Commons:Kandydatury do grafik na medal

Prezentacja grafik kandydatów w innych językach:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文（中国大陆） | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Na tej stronie prezentowani są kandydaci do wyróżnionych grafik (na polskiej Wikipedii "Grafika na medal"). Zwróć uwagę, że nie jest to samo co Grafika dnia, która jest inną forma wyróżnienia.

Aby obejrzeć archiwum poprzednio nominowanych grafik, przejdź na stronę: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.

Istnieje także chronologiczna lista wyróżnionych grafik. Zobacz także: Kandydatów do grafik wysokiej jakości oraz Okiem fotografów.

Formalności

Nominacja

Jeżeli uważasz, że znalazłeś/aś zdjęcie lub stworzyłeś/aś grafikę, która może być uważana jako wartościowa, z odpowiednim opisem i licencją, skopiuj nazwę grafiki w to pole (zawierającą prefiks File:), po tym jak tekst będzie już w polu:


Potem musisz ręcznie wprowadzić link do stworzonej strony na górze Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Głosowanie

Aby wyrazić swoje poparcie, możesz użyć następujących szablonów:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),

lub aby wyrazić swoją dezaprobatę:

  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),

Możesz także użyć:

  • Neutralny: {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • Komentarz: {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • Informacja: {{Info}} ( Info).
  • Pytanie: {{Question}} ( Question),
  • Prośba: {{Request}} ( Request).

Proszę, postaraj się napisać kilka słów, dlaczego podoba Ci się (lub nie podoba) dane zdjęcie - szczególnie, gdy głosujesz przeciw. Pamiętaj również, aby złożyć swój podpis (~~~~).

Zasady prezentacji grafik kandydatów

Zasady główne

  1. Po zakończeniu okresu głosowania wynik będzie ogłoszony 15. dnia po nominacji (tak jak jest to pokazane w tabelce czasowej poniżej). A więc okres głosowania to dwa tygodnie (plus godziny do końca 14. dnia). Głosy dodane 15. dnia i później nie są liczone.
  2. Nominacje zgłaszane przez anonimowych uczestników są mile widziane.
  3. Wkład do dyskusji przez anonimowych uczestników jest również mile widziany.
  4. Głosy oddane przez anonimowych uczestników nie są liczone.
  5. Nominacje nie liczą się jako głosy. Poparcie musi być wyraźnie określone.
  6. Nominowani mogą wycofać swoje nominowane zdjęcia w każdej chwili - pisząc: "I withdraw my nomination" lub dodając tekst {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Pamiętaj, że celem projektu Wikimedia Commons jest zapewnienie centralnego repozytorium dla grafik używanych przez wszystkie projekty Wikimedia, łącznie z możliwymi przyszłymi projektami. To nie jest po prostu depozyt dla grafik Wikipedii, więc grafiki nie powinny być tutaj oceniane na podstawie ich przydatności dla tego projektu.
  8. Zdjęcia mogą być usuwane z listy, jeżeli nie mają żadnego poparcia (nie licząc nominujących) w 5. dniu (dzień nominacji + 5).
  9. Zdjęcie oznaczone szablonem {{FPX}} może zostać usunięte z listy po 24 godzinach od zastosowania tego znacznika, pod warunkiem że nie ma ono głosów popierających poza nominującym.

Zasady publikacji grafik

Grafika kandydata zostanie umieszczona, jeżeli będzie spełniać następujące warunki:

  1. Odpowiednia licencja (co jest oczywiste)
  2. Grafika musi mieć przynajmniej 7 głosów poparcia
  3. Podział głosów popierających/przeciwnych musi mieścić się przynajmniej w stosunku 2/1 (większość dwóch - trzecich)
  4. Nie mogą być wybrane dwie różne wersje tej samej grafiki - wybrana zostanie wersja z większą liczbą oddanych głosów.

Zobacz jak postępować ze starymi nominacjami: Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#Co zrobić kiedy głosowanie się zakończy.

Usuwanie zdjęć prezentowanych kandydatów

Nadgodzinowa zamiana standardów zamieszczonej grafiki. Może się tak zdarzyć, że dla niektórych grafik formalne wystarczająco dobre nie jest już aktualne. To jest dla listy zdjęć, które wierzysz, że nie zasługują dłużej by być prezentowaną grafiką. To wymaga 2/3 głosów większości (i minimum 5 głosów) zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy prezentowanych zdjęć. Jeżeli nie ma 2/3 głosów zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy, nominacja zostaje jako prezentowana grafika. Dla nich głosuj "Zachowaj"  Keep (to zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką) lub "Usuń z listy"  Delist (to nie zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką). Proszę zapewnij link do oryginalnej FP nominacji (to pojawi się pod Links na stronie opisu grafiki). Inaczej te same zasady jak te powyżej wchodzą w życie. Proszę użyj tego linku this link aby dodać nowego możliwego do usunięcia kandydata.

