I just visited Cohoes, NY this afternoon. I really love that beautiful city and would like to add a photo of its city hall. Would you consider editing this photo for inclusion as a thumbnail in voy:cohoes?
Either way, thank you very much for taking so many photos of Upstate New York!
By the way, I also visited Waterford, NY, and I think that even though it's less spectacular than Cohoes, it merits a Wikivoyage article, as it has a nice historic district, the canal is interesting (I saw a lock operated early this afternoon), and I visited a noteworthy vintage items store at the corner of 3rd and Broad and the nice coffee shop with all sorts of interesting maritime artifacts and memorabilia on the walls that's catty-corner from there. I probably won't start a voy:Waterford (New York) article tonight, but soon, and if you have things to add about that town, great. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsIt seems to me that the images is slightly leaning in. There are some dust spots, too. Perhaps a bit oversaturated... Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 16:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC) I will get to it; hold on. Daniel Case 03:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Comment No problem, I've got time... as long as XRay won't interfere too early:-) --Basotxerri 17:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC) ? I'm interfering now.;-) BTW: A declined and afterwards improved image can be nominated again. --XRay 04:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC) OK, that's for the next time. Thanks. --Basotxerri 15:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Done OK, you can take another look. I also cropped it in a bit. Daniel Case 19:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Much better now, I prefer the new crop! --Basotxerri 20:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsExcellent composition at all points. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
I was able to give my little juniper project a new try today following your advice. Found a part of the bush with better background and even cheated by using a tripod. Unfortunately the light is already waning and even though I shot it at approximately the same hour as the first, I'm not sure it is enough for any higher marks. These little buggers really need some quality light to look their best, tiny as they are (the smallest ones just about 1 mm). But I'll get them some day!:) cart-Talk 22:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Just thought I'd say thanks for uploading this - I needed a photo of a red mountain for a Christmas present for my girlfriend, and this is just about perfect. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry
I over-reacted the other day at FPC. Sorry about that. We mostly agree on reviews, particularly your reviews "per Colin":-). -- Colin (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image
Hi Daniel, would you mind if I cropped part of the skyline of this image? It's being used as a panorama on an article, and it would fit better if trimmed. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
You know you spend too much time on Commons when...
Messy kitchen sink
... instead of cleaning up you see a photo op that is quite the opposite of the fridge pic. Since there are no good pics in this category, I'll nom it for QIC but I think I've filled my crazy-quota at FPC for this month with the plastic polar bear. cart-Talk 11:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are quite a few dust spots. Please fix them. -- Ikan Kekek 04:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC) DoneDaniel Case 05:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC) You got some of them, but I still see a few. For example, there's a small one above a notch in the rocks some ways down from the upper left corner, I've counted 4 in the cloud near the upper right corner, and there's one just above the left side of the tors. I think there are others, but they're very light, so it's not that easy to find them. I'm promoting this, but try to find the others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks ... I tried to get that last bunch. Daniel Case 07:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC) I'm still seeing a 2 or 3 small ones, but I'll leave you to your own devices with your hunt. 1 clear one is above an area of evergreens to the left of and higher than the tors. -- Ikan Kekek 09:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsWell composed and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC) There is a dust spot near the right margin some ways below the top and at least 2 or 3 in the upper left corner. -- Ikan Kekek 04:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC) DoneOK, I got them, plus a few more I noticed while I was at it. Daniel Case 08:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC) It's a little like Whack-a-Mole: I see 3 above the tors, each not quite in a straight line above the other(s). -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsLots of dust spots on this one, too. I think your lens needs cleaning. -- Ikan Kekek 04:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Done OK, take a look at it now. Daniel Case 08:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC) There are still 3 big spots near the top margin in the center/right, plus some smaller ones to the right and left, close to being in a line with each other. Ping me when you clean those, and I'll promote the file. -- Ikan Kekek 08:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: OK, hope I got them ... Daniel Case 19:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC) Much better. You may have gotten them all. -- Ikan Kekek 21:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
So are all of the NYC reservoirs within NY state? I hadn't known that. - Jmabel! talk 19:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the answer (on my talk page). For what it's worth, at least with me, you can always feel free to answer the question where I asked it; if in doubt you can always get someone's attention w/ {{Ping}} on the spot or {{Tb}} on their talk page. - Jmabel! talk 00:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Better?
I have added a caution-text to all of the railway pics. Example. It this ok/better/enough/in need of copy editing? cart-Talk 22:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Jee's advise
I propose that, with your permission we archive related convo to rights, neither of us are admins and I have reached to to more then one. I can place it on the talk and it does not effect the voting...If you, (as you said) like it, please vote for it and lets see if it does get tagged, lets just strike the convo as unrelated to nomination and that is the end of it, were not setting new law and or going to become some kind of publishing trend setter by discontinuing a process older then both of us.. Thanks: --Don (talk) 03:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! --cart-Talk 14:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy holidays! 2017!;)
* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevskytalk 18:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy new year!
Merry Christmas, Daniel Case!
English: Hellow Daniel Case, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Commentso.k. now for me. --Ermell 08:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Also in the picture?
