★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Elisabeth church in Chorzów, front view. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful & Used --Pierre André (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:40, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
It's a pleasure working with you. You've made a big difference to VI. Your feedback is very helpful. I'd like to offer one suggestion: your images are a bit somber; perhaps you could add a touch more color and light.
Happy holidays to you and your family.Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:17, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy holidays and best wishes for 2026!
✨ Happy Holidays Gower! 🎄 Merry Christmas! 🎉 Best wishes for 2026!
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 49A building in Gdańsk, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Question why is this worth a VI scope please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: It's cultural heritage monument in Poland. It's the highest rank of listed historical buildings except "monument of history" (Pomnik historii) in Poland, which is rarely used. --Gower (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
@Pierre André Leclercq: your proposal is outside suggested scope, I wrote clearly that the scope is interior of that building… --Gower (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 19 Poniatowskiego Street in Katowice, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 4 Kasprowicza Square in Katowice, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:51, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Nicholas church in Tarnowskie Góry, front view. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church of SS. Peter and Paul in Katowice, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 22 Wolności Square in Puck, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
heylenny (talk/edits) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 15:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Manor in Jarnołtówek, front view. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church of St. John in Siewierz, front view. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 22 Market Square in Siewierz, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 6-8 3 Maja Street in Katowice, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:25, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 5 Bydgoska Street in Toruń, view from the south. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Ossuary at Saint James church fence in Toruń, view from the east. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church of St. Paul in Ruda Śląska, view from the west. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JackyM59 22:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 17 Wolności Square in Puck, facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Hedwig church in Ziemięcice, view from the west. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Art Palace in Kraków, southeastern facade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 5 Bankowa Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Distortion from lens used is too great. Can you correct? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment@Charlesjsharp: I tried to capture whole façade with wide-angle lens (11 mm), but I don't know how to correct it differently, if you can guide me, I can try it --Gower (talk) 22:01, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Not my expertise but I guess there are tools in Photoshop/Lightroom. 11mm is a tough choice for this sort of image where EV is important. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:24, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Holy Trinity church in Wodzisław Śląski, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Distortion from lens used is too great. Can you correct? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 7 Bałtycka Street in Hel, view from the west. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport A well-taken photo of a post-industrial monument. High quality. Gabriel3 16:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Methodist church in Wrocław, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 30 Warszawska Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Pentecostal church in Prudnik, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pangalau 15:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pangalau 15:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pangalau 15:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Signalling mast in Hel. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment The two bright artifacts in the upper left corner are very distracting. They are very easy to remove.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment@Archaeodontosaurus: thanks, Done, flares removed. Hot it looks now? --Gower (talk) 09:26, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 10:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Calf shed, slaughterhouse in Szczecin, view from the southwest. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Great Mill in Gdańsk, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Chapel in Kozłowa Góra, Piekary Śląskie, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 22:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 88 Wiejska Street in Hel, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:11, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 86 Wiejska Street in Hel, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 33 Wojewódzka Street in Katowice, old part, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Former fishing port complex of Hel. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
@Igor123121: , thanks for the review, but remember to change the status manually (in source code) to supported when adding reviews in the future --Gower (talk) 09:28, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 80 Stanisława Witczaka Street in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Building of the Jagiellonian Library, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:19, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Dugout of Hel Lighthouse, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 38 Francuska Street in Katowice, view from the southwest. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in ScopeEarth605 (talk) 18:08, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of Saint Bartholomew church in Chęciny, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 15-17 2 Czerwca Square in Chęciny, front view. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Useful and used --Igor123121 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Useful and used --Igor123121 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Silesian Theatre – interior, auditorium. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Useful and used --Igor123121 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Synagogue in Chęciny, view from the south in 2022 before restoration. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
This building does not date from 1638. The scope should indicate '2022 before restoration'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