Wskazówki dla nominujących

Poniżej możesz znaleźć niektóre ”informacje” na temat zasad, które zdjęcia powinny spełniać:

  • Rozdzielczość – Grafiki zlokalizowane na Commons mogą być używane nie tylko do oglądania na ekranie. Mogą zostać również użyte do drukowania lub oglądania na monitorach o bardzo wysokiej rozdzielczości. Nie możemy także przewidzieć, jakie urządzenia zostaną użyte w przyszłości, a więc ważne jest, aby zdjęcia, które są nominowane, miały tak dużą rozdzielczość jak tylko jest to możliwe. Rozdzielczość powinna być przynajmniej na poziomie 2 mln pikseli (np. 2000x1000), co wydaje się rozsądne na obecną chwilę.
  • Ostrość – każdy ważny przedmiot na grafice powinien być odpowiednio ostry (nie rozmyty).
  • Pierwszy plan i drugi plan – obiekty pierwszoplanowe i drugoplanowe mogą przeszkadzać i odwracać uwagę od głównej zawartości grafiki. Powinieneś/aś sprawdzić czy obiekt z przodu nie zasłania innych ważnych elementów i czy coś na drugim planie nie rozprasza kompozycji (np. gdy światło latarni nie świeci nad czyjąś głową).
  • Głównie Jakość – grafiki nominowane powinny mieć dobrą techniczną jakość.
  • Wartość – naszym głównym celem jest prezentowanie najbardziej wartościowych grafik ze wszystkich dostępnych. Zdjęcia powinny być na swój sposób wyjątkowe, więc bądź tego świadomy/a:
    • prawie wszystkie wschody słońca są ładne i większość takich zdjęć nie jest inna w swojej esencji od innych,
    • zdjęcia nocy są ładne, ale zasadniczo więcej detali można zobaczyć na zdjęciach zrobionych w czasie dnia.
    • piękne nie zawsze musi znaczyć wartościowe.

Nie każda zasada musi być dopasowana, np. grafika może mieć niewielką rozdzielczość, ponieważ wyższa rozdzielczość nie może już być zrobiona (temat zdjęcia już nie żyje lub nie istnieje) lub wydarzenie już nigdy więcej się nie powtórzy.

Wskazówki do oceniania grafik

Istnieje kilka kryteriów dla oceniania grafik.

Z technicznej strony mamy ekspozycję, kompozycję, kontrolę ruchu i głębokość pola.

  • Ekspozycja odnosi się do zamkniętego diagramu kombinacji, który wykonuje grafikę z stonowaną krzywą, która jest idealnie zdolna do reprezentacji szczegółów cieni i punktów szczytowych w grafice. To nazywamy poziomem. Grafiki mogą być na niskiej stronie stonowanej krzywej (niski zasięg), środkowej (środkowy zasięg) lub wysokiej stronie (wysoki zasięg). Kamery cyfrowe (lub grafiki) mają bardziej skurczony poziom niż film. Brak detalu cienia nie jest koniecznie charakterystyczny dla negatywu. Faktycznie może to być część zaplanowanego efektu. Wypalone szczytowe punkty w dużych częściach rozpraszają element.
  • Kompozycja odnosi się do uzgodnienia elementów w grafice. ”Zasada Trójpodziału” jest dobrą wskazówką dla kompozycji i jest odziedziczona ze szkoły malarstwa. Ideą tą jest rozdzielenie grafiki z dwiema poziomymi i dwiema pionowymi liniami, w ten sposób dzieląc grafikę w trzecie poziomo i pionowo. Centrowanie tematu jest zawsze uważane za złą praktykę. Tematy zainteresowania są zawsze umieszczone w jednym z ‘’punktów zainteresowania’’, gdzie poziome i pionowe linie przecinają się (cztery takie punkty przecięcia są stworzone). Poziomy nie są nigdy umieszczone w środku, bo ‘’przecinają’’ grafikę na połowę. Są umieszczone albo w górnej lub dolnej poziomej linii. Główną ideą jest nie umieszczanie tematu w centrum.
  • Kontrola ruchu odnosi się do sposobu, w jaki emocja jest odwzorowana w Grafice. Emocja może być zamrożona lub rozmazana. Przy czym jedna w cale nie jest lepsza od drugiej. To intencja odwzorowania jest ważna. Ruch jest ustosunkowany w obiektach na Grafice. Np. Fotografując samochód wyścigowy, który pojawia się zamrożony w relacji do tła, nie daje nam poczucia prędkości ruchu, a więc technika dyktuje reprezentacje samochodu w zamrożony sposób, ale z zamazanym tłem, aby stworzyć poczucie ruchu, ta technika to ‘’panoramowanie’’. Z drugiej strony zaprezentowanie koszykarza w skoku nie wymaga użycia tej techniki w związku z jego nienaturalną pozycją, co automatycznie sprawia że zdjęcie jest prawidłowe.
  • Głębia ostrości (DOF – Depth Of Field) odnosi się do części ostrości z przodu i za głównym tematem. Głębia ostrości jest wybrana odnośnie do specyficznych potrzeb każdego zdjęcia. Duża lub mała głębia ostrości może zwiększyć lub podważyć jakość grafiki. Niska głębia ostrości może być użyta dla przyciągnięcia uwagi do głównego tematu, oddzielając go od otoczenia. Wysoka głębia ostrości może być użyta do uwydatnienia przestrzeni. Soczewki krótkoogniskowe (szerokokątne) zapewniają większą głębię ostrości, i odwrotnie, soczewki o długich ogniskowych (teleobiektywy) mają małą głębię ostrości. Najmniejsze przesłony (zasunięte) powiększają głębię i odwrotnie, otwarte zmniejszają ją.