Sincerely,
Agnes.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
PS; I've seen your picture. It is OK! Maybe a little grim.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsThe group does not look very cheerful, but they look good on the picture in a beautiful landscape.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, I had no idea you were planning to upload the processing I made of your photo. I thought you only wanted my opinion on how it could have looked if I fixed it. Anyway, I moved it to a more neutral name since an editor's name don't belong in the title, that should only be in the description of the file's page. In this case it could also be bewildering for the viewer since they might be looking for a cart in the photo when using the search box to find photos. --cart-Talk 09:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsI like the composition, the funny of the wikimaniacs but the faces is in shadows, I approved it by the first not the second --Ezarate 00:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
not quite my perfect example, but at least it's FP;)
Hi, I'd like to talk some more words with you about your opinion that animals blending into the background provides no wow for you personally on principle. I totally respect it, but I struggle to understand that in theory, for you, there would be no wow factor in any FPC showing animal camouflage, regardless of the novelty and interest such photographs can have (at least for me). I still would love to know from you whether you would oppose a FPC showing animals in their natural environment, perfectly obscured by camouflage alone. Let's say, the whole photo shows just desert with grass, but only on closer view you could find a dozen animals hidden in plain sight, not obscured by other objects. (I call this the "Where's Wally?" photo) Would you still oppose this? I can't and likely won't change your view on photography, but I wanted to give you imaginary examples of where I find your principle that lack of subject separation is automatically lack of wow for you too close-minded and seeming absurd considering the unique effect I think these photos can have on the viewer (and thus wowing), when seeing them in the FP gallery, wondering what is so special about a boring nature scene, but then fining the animals all well hidden from predators. Thanks in advance for your thoughts! – LucasT 07:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
@Lucasbosch: There was one nomination a while back where I thought this actually made the picture more interesting ... I shall have to find it, and I would rather do that later since it is very late here. Daniel Case (talk) 08:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I look forward to it. I understand that not all of these images are awesome, but you worded it in a way that made it sound definitive and that's what irked me – LucasT 08:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsWhile looking at the thumbnail, I thought it was oversaturated but it isn't. Great colours! There a some dust spots in the sky, could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 16:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC) DoneDaniel Case 18:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC) OK now! Thank you! --Basotxerri 19:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsNicely composed with the train, the bike riders and the cars, and nice clouds. -- Ikan Kekek 02:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsWho stole my comment? OK for QI. --A.Savin 13:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Comment The dust spots in the sky should be removed--Ermell 08:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC) @Ermell: Done Thanks for pointing them out ... really faint! Daniel Case 16:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSad thing picture, but beautiful.--Famberhorst 06:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. Ignoring the background as irrelevant. --Peulle 08:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. By occasion, youmay want to remove the dust spot to the left above the chimney --A.Savin 03:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSome of the scenery is a bit unfocused at full size, but so what? Everything is good to add up to what we see at full screen. -- Ikan Kekek 05:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport Good quality. DoF could be better. May be it's a little bit oversaturated. --XRay 17:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsComment Please straighten the verticals. --A.Savin 01:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC) DoneDaniel Case 04:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 16:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Daniel, I'm wondering whether you consider this a possible FP. It's a unique view of spectacular architectural elements that it would probably be hard to photograph without people in the photo, but would you vote for a photo that looks like this if someone else nominated it? -- Ikan Kekek 05:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsDetial could be better, but good enough for QI. --W.carter 06:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsCrop a bit tight but good quality. --W.carter 08:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsThe building is sharp is nice and sharp enough and the cables are unavoidable, but the streetlamp on the right is really ruining the pic. Do do think you could clone that out and perhaps soften the posterized lights on the cars down right? --W.carter 08:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC) @W.carter: I'll try to get to that tonight. Daniel Case 20:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Done I actually decided to get rid of the wires as well. Daniel Case 16:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC) Nice!:) Good quality. --W.carter 19:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSeems that there are slight Ca are left on the horizon, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. At first it looked a bit heavy on the blue saturation, but since the river is totally fine, I guess the light really was this way with deep colors. --W.carter 09:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Daniel Case,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
While your work is altogether really stellar, I'm really not sure if so many entities should be placed in "Buildings in..." categories. For example, entities like the FDR complex and the CIA, both in Hyde Park, are inherently more than just a building or a collection of buildings, which is why people won't go to that section to look for things like what colleges and attractions are in the area. Maybe it should be in "Buildings in..." if it was also in another Hyde Park subcat, but otherwise it should definitely at least be in the Hyde Park cat. I think the same could go for notable/key structures like the town hall and post office/library, where people will think it would be in a much more prominent/relevant cat. ɱ(talk) 23:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Haha, I really did not think it was worthy of the title, but it was nice to run across your photo, (smile) Thank you for the vote and cat help on Astor. That yacht just finished a 15 year sail around the world.. Have a great day, Cheers. --Don (talk) 15:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hall_of_Prayer_for_Good_Harvests
Dear Daniel Case,
I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hall_of_Prayer_for_Good_Harvests_interior_2014.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’
Best regards,
Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--hippofish 11:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk•contribs) 11:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Nominated photo question
Hi, recently I've nominated one of my photos for Commons's featurd picture which is Bangladeshi Young Girl. In that nomination, you asked a question about the stand-in of that girl on active rail. Yes. She is standing on the active rail. Thank you.
Time
Summersky around midnight in Lysekil
We have daylight savings time here in Sweden right now and my camera recognize that. So technically, the silage and tractors photo was taken an hour earlier (7:10 pm) if you go by astronomical time. So not that late.;) Since I was up late last night, I snapped this photo for you from my window to show what "real" midnight looks like at the moment. If the weather is fine on summer solstice a week or so from now, I'll see if I can go out and take a proper midnight photo that day. --cart-Talk 09:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
User:W.carter I was in Trondheim, Norway in the summer once. The sun only set for about an hour and even then it wasn't totally below the horizon. It was eerie being up at 11pm and being in broad daylight. PumpkinSkytalk 11:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
@PumpkinSky: It depends on what you are used to. For me it is eerie and strange to have dark nights when it's warm outside. Feels strange every time I travel south.:) Sorry for loitering on your talk page, Daniel. --cart-Talk 11:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Summer sky at 12:45 a.m. in Inuvik, Northwest Territories, Canada
@W.carter: You can loiter on my talk page all you want . That picture is what 9:30 p.m. looks like around here at the moment (and yes, we're on daylight savings/summer time as well). We have only five hours of real, sun-more-than-18º-below-the-horizon night this time of year.
@PumpkinSky: I've been further north than Trondheim. That's 12:45 a.m. in Inuvik, the largest town in the Canadian Arctic (or, OK, just to the south of Inuvik). After that picture, we went whitewater rafting and camping under that continuous sun in Ivvavik National Park for two weeks. Based on that experience, you can get used to it (but if you're in a tent with translucent white walls best to use a sleep mask ... sometimes even this time of year if I'm sleeping in it's a good thing too), although it doesn't stop being cool. Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
That's quite interesting. I hear the mosquitos up there in the summer are really bad too. Trondheim is the furthest north I've been on land but I've been up past the northern tip of Norway on ships.PumpkinSkytalk 15:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
@PumpkinSky: You have heard correctly about the mosquitoes. I'm sure if they had a mosquito Olympics, the North American Arctic team would easily kick the Florida team's ass (or whatever the appropriate body part would be), and then based on what I've heard they would in turn find themselves being used to mop up the floor by the Siberian team. https://www.flickr.com/photos/133250546@N06/21261774219/in/pool-2881294@N22/ Here's a photo of me, from the nose up, under attack one "evening"].