@Charlesjsharp: scope changed, anyway it was built in 17th century, thanks for your attention. --Gower (talk) 08:38, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support It seems 17th Century building was largely replaced. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 7 Henryka Dąbrowskiego Street in Chorzów, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 36 Władysława Łokietka Street in Chęciny, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Usefull and used. --Igor123121 (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Supersam in Katowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Anthony of Padua rectory in Chorzów – exterior, view from the west. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Hyacinth church in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of courthouse in Bytom, courtyard. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Usefull and used. --Igor123121 (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of Holy Cross church in Bytom, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of Saint Barbara church in Gliwice, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used. --Igor123121 (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Leonard chapel in Chęciny, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Tar container in Ruda Śląska before restoration. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 36 Władysława Łokietka Street in Chęciny, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Margaret of Antioch church in Bytom, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used --Igor123121 (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of Holy Spirit Church in Bytom, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:35, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Pretty belfry --JackyM59 11:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St. Hedwig's Church in Zabrze, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Anthony chapel in Piekary Śląskie, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Seed shelling plant storehouse in Zwierzyniec, interior, third floor. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Habsburg Palace in Rajcza, exterior, view from the south. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Lasocki Palace in Kraków, exterior, view from the south. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Seed shelling plant in Zwierzyniec, interior, first floor. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:45, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 16a combat bunker in Świętochłowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Workshop at Rudy Railway Museum, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 22 Dworcowa Street in Bytom, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 12:13, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Palace in Tworóg, southeastern façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 16 Dworcowa Street in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 12:14, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 25 Strzelców Bytomskich Street in Bytom, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Usefull and used --Ercé (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Holy Cross church in Bytom-Miechowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 21 Market Square in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 5 Mariacka Street in Bytom, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 12 Market Square in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 20 Market Square in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 13:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 19 Jainty Street in Bytom, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
@Agnes Monkelbaan: thanks for the vote but could you sign? Unfortunately, unsigned votes don't count. (Bedankt voor je stem. Kun je tekenen? Stemmen zonder handtekening tellen helaas niet mee.) --Gower (talk) 09:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 40 3 Maja Street in Katowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:33, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 13 Dworcowa Street in Katowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 6 Korfantego Street in Katowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and widely used, best image in scope showing the whole building. --August (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 2 Jana Matejki Street in Katowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 4 Moniuszki Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 26 Mickiewicza Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope, useful and used. --Aciarium (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:46, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 13 Stawowa Street in Katowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:25, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 2 Sokolska Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:23, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 45 Warszawska Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 10:05, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 11 Wolności Square in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used. ---Pierre André (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 12 Wolności Square in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 10A Wolności Square in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 57 Warszawska Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:15, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 7 Pocztowa Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope, well-lit --Aciarium (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 6 Bogucicka street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope. --Aciarium (talk) 16:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
@Aciarium: Please Change to supported, opposed or discussed as appropriate when adding reviews--Pierre André (talk) 22:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Kino Gloria cinema, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope, useful and used. --Aciarium (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
@Aciarium: Please Change to supported, opposed or discussed as appropriate when adding reviews --Pierre André (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 3 Piastowska Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevskytalk 20:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Sacred Heart church in Mysłowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Jurand shaft II winding engine house, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:40, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: September Scouts Monument, Katowice, designed by Zygmunt Brachmański, front view. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
VI but artist name should be in scope Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: done, I didn't think that it's obligatory --Gower (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Should be. It has always been the custom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of Holy Trinity church in Rudziczka, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment The description/caption should specify the interior and view. Otherwise it is VI. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Tagooty: I don't understand. Interior and view are specified. --Gower (talk) 15:32, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
The Summary/Description and Caption in the image page only state "Rudziczka, Holy Trinity church". Interior to be added. --Tagooty (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
thanks, done --Gower (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church of St. John in Siewierz, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Wojciech bridge in Zabrze. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Siemianowice III shaft winding tower in Siemianowice Śląskie, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Siemianowice Śląskie Town Hall, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Rheinbaben Palace in Siemianowice Śląskie – exterior, southern façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Huta Pokój gate II building, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St. John the Baptist church in Zabrze, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Euura miliaris (Army Willow Nematine), larva. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Gardener's house in Siemianowice Śląskie, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Water tower in Brynek, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used --Igor123121 (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsThe close wall is a bit disturbing but the pear sharpness is ok to me. --Selbymay 19:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: W Kielnikach Cave in Olsztyn, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Cave with own Wikipedia article, mentioned in scientific literature.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Solna Jama cave in Gniewoszów, interior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment This is the best picture of this cave, so the scope shouldn't be so specific. I think "cave in Gniewoszów" is sufficient. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:45, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
