User talk:MBH

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MaxBioHazard!

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


Hello, MBH!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Posankka.jpg

File:Posankka.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A333 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Can you please delete this?

Gp2xwi.jpg

Hello. I just uploaded File:Gp2xwi.jpg but I wrote the wrong name, so can you please delete it. Thanks.--Gaming&Computing (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply mark it like this: {{rename|the_new_name|reason_for_renaming}} and wait for an administrator or filemover to rename it. MaxBioHazard (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Map of Ukrainian dialects-ru.png

Обратите, пожалуйста, внимание на этот комментарий. --Gleb Borisov (talk) 09:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Исправил. В следующий раз пишите не сюда, а на мою СО в рувики, сюда я нечасто захожу. MaxBioHazard (talk) 16:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Dots/Pog-Set

Hey there! Could you make a Black+Cyan (50/50) pog as well? Preferably black on the left. Best regards, Rehman 07:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Do not overwrite files

Hi MaxBioHazard, please read and understand COM:OVERWRITE. You have to upload new pictures to new filenames! Thanks for your contributions. --SI 16:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello MBH, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Cross 2016-10-25 005.jpg

Если только для теста - а вообще-то, такое название надо было менять на более осмысленное (с указанием, где он расположен) или не менять вообще. NBS (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles

Спасибо за апдейт (а что там за лучший алгоритм?), но просьба тогда уж убрирать дублирование со страницами User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles - panoramio и User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles - однотипные. NBS (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Вторая страница уже вряд ли нужна - все наиболее массовые случаи, выделенные в неё, я переименовал. Смысла выделения первой страницы я не понял. Новый алгоритм призван исключить из результатов случаи вида "Adygheв, Adygheг, Adygheд" - это не кирлат, а просто соединение без пробела кириллической и латинской строк. Впрочем, я реализовал его неполностью, скоро ещё обновлю. MBH (talk) 17:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
    • Смысл в том, что эта страница - не "то, что надо переименовать", а "то, переименованием чего я, возможно, займусь". Переименовывать файлы с panoramio я, за редким исключением, не буду - я не переименовываю файлы, в лицензионной чистоте которых сомневаюсь, а с panoramio в этом смысле больше возни (и без panoramio достаточно работы). И не все файлы со второй страницы переименованы либо попали под новый алгоритм - дублирование есть. Я только приветствую обновление основной страницы, но при этом три просьбы: 1) убирать дублирование с этими двумя страницами; 2) с этих двух подстраниц убирать переименованные файлы, не обновляя страницы по каким-либо другим алгоритмам; 3) все файлы, убранные с основной страницы в связи с изменением алгоритма, перенести на User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles +. NBS (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
    • И кстати. Скрипт переименования автоматически предлагает заменить прописные буквы в расширении файла на строчные (.JPG → .jpg и пр.). NBS (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
      • Скинул результаты по самому последнему алгоритму на User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles - strict. Там только названия, в которых символ одного алфавита, входящий в группу символов с совпадающим между алфавитами начертанием (аеорсухАВЕЗКМНОРСТХ/aceopxABCEHKMOPTX), заключён между двумя символами другого алфавита, то есть наиболее явный кирлат, начать можно с них. MBH (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Den1980-#Defaultsort

Привет. См. ↑ , следующую тему там же и User talk:Sealle#Wikidata Infobox. Есть ли какая-то возможность задействовать бот для исправления ситуации? В идеале надо просто вернуть defsort туда, где он был, поставить там, где его не было, и оставить Wikidata Infobox. Или хотя бы сделать из этого то, что возможно. Sealle (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Плохо понимаю запрос. Вернуть - понятно, а поставить - новый, самостоятельно вычислив, каким он должен быть? В англоязычных проектах систематически пользуются дефолтсортом и сортируют по фамилиям, несмотря на прямой порядок в названиях? На каком множестве статей это следует сделать? MBH (talk) 18:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Так я и написал: если сложно, то не нужно. На самом деле действительно в некоторых элементах WD уже проставлены параметры Given name и Family name; там, где они есть, DEFAULTSORTы не нужны. Там, где нет — если вдруг это можно как-то пропарсить, было бы отлично. Sealle (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
    • На каком множестве статей – не статей, а категорий, по вкладу Den1980- за последнюю неделю. Sealle (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
      • Чото как-то сложно, я пока не возьмусь. Я могу откатить правку целиком, а не частично, оставив одно и откатив другое. Напиши на РДБ, может там кто возьмётся. MBH (talk) 02:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators.

--Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png

File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DSwissK (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Krd 08:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleting File:A_Ukrainian_wikipedian_is_saing_about_truce.png

You just don't understand what you are talking about. UeArtemis is a VERY important Ukrainian Wikipedian. RianRamello (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm talking about the copyright and I think it's you are person who don't understand what are we (Wikimedia Commons community) talking about. MBH 15:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Say for yourself. You are not Wikimedia Commons community and you don't understand what you are talking about. RianRamello (talk) 15:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Переименование и категоризация файлов

Привет! Вы бы не могли меня выручить с категоризацией и переименованием файлов из следующих категорий:

  1. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Mil.ru
  2. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Mos.ru
  3. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Duma.gov.ru/2013
  4. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/President.am?

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

что именно сделать? MBH 10:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Во-первых - разобрать файлы по категориям Викисклада, опознать людей, во-вторых - опознать людей (текущие названия многих файлов - временные и я заливал их пакетом). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Опознать людей точно не помогу - я очень плохо узнаЮ людей по лицам. Вот известные мне здания или, там, скриншоты игр - да, мог бы разобрать. MBH 14:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Таким образом, вы специализируетесь на компьютерных играх и сооружениях? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Не только, но на людях точно нет. MBH 18:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russian National Library 14.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russian National Library 14.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Мне казалось, на снимок под углом (не скан) двумерного объекта, не представляющего художественной ценности, не налагается копирайт автора этого объекта. MBH 21:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Извините, но нет, на Викискладе это так не работает. Нарисованный ребёнком плакат тоже запросто может быть выше порога оригинальности и по умолчанию несвободен. И мне кажется, этот ни разу не исключение. При всём уважении к вашему википедийному вкладу, вам следует тщательнее отбирать то, что выкладываете. Там много нарушений, например, в рф есть Свобода панорамы только для архитектуры, но, например, не для скульптур в общественном пространстве. --A.Savin 10:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Ок, я не против удаления. Что до остальных фото - да, разумеется я знаю о свободе панорамы, сперва грузил всё это в рувики (ещё до принятия ГК4), потом не-скульптуры перезагрузил на склад. Одну скульптуру по ошибке я тогда тоже загрузил на склад, и она провисела тут 10 лет без всяких претензий. Я обсудил это на Ф-АП в рувики, и Спейд сказал - да, на складе тонны российского нонФОП, и я сам его вижу (например я отказался грузить на склад фото памятника Резанову, и в итоге он всё равно висит на складе, просто не мой). Тонны фото скульптур Ораниенбаума на склад ещё до меня загрузила опытная участница, лауреатка Википремии Екатерина Борисова (часть из них - копии античных, но лишь часть), и в этих условиях я просто не понимаю, чем я хуже. Почему на складе тонны российского ФОПа, а я его грузить не могу. И это не говоря ещё о том, что в половине Европы тоже ФОПа нет, но фото Эйфелевой башни что-то никто не удаляет. Поэтому моя позиция сейчас такая - грузить всё, что удалят - окей, спустя несколько десятилетий восстановят (или даже раньше, если изменят закон), но файлы уже будут подготовлены, верно категоризованы. Я их спустя эти несколько десятилетий уже не загружу. MBH 11:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
А ещё, например, я сделал очень много фото с питерских Литераторских мостков (такое кладбище для элиты), и там совершенно непонятно, в каком году создан памятник - есть явно старые, есть и новые, мне год создания неизвестен, и его не нагуглишь, в отличие от единичных скульптур. Но на складе уже тонна фото с этого кладбища, и опять я решаю, что чем я хуже? MBH 11:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Эйфелева башня находится в общественном достоянии... Да, там были проблемы с её ночной подсветкой, но это другая история и в ней и Свобода панорамы едва ли бы нам помогла.
"Почему другие выкладывают, а мне нельзя" -- так себе аргумент, вот лично я не люблю, когда мои изображения выставляют к удалению, поэтому в спорных случаях предпочитаю лишний раз перепроверить, прежде чем выкладывать. И этим я не только себе но и проекту делаю лучше (имхо) --A.Savin 12:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Не только башня: я помню лет 12-14 назад кампанию на складе за принятие СП евросоюзом в целом: они там закрашивали чёрным здания и монументы на складовских фото, показывая, что вот как много запрещённого - но ведь это значит, что незакрашенный файл на складе уже лежал! И в ряде стран даже здания не в фопе. В общем у меня сложилось впечатление, что на складе гигатонны нон-фопа из всех стран, а суровость законов здесь тоже смягчается необязательностью их исполнения. MBH 12:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Кампания, кстати, закончилась ничем: представительница Франции отдельно послала википедийное сообщество и его хотелки и сказала, что ничего они менять не будут, а авторам зданий надо платить. MBH 13:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russian National Library 13.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russian National Library 13.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:All Religions Temple in Kazan 30.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:All Religions Temple in Kazan 30.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