Ironically, that was the last day of the trip where they were really a problem ... that had been a day with 80-degree temperatures (Yes! 200 miles above the Arctic Circle—I actually took my only swim (such as it was) in the Firth that day), and within a day or two, it got considerably cooler (more like late September in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic USA) and as such the mosquitoes slowly reduced their presence to the point that well before we reached the Beaufort Sea they were happily a memory.
While looking at that photo may make you start to involuntarily scratch, shake and swat randomly, I was actually not getting bitten much thanks to the 30% DEET repellent I was wearing, which is pretty much de rigeur if you are outside and away from any large human settlement (i.e., downtown Inuvik) in that part of the world at that time of year. The Tilley hat and sunglasses are also being worn partly for defensive purposes.
You don't have to go far north in the US to experience really late sunsets this time of year. I remember a few years ago being in South Bend, IN, about as far west as you can get in the Eastern Time Zone, during early July, and feeling a little anxious as the sun stayed above the horizon until almost 9 p.m., a half-hour later than it does around here at its latest (anxious because I thought we had strayed into Central Time without realizing it). Apparently at the solstice that city enjoys sunsets at 9:22 p.m.. And if you go farther north but still stay on Eastern Time, to Marquette, MI, you can at the solstice enjoy a 9:46 p.m. sunset and astronomical twilight that persists until after midnight (making it theoretically possible to duplicate cart's picture above).
International Falls, MN and Bellingham, WA don't have sunsets quite so late ... but they do have dark-gray nights where it only gets to astronomical twilight, so if you look north at midnight or so you can see that bluish glow on the horizon and maybe even some reflected sunlight or dusk on a cloud near it if the angle is right. That little strip south of the western Canadian border is about the only place in the continental US where you can experience this sort of not-quite-night. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Box and bar of Côte d'Or chocolate.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
Hey Daniel - hope you're doing well! Wanted to give you a heads up that I've sent you an email. Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Blue sky in Spain
Hi Daniel, that one is really good. I'd suggest to categorize all images from Spain there and decat the few that don't fulfill it:) Poco2 07:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your next comment: I sort of see what you were seeing, and I love the texture, but on the whole it just doesn't feel like an FP for me. Some of the closeups in the annotations might have a chance, though. Daniel Case (Overleg)
What close up did you have in mind for any FP? Thank you in advance for your reply. Sincerely, Dominicus Bergsma.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world
I truly wish you, your family, and your friends Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world. Have a great holiday season. PumpkinSkytalk 20:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
FPC sets
Hi Daniel.
I do hope your holiday is going well.
If someone nominates a FPC set and it is unsuccessful, is it then allowed for them to nominate one of the set photos, of course the best one, individually? Thanks. PumpkinSkytalk 19:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This is exactly what I hope to find whenever I wander out into a wooded area looking for interesting foliage in the fall. Very nice. I think I need to get upstate a bit more.:) —Rhododendritestalk| 23:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. --PumpkinSky 01:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC) Really good photo, a possible FP, IMO, but you didn't credit the photographer in your nomination.:-) -- Ikan Kekek 02:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Checking in about what you foresee as a timeline for nominating the Christmas lights photos for deletion. I'd like to see it happen sooner rather than later, since as I said over at the fpc I'm not really psyched about the idea of a bunch of pictures in limbo, opposed at FPC because they might be nominated someday and there might be support for deleting. I can nominate one of my own as a test case, even. Based on all of the past threads I could find, and the handful of responses I solicited, my hunch is there will not be support for deletion, however (this was part of my decision to upload them to begin with). —Rhododendritestalk| 05:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsBeautiful landscape, great composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsI like the composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsVery nice. --PumpkinSky 02:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC) There's a dust spot in the upper middle. -- Ikan Kekek 11:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: DoneDaniel Case 04:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. --Berthold Werner 06:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC) I'm sorry, Daniel, but the right side is full of dust spots and there's at least one to the left of the steeple, too. If you're not tilting your screen back and forth to check for those before nominating photos, I recommend it. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Done Actually, due to my height, I have the screen tilted back about 20-30º to begin with. So I bob up and down instead.Daniel Case 23:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC) I cleared my cache twice, and I still see a slew of light dust spots, I swear, especially to the right of the steeple. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Done They were very faint, but they were there. Thanks again. Daniel Case 03:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Please examine both of these Firth River pics carefully for small dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek 08:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC) * Comment You can remove the dust particles.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC) @Agnes Monkelbaan: I had gone over it and uploaded a cleaned version before making this nom. If you still see some, can you leave notes where they are? Daniel Case 04:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Very vague left above. For me it is okay.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC) There's no way I can mark the dust spots. They're small and pretty light, but you should be able to see some if you look at full size and angle your laptop. They're a bit more obvious, though still small and light, on the other Firth River photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Done I'll look at the other one too. (BTW, I work on a desktop ... harder to angle. Daniel Case 03:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, Daniel Case. I followed your advice and add the {{consent|public}} on every page where the depicted faces can be identified. --Ввласенко 22:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by MifterBot(Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot(Talk • Contribs • Owner) 04:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsLooks very strong saturated, but anyways overall good quality. --Granada 07:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Comment photo has multiple dust spots and is in my opinion a bit on the blue side.--Famberhorst 16:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC) @Famberhorst: How is it now? Daniel Case 07:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC) You're good at it been vacuuming. Okay now for me.--Famberhorst 16:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. May be a little bit oversharpened and please check the blue sky. I'm not sure, but may be there is a dust spot at the building. --XRay 20:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC) @XRay: Done Thank you! I not only cleaned up the dust spot and the CA that I noticed in the process (which also seems to have helped with the sharpening) but corrected the perspective some more. Daniel Case 05:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.