Na elementach graficznych mamy kształt, objętość, kolor, teksturę, perspektywę, równowagę, proporcję itd.

  • Kształt odnosi się do konturów głównych tematów.
  • Objętość odnosi się do trójwymiarowej jakości tematu. Jest to osiągane używając światła ze strony (z boku). Przeciwnie do generalnego poglądu, przednie światło nie jest najlepszym światłem. Ono dąży do spłaszczenia tematu. Najlepszym światło dzienne jest wczesnym rankiem lub późnym popołudniem.
  • Kolor jest ważny. Przesycenie kolorami nie jest dobre.
  • Tekstura odnosi się do jakości powierzchni tematu. Jest ona wzmagana przez boczne światło… to jest ”wyczucie” dotyku…
  • Perspektywa odnosi się do ”kąta” towarzyszącego przez linie, które znikają w znikającym punkcie, który może, lecz nie musi być wewnątrz grafiki.
  • Równowaga odnosi się do porozumienia tematów w grafice, które mogą dać albo równą wagę lub wydawać się cięższe z jednej strony.
  • Proporcja odnosi się do relacji wielkości tematów w zdjęciu. Generalnie dążymy do reprezentowania małych obiektów, małych w relacjach do innych, ale dobrą techniką jest reprezentowanie małych obiektów przeciwieństw do naturalnych rozmiarów wzajemnego stosunku. Na przykład, mały kwiat skupia większe zastanowienie niż wielka góra…. Nazywamy to odwróceniem skali.

Nie wszystkie elementy muszą być obecne. Niektóre fotografie mogą być osądzone na postawie indywidualnych charakterystyk, np. grafika może być o kolorze lub teksturze, lub kolorze i teksturze, itd.

Symboliczne znaczenie lub powiązanie…. Tu właśnie zaczyna się wojna na opinie…. Złe zdjęcie bardzo trudnego tematu jest lepsze niż zdjęcie dobre zwyczajnego tematu. Dobre zdjęcie trudnego tematu jest nadzwyczajną fotografią.

Grafiki mogą być zrobione kulturowo stronniczo przez fotografującego i/lub obserwatora. Znaczenie grafiki powinno być ocenione zgodnie z kulturalnym kontekstem grafiki, nie przez kulturalny kontekst obserwatora. Grafika „przemawia" do ludzi i ma siłę, aby wywoływać emocje takie jak wrażliwość, wściekłość, odrzucenie, radość, smutek itp. Dobre fotografie nie są ograniczone do wywoływania przyjemnych wrażeń….

Ponad Wszystko bądź kulturalny

Proszę nie zapomnij, że grafika, którą oceniasz, jest czyjąś pracą. Unikaj używania fraz takich jak „to wygląda strasznie” i „nienawidzę tego”. Jeżeli musisz być przeciw - rób to z rozwagą. Pamiętaj także, że twoja znajomość języka może nie być taka sama jak kogoś innego. Dobieraj swoje słowa z uwagą.