@Kiril Simeonovski: , okay, done, thanks. I kept 'interior' because of possible scope for entrance --Gower (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks good now. Best in scope. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Palace in Jarząbkowice, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment The color of the sky is really very strange. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
I think this would be an issue if it were nominated for QI, but it still illustrates the given scope very well — I don't have the feeling that the building's colors are somewhat altered. Best in Scope. --Aciarium (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The sky anomaly is too strong --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Support We are not at QIC. Best in scope. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Pawłowice Palace, Wrocław, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Used and useful, well-captured with nice light. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment The color of the sky is really very strange. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment maybe it was taken with polarizing filter or grey filter? --Gower (talk) 13:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, I am convinced that this is the origin of the problem, It's a real shame.--Archaeodontosaurus (
talk) 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Support We are not at QIC. Best in scope. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Palace in Krotoszyn, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment The color of the sky is really very strange. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
I assume the very dark sky is due to the (clearly overdone) utilization of a polarizing filter. To me, the nominated image still illustrates the given scope very well. Since the only other image in the scope also has an unnatural sky, and shows the building at an angle, I would say this is Best in Scope. --Aciarium (talk) 16:23, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The sky anomaly is too strong --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Support We are not at QIC. Best in scope. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Best in Scope --Igor123121 (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Joseph church in Ruda Śląska, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Železná brána, view from the south. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Western facade of the Łańcut Castle in Łańcut. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 15 Wały Generała Sikorskiego in Toruń, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 13:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 26 Piastowska Street in Prudnik, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Jewish cemetery in Głogówek. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Clock tower of IV Lyceum in Bytom. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Hi Gower, I hope you are doing well! I just wanted to let you know that I added the geocode as you requested. Perhaps you wanted this added before voting one way or another? Thank you for your time and have a nice week-end! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:04, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Dorothy church in Będzin, interior, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Support Best in scope. The only one. --JackyM59 (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Orthodox church in Sosnowiec, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope Superb monument in beautiful light. And used. -- JackyM59 (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please note that the 'Status' field must be filled in correctly. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Interior of Sosnowiec Cathedral, view towards the organ loft. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Dom Handlowy Zenit, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope and used
@JackyM59: thanks but sign it, please --Gower (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Best in Scope and used -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:41, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Liptovské Revúce kościół burza 2025.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St. Hedwig's Church, Chorzów, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope and used -- JackyM59 (talk) 14:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church in Liptovské Revúce – exterior, view from the south. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Comment Please add the direction of the view in the scope as this picture from a different perspective is also useful. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church in Liptovské Revúce – interior, view towards the main altar. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope Magnificent decoration and colors. -- JackyM59 (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
5 днів до завершення Місячника ілюстрування української природи у 2026 році — встигніть долучитися!
Перейдіть до сторінки кампанії
5 днів до завершення Місячника ілюстрування української природи у 2026 році — встигніть долучитися до 10 березня включно!⏳🌿
Місячник ілюстрування української природи — це проєкт, присвячений ілюструванню української Вікіпедії та Вікіданих світлинами з фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю» і триває він з 10 лютого до 10 березня 2026 року.
Семеро активних учасників та учасниць вже протягом майже місяця опрацьовують десятки і сотні статей Вікіпедії та елементів Вікіданих.
Зробіть свій внесок і ви!
Щоб стати учасником чи учасницею кампанії, нагадуємо:
1️⃣проілюструйте принаймні одну статтю української Вікіпедії чи один елемент Вікіданих фотографією з фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю»;
2️⃣додайте себе у розділ «Учасники та внесок» на сторінці проєкту;
3️⃣регулярно додавайте свій внесок у той розділ згідно із системою балів.
5 найактивніших учасників та учасниць конкурсу отримають цінні призи від організаторів — сертифікати інтернет-магазинів. Усі учасники й учасниці також зможуть отримати офіційний сертифікат участі від «Вікімедіа Україна» та сувеніри.
🔎Детальніше про Місячник ілюстрування української природи шукайте на сторінці кампанії.
Якщо маєте запитання чи ідеї, пишіть нам за адресою wle@wikimedia.org.ua
Ви отримали це повідомлення, адже брали участь у «Вікі любить Землю» раніше. Якщо Ви не хочете отримувати сповіщення, пов'язані з «Вікі любить Землю» — додайте свою сторінку користувача до цієї категорії або напишіть організаційній команді конкурсу.
-- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».14:14, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Roadside chapel "u Koconia" in Ujsoły, exterior. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Cutlass 21:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Cutlass 21:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Cutlass 21:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Вікі любить фольклор 2026: завантажуйте фото, відео та аудіо нематеріальної культурної спадщини України!