If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsThe sky seems a bit too dark for me but O.K. now. --Ermell 12:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
You reviewed my photo of a 550 Barchetta, and what exactly is "magenta posterization?" How do I find it? How do I avoid/rectify it? As for the background, it is blurry on purpose, since the car is the subject of the photo. Thanks! mr.choppers(talk)-en- 22:27, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Haven't looked at the image yet, but a promotion to QI leads me to believe that you must have done some editing. Thanks!!! Best, mr.choppers(talk)-en- 01:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsLots of dust spots once again. -- Ikan Kekek 06:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC) OK, I went over it again. If you find more could you please note where? Daniel Case 16:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC) They're all over the place. There are a whole bunch of small ones on the left side and some in the upper middle. The ones I notice are in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: OK, I've finally uploaded another version. Daniel Case 20:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Support - Sky is still blotchy in places, but you did a good job on the dust spots. I think I saw one or maybe two very small, light ones, but I can't find either one anymore. -- Ikan Kekek 07:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some sensor dirt spots in the sky (too many to mark them all) Granada Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:25:40 GMT @Granada: I cleaned up what I could see. Daniel Case 17:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsShame about the deep shadow. It might be better to cut right. But for me the image is good enough.--Famberhorst 15:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsThe motif is well chosen. There is a bit posterization in the sky and I suggest to reduce saturation a bit.--Milseburg 17:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC) @Milseburg: DoneDaniel Case 03:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Sorry I meant to reduce the saturation in the whole image, especially blue. But this is the minor problem. The posterization in the sky is still there. Feel free to get other opinions. --Milseburg 16:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Done OK, other opinions, make yourselves known. Daniel Case 03:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC) Support OK for QI now I guess myself.--Milseburg 15:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
First of all LOL!! When I lived in Visby, I was once asked (in the middle of town) by a couple of American tourists: "You're supposed to have this old wall here, where is it?" I could only reply: "It's called the Visby City Wall, walk in any direction until you bump into it. They thought I was joking and that I was only being rude to tourists! --Cart(talk) 18:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
@W.carter: The first time I visited Berlin, in 1988, what was then West Berlin was, of course, enclosed by a wall. That first night I was determined to see it for myself. So I walked out of our hotel, along the Ku'damm, and then figured that whatever way I walked I'd hit it at some point.
And believe it or not I did ... no, this isn't a story where I spend all night walking in the wrong direction; I actually got there within an hour, although looking at the map I'm not sure if I did it on foot or via the U-bahn. Probably the latter, but whatever way I went I went up a disused block of Wilhelmstrasse, noticed that just ahead there was a point where a dark line slashed across the street and the street lights resumed some distance beyond it. I had, indeed, found the wall just by striking out toward it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind feedback about my picture.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality - looks like you forgot to mask the sharpening area, there's some amount of visible sharpening artefacts in the colors. --Granada 06:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Thanks. I tried to fix that. Also got rid of some more dust spots ... Daniel Case 03:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. But please remove the dust spot at the right of the right sailboat. --XRay 17:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC) @XRay: I couldn't find it ... could you leave a note? Daniel Case 17:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC) @Daniel Case: Yes, a added three notes for a lot of dust spots. Hopefully they are not from a cached image. --XRay 07:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC) Fixed Thanks for the notes! Daniel Case 05:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsContours of the buildings could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:18, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The perspective can be improved --Basile Morin 07:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC) There has not been a lack of trying here. Daniel Case 21:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC) It's visible on the left the building is leaning. If you need help to fix this I can make a new upload with the correction --Basile Morin 01:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC) @Basile Morin: By all means ... that was the part that kept giving me fits. Daniel Case 19:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC) Done so you may choose your version now, I'll try to keep an eye there -- Basile Morin 07:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC) @Basile Morin: We'll go with yours. Daniel Case 14:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC) *Comment You need to hurry, otherwise you get no longer in the group.--Famberhorst 05:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support A bit soft but still overall ok --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport similar problems like the other image, but not that strong and ok for QI to me --Carschten 13:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality. --Uoaei1 04:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective should be corrected and sharpness added. --Ermell 06:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC) DoneDaniel Case 03:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood perspective, but composition unfortunately contains large shadowed parts.. --Michielverbeek 18:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments improve the description on the image, the subjects are the letters --Ezarate 19:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC DoneDaniel Case 03:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)) Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The verticals on the radisson should be checked --Ermell 07:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC) FixedDaniel Case 15:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsBuildings seem to be slightly tilted to the right. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Engigstciak image styled as 1980s Windham Hill album cover.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Yours sincerely, Ruthven(msg) 19:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Vos aides et commentaires
Merci pour les commentaires que vous avez mis concernant les photos que j'ai soumis pour le label Quality images. Elle me permettent de comprendre et de progresser. --H2O(talk) 14:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please remove the dust spots and check the veticals. --Ermell 08:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC) FixedDaniel Case 07:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
just read that you withdrew your images from Cape Town on the QI candidates page. If you have raw files, I think there is a good chance to make QI images from them. The dust problem on the sensor might be a bit annoying. But in the sky it can be fixed easily. If I can help you with finding good raw processing parameters, just provide an example raw image. (Is there any space to exchange temporary files just for QI-related discussion?)
Best regards, --JRff (talk) 21:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
I will make the same offer to U, if you overhand an DNG-file, I will check it out from my side.
A new development is still the view from foreign eyes, but I really not understand what happened in your ACR (digital darkroom). I believe some settings are overdosed... The keywords for the main technical issues are "bevels", "edge enhancement", "edge sharpening", german words "Kantenbruch" or "Kantenumsetzung" hope we will find the correct parameter to fix it. I need DNG for keep it objective (new version 11.1 since End of last year) DNG included data from your equipment (lens AND sensor, ok dust too;-). I have a wishlist
1) Lion's_Head_from_Signal_Hill_in_winter_morning_light
2) Lion's Head from the slopes of Table Mountain
- I will not make a pledge if I have time this week, but I will do it.
Only issue is transfer-space, maybee Google-Drive. I overhand psd-files with different layers (will be big size). I don´t know a better way to show different ways of PS-Work around. Ohren hoch, ist noch kein Meister vom Himmel gefallenǃ;-) RE-gards&Saludos, Hans-Jürgen --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: ː Daniel, I AM NIKON, too and I know your sensor. Sometimes it´s better to convert it with your own machine, to get additional exif from lens. I can work with NEF but feel free to check out DNG (digital negative) from adobe. It´s free and real basis. Sorry for writing the wiki-articel about ACR only in german, have to translate it one day. See "https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Camera_Raw" embedded articles from adobe are english, see "http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/products/photoshop/pdfs/understanding_digitalrawcapture.pdf" the download you will find at the wiki-page, too (Version 11.1) I updated the urls today... Regards, --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Yuup, besser ist dasǃ Do it pls--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Es könnte etwas schwieriger sein, als ich dachte. Actually, I just checked and discovered that option isn't available (My guess is that there are some proprietary features in the .NEF format (Nikon, as you probably know, has that Capture software that it markets with some features exclusive to it; I guess that's what it is) that couldn't be stripped out without seriously damaging the file.