Miłego oceniania… i pamiętaj…. wszystkie zasady mogą być złamane.

Spis treści


Kandydatury do przyznania medalu

Odśwież stronę: purge this page's cache

File:ILanz, plaats in Graubünden. 27-09-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 04:37:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Obama and Biden await updates on bin Laden.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 21:18:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, along with members of the national security team, receive an update on Operation Neptune Spear.

File:Road in Valley of Fire.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 18:42:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winding road in Valley of Fire State Park (Nevada)

File:Decorated one-humped Camel, Camelus dromedarius, at Puri Sea Beach, Odisha, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 15:11:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:RepartidorPEdidosYa-MDP.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 13:55:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A PedidosYA delivery driver checking his cell phone and sunbathing on the beach in the summer of 2020 in Mar del Plata, Argentina
yes...but this photo is in Argentina not Brazil...PR tag added just in case --Ezarateesteban 17:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing featureable here, sorry. The decision to put the rest of the image in black and white is odd to me — it isn't even that well done to be honest, looks like a layer was hastily brushed over(e.g. random ground spots and corner of chair). TheBritinator (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Mödlareuth 20251003 HOF0374 RAW-Export.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 08:19:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mödlareuth with inner German border and watch tower, taken on German reunification day

File:Панорама велопешеходного моста через Нагатинский затон.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 21:42:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nagatinskiy Zaton footbridge

File:Dubai Sunset (5614220391).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 15:41:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sun setting over downtown Dubai. Taken from Festival City.

File:Cathedral of Reims (17).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 12:41:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Our Lady cathedral in Reims, Marne, France

File:Plage d'Antigues (17).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 12:38:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plage d'Antigues in commune of Port-Louis, Guadeloupe, France

File:Fresco I in Sevnica Castle hall, Slovenia.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 12:13:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fresco in Sevnica Castle hall, Slovenia

File:Armreliquar-Karl-der-Große-Domschatz-Aachen-2026.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 10:51:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arm reliquary of Charlemagne in Aachen Cathedral Treasury
  • @Mituxy: Why don't you support your own picture? Yann (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
     Support Thank you for this hint, Yann I checked the rules again, and it seems that supporting one’s own nominations is allowed after all, even though I am still very new here. Mituxy (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment This must be quite tricky to photograph and the background has been done well. Perhaps the highlights could be reduced and the shadows lifted? Unfortunately, I don't think your Z50 has focus-shift-shooting like your friend's Z8. That gives him an advantageǃ But your shot of the Margaret crown is much sharper than his recently-promoted FPC and I prefer your slightly lower PoV. Without focus-stacking, the bottom of the relic is blurred. Although, it doesn't matter for Commons FPC, but I would put the image into the Charlemagne deWiki article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you for the kind and detailed feedback, Charlesjsharp also about the crown — maybe I will nominate the crown too, just to tease my friend a little. :)
    Unfortunately, the Z50 does not have focus shift. I will try later to add the image to the article on Charlemagne — thank you for that suggestion as well. Mituxy (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:15, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Detail at top and bottom not at FP level IMHO, sorry. Too shallow DoF. Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poco is right, I’m afraid.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cala du Chiesa - îles Lavezzi.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 09:12:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Cala du Chiesa, beach of the Archipelago of Lavezzi (Corsica)
@Tournasol7: Do you support or...? Yann (talk) 13:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Yes, sorry, my mistake. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:26, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Gullfoss, Iceland, 20230501 0949 3809.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 03:39:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gullfoss waterfall in southern Iceland in early spring, with patches of remaining snow

File:Самарканд.Мавзолей Аксарай,интеръер.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 00:40:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brilliant interior of Aksaray Mausoleum, Samarkand.

File:Beijing forbidden city Belvedere of Embodying Benevolence-20071018-RM-142403.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 22:14:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Belvedere of Embodying Benevolence in the forbidden city in Beijing

File:Goru Bihu at Mangaldai.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 09:40:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A scene of the ritual washing of cows in the river, and ritually touched with Litsea salicifolia (Dighloti) branches during the festival of Goru Bihu.

File:104 Juvenile South African ostrich in the Kalahari Desert of Namibia Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 09:04:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile South African ostrich in the Kalahari Desert of Namibia

File:179 Male African bush elephants drinking in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 09:01:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male African bush elephants drinking in Etosha National Park

File:Lantana-Sitia-Crete-Greece.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 05:28:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lantana camara. Sitia, Crete, Greece.

