User talk:XRay
This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.
This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:XRay.
This is the user talk page of XRay, where you can send messages and comments to XRay.
- Be polite.
- Be friendly.
- Assume good faith.
- No personal attacks.
- Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (
~~~~) at the end. - Put new text under old text.
- New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
- Click here to start a new topic.
 | Es gibt Dinge, über die ich nicht mehr diskutieren möchte:
Zu meiner Vorgehensweise: Best practice (deutsch). Und es sei erwähnt, dass ich gleichartige und eher langweilige Änderungen mit einem Bot erledige. So manche in den Augen des Betrachters sinnlose Änderung einfacher Natur wird automatisch irgendwann wieder rückgängig gemacht, sinnvoll erscheinende oder immer wieder durch Dritte aus meiner Sicht eher unwichtige Änderungen werden von mir im Bot aufgenommen, so dass alle meine Bilder davon profitieren. |
|
|
Category:Sunrises_by_year
 |
Sunrises by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Prototyperspective (talk) 12:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion (01 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Mittelbau -- 2026 -- 0532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Kettelersche Doppelkurie -- 2026 -- 0566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Hollenbeckerstraße 30, Relief des Erzengels Michael -- 2026 -- 0579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nordflügel -- 2026 -- 0520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Stadthaus 1, Magnolie -- 2026 -- 0561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Antiquariat Solder, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, DS Techeetah -- 2019 -- 5502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (02 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Mittelbau -- 2026 -- 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Hollenbeckerstraße -- 2026 -- 0575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Antiquariat Solder, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Hollenbeckerstraße 24, Feng-Shui-Bagua-Spiegel -- 2026 -- 0573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Mercedes-Benz EQC -- 2019 -- 5538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (03 April 2026)
![](./File:Münster,_LWL-Museum_für_Kunst_und_Kultur,_Lichtkunstwerk_"Silberne_Frequenz"_--_2026_--_0609.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (04 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2026 -- 0626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LVM 1 und 5 -- 2026 -- 0656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Mittelbau -- 2026 -- 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![](./File:Münster,_LWL-Museum_für_Kunst_und_Kultur,_Lichtkunstwerk_"Silberne_Frequenz"_--_2026_--_0613.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (05 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Kirschbaum -- 2026 -- 0556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche, Relief -- 2026 -- 0607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (06 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Antiquariat Solder, Korkfigur -- 2026 -- 0588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Siegelkammer -- 2026 -- 0622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Schlosspark, Narzissen -- 2026 -- 0645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![](./File:Münster,_LWL-Museum_für_Kunst_und_Kultur,_Lichtkunstwerk_"Silberne_Frequenz"_--_2026_--_0614.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Special:Diff/1192454391
Why? Pleaes see what this tag says and what given category actually contains. Any text can be inscribed and depicted on images in this category. None of the images in this category contains text "Epitaphs" in particular, as claimed in this header template. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 07:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- Dear Unknown, the category is assigned to the text categories (for example text with 8 letters), and the suffix also matches the text categories. However, the content does not necessarily fit the category. -- XRay 💬 08:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- I understand this template is appropriate in some other categories with the same suffix, e.g. in Category:Hello (text) where images truely depict text "Hello". In case of Category:Epitaphs (text) however the "(text)" suffix is there for regular disambigution purpose, meaning this category is for epitaphs that are (inscribed) texts, and not for different kinds of epitaphs that are sculptural works. See also category description in category header. The content in this category fits this description as far as I can see. Disambigution text in brackets probably can be something else, too. But then again I doubt that "text" is really reserved only for {{Text cat}} categories, and you should still always check what the category actually contains before adding any such template. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- I realize there are some inconsistencies. But removing the template {{Text cat}} won't solve the problem. Content, descriptions, templates, and categories should be kept separate to resolve the issue properly. Feel free to do that. -- XRay 💬 08:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- What unresolved problem there will be if template is removed? As said, this category never was meant for images depicting eight-letter word "Epitaphs", and regular disambiguation in brackets alone doesn't indicate that category should be used for this specific purpose. No such images that you say this category should be used for even exist. This is about common sense at the end. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps I should start with a personal note: I really don’t like replying to anonymous users. I never know if the message—which takes some effort on my part—will actually reach them. As for the inconsistencies, let’s consider two things:
- According to the categorization, Category Category:Epitaphs is an “Inscription”, meaning it’s already a text. At the same time, it is also a sculpture. That doesn’t quite fit. According to Wikidata epitaph (Q13578361), it is a tomb, i.e., a sculpture.