But let me see about downloading and using this. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep calm, old Dudeǃ Listen some old rock (for example Atomic Rooster, [Made in England], Time take my Life) or [Vivaldi, Stooges, just what u need] and don´t get stressed. A NEF is the origin ("Mutter") file format. DNG is open source and free minded (which vary from one raw converter to another) it is generating a doublette, doesn´t make only one change in your origin RAW-file. Btw I like Nikon, but I hate the creepy software. Capture is a mass (bullshit). For example WLAN is still a battery-war and they don´t fixed GPS with professional bodys. With the tablet solution it´s easy to fix geodata. My gps-mouse have costs about more then 300€ and it´s shity slow and NOT exact (grrrr)... get your own experienceǃ Saludos, Hans-Jürgen
@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Alright, I have converted about seven of the raw files that I used to .DNGs. Would you like me to put them somewhere in the cloud where you can get them? I have some options available to me, but if you would prefer some space of your own choice, let me know where.
By the way I took my camera to a shop to have the sensor cleaned. They were only able to blow out the dust, however, as some of the marks are from metal shards and they did not feel comfortable wiping them off because they could scratch the sensor. At least they didn't charge for what they could do.
As for the shards, they said to ask Nikon, so I'm waiting for an email back from them.
This might mean it's time to start using, at least for a while, the D800 I took these pictures with (Yes, it's newer but you know, you get used to the camera you've been using for a few years and you don't just give up on it ). Daniel Case (talk) 06:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Hello Daniel, it´s up to you. The two Lion-Head I will work out you can send by mail (see my commons page for adress). I will upload the psd-files at my google drive for sharing. You can start with your space to. Never mindǃ--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
First Lion´s Head you can download here (psd-file) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gST1ri7xJVqsf-Sl3c4PeYZfXplZb0jd I only do not understand why Dxo can´t read exif from your jpeg and DNG?? Need NEF, too. Sorry for bother. I documented ACR Settings in additional word, like a recipe. The Hipa-Layer shows a way of sharpening, it´s not a must, more a add. screw like a gearwheel. Nice weekend - --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: I looked at it briefly. I will be away at a convention for the weekend, so I won't be able to send you the .NEF until Sunday. Daniel Case (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
WikiDay
Saw you listed under "regrets" for WikiDay tomorrow. Thought I'd let you know, then, that at least your work will be there.:) As last year, I've compiled some stand-out images of NY by NY Commons photographers and included these: cascade, cairn, tracks, Speedway, and pond. —Rhododendritestalk| 23:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
@Rhododendrites: Well, that was nice ... I did miss the event, and I hope that next year WikiDay and LaxCon don't overlap. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Automated categorization
Hi, Daniel. I’m contacting you because you described yourself as "a very active Commons categorizer". I’ve been doing a lot of categorizing of images in Category:Images from Cleveland Museum of Art and I can’t help but feel that almost everything I’m doing could be more efficiently and systematically done in an automated or at least semi-automated fashion. For all I know what I’m asking about is already possible (or because of some technical limitation is not possible), but I’m just not tuned-in enough to know, so forgive me if what I’m about ask seems clueless.
Is this possible now and I just don’t know about it? Or is there some reason it’s not feasible? —Rrburke (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Broccoli
Hi, Daniel
Merci pour ton vote. Tu ne t'ai pas trompé c'est un broccoli... Qui est un chou! Bonne journée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
!vote and !votes in FPC
Hi Daniel, I'm wondering what the !vote and !votes you are writing in your FPC comments are doing, I wasn't able to find documentation about this notation here on Commons. Regards –Lucas 07:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
@Lucasbosch: Some people, myself included, use the exclamation point before "vote" on-wiki to acknowledge that sheer numbers are not the way we decide things (otherwise it would be too easy for people to just drive loopholes right through policy, even if inadvertently), that our expressions of favor or disfavor for something must also include, even if by reference, our reasons why or why not, since it is really about consensus rather than majority. See here for another statement about this. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Signatures inside the template
Hi Daniel, I think it is better to have your signature inside the template. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks Daniel for adding Category:Photographs taken on .... at some of my files. Regards --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Daniel Case,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Sorry but I don't really understand your reason here, I don't see a issue. First: The images is available under a free license here, and now on Flickr also. Second: the photo was never under a non-free license (all rights reserved is just a default choice if you forget to choice a license), even if I uploaded the photo on web page without any information the photo will still be "all rights reserved" since photos are protected by copyright. I have uploaded 1000s of photos under free licenses and I think it is a bit ridiculous to talk about a "right issue" here.--ArildV (talk) 18:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
@ArildV: I didn't realized you had changed the license at Flickr ... it used to be so much harder. I have therefore changed my !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Regards--ArildV (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
FP candidate - map of NY
Hi Daniel Case! You opposed on the NY map as FP Candidate with the argument that the map is not correct. Thank you for the comment. I corrected the I-86. Do you see any other issue? Thanks (I am not pushing to change your vote:-) but as you have not reacted I just try to understand if there is something else that can improve the map) regards --Ikonact (talk) 08:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators.
… for the many valuable categories you have added to my twophotos! I try to categorize my photos well, but often I do not know all possible categories or forget some of them, so your help is very much appreciated! --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
PS, could you archive the older parts of your talk page, please: it is very long, which can cause some computers to crash when opened for viewing. Thanks! MPF (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bronze statue of Mao Zedong at National Museum of China.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi! Did you e-mail me tonight or has your e-mail account been hacked? I only want to make sure it's you before I answer. Cheers, --Cart(talk) 21:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Tracks are for Trains - What prompted the template?
As In the title, what prompted the template?
I think it's a good thing to do, I assume you are also aware of "Operation Lifesaver" in the US?