File:Fratercula arctica, Borgarfjörður eystri, Iceland, 20240717 1152 1838.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 04:14:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Atlantic puffin carrying seaweed and vegetation

File:1950s LEGO Cadillac.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 18:22:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I had those thoughts too, but if it's a real car but not an unfree toy, very likely there is an exception, even though it has been made with Lego blocks. The object could also be considered a 3D art object (not sure here), and Canada has FOP for that. Юрий Д.К. 20:02, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  • FoP could cover that if it is permanently displayed. But if it is a running vehicle, how could it is permanently displayed? Yann (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    @Yann At least in Germany "permanent" means that it is always in public space, but does not need to be stationary. This covers also advertisements on buses. See "Kussmundurteil" --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
    I don't think that the fact that a vehicle is moving says that it is [vehicle] merely temporary displayed. It still should be regarded as permanently displayed. Юрий Д.К. 16:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Winter in Tatras, Poland (55156292085).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 18:14:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Ritchey–Chrétien imaging in a tennis court.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 17:53:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An amateur 20 cm (8 in) Ritchey–Chrétien telescope imaging the Dumbbell Nebula in a tennis court, behind the backdrop of Sagittarius and Scorpius at dawn. Accessories include a monochrome camera, filter wheel, off-axis guider, electronic autofocuser (EAF), a control PC, and glow-in-the-dark tape for visibility. Messier 7 (Ptolemy's Cluster), Messier 8 (the Lagoon Nebula), and the Large Sagittarius Star Cloud are visible defocused in the background.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Telescopes
  •  Info My own Ritchey–Chrétien telescope imaging the Dumbbell Nebula at early dawn in a tennis court, behind Sagittarius, Scorpius, and the core of the Milky Way. Created, uploaded, and nominated by yours truly —brainandforce [yap] 17:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Abstain as author. —brainandforce [yap] 17:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I already have an FP of this telescope, but the lighting is much better here (thanks, light pollution?). I wasn't sure whether this should be a delist/replace nomination or not.
  •  Support I think this is much better than the other picture. Yann (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sprinklers Garlic Fields Mallikorai Nilgiris Apr26 A7CR 10661.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 14:34:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sprinklers watering freshly planted garlic fields, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India

File:Indian elephant in Kaziranga National Park March 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 08:17:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indian elephant (Elephas maximus indicus) - juvenile

File:IMG8529-3 Hotel Astor Private Pier, Limone Sul Garda, Italy, 2017-04.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 01:01:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The private pier of Hotel Astor at Lake Garda, Italy.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
  •  Info A dreamy view onto the private pier of Hotel Astor at Lake Garda in Italy. The backlit green seawater and the pink blossoms on the tree convey an almost unnatural color impression which is quite striking to me. However, the hues were not significantly altered - this is very close to the natural colors of this interestingly-lit early-spring scene. All by me. -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very interesting and original. Maybe a slight crop above and right would help? --Jebulon (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Jebulon--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de Jesús, Bregenz, Austria, 2022-10-22, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 21:05:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Jesus, Bregenz, Austria

File:Ireland Clonmacnoise BW 2025-09-09 17-08-12.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 18:35:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ireland, Clonmacnoise, Temple Fingin und McCarthy's Tower
✓ Done Please check again. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Philippine tarsier (Carlito syrichta fraterculus) Bohol 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 17:10:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Philippine tarsier (Carlito syrichta fraterculus)
  • No worries Tagooty I've a bunch of images of this species, I'll upload them within 2 months I hope Poco a poco (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Possibly the most bizarre oppose yet, from a regular contributor who has just supported an elephant image for FP when we have 20+ already. And how is it similar to the other? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Jakubhal 04:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Philippine frogmouth (Batrachostomus septimus septimus) female and male Bohol.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 17:10:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Philippine frogmouth (Batrachostomus septimus septimus) female and male
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podargidae (Frogmouths)
  •  Info A nocturnal bird endemic to the Philippines. Only a couple of other images on Commons. No FPs of this Order of birds. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Conditional support Great photo. It is rare to see a pair of the same species in the same shot. Here, the birds almost mirror each other, which is neat. However, the AI processing is much too high for my taste and detail is unnatural. I prefer natural noise to artificially enhanced texture. JayCubby (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    ✓ Done New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you. Definitely better. JayCubby (talk) 13:11, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support These nocturnal birds are very hard to find and photograph during the day. -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:09, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Per JayCubby and Tisha. --Tagooty (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice mirror image, Tweedledum and Tweedledee --Wilfredor (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 09:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Clearly not an easy capture, nicely done. —brainandforce [yap] 20:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Gzzz zz 20:07, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Biskupská kupa tower, Zlaté Hory Highlands (2025) 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 12:48:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Biskupská kupa tower, Zlaté Hory Highlands. Czech-polish border

