User talk:Funforme3

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Funforme3!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Midway

Please be more careful with your category work. There is no reason to merge the categories for Midway Yard and the Midway maintenance facility, as they occupy separate periods in history. Additionally, there is no indication that the current yard has the proper name "Midway Maintenance Facility". Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

They do have consistent names throughout the time periods as well as currently the yard is called the Groton Maintenance of Way Base. So not even Midway Yard. I was going to correct the capitalization seeing as other pages appear to have it correct but this one. On top of that the maps I have from library of congress do say it "Midway" however everywhere else I look as well as on the documents saved image it says "Midway Railyard". So in fact the page shouldn't be called Midway Yard at all. Funforme3 (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
For the modern facility, I cannot find any evidence for commons use of either of the capitalized proper names "Groton Maintenance of Way Base" or "Midway Maintenance Facility". Can you provide any evidence of either of these being the official name? If not, then we should use "Midway maintenance facility" as a descriptive name. This facility seems to have been constructed during the Amtrak era; while it occupies part of the former yard site, it was decades removed from the New Haven's yard. They should have separate Commons categories to avoid confusion.
Similarly, I cannot find any evidence of "Midway Railyard" being a proper name for the New Haven's yard at the site. Edward Ozog's thorough article in Shoreliner (1981 vol. 12 issue 2) uses "Midway yard"; other modern references seem to mostly use "Midway Yard". What sources are you getting your name from? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:09, 9 May 2026 (UTC)