@ShakespeareFan00: What prompted it was seeing an awful amount of pictures taken by people from on tracks. At around the same time, OLI was beginning a campaign to warn people against doing that for their social media feeds. I thought it was a good idea here, too, and we copied the wording of that campaign. Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
I will also mention that there has been some concern in the UK rail enthusiast press about 'vidiots' ( i.e people taking video on phones, photographers and so on being in unsafe positions.). This included a minority at enthusiast events, that should have known better. Do you plan on encouraging wider use of the message on other sites? My thought would be to try and get the 'Trainsim' community aware as well. In the early 2000's I encouraged a community of train-sim developers to put the message 'There's nothing Virtual about Serious injury! Real Trains Kill!' in banner ads on their sites along with appropriate commentary, but the original site that was the hub page of that campaign is no longer online sadly.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
For your outstanding reviews on the FPC page. I have learned a lot from your comments on photographs, whether you praise or point out problems. Your hints on the composition, on the colours etc. hit the nail on the head and often make clear in a few words what I have somehow sensed but have not seen clearly. Your contributions therefore contribute a great deal to making the FPC page not (just) a competition for featured images, but a great place to learn. --Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
PS, to avoid misunderstandings: This is not (only) a ‘thank you’ for your last ‘support’ vote on one of my photos. Your comment has just reminded me that I have been wanting to thank you for a long time for all of your FPC comments, including any critical ones, so I finally did it;–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Not addressed stitching issue in FP candidate
Hello Daniel, I hope you are doing well. I fixed the note you added in an FPC of mine some time ago. I couldn't take care of that earlier because I was retired. Thank you for that, there was indeed an issue there. Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
@Brianjd: Thanks for the reminder—at the time I uploaded them we had barely started putting those tags on images. I put {{Consent}} tags on them with the "public" argument since they were both taken in public spaces. Since they're from behind and you can't see the subjects' faces, I didn't think {{Personality rights}} was necessary. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Sorry, forgot to ping you here. Responded. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
FPX
IMHO the FPX brick is not meant to give the final kick to an already unsuccessful nomination. It’s the nominator’s choice to withdraw it any time. FPX is meant for freshly nominated images showing issues which cannot be tolerated on FPC – such as too small / unsharp / tilted / pixelpulp – to spare them an exhausting series of opposes. The image in question is not that bad at all, and wasn’t a clearly losing candidate from the beginning IMHO. "does not fall into our guidelines because it does not look likely to succeed" is a weird reason. --Kreuzschnabel 15:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Village Dump
Just some information for you: My edit on w:wp:Village dump was an accident and I didn’t intend for vandalism, I just thought it would be a cool page, and had no knowledge of it being used by trolls, could you please unblock me? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
What's your enwiki account? When I search for one by this name there, it tells me that no account by that name exists. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
OK, I looked at that range. Yes, I have blocked it for a rather long time. But there are other problematic edits from the IP besides the ones to "Village Dump" which make the case for an unblock a little more complicated.
You have edited Commons and other Foundation wikis productively under this username. How come you've never created an account at enwiki? I realize now that the block may be preventing that, but you've had the opportunity for a while. I mean, if you wanted to do that, it might be easier that way. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Well I only started really editing on other wikis after I was blocked (other than one time years ago I uploaded a photo). – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
OK, I'm going to be a little busy at real-world work through the end of the month but I can at least start here.
Is that one edit to the "Village Dump" page the only one you made from that range? There are other edits that led to the block. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
As far as I know of every edit under that range was made by me, but at the time I didn't really understand the system, now I am much more experienced. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Also the reason I kept creating pages with new requests and questions is because of two reasons:
1) Since I was blocked from editing pages other than my Talk Page every time my IP changed I would have to create a new page.
2) At the time I didn't really understand why I was blocked, and wasn't really given a full explanation. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Also, next time you respond, can you please ping me? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: Sure (I actually thought this new system does it automatically, so I haven't done it as much) Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Also, can you reply to my other answers? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: I read them; I understand. I am thinking of talking to the admin who made the original block to see what he thinks. I would answer at some length but it's getting late by US Eastern time and I have to get up early for work tomorrow and I want to get some other things done before bed). Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Just so you know: I also live in upstate New York. Also, could you talk to him? (there are some edits I have been waiting a long time to make) – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: Sure; probably not till tomorrow (i.e., much later today) though. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Also, if a blocked user has a dynamic IP, what are they meant to do about their Talk Page? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: That's why it's easier in those situations to have an account. I wish we could create talk pages for ranges, but they'd be treated as regular user account talk pages and thus the blocked IPs could not use them.
Since we've been more willing to block /64 ranges of late, since ISPs give them out more with the idea that a single user will be assigned them, that is an issue we should address (but it's beyond my pay grade, unfortunately). Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Well, maybe you could submit a phab request? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: Yeah, or just suggest the idea on ... Village Pump! Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: Enwiki, since that's where we are having the issue so far. Discussions there IME seem to get more people interested in doing something to change it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Well, how am I meant to start a discussion if I am blocked? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
I meant that I would do it ... as an admin who has blocked a lot of people, I'd like to think my opinion would carry some weight. But of course if you can join in you should, and I won't be starting that discussion just yet.
(I'm sorry I wasn't able to respond yesterday ... my workday was longer than expected, I didn't get much sleep beforehand and then of course the weather was unseasonably cool. I finally got home, ate a belated dinner, watched TV with my wife and then I just couldn't stay awake any more (especially since I had to get up earlier again. And then tomorrow I have to get up even earlier Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Okay. Also, have you asked El C yet? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
El C responded to your question saying that he’s okay with whatever you want to do, so am I getting unblocked? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Ilovemydoodle: I just did it. You can create your account there now. Happy editing! Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC) (Addendum ... sorry it took a while, I had to work around work. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC))
Could you please change "Doom, first online first-person shooter" to "Doom, the first online first-person shooter" on this page? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Blocked, again
I am now blocked again from Wikipedia, and I don't know why. Could you please help sort this out? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Please give credit where credit due 69.206.44.221 22:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
@69.206.44.221: I was there that day; I still very much remember taking that image with the camera credited in the metadata. I do not remember anyone else being there, save my son sitting in my nearby parked car. It isn't perfect; I wish the sun had not been where it was, but it depicts the lake and that's what counts.
I do not not understand why you insist you took that image ... it has always existed in purely digital form (I don't have the original memory card anymore; there was no print original). Perhaps you took one that seems very similar? I assure you then it is a coincidence. I'd be interested in seeing it.
I note that your IP resolves to the Kingston area ... perhaps you can email me via the link on my user page? This is not the best way to discuss this. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Milan skyline around Unicredit Tower from Duomo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This file is an image of a structure with a copyright-protected design, captured in a jurisdiction without the "Commons:Freedom_of_panorama freedom of panorama," and the uploader did not supply a license from the architect.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
Hello Daniel Case, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It has been a pleasure to have you as a fellow Wikimedian this year. Wherever you are, enjoy the festive season and stay warm (if you're north of the Tropic of Cancer)! Your help in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikimedia Commons will always be appreciated.
Maybe it should be "petrified wood from the United States". "In", to me, in English, means "physically within" in that sense, at the time the photo was taken.