File:Pinheiros, Linha 9-Esmeralda da CPTM , São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 11:43:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pinheiros, Linha 9-Esmeralda da CPTM , São Paulo, Brazil

Five-storied Pagoda, Haguro-san

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 07:49:02 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

Crested Bunting

Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 06:09:25 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

File:Oceanus (Trevi fountain).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 19:49:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oceanus (Trevi fountain)
  •  Comment That is even more strange. Suppose he want that kind. --Mile (talk) 09:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I like it. TheBritinator (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment The horizontal perspective correction is not perfect.--Jebulon (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    J’ai essayé de trouver un guide, mais pour moi, tout a l’air symétrique Wilfredor (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    La corniche, tout en haut…--Jebulon (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    C'est fait, stp, dis-moi si ça marche pour toi. Wilfredor (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    Merci c’est mieux.--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    Merci a toi Wilfredor (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 11:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Basílica de San Nazario, Carcasona, Francia, 2023-01-08, DD 61-63 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 19:32:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High altar of the Basilica of Saints Nazarius and Celsus, citadel of Carcassonne, France.

File:Wolt delivery man having a rest (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 19:16:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wolt delivery man having a rest (Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
  •  Info Wolt delivery man having a rest (Belgrade, Serbia). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Mile (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I prefer photos that tell stories over photos of spectacular monuments. It takes more skill to find something special in the everyday than to photograph something that is already impressive in itself. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this picture does not tell me nothing. In my opinion, I don’t find anything special here.--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jebulon. Nothing compelling here. Gatoclass (talk) 23:36, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jebulon. TheBritinator (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Yes, tell a story. But it looks like yellowish. Why not plain black and white? Yann (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Fagus sylvatica with autumn leaf color in Biosphärenreservat Rhön - Still.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 16:23:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fagus sylvatica with autumn leaf color. Taken in the biosphere reserve Rhoen in Germany November 2023.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
  •  Info Fagus sylvatica with autumn leaf color. Taken in the biosphere reserve Rhoen in Germany November 2023. Created by Markusmachtphotos – uploaded by Markusmachtphotos – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Zquid (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support A really beautiful photo that really captures your attention. I might have just moved the tree trunk a little more toward the lower right corner. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A deserved 1st prize winner at WLE, no doubt about its striking composition and visual impact. However, at full resolution the technical quality falls short of FP standards. Visible compression artifacts and loss of fine detail are apparent, particularly given the high resolution (~42 MP) combined with a small file size. The technical execution does not match the image's otherwise exceptional quality. Sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Radomianin It won 1st place, it could won, since jury is more watching thumbs than true size. So this is what i say "good in thumb - bad in full" or other way around. I could agree with technical, as i see, wide zoom is used, going into fisheye specter. Doing shot on 14 mm (@FF), f/13, 1/100s and ISO 2000 is not good choice. Or ideal. I see Exposure Program was Manual. So mistake probably. Due to humidity i dont think he could capture objects sharp far from camera. --Mile (talk) 09:11, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The compression artifacts are bad enough to be disqualifying, IMO. Can you dig up a higher quality version of this image? I'd support that for sure. —brainandforce [yap] 17:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    @Brainandforce, I am able to reduce the JPEG artifacts using a neutral network, but if you have a decent GPU, I'll send you the program (it will take a couple hours to run but maybe 15 minutes on a decent graphics card) JayCubby (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Beautiful photo with some technical problems per users above. I've decided to  Weak support this Юрий Д.К. 20:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support As photo art.--Ermell (talk) 09:35, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Quality is too low, unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Certainly a nice photo, but not up to FP standards when it comes to the technical aspects. This is very unfortunate, as there's simply no reason to downsize it that much. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2026-03-22 D500-2040 Achim-Lammerts Windpark-Hatzenbühl.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 08:17:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The small wind farm near Hatzenbühl in the municipality of Jockgrim (Southern Palatinate) on a windy day.
Windy places do not inherently have "more" clouds. But grey on grey... And a lot of empty space here. -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree, it looks too ordinary to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I love the idea (a stopped turbine with moving ones in the background, great use case for an ND filter) and the composition (for me, the negative space works well), but agree with Basile about the grey clouds. Have you tried increasing whites just on the background, to avoid clipping the wind towers and blades? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing featurable here imo, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you very much for your suggestions, @Julesvernex2. I’ve already tried a few things in that direction, but the rotating wind turbines are almost impossible to mask. Right now, I don’t feel like working on the photo any further, and with the nice weather, I’d rather spend my time on botanical topics.