0x0a (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

The Editor's Barnstar

The Editor's Barnstar
English: For helping to upload over 50,000 football photos and long-term work on Wikimedia Commons.
Русский: За помощь в загрузке более 50 тысяч футбольных фото и длительную работу на Викискладе.
Українська: За допомогу у завантаженні понад 50 тисяч футбольних фото та тривалу роботу на Вікісховище.

Mitte27 (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Спасибо! Дякую! MBH 13:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Возложение цветов к могиле Валентина Белькевича. 1 августа 2016 года — 699106.jpg

File:Возложение цветов к могиле Валентина Белькевича. 1 августа 2016 года — 699106.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Матч «Динамо» - «Металлург» Запорожье 2-3. Молодёжное первенство. 16 августа 2008 года — 528833.png

File:Матч «Динамо» - «Металлург» Запорожье 2-3. Молодёжное первенство. 16 августа 2008 года — 528833.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:39, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@A.Savin у меня пока совсем нет времени дискутировать эти удаления, задам вопрос только про планы эвакуации - ???? Они не обладают художественной ценностью, генерируются по формальным правилам по данным из внешнего источника, это чистый exempt или ineligible, как по мне. MBH 13:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
По умолчанию нам, думаю, всё же лучше действовать по максимуму предосторожности и приравнивать пожарные планы, например, к планам городов, которые тоже могут быть несвободны. Не совсем понимаю, зачем такие фотографии нужны вообще, хотя это и отдельная история. --A.Savin 20:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Матч памяти легенд «Динамо». 15 ноября 2017 года — 812971.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Матч памяти легенд «Динамо». 15 ноября 2017 года — 812971.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright © 2001-2024 Dynamomania.com.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yuval Y § Chat § 19:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

@Yuval CT what was the problem with all of these files? It was a mass upload from an external site after receiving an OTRS approval. MBH 05:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
@Yuval CT, All files from the Dynamomania website are available under a Creative Commons license, see. Template:Dynamomania. --Mitte27 (talk) 06:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
@Yuval CT Could you please revert your deletions? As two users pointed out above, Dynamomania gave a permission to upload files by CC-BY-SA (OTRS approved) as indicated in the template above. I don't really understand why you didn't look on template which was present in ALL of the files before deleting them. Well very well (talk) 09:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
@Yuval CT: These files were indeed not copyright violations, so I undeleted them. Yann (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)


User:MBH/ftb.js

User:MBH/ftb.js has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well very well (talk) 03:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russia Is My History exhibition hall (Yekaterinburg) 04.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russia Is My History exhibition hall (Yekaterinburg) 04.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 08:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Yekaterinburg metal TV Tower 01.jpg