A lot of our art-location categories would benefit from this, as we have many photos of artworks from one country exhibited in another. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
List of stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame
I believe Vali Vijelie entry is incorrect and should be removed.
Think ye might have made a typo there. While I do try for 50% women-related restorations, this isn't one of them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
@Radomianin: Thank you very much! I'm sure you're wondering where I've been from FAC the last couple of months; I've been a) getting over computer problems, b) focusing on articles I've been working on for a while and c) distracted by the extra administrative work created by the Israel-Hamas war. But I do intend to get back to FAC soon ... I miss it! Meanwhile, very happy end-of-year holidays to you! Our time in Singapore was very well spent! Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your message, Daniel. I understand that other tasks are more primary and important, especially concerning the terrible war in Israel or the one in Ukraine. Take your time and when you return to FPC you will be welcomed with open arms. Yes, the Wikimania in Singapore was a great experience and our personal conversations are among my highlights. It was a real pity that I could only be there for a few days because of my work. Merry Christmas to you and your loved ones! See you soon:) -- Radomianin (talk) 08:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Season Greetings
Wishing You all the best for the Holiday Season!
I hope You are warm, safe and treated kindly ♦
-- Cart(talk) 18:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
@W.carter: God Jul to you too! If you've been wondering about my relative absence from Commons the last couple of months, I explained it to Radomianin above. And once again, I do see it as being temporary ... I'll make a New Year's resolution to return.
In the meantime, it is very nice to know that I have not been forgotten. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Really good to hear from you again! Yes, you are missed and certainly not forgotten.:-) I had figured out that you had things to take care of on en-WP, but didn't know the extent of it. We'll keep the porch light on for you until you return to FPC. --Cart(talk) 07:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Best wishes
✴ Happy Holidays, Daniel ✴
Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
… And I have been missing you on FPC, too;–). Thank you very much for your explanation above! All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
*ೃ༄ Feliz Navidad, Daniel_Case *ೃ༄
Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness!
Щасливого Різдва та Нового року, нехай він принесе мир, любов та радість у ваше життя!
Joyeux Noël et une Bonne année pleine de paix, d'amour et de bonheur!
¡Feliz Navidad y un próspero año nuevo lleno de paz, amor y felicidad!
Buon Natale e un felice anno nuovo pieno di pace, amore e felicità!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr voller Frieden, Liebe und Glück!
Feliz Natal e um Ano Novo próspero repleto de paz, amor e felicidade!
メリークリスマス、そして平和と愛、幸福に満ちた新年おめでとうございます！
메리 크리스마스와 평화, 사랑, 행복이 가득한 새해 복 많이 받으세요!
मेरी क्रिसमस और शांति, प्रेम, और खुशियों से भरा नया साल मुबारक हो!
圣诞快乐，新年快乐，愿你的生活充满和平、爱与幸福！
عيد ميلاد مجيد وسنة جديدة سعيدة مليئة بالسلام والحب والسعادة!
С Рождеством и Новым Годом, пусть они принесут мир, любовь и счастье в вашу жизнь!
God Jul och Gott Nytt År fyllt med fred, kärlek och lycka!
Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar vol vrede, liefde en geluk!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Good day, sir. I hope you are well. Is it possible for you to put a picture of the actual creator of "The Griddy" dance on the Wikipedia page? If not, then can you please provide a reason as to why it can't be done? Thank you in advance for your consideration. 2603:8001:C501:122:B2A4:ED28:65A5:79FD 00:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
File:Red and white wine in glasses on white background.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Thanks for uploading File:1 May poster 1934 AYAP Lvov.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi Daniel! Thank you very much for your comment on my photograph of Kristina Inhof at Wikimania 2024 while I was watching the stream on Youtube. I feel more than honoured! I‘m not in Katowice but in case you meet her you could give Ailura a hug!
Regards from Vienna,
Julia Granada (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
You’re welcome! Ailura told me about how she was there when you took it … I haven’t seen her around yet today but when I do I will give her the hug.
(Sorry for the delay in responding; I haven’t logged into Commons from my iPad in a while so I had to do that). Daniel Case (talk) 10:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
You got a barnstar!
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for the images taken at Roxham Road, which are of journalistic quality. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Just FYI I reverted your category edits because it was in fact September 2010 when the image was taken, as indicated in the summary information. That camera had an internal clock that reset to July 2002 every time the battery died and I just got tired of resetting it. Just Step Sideways (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
OK ... no problem. Figured there had to be a good reason. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello! You uploaded this and licensed it GFDL. However, Commons no longer allow files licensed only GFDL since 2018. Perhaps you could also add cc-by-sa-4.0 for example? MGA73 (talk) 11:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
I did, actually ... take a look again. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Aha! Thank you. You need to use the self template if you dual licese. Like Special:Diff/969006260. --MGA73 (talk) 18:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
I did ... I have always multilicensed my own work. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2025!
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence
Your images are amazing. Suke75 (talk) 03:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
CSD G10 (Files and pages created as advertisements)
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.
Hey Daniel, I tried to edit a Wikipedia page today for probably the first time in 15 years, because it had extremely offensive /inflammatory content, which I’ve screenshotted, and I got a notification that you’ve blocked me from editing? Why? The reason listed was something related to Cool Hand Luke, which I’ve never seen and whose page I’ve never tried to edit. Now wiki won’t let me create an account or log in because you’ve blocked me. I’m a NY resident and US citizen. What gives you the right to block me, btw, just curious? I’ve donated to Wikipedia multiple times over the last two decades. Please explain. Maybe instead you could block the person who edited a lawmaker’s page to have inflammatory political content today. 2600:1017:B42C:29DD:90B1:9081:B47E:F3A3 16:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
If you look at the block message, you'll see it was a rangeblock (it ends with /40), which means it applies to a user or users who was/were on a dynamic IP who has, based on the history of that block and the IPs on the range, repeatedly used that range to edit disruptively. This unfortunately happens a lot more with IPv6 addresses, as they were designed to be used that way by ISPs.
It has nothing to do with you personally (in fact, no IP block, even to a static IP, is meant to target individual users, as who uses them can and does change over time). For that reason we never block IPs indefinitely (although we can and do block for long terms, as you can see from this block).