    I took and nominated this photo because I find it funny and think it’s a nice change of pace from the usual topics here. It may not appeal to everyone, and some might even find it boring. That’s fine with me — at least those are honest opinions.
    What I can’t get behind, however, are comments like “too much empty space” or “the gray clouds don’t help much”. Frankly, I consider that an unqualified statement you’d expect from a layperson. Maybe it’s just a translation error.
    Here, wind turbines several dozen meters high are photographed from the ground, and I think I’ve managed the composition quite well. What would you expect as a background with this POV? Some kind of aircraft on approach? A murmuration of birds? At any rate, the low-pressure system that had built up from the west fits very well into the image’s narrative.
    I’m leaving the nomination up anyway and would appreciate feedback that goes beyond mere grumbling or snide remarks. Thanks! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Clouds and sky are fine. I find the center composition not the best. Did you try to use the rule of third? --Yann (talk) 09:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you very much, Yann. I usually compose my images based on the “golden ratio” or the Fibonacci sequence (as far as possible). That didn't quite work out here due to the dimensions of the subject. Right a bit less and therefore left a bit more space would have been better, sure. Cropping to a 4:3 or 5:4 aspect ratio doesn't really offer any advantages, so I left it as is, leaving the final decision up to the end user. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose You need more time to get blades around and around. At day, this must be more than some 15 stops, i think. Colors could be more vivid or enlightened. --Mile (talk) 10:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    I also took some shots of this subject with much longer exposure times, but I discarded them because I didn’t want the rotor blades to appear as circles. A full rotation would have taken about 20–30 seconds, which I wouldn’t have been able to manage at all in daylight. Have you ever tried that in practice, or is it just theory? What’s your experience with variable ND filters and the sensors and light meters in modern cameras? 😉 Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Kronborg April 2026 05.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 08:11:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kronborg Castle.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Denmark
  •  Info Kronborg Castle with its surrounding moats and defensive ramparts. The castle is one of Northern Europe’s most impressive Renaissance castles and famously serves as the setting for Shakespeare’s drama Hamlet. Located just six kilometers from Denmark’s historic archenemy Sweden, across the Öresund strait, Kronborg has always been heavily fortified and remained an active military base well into the 20th century. Somewhat surprisingly, we still have no FPs of this remarkable world heritage site.
  • Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice composition and lighting of an interesting object. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support It just invites you to take in all the detail and colors. —brainandforce [yap] 15:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 17:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't think this was the best POV for this subject. We see mostly an uninteresting brick wall and little from the castle Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per vote above --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support In my opinion, the photo from this side is also very impressive.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support-- JackyM59 (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco. Gatoclass (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I've been sitting on this for a few days and while I think it's a very well taken photo I'm not sold by the angle, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @ArildV F-number f/9; bricks are fine, but i more focus on Fort, they lean too. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are several reasons for the composition, the ramparts are very close to the castle and the area closest to the castle (inside the innermost moat) is also not accessible. So there is no way to get a picture of the castle without some part being obscured. The second reason is that the castle is not just a castle; it is also a military fortress that controlled the entrance to the Sound and the Baltic Sea for centuries. So the walls and moats are very much part of the historical value, integrity and authenticity of the site.--ArildV (talk) 10:36, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Arco Antico (Castelmola).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2026 at 17:42:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arco Antico (Castelmola)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
  •  Info: the ancient Roman entrance to the town of Castelmola, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment the shadow, left corner...--Jebulon (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Well composed rustic scene that invites imaginative engagement. The stonework is interesting with its different colours and highly varied shapes and sizes, and the angle of light highlights its textures. My one quibble would be that the caption, "Ancient arch", is insufficient. Gatoclass (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks for the feedback! As far as I could find, it doesn't actually have a proper name; it is simply called Arco Antico: I did expand the captions a bit though. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I fail to see something extraordinary here, and I was also there one year ago. Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ergaki, Mountain lake Skazka, Rock formations, Sayan Mountains, Russia.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2026 at 17:33:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mountain lake and rock formations in the upper reaches of the Kebezh River, Sayan Mountains.