Цікавитеся традиціями та маєте фото чи відео народних святкувань, танців, записи співів чи майстрів традиційних мистецтв за роботою? Тоді запрошуємо до конкурсу «Вікі любить фольклор»!
З 1 лютого по 31 березня 2026 року завантажуйте світлини, відео та аудіо нематеріальної культурної спадщини у Вікісховище та долучайтеся до її популяризації.
«Вікі любить фольклор» — це міжнародний конкурс, метою якого є документування народних традицій, вбрання, танців, співів, святкувань та обрядів, щоб наповнити Вікіпедію якісними зображеннями для ілюстрування статей. Щоб взяти участь, перейдіть на сторінку «Вікі любить фольклор».
П'ять найкращих світлин отримають цінні призи та сувеніри на українському етапі конкурсу.
Три учасники чи учасниці, які своїми фото проілюструють найбільше статей Вікіпедії та інших вікіпроєктів, також отримають призи в українській частині конкурсу. Всі фото, відео та аудіо будуть брати участь у міжнародному змаганні.
Важливо! Для участі в конкурсі необхідно вказати детальний опис фольклорної цінності матеріалів (назва події чи обряду, хто виконує/бере участь, місце, дата тощо).
Також з 1 лютого по 31 березня проходить конкурс статей «Фемінізм та фольклор 2026» — щорічна міжнародна ініціатива у межах кампанії «Вікі любить фольклор», що спрямована на висвітлення культурного розмаїття та гендерної інклюзивності у Вікіпедії.
Долучайтеся до конкурсу та допоможіть зберегти українську культурну спадщину для майбутніх поколінь!
Українська частина конкурсу відбувається за підтримки ГО «Вікімедіа Україна».
Ви отримали це повідомлення, бо брали участь у фотоконкурсах раніше. Якщо не хочете більше отримувати сповіщення про цей конкурс, напишіть мені
--Олена Вінсент [ВМУА](від імені організаційної команди конкурсу) 14:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saint Mary of Help church in Katowice – exterior, view from the northwest. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope and used-- JackyM59 (talk) 08:34, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 87 Markiefki Street in Katowice, façade. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Best in Scope and used. The drone gives a detailed photo. It's useful for taking a step back but it shouldn't be easy to frame... -- JackyM59 (talk) 08:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bottom crop is not very good. Also vignetting a bit. --Екатерина Борисова 02:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I don't notice significant vignetting, only sky gradient. The bottom crop is the result of the fact that there are tin shacks with shops at the bottom, which I wanted to avoid --Gower 18:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC) Info There has been no vote here. Please do not set anything to "/Discuss" without a vote with which you disagree. Please discuss here. Image was reset to "/Nomination". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC) IMO you can crop or retouch these shacks roofs. And it would be nice to darken that white car in the center a little. It attracts attention, but it's completely blown out. --Екатерина Борисова 00:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC) Екатерина Борисова thanks, new version uploaded with retouched roofs and darkened car. How it looks now? --Gower 21:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Support Looks better now, thanks There're still some parts of objects in the bottom like utility poles and signs, but they're look natural and not disturbing IMO. --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Church of SS. Peter and Paul in Piekary Śląskie – exterior, view from the south. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Jak kadrujesz zdjęcie, do którego wcześniej była dosłana zgoda na VTR to nie ma potrzeby uzyskiwać ekstra zgodę na przekadrowanie. Wtedy w opisie zdjęcie podajesz informację, że to przekadrowane zdjęcie X, w polu autor podajesz autora pracy oryginalnej oraz siebie jako autora przekadrowania i sprawa załatwiona. Polimerek (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
@Polimerek wiem, że nie ma potrzeby uzyskiwać ekstra zgody na przekadrowanie, ale ja to wykadrowałem, zanim wstawiłeś zgodę do pierwotnego zdjęcia, a ja nie mam uprawnień, żeby to wstawić do pliku. Gower (talk) 09:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Autorka w programie radiowym Artura Andrusa emitowanym w RMF Classic zgłosiła prośbę o zmianę zajęcia. ~2026-22524-03 (talk) 08:13, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
@~2026-22524-03 no to niech załaduje lepsze to zmienimy Gower (talk) 08:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Thank you for all these useful and high-quality images. Thank you for the help provided to beginners on QI and VI. JackyM59 (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
--Tagooty (talk) 15:26, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_interior_2022.jpg)
_NW_2022.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_ID_597071.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_interior_2022.jpg){kind=link}
_NW_2022.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_ID_597071.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
