FM promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:Sharp Eye Oceania December 2024 children's edition Medium Quality pdf 22MB.pdf, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Sharp Eye Oceania December 2024 children's edition Medium Quality pdf 22MB.pdf, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

Cart (talk) 14:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

FM promotion

★ This file has been promoted to Featured media! ★ The file File:A Sharp Eye on Butterflies of Ghana.pdf, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:A Sharp Eye on Butterflies of Ghana.pdf. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Tvpuppy (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

New tool to help evaluate images

I've been working on this tool to help the review process in FPC, and would like to hear the opinion of perhaps the user with the best photo critiques. I'm open to any feedback, no matter what it is, and you can ask me to add anything that might help in the evaluation process, even if you think it might be complex. Thank you.

How to try it?

Add this to your Special:MyPage/common.js:

mw.loader.load( '/w/index.php?title=User:Wilfredor/fpc-voter.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' );

Thanks again Wilfredor (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

I'd love to try it Wilfredor , but cannot understand what to doǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

This tool places an information box next to each image in FPC. In addition to evaluating a series of checks (visible via the "fp-ready" button), you can also add notes to an image using the "add note" button and view them directly in FPC. It also includes a magnifying glass tool, eliminating the need to open the entire image to assess its quality. The information box displays details such as the wikis where the image is used, author information regarding frame rate and ranking, effective pixels, whether the image has geotagging, whether the image was captured within the sensor size and maximum resolution range, and whether the lens was appropriately selected for the type of photography. Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

just add this line:

mw.loader.load( '/w/index.php?title=User:Wilfredor/fpc-voter.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' );

to

Special:MyPage/common.js Wilfredor (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green metalwing (Neurobasis chinensis) male Pak Long.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 19:47, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green metalwing (Neurobasis chinensis) female Kuang Si.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 19:47, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spine-legged redbolt (Rhodothemis rufa) female Saigon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 19:47, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spine-legged redbolt (Rhodothemis rufa) male Saigon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 July 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rufous-legged grasshopper (Xenocatantops humilis) Pak Long.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 11:44, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macracantha hasselti (Hasselt's spiny spider) ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2026 (UTC)