- Category Category:Epitaphs (text) is, according to the naming scheme and categorization, a text in the English language: Category:Images by English text. It is not just any text, but specifically “Epitaphs.” Hence the categorization in Category:Text with 8 letters. The Wikidata mapping epitaph (Q1772), on the other hand, refers to the actual text of the epitaph.
- So what should be done? The Wikidata entries, category names, and categorization must be clearly separated into sculpture and text (inscription). The category Category:Epitaphs (text) is reserved for photos containing the text “Epitaphs.” If none exist, it is superfluous. Unfortunately, I’m not particularly skilled in English, but I would split it into Category:Epitaphs and Category:Epitaph inscriptions (which fits with Category:Inscriptions by dedication). The categorization would then need to be adjusted accordingly. -- XRay 💬 14:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps I should start with a personal note: I really don’t like replying to anonymous users. I never know if the message—which takes some effort on my part—will actually reach them. As for the inconsistencies, let’s consider two things:
- What unresolved problem there will be if template is removed? As said, this category never was meant for images depicting eight-letter word "Epitaphs", and regular disambiguation in brackets alone doesn't indicate that category should be used for this specific purpose. No such images that you say this category should be used for even exist. This is about common sense at the end. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- I realize there are some inconsistencies. But removing the template {{Text cat}} won't solve the problem. Content, descriptions, templates, and categories should be kept separate to resolve the issue properly. Feel free to do that. -- XRay 💬 08:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'm afraid new title "Epitaph inscriptions" isn't better than the previous one, and likely now there are more inconsistencies than before. First, texts in question, often in form of an inscription, are epitaphs (in relevant sense of the word), and so this title seems tautological. Second, it is probably inaccurate to describe all epitaph in the latter sense as inscriptions, even though English description for respective d:Q1772 item currently says so. While an epitaph (text) often is inscribed it necessarily isn't always. As per enwiki definition it is just "a short text honoring a deceased person". This category also includes several epitaph texts that are not inscribed.
- As for (previous) inconsistencies, please note that both the "English text" and "8 letters" category were added by the very same odd template. I resolved this inconsistency in the first place with the removal of this template. As for inscriptions parent category in Category:Epitaphs, yes, that was improper for epitaphs in the other sense (sculpture or other artwork) but that's not really related to the template used in the other category. In other words, this template did not and would not fit no matter in what way all inconsistencies mentioned so far are resolved. Also, categorization already was separated, you only renamed the category that is a separate category for texts.
- As for Commons conventions and as far as I can see, words in brackets are often used for disambiguation purpose, e.g. see examples in COM:DAB which I already referenced above. Just like in Wikipedia. So word "text" in brackets seemed and still seems to me as a clear disambiguation for given subject, at least more clear and less misleading than current category title. And as far as I can see, nothing forces us to add given template if it says "text" in brackets. Some other disambiguation could be used in brackets, maybe "short text" or "texts" in plural, but I'm not sure if these would be actually better than previous "text". ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 09:02, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- I can see, at least in part, that you're right. After looking around a bit, I found a category with a similar theme: Category:Ectopistes migratorius (texts). So, I'm renaming it to "(texts)". I don't know if it's really good. It's always a problem when things have certain similarities. -- XRay 💬 09:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- I understand this template is appropriate in some other categories with the same suffix, e.g. in Category:Hello (text) where images truely depict text "Hello". In case of Category:Epitaphs (text) however the "(text)" suffix is there for regular disambigution purpose, meaning this category is for epitaphs that are (inscribed) texts, and not for different kinds of epitaphs that are sculptural works. See also category description in category header. The content in this category fits this description as far as I can see. Disambigution text in brackets probably can be something else, too. But then again I doubt that "text" is really reserved only for {{Text cat}} categories, and you should still always check what the category actually contains before adding any such template. ~2026-95803-6 (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Tech News: 2026-15
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
- The CampaignEvents extension now includes a new group goal-setting feature, enabling organizers to set and track event goals such as the number of articles created and participating contributors in real time. Similarly, participants can work toward shared targets and see their collective impact as the event unfolds. The feature is now available on all Wikimedia wikis. Learn more in the documentation.