The current block ends next month and I am disinclined to lift it before then because of its history of renewed abuse every time the block has expired in the past. I am sorry that you have been inconvenienced because of this. You have other options, such as creating a registered account or using a different set of IPs (i.e., another computer, like one at a library or college), to make your edit if it's still necessary (and if the vandalism you describe is still there, feel free to leave a link here). Daniel Case (talk) 23:16, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Dear License reviewer,This is to inform you that a new page, Commons:Permission requests, has been created to centralize and manage requests for permission to external sources. The page is intended to help streamline the review process by providing a dedicated space where users can submit and track their permission requests.You may wish to visit the page to familiarize yourself with its purpose and format, and to monitor any new submissions that may require your attention. By default, license reviewers may process requests on the page. Any questions may be directed at Commons talk:Permission requests.Thank you for your continued work in ensuring proper license compliance across Commons.
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
On November 12, temporary accounts will be enabled on Commons. The IP of unregistered users will then be hidden for most users. You, as a patroller or license reviewer, are eligible to request the new temporary account IP viewer right, if you need it to continue fighting vandalism and abuse on Commons. If you want to request the right, please file the request here. Please be aware that you also have to accept the Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy in your preferences. For more information about temporary accounts, look at the project page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Frozen page containing malicious, untrue, damaging content about a living person
This is a message for Daniel Case. Daniel, I am an 81 year old man (a living person) whose reputation, and whose charity's reputation, are being maliciously and knowingly severely damaged on Wikipedia by statements that can be proven to be untrue. And as far as I can see, you have frozen the page containing the untrue statements. I wrote to Wikipedia about this, but received a very unhelpful answer from a bot. I suspect you would not want to be part of this damage, which comes at a very sensitive time in the work of the charity, when many children could lose out on benefits due to the demonstrable lies of a vindictive ex-employee who has waged a campaign against us for nearly two years. I am not skilled in navigating Wikipedia, and should instead be focused on the children whose lives I can potentially transform. Is there any way of disussing this by email or telephone? You can reach me on LinkedIn at
https://www.linkedin.com/in/transforminglocalareassociallyeconomicallyandhealthandfundingthattransformation?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=android_app
Sorry it's so long. I am an experienced clinical criminologist and trauma therapist, but not very good at technology.
Help me, Daniel, please Josephbloggs129 (talk) 04:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Which page would that be? I can't tell from what you wrote. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
The 'frozen' page is for the charity WAVE Trust. The untrue, libellous comments have been repeatedly posted on both that page and my personal page, George Hosking. Below is where I think you 'locked' the page - certainly I have contacts who have been unable to remove the libellous content in recent weeks, so it sits there.
I have now reported this matter to the UK Police, as the actions of the person (a disgruntled ex-employee of the charity) who has been repeatedly posting this material on both sites since April 2025 are a criminal offence under the UK 2006 Fraud Act.
curprev 04:30, 8 October 2025 Daniel Case talk contribs 6,056 bytes +55 +protection notice thank
curprev 04:29, 8 October 2025 Daniel Case talk contribs m 6,001 bytes 0 Protected "WAVE Trust": Violations of the biographies of living persons policy: per RFPP and WP:CT/BLP ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 04:29, 8 April 2026 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 04:29, 8 April 2026 (UTC))) thank Josephbloggs129 (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes, that's the one I had been thinking it was (I don't have a LinkedIn account and have no plans to, so I couldn't really respond there).
It isn't locked so much as restricted from being edited by users whose accounts are a) less than 4 days old and b) have made less than 25 edits. We very rarely fully protect a page, and even then usually for just short durations.
The content you are objecting to, whatever the truth may be behind it, was published in a news outlet we consider to be a reliable source. If that source, or other reliable sources, report something different, of course that should be added to the article.
It sounds to me like you might want to talk about this with the Wikimedia Foundation's legal department (they do have representation in the U.K. you or any solicitor you retain can get in touch with). Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
It is interesting that one of the very documents uploaded by the person making these false statements (knowing them to be false) actually proves that both of the repeated claims he has been making, which he claims are endorsed by documentation, are disproved by his own documenttation. Presumably Wikipedia does not have time to check all supposed confirmation documents. The offender has repeatedly posted on both my personal page and the WAVE Trust page the WAVE does not consider child sexual abuse to be an adverse childhood experience (ACE). Yet the following is an extract from his uploaded document:
SECTION G: CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE While the target for a 70% reduction by 2030 – the 70/30 target – has not been set for Child Sexual Abuse (CSA), it is a pernicious and hugely damaging experience for any child, probably much more so than physical abuse. WAVE and the Cross Party Group share a 15 commitment to prevent and reduce CSA and welcome any contributions which would help create a major reduction in levels of CSA. The following four questions invite evidence-based contributions."
A second document, which is part of the same reference document, has the text of a letter from me to John SWinney, now First Minister of Scotland. The letter clearly states that I invite John Swinney to devote 31 minutes of his time to watching a video (which provides policy evidence I thought would be very helpful to him, and which was commissioned by a Police and Crime Commissioner); and that I offer to make a payment to a charity of his choice if he were to watch the video. The person who is harrassing us repeatedly states that I offered money directly to Mr Swinney in return for a meeting with him - which his own "evidence" proves is a false statement. Mt Swinney did not watch the video, but we did meet. No money was paid to anyone.
It is true that in 2022 a Scottish regional newspaper published an article in which someone they interviewed made the false claim that WAVE did not believe child sexual abuse to be an ACE. I wrote to the newspaper immediately requesting a correction. They refused on the grounds that it was written by their top reporter and she did not make mistakes. I decided - wrongly in hindsight - not to waste time fighting this and to get on with what I devote 60 hours a week to - stopping child abuse. I can provide a published 2013 report by WAVE - published jointly with the UK Government - which clearly states that WAVE believes child sexual abuse is an adverse childhood experience. Could you post that on the two pages for the sake of truth? We also have scores of other documents which state the same, but most are not published to the public, but commissioned by local authorities and Health Boards. Josephbloggs129 (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Merry Christmas and warm wishes for a joyful, healthy, and peaceful New Year 2026!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi Daniel, I hope you're well. I haven't seen you around for a while and just wanted to say hello. I wish you all the best. Bye, Livio.--~2026-19240-35 (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
cart-Talk 11:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per your wife: It's a shaver. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I truly wish you, your family, and your friends Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world. Have a great holiday season. PumpkinSky talk 20:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 04:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg)
_(2).jpg)
Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Done – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 04:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
c.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Darling_Harbour_--_2019_--_3193-5.jpg){kind=link}