File:Yekaterinburg metal TV Tower 01.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Yekaterinburg metal TV Tower 02.jpg

File:Yekaterinburg metal TV Tower 02.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Revert

BTW, there was a discussion on the Village Pump recently and the consensus there was that the "associated with" categories are nonsensical and don't follow the guidelines. I don't care if you want to put the logo in a more descriptive category then I did, but Category:Logos associated with nuclear industry should be deleted anyway. Adamant1 (talk) 04:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

@Adamant1 shouldn't you delete also Category:Logos associated with technology and entire Category:Logos by association? MBH 05:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Not every single "by association" category is worth getting rid. Just the more nonsensical ones that are pointless and/or duplicate exiting category schemes. That said, I've been going through Category:Logos associated with technology and I'll probably nominate it for deletion once the logos in it have been dealt with. I'm only one editor and it's not a simple process though. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:09, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Rollback right given

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Abzeronow (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

per your request, I've semiprotected File:Fortnite at E3 2018 (41868702965).jpg for a year. Abzeronow (talk) 20:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Коньковские пруды

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above: not including year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; not notifying; and not transcluding. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar provided by the AjaxQuickDelete gadget per subpolicy procedures COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you MUST follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of subpolicy procedure COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

@Jeff G. I just forgot category speedy deletion template. I tried {{ds|reason}} and {{sd|reason}}, both did what I don't want. Please, remember me, what template should be used for category speedy deletion? MBH 15:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Category deletion

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Category:Aircraft at the Aviation Museum of the UMMC Museum Complex, it was a structured sub-category of Category: Collections of aircraft by museum which currently has 390 members. The aircraft in this museum can no longer be easily found. Nimbus227 (talk) 06:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

@Nimbus227 I don't understand: renamed category is still a member of "Collections of aircraft by museum". MBH 11:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
It is not in the consensus format of 'Aircraft at x museum' plus there is no redirect from the deleted category, users can not find the category by typing in 'Aircraft at x museum' which auto completes when enough text has been entered. These categories are meant specifically/only for aircraft exhibits, general interior images are categorised under the museum parent category and other exhibits are also kept there or sometimes in 'Collections of x museum' like Category:Collections of the National Museum of the United States Air Force. Further, the aircraft engine categories are a sub-category of the 'aircraft at' categories, users find the categories by first searching for the aircraft category. Category:Aircraft engines at the Aviation Museum of the UMMC Museum Complex is now equally difficult to find. Nimbus227 (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
The Commons policy not being followed here is Commons:Categories#Selectivity principle, We should not classify items which are related to different subjects in the same category. There should be one category per topic; multi-subject categories should be avoided. The category name should be unambiguous and not homonymous. Nimbus227 (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
You could create a redirect from old name. My reason for renaming was I upload a set of files depicting not aircraft, but just building interior, for example elevators. If you think it's important, you could split the category into "interior" and its subcategory "aircrafts in". MBH 12:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
I do think that it's a very important Commons policy. I have restored the category and re-added the images that were in it, they need further categorisation by aircraft type in good time. 'Interior of x museum' does not have a parent category in Category:Museums that I can see. Many museums, including this one, have indoor and outdoor exhibits and it would be over-categorisation to split them into indoor and outdoor categories. The preposition 'at' is normally used in museum category names because it covers both indoor and outdoor cases where 'in' limits the category to indoor images only. Nimbus227 (talk) 15:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
@Nimbus227 I also propose to shorten all category names from ".... Aviation Museum of the UMMC Museum Complex" to ".... UMMC Aviation Museum". If you're not object, I will do it with my bot. MBH 10:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Please don't do that, use the talk page of each category to propose and discuss first, consensus to change is needed. Some names are long but not many, they are usually abbreviated in file names for convenience. Often, the shortened English version of a museum name is given on its website, that is the title that is usually used for categories. The category title should also align with the Wikipedia article if it has one, this makes Wikidata and Commons category linking simple (Wikipedia pages are placed in maintenance categories where the names do not align). Nimbus227 (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
@Nimbus227 I still don't see reasons not to do that. In Russian Wikipedia we assume consensus isn't needed to change a page created yesterday, because such page has no consensus version. Your opinion against my opinion, there is no "consensus version". This sub-museum (Aviation) has no official English title, and shortening category name without loss in meaning is valid reason for renaming for me. I already did it on Category:Interior of the UMMC Aviation Museum. MBH 12:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
The word 'all' was used implying that you were going to change all long established category names to your own preferred versions with a bot. No objection to shortening the UMMC categories only. No need to keep pinging me, I watch all pages that I edit. Nimbus227 (talk) 12:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Tsentralny -> Central