File:China Tianjin 5227691.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2026 at 10:54:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Concert hall in Tianjin

File:Spaceship Earth (art002e008487).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2026 at 22:06:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NASA astronaut and Artemis II mission specialist Christina Koch peers out of one of the Orion spacecraft's main cabin windows, looking back at Earth, as the crew travels towards the Moon.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space_exploration#Astronauts
  •  Info created by NASA – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Señor Aluminio -- Alu (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Image of high encyclopedic and symbolic value, documenting a representative moment of contemporary space exploration. The composition, based on the contrast between the astronaut’s silhouette and the Earth, clearly illustrates the relationship between humanity and its planet from space. It is particularly notable for depicting the first woman to travel toward the Moon, adding historical and social significance. Although the resolution is limited, as it was captured with a mobile device, this aspect reinforces its character as a testimony of our time. Its strong visual impact and wide international media circulation have made it one of the iconic images of the mission, fulfilling the criteria of value and relevance required. -- Alu (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support vip (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support TheBritinator (talk) 01:53, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is probably the first time that a front camera phone selfie is nominated. Interesting. ★ 04:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 08:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Interesting mobile phone picture but over-processed with artifacts and low resolution. Educational for sure, but not FP in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Stunning capture of a truly unique moment, but sadly poor technical quality, likely from image compression and automated in-phone image "optimization". --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 16:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The resolution may be low, but the photograph is very special: deeply human, caring, and maybe even humane, with a dynamic, multi-layered composition reinforcing the depth. It’s quite low-key and might benefit from a slight shadow reveal and a very slight overall exposure boost, if the original raw file is available, but that’s up to the author to decide. --Argenberg (talk) 17:44, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Basile.Ermell (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:49, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Basile. Yann (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Strong support per Argenberg. A photo does not have to be taken with high-end equipment and technical mastery to be a standout. —brainandforce [yap] 15:33, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per nominator and Argenberg. An incredibly rare view that is also beautifully composed artistically. A stunning photo in multiple ways. Gatoclass (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 17:22, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basile an Aciarium. --Milseburg (talk) 13:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Argenberg -- It's moon (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose-- per other S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:05, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Guzman Blanco, Antonio, Gallica, Nadar.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2026 at 18:01:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Antonio Guzman Blanco
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1890
  •  Info created by Nadar – uploaded, restored and nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Historical portrait of a venezuelian politician, who was three times (non consecutive terms) president of his country. This picture was taken by Nadar when Guzman Blanco was in Paris, where he died in 1899. We don't have many historical pictures of south america and south american people. Restored by me. The restoration was tedious and difficult.-- Jebulon (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good restoration. Yann (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- It's moon (talk) 15:09, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ezarateesteban 13:25, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

File:E-2C Hawkeye sits on the flight deck of USS Enterprise 121008-N-JL826-020.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2026 at 07:12:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Grumman Hawkeye aircraft on a flight deck at night
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
  •  Info created by Brooks B. Patton Jr. – uploaded by Marcd30319 – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Exciting aircraft and scene, but sadly it is quite noisy and the stars are already forming visible trails at 8 s exposure. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 10:20, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    It appears that the trailing is from the deck pitching, which is very difficult to escape with long exposure photography in this setting. I know it's not the only issue -- just leaving it here for future reference if a similar photo is nominated. —brainandforce [yap] 15:42, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Aciarium, the scene looks cool but its way too noisy. TheBritinator (talk) 12:31, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Lovely composition, beautiful shapes and colours, atmospheric. Not at all bothered by the "noise". Not every photograph needs to be impeccably detailed, and in this instance, the chances of getting a better quality image under such challenging conditions are minimal. But the "noise" in this photo also gives it an impressionistic touch as well as arguably enhancing the journalistic aspect. Gatoclass (talk) 17:08, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Tabela czasu

Mon 13 Apr → Tue 28 Apr
Tue 14 Apr → Wed 29 Apr
Wed 15 Apr → Thu 30 Apr
Thu 16 Apr → Fri 1 May
Fri 17 Apr → Sat 2 May
Sat 18 Apr → Sun 3 May
Sun 19 Apr → Mon 4 May
Mon 20 Apr → Tue 5 May
Tue 21 Apr → Wed 6 May
Wed 22 Apr → Thu 7 May
Thu 23 Apr → Fri 8 May
Fri 24 Apr → Sat 9 May
Sat 25 Apr → Sun 10 May
Sun 26 Apr → Mon 11 May
Mon 27 Apr → Tue 12 May
Tue 28 Apr → Wed 13 May
Category:Commons-pl
Category:Commons-pl