The new watchlist labels feature (announced in Tech News 2026-07) is now available via VisualEditor, the source editor, and the 'watchstar' (or watch link, for skins that don't have a star icon). Previously it was only possible to assign labels via EditWatchlist. In all three places it is a new field following the expiry field.
View all 23 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, the issue where talk pages on mobile with Parsoid are unusable after empty section headers, has now been fixed.
Updates for technical contributors
- The sub-referencing feature, which lets editors add details to an existing reference without duplicating it, will be gradually rolled out to more wikis later this year. Wikis using the Reference Tooltips gadget are encouraged to update their version (typically at MediaWiki:Gadget-ReferenceTooltips.js as shown here) to ensure compatibility. Other reference-related gadgets may also be affected.
- All Wikinews editions will be closed and switched to read-only mode on 4 May 2026. Content will remain accessible, but no new edits or articles can be added. This closure was approved by the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation following extended discussions. Read more.
- The Action API has had several formats for requested output. One of them,
format=php, is being removed soon. Please ensure your scripts or bots use the JSON format. This removal should affect very few scripts and bots. - The Special:NamespaceInfo page now includes namespace aliases. For example "WP" for the "Project" ("Wikipedia") namespace on the German Wikipedia.
- Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 16:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Category:Castles_by_year_of_photographing
|
Castles by year of photographing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:31, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion (07 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Frauenstraße, Figur -- 2026 -- 0593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (09 April 2026)
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Diözesanbibliothek -- 2026 -- 0580 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Porsche -- 2019 -- 5545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Nike -- 2026 -- 0548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Diözesanbibliothek -- 2026 -- 0580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LVM 1 und 5 -- 2026 -- 0650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2026 -- 0626 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LVM 1 und 5 -- 2026 -- 0656 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (10 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Berlin E-Prix 2019, Greentech Festival, Mercedes-Benz EQC -- 2019 -- 5536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (11 April 2026)
![](./File:Dülmen,_Intergeneratives_Zentrum_"einsA",_Treppenhaus_--_2026_--_0704-10.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Intergeneratives Zentrum "einsA", Treppenhaus -- 2026 -- 0704-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Kläranlage, Faulturm -- 2026 -- 0713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (12 April 2026)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktstraße, Absperrpoller -- 2026 -- 0669-75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktstraße, Absperrpoller -- 2026 -- 0690-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Kirschbaum -- 2026 -- 0551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion (13 April 2026)
![](./File:Münster,_LWL-Museum_für_Kunst_und_Kultur,_Lichtkunstwerk_"Silberne_Frequenz"_--_2026_--_0617.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2026 -- 0617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Tech News: 2026-16
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- Experienced editors are invited to test the Article guidance feature, designed to help less-experienced editors create well-structured, policy-compliant Wikipedia articles. Testing instructions are available. Also, after reviewing the outlines, please provide feedback on the project talk page. Based on your input, the feature will be refined and transferred to the pilot Wikipedias to translate and adapt. Check out the video explaining the feature.
Updates for editors
- On most wikis, all autoconfirmed users can now use Special:ChangeContentModel page to create new pages with custom content models, such as mass message lists, making custom page formats more accessible. Check Special:ListGroupRights for the status of your wiki.
- The Growth team has launched an account creation experiment to evaluate whether adding an account creation button to the mobile web header increases new account registrations and encourages more mobile users to contribute to the wikis. The experiment is currently live on Hindi, Indonesian, Bengali, Thai, and Hebrew Wikipedia, and targets 10% of logged-out mobile web users.
- View all 30 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, an issue where VisualEditor could get stuck loading on Windows devices with animations turned off, has now been fixed.
Updates for technical contributors
- Starting later this week, Abuse filter editors who have the Improved Syntax Highlighting beta feature enabled will have CodeMirror instead of CodeEditor as the editor at Special:AbuseFilter. This is part of the broader effort to make the user experience more consistent across all editors.
- Tools and bots that access the Notifications API (
action=query&meta=notifications) will need to update their OAuth or BotPassword grants to also include access to private notifications. - Due to a library upgrade, listings on category pages may be displayed out of order starting on Monday, 20th April. A migration script will be run to correct this, and will take hours to days depending on the size of the wiki (up to a week for English Wikipedia).
- Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 15:16, 13 April 2026 (UTC)