Где обсуждалось, почему сделан перевод вместо транскрибирования? Анастасия Львоваru/en 13:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

1) Я одно время писал на здешний ру-форум свои предложения о массовых переименованиях, например по ВДНХ, откуда вынес понимание, что здесь - всем пофиг (на мои темы никто не ответил, я массово переименовал ВДНХ - не было ни слова в ответ). 2) Я регулярно вижу на складе, что если ру-объект назван словом, заимствованным из западноевропейских языков, его название на складе нередко делают приближенным к оригинальному слову, чтобы его было легче понимать иноязычным. Пример - ТЦ Дирижабль в Ёбурге, чья категория названа Dirigible. Здесь - идеальный случай для этого, нынешнее название категории одновременно осталось полностью понятно всем русскоязычным - и одновременно приобрело понятность остальным 95% посетителей и участников Склада. 3) Это последний переименованный мною на складе Центральный - я задержал его переименование лишь из-за объёма работы. Все остальные складовские и англовичные центральные я переименовал часть - год, а часть - два года назад. MBH 15:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Названия примерно равноценные, поэтому, похоже, никто из работающих с ОКН Петербурга пока не рвётся отменять одно в пользу другого, потому что нет смысла второй раз делать большое количество работы; но сейчас сломалась вся привязка категорий к Викигиду и его базе ОКН. Вероятно, AVSbot справится с задачей, а может, и нет -- скоро узнаем; поэтому пожалуйста, учитывайте, что подобные действия могут затрагивать большее количество ссылок, чем видно в whatlinkshere, и ради бога, не продолжайте в сторону Science Avenue вместо Проспекта Науки. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Ну, в Красноярске я таки переименовал неудобоваримые "Pr. Mira" и "Pl. Mira" в "Peace Avenue" и "Peace Square", но по другим городам массово делать подобного не планирую. Если категория названа хотя бы с родовым словом (street, square...) английским - транслит имени собственного я не трогаю. MBH 18:18, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Vysotsky skyscraper observation deck 13.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vysotsky skyscraper observation deck 13.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 22:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 12:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 08:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Russian National Library 17.jpg

File:Russian National Library 17.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.216.218.77 16:19, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Матч памяти легенд «Динамо». 15 ноября 2017 года — 812851.jpg

File:Матч памяти легенд «Динамо». 15 ноября 2017 года — 812851.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Love Point sex shop in Moscow 01.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Love Point sex shop in Moscow 01.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 06:25, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Apothecary Garden 76.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Apothecary Garden 76.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 11:25, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Apothecary Garden 09.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Apothecary Garden 09.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 11:26, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Greenhouses of the Aptekarsky garden 03.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Greenhouses of the Aptekarsky garden 03.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 11:26, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Palm greenhouse (Aptekarsky garden) 09.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Palm greenhouse (Aptekarsky garden) 09.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 11:26, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Palm greenhouse (Aptekarsky garden) 05.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  မြန်မာဘာသာ  polski  русский  slovenščina  ไทย  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Palm greenhouse (Aptekarsky garden) 05.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 11:26, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. A.Savin 11:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Предупреждение о неконсенсусных переименованиях категорий

--Kaganer (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

File:ИИ-азбука Русской Википедии 2.png

File:ИИ-азбука Русской Википедии 2.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dronebogus (talk) 08:04, 16 March 2026 (UTC)