User talk:Hugo

Image Tagging Image:Affinity-table.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(中国大陆)  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Affinity-table.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 13:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Phosgene.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Phosgene.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


NEUROtiker  21:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

File:Amygdalin-benzaldehyd.png

File:Amygdalin-benzaldehyd.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 04:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Gibberellin-452D.png is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Gibberellin-452D.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Mykhal (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


File:Gibberellin-452D.png

File:Gibberellin-452D.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Metaldehyde2.png

File:Metaldehyde2.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Struct-trisperfluorophenyborane.png

File:Struct-trisperfluorophenyborane.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Zraloci.jpg and File:Hejno.jpg

Hi, why did you tag these as a copyvio? IMO the images should met the conditions for Commons:Freedom of panorama/Europe#Czech Republic or is it installed only temporarily? --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

@Túrelio@Tyna Maria Hi, the user who uploaded the pictures told me that they are not her photos, she doesn't have the copyright to them. Hugo (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Ok. Is that true also for her other uploads, especially those of similar sculptures? --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
@Túrelio No, just these two photos. Thanks! Hugo (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Souřadnice

Zdravím. Koukám, že například u této fotky jsou ulítlé souřadnice asi o 420 metrů, ostatní fotky z té lokality jsou ulítlé méně, ale taky docela dost. Pokud je takto nepřesná aplikace fotoaparátu na mobilu, tak s tím asi moc nenaděláš, takže je to z mé strany spíš jen takový postesk, a upozornění, abys o tom věděl. Ideální by bylo ty souřadnice pak kontrolovat a ručně dolaďovat, ale chápu, že to je piplačka a zabere to dost času, který člověk radši věnuje něčemu jinému. Je zajímavé, že třeba v aplikaci Mapy.cz dokáže mobil většinou určit polohu GPS celkem přesně, a přitom v tutéž chvíli na tom samém mobilu jiné aplikace ji střílejí takto od boku. ŠJů (talk) 12:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

@ŠJů Ahoj, díky za upozornění. Přiznám se, že mě nikdy nenapadlo kontrolovat přesnost souřadnic. Dám si na to pozor a pokusím se to postupně upravovat. Hugo (talk) 12:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Kategorizace a Strukturovaná data

Opět zdravím. K třídění a klasifikaci obrázků a dalších souborů v Commons se používají primárně kategorie (viz Commons:Categories). Ty ovšem nefungují jako pouhé tagování názvy obecných témat, ale je vždy třeba najít pro daný aspekt či kombinaci aspektů co nejhlubší (nejpřesnější, nejkonkrétnější) kategorii, tj. když se nějakému tématu chcete věnovat, je třeba se napřed porozhlédnout, jakým způsobem je dané téma kategorizováno a jaké kategorie pro něj existují, a případné nové kategorie pak zakládat s pochopením a respektováním principu a zvyklostí kategorizace.

Tzv. "strukturovaná data" je nástroj relativně nový, spíše zatím jen testovací, který zatím nemá zcela jasné využití, jejich obsah zatím ani nelze efektivně využívat ani spravovat, a proto jsou strukturovaná data plná z velké části nevyužitelného balastu bez pravidel a metodiky. Nicméně určitá vodítka, jak v SD odkazovat na zobrazovaná témata, přece jen existují: viz Commons:Depicts. Existuje v zásadě shoda na tom, že tento nástroj se má využívat primárně k odkazování na konkrétní témata (instance), tedy položky konkrétních objektů, osob atd., nikoliv na obecná témata (mraky, dopravní značka atd.). A stejně jako v případě kategorií, i zde se má odkazovat jen na to, co je na obrázku buď dominantní, nebo zřetelně a výrazně viditelné, resp. u čeho je reálné, že to někdo bude na daném obrázku hledat, nikoliv něco, co je jen nezřetelně viditelné někde na okraji nebo v pozadí. Odkazovaná nápověda říká, že se tvrzení "zobrazuje" má v SD používat "konzervativně", což by se asi mělo překládat "umírněně", "rozvážně", "zdrženlivě". A stejně jako v případě kategorií, i v odkazech na strukturovaných datech je třeba dávat pozor na nejednoznačné výrazy a neoznačovat například zpomalovací práh jako motorovou brzdu jen proto, že se obojí dá nazvat slovem "retardér".

Každopádně je-li na fotografii nějaký objekt či jev zobrazen natolik zřetelně a výrazně, že je fotografie využitelná jak jeho zobrazení a dokumentace, pak to má být zohledněno především v kategorizaci. "Strukturovaná data" zatím zdaleka nejsou v tak pokročilém stupni vývoje, aby byla schopná kategorizaci funkčně nahradit. Bude-li milion fotografií označeno, že zobrazují "chodník", "dopravní značku" nebo "osobní automobil", těžko si představit, jak takové tagy využít, zatímco v kategorizaci lze pak chodníky, dopravní značky nebo osobní automobily dále třídit do podkategorií podle místa, typu, výrobce, provedení, barvy či jiných relevantních kritérií a wikisoftware obsahuje efektivní nástroje, jak kategorie prohlížet a jejich obsah kontrolovat, třídit a udržovat, aby byly využitelné. Naučte se především správně používat kategorie. ŠJů (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 22:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

File:Eduard Schmidt (physicist).jpg

File:Eduard Schmidt (physicist).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Harold.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 20:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Anniversary Hugo 🎉

Hey @Hugo. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 20 years of dedicated contributions to Wikimedia Commons. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 12:27, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:05, 9 May 2026 (UTC)