Wenceslas Fountain in Semily has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Saint Wenceslas Fountain in Semily This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting transclusion, {{Delete2}}, and notice to the page creators. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Hotel Hybernia 1997 (1).jpg

File:Hotel Hybernia 1997 (1).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hotel Hybernia 1997 (1).jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

H8d8u3ie (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hvar Gornja vrata (6572).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hvar Gornja vrata (6575).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Description could be more precise and the cable(?) is unfortunate, but overall good enough --MB-one 13:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Popisek obrázku

Měl bych dotaz k téhle editaci . Uvádíte popisek obrázku "Podobizna sourozenců Siblingových", s tím, že název souboru je "Dvorak_The_Siblings.jpg". Víte opravdu, že to byli sourozenci "Siblingovi"? Původnímu anglickému názvu "The Siblings", by spíš odpovídal obecný název obrazu "Sourozenci". Jik jik (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Editujte s odvahou! Gampe (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Myslím že s odvahou i edituji, ale pokud si nejsem jistý, tak se raději zeptám. A o tomhle obrazu nic prostě nevím, jen že mi ten název přišel dost podivný. Ale nemohu vyloučit, že nemůže být správný (třeba nějaká slovní hříčka autora)? Jik jik (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

upravil jsem Gampe (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Nova Cinema 2024.png

Hi, This is in the public domain. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy new year

Hi Gampe, I can see, you have not other to do like Wiki :-) - so I wish you a happy new year 2025 an much of health, this is the most important, all we will be older :-) - regards from Austria -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 15:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Potvrzení o svolení

Dobrý den, navrhl jste na smazání soubory File:Souhlas-s-uveřejněním-fotografie-M-Červenka-aktuální.pdf, File:Martin Maleček - foto souhlas.pdf a File:Jan-Picka-souhlas.pdf (viz diskuse Commons:Deletion requests/File:Souhlas-s-uveřejněním-fotografie-M-Červenka-aktuální.pdf, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Martin Maleček - foto souhlas.pdf a Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jan-Picka-souhlas.pdf).

Kvůli tomu jsou ovšem nyní bez svolení obrázky File:Červenka-Michal-Kraslice-b.jpg, File:Maleček-Martin-Hroznětín-b.jpg, File:Picka-Jan-Sokolov.jpg. Uživatelka User:Kováčová Miriam ovšem psala, že svolení o uvolnění zašle (konkrétně to psala 18. listopadu 2024, viz diskusi). Mohl byste se prosím podívat, zda svolení dorazila, a případně je k souborům přidat? Děkuji. Marek Genius (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

@Marek Genius Rozlišujme dvě věci: svolení autora, zaslané na adresu VRT a printscreen svolení, nahraný na Commons. První varianta je správně, druhá je špatně. Gampe (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Nevím, mně se to zdá trochu jako byrokracie, z faktického hlediska je podle mě jedno, kam to uživatel nahraje, naopak nahrání na Commons má výhodu v tom, že jej může ověřit kterýkoliv uživatel, tedy i nečlen VRT. Nebo má e-mail nějaké výhody? Že je známa e-mailová adresa? Připojení zaručeného elektronického podpisu? Ale většina lidí to asi posílá bez zaručeného elektronického podpisu… Nicméně to je vlastně jedno, protože uživatelce jsem psal, aby potvrzení zaslala e-mailem, a dne 18. 11. 2024 odpověděla, že potvrzení e-mailem zašle. Ovšem u obrázků nejsou připojena. Proto se tedy ptám, zda na e-mail týmu VRT dorazila? --Marek Genius (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

@Marek Genius Jedno to není, souhlasy z mnoha důvodů nejsou veřejné. Prosím řiďte se nápovědou zde. Zítra se pokusím svolení zpětně dohledat a dám vám vědět. Gampe (talk) 19:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Velmi za to děkuji. Marek Genius (talk) 22:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Vyřešeno. Gampe (talk) 06:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krásný Dvůr Gloriet (4777).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 18:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krásný Dvůr Neo-Gothic temple (4784).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

fotky Studio SIN

ahoj, určitě to má být licence screenshot mapy.cz? RomanM82 (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

@RomanM82 Určitě ne, opravím Gampe (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení IV (5111).jpg

Copyright status: File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení IV (5111).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení IV (5111).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení VI (5126).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení X (5182).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení XIII (5251).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení II (5073).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení IV (5116).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení VI (5130).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení X (5185).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení XIV (5258).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení II (5074).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení IX (5170).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení VII (5135).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení X (5187).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení XIV (5266).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení II (5078).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení IX (5176).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení VII (5141).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení XI (5194).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení XIV (5271).jpg
• File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení II (5083).jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning, solved out Gampe (talk) 06:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení III (5095).jpg

Copyright status: File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení III (5095).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Křížová cesta Vyskeř, zastavení III (5095).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mural Milada (5542).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:09, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mural Milada (5536).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-32.jpg

Copyright status: File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-32.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-32.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-41.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-06.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-16.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-25.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-33.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-42.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-07.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-18.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-26.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-34.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-43.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-08.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-19.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-35.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-44.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-01.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-09.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-20.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-27.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-24.jpg

Copyright status: File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-24.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-24.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-38.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-05.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-10.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-40.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-12.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-28.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-45.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-13.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-29.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-46.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-14.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-30.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-47.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-21.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-31.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-02.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-22.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-36.jpg
• File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-03.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ZioNicco (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

@ZioNicco Dear ZioNicco, I see a clear free license there. But if you don't like it, feel free to delete the file. I won't be sorry, but it will be a shame for the Wikipedia project. Sincerely Gampe (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

here the problem is the inconsistency between license and author, if the author is really the one indicated, pd-italia is not suitable, if instead it is a scan of some book a source would be needed ZioNicco (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg

File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Krd 11:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 27 September 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

Copyright status: File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-68.jpg

Copyright status: File:Romanian Army in the fight for the liberation of Czechoslovakia-68.jpg